Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The PB/Polling Matters podcast: Reflecting on the longest w

1567911

Comments

  • Options
    John_MJohn_M Posts: 7,503
    Rod Stewart's Maggie May now looking like inspired prophecy. Time to start rummaging through his back catalogue for any other hints for the future,
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,703
    Floater said:

    Scott_P said:

    Meanwhile

    @JohnRentoul: In normal times, Corbyn's comparison of Israeli govt to Isis would lead news for days & force his resignation.

    NOTHING will force him to resign, they need the metaphorical firing squad.
    Reminds everyone how despicable he is (waiting for NPXMPX2's version of what he really meant).

    All this talk of being a "broken man" might otherwise have engendered a modicum of sympathy in a not-very-paying-attention, but generally underdog-liking British public.
  • Options
    Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 25,840
    tyson said:

    Jobabob said:

    Can we speculate on possible campaign slogans?

    May the force be with her

    The rest wobble, Crabb sticks

    Fox yeah!

    Gove for it

    Lead the Som-shine in

    Want to bring back flogging? -Theresa May

    Come down with a great case of Crabb

    If you're less Brighton, more Hove, vote Gove

    Not another man dear - let's vote Andrea

    If we don't vote for Liam, we're foxed

    Very good Lucky

    Ta
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,817
    PlatoSaid said:

    Brom said:

    I'll vote for anyone that refuses to give Osborne and Soubry cabinet positions.

    I'm optimistic Soubry has fucked her career by being so close to Mr Cameron. Not sure anyone would touch her now.
    She's graceless, rude, vulgar and gobby. She makes Alan B'Stard look appealing.
    "Why should we, the country that produced Shakespeare, Christopher Wren - and those are just the people on our banknotes for Christ's sake - cower down to the countries that produced Hitler, Napoleon, the Mafia, and the... the... The Smurfs!" - Alan B'Stard.
  • Options
    SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095

    JohnO said:

    Scott_P said:

    @paulwaugh: MP: "The most extraordinary act of treachery. Michael will never win this elxn. When ppl realise what he's done, he'll never win anything"

    Funny, I heard earlier in the week from someone in the know that Gove is regarded by very many as a grade one sh1t whose elaborate facade of exquisite courtesy is just that. Well, today, everyone knows that.
    Well you know how I loathe disloyalty, I'm never going to be on Team Gove
    Funny, that that is what I was thinking of Gove, and the fact his wife is working him from behind.

    I might have to rejoin the Tories to stop Gove getting it if he ends up on the final two.

    Frankly Mrs May is now the standout candidate.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,079
    Tory and Labour contests a sideshow tbh.
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 21,080
    edited June 2016
    JohnO said:

    Scott_P said:

    @paulwaugh: MP: "The most extraordinary act of treachery. Michael will never win this elxn. When ppl realise what he's done, he'll never win anything"

    Funny, I heard earlier in the week from someone in the know that Gove is regarded by very many as a grade one sh1t whose elaborate facade of exquisite courtesy is just that. Well, today, everyone knows that.
    We can, I think, say for certain that Gove doesn't really want to be Prime Minister. So what's he up to?

    Clearly he doesn't have faith in Boris to fulfill Brexit, but would Theresa really be any better?

    The more I think about it, the more I have a feeling he's setting this up for Andrea Leadsom. Yes, she's inexperienced and as pointed out "nobody has ever heard of her" so who would then become "the power behind the throne"?

    Michael Gove... Get's to control the government without the bother of being Prime Minsiter.

    Hmmmmmm....
  • Options
    JohnOJohnO Posts: 4,217

    JohnO said:

    Scott_P said:

    @paulwaugh: MP: "The most extraordinary act of treachery. Michael will never win this elxn. When ppl realise what he's done, he'll never win anything"

    Funny, I heard earlier in the week from someone in the know that Gove is regarded by very many as a grade one sh1t whose elaborate facade of exquisite courtesy is just that. Well, today, everyone knows that.
    Well you know how I loathe treachery, I'm never going to be on Team Gove
    You word is your bondage.
  • Options
    eekeek Posts: 25,447
    That was mentioned on here and on HousePriceCrash back on Friday....
  • Options
    Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 25,840
    Charles said:

    PlatoSaid said:

    eek said:

    Charles said:



    Interesting. I tend to find that people look at Appendix IV.

    I prefer Appendix B or possibly E if there are more than 8 appendices.

    Hidden within Appendix C is my usual approach... Make it 30 pages long and hide the core bits on pages C12, C17-22 and C26.
    I like in the notes sections of Powerpoint presentations. Hardly anyone ever looks at those.
    That always struck me as difficult to justify as and when the decision is challenged. It needs to be somewhere that they *should* have read
    Notes are the one good thing about PPT. Otherwise I always use Prezi, and I'm getting a bit bored of that.
  • Options
    tysontyson Posts: 6,053
    On the Labour Party travails Eagle would be bonkers to make a bid. The MP's need to keep their ground until McDonnell offers a different candidate to represent the left.....ie himself which in turn must be guaranteed by the MP's.

    If McDonnell wins, he has the capacity of being a lefty Wilson; an operator and player.
  • Options
    SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    PlatoSaid said:

    Brom said:

    I'll vote for anyone that refuses to give Osborne and Soubry cabinet positions.

    I'm optimistic Soubry has fucked her career by being so close to Mr Cameron. Not sure anyone would touch her now.
    She's graceless, rude, vulgar and gobby. She makes Alan B'Stard look appealing.
    If you don't like her she must be good.
  • Options
    YellowSubmarineYellowSubmarine Posts: 2,740
  • Options
    RodCrosbyRodCrosby Posts: 7,737
    Scott_P said:

    This is why they will never be a party of competent government

    @bbclaurak: Source close to Angela Eagle, 'jeremy still has time to do the right thing ' Eagle will stand but won't announce at 3 today

    The Eagle is stranded?
  • Options
    JobabobJobabob Posts: 3,807
    RodCrosby said:

    Scott_P said:

    This is why they will never be a party of competent government

    @bbclaurak: Source close to Angela Eagle, 'jeremy still has time to do the right thing ' Eagle will stand but won't announce at 3 today

    The Eagle is stranded?
    :)
  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383

    PlatoSaid said:

    Brom said:

    I'll vote for anyone that refuses to give Osborne and Soubry cabinet positions.

