Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » All the signs are that turnout is down markedly

12357

Comments

  • Options
    DruttDrutt Posts: 1,093
    One LD gain, one CON gain, one UKIP gain.

    All from LAB. Hey ho.
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,446
    AndyJS said:

    > @Sunil_Prasannan said:

    > BBC just said Lab lost a seat to Con?



    In Sunderland.

    Thanks
  • Options
    DoubleDDoubleD Posts: 63
    Oh no, gonna have to stay up all night. Popcorn time!
  • Options
    dyedwooliedyedwoolie Posts: 7,786
    Greens might have a Sunderland gain - recount
  • Options
    TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Mill field !!
  • Options
    Thayer5Thayer5 Posts: 97
    It would appear the voters of Sunderland aren't especially worried about their Nissan factory.
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,823
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    Labour have lost a seat to each of the Tories, LDs, Greens and UKIP in Sunderland.
  • Options
    KentRisingKentRising Posts: 2,850
    Another Lib Dem gain in Sunderland. Labour are all over the show here. But what does it mean regarding their ref stance? Lib Dems are federalists!
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,990
    > @DoubleD said:
    > Oh no, gonna have to stay up all night. Popcorn time!

    Was there ever any doubt?
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,144
    > @KentRising said:
    > What's the "scandal" for Labour in Sunderland?

    They've tried to bollocks Brexit.....
  • Options
    TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Lots of Jews in Sunderland ?

    Labour getting a fisting.
  • Options
    El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 3,880
    FFS. I thought I was going to get an early night.

    Also I didn't get any booze in.
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,823
    > @Thayer5 said:
    > It would appear the voters of Sunderland aren't especially worried about their Nissan factory.

    Some seem more bothered than others.
  • Options
    The_ApocalypseThe_Apocalypse Posts: 7,830

    > @KentRising said:

    > What's the "scandal" for Labour in Sunderland?



    They've tried to bollocks Brexit.....

    I think this might have a part to play:

    https://twitter.com/stephenkb/status/1124076786269216768?s=21
  • Options
    AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    the second LD gain was a given. They won by a landslide also last year in that ward

    > @KentRising said:
    > Another Lib Dem gain in Sunderland. Labour are all over the show here. But what does it mean regarding their ref stance? Lib Dems are federalists!
  • Options
    Thayer5Thayer5 Posts: 97
    > @Foxy said:
    > > @Thayer5 said:
    > > It would appear the voters of Sunderland aren't especially worried about their Nissan factory.
    >
    > Some seem more bothered than others.

    Same for Swindon though, despite Honda?

    https://twitter.com/kevina364/status/1124082477038018561

    The Brexiteers are VERY Brexity.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,048

    Thayer5 said:
    According to Stephen Bush, Labour are expected to do worse in Sunderland because there is a lot of issues with the council there.
    Probably true, and they have a high position to fall from there, as Tories do elsewhere. Still, always nice to start the night off with some massive swings or shock results.
  • Options
    dyedwooliedyedwoolie Posts: 7,786
    BBC report con gain from lab in a ward in Swindon never held by the blues
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,823
    > @El_Capitano said:
    > FFS. I thought I was going to get an early night.
    >
    > Also I didn't get any booze in.

    Cheese, biscuits and an attack on the liquor cupboard, it is election night on PB!
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,967
    > @kle4 said:
    > > @kle4 said:
    >
    > > I love the smell of fear in the early hours.....
    >
    > >
    >
    > > https://twitter.com/siennamarla/status/1124079140754395144
    >
    >
    >
    > >
    >
    > >
    >
    > >
    >
    > > Maybe, but Sunderland results really are not always a great predictor, so excuse or not it might be right.
    >
    > >
    >
    > > UKIP, either for themselves or because BP are not there, surprising given their showing last year though.
    >
    >
    >
    > Remember: Sunderland was a great predictor for the Brexit referendum......
    >
    > True enough, I guess we need to see some results in the Tory shires to see if Sunderland is reflective of things yet.

