politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Hillary Clinton wins a majority of pledged delegates but Sa

Options
245678

Comments

  • Paristonda
    Paristonda Posts: 1,844
    I think the EC's suggested 80% turnout for the referendum is overestimated. if you start with 66% turnout at the last election, you're gonna get to the majority, but not all, of those people casting a vote (certain loyal Labour and tribal Tory types may just not give a damn about the EU either way). on the other hand, you're going to see certain people (who live in safe seats, or who have a none-of-the-above attitude) voting in this referendum. You're going to see EU turnout at about 68% I reckon.

    Anecdotally, in my own family, amongst the 2015 GE non-voters, 3 are not voting in the referendum as they just don't care, 2 are going for remain because 'why take the risk', and 1 is going for leave because immigration. Wouldn't be surprised to see those figures replicated across the 2015 GE non-voters overall.
  • TheWhiteRabbit
    TheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,455
    edited June 2016
    Given the "decideds" showed a massive skew to Farage (80/20 IIRC), I am not sure we can learn much from "undecideds".
  • FrancisUrquhart
    FrancisUrquhart Posts: 85,729
    Who goes into betting shops these days with that amount of cash? Haven't they heard of the internet?
  • Sunil_Prasannan
    Sunil_Prasannan Posts: 55,077

    I see this is not the thread when pbers across the political spectrum are agonising about poor levels of voter engagement.

    Indeed. I'd rather lose this referendum on an 80% turnout than win it on a 40% turnout.
    If we get to 80% turnout you wont be seeing a Conservative government for quite some time.
    Maybe. But I'm expecting a Thousand Year Cameroon Reich after a strong Remain victory.
    "The Cameroons: a Warning from History"

    narrated by Sam West

    Episode 1:
    "2010 - Helped into Power"
  • AnneJGP
    AnneJGP Posts: 3,743

    Sandpit said:

    chestnut said:

    If anyone wants to know why Cameron wants to break the rules for the election, and extend the registration period it is this:-

    "Around 132,000 of the people who registered on Tuesday were aged under 25, compared to around 13,000 from the 65 to 74-year-old age group."

    They have applied to register, haven't they?

    Last year, it turned out that only 30% actually made it through out of 5m applicants.

    I don't understand why the service crashed at all.

    A well built system on a scalable cloud infrastructure should have handled the surge without problems.

    They KNOW they will get these surges, yet were still not ready for it?

    They stress tested it to GE levels of registration and beyond, but it was several times that levels
    Bollocks. As an IT guy they screwed up, should have known it was coming and planned accordingly. No sympathy for the EC, I want to see their CIO or IT Dir before a select ctte.
    Agreed, when you stress test you don't test your max expected level of usage, you test 5x that amount just in case
    But if they were basing their expected level on the EU interest level registered in polls, they'd be expecting many times less than the GEs.
  • PClipp
    PClipp Posts: 2,138



    I don't understand why the service crashed at all. A well built system on a scalable cloud infrastructure should have handled the surge without problems. They KNOW they will get these surges, yet were still not ready for it?

    They stress tested it to GE levels of registration and beyond, but it was several times that levels
    Except that now it is a matter of individual registration, so it is bound to be a bit different.

    Sometimes one gets the impression that this Conservative Government has no idea what it is doing. I suppose that the person responsible for this fiasco (presumably Mark Hancock) will tender his resignation.
  • TheScreamingEagles
    TheScreamingEagles Posts: 122,806
    Is a voodoo poll.

    The Times point it was a self selecting panel, of which 80% backed Brexit before the debate.

    They also said the undecided sample wasn't representative or scientific.
  • Pulpstar
    Pulpstar Posts: 79,813

    Who goes into betting shops these days with that amount of cash? Haven't they heard of the internet?
    Ladbrokes internet betting limit normally around £2,500 or so.
  • david_herdson
    david_herdson Posts: 18,357
    Pulpstar said:

    tlg86 said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Sandpit said:

    Anna said:

    Assuming Brexit and a Trump presidency aren't correlated - the markets seem to be suggesting it's about evens for one or other or both events to occur. Interesting times!

    Anna, neither are close to evens.

    Brexit is around 11/4 (nearly 3/1) and Trump is 10/3 (3.3/1) to be next President.
    Brexit = 3.75
    Trump = 4.3 ;

    Implied:

    ¬ Brexit = 1.3636..
    ¬ Trump = 1.3030..

    Brexit + Trump = 16.125
    Brexit + ¬ Trump = 4.886
    ¬ Brexit + Trump = 5.8636
    ¬ Brexit + ¬ Trump = 1.7768

    Neither has to be close to Evens for one or the other (Or both) to occur, SQRT(2) ( 1.414) would do it.

    The implied probability of either Trump, Brexit or both right now is 43.7%.
    Bookies should offer accumulators on these things.
    You can with unrelated markets at Ladbrokes. @Shadsy is offering 11.05 on a Trump/Brexit double.
    They're not entirely unrelated. All sorts of events - mostly those that drive isolationism - would increase the chances of both.
  • Given the "decideds" showed a massive skew to Farage (80/20 IIRC), I am not sure we can learn much from "undecideds".
    I think you are misreading the graph. The red are leavers who liked Farage and disliked Cameron. The Blue are remainers who liked Cameron and disliked Farage. The green are undecided.
  • TheScreamingEagles
    TheScreamingEagles Posts: 122,806
    The Mail is talking bollocks on the EU and immigration, say it ain't so

    An article of 3 April ('Report shows the NHS is nearly at breaking point as massive influx of EU migrants forces doctors to take on 1.5million extra patients in just three years') stated that the surge in GP registrations was caused directly by EU migration.