    I'm optimistic Soubry has fucked her career by being so close to Mr Cameron. Not sure anyone would touch her now.
    She's graceless, rude, vulgar and gobby. She makes Alan B'Stard look appealing.
    "Why should we, the country that produced Shakespeare, Christopher Wren - and those are just the people on our banknotes for Christ's sake - cower down to the countries that produced Hitler, Napoleon, the Mafia, and the... the... The Smurfs!" - Alan B'Stard.
    :lol:
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,079
    tyson said:

    On the Labour Party travails Eagle would be bonkers to make a bid. The MP's need to keep their ground until McDonnell offers a different candidate to represent the left.....ie himself which in turn must be guaranteed by the MP's.

    If McDonnell wins, he has the capacity of being a lefty Wilson; an operator and player.

    Hillary needs to announce David Miliband will be in her team.
  • Options
    MTimTMTimT Posts: 7,034
    Jobabob said:

    I will say now that I very much hope May's diabetes isn't raised during the campaign. She was diagnosed with it relatively late in life and has learned to deal with it.

    Shades of 'I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him'? Or more "Don't mention the war!"?
  • Options
    Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 25,840

    PlatoSaid said:

    Brom said:

    I'll vote for anyone that refuses to give Osborne and Soubry cabinet positions.

    I'm optimistic Soubry has fucked her career by being so close to Mr Cameron. Not sure anyone would touch her now.
    She's graceless, rude, vulgar and gobby. She makes Alan B'Stard look appealing.
    If you don't like her she must be good.
    Or she could just be a f***ing disaster zone - right down to her Delia 'Let's be 'avin EU!' incident recently.
  • Options
    John_MJohn_M Posts: 7,503

    JohnO said:

    Scott_P said:

    @paulwaugh: MP: "The most extraordinary act of treachery. Michael will never win this elxn. When ppl realise what he's done, he'll never win anything"

    Funny, I heard earlier in the week from someone in the know that Gove is regarded by very many as a grade one sh1t whose elaborate facade of exquisite courtesy is just that. Well, today, everyone knows that.
    Well you know how I loathe disloyalty, I'm never going to be on Team Gove
    Funny, that that is what I was thinking of Gove, and the fact his wife is working him from behind.

    I might have to rejoin the Tories to stop Gove getting it if he ends up on the final two.

    Frankly Mrs May is now the standout candidate.
    Think it's too late to join. Need to have been in for three months.
  • Options
    rullkorullko Posts: 161
    Why do all journalists think "to compare" and "to liken" are synonyms?
  • Options
    Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,820
    Charles said:

    You're assuming that Cameron did a good job on the negotiation.

    As previously posted my intelligence was that he didn't put the effort in..

    My intelligence - from someone actually on the negotiating team - was the exact opposite.

    It's time to grow up abut this. The limitations of the negotiation were due to the political realities. Those haven't changed. Obviously the deal we will end up will now be different, since we're leaving the EU, but the terms certainly won't be better. How could they possibly be?
  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383

    PlatoSaid said:

    Brom said:

    I'll vote for anyone that refuses to give Osborne and Soubry cabinet positions.

    I'm optimistic Soubry has fucked her career by being so close to Mr Cameron. Not sure anyone would touch her now.
    She's graceless, rude, vulgar and gobby. She makes Alan B'Stard look appealing.
    If you don't like her she must be good.
    I haven't backed the losing side in a couple of decades.
  • Options
    tysontyson Posts: 6,053
    JohnO said:

    Oh Anna is madder than that box of frogs (sic), loopily barking and all that, but still incomparably preferable to the Priti Patels of the party.


    Agreed on Anna vs Pritti.

    On the Gove is a copper bottomed shit.....I know someone whose very good friend of one of the Whitehall Manderins (one of those Oxford things...everyone knows someone)....they (he or she) said that out of all the ministers of state they worked for, Gove was the most horrible. The nicest....Alistair Darling.
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,817
    PlatoSaid said:

    PlatoSaid said:

    Brom said:

    I'll vote for anyone that refuses to give Osborne and Soubry cabinet positions.

    I'm optimistic Soubry has fucked her career by being so close to Mr Cameron. Not sure anyone would touch her now.
    She's graceless, rude, vulgar and gobby. She makes Alan B'Stard look appealing.
    "Why should we, the country that produced Shakespeare, Christopher Wren - and those are just the people on our banknotes for Christ's sake - cower down to the countries that produced Hitler, Napoleon, the Mafia, and the... the... The Smurfs!" - Alan B'Stard.
    :lol:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFObokpBTl0
  • Options
    TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633

    Charles said:

    You're assuming that Cameron did a good job on the negotiation.

    As previously posted my intelligence was that he didn't put the effort in..

    My intelligence - from someone actually on the negotiating team - was the exact opposite.

    It's time to grow up abut this. The limitations of the negotiation were due to the political realities. Those haven't changed. Obviously the deal we will end up will now be different, since we're leaving the EU, but the terms certainly won't be better. How could they possibly be?
    Is it not worse that he did put the effort in then get virtually nothing and certainly not enough from his efforts ?
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 50,278
    Anything happened in the last 90 minutes? Still five running for the Tories and no-one for Labour?
  • Options

    Charles said:

    You're assuming that Cameron did a good job on the negotiation.

    As previously posted my intelligence was that he didn't put the effort in..

    My intelligence - from someone actually on the negotiating team - was the exact opposite.

    It's time to grow up abut this. The limitations of the negotiation were due to the political realities. Those haven't changed. Obviously the deal we will end up will now be different, since we're leaving the EU, but the terms certainly won't be better. How could they possibly be?
    Because we can now sign our own trade deals.
  • Options
    tysontyson Posts: 6,053
    Pulpstar said:

    tyson said:

    On the Labour Party travails Eagle would be bonkers to make a bid. The MP's need to keep their ground until McDonnell offers a different candidate to represent the left.....ie himself which in turn must be guaranteed by the MP's.

    If McDonnell wins, he has the capacity of being a lefty Wilson; an operator and player.