    It looks like the Tories will be put to the sword in Cotswold (remain) while doing well in neighbouring Swindon (leave) where they've just gained one.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,048

    FFS. I thought I was going to get an early night.

    Also I didn't get any booze in.

    The true political wonk gets drunk on election results alone, sir.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,144
    > @El_Capitano said:
    > FFS. I thought I was going to get an early night.
    >
    > Also I didn't get any booze in.

    Or popcorn....
  • Options
    AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    edited May 2019
    South Tyneside - Harton

    Lab 1014
    UKIP 719
    Con 462


    Cleadon Park

    Lab 714
    Greesn 499
    Con 412
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,048
    Thayer5 said:

    > @Foxy said:

    > > @Thayer5 said:

    > > It would appear the voters of Sunderland aren't especially worried about their Nissan factory.

    >

    > Some seem more bothered than others.



    Same for Swindon though, despite Honda?







    The Brexiteers are VERY Brexity.
    Swindon is determined to make me look silly, I told plenty of people at the office I expected Labour to make gains there.
  • Options
    dyedwooliedyedwoolie Posts: 7,786
    > @Thayer5 said:
    > > @Foxy said:
    > > > @Thayer5 said:
    > > > It would appear the voters of Sunderland aren't especially worried about their Nissan factory.
    > >
    > > Some seem more bothered than others.
    >
    > Same for Swindon though, despite Honda?
    >
    > https://twitter.com/kevina364/status/1124082477038018561
    >
    > The Brexiteers are VERY Brexity.

    Never held by con before
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,048
    Sean_F said:

    > @kle4 said:

    > > @kle4 said:

    >

    > > I love the smell of fear in the early hours.....

    >

    > >

    >

    > >



    >

    >

    >

    > >

    >

    > >

    >

    > >

    >

    > > Maybe, but Sunderland results really are not always a great predictor, so excuse or not it might be right.

    >

    > >

    >

    > > UKIP, either for themselves or because BP are not there, surprising given their showing last year though.

    >

    >

    >

    > Remember: Sunderland was a great predictor for the Brexit referendum......

    >

    > True enough, I guess we need to see some results in the Tory shires to see if Sunderland is reflective of things yet.



    It looks like the Tories will be put to the sword in Cotswold (remain) while doing well in neighbouring Swindon (leave) where they've just gained one.
    Swindon was only marginally leave I would have thought, given Wiltshire as a whole was 52:48.
  • Options
    El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 3,880
    Thayer5 said:
    Interesting given https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-wiltshire-48036203 on this ward:

    "A Labour local election candidate has apologised for sharing Facebook posts describing links with her party to anti-Semitism as a 'smear campaign'."
  • Options
    The_ApocalypseThe_Apocalypse Posts: 7,830
    kle4 said:

    Thayer5 said:

    > @Foxy said:

    > > @Thayer5 said:

    > > It would appear the voters of Sunderland aren't especially worried about their Nissan factory.

    >

    > Some seem more bothered than others.



    Same for Swindon though, despite Honda?







    The Brexiteers are VERY Brexity.
    Swindon is determined to make me look silly, I told plenty of people at the office I expected Labour to make gains there.
    Here’s another result from Swindon: https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1124078783835848708?s=21

    I guess time will tell how it goes for Labour there.
  • Options
    nunuonenunuone Posts: 1,138
    This is the most interesting local elections in a while.
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,446
    edited May 2019
    kle4 said:

    FFS. I thought I was going to get an early night.

    Also I didn't get any booze in.

