Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Wear and tear. The fate of Dominic Cummings

145791013

Comments

  • tysontyson Posts: 6,117

    OllyT said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    Sandpit said:

    Sandpit said:

    PB Tories calling out the hounding of Cummings is a noble thing to do, except they've never called out hounding of MPs on the other side.

    Yes we have.

    Also, Cummings is a civil servant, a member of staff not an elected politician.
    When?
    Personally, right back to Gordon Brown when he was PM, and Damien McBride was his media henchman who became the story.

    I don't ever recall such harassment of a civil servant as we've seen in the last couple of days though.
    Cummings is in reality much more political than civil. I don't think he'd wish to be thought anything else. But of course he shouldn't be harassed personally and picketing someone's home is always repulsive.
    Repulsive is very very generous- this is a culture war with the Puritains trying to burn their self anointed witch.

    Horrible narrow minded people.

    Scum actually.
    Up pops Harry now he's got something to use to try to deflect from Cumming's misdeeds. All fake outrage because a van parks outside the Cummings household, straw clutching at its finest
    That van was silly and childish and I cannot believe Starmer approved
    Big G- I think you might have to do a bit better than that to spread some muck on Keir....

    As I've said here, Keir really is the real deal...we are genuinely lucky that someone with his background wants to head a political party....

    I'm not a sycophant to politicians....I liked David Miliband...but I accept he was a career politician....I liked Charles Kennedy...but he had his demons.....I liked Ken Clarke......

    The politicians I like rarely come along
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,381

    Barnesian said:

    OllyT said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    Sandpit said:

    Sandpit said:

    PB Tories calling out the hounding of Cummings is a noble thing to do, except they've never called out hounding of MPs on the other side.

    Yes we have.

    Also, Cummings is a civil servant, a member of staff not an elected politician.
    When?
    Personally, right back to Gordon Brown when he was PM, and Damien McBride was his media henchman who became the story.

    I don't ever recall such harassment of a civil servant as we've seen in the last couple of days though.
    Cummings is in reality much more political than civil. I don't think he'd wish to be thought anything else. But of course he shouldn't be harassed personally and picketing someone's home is always repulsive.
    Repulsive is very very generous- this is a culture war with the Puritains trying to burn their self anointed witch.

    Horrible narrow minded people.

    Scum actually.
    Up pops Harry now he's got something to use to try to deflect from Cumming's misdeeds. All fake outrage because a van parks outside the Cummings household, straw clutching at its finest
    That van was silly and childish and I cannot believe Starmer approved
    Did he?
    Led by Donkeys is independent of the Labour Party. I suspect that Starmer would not approve of the stunt and certainly didn't approve it.
    Big G. is implying he might have.
    Not at all - but my wording was a bit ambiguous and I am sorry if that came over

    I do not believe Starmer would or did approve of the van
    I told you Cummings was safe earlier today! I have my hat and a knife and fork ready just in case!
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,992
    edited May 2020
    Afternoon team.

    Of course Boris will not sack Cummings.

    First, Cummings doesn't give a monkeys about the optics, secondly Boris would be literally unable to be PM without him, and finally like any government the more external pressure there is to do something, the less likely it is that they will do it.
  • YorkcityYorkcity Posts: 4,382

    Barnesian said:

    OllyT said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    Sandpit said:

    Sandpit said:

    PB Tories calling out the hounding of Cummings is a noble thing to do, except they've never called out hounding of MPs on the other side.

    Yes we have.

    Also, Cummings is a civil servant, a member of staff not an elected politician.
    When?
    Personally, right back to Gordon Brown when he was PM, and Damien McBride was his media henchman who became the story.

    I don't ever recall such harassment of a civil servant as we've seen in the last couple of days though.
    Cummings is in reality much more political than civil. I don't think he'd wish to be thought anything else. But of course he shouldn't be harassed personally and picketing someone's home is always repulsive.
    Repulsive is very very generous- this is a culture war with the Puritains trying to burn their self anointed witch.

    Horrible narrow minded people.

    Scum actually.
    Up pops Harry now he's got something to use to try to deflect from Cumming's misdeeds. All fake outrage because a van parks outside the Cummings household, straw clutching at its finest
    That van was silly and childish and I cannot believe Starmer approved
    Did he?
    Led by Donkeys is independent of the Labour Party. I suspect that Starmer would not approve of the stunt and certainly didn't approve it.
    Big G. is implying he might have.
    Yes Big g should provide evidence for this allegation.
  • Stark_DawningStark_Dawning Posts: 9,680
    If Cummings stays then Boris has to give the performance of a lifetime.
  • Ave_itAve_it Posts: 2,411
    DougSeal said:

    malcolmg said:

    DougSeal said:

    RobD said:

    malcolmg said:

    RobD said:

    malcolmg said:

    Scottish Conservatives FAIL to defend Scotland against pandemic!
    With his personal trust rating, in YouGov’s January poll, at only 8% and support for his party leader’s Coronavirus unlocking strategy at only 9% in May, Jackson Carlaw must now deal with two damning exposures of how his party’s handling of the crisis has clearly brought the deadly virus to Scotland in the early days of the outbreak.
    https://talkingupscotlandtwo.com/2020/05/23/scottish-conservatives-fail-to-defend-scotland-against-pandemic/

