Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Time to Think the Unthinkable?

SystemSystem Posts: 11,687
edited November 2019 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Time to Think the Unthinkable?

“History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce”

Read the full story here


«1345678

Comments

  • Options
    DeClareDeClare Posts: 483
    John McDonnell will never present a budget.
  • Options
    Lovely to see the Tories embracing bigotry, xenophobia and ignorance so wholeheartedly. One thing we do know: anyone who says they are voting Tory because of Labour anti-Semitism is not serious about combatting racism.
    https://twitter.com/mattholehouse/status/1200688354192437249?s=21
  • Options
    olmolm Posts: 125
    edited November 2019
    Good article, but wrong conclusion, missing the main point.

    If there's a hung parliament, Lab WILL form a minority.

    If there's a hung parliament and Lab call a vote of no confidence in Johnson, they will win (with LD, SNP, and SDLP, ALL, PC, and GRN and IND (E Devon?) ... and Boris is out.

    Then, in that 14 days that follow, Johnson can't win another VONC, thus Corbyn will be asked to form a gov.

    If Con call a VONC in Corbyn, Corbyn will win - it will fall to how the LDs vote. They will likely abstain and Lab stay in, with a minority, subject to the LD and SNP etc... moderating.

    I very much doubt LD would vote against Lab in the second VONC, as they would lose the opportunity of a referendum and would be seen as the spoilers (Brexit and Tory enablers) in the resulting election and be destroyed even more than 2015.
  • Options
    olmolm Posts: 125
    DeClare said:

    John McDonnell will never present a budget.

    I don't think so.
    In the event of a hung parliament, Johnson can't retain support, Corbyn will with huge caveats and moderation.
    Lab will present a careful budget, subject to meeting the requirements of LD, SNP, and others to ensure it passes (i.e. that LD abstain, and SNP and others pass).
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,937
    edited November 2019

    Lovely to see the Tories embracing bigotry, xenophobia and ignorance so wholeheartedly. One thing we do know: anyone who says they are voting Tory because of Labour anti-Semitism is not serious about combatting racism.
    https://twitter.com/mattholehouse/status/1200688354192437249?s=21

    That's not racism, and screaming racist like the boy who cried wolf is part of the reason we are where we are.

    People who oppose racism also oppose bigotry and xenophobia. If you’re happy to embrace the profound ignorance that sees the children of foreign born taxpayers labelled as a burden then you are not serious about combatting terrorism.

  • Options
    FloaterFloater Posts: 14,195
    https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/b/unite-vows-to-fight-to-save-npower-jobs

    I may have missed the Unions vowing to fight those massive Labour job cuts
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,287
    olm said:

    Good article, but wrong conclusion, missing the main point.

    If there's a hung parliament, Lab WILL form a minority.

    If there's a hung parliament and Lab call a vote of no confidence in Johnson, they will win (with LD, SNP, and SDLP, ALL, PC, and GRN and IND (E Devon?) ... and Boris is out.

    Then, in that 14 days that follow, Johnson can't win another VONC, thus Corbyn will be asked to form a gov.

    Some people do not understand quite how this works...
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,287
    Floater said:
    Did @Cyclefree ever get a reply to her question?
  • Options
    olmolm Posts: 125
    Also it's of note that the numbers will be tighter for Tories, as the author pointed out, the DUP are not given to support Johnson. The DUP might abstain or vote against LAB and CON.
    Even if they voted against Corbyn,
    a) their numbers are likely to be no more than 8, rather than the previous 10
    b) Alliance and SDLP will likely have seats that come into play, on Corbyn's side (SDLP) or abstaining (Alliance?) (as opposed to the SF seats that are not in play).
    In a tight numbers game, that will be crucial.
    Additionally, the Lab rebels (and LD and Con) have largely been routed or departed...
    So as the author points out, a much cleaner party line when it comes to VONC and Brexit votes....
  • Options
    FloaterFloater Posts: 14,195

    Lovely to see the Tories embracing bigotry, xenophobia and ignorance so wholeheartedly. One thing we do know: anyone who says they are voting Tory because of Labour anti-Semitism is not serious about combatting racism.
    https://twitter.com/mattholehouse/status/1200688354192437249?s=21

    That's not racism, and screaming racist like the boy who cried wolf is part of the reason we are where we are.

    People who oppose racism also oppose bigotry and xenophobia. If your happy to embrace the profound ignorance that sees the children of foreign born taxpayers labelled as a burden then you are not serious about combatting terrorism.

    Now you are moving your point - you specifically mentioned racism.

    Do you have school age children?

    Even if you don't you should be at least aware of several reports going back to the last Labour government of the strains on the system caused by mass immigration.

    Unless you want to claim all of those were racist too?
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,287
    olm said:

    Also it's of note that the numbers will be tighter for Tories, as the author pointed out, the DUP are not given to support Johnson. The DUP might abstain or vote against LAB and CON.
    Even if they voted against Corbyn,
    a) their numbers are likely to be no more than 8, rather than the previous 10
    b) Alliance and SDLP will likely have seats that come into play, on Corbyn's side (SDLP) or abstaining (Alliance?) (as opposed to the SF seats that are not in play).
    In a tight numbers game, that will be crucial.
    Additionally, the Lab rebels (and LD and Con) have largely been routed or departed...
    So as the author points out, a much cleaner party line when it comes to VONC and Brexit votes....

    The DUP have already said they will not help Corbyn into government.
    https://news.sky.com/story/general-election-dup-will-not-support-labour-under-jeremy-corbyn-11873951
    If therefore Johnson gets within 20-odd, Corbyn can’t form a government without the ACTIVE support of the Liberal Democrats, which I don’t think he will get.
    Try not to confuse wishful thinking with analysis.
  • Options
    FloaterFloater Posts: 14,195
    ydoethur said:

    olm said:

    Good article, but wrong conclusion, missing the main point.

    If there's a hung parliament, Lab WILL form a minority.

    If there's a hung parliament and Lab call a vote of no confidence in Johnson, they will win (with LD, SNP, and SDLP, ALL, PC, and GRN and IND (E Devon?) ... and Boris is out.

    Then, in that 14 days that follow, Johnson can't win another VONC, thus Corbyn will be asked to form a gov.

    Some people do not understand quite how this works...
    Can you imagine anything worse than trying to herd that bunch of cats?

