Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

The July 20th by-elections – latest betting – politicalbetting.com

14567810»

Comments

  • boulayboulay Posts: 5,558

    boulay said:

    Farooq said:

    glw said:

    Leon said:

    Sean_F said:

    How we’ve sunk as a nation. 60 years ago, there’s be a group of men in Whitehall, laughing in British, as they orchestrated the coup.

    With our deep involvement in the Ukrainian war, I'd be surprised if there isn't UK intel and special ops involvement on this front, as well

    The Kremlin's paranoia about "British spies" might well be justified
    When Putin is hooded and stood on the gallows, just before they open the trapdoor I hope someone leans over and whipsers in his ear "Greetings from Salisbury."
    and Mayfair
    and Kyiv
    and Georgia
    and Luhansk
    [clunk gasp crack]
    and Donetsk
    and Washington
    and Crimea
    and
    Sounds like a bad version of Rotterdam by the Beautiful South.
    You mean there's a good version?!
    Very good point. Loved Welcome to the Beautiful South but everything after seemed like twee Radio 2 shit.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 51,152
    An alternative theory on this -

    Grant Mitchell (TM) has been seeing the war as lost for a while. Been building up supplies and accreting allies. He’s gone for it now - maybe because it became obvious what he was doing, but before the Ukrainian advance gets through the minefields that are slowing them down at the moment. Once they hit open country it’s going to be Musical Box time, probably.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 55,035
    Farooq said:

    boulay said:

    Leon said:

    Wowww

    🇷🇺⚡️HEAVY TRAFFIC OF RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT HIGH-PROFILE OFFICIALS TO ST. PETERSBURG AWAY FROM MOSCOW


    https://twitter.com/battlesintel/status/1672606916927713280?s=46&t=bulOICNH15U6kB0MwE6Lfw

    The reason they are shifting to St P is because it’s very easy for them to escape to the non NATO country Finland, what’s that you say, Finland joined NATO because we invaded Ukraine? Bugger.
    Easier to attack the Poles from St Petersburg.

    Not Poland, you understand. I mean the frozen north. Perhaps Russia can win a war against some arctic mackerel or something.
    Aren’t they still at Glastonbury?
  • geoffwgeoffw Posts: 8,774
    edited June 2023
    Farooq said:

    geoffw said:

    ydoethur said:

    Leon said:


    Visegrád 24
    @visegrad24
    ·
    2m
    BREAKING:

    The Wagner Group has announced that most of the Russian Army units in the Lipetsk region have switched sides and joined the Wagner Group military column heading toward Moscow

    1. It is Visegrad, and they can be quite excitable if not outright mendacious

    2. Wagner Group would say this, wouldn't they?

    3. Bloody hell Ken, what if it's true??

    It does make some sense. If you're a young Russian male about to be thrown into the meat-paste-machine that is Ukraine, why not throw in your lot with Wagner, and hopefully avoid a real war altogether. It's a massive risk, but then so is fighting enraged Ukrainians with NATO weapons
    Again, the Petrograd garrison, 1917.

    Why did they mutiny?

    Because they had been told they were about to be sent to the Front.
    It wasn't called Petrograd till 1924

    1914
    On 26 January 1924, five days after Lenin's death, Petrograd was renamed Leningrad.

    (per Wiki) ... so yeah!
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,679

    kinabalu said:

    kinabalu said:

    kinabalu said:

    kinabalu said:

    I think the wishes for chaos in Russia are unwise.

    A country as vast and well-armed as that does not spiral into chaos without it affecting large areas of the rest of the world, for diverse, military, migratory , and economic reasons. It wouldn't be something we could just cheerfully watch from our armchairs.

    Hopefully there will be a full blown civil war and the country will be less vast and less well armed by the end of it.
    C'mon. This is heartless, blase and juvenile.
    I have plenty of heart for the victims of Moscow's aggression.

    Which includes plenty of every day Russians who are repressed and sent to the meat grinder in order to support Moscow's regime.

    The collapse of Russia as a unitary state would be great news for the world, and great news for ordinary Russians.

    Why are you so heartless as to oppose that?
    But a 'full blown civil war in Russia' - your words - really isn't something to hope for. It'd be terrible in and of itself plus nobody can model where it leads with any confidence at all.
    A full-blown civil war would be the second-best option possible, behind a rapid victory for one side or the other who immediately decides to withdraw Russian forces from Ukraine as a result.

    Given that Putin launched this war, and Prigozhin willingly smashed Bakhmut to pieces over several months, I don't have much hope for the ideal scenario. A full-blown civil war is a more likely path to Russian troops leaving Ukraine, as they are pulled back to fight on one side or the other. And then Ukraine will know peace, and can start the long process of reconstruction and dealing with the grief of its losses.

    So, yeah, I'm pretty down with hoping for a Russian civil war actually. If Putin does do a runner and Prigozhin takes over without a fight, and simply continues the war in Ukraine for more months of violence and destruction, I don't see that as a preferable outcome.
    The potential carnage from that scenario is massive and we have no clue where it would lead. If a bloody disintegration of Russia were to happen, with various 'big man' psychopaths trading atrocities, I'd be hoping the resulting horrors are limited to Russia, that whatever sort of Russia emerges from it is better than this one, and of course that it leads to the liberation of Ukraine, but there's no way on earth I'm hoping it happens in the first place.
    Imagine you have the choice between two different futures in four weeks time.

    In scenario 1, Prigozhin's rebellion is rapidly defeated, or rapidly victorious, and the Russian army remains fighting in Ukraine. Ukrainian cities continue to face bombardment from Russian missiles and artillery shells. The war continues. The Ukrainian counterattack makes progress, but inevitably there are many casualties, both Ukrainian and Russian.

    In scenario 2, Prigozhin's rebellion makes some progress, but Putin fights on. There is fighting in and around Moscow and millions of civilians flee. Russian army units are redeployed from Ukraine and declare for either side, leading to heavy fighting across south-western Russia. Ukraine liberates its territory, and the war with Russia comes to an end. The bombardment of Ukrainian cities is brought to an end, and Ukrainian civilians are freed from Russian occupation. Ukraine can begin the massive task of reconstruction, mine-clearing and grieving. Many Ukrainian soldiers are able to return to their families. Boris Johnson visits Ukraine and takes selfies with Zelenskyy in Mariupol.