    Hillary needs to announce David Miliband will be in her team.
    I'm sorry Pulps- but what has that got to do with the price of fish?

  • Options
    JobabobJobabob Posts: 3,807
    tyson said:

    On the Labour Party travails Eagle would be bonkers to make a bid. The MP's need to keep their ground until McDonnell offers a different candidate to represent the left.....ie himself which in turn must be guaranteed by the MP's.

    If McDonnell wins, he has the capacity of being a lefty Wilson; an operator and player.

    Exactly right on the strategy. Labour would be insane to allow Corbyn back on to the ballot through the incumbency rule. People are saying they aren't ruthless enough but actually the ruthless position is just smoking him out. If Eagle (or anyone else) makes a bid then Corbyn automatically goes back on to the ballot, which will take the pressure off him.

    It's an insane system, but only because Corbyn is defying all parliamentary protocol and any sense of honour.

    Smoke him out.

    P.S. Not sure about your JM endorsement by the way!
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @paulwaugh: Pro-JC Lab source: "Where Eagles Daren't...that's the movie title. Even she's not sure if she should run. Shes's a second rung Brownite"

    The Labour Party is completely destroyed. They should shut up shop.
  • Options
    tysontyson Posts: 6,053
    RodCrosby said:

    Scott_P said:

    This is why they will never be a party of competent government

    @bbclaurak: Source close to Angela Eagle, 'jeremy still has time to do the right thing ' Eagle will stand but won't announce at 3 today

    The Eagle is stranded?

    Very good, but why am I not surprised that you managed to get a WW2 reference in?
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,079
    tyson said:

    Pulpstar said:

    tyson said:

    On the Labour Party travails Eagle would be bonkers to make a bid. The MP's need to keep their ground until McDonnell offers a different candidate to represent the left.....ie himself which in turn must be guaranteed by the MP's.

    If McDonnell wins, he has the capacity of being a lefty Wilson; an operator and player.

    Hillary needs to announce David Miliband will be in her team.
    I'm sorry Pulps- but what has that got to do with the price of fish?

    Well I'd like to reback him at some point in the next few months to get back the cash I'm laying him with :p
  • Options
    FF43FF43 Posts: 15,946

    Charles said:

    You're assuming that Cameron did a good job on the negotiation.

    As previously posted my intelligence was that he didn't put the effort in..

    My intelligence - from someone actually on the negotiating team - was the exact opposite.

    It's time to grow up abut this. The limitations of the negotiation were due to the political realities. Those haven't changed. Obviously the deal we will end up will now be different, since we're leaving the EU, but the terms certainly won't be better. How could they possibly be?
    The other side thought it was a cracking deal for the UK and they were uncomfortable about doing it. It's one reason they aren't prepared to put anything into keeping the UK on board now. Rightly or wrongly.
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,327
    Sandpit said:

    Anything happened in the last 90 minutes? Still five running for the Tories and no-one for Labour?

    Maybe Boris should defect to Labour and challenge for that leadership instead.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,724

    Jobabob said:

    John_N4 said:

    TudorRose said:

    surbiton said:

    So what happens to Nadine now ? Having Criticised Cameron and Osborne for being posh-boys, then Boris leaves her high and dry.

    So, what is this Boris scandal ?

    He never goes all the way?
    Try to source the accusation that Boris Johnson is a "Putin apologist". It surfaced during the referendum campaign. I mean who actually first called him that. What named person or specific office expressed the opinion? There's no clear answer. That's a hallmark.

    Meanwhile the French National Front is known to be financially supported by the Kremlin.

    Keir Giles of Chatham House: "Unlike in Soviet times, Russia is no longer restricted in its choice of foreign friends by considerations of ideology, and one notable result is a surge in links with right-wing and anti-EU parties".

    That isn't some loony writing on some silly website somewhere.

    The fact that Johnson has difficulty keeping his knob in his trousers - not unusual among politicians - is icing on the cake.

    So is the fact that he got himself taped discussing with Darius Guppy having someone beaten up. (The tape is here.)

    A third possible route for bringing him down...well, the Tories decided they didn't want Michael Portillo as their leader too. Portillo and Johnson are as English and as British as anyone, but from some Tories' point of view, they aren't. "I am a liberal cosmopolitan and my family is a genetic UN peacekeeping force" didn't play well.

    Despite the referendum result, Johnson's future was precarious. So glad I laid him.

    I think I will stay out of the Tory leadership market now. Michael Gove was adopted and has no blood family background in the normal sense, and to judge from what his wife says he is indecently ambitious. That may suggest that he will do exactly what he is told, so he may be exactly the sort of person the insiders want.

    Theresa May is the darling of the party itself. Is it true that she is a type 1 diabetic, by the way?

    Either of them could win.
    She is indeed a Type 1 diabetic and I believe a teetotaller. Not sure why either matter, or if they are connected, but there it is.
    Theresa MAY a teetotaller? That is serious. One lesson my father drummed into me early and hard, be very, very careful around people who do not take a drink. Over the years I have found the guvnor's advice to be generally sound.
    Lol.

    Meanwhile Gove appears to be a sleeper (just woken) for the worst of our press barons?
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 50,278
    PlatoSaid said:

    PlatoSaid said:

    Brom said:

    I'll vote for anyone that refuses to give Osborne and Soubry cabinet positions.

    I'm optimistic Soubry has fucked her career by being so close to Mr Cameron. Not sure anyone would touch her now.
    She's graceless, rude, vulgar and gobby. She makes Alan B'Stard look appealing.
    If you don't like her she must be good.
    I haven't backed the losing side in a couple of decades.
    So, May or Gove?
  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    Charles said:

    You're assuming that Cameron did a good job on the negotiation.

    As previously posted my intelligence was that he didn't put the effort in..

    My intelligence - from someone actually on the negotiating team - was the exact opposite.

    It's time to grow up abut this. The limitations of the negotiation were due to the political realities. Those haven't changed. Obviously the deal we will end up will now be different, since we're leaving the EU, but the terms certainly won't be better. How could they possibly be?
    Because we are leaving.

    Previously it was seen as an unlikely outcome.