    Apart from a Corbyn government obviously
  • Options
    olmolm Posts: 125
    edited November 2019
    So in a hung parliament, Corbyn is guaranteed unless:

    a) numbers are very tight and DUP go with Johnson and against Corbyn - is that likely? Abstain on both more likely. Unless they force Johnson's hand (if they have the numbers) and he changes Brexit withdrawal agreement again, then what with the EU?

    and/or

    b) LD vote against Corbyn rather than abstaining... which might lead to their demolition in the resulting election (from disappointed Remainers, and disappointed anti-Tories)
  • Options
    Gabs3Gabs3 Posts: 836

    Lovely to see the Tories embracing bigotry, xenophobia and ignorance so wholeheartedly. One thing we do know: anyone who says they are voting Tory because of Labour anti-Semitism is not serious about combatting racism.
    https://twitter.com/mattholehouse/status/1200688354192437249?s=21

    The assessmemt is wrong but its not racist. They are makimg a point about overall numbers not saying EU27 people are bad or immoral in some way.
  • Options
    FloaterFloater Posts: 14,195

    Lovely to see the Tories embracing bigotry, xenophobia and ignorance so wholeheartedly. One thing we do know: anyone who says they are voting Tory because of Labour anti-Semitism is not serious about combatting racism.
    https://twitter.com/mattholehouse/status/1200688354192437249?s=21

    That's not racism, and screaming racist like the boy who cried wolf is part of the reason we are where we are.
    It is used as an attempt to shut down debate.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,287
    olm said:

    So in a hung parliament, Corbyn is guaranteed unless:

    a) numbers are very tight and DUP go with Johnson and against Corbyn - is that likely?

    YES. In fact, it might be considered nearly certain.
    Do you bother to read replies to your posts?
  • Options
    FloaterFloater Posts: 14,195
    ydoethur said:

    olm said:

    So in a hung parliament, Corbyn is guaranteed unless:

    a) numbers are very tight and DUP go with Johnson and against Corbyn - is that likely?

    YES. In fact, it might be considered nearly certain.
    Do you bother to read replies to your posts?
    Shh - there is a narrative to push
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,898
    Floater said:
    That was inevitable after the Catholic Herald spotted the language on abortion in the Labour manifesto.
  • Options
    olmolm Posts: 125
    ydoethur said:

    olm said:

    Good article, but wrong conclusion, missing the main point.

    If there's a hung parliament, Lab WILL form a minority.

    If there's a hung parliament and Lab call a vote of no confidence in Johnson, they will win (with LD, SNP, and SDLP, ALL, PC, and GRN and IND (E Devon?) ... and Boris is out.

    Then, in that 14 days that follow, Johnson can't win another VONC, thus Corbyn will be asked to form a gov.

    Some people do not understand quite how this works...
    Care to expand on that/explain?
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,287
    Just had to light the stove.
    Annoyingly, the sun’s gone in so I can’t heat the house off the sunroom at the moment.
  • Options
    DeClareDeClare Posts: 483
    Floater said:

    https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/b/unite-vows-to-fight-to-save-npower-jobs

    I may have missed the Unions vowing to fight those massive Labour job cuts

    There's fierce competition, people are switching energy suppliers when they find cheaper alternatives, the growing alternative suppliers will have to take on new staff.
    Bit like no one works for British Home Stores anymore but plenty of people now work for Primark.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,287
    edited November 2019
    olm said:

    ydoethur said:

    olm said:

    Good article, but wrong conclusion, missing the main point.

    If there's a hung parliament, Lab WILL form a minority.

    If there's a hung parliament and Lab call a vote of no confidence in Johnson, they will win (with LD, SNP, and SDLP, ALL, PC, and GRN and IND (E Devon?) ... and Boris is out.

    Then, in that 14 days that follow, Johnson can't win another VONC, thus Corbyn will be asked to form a gov.

    Some people do not understand quite how this works...
    Care to expand on that/explain?
    It’s not ‘Corbyn will be invited to form a government if Johnson can’t win a vote of confidence.’ It is that during that fourteen days Corbyn or AN Other would have had to demonstrate he had the confidence of the house, or there would be a further election.
    Corbyn clearly cannot command the confidence of the house unless there is a Labour majority. The question is, would he stand aside for another? Again, probably not as he has repeatedly ruled it out.
  • Options
    Certainly this election now has the look and feel of 2017 - all very unfocussed, rambling and disjointed. This is not ideal for Boris: he desperately needed a huge chunk of the nation to unite around his 'Get Brexit Done' rallying cry. In fact, Brexit has seemed like a fringe issue.
  • Options
    Ave_itAve_it Posts: 2,411
    Remember: if you vote LAB LD SNP or GRN you get hard left CORBYNISTA STURGEON government!
  • Options
    Gabs3 said:

    Lovely to see the Tories embracing bigotry, xenophobia and ignorance so wholeheartedly. One thing we do know: anyone who says they are voting Tory because of Labour anti-Semitism is not serious about combatting racism.
    https://twitter.com/mattholehouse/status/1200688354192437249?s=21

    The assessmemt is wrong but its not racist. They are makimg a point about overall numbers not saying EU27 people are bad or immoral in some way.

    Where did I say it was racist?

  • Options
    olmolm Posts: 125
    ydoethur said:

    olm said:

    So in a hung parliament, Corbyn is guaranteed unless:

    a) numbers are very tight and DUP go with Johnson and against Corbyn - is that likely?

    YES. In fact, it might be considered nearly certain.
    Do you bother to read replies to your posts?
    I'm not sure why you're being so rude.
    Yes I do read replies. I was writing that post before I'd seen the reply. The website doesn't update instantly as you're writing....
  • Options
    nunu2nunu2 Posts: 1,453

    Lovely to see the Tories embracing bigotry, xenophobia and ignorance so wholeheartedly. One thing we do know: anyone who says they are voting Tory because of Labour anti-Semitism is not serious about combatting racism.
    https://twitter.com/mattholehouse/status/1200688354192437249?s=21

    Rubbish. We have a right to control immigration.

    I'm glad Tories are finally campaigning on immigration.
  • Options
    OT but Shelvey could have just helped Liverpool there more than he ever did in a red shirt.
  • Options
    brokenwheelbrokenwheel Posts: 3,352
    edited November 2019

    Lovely to see the Tories embracing bigotry, xenophobia and ignorance so wholeheartedly. One thing we do know: anyone who says they are voting Tory because of Labour anti-Semitism is not serious about combatting racism.
    https://twitter.com/mattholehouse/status/1200688354192437249?s=21

    That's not racism, and screaming racist like the boy who cried wolf is part of the reason we are where we are.

    People who oppose racism also oppose bigotry and xenophobia. If you’re happy to embrace the profound ignorance that sees the children of foreign born taxpayers labelled as a burden then you are not serious about combatting terrorism.

    Except what you quoted is none of the above, and trying to make out it is just convinces people to switch off to real racism such as is happening within the Left.
    But what really gets me is you seem to be trying to link anti-racism and combatting terrorism, which is shockingly naive. Remind me, how many Polish terrorists have we had? Chinese? Indian Hindus? Are you saying they've never experienced racism?
  • Options
    ozymandiasozymandias Posts: 1,503
    olm said:

    ydoethur said:

    olm said:

    So in a hung parliament, Corbyn is guaranteed unless:

    a) numbers are very tight and DUP go with Johnson and against Corbyn - is that likely?