    We are happy to make clear that - while leave EU campaigners blamed the rise in registrations on rising EU migration - the Health & Social Care Information Centre does not provide a breakdown of patients by GP per nationality, and that increasing life expectancy and migration from outside the EU are factors in the rise.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/article-3630502/Clarifications-corrections.html
  • I see this is not the thread when pbers across the political spectrum are agonising about poor levels of voter engagement.

    Indeed. I'd rather lose this referendum on an 80% turnout than win it on a 40% turnout.
    If we get to 80% turnout you wont be seeing a Conservative government for quite some time.
    Maybe. But I'm expecting a Thousand Year Cameroon Reich after a strong Remain victory.
    And a 1000 year Patel Maharani after a Leave victory.
  • MarkHopkins
    MarkHopkins Posts: 5,584

    Is a voodoo poll.

    The Times point it was a self selecting panel, of which 80% backed Brexit before the debate.

    They also said the undecided sample wasn't representative or scientific.

    The voters in the referendum will be a self-selecting panel...

  • Pulpstar
    Pulpstar Posts: 79,813

    Pulpstar said:

    tlg86 said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Sandpit said:

    Anna said:

    Assuming Brexit and a Trump presidency aren't correlated - the markets seem to be suggesting it's about evens for one or other or both events to occur. Interesting times!

    Anna, neither are close to evens.

    Brexit is around 11/4 (nearly 3/1) and Trump is 10/3 (3.3/1) to be next President.
    Brexit = 3.75
    Trump = 4.3 ;

    Implied:

    ¬ Brexit = 1.3636..
    ¬ Trump = 1.3030..

    Brexit + Trump = 16.125
    Brexit + ¬ Trump = 4.886
    ¬ Brexit + Trump = 5.8636
    ¬ Brexit + ¬ Trump = 1.7768

    Neither has to be close to Evens for one or the other (Or both) to occur, SQRT(2) ( 1.414) would do it.

    The implied probability of either Trump, Brexit or both right now is 43.7%.
    Bookies should offer accumulators on these things.
    You can with unrelated markets at Ladbrokes. @Shadsy is offering 11.05 on a Trump/Brexit double.
    They're not entirely unrelated. All sorts of events - mostly those that drive isolationism - would increase the chances of both.
    True, but I doubt that is sufficient to overcome the double over-round.
  • TheWhiteRabbit
    TheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,455

    Given the "decideds" showed a massive skew to Farage (80/20 IIRC), I am not sure we can learn much from "undecideds".
    I think you are misreading the graph. The red are leavers who liked Farage and disliked Cameron. The Blue are remainers who liked Cameron and disliked Farage. The green are undecided.
    We discussed the poll earlier, apparently the sample for the Red Box was heavily skewed pro-Brexit before hand.

    Whilst the undecideds self-identified as such, it is difficult to maintain a true group of swing voters at the best of times. There are far fewer swing voters than self-identified swing voters.

  • TheScreamingEagles
    TheScreamingEagles Posts: 122,806

    Is a voodoo poll.

    The Times point it was a self selecting panel, of which 80% backed Brexit before the debate.

    They also said the undecided sample wasn't representative or scientific.

    The voters in the referendum will be a self-selecting panel...

    #ComfortPolling
  • rcs1000
    rcs1000 Posts: 60,717
    MP_SE said:

    If anyone wants to know why Cameron wants to break the rules for the election, and extend the registration period it is this:-

    "Around 132,000 of the people who registered on Tuesday were aged under 25, compared to around 13,000 from the 65 to 74-year-old age group."

    Why are Leavers afraid of democracy?

    Why do Remainers want to break the rules when things aren't going their way?

    It's not a rule break, the website crashed, before the deadline, they are making sure people aren't disenfranchised.
    Provide another 2 hours for voters to register. Anymore than that and it looks like gerrymandering.
    I think that's a very fair solution, especially as the site was only down for two hours or so.
  • TheScreamingEagles
    TheScreamingEagles Posts: 122,806

    I see this is not the thread when pbers across the political spectrum are agonising about poor levels of voter engagement.

    Indeed. I'd rather lose this referendum on an 80% turnout than win it on a 40% turnout.
    If we get to 80% turnout you wont be seeing a Conservative government for quite some time.
    Maybe. But I'm expecting a Thousand Year Cameroon Reich after a strong Remain victory.
    And a 1000 year Patel Maharani after a Leave victory.
    I still need to publish my hatchet job on Priti Patel
  • Given the "decideds" showed a massive skew to Farage (80/20 IIRC), I am not sure we can learn much from "undecideds".
    I think you are misreading the graph. The red are leavers who liked Farage and disliked Cameron. The Blue are remainers who liked Cameron and disliked Farage. The green are undecided.
    We discussed the poll earlier, apparently the sample for the Red Box was heavily skewed pro-Brexit before hand.

    Whilst the undecideds self-identified as such, it is difficult to maintain a true group of swing voters at the best of times. There are far fewer swing voters than self-identified swing voters.

    OK. Fair enough. I didn't see that.
  • david_herdson
    david_herdson Posts: 18,357

    Who goes into betting shops these days with that amount of cash? Haven't they heard of the internet?
    One wonders about money laundering checks on these kind of bets.
  • kjohnw
    kjohnw Posts: 1,456
    rcs1000 said:

    MP_SE said:

    If anyone wants to know why Cameron wants to break the rules for the election, and extend the registration period it is this:-

    "Around 132,000 of the people who registered on Tuesday were aged under 25, compared to around 13,000 from the 65 to 74-year-old age group."