    Last time I checked the Tories weren't in power in Scotland. :o
    They run Scotland , I am sure you know the Tories run the UK Rob. Nice joke though.
    LOL. And what is Sturgeon doing?
    And there, in a nutshell, is the problem with devolution. Independence or Federalism are the only two realistic options. Don’t care which, but this sort of argument on a such a basic constitutional question, on an intelligent message board at that, sums up a lot.
    Power devolved is power retained, we are still a colony.
    No you’re not.
    Scotland want to take the money from London but don't want to take responsibility for their actions
  • OnlyLivingBoyOnlyLivingBoy Posts: 15,798
    Andy_JS said:

    "It is in the national interest for Dominic Cummings to stay
    Our society asks a lot of political leaders and their advisers. We should try to cut them some slack

    David Goodhart"

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/05/23/national-interest-dominic-cummings-stay/

    Goodhart is the Citizens of Somewhere Vs Citizens of Nowhere chap right? Cummings coming across as kind of Citizen of Nowhere, or at least, Citizen of both Islington and an impressive pile in County Durham. Still, fairly predictable that an OE like Goodhart thinks rules are only for the little people.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,601
    "Public urinals could be a thing of the past after coronavirus as experts
    recommend men and women use gender-neutral stalls with a one-way system

    The British Toilet Association are advising companies how to keep toilets safe
    Gender neutral toilets could be used with separate queues for men and women
    The change could be implemented on June 1 as many workers return to work"

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8351945/Drastic-changes-needed-public-toilets-pandemic-says-report.html
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 26,620
    tyson said:

    Yorkcity said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Mandelson was to Blair, what Cummings is to Johnson.

    Discuss.

    Mandelson was a competent cabinet minister.
    He was also a brilliant communicator.
    I think Mandelson and George Osborne are on par....I can hear TSE frothing at the mouth......both hated by their rivals because they were so good at their jobs....

    Little wonder they both ended up on an oligarchs boat sharing pleasantries....
    Mandelson had an attention to detail and a grasp of strategy which Osborne lacked.

    Whether that is a difference between two individuals or a difference between political generations is another question.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 51,878
    dixiedean said:

    OllyT said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    Sandpit said:

    Sandpit said:

    PB Tories calling out the hounding of Cummings is a noble thing to do, except they've never called out hounding of MPs on the other side.

    Yes we have.

    Also, Cummings is a civil servant, a member of staff not an elected politician.
    When?
    Personally, right back to Gordon Brown when he was PM, and Damien McBride was his media henchman who became the story.

    I don't ever recall such harassment of a civil servant as we've seen in the last couple of days though.
    Cummings is in reality much more political than civil. I don't think he'd wish to be thought anything else. But of course he shouldn't be harassed personally and picketing someone's home is always repulsive.
    Repulsive is very very generous- this is a culture war with the Puritains trying to burn their self anointed witch.

    Horrible narrow minded people.

    Scum actually.
    Up pops Harry now he's got something to use to try to deflect from Cumming's misdeeds. All fake outrage because a van parks outside the Cummings household, straw clutching at its finest
    That van was silly and childish and I cannot believe Starmer approved
    Did he?
    The van is nothing whatsoever to do with Labour or Starmer.

    Actually, another good day for Labour: they have been insisting all day that Boris should lead today's press conference, and he has obliged. If Cummings stays, even better.

    The self-discipline in Labour ranks at the moment is pretty impressive, and the lunatics are slowly but surely being marginalised completely.
    They aren't though. Sadly they are running the country.
    Typo for "ruining", surely :lol:
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 26,620
    Andy_JS said:

    "Public urinals could be a thing of the past after coronavirus as experts
    recommend men and women use gender-neutral stalls with a one-way system

    The British Toilet Association are advising companies how to keep toilets safe
    Gender neutral toilets could be used with separate queues for men and women
    The change could be implemented on June 1 as many workers return to work"

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8351945/Drastic-changes-needed-public-toilets-pandemic-says-report.html

    I doubt changing the bogs are high on many organisations list at the moment.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 63,102
    Yorkcity said:

    Barnesian said:

    OllyT said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    Sandpit said:

    Sandpit said:

    PB Tories calling out the hounding of Cummings is a noble thing to do, except they've never called out hounding of MPs on the other side.

    Yes we have.

    Also, Cummings is a civil servant, a member of staff not an elected politician.
    When?
    Personally, right back to Gordon Brown when he was PM, and Damien McBride was his media henchman who became the story.

    I don't ever recall such harassment of a civil servant as we've seen in the last couple of days though.
    Cummings is in reality much more political than civil. I don't think he'd wish to be thought anything else. But of course he shouldn't be harassed personally and picketing someone's home is always repulsive.
    Repulsive is very very generous- this is a culture war with the Puritains trying to burn their self anointed witch.

    Horrible narrow minded people.

    Scum actually.
    Up pops Harry now he's got something to use to try to deflect from Cumming's misdeeds. All fake outrage because a van parks outside the Cummings household, straw clutching at its finest
    That van was silly and childish and I cannot believe Starmer approved
    Did he?
    Led by Donkeys is independent of the Labour Party. I suspect that Starmer would not approve of the stunt and certainly didn't approve it.
    Big G. is implying he might have.
    Yes Big g should provide evidence for this allegation.
    I have apologised for my ambiguous comment and absolutely do not think Starmer had anything to do with it
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,381
    Yorkcity said:

    Barnesian said:

    OllyT said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    Sandpit said:

    Sandpit said:

    PB Tories calling out the hounding of Cummings is a noble thing to do, except they've never called out hounding of MPs on the other side.

    Yes we have.

    Also, Cummings is a civil servant, a member of staff not an elected politician.
    When?
    Personally, right back to Gordon Brown when he was PM, and Damien McBride was his media henchman who became the story.