    YES. In fact, it might be considered nearly certain.
    Do you bother to read replies to your posts?
    I'm not sure why you're being so rude.
    Yes I do read replies. I was writing that post before I'd seen the reply. The website doesn't update instantly as you're writing....
    Olm = Chb.
  • Options
    drmacfdrmacf Posts: 12
    Just checking, Corbyn keeps talking about the NHS.
    What has Labour done for the NHS in Labour ruled Wales?
    I can say for certain, that the NHS in Wales is poorly run, gives a poorer service and some places even corrupt. When compared to England.
  • Options
    Floater said:

    Lovely to see the Tories embracing bigotry, xenophobia and ignorance so wholeheartedly. One thing we do know: anyone who says they are voting Tory because of Labour anti-Semitism is not serious about combatting racism.
    https://twitter.com/mattholehouse/status/1200688354192437249?s=21

    That's not racism, and screaming racist like the boy who cried wolf is part of the reason we are where we are.

    People who oppose racism also oppose bigotry and xenophobia. If your happy to embrace the profound ignorance that sees the children of foreign born taxpayers labelled as a burden then you are not serious about combatting terrorism.

    Now you are moving your point - you specifically mentioned racism.

    Do you have school age children?

    Even if you don't you should be at least aware of several reports going back to the last Labour government of the strains on the system caused by mass immigration.

    Unless you want to claim all of those were racist too?

    I mentioned racism because those who are serious about combatting it do not indulge in bigotry and xenophobia. If you do not meet demand you put strains on the school system. The Tories are claiming that providing school places for the children of EU citizens will place extra burdens on the taxpayer. They fail to note that EU citizens are taxpayers, too, and that spending on education is an investment that delivers huge benefits.
  • Options
    nunu2nunu2 Posts: 1,453
    Floater said:

    Lovely to see the Tories embracing bigotry, xenophobia and ignorance so wholeheartedly. One thing we do know: anyone who says they are voting Tory because of Labour anti-Semitism is not serious about combatting racism.
    https://twitter.com/mattholehouse/status/1200688354192437249?s=21

    That's not racism, and screaming racist like the boy who cried wolf is part of the reason we are where we are.
    It is used as an attempt to shut down debate.
    The left dont understand that them shutting down debate on this issue, is why we have Trump and Leave.
    They will never ever get it. The right can promise big spending but the left are too afraid to utter the words "controlled immigration".
  • Options
    WhisperingOracleWhisperingOracle Posts: 8,503
    edited November 2019
    nunu2 said:

    Floater said:

    Lovely to see the Tories embracing bigotry, xenophobia and ignorance so wholeheartedly. One thing we do know: anyone who says they are voting Tory because of Labour anti-Semitism is not serious about combatting racism.
    https://twitter.com/mattholehouse/status/1200688354192437249?s=21

    That's not racism, and screaming racist like the boy who cried wolf is part of the reason we are where we are.
    It is used as an attempt to shut down debate.
    The left dont understand that them shutting down debate on this issue, is why we have Trump and Leave.
    They will never ever get it. The right can promise big spending but the left are too afraid to utter the words "controlled immigration".
    I can't hear anyone from the Right telling the truth about Brexit and immigration to Leave voters - that EU immigration will be replaced by immigration from India and China, as an absolutely basic condition of trade deals going ahead.
  • Options
    olm said:

    Good article, but wrong conclusion, missing the main point.

    If there's a hung parliament, Lab WILL form a minority.

    If there's a hung parliament and Lab call a vote of no confidence in Johnson, they will win (with LD, SNP, and SDLP, ALL, PC, and GRN and IND (E Devon?) ... and Boris is out.

    Then, in that 14 days that follow, Johnson can't win another VONC, thus Corbyn will be asked to form a gov.

    If Con call a VONC in Corbyn, Corbyn will win - it will fall to how the LDs vote. They will likely abstain and Lab stay in, with a minority, subject to the LD and SNP etc... moderating.

    I very much doubt LD would vote against Lab in the second VONC, as they would lose the opportunity of a referendum and would be seen as the spoilers (Brexit and Tory enablers) in the resulting election and be destroyed even more than 2015.

    If LDs abstain then the Tories might have enough to win that vote.
  • Options

    Floater said:

    Lovely to see the Tories embracing bigotry, xenophobia and ignorance so wholeheartedly. One thing we do know: anyone who says they are voting Tory because of Labour anti-Semitism is not serious about combatting racism.
    https://twitter.com/mattholehouse/status/1200688354192437249?s=21

    That's not racism, and screaming racist like the boy who cried wolf is part of the reason we are where we are.

    People who oppose racism also oppose bigotry and xenophobia. If your happy to embrace the profound ignorance that sees the children of foreign born taxpayers labelled as a burden then you are not serious about combatting terrorism.

    Now you are moving your point - you specifically mentioned racism.

    Do you have school age children?

    Even if you don't you should be at least aware of several reports going back to the last Labour government of the strains on the system caused by mass immigration.

    Unless you want to claim all of those were racist too?

    I mentioned racism because those who are serious about combatting it do not indulge in bigotry and xenophobia. If you do not meet demand you put strains on the school system. The Tories are claiming that providing school places for the children of EU citizens will place extra burdens on the taxpayer. They fail to note that EU citizens are taxpayers, too, and that spending on education is an investment that delivers huge benefits.
    You need to be on £35k a year to pass the threshold between contributor and net recipient. All those migrant workers in chicken factories, and picking fruit for minimum wage (plus a lovely sloops of child benefit and tax credits) are going to be paying next to no taxes.
  • Options
    nunu2 said:

    Floater said:

    Lovely to see the Tories embracing bigotry, xenophobia and ignorance so wholeheartedly. One thing we do know: anyone who says they are voting Tory because of Labour anti-Semitism is not serious about combatting racism.
    https://twitter.com/mattholehouse/status/1200688354192437249?s=21

    That's not racism, and screaming racist like the boy who cried wolf is part of the reason we are where we are.
    It is used as an attempt to shut down debate.
    The left dont understand that them shutting down debate on this issue, is why we have Trump and Leave.
    They will never ever get it. The right can promise big spending but the left are too afraid to utter the words "controlled immigration".

    What debate are we having? The government is declaring the children of EU citizens a burden on taxpayers while failing to acknowledge that EU citizens are themselves taxpayers or that investing in educating children delivers multiple benefits.
  • Options
    drmacfdrmacf Posts: 12
    The Tories are no doubt nasty and don't care for the poor. However JC knows that he will never win a majority and form a Govt on his own. Despite this being his second election and 9 years of crippling austerity. So rather than stepping aside and allowing an electable Labour leader, who may reverse austerity and end this misery, he still soldiers on. In his delusion belief of a communist utopia.
    So in other words, he cares for the poor and the needy as much as the Tories do. Which is 'we don't give a Fk in reality'. At least the Tories are upfront about it.
  • Options
    nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    olm said:

    Good article, but wrong conclusion, missing the main point.