    Surely scenario 2 is preferable to scenario 1?
    Hmm, very probably. But you've left it hanging a bit. Where's that Russian civil war going? If you promise me it doesn't trigger more horrors than those we're saving in Ukraine you might have a deal. Can you?
    You can't promise that a continuation of the Russian war in Ukraine won't result in further horrors, like the destruction of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant. So, yes, there are terrible uncertainties in both future scenarios.

    So concentrate on what we know. A civil war in Russia will end the war in Ukraine. That's a good trade in my view.
    I can't promise that. That's the point. It's not a trade, as in a chess match or something, it's a development with unknowable and potentially cataclysmic consequences. To go back to where we started - the notion of actively hoping for a 'full blown civil war in Russia'. To me 'full blown civil war' sounds utterly horrendous, both for the carnage and chaos it would cause in Russia and the potential for overspill. It's just not a 'hoping for' type of event.

    I don't believe you're truly hoping for it either. What you want to see is just enough internal shit in Russia to get them to quit Ukraine and not a penny more. I'd like to see that too but it depends on how much 'shit' it takes. I'm certainly not about to 'hope' for the ruination and collapse of Russia, or the deaths of millions of Russian people. Putin is 100% to blame, he started this war, but I don't feel the suffering of Russians counts as nothing compared to Ukrainians.
  • WhisperingOracleWhisperingOracle Posts: 9,260
    edited June 2023
    Nigelb said:

    Some people -- civilians? -- are just digging up roads between Lipetsk and Moscow to stifle Wagner movements northward.
    https://twitter.com/AricToler/status/1672607862994923520

    Either that, or Northern Gas Networks cocking up again.

    This is a flaw in a roads-only plan, but there doesn't seem to much be support for Putin.

    Where are all the troops ? There must be at least some not in Ukraine.
  • solarflaresolarflare Posts: 3,750
    Nigelb said:

    Some people -- civilians? -- are just digging up roads between Lipetsk and Moscow to stifle Wagner movements northward.
    https://twitter.com/AricToler/status/1672607862994923520

    Either that, or Northern Gas Networks cocking up again.

    There's always a set of bloody roadworks on when you're trying to do your coup trip.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,416
    Farooq said:

    Farooq said:

    glw said:

    Leon said:

    Sean_F said:

    How we’ve sunk as a nation. 60 years ago, there’s be a group of men in Whitehall, laughing in British, as they orchestrated the coup.

    With our deep involvement in the Ukrainian war, I'd be surprised if there isn't UK intel and special ops involvement on this front, as well

    The Kremlin's paranoia about "British spies" might well be justified
    When Putin is hooded and stood on the gallows, just before they open the trapdoor I hope someone leans over and whipsers in his ear "Greetings from Salisbury."
    and Mayfair
    and Kyiv
    and Georgia
    and Luhansk
    [clunk gasp crack]
    and Donetsk
    and Washington
    and Crimea
    and
    Transnistria!
    Cisnistria
    No it's the other side of the [D]niester river. Cisnistria would be the Western bank, which would be Moldova in this case. The breakaway republic of Transnistria is the Eastern bank, hence the name.

    Next week. We have Wessex, Sussex, Essex, Middlesex but no Norrex. Why not?
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,477
    TASS reporting Wagner soldiers have been offered amnesty if they lay down weapons.
    Not the actions of a confident regime.
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 17,468
    Nigelb said:

    Some people -- civilians? -- are just digging up roads between Lipetsk and Moscow to stifle Wagner movements northward.
    https://twitter.com/AricToler/status/1672607862994923520

    Either that, or Northern Gas Networks cocking up again.

    Or election candidates creating potholes they can glumly point at.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,477
    viewcode said:

    Farooq said:

    Farooq said:

    glw said:

    Leon said:

    Sean_F said:

    How we’ve sunk as a nation. 60 years ago, there’s be a group of men in Whitehall, laughing in British, as they orchestrated the coup.

    With our deep involvement in the Ukrainian war, I'd be surprised if there isn't UK intel and special ops involvement on this front, as well

    The Kremlin's paranoia about "British spies" might well be justified
    When Putin is hooded and stood on the gallows, just before they open the trapdoor I hope someone leans over and whipsers in his ear "Greetings from Salisbury."
    and Mayfair
    and Kyiv
    and Georgia
    and Luhansk
    [clunk gasp crack]
    and Donetsk
    and Washington
    and Crimea
    and
    Transnistria!
    Cisnistria
    No it's the other side of the [D]niester river. Cisnistria would be the Western bank, which would be Moldova in this case. The breakaway republic of Transnistria is the Eastern bank, hence the name.

    Next week. We have Wessex, Sussex, Essex, Middlesex but no Norrex. Why not?
    Hertfordshire in the way?
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,395
    dixiedean said:

    viewcode said:

    Farooq said:

    Farooq said:

    glw said:

    Leon said:

    Sean_F said:

    How we’ve sunk as a nation. 60 years ago, there’s be a group of men in Whitehall, laughing in British, as they orchestrated the coup.

    With our deep involvement in the Ukrainian war, I'd be surprised if there isn't UK intel and special ops involvement on this front, as well

    The Kremlin's paranoia about "British spies" might well be justified
    When Putin is hooded and stood on the gallows, just before they open the trapdoor I hope someone leans over and whipsers in his ear "Greetings from Salisbury."
    and Mayfair
    and Kyiv
    and Georgia
    and Luhansk
    [clunk gasp crack]
    and Donetsk
    and Washington
    and Crimea
    and
    Transnistria!
    Cisnistria
    No it's the other side of the [D]niester river. Cisnistria would be the Western bank, which would be Moldova in this case. The breakaway republic of Transnistria is the Eastern bank, hence the name.

    Next week. We have Wessex, Sussex, Essex, Middlesex but no Norrex. Why not?
    Hertfordshire in the way?
    Mercia. IIRC Mercia extended to London, and the Thames was the border. And Londoners then as now thought they were the centre of the cosmos.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,690
    Robot Sunak has got himself stuck in a 'do loop'.

    Every answer he is giving is exactly the same no matter what the question. Even the phrasing is the same.

    Clearly Leon is right and aliens have swapped him out for one of their androids.

    Mind you, if that is the best they can come up with then they are pretty crap technologically :)
  • boulayboulay Posts: 5,558
    I’m quite amused that it takes a potential coup in a nuclear power in which thousands could die to stop bickering on PB. More coups, fewer trans arguments please. Thank you.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 55,035
    edited June 2023
    DavidL said:

    New crisis in Ukraine:

    ""We are little-by-little running out of popcorn,” jokes Yuriy Sak, an adviser to Ukraine's defence minister.

