Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Hillary Clinton wins a majority of pledged delegates but Sa

1234568»

Comments

  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383
    I've remembered when I saw that letter's author.

    She gave an awful interview on Sky, all very metro smug and her killer fact was that 200 artists had supported Remain.
  • Options
    Scott_P said:

    Ok, but what was your careful calm assessment of Osborne's performance and its effect?

    It will have no effect whatsoever
    But I thought he gave as good as he got. Compared to Hilary Benn it was a masterclass in dealing with Andrew Neil. I expect he is quite happy with it, as are others in my timeline (clearly I follow different people to Plato, although she regularly posts the same things I do...)..
    Thank you.
  • Options
    CD13CD13 Posts: 6,355
    Mr P,

    "It will have no effect whatsoever."

    I suspect you're right, but he might be better advising customers on wallpaper design.
  • Options
    fitalassfitalass Posts: 4,289
    Twitter
    James Forsyth ‏@JGForsyth 4m4 minutes ago
    Unconfirmed rumours in Westminster tonight that @sarahwollaston is going to defect from Vote Leave tomorrow & criticise £350 million figure
  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383

    PlatoSaid said:

    Right, I have just set up and sent my first twat.

    How does this work? What do I do?

    Include a cat video
    Don't do cats!
    What's your Twitter name?
  • Options
    FeersumEnjineeyaFeersumEnjineeya Posts: 4,064
    edited June 2016

    CD13 said:

    I don't like Osborne, so I'm probably biased, but if he was Pinocchio, his nose would have been scratching Neill's cheek.
    The 200,000 annual immigrants assumed by the Treasury for their figures, vigorously promoted by George, was a hoot. I'm still waiting for Remain to explain.

    The lies from Osborne were just piled up. At no point can I recall him admitting a mistake, correcting it, saying sorry and moving on. Which is the mark of a good Leader.
    The purpose of the Treasury report was to determine the effects on GDP per capita resulting from changes to trading arrangements and foreign direct investment under different Brexit scenarios. It didn't look at immigration at all and simply assumed 185,000 per year for the purpose of comparison. The fact that they used this figure rather than an unrealistically low figure is, I would have thought, evidence that the Osborne wasn't telling them what to do.

    Of course, if you also assume sharp restrictions to immigration under a Brexit scenario, the figures look even worse for the UK. This wasn't part of the Treasury remit though.
  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    We're going to need to stockpile the word "Judas" for tomorrow because there's going to be a run on it by the sound of things.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 115,950
    Jobabob said:

    Remain should bide their time. Don't preempt her!
    Indeed, I actually persuaded a voter to switch from Leave to Remain this evening.
  • Options
    hunchmanhunchman Posts: 2,591
    LucyJones said:

    Osborne banging on about Nigel Farage, repeating the name as much as possible.

    My 15-year-old daughter got an email yesterday from Stronger In, basically asking her to tweet anti-Farage messages during yesterday's debate. There were a few "reminders" as to how nasty he is, presumably for a bit of encouragement. E.g. "He calls gays f**s" and "He doesn't think migrants should be treated for AIDS on the NHS".

    My daughter isn't old enough to vote, but she did show me the email and comment that: "They don't give a single reason to vote In, they just make it sound like a way to get at Farage. It is a really important decision and they make it sound like it all comes down to how best to spite one man?!?".
    And then they wonder why their campaign is going down like a lead balloon when they have absolutely nothing positive to say about the EU! Think about a salesman adopting that tactic trying to sell you a BMW car. The Audi is of crap build quality, the Mercedes is out-dated, the Lexus well that's those Japanese who built that outside the EU so can't be as good, so by default you should buy the Beamer! Well that's how the tone of the Remain campaign is coming across to me so far!
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 57,303
    Scott_P said:

    Defect to whom?

    @JGForsyth: Unconfirmed rumours in Westminster tonight that @sarahwollaston is going to defect from Vote Leave tomorrow & criticise £350 million figure

    Now, where are all the Brexiteers who were bigging her up as a potential future leader?
    I was always very nervous about Sarah Wollaston.

    She's a loose cannon.
  • Options
    JonnyJimmyJonnyJimmy Posts: 2,548

    If she's going to defect to Remain, then she's a principled, patriotic lioness.

    Want a bet at evens on whether she'll turn to the dark side?
  • Options
    fitalass said:

    Twitter
    James Forsyth ‏@JGForsyth 4m4 minutes ago
    Unconfirmed rumours in Westminster tonight that @sarahwollaston is going to defect from Vote Leave tomorrow & criticise £350 million figure

    Dead cat move by Osborne, in its timing, oh look over there.
  • Options
    Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 61,058
    Listening to DC yesterday and Geo Osborne tonight there seems to be a change in focus directed at Farage and trying to conflate Farage with Vote Leave. It will be interesting to see if this attack format intensifiies over the rest of the campaign
  • Options
    CD13 said:

    Mr P,
    "It will have no effect whatsoever."
    I suspect you're right, but he might be better advising customers on wallpaper design.