    Why are Leavers afraid of democracy?

    Why do Remainers want to break the rules when things aren't going their way?

    It's not a rule break, the website crashed, before the deadline, they are making sure people aren't disenfranchised.
    Provide another 2 hours for voters to register. Anymore than that and it looks like gerrymandering.
    I think that's a very fair solution, especially as the site was only down for two hours or so.
    not going to happen. Cameron specifically said those registering today and last night
  • tlg86
    tlg86 Posts: 26,950
    Pulpstar said:

    Pulpstar said:

    tlg86 said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Sandpit said:

    Anna said:

    Assuming Brexit and a Trump presidency aren't correlated - the markets seem to be suggesting it's about evens for one or other or both events to occur. Interesting times!

    Anna, neither are close to evens.

    Brexit is around 11/4 (nearly 3/1) and Trump is 10/3 (3.3/1) to be next President.
    Brexit = 3.75
    Trump = 4.3 ;

    Implied:

    ¬ Brexit = 1.3636..
    ¬ Trump = 1.3030..

    Brexit + Trump = 16.125
    Brexit + ¬ Trump = 4.886
    ¬ Brexit + Trump = 5.8636
    ¬ Brexit + ¬ Trump = 1.7768

    Neither has to be close to Evens for one or the other (Or both) to occur, SQRT(2) ( 1.414) would do it.

    The implied probability of either Trump, Brexit or both right now is 43.7%.
    Bookies should offer accumulators on these things.
    You can with unrelated markets at Ladbrokes. @Shadsy is offering 11.05 on a Trump/Brexit double.
    They're not entirely unrelated. All sorts of events - mostly those that drive isolationism - would increase the chances of both.
    True, but I doubt that is sufficient to overcome the double over-round.
    I had a look at the double over-round on first goal scorer/correct result doubles at the bookies at Arsenal. Those bets are shockingly bad value.
  • SandyRentool
    SandyRentool Posts: 23,156

    I see this is not the thread when pbers across the political spectrum are agonising about poor levels of voter engagement.

    Indeed. I'd rather lose this referendum on an 80% turnout than win it on a 40% turnout.
    If we get to 80% turnout you wont be seeing a Conservative government for quite some time.
    Maybe. But I'm expecting a Thousand Year Cameroon Reich after a strong Remain victory.
    And a 1000 year Patel Maharani after a Leave victory.
    I still need to publish my hatchet job on Priti Patel
    I look forward to it almost as much as the AV thread.
  • Sunil_Prasannan
    Sunil_Prasannan Posts: 55,077

    I see this is not the thread when pbers across the political spectrum are agonising about poor levels of voter engagement.

    Indeed. I'd rather lose this referendum on an 80% turnout than win it on a 40% turnout.
    If we get to 80% turnout you wont be seeing a Conservative government for quite some time.
    Maybe. But I'm expecting a Thousand Year Cameroon Reich after a strong Remain victory.
    And a 1000 year Patel Maharani after a Leave victory.
    I still need to publish my hatchet job on Priti Patel
    BAT Tobacco?
  • TheScreamingEagles
    TheScreamingEagles Posts: 122,806

    I see this is not the thread when pbers across the political spectrum are agonising about poor levels of voter engagement.

    Indeed. I'd rather lose this referendum on an 80% turnout than win it on a 40% turnout.
    If we get to 80% turnout you wont be seeing a Conservative government for quite some time.
    Maybe. But I'm expecting a Thousand Year Cameroon Reich after a strong Remain victory.
    And a 1000 year Patel Maharani after a Leave victory.
    I still need to publish my hatchet job on Priti Patel
    I look forward to it almost as much as the AV thread.
    Well I'm writing a thread about David Cameron making some home made porn.

    That might top an AV thread for excitement.
  • Sunil_Prasannan
    Sunil_Prasannan Posts: 55,077

    I see this is not the thread when pbers across the political spectrum are agonising about poor levels of voter engagement.

    Indeed. I'd rather lose this referendum on an 80% turnout than win it on a 40% turnout.
    If we get to 80% turnout you wont be seeing a Conservative government for quite some time.
    Maybe. But I'm expecting a Thousand Year Cameroon Reich after a strong Remain victory.
    And a 1000 year Patel Maharani after a Leave victory.
    I still need to publish my hatchet job on Priti Patel
    I look forward to it almost as much as the AV thread.
    Sunil J. Prasannan is calling for a total and complete shutdown of AV threads entering PB.com, until our forum's representatives can figure out what the hell is going on!
  • Scott_P
    Scott_P Posts: 51,453
    @faisalislam: Significant new EU referendum TV event news coming up on Sky News in one minute...
  • I see this is not the thread when pbers across the political spectrum are agonising about poor levels of voter engagement.

    Indeed. I'd rather lose this referendum on an 80% turnout than win it on a 40% turnout.
    If we get to 80% turnout you wont be seeing a Conservative government for quite some time.
    Maybe. But I'm expecting a Thousand Year Cameroon Reich after a strong Remain victory.
    And a 1000 year Patel Maharani after a Leave victory.
    I still need to publish my hatchet job on Priti Patel
    And to think that less than 2 months ago you were undecided.
  • dugarbandier
    dugarbandier Posts: 2,596
    https://www.facebook.com/peoplesincampaign/videos/1053759234700690/

    here ye go, loves.. (for balance and a' that)

  • Scott_P
    Scott_P Posts: 51,453
    Corbyn live Q&A on Sky apparently
  • LadyBucket
    LadyBucket Posts: 590
    GIN1138 said:

    tlg86 said:

    From the Guardian:

    "Blair said that Twitter and social media had created “the era of the loudmouth” and that this made David Cameron’s job even harder than the job of prime minister was when he did it."