    I don't ever recall such harassment of a civil servant as we've seen in the last couple of days though.
    Cummings is in reality much more political than civil. I don't think he'd wish to be thought anything else. But of course he shouldn't be harassed personally and picketing someone's home is always repulsive.
    Repulsive is very very generous- this is a culture war with the Puritains trying to burn their self anointed witch.

    Horrible narrow minded people.

    Scum actually.
    Up pops Harry now he's got something to use to try to deflect from Cumming's misdeeds. All fake outrage because a van parks outside the Cummings household, straw clutching at its finest
    That van was silly and childish and I cannot believe Starmer approved
    Did he?
    Led by Donkeys is independent of the Labour Party. I suspect that Starmer would not approve of the stunt and certainly didn't approve it.
    Big G. is implying he might have.
    Yes Big g should provide evidence for this allegation.
    In all fairness, as has been pointed out, I was mistaken, however I think G. might have been a little mischievous.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    Yorkcity said:

    Barnesian said:

    OllyT said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    Sandpit said:

    Sandpit said:

    PB Tories calling out the hounding of Cummings is a noble thing to do, except they've never called out hounding of MPs on the other side.

    Yes we have.

    Also, Cummings is a civil servant, a member of staff not an elected politician.
    When?
    Personally, right back to Gordon Brown when he was PM, and Damien McBride was his media henchman who became the story.

    I don't ever recall such harassment of a civil servant as we've seen in the last couple of days though.
    Cummings is in reality much more political than civil. I don't think he'd wish to be thought anything else. But of course he shouldn't be harassed personally and picketing someone's home is always repulsive.
    Repulsive is very very generous- this is a culture war with the Puritains trying to burn their self anointed witch.

    Horrible narrow minded people.

    Scum actually.
    Up pops Harry now he's got something to use to try to deflect from Cumming's misdeeds. All fake outrage because a van parks outside the Cummings household, straw clutching at its finest
    That van was silly and childish and I cannot believe Starmer approved
    Did he?
    Led by Donkeys is independent of the Labour Party. I suspect that Starmer would not approve of the stunt and certainly didn't approve it.
    Big G. is implying he might have.
    Yes Big g should provide evidence for this allegation.
    He wrote: I cannot believe Starmer approved

    It's unfortunate for Labour that the people who pulled the stunt used Labour's ad, perhaps they might like to distance themselves from it?
  • EPGEPG Posts: 6,652

    Andy_JS said:

    "It is in the national interest for Dominic Cummings to stay
    Our society asks a lot of political leaders and their advisers. We should try to cut them some slack

    David Goodhart"

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/05/23/national-interest-dominic-cummings-stay/

    Goodhart is the Citizens of Somewhere Vs Citizens of Nowhere chap right? Cummings coming across as kind of Citizen of Nowhere, or at least, Citizen of both Islington and an impressive pile in County Durham. Still, fairly predictable that an OE like Goodhart thinks rules are only for the little people.
    Right-wingers know their goose is cooked if Cummings can't legally appoint eugenicists and weirdos to oversee the civil service.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,482
    DougSeal said:

    malcolmg said:

    DougSeal said:

    RobD said:

    malcolmg said:

    RobD said:

    malcolmg said:

    Scottish Conservatives FAIL to defend Scotland against pandemic!
    With his personal trust rating, in YouGov’s January poll, at only 8% and support for his party leader’s Coronavirus unlocking strategy at only 9% in May, Jackson Carlaw must now deal with two damning exposures of how his party’s handling of the crisis has clearly brought the deadly virus to Scotland in the early days of the outbreak.
    https://talkingupscotlandtwo.com/2020/05/23/scottish-conservatives-fail-to-defend-scotland-against-pandemic/

    Last time I checked the Tories weren't in power in Scotland. :o
    They run Scotland , I am sure you know the Tories run the UK Rob. Nice joke though.
    LOL. And what is Sturgeon doing?
    And there, in a nutshell, is the problem with devolution. Independence or Federalism are the only two realistic options. Don’t care which, but this sort of argument on a such a basic constitutional question, on an intelligent message board at that, sums up a lot.
    Power devolved is power retained, we are still a colony.
    No you’re not.
    The colony is no less real for being in the mind. It might be even more real there, as it certainly wouldn't disappear with political separation,or any other change in real world circumstances.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    I'm currently translating new German legislation (some people have fun Sundays, y'know) which is quite interesting - they are envisaging the possibility of Covid medicines becoming available but difficult to produce in sufficient quantities, so the legislation gives the authorities to exempt both domestic and foreign pharmaceutical compsanies from all the usual requirements for production (GMP, package leaflet, labelling) and to waive their product liability for Covid products.

    What does 'waive product liability' mean ?

    Does it mean no responsibility for side effects ?
    As much responsibility as Grunenthal took for the thalidomide babies
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,036
    At least the London media bubble now know how far it is from London to Durham.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,226

    DougSeal said:
    I feel a Tammy Wynette song coming on!
    Her under-rated hit, "Useless fat liar defends the indefensible because laws are for the little people"? Always a crowd-pleaser.
    :smile: - Yes, that's a great song. Stripped down. Subversive. Before she sold out to Nashville.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 63,102
    tyson said:

    OllyT said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    Sandpit said:

    Sandpit said:

    PB Tories calling out the hounding of Cummings is a noble thing to do, except they've never called out hounding of MPs on the other side.

    Yes we have.

    Also, Cummings is a civil servant, a member of staff not an elected politician.
    When?
    Personally, right back to Gordon Brown when he was PM, and Damien McBride was his media henchman who became the story.