    Now it's a question of what do they need to do to give us to keep us in the Single Market. It seems to me that a compromise on FoM is what could do it. They couldn't do that while we were still in the EU,
  • Options
    mattmatt Posts: 3,789
    eek said:

    PlatoSaid said:



    I like in the notes sections of Powerpoint presentations. Hardly anyone ever looks at those.

    Only really works if sign off within the meeting is final - I've been caught out there before. You can get away with it as the boss, harder if dealing with external parties (even different departments).

    As such I now prefer piles of utterly boring waffle (get juniors to write it) and ensure the bits are hidden in the document somewhere..
    Personally, I prefer openness and honesty. If you know what the risk is, you can manage it.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,724
    tyson said:

    RodCrosby said:

    Scott_P said:

    This is why they will never be a party of competent government

    @bbclaurak: Source close to Angela Eagle, 'jeremy still has time to do the right thing ' Eagle will stand but won't announce at 3 today

    The Eagle is stranded?

    Very good, but why am I not surprised that you managed to get a WW2 reference in?
    The Eagle is Roosting
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,079
    IanB2 said:

    Jobabob said:

    John_N4 said:

    TudorRose said:

    surbiton said:

    So what happens to Nadine now ? Having Criticised Cameron and Osborne for being posh-boys, then Boris leaves her high and dry.

    So, what is this Boris scandal ?

    He never goes all the way?
    Try to source the accusation that Boris Johnson is a "Putin apologist". It surfaced during the referendum campaign. I mean who actually first called him that. What named person or specific office expressed the opinion? There's no clear answer. That's a hallmark.

    Meanwhile the French National Front is known to be financially supported by the Kremlin.

    Keir Giles of Chatham House: "Unlike in Soviet times, Russia is no longer restricted in its choice of foreign friends by considerations of ideology, and one notable result is a surge in links with right-wing and anti-EU parties".

    That isn't some loony writing on some silly website somewhere.

    The fact that Johnson has difficulty keeping his knob in his trousers - not unusual among politicians - is icing on the cake.

    So is the fact that he got himself taped discussing with Darius Guppy having someone beaten up. (The tape is here.)

    A third possible route for bringing him down...well, the Tories decided they didn't want Michael Portillo as their leader too. Portillo and Johnson are as English and as British as anyone, but from some Tories' point of view, they aren't. "I am a liberal cosmopolitan and my family is a genetic UN peacekeeping force" didn't play well.

    Despite the referendum result, Johnson's future was precarious. So glad I laid him.

    I think I will stay out of the Tory leadership market now. Michael Gove was adopted and has no blood family background in the normal sense, and to judge from what his wife says he is indecently ambitious. That may suggest that he will do exactly what he is told, so he may be exactly the sort of person the insiders want.

    Theresa May is the darling of the party itself. Is it true that she is a type 1 diabetic, by the way?

    Either of them could win.
    She is indeed a Type 1 diabetic and I believe a teetotaller. Not sure why either matter, or if they are connected, but there it is.
    Theresa MAY a teetotaller? That is serious. One lesson my father drummed into me early and hard, be very, very careful around people who do not take a drink. Over the years I have found the guvnor's advice to be generally sound.
    Lol.

    Meanwhile Gove appears to be a sleeper (just woken) for the worst of our press barons?
    D'Acre 1 - 0 Murdoch
  • Options
    Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,820
    edited June 2016
    Jobabob said:

    No-one has ever heard of [Andrea Leadsom], beyond a few political anoraks and some obsessive Leavers.

    Yes, I think that is quite right. People shouldn't make the mistake of thinking that typical Conservative Party members follow politics as closely as we do. Most of them will barely if at all have heard of her. Similarly, they'll have only a hazy knowledge of who Stephen Crabb is.

    Of course, the campaign will change that to an extent.
  • Options
    FloaterFloater Posts: 14,195
    tyson said:

    On the Labour Party travails Eagle would be bonkers to make a bid. The MP's need to keep their ground until McDonnell offers a different candidate to represent the left.....ie himself which in turn must be guaranteed by the MP's.

    If McDonnell wins, he has the capacity of being a lefty Wilson; an operator and player.

    PLEASE choose him.

    I might not have Labour's best interests at heart though........
  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383
    CBI DG now deciding that the future is great for the North. £97bn 1.5m jobs...
  • Options
    Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 25,840
    The Guardian is just embarrassing itself now.
  • Options
    BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 8,038
    Jobabob said:

    GIN1138 said:

    PlatoSaid said:

    Barnesian said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Even though I had Boris as a -ve I don't like him pulling out as it shortens Leadsome. He's cost me probably £40 directly and indirectly this morning.

    Leadsom is neck and neck with Gove for second favourite. Crabb and Fox are outsiders.
    Bettingwise Leadsome my worst result. Politically she'd make the next GE very very interesting.
    At the mo its looking like Gove vs May in the final. I like Ms Leadsom, but I'm not confident she can make the final two.

    One wrinkle, there were reports that gov't whips (Cameron and Osborne) were backing Ms May , and Mr Gove is supposed to be their pal. Will her support move to Gove?
    Having blocked Boris, I think Gove might now withdraw in return for Secretary of State for Brexit under May. That leaves May versus Leadsom or possibly Crabb. They don't have a chance and could also withdraw. I can see this being a May coronation.
    No. I think Mr Gove is a true believer in Leave, and if he stands down it would be to support another Leave candidate. I think that means Leadsom.

    That said, Gove vs Leadsom would be my ideal final two.
    Just trying to think ahead - Fox isn't going to make it, does his vote go to May or Gove or Leadsom? If Leadsom goes out where do her votes go? Ditto Gove?

    Fox, Leadsom and Gove are committed principled Leavers.
    If she can get into the final two with Theresa I think Andrea Leadson could spring a surprise.

    There will be "hustings" TV debates, etc.... And Theresa doesn't really "do" charisma or charm.

    Andrea is sunny, positive but also sensible and she was on the LEAVE side. Just depends if she can make it into the last two.
    No-one has ever heard of her, beyond a few political anoraks and some obsessive Leavers.

    Quite
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,817
  • Options
    tysontyson Posts: 6,053
    Jobabob said:

    tyson said:

    On the Labour Party travails Eagle would be bonkers to make a bid. The MP's need to keep their ground until McDonnell offers a different candidate to represent the left.....ie himself which in turn must be guaranteed by the MP's.