    Blair also said that he expected turnout at the referendum would be "substantially higher" than the GE.


    Good old Tony getting madder by the day...

    This is probably the first time I have agreed with Tony Blair on anything.

    Social media has been detrimental to politics IMO. Everything seems so short-term in politics these days. The minute they get any flak on twitter/facebook etc they do a "u-turn."

  • welshowl
    welshowl Posts: 4,464
    dr_spyn said:
    This could go very badly wrong if it's really close. Lawyers licking lips.
  • Sandpit
    Sandpit Posts: 56,045

    I see this is not the thread when pbers across the political spectrum are agonising about poor levels of voter engagement.

    Indeed. I'd rather lose this referendum on an 80% turnout than win it on a 40% turnout.
    I'm on the opposite side to you, but agree entirely. A turnout above GE level shows a mandate for the result, whichever way it goes.
  • tlg86
    tlg86 Posts: 26,950
    Scott_P said:

    Corbyn live Q&A on Sky apparently

    Oh for goodness sake!
  • GIN1138
    GIN1138 Posts: 22,938
    MaxPB said:

    I don't understand what the problem is, just move the deadline to midnight tonight, if it crashes again, then tough luck.

    And on 23rd June, we'll extend polling station opening hours to 1pm on 24th June? But only in London, Scotland and Northern Ireland? ;)
  • TheScreamingEagles
    TheScreamingEagles Posts: 122,806

    I see this is not the thread when pbers across the political spectrum are agonising about poor levels of voter engagement.

    Indeed. I'd rather lose this referendum on an 80% turnout than win it on a 40% turnout.
    If we get to 80% turnout you wont be seeing a Conservative government for quite some time.
    Maybe. But I'm expecting a Thousand Year Cameroon Reich after a strong Remain victory.
    And a 1000 year Patel Maharani after a Leave victory.
    I still need to publish my hatchet job on Priti Patel
    And to think that less than 2 months ago you were undecided.
    I've been very impressed by Leavers like Andrea Leadsom and Chris Grayling who have acted honourably in this referendum.

    Priti Patel has been a complete numpty.

    Plus her logic for supporting the death penalty has irked me for many years.
  • dugarbandier
    dugarbandier Posts: 2,596

    I see this is not the thread when pbers across the political spectrum are agonising about poor levels of voter engagement.

    Indeed. I'd rather lose this referendum on an 80% turnout than win it on a 40% turnout.
    If we get to 80% turnout you wont be seeing a Conservative government for quite some time.
    Maybe. But I'm expecting a Thousand Year Cameroon Reich after a strong Remain victory.
    And a 1000 year Patel Maharani after a Leave victory.
    I still need to publish my hatchet job on Priti Patel
    I look forward to it almost as much as the AV thread.
    Well I'm writing a thread about David Cameron making some home made porn.

    That might top an AV thread for excitement.
    piggin 'ell
  • TOPPING
    TOPPING Posts: 44,060
    Scott_P said:

    Corbyn live Q&A on Sky apparently

    He is going to be forensically dissected. By schoolchildren.
  • Pulpstar
    Pulpstar Posts: 79,813

    I see this is not the thread when pbers across the political spectrum are agonising about poor levels of voter engagement.

    Indeed. I'd rather lose this referendum on an 80% turnout than win it on a 40% turnout.
    If we get to 80% turnout you wont be seeing a Conservative government for quite some time.
    Maybe. But I'm expecting a Thousand Year Cameroon Reich after a strong Remain victory.
    And a 1000 year Patel Maharani after a Leave victory.
    I still need to publish my hatchet job on Priti Patel
    And to think that less than 2 months ago you were undecided.
    I've been very impressed by Leavers like Andrea Leadsom and Chris Grayling who have acted honourably in this referendum.

    Priti Patel has been a complete numpty.

    Plus her logic for supporting the death penalty has irked me for many years.
    Chris Grayling has been much more measured than I expected.
  • GIN1138
    GIN1138 Posts: 22,938

    GIN1138 said:

    tlg86 said:

    From the Guardian:

    "Blair said that Twitter and social media had created “the era of the loudmouth” and that this made David Cameron’s job even harder than the job of prime minister was when he did it."

    Blair also said that he expected turnout at the referendum would be "substantially higher" than the GE.


    Good old Tony getting madder by the day...

    This is probably the first time I have agreed with Tony Blair on anything.

    Social media has been detrimental to politics IMO. Everything seems so short-term in politics these days. The minute they get any flak on twitter/facebook etc they do a "u-turn."

    What is Tony's solution? To bomb Facebook and Twitter HQ? :smiley:
  • NickPalmer
    NickPalmer Posts: 21,724
    Out of the blue, had a long-standing correspondent for Broxtowe send me an email saying that I and everyone else supporting Remain were TRAITORS.

    I've asked him if it's not a bit worrying to think that roughly half the population seem to be traitors, did he think that a few might be non-traitors with a different opinion?

    No reply so far!
  • TheWhiteRabbit
    TheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,455
    welshowl said:

    dr_spyn said:
    This could go very badly wrong if it's really close. Lawyers licking lips.
    ... lawyers for whom!?
  • TheScreamingEagles
    TheScreamingEagles Posts: 122,806

    Out of the blue, had a long-standing correspondent for Broxtowe send me an email saying that I and everyone else supporting Remain were TRAITORS.