    The true political wonk gets drunk on election results alone, sir.
    I think @El_Capitano meant "boos" when results don't go the way he wanted?
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,823
    > @dyedwoolie said:
    > > @Thayer5 said:
    > > > @Foxy said:
    > > > > @Thayer5 said:
    > > > > It would appear the voters of Sunderland aren't especially worried about their Nissan factory.
    > > >
    > > > Some seem more bothered than others.
    > >
    > > Same for Swindon though, despite Honda?
    > >
    > > https://twitter.com/kevina364/status/1124082477038018561
    > >
    > > The Brexiteers are VERY Brexity.
    >
    > Never held by con before

    Lab councillor went Indy and split the vote according to the BBC
  • Options
    El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 3,880
    And with beautiful timing, my iTunes has just cued up the right bit of Duruflé's Requiem:

    "Dies iræ, dies illa". Or in the English paraphrase, "Day of wrath and doom impending"...
  • Options
    NemtynakhtNemtynakht Posts: 2,311
    > @rottenborough said:
    > Yep, panic setting in:
    >
    > https://twitter.com/OwenJones84/status/1124082593618649088
    >
    >

    He is an idiot- get out of your self congratulatory Twitter left wing m3dia bubble and see what the rest of the world is like
  • Options
    Ishmael_ZIshmael_Z Posts: 8,981
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/05/02/gavin-williamson-allies-reveal-evidence-confronted-theresa-may/

    Claim by Williamson that the only evidence against him is the fact of his 11 minute call to the telegraph.
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,917
    Barry Gardner waffling about nothing on the BBC...
  • Options
    another_richardanother_richard Posts: 25,132
    > @kle4 said:
    > > @kle4 said:
    >
    > > > @kle4 said:
    >
    > >
    >
    > > > I love the smell of fear in the early hours.....
    >
    > >
    >
    > > >
    >
    > >
    >
    > > > https://twitter.com/siennamarla/status/1124079140754395144
    >
    >
    >
    > >
    >
    > >
    >
    > >
    >
    > > >
    >
    > >
    >
    > > >
    >
    > >
    >
    > > >
    >
    > >
    >
    > > > Maybe, but Sunderland results really are not always a great predictor, so excuse or not it might be right.
    >
    > >
    >
    > > >
    >
    > >
    >
    > > > UKIP, either for themselves or because BP are not there, surprising given their showing last year though.
    >
    > >
    >
    > >
    >
    > >
    >
    > > Remember: Sunderland was a great predictor for the Brexit referendum......
    >
    > >
    >
    > > True enough, I guess we need to see some results in the Tory shires to see if Sunderland is reflective of things yet.
    >
    >
    >
    > It looks like the Tories will be put to the sword in Cotswold (remain) while doing well in neighbouring Swindon (leave) where they've just gained one.
    >
    > Swindon was only marginally leave I would have thought, given Wiltshire as a whole was 52:48.

    Swindon and Wiltshire are separate councils.
  • Options
    Thayer5Thayer5 Posts: 97
    So far an intriguingly bad night for Labour, an unexpectedly meh night for the Tories, a rather good night for the LDs.... and I can hear Nigel Farage chortling as I type.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,990
    edited May 2019
    Is that the good ship May I see, sailing serenely on? :p
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 28,013
    Re Huawei. Best, closest pronunciation is Whah (Scots wh sound) way as in a street. Quote function crashing my site on IPad quicker than the Labour vote in Sunderland.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,048
    Foxy said:

    > @dyedwoolie said:

    > > @Thayer5 said:

    > > > @Foxy said:

    > > > > @Thayer5 said:

    > > > > It would appear the voters of Sunderland aren't especially worried about their Nissan factory.

    > > >

    > > > Some seem more bothered than others.

    > >

    > > Same for Swindon though, despite Honda?

    > >

    > >



    > >

    > > The Brexiteers are VERY Brexity.

    >

    > Never held by con before



    Lab councillor went Indy and split the vote according to the BBC
    Oh right, that was the one who claimed the Lab party punished her for not helping out with canvassing or something when she had a broken arm
  • Options
    SirBenjaminSirBenjamin Posts: 238
    > @El_Capitano said:
    > And with beautiful timing, my iTunes has just cued up the right bit of Duruflé's Requiem:
    >
    > "Dies iræ, dies illa". Or in the English paraphrase, "Day of wrath and doom impending"...