    Great quote. I’m pretty sure that Ukraine is happier today, than at any point in the last 16 months. I know I am.
  • WhisperingOracleWhisperingOracle Posts: 9,260
    edited June 2023
    According to various people scanning satellite data, part of the Wagner forces are already in Tula, which is only about 180km from Moscow, or about 110 miles.

    Putin really is in trouble.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,416
    dixiedean said:

    viewcode said:

    Farooq said:

    Farooq said:

    glw said:

    Leon said:

    Sean_F said:

    How we’ve sunk as a nation. 60 years ago, there’s be a group of men in Whitehall, laughing in British, as they orchestrated the coup.

    With our deep involvement in the Ukrainian war, I'd be surprised if there isn't UK intel and special ops involvement on this front, as well

    The Kremlin's paranoia about "British spies" might well be justified
    When Putin is hooded and stood on the gallows, just before they open the trapdoor I hope someone leans over and whipsers in his ear "Greetings from Salisbury."
    and Mayfair
    and Kyiv
    and Georgia
    and Luhansk
    [clunk gasp crack]
    and Donetsk
    and Washington
    and Crimea
    and
    Transnistria!
    Cisnistria
    No it's the other side of the [D]niester river. Cisnistria would be the Western bank, which would be Moldova in this case. The breakaway republic of Transnistria is the Eastern bank, hence the name.

    Next week. We have Wessex, Sussex, Essex, Middlesex but no Norrex. Why not?
    Hertfordshire in the way?
    The horrible thing is, I seem to remember that there is an actual reason but I've forgotten what it is!
  • kinabalu said:

    kinabalu said:

    kinabalu said:

    kinabalu said:

    kinabalu said:

    I think the wishes for chaos in Russia are unwise.

    A country as vast and well-armed as that does not spiral into chaos without it affecting large areas of the rest of the world, for diverse, military, migratory , and economic reasons. It wouldn't be something we could just cheerfully watch from our armchairs.

    Hopefully there will be a full blown civil war and the country will be less vast and less well armed by the end of it.
    C'mon. This is heartless, blase and juvenile.
    I have plenty of heart for the victims of Moscow's aggression.

    Which includes plenty of every day Russians who are repressed and sent to the meat grinder in order to support Moscow's regime.

    The collapse of Russia as a unitary state would be great news for the world, and great news for ordinary Russians.

    Why are you so heartless as to oppose that?
    But a 'full blown civil war in Russia' - your words - really isn't something to hope for. It'd be terrible in and of itself plus nobody can model where it leads with any confidence at all.
    A full-blown civil war would be the second-best option possible, behind a rapid victory for one side or the other who immediately decides to withdraw Russian forces from Ukraine as a result.

    Given that Putin launched this war, and Prigozhin willingly smashed Bakhmut to pieces over several months, I don't have much hope for the ideal scenario. A full-blown civil war is a more likely path to Russian troops leaving Ukraine, as they are pulled back to fight on one side or the other. And then Ukraine will know peace, and can start the long process of reconstruction and dealing with the grief of its losses.

    So, yeah, I'm pretty down with hoping for a Russian civil war actually. If Putin does do a runner and Prigozhin takes over without a fight, and simply continues the war in Ukraine for more months of violence and destruction, I don't see that as a preferable outcome.
    The potential carnage from that scenario is massive and we have no clue where it would lead. If a bloody disintegration of Russia were to happen, with various 'big man' psychopaths trading atrocities, I'd be hoping the resulting horrors are limited to Russia, that whatever sort of Russia emerges from it is better than this one, and of course that it leads to the liberation of Ukraine, but there's no way on earth I'm hoping it happens in the first place.
    Imagine you have the choice between two different futures in four weeks time.

    In scenario 1, Prigozhin's rebellion is rapidly defeated, or rapidly victorious, and the Russian army remains fighting in Ukraine. Ukrainian cities continue to face bombardment from Russian missiles and artillery shells. The war continues. The Ukrainian counterattack makes progress, but inevitably there are many casualties, both Ukrainian and Russian.

    In scenario 2, Prigozhin's rebellion makes some progress, but Putin fights on. There is fighting in and around Moscow and millions of civilians flee. Russian army units are redeployed from Ukraine and declare for either side, leading to heavy fighting across south-western Russia. Ukraine liberates its territory, and the war with Russia comes to an end. The bombardment of Ukrainian cities is brought to an end, and Ukrainian civilians are freed from Russian occupation. Ukraine can begin the massive task of reconstruction, mine-clearing and grieving. Many Ukrainian soldiers are able to return to their families. Boris Johnson visits Ukraine and takes selfies with Zelenskyy in Mariupol.

    Surely scenario 2 is preferable to scenario 1?
    Hmm, very probably. But you've left it hanging a bit. Where's that Russian civil war going? If you promise me it doesn't trigger more horrors than those we're saving in Ukraine you might have a deal. Can you?
    You can't promise that a continuation of the Russian war in Ukraine won't result in further horrors, like the destruction of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant. So, yes, there are terrible uncertainties in both future scenarios.

    So concentrate on what we know. A civil war in Russia will end the war in Ukraine. That's a good trade in my view.
    I can't promise that. That's the point. It's not a trade, as in a chess match or something, it's a development with unknowable and potentially cataclysmic consequences. To go back to where we started - the notion of actively hoping for a 'full blown civil war in Russia'. To me 'full blown civil war' sounds utterly horrendous, both for the carnage and chaos it would cause in Russia and the potential for overspill. It's just not a 'hoping for' type of event.

    I don't believe you're truly hoping for it either. What you want to see is just enough internal shit in Russia to get them to quit Ukraine and not a penny more. I'd like to see that too but it depends on how much 'shit' it takes. I'm certainly not about to 'hope' for the ruination and collapse of Russia, or the deaths of millions of Russian people. Putin is 100% to blame, he started this war, but I don't feel the suffering of Russians counts as nothing compared to Ukrainians.
    Your apologia for Russian fascism is truly disturbing and betrays a lack of sense and humanity.

    Ukrainians are the victims in this, not Russia. Seeing a continuation of war crimes in Ukraine is not something to desire, to avoid a collapse of Russia.

    Even Russia quitting Ukraine and "not a penny more" leaves Putin's fascist regime in charge of Russia and repressing Russia's people.

    A relatively peaceful overthrow of Putin is more desirable than a protracted civil war, sure, but either of a simply overthrow or a civil war are infinitely preferable to seeing Russia continue invading other nations.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 52,149
    viewcode said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Guys:

    Imetatronik thinks the coup is going nowhere.