    If McDonnell wins, he has the capacity of being a lefty Wilson; an operator and player.

    Exactly right on the strategy. Labour would be insane to allow Corbyn back on to the ballot through the incumbency rule. People are saying they aren't ruthless enough but actually the ruthless position is just smoking him out. If Eagle (or anyone else) makes a bid then Corbyn automatically goes back on to the ballot, which will take the pressure off him.

    It's an insane system, but only because Corbyn is defying all parliamentary protocol and any sense of honour.

    Smoke him out.

    P.S. Not sure about your JM endorsement by the way!
    It's not an endorsement, it's a reflection of reality. I am a Chukka and David Miliband boy, but god if I said that in front of the Labour party members I'd be lynched.
  • Options
    FloaterFloater Posts: 14,195
    RodCrosby said:

    Scott_P said:

    This is why they will never be a party of competent government

    @bbclaurak: Source close to Angela Eagle, 'jeremy still has time to do the right thing ' Eagle will stand but won't announce at 3 today

    The Eagle is stranded?
    Or "Labour are fecking useless"
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,313

    Jobabob said:

    No-one has ever heard of [Andrea Leadsom], beyond a few political anoraks and some obsessive Leavers.

    Yes, I think that is quite right. People shouldn't make the mistake of thinking that typical Conservative Party members follow politics as closely as we do. Most of them will barely if at all have heard of her. Similarly, they'll have only a hazy knowledge of who Stephen Crabb is.

    Of course, the campaign will change that to an extent.
    Well, until they sink back into the obscurity of also rans in a few days....
  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383
    Sandpit said:

    PlatoSaid said:

    PlatoSaid said:

    Brom said:

    I'll vote for anyone that refuses to give Osborne and Soubry cabinet positions.

    I'm optimistic Soubry has fucked her career by being so close to Mr Cameron. Not sure anyone would touch her now.
    She's graceless, rude, vulgar and gobby. She makes Alan B'Stard look appealing.
    If you don't like her she must be good.
    I haven't backed the losing side in a couple of decades.
    So, May or Gove?
    I need to see their pitches - only watched May so far. She was strong - but I'm not convinced, yet.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,079
    Anyone else reckon McDonnell could be slyly gathering signatures ?

    "If you want to continue the true Labour project..."

    The only Labourite that has enough low cunning and ruthlessness to knife Jezza maybe,...
  • Options
    TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Scott_P said:

    @paulwaugh: Pro-JC Lab source: "Where Eagles Daren't...that's the movie title. Even she's not sure if she should run. Shes's a second rung Brownite"

    The Labour Party is completely destroyed. They should shut up shop.

    They are a hostage to the £3 and some of them seem to have Stockholm Syndrome.

    Somebody needs to grow a set.
  • Options
    john_zimsjohn_zims Posts: 3,399
    @Floater

    'Or "Labour are fecking useless'

    Eagle needs to shit or get off the pot.


  • Options
    John_MJohn_M Posts: 7,503
    edited June 2016
    Scott_P said:

    @paulwaugh: Pro-JC Lab source: "Where Eagles Daren't...that's the movie title. Even she's not sure if she should run. Shes's a second rung Brownite"

    The Labour Party is completely destroyed. They should shut up shop.

    The entire Labour party should be sent off for an emergency session of bayonet practice, just to show 'em how its done.

    The Tories have been assassinating potential leaders left and right, while Labour are demonstrating once again that they can't find their own arses with both hands, a flashlight and a map.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,313
    Scott_P said:

    @paulwaugh: Pro-JC Lab source: "Where Eagles Daren't...that's the movie title. Even she's not sure if she should run. Shes's a second rung Brownite"

    The Labour Party is completely destroyed. They should shut up shop.


    Where Eagles Daren't - That was my line from yesterday, thank you very much....
  • Options
    eekeek Posts: 25,447
    Pulpstar said:

    tyson said:

    Pulpstar said:

    tyson said:

    On the Labour Party travails Eagle would be bonkers to make a bid. The MP's need to keep their ground until McDonnell offers a different candidate to represent the left.....ie himself which in turn must be guaranteed by the MP's.

    If McDonnell wins, he has the capacity of being a lefty Wilson; an operator and player.

    Hillary needs to announce David Miliband will be in her team.
    I'm sorry Pulps- but what has that got to do with the price of fish?

    Well I'd like to reback him at some point in the next few months to get back the cash I'm laying him with :p
    His odds are 7.8 at the moment :eek
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,079
    David Miliband7.4 £2.00 £12.80 David Miliband @ 13-2 ahahah
  • Options
    YellowSubmarineYellowSubmarine Posts: 2,740
    The Telegraph: The warnings of the Holocaust have never been more relevant in Britain. http://google.com/newsstand/s/CBIw96uS6CU
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,079
    eek said:

    Pulpstar said:

    tyson said:

    Pulpstar said:

    tyson said:

    On the Labour Party travails Eagle would be bonkers to make a bid. The MP's need to keep their ground until McDonnell offers a different candidate to represent the left.....ie himself which in turn must be guaranteed by the MP's.

    If McDonnell wins, he has the capacity of being a lefty Wilson; an operator and player.

    Hillary needs to announce David Miliband will be in her team.
    I'm sorry Pulps- but what has that got to do with the price of fish?

    Well I'd like to reback him at some point in the next few months to get back the cash I'm laying him with :p
    His odds are 7.8 at the moment :eek
    I know
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,313

    Charles said:

    You're assuming that Cameron did a good job on the negotiation.

    As previously posted my intelligence was that he didn't put the effort in..

    My intelligence - from someone actually on the negotiating team - was the exact opposite.

    It's time to grow up abut this. The limitations of the negotiation were due to the political realities. Those haven't changed. Obviously the deal we will end up will now be different, since we're leaving the EU, but the terms certainly won't be better. How could they possibly be?
    Yeah, like someone on the negotiating team is going to admit they monumentally fucked up...!
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,703
    TGOHF said:

    Charles said:

    You're assuming that Cameron did a good job on the negotiation.