    The 7th best Requiem ever composed.
  • Options
    GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,094
    GIN1138 said:

    Barry Gardner waffling about nothing on the BBC...

    What else is new?
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,068
    > @Sean_F said:
    > It looks like the Tories will be put to the sword in Cotswold (remain) while doing well in neighbouring Swindon (leave) where they've just gained one.

    That would be a tough set of results for them.
  • Options
    ralphmalphralphmalph Posts: 2,201
    edited May 2019
    > @kle4 said:
    > > @kle4 said:
    >
    > > > @kle4 said:
    >
    > >
    >
    > > > I love the smell of fear in the early hours.....
    >
    > >
    >
    > > >
    >
    > >
    >
    > > > https://twitter.com/siennamarla/status/1124079140754395144
    >
    >
    >
    > >
    >
    > >
    >
    > >
    >
    > > >
    >
    > >
    >
    > > >
    >
    > >
    >
    > > >
    >
    > >
    >
    > > > Maybe, but Sunderland results really are not always a great predictor, so excuse or not it might be right.
    >
    > >
    >
    > > >
    >
    > >
    >
    > > > UKIP, either for themselves or because BP are not there, surprising given their showing last year though.
    >
    > >
    >
    > >
    >
    > >
    >
    > > Remember: Sunderland was a great predictor for the Brexit referendum......
    >
    > >
    >
    > > True enough, I guess we need to see some results in the Tory shires to see if Sunderland is reflective of things yet.
    >
    >
    >
    > It looks like the Tories will be put to the sword in Cotswold (remain) while doing well in neighbouring Swindon (leave) where they've just gained one.
    >
    > Swindon was only marginally leave I would have thought, given Wiltshire as a whole was 52:48.

    I have family in Swindon, the rest of Wiltshire can be posh and wealthy, I would expect them to be remain. Which means Swindon would be heavily leave.
    22 round the table at Xmas. 22 leavers in Swindon.

    Edit: minus the kids 15 leavers.
  • Options
    Danny565Danny565 Posts: 8,091
    > @Thayer5 said:
    > So far an intriguingly bad night for Labour, an unexpectedly meh night for the Tories, a rather good night for the LDs.... and I can hear Nigel Farage chortling as I type.

    Are you SeanT?
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,048

    > @kle4 said:

    > > @kle4 said:

    >

    > > > @kle4 said:

    >

    > >

    >

    > > > I love the smell of fear in the early hours.....

    >

    > >

    >

    > > >

    >

    > >

    >

    > > >



    >

    >

    >

    > >

    >

    > >

    >

    > >

    >

    > > >

    >

    > >

    >

    > > >

    >

    > >

    >

    > > >

    >

    > >

    >

    > > > Maybe, but Sunderland results really are not always a great predictor, so excuse or not it might be right.

    >

    > >

    >

    > > >

    >

    > >

    >

    > > > UKIP, either for themselves or because BP are not there, surprising given their showing last year though.

    >

    > >

    >

    > >

    >

    > >

    >

    > > Remember: Sunderland was a great predictor for the Brexit referendum......

    >

    > >

    >

    > > True enough, I guess we need to see some results in the Tory shires to see if Sunderland is reflective of things yet.

    >

    >

    >

    > It looks like the Tories will be put to the sword in Cotswold (remain) while doing well in neighbouring Swindon (leave) where they've just gained one.

    >

    > Swindon was only marginally leave I would have thought, given Wiltshire as a whole was 52:48.