    Yes, but what does Optimus Prime say?
    "There's a fine line between being a hero, and being a memory!" [that's from "Arrival From Cybertron", no less!]
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,032
    Sandpit said:

    DavidL said:

    New crisis in Ukraine:

    ""We are little-by-little running out of popcorn,” jokes Yuriy Sak, an adviser to Ukraine's defence minister.

    Great quote. I’m pretty sure that Ukraine is happier today, than at any point in the last 16 months. I know I am.
    I don't know if I would describe myself as "happy" about a civil war in a country with the second largest nuclear arsenal on the planet. The current situation is not without risks but it may save many tens of thousands of brave Ukrainian lives.
  • CiceroCicero Posts: 3,126

    Cicero said:

    dixiedean said:

    Sandpit said:

    Wagner sources are suggesting this all started when Russian troops fired on Wagner troops in Ukraine a couple of days ago. Could be the usual bollocks to justify actions, or there might be something to it.

    This has been months in the planning.
    Yes, the coup de Blyat looks very well planned, not thrown together at the last minute. To be fair Ukrainian sources were forecasting such a move three months ago.
    Perhaps taking Bakhmut to give him credibility was coordinated with Ukraine, when all along he was plotting to move against Putin and end the war.
    Duplicity and criminality... My my, you DO have a dirty mind.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,416
    rcs1000 said:

    viewcode said:

    Farooq said:

    Farooq said:

    glw said:

    Leon said:

    Sean_F said:

    How we’ve sunk as a nation. 60 years ago, there’s be a group of men in Whitehall, laughing in British, as they orchestrated the coup.

    With our deep involvement in the Ukrainian war, I'd be surprised if there isn't UK intel and special ops involvement on this front, as well

    The Kremlin's paranoia about "British spies" might well be justified
    When Putin is hooded and stood on the gallows, just before they open the trapdoor I hope someone leans over and whipsers in his ear "Greetings from Salisbury."
    and Mayfair
    and Kyiv
    and Georgia
    and Luhansk
    [clunk gasp crack]
    and Donetsk
    and Washington
    and Crimea
    and
    Transnistria!
    Cisnistria
    No it's the other side of the [D]niester river. Cisnistria would be the Western bank, which would be Moldova in this case. The breakaway republic of Transnistria is the Eastern bank, hence the name.

    Next week. We have Wessex, Sussex, Essex, Middlesex but no Norrex. Why not?
    You know Middlesex sounds almost exactly like Non Binary, so I salute your ability to bring this whole discussion back to trans.
    Six degrees of Kevina Bacon. :)
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,032
    boulay said:

    I’m quite amused that it takes a potential coup in a nuclear power in which thousands could die to stop bickering on PB. More coups, fewer trans arguments please. Thank you.

    When the aliens reveal themselves @Leon may the only poster left on here.
  • El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 4,240
    edited June 2023
    On topic (for which I apologise), I see the LibDems in Somerton & Frome have been pumping out a local fake newspaper, the Somerset Clarion. Some irony in that the Clarion tradition was firmly socialist...

    https://twitter.com/Lib_Dem_Watch/status/1672588593594871808
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,772

    ..

    kinabalu said:

    kinabalu said:

    kinabalu said:

    kinabalu said:

    I think the wishes for chaos in Russia are unwise.

    A country as vast and well-armed as that does not spiral into chaos without it affecting large areas of the rest of the world, for diverse, military, migratory , and economic reasons. It wouldn't be something we could just cheerfully watch from our armchairs.

    Hopefully there will be a full blown civil war and the country will be less vast and less well armed by the end of it.
    C'mon. This is heartless, blase and juvenile.
    I have plenty of heart for the victims of Moscow's aggression.

    Which includes plenty of every day Russians who are repressed and sent to the meat grinder in order to support Moscow's regime.

    The collapse of Russia as a unitary state would be great news for the world, and great news for ordinary Russians.

    Why are you so heartless as to oppose that?
    But a 'full blown civil war in Russia' - your words - really isn't something to hope for. It'd be terrible in and of itself plus nobody can model where it leads with any confidence at all.
    A full-blown civil war would be the second-best option possible, behind a rapid victory for one side or the other who immediately decides to withdraw Russian forces from Ukraine as a result.

    Given that Putin launched this war, and Prigozhin willingly smashed Bakhmut to pieces over several months, I don't have much hope for the ideal scenario. A full-blown civil war is a more likely path to Russian troops leaving Ukraine, as they are pulled back to fight on one side or the other. And then Ukraine will know peace, and can start the long process of reconstruction and dealing with the grief of its losses.

    So, yeah, I'm pretty down with hoping for a Russian civil war actually. If Putin does do a runner and Prigozhin takes over without a fight, and simply continues the war in Ukraine for more months of violence and destruction, I don't see that as a preferable outcome.
    The potential carnage from that scenario is massive and we have no clue where it would lead. If a bloody disintegration of Russia were to happen, with various 'big man' psychopaths trading atrocities, I'd be hoping the resulting horrors are limited to Russia, that whatever sort of Russia emerges from it is better than this one, and of course that it leads to the liberation of Ukraine, but there's no way on earth I'm hoping it happens in the first place.
    Imagine you have the choice between two different futures in four weeks time.

    In scenario 1, Prigozhin's rebellion is rapidly defeated, or rapidly victorious, and the Russian army remains fighting in Ukraine. Ukrainian cities continue to face bombardment from Russian missiles and artillery shells. The war continues. The Ukrainian counterattack makes progress, but inevitably there are many casualties, both Ukrainian and Russian.

    In scenario 2, Prigozhin's rebellion makes some progress, but Putin fights on. There is fighting in and around Moscow and millions of civilians flee. Russian army units are redeployed from Ukraine and declare for either side, leading to heavy fighting across south-western Russia. Ukraine liberates its territory, and the war with Russia comes to an end. The bombardment of Ukrainian cities is brought to an end, and Ukrainian civilians are freed from Russian occupation. Ukraine can begin the massive task of reconstruction, mine-clearing and grieving. Many Ukrainian soldiers are able to return to their families. Boris Johnson visits Ukraine and takes selfies with Zelenskyy in Mariupol.