    I don't ever recall such harassment of a civil servant as we've seen in the last couple of days though.
    Cummings is in reality much more political than civil. I don't think he'd wish to be thought anything else. But of course he shouldn't be harassed personally and picketing someone's home is always repulsive.
    Repulsive is very very generous- this is a culture war with the Puritains trying to burn their self anointed witch.

    Horrible narrow minded people.

    Scum actually.
    Up pops Harry now he's got something to use to try to deflect from Cumming's misdeeds. All fake outrage because a van parks outside the Cummings household, straw clutching at its finest
    That van was silly and childish and I cannot believe Starmer approved
    Big G- I think you might have to do a bit better than that to spread some muck on Keir....

    As I've said here, Keir really is the real deal...we are genuinely lucky that someone with his background wants to head a political party....

    I'm not a sycophant to politicians....I liked David Miliband...but I accept he was a career politician....I liked Charles Kennedy...but he had his demons.....I liked Ken Clarke......

    The politicians I like rarely come along
    I did not have any intention of giving that impression

    I have apologised for my ambiguous comment

    Starmer would not be involved as fas as I am concerned
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,533
    IshmaelZ said:

    I'm currently translating new German legislation (some people have fun Sundays, y'know) which is quite interesting - they are envisaging the possibility of Covid medicines becoming available but difficult to produce in sufficient quantities, so the legislation gives the authorities to exempt both domestic and foreign pharmaceutical compsanies from all the usual requirements for production (GMP, package leaflet, labelling) and to waive their product liability for Covid products.

    What does 'waive product liability' mean ?

    Does it mean no responsibility for side effects ?
    Presumably, yes

    The UK has a scheme for no-faulty compensation paid by the state in vaccine damage cases:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccine_Damage_Payment

    Only applies to a list of named vaccines, not including Covid-19 vaccines. I wonder whether this will be added to the list.
    Yes, as I understand it (and I need to get it right since my translation will be the official English version). it means that if the authorities rush through your drug without all the usual checks, then you are not liable for side-effects unless you have introduced them deliberately or through gross negligence. The authorities will only give you this exemption if they are satisfied that the drug is OK for other reasons than the usual procedure - e.g. because it's been licenced successfully in Japan.
  • EPGEPG Posts: 6,652

    Yorkcity said:

    Barnesian said:

    OllyT said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    Sandpit said:

    Sandpit said:

    PB Tories calling out the hounding of Cummings is a noble thing to do, except they've never called out hounding of MPs on the other side.

    Yes we have.

    Also, Cummings is a civil servant, a member of staff not an elected politician.
    When?
    Personally, right back to Gordon Brown when he was PM, and Damien McBride was his media henchman who became the story.

    I don't ever recall such harassment of a civil servant as we've seen in the last couple of days though.
    Cummings is in reality much more political than civil. I don't think he'd wish to be thought anything else. But of course he shouldn't be harassed personally and picketing someone's home is always repulsive.
    Repulsive is very very generous- this is a culture war with the Puritains trying to burn their self anointed witch.

    Horrible narrow minded people.

    Scum actually.
    Up pops Harry now he's got something to use to try to deflect from Cumming's misdeeds. All fake outrage because a van parks outside the Cummings household, straw clutching at its finest
    That van was silly and childish and I cannot believe Starmer approved
    Did he?
    Led by Donkeys is independent of the Labour Party. I suspect that Starmer would not approve of the stunt and certainly didn't approve it.
    Big G. is implying he might have.
    Yes Big g should provide evidence for this allegation.
    He wrote: I cannot believe Starmer approved

    It's unfortunate for Labour that the people who pulled the stunt used Labour's ad, perhaps they might like to distance themselves from it?
    I am old enough to remember when Guido was daily pushing a fabrication that Gordon Brown was mentally ill and being secretly medicated in No 10. Did the Conservatives distance themselves? Course not, he was the iron fist and Dave was the velvet glove.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 41,999
    malcolmg said:

    If only people would say nice things about Boris rather than that pesky Scot. Unionists are pathetic insecure creatures.
    It's got the Yoons crawling out from beneath their news-avoiding rocks. I'm sure they'll be firing stiff letters off to STV and the government which licences them.

    Alternatively..

    https://twitter.com/trublu_80/status/1264564185456881666?s=20
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,413

    Andy_JS said:

    "Public urinals could be a thing of the past after coronavirus as experts
    recommend men and women use gender-neutral stalls with a one-way system

    The British Toilet Association are advising companies how to keep toilets safe
    Gender neutral toilets could be used with separate queues for men and women
    The change could be implemented on June 1 as many workers return to work"

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8351945/Drastic-changes-needed-public-toilets-pandemic-says-report.html

    I doubt changing the bogs are high on many organisations list at the moment.
    Well they ought to be. Places of business which provide toilets, particularly pubs and restaurants need to put some serious thought into it if they want to attract custom.
  • tysontyson Posts: 6,117

    tyson said:

    OllyT said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    Sandpit said:

    Sandpit said:

    PB Tories calling out the hounding of Cummings is a noble thing to do, except they've never called out hounding of MPs on the other side.

    Yes we have.

    Also, Cummings is a civil servant, a member of staff not an elected politician.
    When?
    Personally, right back to Gordon Brown when he was PM, and Damien McBride was his media henchman who became the story.

    I don't ever recall such harassment of a civil servant as we've seen in the last couple of days though.
    Cummings is in reality much more political than civil. I don't think he'd wish to be thought anything else. But of course he shouldn't be harassed personally and picketing someone's home is always repulsive.
    Repulsive is very very generous- this is a culture war with the Puritains trying to burn their self anointed witch.