    I've asked him if it's not a bit worrying to think that roughly half the population seem to be traitors, did he think that a few might be non-traitors with a different opinion?

    No reply so far!

    I never knew SeanT lived in Broxtowe.
  • Scott_P
    Scott_P Posts: 51,453
    SPIN markets back. Turnout up :)
  • GIN1138
    GIN1138 Posts: 22,938
    edited June 2016

    Out of the blue, had a long-standing correspondent for Broxtowe send me an email saying that I and everyone else supporting Remain were TRAITORS.

    I've asked him if it's not a bit worrying to think that roughly half the population seem to be traitors, did he think that a few might be non-traitors with a different opinion?

    No reply so far!

    SeanT has a residence in Broxtowe?

    Who knew! :open_mouth:
  • TheScreamingEagles
    TheScreamingEagles Posts: 122,806
    Pulpstar said:

    I see this is not the thread when pbers across the political spectrum are agonising about poor levels of voter engagement.

    Indeed. I'd rather lose this referendum on an 80% turnout than win it on a 40% turnout.
    If we get to 80% turnout you wont be seeing a Conservative government for quite some time.
    Maybe. But I'm expecting a Thousand Year Cameroon Reich after a strong Remain victory.
    And a 1000 year Patel Maharani after a Leave victory.
    I still need to publish my hatchet job on Priti Patel
    And to think that less than 2 months ago you were undecided.
    I've been very impressed by Leavers like Andrea Leadsom and Chris Grayling who have acted honourably in this referendum.

    Priti Patel has been a complete numpty.

    Plus her logic for supporting the death penalty has irked me for many years.
    Chris Grayling has been much more measured than I expected.
    Patel has gone out of her way to trash Cameron and the Government, Grayling has done the exact opposite.

    Ditto Liam Fox.

    Sack Patel, and promote Grayling and Fox.
  • tlg86
    tlg86 Posts: 26,950
    @NickPalmer - SeanT sweeping the nation? :D

  • LadyBucket
    LadyBucket Posts: 590
    I am totally against extending the deadline for voter registration. The government must have spent millions on publicising getting registered and as usual the "lazy, couldn't be bothered, last minute brigade, are now being pandered to for purely political reasons. The Electoral Commission have questions to answer on how this wasn't planned for.

    I think politics just stinks at the moment. There was no public trust before but now it must be zero.
  • david_herdson
    david_herdson Posts: 18,357

    GIN1138 said:

    tlg86 said:

    From the Guardian:

    "Blair said that Twitter and social media had created “the era of the loudmouth” and that this made David Cameron’s job even harder than the job of prime minister was when he did it."

    Blair also said that he expected turnout at the referendum would be "substantially higher" than the GE.


    Good old Tony getting madder by the day...

    This is probably the first time I have agreed with Tony Blair on anything.

    Social media has been detrimental to politics IMO. Everything seems so short-term in politics these days. The minute they get any flak on twitter/facebook etc they do a "u-turn."

    On the other hand, it has reduced the power of the mainstream media.

    Fact is, in any democracy, there will always be some channels for popular opinion that make themselves felt on the government.
  • Scott_P
    Scott_P Posts: 51,453
    New Forth Bridge delayed by 6 months

    @BBCPhilipSim: Queenferry Crossing crews lost 13 days in April and 12 days in May because of strong winds. Mr Brown says delay is "very recent development"

    @rougvie77: 25 days construction lost due to weather. Six months late on completion.
    My maths is even worse than I thought.
  • Scott_P
    Scott_P Posts: 51,453
    Oh dear

    @cicorre64: Dear Mr Cameron, I attach a photograph of 'Little Englanders..' Last night you insulted a nation. Resign. https://t.co/N4msMrIKYv

    @Otto_English:
    A: British war graves are slabs
    B: French graves are crosses
    C: Tricolour visible on the left
    D: You're an idiot https://t.co/4n3lt1E0Tx
  • TheWhiteRabbit
    TheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,455
    Scott_P said:

    New Forth Bridge delayed by 6 months

    @BBCPhilipSim: Queenferry Crossing crews lost 13 days in April and 12 days in May because of strong winds. Mr Brown says delay is "very recent development"

    @rougvie77: 25 days construction lost due to weather. Six months late on completion.
    My maths is even worse than I thought.

    At least it's not like that new Berlin airport. What was it, a week before opening it was put back by three years?!
  • TOPPING
    TOPPING Posts: 44,060
    edited June 2016
    o/t v interesting wiki page on Dominic Chappell.
  • nunu
    nunu Posts: 6,024
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-36478307

    brexit is not hurting the economy.
  • FrancisUrquhart
    FrancisUrquhart Posts: 85,729
    edited June 2016
    Scott_P said:

    Corbyn live Q&A on Sky apparently

    Let's see if he can do better than with joey Essex...i am presuming the school kids will be more intelligent...more intelligent than corbyn that is!
  • dugarbandier
    dugarbandier Posts: 2,596

    I am totally against extending the deadline for voter registration. The government must have spent millions on publicising getting registered and as usual the "lazy, couldn't be bothered, last minute brigade, are now being pandered to for purely political reasons. The Electoral Commission have questions to answer on how this wasn't planned for.

    I think politics just stinks at the moment. There was no public trust before but now it must be zero.

    they could extend the franchise to 16yr olds too...

    (did they do that in Scotland, or did I dream it?)
  • Sunil_Prasannan
    Sunil_Prasannan Posts: 55,077

    I see this is not the thread when pbers across the political spectrum are agonising about poor levels of voter engagement.