    Surely scenario 2 is preferable to scenario 1?
    Hmm, very probably. But you've left it hanging a bit. Where's that Russian civil war going? If you promise me it doesn't trigger more horrors than those we're saving in Ukraine you might have a deal. Can you?
    Just so.
    The last Russian civil war lasted 6 years, caused c.1.5m deaths and the US and UK backed the losing side.
    Since when is 1917 to 1921 six years???
    The Civil War began in 1918.
  • geoffwgeoffw Posts: 8,774
    DavidL said:

    New crisis in Ukraine:

    ""We are little-by-little running out of popcorn,” jokes Yuriy Sak, an adviser to Ukraine's defence minister.

    Don't you make it by shooting it from guns? Are they running out of firearms?

  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 55,035
    edited June 2023
    DavidL said:

    Sandpit said:

    DavidL said:

    New crisis in Ukraine:

    ""We are little-by-little running out of popcorn,” jokes Yuriy Sak, an adviser to Ukraine's defence minister.

    Great quote. I’m pretty sure that Ukraine is happier today, than at any point in the last 16 months. I know I am.
    I don't know if I would describe myself as "happy" about a civil war in a country with the second largest nuclear arsenal on the planet. The current situation is not without risks but it may save many tens of thousands of brave Ukrainian lives.
    The Ukranians aren’t quite having the party yet. But the bunting is being found, and the Champagne ordered…

    There’s a genuine feeling that the war in Ukraine could be over in days or even hours.
  • boulayboulay Posts: 5,558
    DavidL said:

    boulay said:

    I’m quite amused that it takes a potential coup in a nuclear power in which thousands could die to stop bickering on PB. More coups, fewer trans arguments please. Thank you.

    When the aliens reveal themselves @Leon may the only poster left on here.
    I thought someone had already mentioned Little Green Men being observed there?
  • Northern_AlNorthern_Al Posts: 8,478
    rcs1000 said:

    viewcode said:

    Farooq said:

    Farooq said:

    glw said:

    Leon said:

    Sean_F said:

    How we’ve sunk as a nation. 60 years ago, there’s be a group of men in Whitehall, laughing in British, as they orchestrated the coup.

    With our deep involvement in the Ukrainian war, I'd be surprised if there isn't UK intel and special ops involvement on this front, as well

    The Kremlin's paranoia about "British spies" might well be justified
    When Putin is hooded and stood on the gallows, just before they open the trapdoor I hope someone leans over and whipsers in his ear "Greetings from Salisbury."
    and Mayfair
    and Kyiv
    and Georgia
    and Luhansk
    [clunk gasp crack]
    and Donetsk
    and Washington
    and Crimea
    and
    Transnistria!
    Cisnistria
    No it's the other side of the [D]niester river. Cisnistria would be the Western bank, which would be Moldova in this case. The breakaway republic of Transnistria is the Eastern bank, hence the name.

    Next week. We have Wessex, Sussex, Essex, Middlesex but no Norrex. Why not?
    You know Middlesex sounds almost exactly like Non Binary, so I salute your ability to bring this whole discussion back to trans.
    With just a soupçon of country cricket as well, to suit all tastes.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,416

    viewcode said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Guys:

    Imetatronik thinks the coup is going nowhere.

    Yes, but what does Optimus Prime say?
    "There's a fine line between being a hero, and being a memory!" [that's from "Arrival From Cybertron", no less!]
    “Today, in the name of freedom, we take the battle to them.”
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,477
    edited June 2023

    According to various people scanning satellite data, part of the Wagner forces are already in Tula, which is only about 180km from Moscow, or about 110 miles.

    Putin really is in trouble.

    Are they in Tula or Tula Oblast?
    The latter wouldn't be a surprise as they were reported in Yelets about an hour ago.
    PS. Am surprised at the relatively short distances involved.
    I suppose we always think of Russia West to East.
  • CookieCookie Posts: 14,081
    viewcode said:

    Farooq said:

    Farooq said:

    glw said:

    Leon said:

    Sean_F said:

    How we’ve sunk as a nation. 60 years ago, there’s be a group of men in Whitehall, laughing in British, as they orchestrated the coup.

    With our deep involvement in the Ukrainian war, I'd be surprised if there isn't UK intel and special ops involvement on this front, as well

    The Kremlin's paranoia about "British spies" might well be justified
    When Putin is hooded and stood on the gallows, just before they open the trapdoor I hope someone leans over and whipsers in his ear "Greetings from Salisbury."
    and Mayfair
    and Kyiv
    and Georgia
    and Luhansk
    [clunk gasp crack]
    and Donetsk
    and Washington
    and Crimea
    and
    Transnistria!
    Cisnistria
    No it's the other side of the [D]niester river. Cisnistria would be the Western bank, which would be Moldova in this case. The breakaway republic of Transnistria is the Eastern bank, hence the name.

    Next week. We have Wessex, Sussex, Essex, Middlesex but no Norrex. Why not?
    Well its Transnistria from our point of view, but Cisnistria from theirs. Indeed, I think that's what they call it.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 28,437
    Andy_JS said:

    Betty Snowball's record score of 189 for England is under threat from Tammy Beaumont.

    She's done it. 192 not out.
  • WhisperingOracleWhisperingOracle Posts: 9,260
    edited June 2023
    This person tends to give correct reports from sattelite data, so if right the Wagner forces are only the distance away from the blessed Margaret's place in Grantham to London, which in a country as huge as Russia is like being, literally, next door. It's also another source claiming the Wagner forces are aiming to secure nuclear sites, if you read down.

    https://twitter.com/WarMach18898344/status/1672611809323532288
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,959
    edited June 2023
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 55,035
    dixiedean said:

    According to various people scanning satellite data, part of the Wagner forces are already in Tula, which is only about 180km from Moscow, or about 110 miles.

    Putin really is in trouble.

    Are they in Tula or Tula Oblast?
    The latter wouldn't be a surprise as they were reported in Yelets about an hour ago.
    PS. Am surprised at the relatively short distances involved.
    I suppose we always think of Russia West to East.
    Rostov to Moscow is around 1,200km by road. Average 80kph and it’s 15 hours.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,032

    Sandpit said:

    Darth Putin
    @DarthPutinKGB
    Wagner took 9 months to capture Bakhmut and 3 hours to capture Rostov.

    https://twitter.com/DarthPutinKGB/status/1672514271438053376

    Whoever runs that account, is having a lot of fun today.
    It looks to have a limited lifespan, so making the most of it...

    I wondered if whoever runs it realised quite how it would end up, given it started back in 2012.
    It very much reminds me of Sauron's blog: https://saurons.home.blog/ which is a hilarious alternative history of Middle Earth from Sauron's perspective.
  • CorrectHorseBatCorrectHorseBat Posts: 1,761
    Shocking that this coup will end up going nowhere.