    If there's a hung parliament, Lab WILL form a minority.

    If there's a hung parliament and Lab call a vote of no confidence in Johnson, they will win (with LD, SNP, and SDLP, ALL, PC, and GRN and IND (E Devon?) ... and Boris is out.

    Then, in that 14 days that follow, Johnson can't win another VONC, thus Corbyn will be asked to form a gov.

    If Con call a VONC in Corbyn, Corbyn will win - it will fall to how the LDs vote. They will likely abstain and Lab stay in, with a minority, subject to the LD and SNP etc... moderating.

    I very much doubt LD would vote against Lab in the second VONC, as they would lose the opportunity of a referendum and would be seen as the spoilers (Brexit and Tory enablers) in the resulting election and be destroyed even more than 2015.

    Here we go again if Johnson loses a confidence vote and no on else is able to demonstrate confidence we’re on the way to potentially an election two weeks after we leave the EU without a deal. But it’s fairy story thinking the you gov mrp is wrong only in it is overstating labour.
  • Options

    Floater said:

    Lovely to see the Tories embracing bigotry, xenophobia and ignorance so wholeheartedly. One thing we do know: anyone who says they are voting Tory because of Labour anti-Semitism is not serious about combatting racism.
    https://twitter.com/mattholehouse/status/1200688354192437249?s=21

    That's not racism, and screaming racist like the boy who cried wolf is part of the reason we are where we are.

    People who oppose racism also oppose bigotry and xenophobia. If your happy to embrace the profound ignorance that sees the children of foreign born taxpayers labelled as a burden then you are not serious about combatting terrorism.

    Now you are moving your point - you specifically mentioned racism.

    Do you have school age children?

    Even if you don't you should be at least aware of several reports going back to the last Labour government of the strains on the system caused by mass immigration.

    Unless you want to claim all of those were racist too?

    I mentioned racism because those who are serious about combatting it do not indulge in bigotry and xenophobia. If you do not meet demand you put strains on the school system. The Tories are claiming that providing school places for the children of EU citizens will place extra burdens on the taxpayer. They fail to note that EU citizens are taxpayers, too, and that spending on education is an investment that delivers huge benefits.
    You need to be on £35k a year to pass the threshold between contributor and net recipient. All those migrant workers in chicken factories, and picking fruit for minimum wage (plus a lovely sloops of child benefit and tax credits) are going to be paying next to no taxes.
    Do you have even the slightest idea how many high-earning EU nationals from France and Germany, for instance, there have been in Britain, over the last 10 years ?

    Many have already left, incidentally.
  • Options

    Lovely to see the Tories embracing bigotry, xenophobia and ignorance so wholeheartedly. One thing we do know: anyone who says they are voting Tory because of Labour anti-Semitism is not serious about combatting racism.
    https://twitter.com/mattholehouse/status/1200688354192437249?s=21

    That's not racism, and screaming racist like the boy who cried wolf is part of the reason we are where we are.

    People who oppose racism also oppose bigotry and xenophobia. If you’re happy to embrace the profound ignorance that sees the children of foreign born taxpayers labelled as a burden then you are not serious about combatting terrorism.

    Except what you quoted is none of the above, and trying to make out it is just convinces people to switch off to real racism such as is happening within the Left.
    But what really gets me is you seem to be trying to link anti-racism and combatting terrorism, which is shockingly naive. Remind me, how many Polish terrorists have we had? Chinese? Indian Hindus? Are you saying they've never experienced racism?

    Where did I mention terrorism?

    It is pure bigotry and xenophobia to imply that EU citizens are not taxpayers and that educating their children is a burden.
  • Options

    Floater said:

    Lovely to see the Tories embracing bigotry, xenophobia and ignorance so wholeheartedly. One thing we do know: anyone who says they are voting Tory because of Labour anti-Semitism is not serious about combatting racism.
    https://twitter.com/mattholehouse/status/1200688354192437249?s=21

    That's not racism, and screaming racist like the boy who cried wolf is part of the reason we are where we are.

    People who oppose racism also oppose bigotry and xenophobia. If your happy to embrace the profound ignorance that sees the children of foreign born taxpayers labelled as a burden then you are not serious about combatting terrorism.

    Now you are moving your point - you specifically mentioned racism.

    Do you have school age children?

    Even if you don't you should be at least aware of several reports going back to the last Labour government of the strains on the system caused by mass immigration.

    Unless you want to claim all of those were racist too?

    I mentioned racism because those who are serious about combatting it do not indulge in bigotry and xenophobia. If you do not meet demand you put strains on the school system. The Tories are claiming that providing school places for the children of EU citizens will place extra burdens on the taxpayer. They fail to note that EU citizens are taxpayers, too, and that spending on education is an investment that delivers huge benefits.
    You need to be on £35k a year to pass the threshold between contributor and net recipient. All those migrant workers in chicken factories, and picking fruit for minimum wage (plus a lovely sloops of child benefit and tax credits) are going to be paying next to no taxes.

    They are paying exactly the same taxes as anyone else doing those jobs and earning those wages.

  • Options
    nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483

    OT but Shelvey could have just helped Liverpool there more than he ever did in a red shirt.


    Liverpool are going to have to decide which games to lose and which competitions they want to win or they may fall flat on their face.
  • Options
    nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    Ave_it said:

    Remember: if you vote LAB LD SNP or GRN you get hard left CORBYNISTA STURGEON government!


    Stop talking crap
  • Options
    speedy2speedy2 Posts: 981
    edited November 2019
    I think a hung parliament is more likely than usual due to the Brexit party standing in mostly Labour seats.
    It makes it very difficult for both the Conservatives to win seats and the Conservatives to lose seats, the national swing required almost doubles in both cases.
    With an identical voting result (43-41) as last time the Conservatives would be short by 14 (312 seats assuming 5 less due to tactical voting).
    So what matters for a PM Corbyn to be installed is the DUP and the other Irish parties (UUP, SDLP ect), a repeat election in February would be more likely than usual.
  • Options
    Bring on the polls - let every right-of-centre / non-socialist voter in the country who's tempted to go LD or BXP or abstain see just how close to power Jeremy Corbyn, John McDonnell, and Diane Abbott are.

    And then they can't say they weren't warned when the bill for Labour's promises comes due.
  • Options
    Ave_itAve_it Posts: 2,411
    nichomar said:

    Ave_it said:

    Remember: if you vote LAB LD SNP or GRN you get hard left CORBYNISTA STURGEON government!


    Stop talking crap
    Hello nichomar the usual considered response from you.