    No, he would be telling the customers that they must have this roll otherwise their house would fall down.
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,162
    Mr. Eagles, if she goes to Remain, it'll be interesting to see if she has similar views of the £4,300 figure. Of course, she may go to a different Leave campaign, or none.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453

    I was always very nervous about Sarah Wollaston.

    LOL !
  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383

    Scott_P said:

    Defect to whom?

    @JGForsyth: Unconfirmed rumours in Westminster tonight that @sarahwollaston is going to defect from Vote Leave tomorrow & criticise £350 million figure

    Now, where are all the Brexiteers who were bigging her up as a potential future leader?
    I was always very nervous about Sarah Wollaston.

    She's a loose cannon.
    I think she's been an attention seeker from the start, I couldn't care less what she does.
  • Options
    hunchmanhunchman Posts: 2,591

    If she's going to defect to Remain, then she's a principled, patriotic lioness.

    Just a political stunt by Remain - what utterly desperate lengths they're prepared to go to.
  • Options
    TheWhiteRabbitTheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,397

    Scott_P said:

    Defect to whom?

    @JGForsyth: Unconfirmed rumours in Westminster tonight that @sarahwollaston is going to defect from Vote Leave tomorrow & criticise £350 million figure

    Now, where are all the Brexiteers who were bigging her up as a potential future leader?
    I was always very nervous about Sarah Wollaston.

    She's a loose cannon.
    Like Carswell, no? Someone who forms their own view, then works out which party comes closest.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    PlatoSaid said:

    I think she's been an attention seeker from the start, I couldn't care less what she does.

    ROFL !
  • Options
    JobabobJobabob Posts: 3,807
    PlatoSaid said:

    Scott_P said:

    Defect to whom?

    @JGForsyth: Unconfirmed rumours in Westminster tonight that @sarahwollaston is going to defect from Vote Leave tomorrow & criticise £350 million figure

    Now, where are all the Brexiteers who were bigging her up as a potential future leader?
    I was always very nervous about Sarah Wollaston.

    She's a loose cannon.
    I think she's been an attention seeker from the start, I couldn't care less what she does.
    Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
  • Options
    MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 37,686
    Shame about Wollaston, I agree with her about the £350m, I think it is the wrong figure and I don't think the leave camp should use it. The real figure of £200m is still large enough and is actually true. I don't see much difference between £350m per week or £200m per week in terms of shifting votes, it is unfortunate that the leave campaign have dug their heels in so much over the use of it, when they should have held their hands up and moved to the £200m per week figure when the ONS told them to.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 57,303

    Jobabob said:

    Remain should bide their time. Don't preempt her!
    Indeed, I actually persuaded a voter to switch from Leave to Remain this evening.
    Maybe they just said it to make you go away.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    The pavlovian responses from the Brexiteers to an unconfirmed rumour are hilarious.

    Who will be next in line for their ire?
  • Options
    JobabobJobabob Posts: 3,807

    Jobabob said:

    Remain should bide their time. Don't preempt her!
    Indeed, I actually persuaded a voter to switch from Leave to Remain this evening.
    Well done!
  • Options
    MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 37,686
    Shame about Wollaston, I agree with her about the £350m, I think it is the wrong figure and I don't think the leave camp should use it. The real figure of £200m is still large enough and is actually true. I don't see much difference between £350m per week or £200m per week in terms of shifting votes, it is unfortunate that the leave campaign have dug their heels in so much over the use of it, when they should have held their hands up and moved to the £200m per week figure when the ONS told them to.
  • Options
    BenedictWhiteBenedictWhite Posts: 1,944
    Scott_P said:

    I have searched my timeline for panicking Remainers in the wake of Osborne's "car crash" interview.

    Can't find any

    Found this though

    @MrHarryCole: Hear @sarahwollaston has quit @vote_leave and will be on the warpath tomorrow...

    That's news. I wonder why and over what?