    Indeed. I'd rather lose this referendum on an 80% turnout than win it on a 40% turnout.
    If we get to 80% turnout you wont be seeing a Conservative government for quite some time.
    Maybe. But I'm expecting a Thousand Year Cameroon Reich after a strong Remain victory.
    And a 1000 year Patel Maharani after a Leave victory.
    I still need to publish my hatchet job on Priti Patel
    And to think that less than 2 months ago you were undecided.
    I've been very impressed by Leavers like Andrea Leadsom and Chris Grayling who have acted honourably in this referendum.

    Priti Patel has been a complete numpty.

    Plus her logic for supporting the death penalty has irked me for many years.
    Don't they have the death penalty in your religion?

    *innocent face*
  • FrancisUrquhart
    FrancisUrquhart Posts: 85,729
    Why were so many people waiting until 2 hrs before the deadline?
  • RodCrosby
    RodCrosby Posts: 7,737
    New deadline: midnight tomorrow night....
  • GIN1138
    GIN1138 Posts: 22,938

    Why were so many people waiting until 2 hrs before the deadline?

    Same reason a lot of people wait until two minutes to ten to turn up at their Polling station...
  • GIN1138
    GIN1138 Posts: 22,938
    edited June 2016
    RodCrosby said:

    New deadline: midnight tomorrow night....

    What do you think to this Rod? Legal? Illegal?
  • SandyRentool
    SandyRentool Posts: 23,156

    Pulpstar said:

    I see this is not the thread when pbers across the political spectrum are agonising about poor levels of voter engagement.

    Indeed. I'd rather lose this referendum on an 80% turnout than win it on a 40% turnout.
    If we get to 80% turnout you wont be seeing a Conservative government for quite some time.
    Maybe. But I'm expecting a Thousand Year Cameroon Reich after a strong Remain victory.
    And a 1000 year Patel Maharani after a Leave victory.
    I still need to publish my hatchet job on Priti Patel
    And to think that less than 2 months ago you were undecided.
    I've been very impressed by Leavers like Andrea Leadsom and Chris Grayling who have acted honourably in this referendum.

    Priti Patel has been a complete numpty.

    Plus her logic for supporting the death penalty has irked me for many years.
    Chris Grayling has been much more measured than I expected.
    Patel has gone out of her way to trash Cameron and the Government, Grayling has done the exact opposite.

    Ditto Liam Fox.

    Sack Patel, and promote Grayling and Fox.
    IIRC, didn't Cameron pretty much say he would sack Patel after the referendum? She is merely getting her revenge in early. Of course, by September I only expect one of them to be in government - and it ain't Dave.
  • Toms
    Toms Posts: 2,478

    Out of the blue, had a long-standing correspondent for Broxtowe send me an email saying that I and everyone else supporting Remain were TRAITORS.

    I've asked him if it's not a bit worrying to think that roughly half the population seem to be traitors, did he think that a few might be non-traitors with a different opinion?

    No reply so far!

    Treating those "traitors" to capital punishment would be like solving over-population by putting boys down at birth as, I seem to remember, was suggested by the Grey Friars janitor/gardener in the Billy Bunter stories.
  • MarkHopkins
    MarkHopkins Posts: 5,584
    RodCrosby said:

    New deadline: midnight tomorrow night....


    for now...

  • FrancisUrquhart
    FrancisUrquhart Posts: 85,729
    GIN1138 said:

    Why were so many people waiting until 2 hrs before the deadline?

    Same reason a lot of people wait until two minutes to ten to turn up at their Polling station...
    To be fair I can imagine occurrences why you might not be able to get to a polling station until really late on ie work / delays on trains etc, but registering online to vote takes 2 minutes & can be done anytime, anywhere.
  • TheScreamingEagles
    TheScreamingEagles Posts: 122,806

    I see this is not the thread when pbers across the political spectrum are agonising about poor levels of voter engagement.

    Indeed. I'd rather lose this referendum on an 80% turnout than win it on a 40% turnout.
    If we get to 80% turnout you wont be seeing a Conservative government for quite some time.
    Maybe. But I'm expecting a Thousand Year Cameroon Reich after a strong Remain victory.
    And a 1000 year Patel Maharani after a Leave victory.
    I still need to publish my hatchet job on Priti Patel
    And to think that less than 2 months ago you were undecided.
    I've been very impressed by Leavers like Andrea Leadsom and Chris Grayling who have acted honourably in this referendum.

    Priti Patel has been a complete numpty.

    Plus her logic for supporting the death penalty has irked me for many years.
    Don't they have the death penalty in your religion?

    *innocent face*
    I'm not religious.

    Typical leaver, always obsessed about Muslims.
  • TheScreamingEagles
    TheScreamingEagles Posts: 122,806

    Pulpstar said:

    I see this is not the thread when pbers across the political spectrum are agonising about poor levels of voter engagement.

    Indeed. I'd rather lose this referendum on an 80% turnout than win it on a 40% turnout.
    If we get to 80% turnout you wont be seeing a Conservative government for quite some time.
    Maybe. But I'm expecting a Thousand Year Cameroon Reich after a strong Remain victory.
    And a 1000 year Patel Maharani after a Leave victory.
    I still need to publish my hatchet job on Priti Patel
    And to think that less than 2 months ago you were undecided.
    I've been very impressed by Leavers like Andrea Leadsom and Chris Grayling who have acted honourably in this referendum.

    Priti Patel has been a complete numpty.

    Plus her logic for supporting the death penalty has irked me for many years.
    Chris Grayling has been much more measured than I expected.
    Patel has gone out of her way to trash Cameron and the Government, Grayling has done the exact opposite.

    Ditto Liam Fox.