    Swindon and Wiltshire are separate councils.
    I am well aware - I had thought the county of Wiltshire was 52:48 though, when the two councils' votes were combined.
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,917
    > @RobD said:
    > Is that the good ship May I see, sailing serenely on? :p

    The night's still young...
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    Greens gained Washington South from Labour by 3 votes.

    https://twitter.com/JHarrisonLDR/status/1124084825571385350
  • Options
    Thayer5Thayer5 Posts: 97
    > @El_Capitano said:
    > And with beautiful timing, my iTunes has just cued up the right bit of Duruflé's Requiem:
    >
    > "Dies iræ, dies illa". Or in the English paraphrase, "Day of wrath and doom impending"... <

    _____

    I love Durufle's Requiem! The way it slowly emerges into beautiful noise, like something appearing from a mist. Just beautiful. Better than Faure, I think
  • Options
    viewcodeviewcode Posts: 18,977

    viewcode said:

    Thayer5 said:

    @viewcode said:



    > Any discussion of Huawei must first attempt to answer the most important, most crucial point: how do you pronounce "Huawei"? I've tried "Huw-awawwie", "Howawawaway", "Uuueeee" and "Hua-wey". <



    ____



    Haddaway and shite?

    I have tried "Howay". Unfortunately I was down south and I got blank looks... :(
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGAqvpYLiGw
    Very useful. thank you
  • Options
    AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    South Tyneside - West Park

    Greens almost took West Park


    Anne Mellanby Hetherington (Labour) 673

    Thomas Alexander Mower (Green) 630

    Margaret Mary Robson (Conservative) 358


    The Green main target is another one...I guess they will take that easily
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,048
    RobD said:

    Is that the good ship May I see, sailing serenely on? :p

    No, but it might be best if she goes to bed now, while the results look relatively ok as they may not get any better.
  • Options
    M.PartridgeM.Partridge Posts: 70
    Has anyone got a good link to track the Local Election results?

    Thanks in advance
  • Options
    Thayer5Thayer5 Posts: 97
    edited May 2019
    > @Danny565 said:
    > > @Thayer5 said:
    > > So far an intriguingly bad night for Labour, an unexpectedly meh night for the Tories, a rather good night for the LDs.... and I can hear Nigel Farage chortling as I type.
    >
    > Are you SeanT?<

    ____

    You what? NO.
  • Options
    Danny565Danny565 Posts: 8,091
    > @Thayer5 said:
    > > @Danny565 said:
    > > > @Thayer5 said:
    > > > So far an intriguingly bad night for Labour, an unexpectedly meh night for the Tories, a rather good night for the LDs.... and I can hear Nigel Farage chortling as I type.
    > >
    > > Are you SeanT?<
    >
    > ____
    >
    > You what? NO.

    Your writing style just reminds me of his. :p
  • Options
    another_richardanother_richard Posts: 25,132
    > @kle4 said>
    > I am well aware - I had thought the county of Wiltshire was 52:48 though, when the two councils' votes were combined.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_United_Kingdom_European_Union_membership_referendum#South_West_England_(including_Gibraltar)
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,048
    AndyJS said:

    Greens gained Washington South from Labour by 3 votes.



    Winning on 24.9% of the vote. FPTP, you're a star.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,048
    Danny565 said:

    > @Thayer5 said:

    > > @Danny565 said:

    > > > @Thayer5 said:

    > > > So far an intriguingly bad night for Labour, an unexpectedly meh night for the Tories, a rather good night for the LDs.... and I can hear Nigel Farage chortling as I type.

    > >

    > > Are you SeanT?<

    >

    > ____

    >

    > You what? NO.



    Your writing style just reminds me of his. :p

    Many people chortle thesedays :)
  • Options
    Thayer5Thayer5 Posts: 97
    @Danny565 said:

    > > You what? NO.
    >
    > Your writing style just reminds me of his. :p <

    _______

    I take that as a mild compliment. I lurked for a longtime. He was entertaining - but far too angry and Brexity for me.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,048

    > @kle4 said>

    > I am well aware - I had thought the county of Wiltshire was 52:48 though, when the two councils' votes were combined.