    If LAB win you will have to sell your Spanish hacienda 😊
  • Options
    kinabalukinabalu Posts: 39,226
    IMO we get a Corbyn government if Lab + SNP is greater than Con + DUP.
  • Options
    ChrisChris Posts: 11,134
    The BBC reports a comment from Jo Swinson about the fact that Usman Khan had been released on licence:
    "I want to us to understand the details of this and the questions that need to be asked about how decisions are made on release and how risks are assessed on that basis."

    I'm a bit unsure whether she's saying she doesn't understand how decisions are made about releasing people on licence and thinks she ought to, or what.
  • Options
    viewcodeviewcode Posts: 18,823
    edited November 2019
    @stodge
    Thank you for your article. I find increasing gossip concerning a hung parliament baffling since I think ConMaj is the most probable outcome, but reality does not bend to me so I have to consider the possibility. So thank you for the info.

    However, I note you do stuff on ah.com. With that in mind may I present perhaps the least-read non-political timeline ever, which was left unfinished due to illness.

    Other readers may also wish to peruse probably the best-written political timeline, one of the writers of which (not me!) is I believe an occasional contributor here
  • Options
    Mr. Blue, except that the whole country pays the price if the far left gets its grubby hands on power.
  • Options
    JasonJason Posts: 1,614

    Certainly this election now has the look and feel of 2017 - all very unfocussed, rambling and disjointed. This is not ideal for Boris: he desperately needed a huge chunk of the nation to unite around his 'Get Brexit Done' rallying cry. In fact, Brexit has seemed like a fringe issue.

    It's amazing how short people's memories are. It's up to the Tories to ram home that message in these final two weeks. A Sturgeon/Corbyn far left fantasy government with fantasy budgets ought to be an oh so easy target for any competent opposition going into an election.

    The Tories really need to start getting their act together - and fast - before one of the biggest nightmares this country has ever faced starts becoming a reality.
  • Options
    nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    Ave_it said:

    nichomar said:

    Ave_it said:

    Remember: if you vote LAB LD SNP or GRN you get hard left CORBYNISTA STURGEON government!


    Stop talking crap
    Hello nichomar the usual considered response from you.

    If LAB win you will have to sell your Spanish hacienda 😊
    Well saying it is simply not true that voting for anything but a Tory will get you corbyn is not quite as powerful.
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,898
    nichomar said:

    OT but Shelvey could have just helped Liverpool there more than he ever did in a red shirt.


    Liverpool are going to have to decide which games to lose and which competitions they want to win or they may fall flat on their face.
    The only trophy they’re going to care about this year is the league trophy - they’ve not won it in the Premier League era, were last champions back in 1990.
  • Options
    kinabalu said:

    IMO we get a Corbyn government if Lab + SNP is greater than Con + DUP.

    That would require Labour to gain 30-40 seats overall - and that is not going to happen. The DUP will not support Johnson’s WA. But the Tories should have a comfortable majority without them.

  • Options
    wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 6,934
    Chris said:

    The BBC reports a comment from Jo Swinson about the fact that Usman Khan had been released on licence:
    "I want to us to understand the details of this and the questions that need to be asked about how decisions are made on release and how risks are assessed on that basis."

    I'm a bit unsure whether she's saying she doesn't understand how decisions are made about releasing people on licence and thinks she ought to, or what.

    I think shes waiting for the children to present their collage made from all the interesting things found on the woodland walk which may make things clearer
  • Options
    Jason said:

    Certainly this election now has the look and feel of 2017 - all very unfocussed, rambling and disjointed. This is not ideal for Boris: he desperately needed a huge chunk of the nation to unite around his 'Get Brexit Done' rallying cry. In fact, Brexit has seemed like a fringe issue.

    It's amazing how short people's memories are. It's up to the Tories to ram home that message in these final two weeks. A Sturgeon/Corbyn far left fantasy government with fantasy budgets ought to be an oh so easy target for any competent opposition going into an election.

    The Tories really need to start getting their act together - and fast - before one of the biggest nightmares this country has ever faced starts becoming a reality.
    One hopes so. Cummings did the leave hard work in the last 2 weeks. It better be the same now.
  • Options
    speedy2speedy2 Posts: 981
    edited November 2019
    Looking at the previous thread at what went wrong for the LD, I think we should ask what has gone wrong so far for the Conservatives, I think the list of mistakes is as follows:
    1.They started their campaign 8 days after everyone else.
    2.Their campaign head is a foreigner from the other side of the world.
    3.The decision to debate Corbyn one on one.
    4.The the Labour manifesto being a huge success again.
    5.The Conservative manifesto being a huge dud again.
    On point 5, the Conservative manifesto is so empty it can fit on the back of a small card.
    On point 2, it's always a bad sign when your campaign is headed by a non local (see Jim Messina).
  • Options
    wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 6,934
    Sandpit said:

    nichomar said:

    OT but Shelvey could have just helped Liverpool there more than he ever did in a red shirt.


    Liverpool are going to have to decide which games to lose and which competitions they want to win or they may fall flat on their face.
    The only trophy they’re going to care about this year is the league trophy - they’ve not won it in the Premier League era, were last champions back in 1990.
    As a Leeds fan I very much hope not. The fact we have won the top flight more recently than the Scouse tossers is a crumb of comfort in our current exile
  • Options
    nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    Sandpit said:

    nichomar said:

    OT but Shelvey could have just helped Liverpool there more than he ever did in a red shirt.


    Liverpool are going to have to decide which games to lose and which competitions they want to win or they may fall flat on their face.
    The only trophy they’re going to care about this year is the league trophy - they’ve not won it in the Premier League era, were last champions back in 1990.
    Sandpit said:

    nichomar said:

    OT but Shelvey could have just helped Liverpool there more than he ever did in a red shirt.


    Liverpool are going to have to decide which games to lose and which competitions they want to win or they may fall flat on their face.
    The only trophy they’re going to care about this year is the league trophy - they’ve not won it in the Premier League era, were last champions back in 1990.
    That’s what I think too.
  • Options

    Mr. Blue, except that the whole country pays the price if the far left gets its grubby hands on power.

    I know that very well. I'm just saying that it's a good thing that the voters who are enabling a Corbyn + SNP government should have full advance knowledge of the outcome they're creating, and their responsibility for it.
  • Options
    nichomar said:

    OT but Shelvey could have just helped Liverpool there more than he ever did in a red shirt.


    Liverpool are going to have to decide which games to lose and which competitions they want to win or they may fall flat on their face.
    At this rate Liverpool can concentrate on the Cups. Man City are doing their best at taking the pressure off Liverpool.

    Until the New Year is insane with fixtures but if we can get through to the New Year with a healthy cushion and hopefully a second trophy this season already then the run to the end of the season could be very interesting.

    The Reds have one trophy and are still in five competitions. That has to be unprecedented by this stage if think?
  • Options
    speedy2speedy2 Posts: 981
    edited November 2019
    kinabalu said:

    IMO we get a Corbyn government if Lab + SNP is greater than Con + DUP.