    Sack Patel, and promote Grayling and Fox.
    IIRC, didn't Cameron pretty much say he would sack Patel after the referendum? She is merely getting her revenge in early. Of course, by September I only expect one of them to be in government - and it ain't Dave.
    No.
  • FrancisUrquhart
    FrancisUrquhart Posts: 85,729
    If it does end up really close all this stuff about eu citizens wrongly getting polling cards & extended time to register is going to earn lawyers a lot of money.
  • TheScreamingEagles
    TheScreamingEagles Posts: 122,806
    Huzzah.

    We're getting an Ipsos Mori poll next week.

    Then one on the 22nd.
  • Cookie
    Cookie Posts: 15,685
    GIN1138 said:

    Why were so many people waiting until 2 hrs before the deadline?

    Same reason a lot of people wait until two minutes to ten to turn up at their Polling station...
    Although I think if you turn up at two minutes to ten and there's a massive queue, you can still vote - as long as you're in the queue before ten you'll be fine. Unfortunately I'm not sure there's an online equivalent.
  • TGOHF
    TGOHF Posts: 21,633
    It was MI7 crashing the website to give more remainers time to register.

  • Pro_Rata
    Pro_Rata Posts: 5,690

    GIN1138 said:

    Why were so many people waiting until 2 hrs before the deadline?

    Same reason a lot of people wait until two minutes to ten to turn up at their Polling station...
    To be fair I can imagine occurrences why you might not be able to get to a polling station until really late on ie work / delays on trains etc, but registering online to vote takes 2 minutes & can be done anytime, anywhere.
    Like it or not, registering with 1 or 2 hours to go is just as legitimate as having been on the register for years and renewing as soon as prompted. The extension to tomorrow night is no more and no less than we should have expected, enough for the news to get out and for people to check back but not any longer.

    Did I read down thread that they were going to try and verify that those registering today and tomorrow had attempted to access the website last night, or is that wrong?
  • FrancisUrquhart
    FrancisUrquhart Posts: 85,729
    edited June 2016
    TGOHF said:

    It was MI7 crashing the website to give more remainers time to register.

    I hear the operation was run out of some offices in finchley road...
  • dugarbandier
    dugarbandier Posts: 2,596

    If it does end up really close all this stuff about eu citizens wrongly getting polling cards & extended time to register is going to earn lawyers a lot of money.

    any chance of it being finally decided in the european court of human rights ..... :)
  • TheScreamingEagles
    TheScreamingEagles Posts: 122,806
    TGOHF said:

    It was MI7 crashing the website to give more remainers time to register.

    I hope all you Leavers are using pens and not pencils when you send in your postal votes so MI7 can't rub your votes out.
  • DavidL
    DavidL Posts: 55,867
    TOPPING said:

    Scott_P said:

    Corbyn live Q&A on Sky apparently

    He is going to be forensically dissected. By schoolchildren.
    Well at least that is a fair fight (if he chooses his school carefully).
  • FrancisUrquhart
    FrancisUrquhart Posts: 85,729

    TGOHF said:

    It was MI7 crashing the website to give more remainers time to register.

    I hope all you Leavers are using pens and not pencils when you send in your postal votes so MI7 can't rub your votes out.
    The real question is if you are offered the chance to change your vote do you stick or switch?
  • DavidL
    DavidL Posts: 55,867

    Out of the blue, had a long-standing correspondent for Broxtowe send me an email saying that I and everyone else supporting Remain were TRAITORS.

    I've asked him if it's not a bit worrying to think that roughly half the population seem to be traitors, did he think that a few might be non-traitors with a different opinion?

    No reply so far!

    The riptide of madness let loose by this referendum is, well, unfortunate. Sometimes I wonder if asking the people is overrated.
  • Sandpit
    Sandpit Posts: 56,045

    If it does end up really close all this stuff about eu citizens wrongly getting polling cards & extended time to register is going to earn lawyers a lot of money.

    If it's 51-49 in either direction, it's going to be the UK version of the 2000 US Presidential Election.
  • PlatoSaid
    PlatoSaid Posts: 10,383

    Scott_P said:

    Corbyn live Q&A on Sky apparently

    Let's see if he can do better than with joey Essex...i am presuming the school kids will be more intelligent...more intelligent than corbyn that is!
    My favourite bit with Joey Essex was the look on EdM's face - he clearly didn't understand a word he said, hence asking others to answer him. I know Joey's got quite a strong accent, but it's not that impenetrable.
  • DavidL
    DavidL Posts: 55,867

    TGOHF said:

    It was MI7 crashing the website to give more remainers time to register.

    I hope all you Leavers are using pens and not pencils when you send in your postal votes so MI7 can't rub your votes out.
    The real question is if you are offered the chance to change your vote do you stick or switch?
    LOL. Excellent.
  • TheWhiteRabbit
    TheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,455

    If it does end up really close all this stuff about eu citizens wrongly getting polling cards & extended time to register is going to earn lawyers a lot of money.

    Only if it's 50.1% v 49.9% close.
  • JohnO
    JohnO Posts: 4,312
    edited June 2016

    Pulpstar said:

    I see this is not the thread when pbers across the political spectrum are agonising about poor levels of voter engagement.

    Indeed. I'd rather lose this referendum on an 80% turnout than win it on a 40% turnout.
    If we get to 80% turnout you wont be seeing a Conservative government for quite some time.
    Maybe. But I'm expecting a Thousand Year Cameroon Reich after a strong Remain victory.
    And a 1000 year Patel Maharani after a Leave victory.
    I still need to publish my hatchet job on Priti Patel
    And to think that less than 2 months ago you were undecided.
    I've been very impressed by Leavers like Andrea Leadsom and Chris Grayling who have acted honourably in this referendum.