    On wings we have this from @afneil
    https://twitter.com/afneil/status/740630793131859968
  • Options
    OUTOUT Posts: 569
    Hope no Airbus drops out of the sky. Would be very unfortunate.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    edited June 2016
    @alstewitn: I thought it was impressive 'fencing' from both sides, albeit with sabres rather than foils. https://t.co/f1YM60XvSn

    I guess Mr Stewart has fallen off Plato's timeline...
  • Options
    hunchmanhunchman Posts: 2,591
    The tweet about Johnny Mercer 48 hours ago is / was a bit of a lead:

    https://twitter.com/sarahwollaston?lang=en-gb
  • Options
    MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 37,686

    Jobabob said:

    Remain should bide their time. Don't preempt her!
    Indeed, I actually persuaded a voter to switch from Leave to Remain this evening.
    Maybe they just said it to make you go away.
    I've done that to an insistent Labour doorknocker before. "Yes, you've really made me realise that the Tories are all bastards and Ed Miliband will be a great PM".
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    Some light relief

    @oliverdarcy: Bloomberg: Some Trump advisors worried he will post VP announcement on Twitter w/o warning https://t.co/Q8D21Az69S https://t.co/WBBmoaAV9X
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 57,303
    She posted this less than eleven days ago, so would look a bit foolish:

    https://twitter.com/sarahwollaston/status/736577238485901313
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    And an argument Remain should have made, but didn't

    @JohnRentoul: The problems of immigration are the "first world problems" of success: Hamish McRae @IndyVoices https://t.co/SogdAnwQkE
  • Options
    HurstLlamaHurstLlama Posts: 9,098

    PlatoSaid said:

    Right, I have just set up and sent my first twat.

    How does this work? What do I do?

    Include a cat video
    Don't do cats!
    Well, puppies are OK too, or sheep.
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 36,411
    Scott_P said:

    Jobabob said:

    My missus is watching The Only Way is Essex so I missed Ozzy. Thankfully I have LeaveB.com to inform me that it was a car crash!!

    That appears to be the consensus view

    @MSmithsonPB: . @IsabelHardman Strangely Vote Leave is madly Tweeting that this was car crash for Osborne.

    If by consensus you mean people who hate Osborne
    About 80% of the voters hate Osborne. That's pretty close to a consensus.
  • Options
    fitalassfitalass Posts: 4,289
    Its been a long time coming, but finally Andrew Neil got George Osborne back in the hot seat, and I thought interview was excellent. Andrew Neil was as usual, extremely robust and well informed, by far our best political interviewer. Osborne also handled this very combative interview well, remaining calm and focused with the task in hand.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 115,950

    NEW THREAD NEW THREAD

  • Options
    BenedictWhiteBenedictWhite Posts: 1,944

    Scott_P said:

    I watched the Osborne interview before reading PB.

    I am SHIOCKED to find the Brexiteers thought Osborne did badly.

    Dont worry Scott on my pub gents straw poll it was 6-0 to Osborne is a wanker even among the regular Tory voters.
    He could have done worse but the remainers I know thing he's a w*nker let alone the leavers. They are less kind.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    Sean_F said:

    About 80% of the voters hate Osborne. That's pretty close to a consensus.

    Guess that's why the Tories didn't win a majority then.

    Oh, wait...
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 57,303
    PlatoSaid said:

    PlatoSaid said:

    Right, I have just set up and sent my first twat.

    How does this work? What do I do?

    Include a cat video
    Don't do cats!
    What's your Twitter name?
    Casinoroyalepb
  • Options
    AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 24,425
    MaxPB said:

    Shame about Wollaston, I agree with her about the £350m, I think it is the wrong figure and I don't think the leave camp should use it. The real figure of £200m is still large enough and is actually true. I don't see much difference between £350m per week or £200m per week in terms of shifting votes, it is unfortunate that the leave campaign have dug their heels in so much over the use of it, when they should have held their hands up and moved to the £200m per week figure when the ONS told them to.

    It's a brave move by Woollaston.

    She's now put herself in that awkward/principled squad box with the likes of Frank Field and Douglas Carswell. In parliamentary terms shes too much of a loose cannon for people to feel comfortable with but probably can be the type of crusading MP on an issue.
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,162
    Right, people. I am off. Be nice to one another, or the enormo-haddock will slap you about the head and neck.
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,523
    I actually think that Vote Leave are justified in using the gross figure, but I can certainly see the objections to it.

    What I can't understand is, why would that make someone decide to switch sides (if that is what she is going to do)?
  • Options
    HurstLlamaHurstLlama Posts: 9,098
    Error 404 showing for new thread
  • Options
    BenedictWhiteBenedictWhite Posts: 1,944
    Scott_P said:

    Ok, but what was your careful calm assessment of Osborne's performance and its effect?

    It will have no effect whatsoever

    But I thought he gave as good as he got. Compared to Hilary Benn it was a masterclass in dealing with Andrew Neil. I expect he is quite happy with it, as are others in my timeline (clearly I follow different people to Plato, although she regularly posts the same things I do...)

    Looking forward to IDS
    I don't agree, I thought Benn did as well as Osbourne. I was hoping for blood but didn't get any.