    As soon as Leon gets excited about anything it's time to admit defeat. If he told me it was raining I would go outside and check
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 52,149
    Farooq said:

    geoffw said:

    ydoethur said:

    Leon said:


    Visegrád 24
    @visegrad24
    ·
    2m
    BREAKING:

    The Wagner Group has announced that most of the Russian Army units in the Lipetsk region have switched sides and joined the Wagner Group military column heading toward Moscow

    1. It is Visegrad, and they can be quite excitable if not outright mendacious

    2. Wagner Group would say this, wouldn't they?

    3. Bloody hell Ken, what if it's true??

    It does make some sense. If you're a young Russian male about to be thrown into the meat-paste-machine that is Ukraine, why not throw in your lot with Wagner, and hopefully avoid a real war altogether. It's a massive risk, but then so is fighting enraged Ukrainians with NATO weapons
    Again, the Petrograd garrison, 1917.

    Why did they mutiny?

    Because they had been told they were about to be sent to the Front.
    It wasn't called Petrograd till 1924

    1914
    St Pedro'sburg to 1914
    Petrograd 1914 to 1924
    Leningrad 1924 to 1991
    St Pedro'sburg from 1991
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 28,437
    Andy_JS said:

    Betty Snowball's record lasted for 88 years. Congrats Tammy Beaumont. Can she get a double century?

    Hope so, for all her heroics, we are still 57 runs behind Australia.
  • boulayboulay Posts: 5,558

    Farooq said:

    geoffw said:

    ydoethur said:

    Leon said:


    Visegrád 24
    @visegrad24
    ·
    2m
    BREAKING:

    The Wagner Group has announced that most of the Russian Army units in the Lipetsk region have switched sides and joined the Wagner Group military column heading toward Moscow

    1. It is Visegrad, and they can be quite excitable if not outright mendacious

    2. Wagner Group would say this, wouldn't they?

    3. Bloody hell Ken, what if it's true??

    It does make some sense. If you're a young Russian male about to be thrown into the meat-paste-machine that is Ukraine, why not throw in your lot with Wagner, and hopefully avoid a real war altogether. It's a massive risk, but then so is fighting enraged Ukrainians with NATO weapons
    Again, the Petrograd garrison, 1917.

    Why did they mutiny?

    Because they had been told they were about to be sent to the Front.
    It wasn't called Petrograd till 1924

    1914
    St Pedro'sburg to 1914
    Petrograd 1914 to 1924
    Leningrad 1924 to 1991
    St Pedro'sburg from 1991
    Whatever they call it it’s one of my favourite cities and hope one day to be able to go back if things become vaguely sane again.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,395

    On topic (for which I apologise), I see the LibDems in Somerton & Frome have been pumping out a local fake newspaper, the Somerset Clarion. Some irony in that the Clarion tradition was firmly socialist...

    https://twitter.com/Lib_Dem_Watch/status/1672588593594871808

    I've got to ask you to sit down before I tell you the bad news about the Daily Telegraph.
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,318
    Farooq said:

    Carnyx said:

    dixiedean said:

    viewcode said:

    Farooq said:

    Farooq said:

    glw said:

    Leon said:

    Sean_F said:

    How we’ve sunk as a nation. 60 years ago, there’s be a group of men in Whitehall, laughing in British, as they orchestrated the coup.

    With our deep involvement in the Ukrainian war, I'd be surprised if there isn't UK intel and special ops involvement on this front, as well

    The Kremlin's paranoia about "British spies" might well be justified
    When Putin is hooded and stood on the gallows, just before they open the trapdoor I hope someone leans over and whipsers in his ear "Greetings from Salisbury."
    and Mayfair
    and Kyiv
    and Georgia
    and Luhansk
    [clunk gasp crack]
    and Donetsk
    and Washington
    and Crimea
    and
    Transnistria!
    Cisnistria
    No it's the other side of the [D]niester river. Cisnistria would be the Western bank, which would be Moldova in this case. The breakaway republic of Transnistria is the Eastern bank, hence the name.

    Next week. We have Wessex, Sussex, Essex, Middlesex but no Norrex. Why not?
    Hertfordshire in the way?
    Mercia. IIRC Mercia extended to London, and the Thames was the border. And Londoners then as now thought they were the centre of the cosmos.
    Mercia gets its name from is being a border territory. Mercia has the same root as "march" as in the Welsh Marches, marquis (=lord of the border country), and Mersey (=border river, which was also the border of... Mercia!)
    I thought the Mercians started at the Trent and then moved to Tamworth. Kind of thought the border inherent in “Mercia” was indeed the Marches.
  • This person tends to give correct reports from sattelite data, so if right the Wagner forces are only the distance away from the blessed Margaret's place in Grantham to London, which in a country as huge as Russia is like being, literally, next door.

    https://twitter.com/WarMach18898344

    If they're north of Tula already then they're almost at Moscow and will be there, unless they stop, in only a few hours.

    Have to echo what @rcs1000 said, this site is well ahead of the media. Got the BBC on for the first time in forever, News 24, and the reporting there is running about 6 hours behind us.
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,318

    According to various people scanning satellite data, part of the Wagner forces are already in Tula, which is only about 180km from Moscow, or about 110 miles.

    Putin really is in trouble.

    Come on, feet, start moving
    Got to get me there…

    Twenty-five miles from Moscow
    My feet are hurting mighty bad
    Now, I've been walking for three days and two lonely nights
    You know that I'm mighty mad, huh
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 28,437
    New thread.
  • SeaShantyIrish2SeaShantyIrish2 Posts: 17,559
    kle4 said:

    Doomscrolling war news sounds better.
    Russian state rolling news channel Rossiya 24 isn't ignoring events entirely, but the fact they're currently airing a documentary about Silvio Berlusconi tells you quite a lot
    https://twitter.com/francis_scarr/status/1672587240634036225?cxt=HHwWgsC93fnOnLYuAAAA

    With a bit o' luck, Mad Vlad will be joining Scumbag Silvio for a bunga-bunga party . . . in Hell.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,959
    Women's Ashes cricket and a coup in Russia. What's not to like?
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 52,149
    ydoethur said:

    ..

    kinabalu said:

    kinabalu said:

    kinabalu said:

    kinabalu said:

    I think the wishes for chaos in Russia are unwise.

    A country as vast and well-armed as that does not spiral into chaos without it affecting large areas of the rest of the world, for diverse, military, migratory , and economic reasons. It wouldn't be something we could just cheerfully watch from our armchairs.