    Horrible narrow minded people.

    Scum actually.
    Up pops Harry now he's got something to use to try to deflect from Cumming's misdeeds. All fake outrage because a van parks outside the Cummings household, straw clutching at its finest
    That van was silly and childish and I cannot believe Starmer approved
    Big G- I think you might have to do a bit better than that to spread some muck on Keir....

    As I've said here, Keir really is the real deal...we are genuinely lucky that someone with his background wants to head a political party....

    I'm not a sycophant to politicians....I liked David Miliband...but I accept he was a career politician....I liked Charles Kennedy...but he had his demons.....I liked Ken Clarke......

    The politicians I like rarely come along
    I did not have any intention of giving that impression

    I have apologised for my ambiguous comment

    Starmer would not be involved as fas as I am concerned
    Sorry...I read your post wrongly.....
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 26,620
    tyson said:

    OllyT said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    Sandpit said:

    Sandpit said:

    PB Tories calling out the hounding of Cummings is a noble thing to do, except they've never called out hounding of MPs on the other side.

    Yes we have.

    Also, Cummings is a civil servant, a member of staff not an elected politician.
    When?
    Personally, right back to Gordon Brown when he was PM, and Damien McBride was his media henchman who became the story.

    I don't ever recall such harassment of a civil servant as we've seen in the last couple of days though.
    Cummings is in reality much more political than civil. I don't think he'd wish to be thought anything else. But of course he shouldn't be harassed personally and picketing someone's home is always repulsive.
    Repulsive is very very generous- this is a culture war with the Puritains trying to burn their self anointed witch.

    Horrible narrow minded people.

    Scum actually.
    Up pops Harry now he's got something to use to try to deflect from Cumming's misdeeds. All fake outrage because a van parks outside the Cummings household, straw clutching at its finest
    That van was silly and childish and I cannot believe Starmer approved
    Big G- I think you might have to do a bit better than that to spread some muck on Keir....

    As I've said here, Keir really is the real deal...we are genuinely lucky that someone with his background wants to head a political party....

    I'm not a sycophant to politicians....I liked David Miliband...but I accept he was a career politician....I liked Charles Kennedy...but he had his demons.....I liked Ken Clarke......

    The politicians I like rarely come along
    Yet he has totally failed to exploit the governments bewildering incompetence on entry to the country.

    Something which would have been an easy vote winner in the areas which Labour has lost and would have made the government look weak now that it is proposing to implement some restrictions.

    That does suggest that Starmer is either a globalist sociopath or wishes to pander to such people.
  • EPGEPG Posts: 6,652
    Boris says: if you're about to be incapacitated, go for a 250 mile drive.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,139
    Boris speaking now and says Cummings followed parental inclinations and acted responsibly
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,413
    Followed the instincts of every Father and parent.
    Apart from those who didn't of course.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,468
    EPG said:

    Boris says: if you're about to be incapacitated, go for a 250 mile drive.

    :D:D:D
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,482

    malcolmg said:

    If only people would say nice things about Boris rather than that pesky Scot. Unionists are pathetic insecure creatures.
    It's got the Yoons crawling out from beneath their news-avoiding rocks. I'm sure they'll be firing stiff letters off to STV and the government which licences them.

    Alternatively..

    https://twitter.com/trublu_80/status/1264564185456881666?s=20
    You surely cringed when watching?
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 22,837
    Well thats the biggest mistake of his career.
  • Ave_itAve_it Posts: 2,411
    Boris has spoken. Ok hard letters on here can froth for the rest of the bank holiday weekend!
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,766
    edited May 2020
    Johnson backs Cummings. He did what any father would do.

    Twats.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 63,102
    Boris out of breath and not convincing me
  • BluestBlueBluestBlue Posts: 4,556
    edited May 2020
    Well done, Boris! Bloody well done! :smile:
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 36,002
    Hey voters

    GO FUCK YOURSELVES !!!
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 51,878
    HYUFD said:

    Boris speaking now and says Cummings followed parental inclinations and acted responsibly

    But he broke the government's own rules :lol:
  • RochdalePioneersRochdalePioneers Posts: 28,902
    Glad to see Boris double down. Will be fantastic to see his opening statement torn apart once the questions start
  • BannedinnParisBannedinnParis Posts: 1,884

    Andy_JS said:

    "Public urinals could be a thing of the past after coronavirus as experts
    recommend men and women use gender-neutral stalls with a one-way system

    The British Toilet Association are advising companies how to keep toilets safe
    Gender neutral toilets could be used with separate queues for men and women
    The change could be implemented on June 1 as many workers return to work"

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8351945/Drastic-changes-needed-public-toilets-pandemic-says-report.html

    I doubt changing the bogs are high on many organisations list at the moment.
    not changing but they're going to be one of the 'bottle necks' in how we return from lockdown.

    can see more toilet attendants in the future - people may well want a thorough clean of the facilities after each use to feel safe.
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541

    Well done, Boris! Bloody well done! :smile:

    Agreed. He has just handed the Opposition four years worth of attack lines. I am delighted,
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,766
    dixiedean said:

    Followed the instincts of every Father and parent.
    Apart from those who didn't of course.

    You mean millions of them.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,468
    Ave_it said:

    Boris has spoken. Ok hard letters on here can froth for the rest of the bank holiday weekend!

    Also plenty of Tory MPs and Tory voters.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    So I gave a good tip for the wrong reasons.