    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_United_Kingdom_European_Union_membership_referendum#South_West_England_(including_Gibraltar)

    Thanks. So I was confusing the unitary area result with the combined Wiltshire result. Swindon only slightly more leavey though.
  • Options
    GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,094
    Thayer5 said:

    > @Danny565 said:

    > > @Thayer5 said:

    > > So far an intriguingly bad night for Labour, an unexpectedly meh night for the Tories, a rather good night for the LDs.... and I can hear Nigel Farage chortling as I type.

    >

    > Are you SeanT?<



    ____



    You what? NO.

    You sound like Gavin Williamson.
  • Options
    El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 3,880
    edited May 2019
    Thayer5 said:

    I love Durufle's Requiem! The way it slowly emerges into beautiful noise, like something appearing from a mist. Just beautiful. Better than Faure, I think

    Absolutely. Of 20th century requiems, Duruflé for beauty, Howells for heart-wrenching pain.

    (And if we're on choral music while we wait for the results to roll in, Yves Castagnet's Messe Salve Regina is utterly fabulous. Modern - well, early 2000s - but timeless in the way that Duruflé was, and the Notre Dame connection is particularly relevant at present.)
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,048
    edited May 2019
    A lot of Tories probably expecting to mirror many of these Labour results - big drops but the majorities so large they still make it through.
  • Options
    dyedwooliedyedwoolie Posts: 7,786
    Lab down 12% in first Newcastle ward declared
  • Options
    Thayer5Thayer5 Posts: 97
    > @Gallowgate said:

    >
    > You what? NO.
    >
    > You sound like Gavin Williamson.<

    ______

    That is less complimentary. He's an idiot. Sabre rattling the Chinese with our aircraft carrier. Help.
  • Options
    GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,094
    https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1124086864879788040?s=21

    Labour down also in working class area of Newcastle. Previous election was only last year.
  • Options
    brokenwheelbrokenwheel Posts: 3,352
    He can’t be SeanT as he’ll have already told us tales of his latest conquests.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,787
    Ishmael_Z said:

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/05/02/gavin-williamson-allies-reveal-evidence-confronted-theresa-may/



    Claim by Williamson that the only evidence against him is the fact of his 11 minute call to the telegraph.

    "only"

    To the journalist that broke the story the following day.

    If you were PM, would you have confidence in such a minister?
  • Options
    Danny565Danny565 Posts: 8,091
    Unless these results are REALLY untypical of the whole picture, people really are crazy to think Labour should/will become even more anti-Brexit than they already are
  • Options
    Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    edited May 2019
    > @kle4 said:
    > Winning on 24.9% of the vote. FPTP, you're a star.

    Could be worse...
    https://twitter.com/ElectionMapsUK/status/1124084384326352905
  • Options
    another_richardanother_richard Posts: 25,132
    > @CarlottaVance said:
    > https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/05/02/gavin-williamson-allies-reveal-evidence-confronted-theresa-may/
    >
    >
    >
    > Claim by Williamson that the only evidence against him is the fact of his 11 minute call to the telegraph.
    >
    > "only"
    >
    > To the journalist that broke the story the following day.
    >
    > If you were PM, would you have confidence in such a minister?

    Did Williamson say what the 11 minutes conversation was about ?
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,048

    Ishmael_Z said:

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/05/02/gavin-williamson-allies-reveal-evidence-confronted-theresa-may/



    Claim by Williamson that the only evidence against him is the fact of his 11 minute call to the telegraph.

    "only"

    To the journalist that broke the story the following day.

    If you were PM, would you have confidence in such a minister?
    Quite. Enough evidence for a conviction is not the barrier.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,144
    > @Thayer5 said:
    > @Danny565 said:
    >
    > > > You what? NO.
    > >
    > > Your writing style just reminds me of his. :p <
    >
    > _______
    >
    > I take that as a mild compliment. I lurked for a longtime. He was entertaining - but far too angry and Brexity for me.

    SeanT too Brexity? Depends which hour of the day you caught him.....
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,823
    > @Gallowgate said:
    > https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1124086864879788040
    >
    >
    >
    > Labour down also in working class area of Newcastle. Previous election was only last year.