    Priti Patel has been a complete numpty.

    Plus her logic for supporting the death penalty has irked me for many years.
    Chris Grayling has been much more measured than I expected.
    Patel has gone out of her way to trash Cameron and the Government, Grayling has done the exact opposite.

    Ditto Liam Fox.

    Sack Patel, and promote Grayling and Fox.
    IIRC, didn't Cameron pretty much say he would sack Patel after the referendum? She is merely getting her revenge in early. Of course, by September I only expect one of them to be in government - and it ain't Dave.
    Priti won't be sacked (if Remain win) but she will be denied full Cabinet membership (which was almost hers for the taking) and shuffled off to another more junior department but remaining a Minister of State.
  • hunchman
    hunchman Posts: 2,591

    TGOHF said:

    It was MI7 crashing the website to give more remainers time to register.

    I hear the operation was run out of some offices in finchley road...
    STFU!!
  • DavidL
    DavidL Posts: 55,867
    Has anybody worked out why Gibraltar have been given the vote in this referendum yet? Just because they are a part of one of our European Parliamentary seats it is not obvious why they should get a say on what the UK should do as a sovereign nation. If it gets really close this is going to look even odder.
  • dugarbandier
    dugarbandier Posts: 2,596
    DavidL said:

    TGOHF said:

    It was MI7 crashing the website to give more remainers time to register.

    I hope all you Leavers are using pens and not pencils when you send in your postal votes so MI7 can't rub your votes out.
    The real question is if you are offered the chance to change your vote do you stick or switch?
    LOL. Excellent.
    is the eu the goat or the car?
  • FrancisUrquhart
    FrancisUrquhart Posts: 85,729

    If it does end up really close all this stuff about eu citizens wrongly getting polling cards & extended time to register is going to earn lawyers a lot of money.

    Only if it's 50.1% v 49.9% close.
    Ultimately I doubt it will be that close and all of this will be academic.
  • SandyRentool
    SandyRentool Posts: 23,156
    Sandpit said:

    If it does end up really close all this stuff about eu citizens wrongly getting polling cards & extended time to register is going to earn lawyers a lot of money.

    If it's 51-49 in either direction, it's going to be the UK version of the 2000 US Presidential Election.
    Austria seems to have accepted their knife edge result without any faff. The key question is whether any irregularity would be sufficient to alter the result. You probably need to have a sub 50,000 margin before anyone would get too agitated.
  • kjohnw
    kjohnw Posts: 1,456
    TOPPING said:

    Scott_P said:

    Corbyn live Q&A on Sky apparently

    He is going to be forensically dissected. By schoolchildren.
    for balance they could get George Galloway on for Leave Lol
  • VapidBilge
    VapidBilge Posts: 412
    Hold on a sec.

    Didn't we just have some elections in April?

    Why the complete lack of concern by all parties (voters included) on registration then?
  • John_M
    John_M Posts: 7,503
    DavidL said:

    Out of the blue, had a long-standing correspondent for Broxtowe send me an email saying that I and everyone else supporting Remain were TRAITORS.

    I've asked him if it's not a bit worrying to think that roughly half the population seem to be traitors, did he think that a few might be non-traitors with a different opinion?

    No reply so far!

    The riptide of madness let loose by this referendum is, well, unfortunate. Sometimes I wonder if asking the people is overrated.
    It's a little like Athenian democracy - when you actually study the period and see some of the boneheaded things they voted through during their golden period, it really does make you mutter under your breath.

    As one example, Themistocles (saviour of the Greeks at Salamis) was stripped of his naval command in the following year, and ostracised a few years later. It was even worse during the Peloponnesian War.
  • dugarbandier
    dugarbandier Posts: 2,596

    Sandpit said:

    If it does end up really close all this stuff about eu citizens wrongly getting polling cards & extended time to register is going to earn lawyers a lot of money.

    If it's 51-49 in either direction, it's going to be the UK version of the 2000 US Presidential Election.
    Austria seems to have accepted their knife edge result without any faff. The key question is whether any irregularity would be sufficient to alter the result. You probably need to have a sub 50,000 margin before anyone would get too agitated.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jun/08/austrias-far-right-freedom-party-challenges-presidential-election-reults
  • david_herdson
    david_herdson Posts: 18,357

    Hold on a sec.

    Didn't we just have some elections in April?

    Why the complete lack of concern by all parties (voters included) on registration then?

    We had some quite big ones in May. Not many in April.
  • welshowl
    welshowl Posts: 4,464
    DavidL said:

    Has anybody worked out why Gibraltar have been given the vote in this referendum yet? Just because they are a part of one of our European Parliamentary seats it is not obvious why they should get a say on what the UK should do as a sovereign nation. If it gets really close this is going to look even odder.

    I asked about the Channel Islands and IoM earlier. Nobody replied.....
  • DavidL
    DavidL Posts: 55,867

    Sandpit said:

    If it does end up really close all this stuff about eu citizens wrongly getting polling cards & extended time to register is going to earn lawyers a lot of money.

    If it's 51-49 in either direction, it's going to be the UK version of the 2000 US Presidential Election.
    Austria seems to have accepted their knife edge result without any faff. The key question is whether any irregularity would be sufficient to alter the result. You probably need to have a sub 50,000 margin before anyone would get too agitated.
    In my limited experience fantasies about lawyers earning mountains of dosh arguing about election results seem to be mainly that. :-(
This discussion has been closed.