    Not really, you probably get a Corbyn government if the total seats of CON+DUP is less than 323.
  • Options
    wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 6,934

    nichomar said:

    OT but Shelvey could have just helped Liverpool there more than he ever did in a red shirt.


    Liverpool are going to have to decide which games to lose and which competitions they want to win or they may fall flat on their face.
    At this rate Liverpool can concentrate on the Cups. Man City are doing their best at taking the pressure off Liverpool.

    Until the New Year is insane with fixtures but if we can get through to the New Year with a healthy cushion and hopefully a second trophy this season already then the run to the end of the season could be very interesting.

    The Reds have one trophy and are still in five competitions. That has to be unprecedented by this stage if think?
    Unprecedented since Man City did it last year
  • Options
    StreeterStreeter Posts: 684
    Ave_it said:

    Remember: if you vote LAB LD SNP or GRN you get hard left CORBYNISTA STURGEON government!

    Yeah, it’s great isn’t it?
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,125

    Chris said:

    The BBC reports a comment from Jo Swinson about the fact that Usman Khan had been released on licence:
    "I want to us to understand the details of this and the questions that need to be asked about how decisions are made on release and how risks are assessed on that basis."

    I'm a bit unsure whether she's saying she doesn't understand how decisions are made about releasing people on licence and thinks she ought to, or what.

    I think shes waiting for the children to present their collage made from all the interesting things found on the woodland walk which may make things clearer
    Ouch!
    Bloody cold out there today. The pile of leaflets is still depressingly large.
    Off to brave the cold winds some more. I may be gone some while....
  • Options
    wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 6,934
    speedy2 said:

    kinabalu said:

    IMO we get a Corbyn government if Lab + SNP is greater than Con + DUP.

    Not really, you probably get a Corbyn government if the total seats of CON+DUP is less than 323.
    No you dont. You get a Corbyn govt if Lab plus SNP plus PC plus Greens plus SDLP is greater than the rest
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,929
    speedy2 said:

    kinabalu said:

    IMO we get a Corbyn government if Lab + SNP is greater than Con + DUP.

    Not really, you probably get a Corbyn government if the total seats of CON+DUP is less than 323.
    Con + DUP + 1/2 Sinn Fein + 1/2 Lib Dem (Abstain on both Johnson and potential Corbyn QS) might be the critical figure.
  • Options

    nichomar said:

    OT but Shelvey could have just helped Liverpool there more than he ever did in a red shirt.


    Liverpool are going to have to decide which games to lose and which competitions they want to win or they may fall flat on their face.
    At this rate Liverpool can concentrate on the Cups. Man City are doing their best at taking the pressure off Liverpool.

    Until the New Year is insane with fixtures but if we can get through to the New Year with a healthy cushion and hopefully a second trophy this season already then the run to the end of the season could be very interesting.

    The Reds have one trophy and are still in five competitions. That has to be unprecedented by this stage if think?
    Unprecedented since Man City did it last year
    Man City were only in 4 Competitions this stage last year weren't they? Not 5.
  • Options
    wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 6,934

    Chris said:

    The BBC reports a comment from Jo Swinson about the fact that Usman Khan had been released on licence:
    "I want to us to understand the details of this and the questions that need to be asked about how decisions are made on release and how risks are assessed on that basis."

    I'm a bit unsure whether she's saying she doesn't understand how decisions are made about releasing people on licence and thinks she ought to, or what.

    I think shes waiting for the children to present their collage made from all the interesting things found on the woodland walk which may make things clearer
    Ouch!
    Bloody cold out there today. The pile of leaflets is still depressingly large.
    Off to brave the cold winds some more. I may be gone some while....
    Enjoy
    I had my saucer of milk this morning ready for mega polling saturday quipping
  • Options
    BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 7,994

    nunu2 said:

    Floater said:

    Lovely to see the Tories embracing bigotry, xenophobia and ignorance so wholeheartedly. One thing we do know: anyone who says they are voting Tory because of Labour anti-Semitism is not serious about combatting racism.
    https://twitter.com/mattholehouse/status/1200688354192437249?s=21

    That's not racism, and screaming racist like the boy who cried wolf is part of the reason we are where we are.
    It is used as an attempt to shut down debate.
    The left dont understand that them shutting down debate on this issue, is why we have Trump and Leave.
    They will never ever get it. The right can promise big spending but the left are too afraid to utter the words "controlled immigration".

    What debate are we having? The government is declaring the children of EU citizens a burden on taxpayers while failing to acknowledge that EU citizens are themselves taxpayers or that investing in educating children delivers multiple benefits.
    And that we haven't had to pay for the education and training of the EU adults, and they are generally not old and therefore not a burden on the NHS.
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,898

    Chris said:

    The BBC reports a comment from Jo Swinson about the fact that Usman Khan had been released on licence:
    "I want to us to understand the details of this and the questions that need to be asked about how decisions are made on release and how risks are assessed on that basis."

    I'm a bit unsure whether she's saying she doesn't understand how decisions are made about releasing people on licence and thinks she ought to, or what.

    I think shes waiting for the children to present their collage made from all the interesting things found on the woodland walk which may make things clearer
    Ouch!
    Bloody cold out there today. The pile of leaflets is still depressingly large.
    Off to brave the cold winds some more. I may be gone some while....
    Keep up the good work!
  • Options
    kinabalukinabalu Posts: 39,226
    edited November 2019

    That would require Labour to gain 30-40 seats overall - and that is not going to happen. The DUP will not support Johnson’s WA. But the Tories should have a comfortable majority without them.

    PM Corbyn is not going to happen. The best realistic outcome for Labour is hung parliament with Cons just short and having to cobble something together. Maybe having to cave in on Ref2. The Boris Deal vs Remain. I think Con landslide is more likely than hung parliament and my central betting call remains Con majority in the mid to high 2 digits. I'm long of Con majority at 15 and I am not closing it.
  • Options
    wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 6,934

    nichomar said:

    OT but Shelvey could have just helped Liverpool there more than he ever did in a red shirt.


    Liverpool are going to have to decide which games to lose and which competitions they want to win or they may fall flat on their face.
    At this rate Liverpool can concentrate on the Cups. Man City are doing their best at taking the pressure off Liverpool.

    Until the New Year is insane with fixtures but if we can get through to the New Year with a healthy cushion and hopefully a second trophy this season already then the run to the end of the season could be very interesting.

    The Reds have one trophy and are still in five competitions. That has to be unprecedented by this stage if think?
    Unprecedented since Man City did it last year
    Man City were only in 4 Competitions this stage last year weren't they? Not 5.
    Oh you're including the tuppeny hapenny world club cup? In which case probably
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,287
    kinabalu said:

    IMO we get a Corbyn government if Lab + SNP is greater than Con + DUP.