    I'll take that!
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541
    This is brilliant for SKS
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,226
    Chris said:

    kinabalu said:

    The Sun on Twitter have been briefed that 'the PM believes it is case closed', a viewpoint which can only be described as, at best, optimistic.

    He will be "spending" some of that 80 seat majority here but as long as he is prepared to he can. Dom stays. No inquiry. Fuck off.
    So what line will he take with the questions?

    "I'm not going to waste my time replying"?
    We are about to find out.

    Opening statement will not convince anybody with a brain cell obviously.
  • BluestBlueBluestBlue Posts: 4,556
    DougSeal said:

    Well done, Boris! Bloody well done! :smile:

    Agreed. He has just handed the Opposition four years worth of attack lines. I am delighted,
    And after 4 years of frothing, hyperbolic onanism, that Opposition will still lose.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,766
    Translation: After extensive discussions with Mr Cummings, I came to the conclusion that I could not govern without him.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,468
    I’d love it if the Guardian/Mirror were holding back something for this exact scenario.
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 26,620
    dixiedean said:

    Andy_JS said:

    "Public urinals could be a thing of the past after coronavirus as experts
    recommend men and women use gender-neutral stalls with a one-way system

    The British Toilet Association are advising companies how to keep toilets safe
    Gender neutral toilets could be used with separate queues for men and women
    The change could be implemented on June 1 as many workers return to work"

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8351945/Drastic-changes-needed-public-toilets-pandemic-says-report.html

    I doubt changing the bogs are high on many organisations list at the moment.
    Well they ought to be. Places of business which provide toilets, particularly pubs and restaurants need to put some serious thought into it if they want to attract custom.
    Getting rid of the bacteria blowers and providing paper towels would be a good thing.

    But spending thousands on remodelling the system might not be possible for many places.

    Personally I tried to avoid such places previously.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,766
    The dead cat heads for the table folks.

    Kids and schools.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 22,837

    Boris out of breath and not convincing me

    He even teed up the whole problem in his opening couple of sentences, that is what people will remember!
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,766

    I’d love it if the Guardian/Mirror were holding back something for this exact scenario.

    I cannot wait for 10pm tonight.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 51,878
    Andy_JS said:

    "Public urinals could be a thing of the past after coronavirus as experts
    recommend men and women use gender-neutral stalls with a one-way system

    The British Toilet Association are advising companies how to keep toilets safe
    Gender neutral toilets could be used with separate queues for men and women
    The change could be implemented on June 1 as many workers return to work"

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8351945/Drastic-changes-needed-public-toilets-pandemic-says-report.html

    With a cubicle, you have to touch the door handle, door lock, the seat and the flush!
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,751
    HYUFD said:

    Boris speaking now and says Cummings followed parental inclinations and acted responsibly

    By driving to the other end of the country with someone with coronavirus in the passenger seat.

    Well, well, well.
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527

    Phil said:

    malcolmg said:

    malcolmg said:

    EPG said:

    EPG said:

    Sandpit said:

    Scott_xP said:
    Rather unpleasant.

    I don't think Boris should accept Cummings resignation even if it were offered now.
    https://twitter.com/BBCJonSopel/status/1264541975748980736
    If that's Labour it's their first mis-step in this - it will allow Tories to go on the attack about "harassing 4 year olds and their mothers" - especially since Cummings is reportedly in Downing St.
    Live by the sword. Anyway, Cummings brought his child into it when he told his staff in Cabinet to defend him with the kid.
    That Sir is rubbish!
    Yeah, but that's politics now. One side had 10 years of using both the velvet glove and the iron fist, like Vote Leave and Leave.EU, so if the other side is fighting back with two hands as well, we can't really be surprised.
    I have no problem with your desire to take down Cummings. His wife and child are not acceptable collateral damage.
    Live by the sword..............he reaps what he sows, in his immortal words who cares what he thinks
    I don't care what he thinks Malcolm, but his child did not ask to have such a hideous oik for a father so the child should be left out of all the nastiness.
    I agree Pete, but it is Cummings fault , as I said he is reaping what he sows to the detriment of his family.
    It is interesting that those on here most vociferous in their defence of Cummings' family (myself excluded) were quite happy to beat up on Mrs Starmer Senior and her donkeys.
    As I am certainly not defending Cummings, may I ask what the story is about Mrs Starmer and her donkeys? That one completely passed me by.
    It was a Daily Mail front page article on Kier Starmer a week or two ago: Headline something like "Starmer owns land worth up to £10milllion".

    Actual story is: Starmer owns green belt land next to his mother’s house that he bought for her donkey sanctuary. It’s worth maybe £20k tops.

    Build a bunch of houses on it & you could probably sell them all for £10million total but a) that requires you to get planning permission on the green belt & b) to pay to build the houses in the first place. "Up to" was doing an awful lot of work in that headline.

    (Actual £ figures may vary, but general principle is accurate to my recollection.)
    The fact his mother owns a donkey sanctuary is the first thing I've heard about him that improves my view of him.
    Owned. I believe she is no longer with us
    I believe his mother is still alive - his father passed away a few years ago.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,805
    Mr. Meeks, reminds me of when I tipped Perez because I didn't realise his odds were long due to a penalty (and the bet came off).

    Wonder if this'll bring Johnson down.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,139
    Boris says we are ready to move to step 2 and reopening reception and primary schools in full on June 1st with secondary schools reopening on June 15th for exam preparation.