    The problem of sitting on the fence is that you lose votes to both sides.
  • Options
    GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,094
  • Options
    AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    Green gain Beacon & Bents in South Tyneside.

    Expected given how close they were in the other ward earlier
  • Options
    NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,368
    edited May 2019
    Turnout felt high in my Surrey (Waverley Binscombe) ward. The Labour promise turned out at General election levels (70-80%) but there were lots of Tories too - the polling station was bust all day without interruption. I genuinely have no idea what to expect. The returning officer claimed it was illegal to tell us the total turnout figure - something that's news to me, can anyone confirm this view?

    But as I reported earlier, I expect the LibDems to be the obvious winners overall, without a real Tory meltdown.
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,823
    > @another_richard said:
    > > @CarlottaVance said:
    > > https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/05/02/gavin-williamson-allies-reveal-evidence-confronted-theresa-may/
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > Claim by Williamson that the only evidence against him is the fact of his 11 minute call to the telegraph.
    > >
    > > "only"
    > >
    > > To the journalist that broke the story the following day.
    > >
    > > If you were PM, would you have confidence in such a minister?
    >
    > Did Williamson say what the 11 minutes conversation was about ?

    Claimed it was about the Euros. Perhaps GCHQ could tell us more.
  • Options
    El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 3,880
    The BBC elections ticker has suddenly announced council holds for Broxbourne (Con), Wigan (Lab), South Tyneside (Lab), Havant (Con). Err... why?

    Also, WTF GREENS GAIN BIRKENHEAD
  • Options
    ArtistArtist Posts: 1,883
    The Greens 4 up already.
  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,419
    Looking like a good night for Greens.
  • Options
    KentRisingKentRising Posts: 2,850
    Labour losing yet more seats in Sunders to UKIP, and in the Wirral to the Greens. Lol.

    Lovely stuff.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,990
    > @GIN1138 said:
    > > @RobD said:
    > > Is that the good ship May I see, sailing serenely on? :p
    >
    > The night's still young...

    I like to quit when I am ahead. ;)
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,823
    > @Danny565 said:
    > Unless these results are REALLY untypical of the whole picture, people really are crazy to think Labour should/will become even more anti-Brexit than they already are

    Losing lots of votes to the Greens where they are standing.
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,139
    Some spectacular results for the Greens.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,048

    Looking like a good night for Greens.

    Is it me or are they getting better at local stuff generally? They had 5x the candidates in Wiltshire in 2017 compared to 2013. Ok they did not win any, but as a sign of organisation it seemed notable at the time.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,144
    > @Tissue_Price said:
    > > @kle4 said:
    > > Winning on 24.9% of the vote. FPTP, you're a star.
    >
    > Could be worse...
    > https://twitter.com/ElectionMapsUK/status/1124084384326352905

    Localist votes for local people. Or not.
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    Only 216 spoilt papers so far in Sunderland, not a huge number.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,144
    > @El_Capitano said:
    > The BBC elections ticker has suddenly announced council holds for Broxbourne (Con), Wigan (Lab), South Tyneside (Lab), Havant (Con). Err... why?
    >
    > Also, WTF GREENS GAIN BIRKENHEAD

    Will Bootle fall?
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,446
    Labour seat losses already in double figures
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,048

    > @kle4 said:

    > Winning on 24.9% of the vote. FPTP, you're a star.



    Could be worse...

    2 thoughts

    Spennymore is a great ward name

    What on earth is up with all those Inds?
  • Options
    brokenwheelbrokenwheel Posts: 3,352
    Foxy said:

    > @Danny565 said:

    > Unless these results are REALLY untypical of the whole picture, people really are crazy to think Labour should/will become even more anti-Brexit than they already are



    Losing lots of votes to the Greens where they are standing.

    None of the Above vote, not necessarily remain, especially if there’s no Kippers.
This discussion has been closed.