Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

YouGov’s CON members’ polling head to heads – politicalbetting.com

15678911»

Comments

  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,902

    LATEST POLLING ON TORY LEADERSHIP RACE

    Opinium @ObserverUK poll shows public opinion undecided on Rishi Sunak and Liz Truss:

    > 43% think Sunak would be good PM vs 45% bad (net -2)
    > 36% think Truss would be good PM vs 41% bad (net -6) https://t.co/KC8i1jh1Sh

    Sorry but this polling is pointless in my view - The British public don't know them from Adam and Eve yet.
    The focus should be on Tory members.
  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,155
    Liz Truss has said she will extend the controversial Rwanda asylum scheme, in a move to firm up support among Tory party voters in the race to succeed Boris Johnson.

    The Foreign Secretary, in an interview with the Mail on Sunday, suggested that as Prime Minister she would extend the Rwanda policy, despite it currently being in legal limbo.

    Mail on Sunday
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,793
    edited July 2022

    This thread has got stuck in traffic jam in Dover

  • Options
    nico679nico679 Posts: 4,729

    nico679 said:

    They tried to stiff us over Erasmus. I’m all for student exchange, have hosted loads, but it should be reasonable.

    Except that’s not true . The EU wanted the UK to sign up for 7 years which is the normal timeframe for third countries and pay an association fee . This wasn’t controversial. The UK only wanted to participate in elements of Erasmus and wouldn’t commit to the full time period .

    It’s more about some in governments hatred of anything that continues strong cultural ties with the EU .
    Right - an association fee for exchanges. That’s the bit that is wrong. It’s about exchange, so why pay an association fee?
    An association fee is what you pay as a third country . EU Erasmus students put in approx 440 million pounds into the UK economy .
  • Options
    Sean_F said:

    The problem I have with the "slavery fuelled the Industrial Revolution" argument is that slavery and slave trading both retard economic development.

    The USA gives us the perfect worked example. By 1860, the Free North East and Mid West was industrialising swiftly, the Slave South barely at all. The profits of slaving generally went not to investing in new businesses and industries, but to expensive forms of conspicuous consumption - grand houses, artworks, race horses, and fancy slaves, whose prices got bid upwards. Slavery also fostered a mentality among the slave owners that works against hard work, sobriety, innovation, all the things you need to grow new businesses. Most slavers died heavily in debt because of their absurdly lavish lifestyles.

    Likewise the Ottoman Empire and its vassal states owned and traded slaves on a vast scale, and sponsored slave hunting in Africa, to the great benefit of much of their elite, but to no benefit at all for the mass of the population. Ditto Spanish and Portugese America, whose economies were stagnating by the 1800's.

    The Industrial Revolution was disproportionately the work of nonconformists, the types of people who tended mostly to despise slavery.

    This is completely right.

    Slavery was like Free Movement for minimum wage labour, it acted to prevent and stop development in alternatives that removed the need for people.

    The Industrial Revolution was about how to get more, with fewer people, which was the antithesis of slavery.
  • Options
    MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 25,043
    kinabalu said:

    murali_s said:

    murali_s said:

    Signing off for now but to coin a phrase “nothing has changed”.

    Brexit = a calamity
    Brexiteers = morons

    Goodnight!

    Only 10% of your nearly 3,000 posts has ever got a like, and you have flags and offtopics at over a 10% ratio of those - which must be a near record high ratio.

    People aren't exactly loving your content.
    I’m not here for likes. If the moderators think I am out of line, they will do the needful.

    The fact you had to make this comment is more a reflection of you, rather than me.

    Er, no. It's a reflection of you.

    The "votes" speak for themselves.
    But you were just moaning before about really bad posts getting lots of likes!

    Now you're saying no likes = bad posts.

    What is THIS a reflection of?
    Way off topic

    I am old enough to remember a cabal of three or four wild-eyed PB Tories who would express their solidarity by "liking" each other's shared dreary right wing fantasies. One could amuse oneself by guessing which of the others had given a particularly dull post a "like".
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,940

    Rishi Sunak looks more like a PM in waiting than Keir Starmer and Liz Truss, but none of them look like an obvious PM.

    > 34% agree Sunak looks like a PM in waiting vs 35% disagree (net -1)
    > Starmer: 30% agree vs 39% disagree (net -9)
    > Truss: 25% agree vs 37% disagree (net -12) https://t.co/DKqrYzaNqH

    Really shows more folk haven't heard of Liz Truss
    imho. Which is a drawback and an opportunity.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,267
    Brendan May: "Global citizen, EU passport holder 🇪🇺, British resident."

    In other words, a wanker.
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,011
    edited July 2022
    Unexpectedly, it's Truss who seems to be benefiting from more exposure. Even people who started out as "anyone but Truss" are warming to her.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,267
    kinabalu said:

    murali_s said:

    murali_s said:

    Signing off for now but to coin a phrase “nothing has changed”.

    Brexit = a calamity
    Brexiteers = morons

    Goodnight!

    Only 10% of your nearly 3,000 posts has ever got a like, and you have flags and offtopics at over a 10% ratio of those - which must be a near record high ratio.

    People aren't exactly loving your content.
    I’m not here for likes. If the moderators think I am out of line, they will do the needful.

    The fact you had to make this comment is more a reflection of you, rather than me.

    Er, no. It's a reflection of you.

    The "votes" speak for themselves.
    But you were just moaning before about really bad posts getting lots of likes!