    Agreed, but it seems unlikely at the moment.
    That could change, of course.
  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    edited November 2019
    Barnesian said:

    nunu2 said:

    Floater said:

    Lovely to see the Tories embracing bigotry, xenophobia and ignorance so wholeheartedly. One thing we do know: anyone who says they are voting Tory because of Labour anti-Semitism is not serious about combatting racism.
    https://twitter.com/mattholehouse/status/1200688354192437249?s=21

    That's not racism, and screaming racist like the boy who cried wolf is part of the reason we are where we are.
    It is used as an attempt to shut down debate.
    The left dont understand that them shutting down debate on this issue, is why we have Trump and Leave.
    They will never ever get it. The right can promise big spending but the left are too afraid to utter the words "controlled immigration".

    What debate are we having? The government is declaring the children of EU citizens a burden on taxpayers while failing to acknowledge that EU citizens are themselves taxpayers or that investing in educating children delivers multiple benefits.
    And that we haven't had to pay for the education and training of the EU adults, and they are generally not old and therefore not a burden on the NHS.
    Unless you plan to deport them before they get old the fact they are not old yet doesn't matter. They will get old and we will pay for them then.

    Saying they're not old now is like suggesting if we borrow money we are making money because we suddenly have more of it - while ignoring the interest to be paid in the future.

    The future cost of healthcare and pensions needs to be accounted for today in any cost/benefit analysis.
  • Options
    speedy2speedy2 Posts: 981

    speedy2 said:

    kinabalu said:

    IMO we get a Corbyn government if Lab + SNP is greater than Con + DUP.

    Not really, you probably get a Corbyn government if the total seats of CON+DUP is less than 323.
    No you dont. You get a Corbyn govt if Lab plus SNP plus PC plus Greens plus SDLP is greater than the rest
    I don't think the LD would vote against a Labour government especially after a weak result for them, or any of the small parties except the DUP and maybe the UUP due to the risk of a super squeeze in a February election.
  • Options
    wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 6,934
    edited November 2019
    speedy2 said:

    speedy2 said:

    kinabalu said:

    IMO we get a Corbyn government if Lab + SNP is greater than Con + DUP.

    Not really, you probably get a Corbyn government if the total seats of CON+DUP is less than 323.
    No you dont. You get a Corbyn govt if Lab plus SNP plus PC plus Greens plus SDLP is greater than the rest
    I don't think the LD would vote against a Labour government especially after a weak result for them, or any of the small parties except the DUP and maybe the UUP due to the risk of a super squeeze in a February election.
    The LDs wont put Corbyn in number 10. Period. And if they have (say) 13 seats they will want another go asap, not ballsing it up under Swinson this time.
  • Options
    kinabalukinabalu Posts: 39,226
    ydoethur said:

    Agreed, but it seems unlikely at the moment.
    That could change, of course.

    VERY unlikely IMO. But, yes, usual caveats apply.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,287
    speedy2 said:

    speedy2 said:

    kinabalu said:

    IMO we get a Corbyn government if Lab + SNP is greater than Con + DUP.

    Not really, you probably get a Corbyn government if the total seats of CON+DUP is less than 323.
    No you dont. You get a Corbyn govt if Lab plus SNP plus PC plus Greens plus SDLP is greater than the rest
    I don't think the LD would vote against a Labour government especially after a weak result for them, or any of the small parties except the DUP and maybe the UUP due to the risk of a super squeeze in a February election.
    I think the point that needs reiterating is that unless they vote for a Labour Government there is most unlikely to be one.
  • Options
    speedy2speedy2 Posts: 981

    speedy2 said:

    speedy2 said:

    kinabalu said:

    IMO we get a Corbyn government if Lab + SNP is greater than Con + DUP.

    Not really, you probably get a Corbyn government if the total seats of CON+DUP is less than 323.
    No you dont. You get a Corbyn govt if Lab plus SNP plus PC plus Greens plus SDLP is greater than the rest
    I don't think the LD would vote against a Labour government especially after a weak result for them, or any of the small parties except the DUP and maybe the UUP due to the risk of a super squeeze in a February election.
    The LDs wont put Corbyn in number 10. Period. And if they have (say) 13 seats they will want another go asap, not ballsing it up under Swinson this time.
    In a February election I would expect all small parties to be super squeezed, the LD would not risk evaporation into thin air by having a repeat election, they could end up with 8 seats again or less.
  • Options

    nichomar said:

    OT but Shelvey could have just helped Liverpool there more than he ever did in a red shirt.


    Liverpool are going to have to decide which games to lose and which competitions they want to win or they may fall flat on their face.
    At this rate Liverpool can concentrate on the Cups. Man City are doing their best at taking the pressure off Liverpool.

    Until the New Year is insane with fixtures but if we can get through to the New Year with a healthy cushion and hopefully a second trophy this season already then the run to the end of the season could be very interesting.

    The Reds have one trophy and are still in five competitions. That has to be unprecedented by this stage if think?
    Unprecedented since Man City did it last year
    Man City were only in 4 Competitions this stage last year weren't they? Not 5.
    Oh you're including the tuppeny hapenny world club cup? In which case probably
    Well yes that's how I got to five.

    Considering you need to be European Champions to end the Club World Cup I can understand why other clubs may not think of that one.
  • Options

    Barnesian said:

    nunu2 said:

    Floater said:

    Lovely to see the Tories embracing bigotry, xenophobia and ignorance so wholeheartedly. One thing we do know: anyone who says they are voting Tory because of Labour anti-Semitism is not serious about combatting racism.
    https://twitter.com/mattholehouse/status/1200688354192437249?s=21

    That's not racism, and screaming racist like the boy who cried wolf is part of the reason we are where we are.
    It is used as an attempt to shut down debate.
    The left dont understand that them shutting down debate on this issue, is why we have Trump and Leave.
    They will never ever get it. The right can promise big spending but the left are too afraid to utter the words "controlled immigration".

    What debate are we having? The government is declaring the children of EU citizens a burden on taxpayers while failing to acknowledge that EU citizens are themselves taxpayers or that investing in educating children delivers multiple benefits.
    And that we haven't had to pay for the education and training of the EU adults, and they are generally not old and therefore not a burden on the NHS.
    Unless you plan to deport them before they get old the fact they are not old yet doesn't matter. They will get old and we will pay for them then.

    Saying they're not old now is like suggesting if we borrow money we are making money because we suddenly have more of it - while ignoring the interest to be paid in the future.

    The future cost of healthcare and pensions needs to be accounted for today in any cost/benefit analysis.

    There are three times as many UK citizens of pensionable age living in the EU27 as there are EU citizens of pensionable age living in the UK.

    EU citizens that have lived in the UK during their working lives and then retire here will have paid tax just like anyone else.

  • Options
    ClippPClippP Posts: 1,687
    nichomar said:

    Ave_it said:

    Remember: if you vote LAB LD SNP or GRN you get hard left CORBYNISTA STURGEON government!