    Hopefully there will be a full blown civil war and the country will be less vast and less well armed by the end of it.
    C'mon. This is heartless, blase and juvenile.
    I have plenty of heart for the victims of Moscow's aggression.

    Which includes plenty of every day Russians who are repressed and sent to the meat grinder in order to support Moscow's regime.

    The collapse of Russia as a unitary state would be great news for the world, and great news for ordinary Russians.

    Why are you so heartless as to oppose that?
    But a 'full blown civil war in Russia' - your words - really isn't something to hope for. It'd be terrible in and of itself plus nobody can model where it leads with any confidence at all.
    A full-blown civil war would be the second-best option possible, behind a rapid victory for one side or the other who immediately decides to withdraw Russian forces from Ukraine as a result.

    Given that Putin launched this war, and Prigozhin willingly smashed Bakhmut to pieces over several months, I don't have much hope for the ideal scenario. A full-blown civil war is a more likely path to Russian troops leaving Ukraine, as they are pulled back to fight on one side or the other. And then Ukraine will know peace, and can start the long process of reconstruction and dealing with the grief of its losses.

    So, yeah, I'm pretty down with hoping for a Russian civil war actually. If Putin does do a runner and Prigozhin takes over without a fight, and simply continues the war in Ukraine for more months of violence and destruction, I don't see that as a preferable outcome.
    The potential carnage from that scenario is massive and we have no clue where it would lead. If a bloody disintegration of Russia were to happen, with various 'big man' psychopaths trading atrocities, I'd be hoping the resulting horrors are limited to Russia, that whatever sort of Russia emerges from it is better than this one, and of course that it leads to the liberation of Ukraine, but there's no way on earth I'm hoping it happens in the first place.
    Imagine you have the choice between two different futures in four weeks time.

    In scenario 1, Prigozhin's rebellion is rapidly defeated, or rapidly victorious, and the Russian army remains fighting in Ukraine. Ukrainian cities continue to face bombardment from Russian missiles and artillery shells. The war continues. The Ukrainian counterattack makes progress, but inevitably there are many casualties, both Ukrainian and Russian.

    In scenario 2, Prigozhin's rebellion makes some progress, but Putin fights on. There is fighting in and around Moscow and millions of civilians flee. Russian army units are redeployed from Ukraine and declare for either side, leading to heavy fighting across south-western Russia. Ukraine liberates its territory, and the war with Russia comes to an end. The bombardment of Ukrainian cities is brought to an end, and Ukrainian civilians are freed from Russian occupation. Ukraine can begin the massive task of reconstruction, mine-clearing and grieving. Many Ukrainian soldiers are able to return to their families. Boris Johnson visits Ukraine and takes selfies with Zelenskyy in Mariupol.

    Surely scenario 2 is preferable to scenario 1?
    Hmm, very probably. But you've left it hanging a bit. Where's that Russian civil war going? If you promise me it doesn't trigger more horrors than those we're saving in Ukraine you might have a deal. Can you?
    Just so.
    The last Russian civil war lasted 6 years, caused c.1.5m deaths and the US and UK backed the losing side.
    Since when is 1917 to 1921 six years???
    The Civil War began in 1918.
    Kornilov did a Prigozhin in 1917.
    image
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 55,035

    This person tends to give correct reports from sattelite data, so if right the Wagner forces are only the distance away from the blessed Margaret's place in Grantham to London, which in a country as huge as Russia is like being, literally, next door.

    https://twitter.com/WarMach18898344

    If they're north of Tula already then they're almost at Moscow and will be there, unless they stop, in only a few hours.

    Have to echo what @rcs1000 said, this site is well ahead of the media. Got the BBC on for the first time in forever, News 24, and the reporting there is running about 6 hours behind us.
    I’m also watching BBC World News, and they had a guy going into maps of the area and the road to Moscow. But they’ve been re-running the same report for the last three hours!
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 52,149
    Cicero said:

    The Kalinauski Regiment and the Belarusian government in exile have issued a declaration to the Belarusian armed forces and the people of the country to begin a new uprising to overthrow the dictator an end Russian control in the country.

    Zhive Belarus!

    They are the world's longest serving Government-in-exile, since 1919.
  • sladeslade Posts: 2,081

    On topic (for which I apologise), I see the LibDems in Somerton & Frome have been pumping out a local fake newspaper, the Somerset Clarion. Some irony in that the Clarion tradition was firmly socialist...

    https://twitter.com/Lib_Dem_Watch/status/1672588593594871808

    On topic (for which I apologise), I see the LibDems in Somerton & Frome have been pumping out a local fake newspaper, the Somerset Clarion. Some irony in that the Clarion tradition was firmly socialist...

    https://twitter.com/Lib_Dem_Watch/status/1672588593594871808

    As 25,000 Wagnerians march on Moscow 250 Lib Dems invade Frome.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 52,149
    Cookie said:

    viewcode said:

    Farooq said:

    Farooq said:

    glw said:

    Leon said:

    Sean_F said:

    How we’ve sunk as a nation. 60 years ago, there’s be a group of men in Whitehall, laughing in British, as they orchestrated the coup.

    With our deep involvement in the Ukrainian war, I'd be surprised if there isn't UK intel and special ops involvement on this front, as well

    The Kremlin's paranoia about "British spies" might well be justified
    When Putin is hooded and stood on the gallows, just before they open the trapdoor I hope someone leans over and whipsers in his ear "Greetings from Salisbury."
    and Mayfair
    and Kyiv
    and Georgia
    and Luhansk
    [clunk gasp crack]
    and Donetsk
    and Washington
    and Crimea
    and
    Transnistria!
    Cisnistria
    No it's the other side of the [D]niester river. Cisnistria would be the Western bank, which would be Moldova in this case. The breakaway republic of Transnistria is the Eastern bank, hence the name.

    Next week. We have Wessex, Sussex, Essex, Middlesex but no Norrex. Why not?
    Well its Transnistria from our point of view, but Cisnistria from theirs. Indeed, I think that's what they call it.
    "Middle East" from our point of view, "West Asia" from anywhere east of Iran.
  • Pro_RataPro_Rata Posts: 5,352
    1000th
  • ohnotnowohnotnow Posts: 4,028
    viewcode said:
    That twitter account doesn't look terribly reliable? Can't see it being reported anywhere else? Though I can see TASS saying he was about to make a statement.
  • Pro_RataPro_Rata Posts: 5,352
    Oh, c'mon, don't say Vanilla caps it now at 999. What's an OCD'er to do?
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,679
    edited June 2023

    kinabalu said:

    kinabalu said:

    kinabalu said:

    kinabalu said:

    kinabalu said:

    I think the wishes for chaos in Russia are unwise.