    Now you're saying no likes = bad posts.

    What is THIS a reflection of?
    I'm saying no likes at all over a career = bad poster.

    Bad individual posts can still get plenty of likes, normally by the herd circling to protect one of their own.
  • Options
    nico679nico679 Posts: 4,729

    Brendan May: "Global citizen, EU passport holder 🇪🇺, British resident."

    In other words, a wanker.
    So reporting facts is now being a wanker. The deal is loaded towards New Zealand farmers to the detriment of UK ones .
  • Options

    Unexpectedly, it's Truss who seems to be benefiting from more exposure. Even people who started out as "anyone but Truss" are warming to her.

    In the same way you warm to an electric kettle.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,267

    Absolutely. Stuff any whinging interest groups wanting to be sheltered from competition.

    If Kiwi lamb is better or cheaper than British lamb, why shouldn't we take advantage of that?
    Why should we be worried* about nation of 5 million 12,000 miles away selling us some extra tariff-free frozen lamb to a nation of 65 million?

    It's exactly the situation pre-1980, which was a great benefit to us.

    (*Incidentally, I bet the very same people moan about red-meat and climate change and drone on about veganism, but find it convenient not to do so in this case)
  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,155
    Chris Williamson has written a biography.

    Ten Hard Years
    https://www.lolabooks.eu/products/ten-years-hard-labour-chris-williamson

    Ken Loach likes it.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,267

    If you were forced to choose, which of these would you prefer?

    A Labour government led by Keir Starmer: 40%
    A Conservative government led by Liz Truss: 39%

    via @OpiniumResearch, 21-22 Jul

    On these numbers it really doesn't support the notion that Liz Truss is an inevitable electoral disaster.

    At this stage.
  • Options
    MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 25,043

    Brendan May: "Global citizen, EU passport holder 🇪🇺, British resident."

    In other words, a wanker.
    Calm down dear. He is only pointing out what most of us already understood.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,267

    murali_s said:

    murali_s said:

    Signing off for now but to coin a phrase “nothing has changed”.

    Brexit = a calamity
    Brexiteers = morons

    Goodnight!

    Only 10% of your nearly 3,000 posts has ever got a like, and you have flags and offtopics at over a 10% ratio of those - which must be a near record high ratio.

    People aren't exactly loving your content.
    I’m not here for likes. If the moderators think I am out of line, they will do the needful.

    The fact you had to make this comment is more a reflection of you, rather than me.

    You've ruffled his feathers and he will now target you. You're doing well, keep going!
    Ah, the hypersensitive snowflake speaks.

    One who can dish it out, but absolutely can't take it.
    You get angry about signs in Waterloo station saying don't be racist
    It was "sexist hate stops with men", actually. And it's you who hasn't been able to shut up about them ever since, not me.
    You can never shut up about wokeism is destroying the world, this is just the latest example of it. Even though nobody actually knows or cares what you are on about.
    And yet you keep going back to it and referencing it yourself, repeatedly, day after day.

    Which means you yourself are thinking about it a lot, because you know, at some level, I have a point.
  • Options
    another_richardanother_richard Posts: 25,046
    Sean_F said:

    The problem I have with the "slavery fuelled the Industrial Revolution" argument is that slavery and slave trading both retard economic development.

    The USA gives us the perfect worked example. By 1860, the Free North East and Mid West was industrialising swiftly, the Slave South barely at all. The profits of slaving generally went not to investing in new businesses and industries, but to expensive forms of conspicuous consumption - grand houses, artworks, race horses, and fancy slaves, whose prices got bid upwards. Slavery also fostered a mentality among the slave owners that works against hard work, sobriety, innovation, all the things you need to grow new businesses. Most slavers died heavily in debt because of their absurdly lavish lifestyles.

    Likewise the Ottoman Empire and its vassal states owned and traded slaves on a vast scale, and sponsored slave hunting in Africa, to the great benefit of much of their elite, but to no benefit at all for the mass of the population. Ditto Spanish and Portugese America, whose economies were stagnating by the 1800's.

    The Industrial Revolution was disproportionately the work of nonconformists, the types of people who tended mostly to despise slavery.

    Likewise the Russian Empire was based upon the effective slavery of serfdom but was industrially backward.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,267
    nico679 said:

    Brendan May: "Global citizen, EU passport holder 🇪🇺, British resident."

    In other words, a wanker.
    So reporting facts is now being a wanker. The deal is loaded towards New Zealand farmers to the detriment of UK ones .
    Er, no. It's mutual free access - a level playing field.

    If you look at this nobber's feed it's the usual FBPE obsessive, as his treacherous description of himself as "global citizen" (but a British resident) highlights.

    I have utter and absolute contempt for non-patriots. Utter disgust.
  • Options
    MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 25,043
    edited July 2022

    nico679 said:

    Brendan May: "Global citizen, EU passport holder 🇪🇺, British resident."

    In other words, a wanker.
    So reporting facts is now being a wanker. The deal is loaded towards New Zealand farmers to the detriment of UK ones .
    Er, no. It's mutual free access - a level playing field.

    If you look at this nobber's feed it's the usual FBPE obsessive, as his treacherous description of himself as "global citizen" (but a British resident) highlights.

    I have utter and absolute contempt for non-patriots. Utter disgust.
    Is that why you just off topiced me.? I thought my post related to both the headline topic and the thread I was replying to.
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,238
    edited July 2022
    ttt
This discussion has been closed.