    As previously posted my intelligence was that he didn't put the effort in..

    My intelligence - from someone actually on the negotiating team - was the exact opposite.

    It's time to grow up abut this. The limitations of the negotiation were due to the political realities. Those haven't changed. Obviously the deal we will end up will now be different, since we're leaving the EU, but the terms certainly won't be better. How could they possibly be?
    Is it not worse that he did put the effort in then get virtually nothing and certainly not enough from his efforts ?
    This is a pre-vote exchange but it was not nothing. It was a significant achievement within the bounds of what could ever be achieved.

    I don't buy the Charles line that if we had spent six months negotiating we would have got what we wanted. Too glib an explanation.

    Plus you can see the value of it in the way that Juncker couldn't clarify quickly enough how it was now invalid.

    All moot now, ofc.
  • Options
    Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,820
    Charles said:

    Because we are leaving.

    Previously it was seen as an unlikely outcome.

    Now it's a question of what do they need to do to give us to keep us in the Single Market. It seems to me that a compromise on FoM is what could do it. They couldn't do that while we were still in the EU,

    They don't want to keep us in the Single Market as much as we want to stay in the Single Market. In particular, they don't really care a toss if we are excluded from the Single Market in Services (and especially Financial Services), whereas for us it's the most important aspect of the whole thing. In fact some of them would be delighted if we weren't. It's an extremely weak position. On the other side of the coin, they have a political imperative not to make the deal too attractive.

    Still, I'm confident that Theresa May will salvage as much as anyone can from the wreckage. Her no-nonsense style and lack of theatricals is exactly right for this kind of negotiation. (Thank God it's not Boris!). She seems to have immediately realised that the threat of delaying Article 50 gives us a smidgen of leverage (although it's self-harm leverage). With a lot of luck, we'll end up with some face-saving deal of FoM and not too much damage on Services. I expect Financial Passporting is a goner, though.
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 50,278
    edited June 2016

    htt://twitter.com/DyerGeoff/status/748495072216309761

    That's absolutely brilliant!
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,563
    edited June 2016
    tlg86 said:

    Sandpit said:

    Anything happened in the last 90 minutes? Still five running for the Tories and no-one for Labour?

    Maybe Boris should defect to Labour and challenge for that leadership instead.
    Perhaps he could run for President in 2020 as the candidate for whichever party loses in November, after all he was born in the US. Giuliani ran in 2008 after having been New York Mayor and London Mayor is just as big a job. Labour or Tory, GOP or Dem, Leave or Remain Boris is flexible enough to stand for whatever best suits his ambitions. He only backed Leave after writing a Remain and Leave article and deciding which was best!
  • Options
    felixfelix Posts: 15,125
    Scott_P said:

    @paulwaugh: MP: "The most extraordinary act of treachery. Michael will never win this elxn. When ppl realise what he's done, he'll never win anything"

    Why is anyone surprised he and Mrs Gove did it it Cameron only a few months ago. If it walks and talks like a c***, etc
  • Options
    YellowSubmarineYellowSubmarine Posts: 2,740
    The Telegraph: First the people, now business is voting to go. http://google.com/newsstand/s/CBIwv6_TqCs
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,817

    Scott_P said:

    @paulwaugh: Pro-JC Lab source: "Where Eagles Daren't...that's the movie title. Even she's not sure if she should run. Shes's a second rung Brownite"

    The Labour Party is completely destroyed. They should shut up shop.


    Where Eagles Daren't - That was my line from yesterday, thank you very much....
    The Screaming Angelas and Marias!
  • Options
    SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,713
    Eagles clearly A-grade PM material there.....
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,313
    PlatoSaid said:

    Sandpit said:

    PlatoSaid said:

    PlatoSaid said:

    Brom said:

    I'll vote for anyone that refuses to give Osborne and Soubry cabinet positions.

    I'm optimistic Soubry has fucked her career by being so close to Mr Cameron. Not sure anyone would touch her now.
    She's graceless, rude, vulgar and gobby. She makes Alan B'Stard look appealing.
    If you don't like her she must be good.
    I haven't backed the losing side in a couple of decades.
    So, May or Gove?
    I need to see their pitches - only watched May so far. She was strong - but I'm not convinced, yet.
    Put me down as a May-be.....
  • Options
    JobabobJobabob Posts: 3,807
    TGOHF said:

    Scott_P said:

    @paulwaugh: Pro-JC Lab source: "Where Eagles Daren't...that's the movie title. Even she's not sure if she should run. Shes's a second rung Brownite"

    The Labour Party is completely destroyed. They should shut up shop.

    They are a hostage to the £3 and some of them seem to have Stockholm Syndrome.

    Somebody needs to grow a set.
    Once again for the hard of hearing: THERE IS NO MECHANISM UNDER THE RULES FOR REMOVING CORBYN

    The only way is to crank up the pressure until eventually he resigns. Today would have been that day (perhaps) with his disgusting Israel comments but the Tory leadership election has taken all the oxygen from the news cycle.

    Until someone can get in there and change the rules so this doesn't happen again, the PLP has no choice but to try to smoke him out.
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 50,278
    PlatoSaid said:

    Sandpit said:

    PlatoSaid said:

    PlatoSaid said:

    Brom said:

    I'll vote for anyone that refuses to give Osborne and Soubry cabinet positions.

    I'm optimistic Soubry has fucked her career by being so close to Mr Cameron. Not sure anyone would touch her now.
    She's graceless, rude, vulgar and gobby. She makes Alan B'Stard look appealing.
    If you don't like her she must be good.
    I haven't backed the losing side in a couple of decades.
    So, May or Gove?
    I need to see their pitches - only watched May so far. She was strong - but I'm not convinced, yet.
    May was very good this morning. Hopefully we will see some hustings before the MPs start voting, then some more detailed policy speeches from the final two before the ballots go out to us.
  • Options
    TheWhiteRabbitTheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,388

    Jobabob said:

    No-one has ever heard of [Andrea Leadsom], beyond a few political anoraks and some obsessive Leavers.

    Yes, I think that is quite right. People shouldn't make the mistake of thinking that typical Conservative Party members follow politics as closely as we do. Most of them will barely if at all have heard of her. Similarly, they'll have only a hazy knowledge of who Stephen Crabb is.