    A country as vast and well-armed as that does not spiral into chaos without it affecting large areas of the rest of the world, for diverse, military, migratory , and economic reasons. It wouldn't be something we could just cheerfully watch from our armchairs.

    Hopefully there will be a full blown civil war and the country will be less vast and less well armed by the end of it.
    C'mon. This is heartless, blase and juvenile.
    I have plenty of heart for the victims of Moscow's aggression.

    Which includes plenty of every day Russians who are repressed and sent to the meat grinder in order to support Moscow's regime.

    The collapse of Russia as a unitary state would be great news for the world, and great news for ordinary Russians.

    Why are you so heartless as to oppose that?
    But a 'full blown civil war in Russia' - your words - really isn't something to hope for. It'd be terrible in and of itself plus nobody can model where it leads with any confidence at all.
    A full-blown civil war would be the second-best option possible, behind a rapid victory for one side or the other who immediately decides to withdraw Russian forces from Ukraine as a result.

    Given that Putin launched this war, and Prigozhin willingly smashed Bakhmut to pieces over several months, I don't have much hope for the ideal scenario. A full-blown civil war is a more likely path to Russian troops leaving Ukraine, as they are pulled back to fight on one side or the other. And then Ukraine will know peace, and can start the long process of reconstruction and dealing with the grief of its losses.

    So, yeah, I'm pretty down with hoping for a Russian civil war actually. If Putin does do a runner and Prigozhin takes over without a fight, and simply continues the war in Ukraine for more months of violence and destruction, I don't see that as a preferable outcome.
    The potential carnage from that scenario is massive and we have no clue where it would lead. If a bloody disintegration of Russia were to happen, with various 'big man' psychopaths trading atrocities, I'd be hoping the resulting horrors are limited to Russia, that whatever sort of Russia emerges from it is better than this one, and of course that it leads to the liberation of Ukraine, but there's no way on earth I'm hoping it happens in the first place.
    Imagine you have the choice between two different futures in four weeks time.

    In scenario 1, Prigozhin's rebellion is rapidly defeated, or rapidly victorious, and the Russian army remains fighting in Ukraine. Ukrainian cities continue to face bombardment from Russian missiles and artillery shells. The war continues. The Ukrainian counterattack makes progress, but inevitably there are many casualties, both Ukrainian and Russian.

    In scenario 2, Prigozhin's rebellion makes some progress, but Putin fights on. There is fighting in and around Moscow and millions of civilians flee. Russian army units are redeployed from Ukraine and declare for either side, leading to heavy fighting across south-western Russia. Ukraine liberates its territory, and the war with Russia comes to an end. The bombardment of Ukrainian cities is brought to an end, and Ukrainian civilians are freed from Russian occupation. Ukraine can begin the massive task of reconstruction, mine-clearing and grieving. Many Ukrainian soldiers are able to return to their families. Boris Johnson visits Ukraine and takes selfies with Zelenskyy in Mariupol.

    Surely scenario 2 is preferable to scenario 1?
    Hmm, very probably. But you've left it hanging a bit. Where's that Russian civil war going? If you promise me it doesn't trigger more horrors than those we're saving in Ukraine you might have a deal. Can you?
    You can't promise that a continuation of the Russian war in Ukraine won't result in further horrors, like the destruction of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant. So, yes, there are terrible uncertainties in both future scenarios.

    So concentrate on what we know. A civil war in Russia will end the war in Ukraine. That's a good trade in my view.
    I can't promise that. That's the point. It's not a trade, as in a chess match or something, it's a development with unknowable and potentially cataclysmic consequences. To go back to where we started - the notion of actively hoping for a 'full blown civil war in Russia'. To me 'full blown civil war' sounds utterly horrendous, both for the carnage and chaos it would cause in Russia and the potential for overspill. It's just not a 'hoping for' type of event.

    I don't believe you're truly hoping for it either. What you want to see is just enough internal shit in Russia to get them to quit Ukraine and not a penny more. I'd like to see that too but it depends on how much 'shit' it takes. I'm certainly not about to 'hope' for the ruination and collapse of Russia, or the deaths of millions of Russian people. Putin is 100% to blame, he started this war, but I don't feel the suffering of Russians counts as nothing compared to Ukrainians.
    Your apologia for Russian fascism is truly disturbing and betrays a lack of sense and humanity.

    Ukrainians are the victims in this, not Russia. Seeing a continuation of war crimes in Ukraine is not something to desire, to avoid a collapse of Russia.

    Even Russia quitting Ukraine and "not a penny more" leaves Putin's fascist regime in charge of Russia and repressing Russia's people.

    A relatively peaceful overthrow of Putin is more desirable than a protracted civil war, sure, but either of a simply overthrow or a civil war are infinitely preferable to seeing Russia continue invading other nations.
    My revulsion for Putin's aggression towards Ukraine and his sinister repressive regime hasn't led me to not give a shit about the suffering of Russian people. If that's what's happened with you, I'd suggest it's you with the problem.
  • Pro_RataPro_Rata Posts: 5,352
    The lag in the numbers incrementing, 1002 now, it's like being on a petrol pump. Grrrr.
  • CorrectHorseBatCorrectHorseBat Posts: 1,761
    "The most important thing... is for all parties to be responsible and to protect civilians"

    PM Rishi Sunak responds to the military situation in Russia in an exclusive interview with Laura Kuenssberg

    https://twitter.com/BBCPolitics/status/1672615551838076928

    He did Ed Miliband.
  • TazTaz Posts: 15,049

    Shocking that this coup will end up going nowhere.

    As soon as Leon gets excited about anything it's time to admit defeat. If he told me it was raining I would go outside and check

    It’s only doomed when rogerdamus backs it.
  • Penddu2Penddu2 Posts: 719
    kle4 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Farooq said:

    Sean_F said:

    How we’ve sunk as a nation. 60 years ago, there’s be a group of men in Whitehall, laughing in British, as they orchestrated the coup.

    You misspelled "grown". We're better when we don't fuck other people's countries up.
    It would be a remarkable group discussing a coup in ancient Welsh.
    They've played a long game, the ancient welsh. 1500 years or so but they are just about ready to strike back at the anglo-saxon invaders.
    Rydyn ni yma o hyd.....
This discussion has been closed.