  • MonkeysMonkeys Posts: 757
    So us spectators have learnt nothing from the prorogation?
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 63,102
    DougSeal said:

    Well done, Boris! Bloody well done! :smile:

    Agreed. He has just handed the Opposition four years worth of attack lines. I am delighted,
    This will not be an issue in four years, but many more will be

  • eekeek Posts: 28,405
    edited May 2020

    DougSeal said:

    Well done, Boris! Bloody well done! :smile:

    Agreed. He has just handed the Opposition four years worth of attack lines. I am delighted,
    And after 4 years of frothing, hyperbolic onanism, that Opposition will still lose.
    Nope, for 4 years it will be remember when you couldn't see your family and friends.

    Thanks for doing that so we didn't have to.

    This is going to continue to build up momentum..
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541
    Ave_it said:

    Boris has spoken. Ok hard letters on here can froth for the rest of the bank holiday weekend!

    Which letters do you find hard? Personally I struggle with “Q”. I mean, what’s the point of a letter that has to be accompanied by another one the whole time?
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,533

    Ave_it said:

    Boris has spoken. Ok hard letters on here can froth for the rest of the bank holiday weekend!

    Also plenty of Tory MPs and Tory voters.
    What makes one a hard letter?
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541

    DougSeal said:

    Well done, Boris! Bloody well done! :smile:

    Agreed. He has just handed the Opposition four years worth of attack lines. I am delighted,
    And after 4 years of frothing, hyperbolic onanism, that Opposition will still lose.
    That’s where we differ. He is toast.
  • tysontyson Posts: 6,117

    Well done, Boris! Bloody well done! :smile:

    Boris's ERM moment....the press have got huge buckets of shit that are going to be liberally thrown over him.....
  • Ave_itAve_it Posts: 2,411
    Good to see Boris sticking with getting the schools back
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    Chris said:

    From the BBC:
    "Americans are being warned to be wary of hungry rats journalists who have become angry due to a lack of their usual restaurant food to feast on during the coronavirus lockdown.
    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said there had been "reports of unusual or aggressive rodent behaviour" due to a decrease in food available, "especially in dense commercial areas"."

    Fixed it for you
  • Thanks for the free poll bounce Johnson!
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 22,837
    HYUFD said:

    Boris says we are ready to move to step 2 and reopening reception and primary schools in full on June 1st with secondary schools reopening on June 15th for exam preparation.

    And parents will do they think whats best for their kid and not send them to school. I wonder why........
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,139
    Boris says a statement this week on reopening non essential retail shops
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 51,878

    Well done, Boris! Bloody well done! :smile:

    Still defending the indefensible, I see :lol:
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 22,837

    I’d love it if the Guardian/Mirror were holding back something for this exact scenario.

    Another minister doing similar perhaps?
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 63,102

    DougSeal said:

    Well done, Boris! Bloody well done! :smile:

    Agreed. He has just handed the Opposition four years worth of attack lines. I am delighted,
    And after 4 years of frothing, hyperbolic onanism, that Opposition will still lose.
    That is not at all certain, but this will not be relevant, the way we come out of lockdown and the economic consequences will decide 2024 GE
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,226

    tyson said:

    OllyT said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    Sandpit said:

    Sandpit said:

    PB Tories calling out the hounding of Cummings is a noble thing to do, except they've never called out hounding of MPs on the other side.

    Yes we have.

    Also, Cummings is a civil servant, a member of staff not an elected politician.
    When?
    Personally, right back to Gordon Brown when he was PM, and Damien McBride was his media henchman who became the story.

    I don't ever recall such harassment of a civil servant as we've seen in the last couple of days though.
    Cummings is in reality much more political than civil. I don't think he'd wish to be thought anything else. But of course he shouldn't be harassed personally and picketing someone's home is always repulsive.
    Repulsive is very very generous- this is a culture war with the Puritains trying to burn their self anointed witch.

    Horrible narrow minded people.

    Scum actually.
    Up pops Harry now he's got something to use to try to deflect from Cumming's misdeeds. All fake outrage because a van parks outside the Cummings household, straw clutching at its finest
    That van was silly and childish and I cannot believe Starmer approved
    Big G- I think you might have to do a bit better than that to spread some muck on Keir....

    As I've said here, Keir really is the real deal...we are genuinely lucky that someone with his background wants to head a political party....

    I'm not a sycophant to politicians....I liked David Miliband...but I accept he was a career politician....I liked Charles Kennedy...but he had his demons.....I liked Ken Clarke......

    The politicians I like rarely come along
    Yet he has totally failed to exploit the governments bewildering incompetence on entry to the country.

    Something which would have been an easy vote winner in the areas which Labour has lost and would have made the government look weak now that it is proposing to implement some restrictions.

    That does suggest that Starmer is either a globalist sociopath or wishes to pander to such people.
    Are you a moron?
  • HYUFD said:

    Boris says we are ready to move to step 2 and reopening reception and primary schools in full on June 1st with secondary schools reopening on June 15th for exam preparation.

    That isn't what he said.

    Some primaries will be able to take R, Y1 and Y6. Some will not.

    The aim is for Secondaries to have 'some face to face contact' with Y10 and Y12 from 15th.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,468
    I notice he hasn’t said “stay at home” once.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 51,878
    HYUFD said:
    Hillary got 48% compared to Trump's 46%.
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830

    Translation: After extensive discussions with Mr Cummings, I came to the conclusion that I could not govern without him.

    he came to the conclusion that I could not govern without him, surely?
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,766
    We must keep R below, so we must all...