    Of course, the campaign will change that to an extent.
    How many people knew who Cameron was?
  • Options
    AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    Scott_P said:

    Any markets on when Boris will stand down as an MP?

    If I was Boris I'd hang around for a few months and hope the next lot in, be it May or Gove, fucking things up royally then he can step in and save the day.
  • Options
    Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    Pulpstar said:

    Anyone else reckon McDonnell could be slyly gathering signatures ?

    "If you want to continue the true Labour project..."

    The only Labourite that has enough low cunning and ruthlessness to knife Jezza maybe,...

    He's going to need a few Labour MPs to leave the party to get the required percentage.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 115,079
    Brilliant.

    Chris Ship

    I'm told Boris' widely criticised @Telegraph column - was SUB EDITED by Michael Gove who suggested changes - and Boris put them in
  • Options
    FF43FF43 Posts: 15,946
    Charles said:

    Charles said:

    You're assuming that Cameron did a good job on the negotiation.

    As previously posted my intelligence was that he didn't put the effort in..

    My intelligence - from someone actually on the negotiating team - was the exact opposite.

    It's time to grow up abut this. The limitations of the negotiation were due to the political realities. Those haven't changed. Obviously the deal we will end up will now be different, since we're leaving the EU, but the terms certainly won't be better. How could they possibly be?
    Because we are leaving.

    Previously it was seen as an unlikely outcome.

    Now it's a question of what do they need to do to give us to keep us in the Single Market. It seems to me that a compromise on FoM is what could do it. They couldn't do that while we were still in the EU,
    From the point of view of the rEU, Britain is like the key employee who demands a hefty pay rise or otherwise he will be off. So the employer makes a counter offer that this employee turns down. Everyone knows he is on the way out but he hasn't actually handed his notice in yet. The company is moving forward, making new appointments to plug the gaps etc. They don't owe him any favours and are feeling pretty sore about it all. On the other hand they don't want to antagonise him because he could cause trouble. That employee doesn't have a lot of bargaining power in this situation
  • Options
    felixfelix Posts: 15,125

    Rather depressing. Don't get me wrong, a billion times less depressing than Cameron and being in the EU. But still. Not a fan of May - no problem with her presentationally or in terms of work ethic, but very authoritarian tendencies.

    But Osborne would be far more depressing.
    That goes without saying.
    And yet everyone is saying it - you can smell the fear :)
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 59,135
    FF43 said:

    Charles said:

    Charles said:

    You're assuming that Cameron did a good job on the negotiation.

    As previously posted my intelligence was that he didn't put the effort in..

    My intelligence - from someone actually on the negotiating team - was the exact opposite.

    It's time to grow up abut this. The limitations of the negotiation were due to the political realities. Those haven't changed. Obviously the deal we will end up will now be different, since we're leaving the EU, but the terms certainly won't be better. How could they possibly be?
    Because we are leaving.

    Previously it was seen as an unlikely outcome.

    Now it's a question of what do they need to do to give us to keep us in the Single Market. It seems to me that a compromise on FoM is what could do it. They couldn't do that while we were still in the EU,
    From the point of view of the rEU, Britain is like the key employee who demands a hefty pay rise or otherwise he will be off. So the employer makes a counter offer that this employee turns down. Everyone knows he is on the way out but he hasn't actually handed his notice in yet. The company is moving forward, making new appointments to plug the gaps etc. They don't owe him any favours and are feeling pretty sore about it all. On the other hand they don't want to antagonise him because he could cause trouble. That employee doesn't have a lot of bargaining power in this situation
    That analogy ignores the fact that the EU will still trade with the UK after exit.
  • Options
    SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    edited June 2016

    The Telegraph: The warnings of the Holocaust have never been more relevant in Britain. http://google.com/newsstand/s/CBIw96uS6CU

    "Last Sunday, a Polish father and son lay bloodied on the floor after being attacked and told to “go back home” in Upton Park, East London"

    Oh dear, not a good start for Karen Pollock of the Holocaust Educational Trust, the Police have investigated this case and dismissed it as a drunken assault, even family members of the father and son have dismissed any conection with Britex as it was between two polish men and a polish gypsy.

  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 115,079

    Pulpstar said:

    Anyone else reckon McDonnell could be slyly gathering signatures ?

    "If you want to continue the true Labour project..."

    The only Labourite that has enough low cunning and ruthlessness to knife Jezza maybe,...

    He's going to need a few Labour MPs to leave the party to get the required percentage.
    Corbyn could remove the whip from a few Labour MPs and bring that required number of signatures down a bit
  • Options
    Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 25,840
    felix said:

    Rather depressing. Don't get me wrong, a billion times less depressing than Cameron and being in the EU. But still. Not a fan of May - no problem with her presentationally or in terms of work ethic, but very authoritarian tendencies.

    But Osborne would be far more depressing.
    That goes without saying.
    And yet everyone is saying it - you can smell the fear :)
    Yes - for his physical health and mental wellbeing.
  • Options
    Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,820

    Jobabob said:

    No-one has ever heard of [Andrea Leadsom], beyond a few political anoraks and some obsessive Leavers.

    Yes, I think that is quite right. People shouldn't make the mistake of thinking that typical Conservative Party members follow politics as closely as we do. Most of them will barely if at all have heard of her. Similarly, they'll have only a hazy knowledge of who Stephen Crabb is.

    Of course, the campaign will change that to an extent.
    How many people knew who Cameron was?
    Almost none. But changing leader in opposition when you're completely out of contention is very different to changing leader when in office, let alone when in office at a time of crisis. And of course Crabb and Leadsom are not in the Cameron class.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,313
    MTimT said:

    Jobabob said:

    I will say now that I very much hope May's diabetes isn't raised during the campaign. She was diagnosed with it relatively late in life and has learned to deal with it.

    Shades of 'I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him'? Or more "Don't mention the war!"?
    I am reminded of John Gielgud when on tour in rep. He was asked how he liked the town.

    "I come to Bury St Edmunds not to praise him..."
  • Options
    felixfelix Posts: 15,125

    PlatoSaid said:

    Brom said:

    I'll vote for anyone that refuses to give Osborne and Soubry cabinet positions.

