Options
politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » GE2019 polling and betting update

Wikipedia list of latest polling with the latest, from ICM, showing LAB the closest pic.twitter.com/sDwy6TZAxQ
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Ooh ooh I know the answer to this one. It’s because lying Tories can’t be trusted, isn’t it?
That`s what I`m hoping for. Building block for the future.
The story would have moved on had they not tried to lie their way out of it
Instead it's still headline news on Look North at least.
BREAKING: Sheree Jenner-Hepburn claims she was hacked. Knows not a soul in Leeds, she says. So, that 'good friend' that was used to debunk our story was - according to her - a fabrication.
Tories get a maj and we are out on 31/1.
If the Tories don't win, Boris will be gone, Corbyn will be PM and they'll legislate to allow EU citizens and 16 yr olds the vote in a jiffy. Sorry once again to all Tory voters here to be so down about this, I truly hope and pray I am wrong - but moments like photogate have historically done profound damage. Reminds a little of the Gillian Duffy story re Gordon Brown.
We are still at circa 9-11 imo
The miserable workings of FPTP will never stop a Tory/Labour robot claiming a fake mandate.
The NHS being under pressure isn't a new revelation
The graph on the last thread was salutary. Given that the polls were clearly closing that time around the consensus that the Tories would get a majority was absurdly robust. A huge misjudgment by the betting markets, one of the biggest since 1992.
Given that most of their work is non-political, I'd assume the likes of YouGov know enough about their panel to be able to ask a lot of nonPBers too
http://www2.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2005/03/01/how-to-improve-your-yougov-ratings/
This ended with me getting a lawyer's letter from YouGov about not following their guidelines and me being expelled from the list.
Some of my constituency bets look dodgy though.
Anyone betting on seat spreads should bear in mind the large MoE either which way.
You simply can't predict them that accurately.
I think the draw of an occasional £50 gets lots of people involved. I'm sure that as a group, people on here are overrepresented, but make up a tiny proportion of the overall YouGov pool.
I bet users of sites like moneysavingexpert are equally overrepresented.
*innocent face*
Ladbrokes still 5/6 each but Paddys now BXP 1/2, Greens 6/4. maybe they've taken some chunky bets. not seen any news to cause BXP shortening.
It could have been a nasty porn photo fir example “BJ caught viewing porn” headlines follow
If they are using all of these panellists for their MRP, these are providing what YouGov themselves say are 14,000 responses a day with about 150 people on average responding each week from each constituency. That’s about twice as many per seat as in 2017.
"Natalie Bennett
@natalieben
Spent yesterday talking to voters on the #IsleofWight. There are many unhappy longtime Tory voters who won't switch to Labour for a host of reasons, but will #VoteGreen"
It seems more the Brighton 2010 plan of coming completely out of the blue in a sort of off-grid grassroots surprise, whereas Bristol West seems more like keenly replicating the kind of seat that Brighton is.
Person of colour
Party member
Muslim
Descendent of immigrants
Working Upper Middle class Northerner
Right wing person of colour
The mother faked the photo.
The mother was appalled by Corbyn's politicizing it.
Boris was terribly wronged by that journalist.
Boris didn't want to look at porn.
(Conversely, if 2ndRef parties end up with a seat majority, the argument of over-riding democratic legitimacy for the first one starts to thin a little IMO).
(I know, I know!)
The NHS video helps, but it is still hard for Labour to get the public to view him as Johnson and not Boris though.
If “another great day on the doorstep” tweets from party activists count as evidence, we are in trouble.