    Drive to Barnard Castle.
  • Peter_the_PunterPeter_the_Punter Posts: 14,354
    DougSeal said:

    Ave_it said:

    Boris has spoken. Ok hard letters on here can froth for the rest of the bank holiday weekend!

    Which letters do you find hard? Personally I struggle with “Q”. I mean, what’s the point of a letter that has to be accompanied by another one the whole time?
    P is awkward because of the lavatorial connotations.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,405
    edited May 2020

    DougSeal said:

    Well done, Boris! Bloody well done! :smile:

    Agreed. He has just handed the Opposition four years worth of attack lines. I am delighted,
    This will not be an issue in four years, but many more will be

    Oh it will be come the next election, remember the family funeral you couldn't attend because of the virus that their incompetency brought into the nursing home which killed Nanny. 60,000 excess deaths is 600,000 people with reasons not to vote for Boris when the truth comes out.

    And I suspect there will be a lot more, as the economy is going to collapse on it's arse.

    But manufacturing and co will have no reason to try to fix things as the uncertainty of next January is going to make investment impossible,
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 63,102

    HYUFD said:

    Boris says we are ready to move to step 2 and reopening reception and primary schools in full on June 1st with secondary schools reopening on June 15th for exam preparation.

    That isn't what he said.

    Some primaries will be able to take R, Y1 and Y6. Some will not.

    The aim is for Secondaries to have 'some face to face contact' with Y10 and Y12 from 15th.
    Yes - you are correct
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 51,878

    I notice he hasn’t said “stay at home” once.

    That's merely because he's staying alert!
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 51,878
    IshmaelZ said:

    Translation: After extensive discussions with Mr Cummings, I came to the conclusion that I could not govern without him.

    he came to the conclusion that I could not govern without him, surely?
    Surely with the next election 4 years away, Boris can afford to sack Dom?
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,176

    I notice he hasn’t said “stay at home” once.

    To be fair, I think that stopped a few weeks ago.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,381

    Thanks for the free poll bounce Johnson!

    You will need more popcorn!
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,413

    I notice he hasn’t said “stay at home” once.

    Nor Stay Alert. After all you might spot government advisers on a jolly.
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 26,620

    Andy_JS said:

    "Public urinals could be a thing of the past after coronavirus as experts
    recommend men and women use gender-neutral stalls with a one-way system

    The British Toilet Association are advising companies how to keep toilets safe
    Gender neutral toilets could be used with separate queues for men and women
    The change could be implemented on June 1 as many workers return to work"

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8351945/Drastic-changes-needed-public-toilets-pandemic-says-report.html

    I doubt changing the bogs are high on many organisations list at the moment.
    not changing but they're going to be one of the 'bottle necks' in how we return from lockdown.

    can see more toilet attendants in the future - people may well want a thorough clean of the facilities after each use to feel safe.
    Indeed.

    Alternatively fewer people might go out for multiple drinks and stick to what their bladder can contain before they can return home.
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,708
    Good fall in number in hospital.

    9,335 yesterday

    8,951 today
  • humbuggerhumbugger Posts: 377

    IshmaelZ said:

    Translation: After extensive discussions with Mr Cummings, I came to the conclusion that I could not govern without him.

    he came to the conclusion that I could not govern without him, surely?
    Surely with the next election 4 years away, Boris can afford to sack Dom?
    Yes, but with the next election 4 years away he can also afford not to sack him.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,766
    tyson said:

    Well done, Boris! Bloody well done! :smile:

    Boris's ERM moment....the press have got huge buckets of shit that are going to be liberally thrown over him.....
    Quite possible that this weekend will be seen by historians as the moment they lost the 2024 GE.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,563
    edited May 2020
    dixiedean said:

    Followed the instincts of every Father and parent.
    Apart from those who didn't of course.

    As I said yesterday the problem is not following the instincts of every parent. It is failing to realise that having done that his position in Government a was untenable.

    To put it in purely political terms. If he had announced at the time that he had done something he felt he had to do for his family but that he recognised it was damaging to the message the Government were trying to project and that for the good of the country he was resigning then, apart from the loons who hold an irrational hatred for him, most people would have agreed he had behaved correctly and he would have garnered a lot of sympathy. Chances are that within a year or so he would have been back again.

    Instead he has chosen a route which might save his job but which may well cost lives as people decide the Lockdown naysayers are right and use him as an example of why they should ignore the rules. Hugely damaging for the country - by which I mean the people themselves.
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 26,620
    DougSeal said:

    Ave_it said:

    Boris has spoken. Ok hard letters on here can froth for the rest of the bank holiday weekend!

    Which letters do you find hard? Personally I struggle with “Q”. I mean, what’s the point of a letter that has to be accompanied by another one the whole time?
    Perhaps the history of recent decades might have been different if Iraq had been Iraqu.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 41,999

    Johnson backs Cummings. He did what any father would do.

    Twats.

    Is it clear yet whether he did what any father would do twice or three times (with concomitant return journeys of course)?
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,381
    Johnson has thrown primary school children and teachers under the bus to save Dom. Nice work!
  • eekeek Posts: 28,405

    DougSeal said:

    Well done, Boris! Bloody well done! :smile:

    Agreed. He has just handed the Opposition four years worth of attack lines. I am delighted,
    And after 4 years of frothing, hyperbolic onanism, that Opposition will still lose.
    That is not at all certain, but this will not be relevant, the way we come out of lockdown and the economic consequences will decide 2024 GE
    He's screwed then
  • Labour probably can't believe their luck.

    An out of touch elite with one rule for them and one rule for us, I bet Keir couldn't have dreamed of a better start.
This discussion has been closed.