    I'm optimistic Soubry has fucked her career by being so close to Mr Cameron. Not sure anyone would touch her now.
    She's graceless, rude, vulgar and gobby. She makes Alan B'Stard look appealing.
    If you don't like her she must be good.
    Lol. The Leave crowd are struggling with their alliances today - the thought that Ozzy may be in the background pulling strings is very disturbing for them - he hasn't been linked to Angela ....yet. :)
  • Options
    YellowSubmarineYellowSubmarine Posts: 2,740
    The Independent: Jewish Labour MP Ruth Smeeth leaves antisemitism event in tears after being accused of 'colluding' with media. http://google.com/newsstand/s/CBIwsvaX6CU
  • Options
    FF43FF43 Posts: 15,946
    RobD said:

    FF43 said:

    Charles said:

    Charles said:

    You're assuming that Cameron did a good job on the negotiation.

    As previously posted my intelligence was that he didn't put the effort in..

    My intelligence - from someone actually on the negotiating team - was the exact opposite.

    It's time to grow up abut this. The limitations of the negotiation were due to the political realities. Those haven't changed. Obviously the deal we will end up will now be different, since we're leaving the EU, but the terms certainly won't be better. How could they possibly be?
    Because we are leaving.

    Previously it was seen as an unlikely outcome.

    Now it's a question of what do they need to do to give us to keep us in the Single Market. It seems to me that a compromise on FoM is what could do it. They couldn't do that while we were still in the EU,
    From the point of view of the rEU, Britain is like the key employee who demands a hefty pay rise or otherwise he will be off. So the employer makes a counter offer that this employee turns down. Everyone knows he is on the way out but he hasn't actually handed his notice in yet. The company is moving forward, making new appointments to plug the gaps etc. They don't owe him any favours and are feeling pretty sore about it all. On the other hand they don't want to antagonise him because he could cause trouble. That employee doesn't have a lot of bargaining power in this situation
    That analogy ignores the fact that the EU will still trade with the UK after exit.
    Yeah, fair enough. The EU trades with South Korea too and doesn't strain itself to give that country favourable trading conditions.
  • Options
    JobabobJobabob Posts: 3,807
    Corbyn should be suspended for the disgraceful scenes today. Not only his disgusting Israel comments but for the fact he stood ideally by while Momentum's Red BNP wing decided to abuse a Jewish Labour MP.

    I await Nick Palmer's verdict on the situation.
  • Options
    Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,820

    Charles said:

    You're assuming that Cameron did a good job on the negotiation.

    As previously posted my intelligence was that he didn't put the effort in..

    My intelligence - from someone actually on the negotiating team - was the exact opposite.

    It's time to grow up abut this. The limitations of the negotiation were due to the political realities. Those haven't changed. Obviously the deal we will end up will now be different, since we're leaving the EU, but the terms certainly won't be better. How could they possibly be?
    Yeah, like someone on the negotiating team is going to admit they monumentally fucked up...!
    It was quite early on in the process. But dream on.
  • Options
    OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 32,281

    Jobabob said:

    No-one has ever heard of [Andrea Leadsom], beyond a few political anoraks and some obsessive Leavers.

    Yes, I think that is quite right. People shouldn't make the mistake of thinking that typical Conservative Party members follow politics as closely as we do. Most of them will barely if at all have heard of her. Similarly, they'll have only a hazy knowledge of who Stephen Crabb is.

    Of course, the campaign will change that to an extent.
    She features in Prtivate Eye sometimes. Not alway in the best light.
  • Options
    felixfelix Posts: 15,125
    PlatoSaid said:

    PlatoSaid said:

    Brom said:

    I'll vote for anyone that refuses to give Osborne and Soubry cabinet positions.

    I'm optimistic Soubry has fucked her career by being so close to Mr Cameron. Not sure anyone would touch her now.
    She's graceless, rude, vulgar and gobby. She makes Alan B'Stard look appealing.
    If you don't like her she must be good.
    I haven't backed the losing side in a couple of decades.
    It helps when you switch sides every few minutes.
  • Options
    JobabobJobabob Posts: 3,807

    Pulpstar said:

    Anyone else reckon McDonnell could be slyly gathering signatures ?

    "If you want to continue the true Labour project..."

    The only Labourite that has enough low cunning and ruthlessness to knife Jezza maybe,...

    He's going to need a few Labour MPs to leave the party to get the required percentage.
    Corbyn could remove the whip from a few Labour MPs and bring that required number of signatures down a bit
    In which case he would split the party as the PLP rebellion would split and appoint a leader in the Commons, and it would be JM that did it. Way to go!
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,079
    When is the first Tory vote ?
  • Options
    Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039

    Pulpstar said:

    Anyone else reckon McDonnell could be slyly gathering signatures ?

    "If you want to continue the true Labour project..."

    The only Labourite that has enough low cunning and ruthlessness to knife Jezza maybe,...

    He's going to need a few Labour MPs to leave the party to get the required percentage.
    Corbyn could remove the whip from a few Labour MPs and bring that required number of signatures down a bit
    How about:

    Challenge from AN Other (Smith?) gets the 50 sigs.
    Then Corbyn agrees to go if McDonnell also gets 50 sigs.

    Would the PLP go for that? Or would they hold out (!) for someone like Clive Lewis?
  • Options
    Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    Pulpstar said:

    When is the first Tory vote ?

    Tuesday
  • Options
    ParistondaParistonda Posts: 1,819
    If Boris had backed remain, Cameron could have kept a more neutral air to the campaign, and not destroyed his own credibility, only intervening occasionally and being taken more seriously when he did so. There would have been less project fear and so when used towards the end it would count. Boris could have taken a leading positive role in the campaign, and against a leave side sorely lacking in popular big hitters, remain would have most likely won. Boris takes the credit, along with Osborne, and when Cameron steps down in 2018-19, a vote to the members between the 2 results in an obvious Boris victory - the man who won the Tories London twice and won the eu referendum is a sure fire electoral asset.

    Boris' decision to back Leave has got to count as the second biggest misjudgement since Suez (Cameron's decision to hold the referendum in the first place would take first place!)
This discussion has been closed.