    They both look shifty on immigration though.
  • Options
    OUTOUT Posts: 569

    NEW THREAD NEW THREAD

    Another remain lie?
  • Options
    Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 61,058

    MaxPB said:

    Shame about Wollaston, I agree with her about the £350m, I think it is the wrong figure and I don't think the leave camp should use it. The real figure of £200m is still large enough and is actually true. I don't see much difference between £350m per week or £200m per week in terms of shifting votes, it is unfortunate that the leave campaign have dug their heels in so much over the use of it, when they should have held their hands up and moved to the £200m per week figure when the ONS told them to.

    It's a brave move by Woollaston.

    She's now put herself in that awkward/principled squad box with the likes of Frank Field and Douglas Carswell. In parliamentary terms shes too much of a loose cannon for people to feel comfortable with but probably can be the type of crusading MP on an issue.
    Next Health Secretary ?
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 57,303
    I'm not seeing this new thread?
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 50,974
    edited June 2016
    Oh crap, did I miss George Osborne getting his ar$e handed to him by Andrew Neil?
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 115,950

    NEW THREAD NEW THREAD - THIS TIME I MEAN IT

  • Options
    BenedictWhiteBenedictWhite Posts: 1,944

    Defect to whom?

    @JGForsyth: Unconfirmed rumours in Westminster tonight that @sarahwollaston is going to defect from Vote Leave tomorrow & criticise £350 million figure

    Well quite.

    She can't suddenly think the EU is so brilliant she wants to remain.

    I can understand walking out just not over. Perhaps to the other leave?
  • Options
    AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 24,425

    MaxPB said:

    Shame about Wollaston, I agree with her about the £350m, I think it is the wrong figure and I don't think the leave camp should use it. The real figure of £200m is still large enough and is actually true. I don't see much difference between £350m per week or £200m per week in terms of shifting votes, it is unfortunate that the leave campaign have dug their heels in so much over the use of it, when they should have held their hands up and moved to the £200m per week figure when the ONS told them to.

    It's a brave move by Woollaston.

    She's now put herself in that awkward/principled squad box with the likes of Frank Field and Douglas Carswell. In parliamentary terms shes too much of a loose cannon for people to feel comfortable with but probably can be the type of crusading MP on an issue.
    Next Health Secretary ?
    No.

    Shes put herself on the wrong side of Remain and Leave and would be too difficult to manage in a cabinet whoever wins. She could however make her name of specific NHS issues.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 57,303
    tlg86 said:

    I actually think that Vote Leave are justified in using the gross figure, but I can certainly see the objections to it.

    What I can't understand is, why would that make someone decide to switch sides (if that is what she is going to do)?

    I don't know what she'll do, but she may just abandon the campaign with a statement.

    If she does defect to Remain, I think that'll be viewed as quite cynical given her views up until now, which will then be thrown back at her.
  • Options
    AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 24,425
    edited June 2016

    tlg86 said:

    I actually think that Vote Leave are justified in using the gross figure, but I can certainly see the objections to it.

    What I can't understand is, why would that make someone decide to switch sides (if that is what she is going to do)?

    I don't know what she'll do, but she may just abandon the campaign with a statement.

    If she does defect to Remain, I think that'll be viewed as quite cynical given her views up until now, which will then be thrown back at her.
    If she defects to remain her integrity goes. Sajid Javid squared.

    The Tories are really not having a good campaign, reputations are being shredded.

    Meanwhile Jezza probably needs new bollocks as he's laughed the last lot off.
  • Options
    Interesting thoughts.

    @anandMenon1 says EU will be smaller in 30yrs time to @ITVAllegra https://www.facebook.com/itvnews/

    Allegra Stratton Retweeted
    UK in a Changing EU @UKandEU
    @angusarmstrong8 said he'd be surprised all countries in euro now will be in it in 5/6yrs @itvnews @ITVAllegra https://www.facebook.com/itvnews/
  • Options
    VapidBilgeVapidBilge Posts: 412
    edited June 2016
    TEST!
  • Options
    BenedictWhiteBenedictWhite Posts: 1,944

    Listening to DC yesterday and Geo Osborne tonight there seems to be a change in focus directed at Farage and trying to conflate Farage with Vote Leave. It will be interesting to see if this attack format intensifiies over the rest of the campaign

    I think that is the plan, which is why he isn't in Vote Leave, it allows plausible deniability of sorts.
  • Options
    BenedictWhiteBenedictWhite Posts: 1,944
    edited June 2016

    Interesting thoughts.

    @anandMenon1 says EU will be smaller in 30yrs time to @ITVAllegra https://www.facebook.com/itvnews/

    Allegra Stratton Retweeted
    UK in a Changing EU @UKandEU
    @angusarmstrong8 said he'd be surprised all countries in euro now will be in it in 5/6yrs @itvnews @ITVAllegra https://www.facebook.com/itvnews/

    As others have said we need two EU's. One ever closer one and the other never closer one.

    The former will lose members to the latter but that is better than what is happening now.
This discussion has been closed.