    Stop talking crap
    I have sometimes wondered, over the years, if Ave It isn`t in real life a certain ABDPJohnson.
  • Options
    nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483

    Barnesian said:

    nunu2 said:

    Floater said:

    Lovely to see the Tories embracing bigotry, xenophobia and ignorance so wholeheartedly. One thing we do know: anyone who says they are voting Tory because of Labour anti-Semitism is not serious about combatting racism.
    https://twitter.com/mattholehouse/status/1200688354192437249?s=21

    That's not racism, and screaming racist like the boy who cried wolf is part of the reason we are where we are.
    It is used as an attempt to shut down debate.
    The left dont understand that them shutting down debate on this issue, is why we have Trump and Leave.
    They will never ever get it. The right can promise big spending but the left are too afraid to utter the words "controlled immigration".

    What debate are we having? The government is declaring the children of EU citizens a burden on taxpayers while failing to acknowledge that EU citizens are themselves taxpayers or that investing in educating children delivers multiple benefits.
    And that we haven't had to pay for the education and training of the EU adults, and they are generally not old and therefore not a burden on the NHS.
    Unless you plan to deport them before they get old the fact they are not old yet doesn't matter. They will get old and we will pay for them then.

    Saying they're not old now is like suggesting if we borrow money we are making money because we suddenly have more of it - while ignoring the interest to be paid in the future.

    The future cost of healthcare and pensions needs to be accounted for today in any cost/benefit analysis.

    There are three times as many UK citizens of pensionable age living in the EU27 as there are EU citizens of pensionable age living in the UK.

    EU citizens that have lived in the UK during their working lives and then retire here will have paid tax just like anyone else.

    Don’t go quoting facts at them they don’t like it.
  • Options
    Ave_itAve_it Posts: 2,411
    ClippP said:

    nichomar said:

    Ave_it said:

    Remember: if you vote LAB LD SNP or GRN you get hard left CORBYNISTA STURGEON government!

    Stop talking crap
    I have sometimes wondered, over the years, if Ave It isn`t in real life a certain ABDPJohnson.
    I've told that I look like him! And I do go to pubs in his constituency
  • Options
    kinabalukinabalu Posts: 39,226
    kinabalu said:

    IMO we get a Corbyn government if Lab + SNP is greater than Con + DUP.

    OK OK I will refine this.
    We definitely get PM Corbyn if Lab + SNP beats Con + DUP.
    But we could possibly get PM Corbyn so long as Lab are within about X of Con where X is about 50. Ish.
  • Options
    Ave_it said:

    ClippP said:

    nichomar said:

    Ave_it said:

    Remember: if you vote LAB LD SNP or GRN you get hard left CORBYNISTA STURGEON government!

    Stop talking crap
    I have sometimes wondered, over the years, if Ave It isn`t in real life a certain ABDPJohnson.
    I've told that I look like him! And I do go to pubs in his constituency
    And do you know how many kids you have?
  • Options
    wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 6,934
    speedy2 said:

    speedy2 said:

    speedy2 said:

    kinabalu said:

    IMO we get a Corbyn government if Lab + SNP is greater than Con + DUP.

    Not really, you probably get a Corbyn government if the total seats of CON+DUP is less than 323.
    No you dont. You get a Corbyn govt if Lab plus SNP plus PC plus Greens plus SDLP is greater than the rest
    I don't think the LD would vote against a Labour government especially after a weak result for them, or any of the small parties except the DUP and maybe the UUP due to the risk of a super squeeze in a February election.
    The LDs wont put Corbyn in number 10. Period. And if they have (say) 13 seats they will want another go asap, not ballsing it up under Swinson this time.
    In a February election I would expect all small parties to be super squeezed, the LD would not risk evaporation into thin air by having a repeat election, they could end up with 8 seats again or less.
    Nonsense. They will know labour are on the brink of financial ruin when the racism report comes out and in no position to fight another election and keen to capitalize. And they wont put Corbyn in number 10. They arent idiots.
  • Options
    brokenwheelbrokenwheel Posts: 3,352
    edited November 2019

    Lovely to see the Tories embracing bigotry, xenophobia and ignorance so wholeheartedly. One thing we do know: anyone who says they are voting Tory because of Labour anti-Semitism is not serious about combatting racism.
    https://twitter.com/mattholehouse/status/1200688354192437249?s=21

    That's not racism, and screaming racist like the boy who cried wolf is part of the reason we are where we are.

    People who oppose racism also oppose bigotry and xenophobia. If you’re happy to embrace the profound ignorance that sees the children of foreign born taxpayers labelled as a burden then you are not serious about combatting terrorism.

    Except what you quoted is none of the above, and trying to make out it is just convinces people to switch off to real racism such as is happening within the Left.
    But what really gets me is you seem to be trying to link anti-racism and combatting terrorism, which is shockingly naive. Remind me, how many Polish terrorists have we had? Chinese? Indian Hindus? Are you saying they've never experienced racism?

    Where did I mention terrorism?

    It is pure bigotry and xenophobia to imply that EU citizens are not taxpayers and that educating their children is a burden.
    Where did you mention terrorism? Erm, like the post I quoted above maybe? Helpfully I've bolded for you.
    As has already been mentioned below actually many of the EU citizens who would not be eligible to work in the UK assuming some points based system for are quite possibly not net taxpayers.
    If stating facts is now beyond the pale then we are in some Orwellian nightmare.
  • Options
    saddenedsaddened Posts: 2,245

    Lovely to see the Tories embracing bigotry, xenophobia and ignorance so wholeheartedly. One thing we do know: anyone who says they are voting Tory because of Labour anti-Semitism is not serious about combatting racism.
    https://twitter.com/mattholehouse/status/1200688354192437249?s=21

    Works a treat moving over formerly Labour supporters.
  • Options
    nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    speedy2 said:

    speedy2 said:

    speedy2 said:

    kinabalu said:

    IMO we get a Corbyn government if Lab + SNP is greater than Con + DUP.

    Not really, you probably get a Corbyn government if the total seats of CON+DUP is less than 323.
    No you dont. You get a Corbyn govt if Lab plus SNP plus PC plus Greens plus SDLP is greater than the rest
    I don't think the LD would vote against a Labour government especially after a weak result for them, or any of the small parties except the DUP and maybe the UUP due to the risk of a super squeeze in a February election.
    The LDs wont put Corbyn in number 10. Period. And if they have (say) 13 seats they will want another go asap, not ballsing it up under Swinson this time.
    In a February election I would expect all small parties to be super squeezed, the LD would not risk evaporation into thin air by having a repeat election, they could end up with 8 seats again or les.
    What happens when the extension runs out? Stop wetting yourselves blue team you will get your healthy majority and you know it and are trying to squeeze out the people who left you because you are deplorable back into the fold because your man is less deplorable than their man. Good positive campaign.
  • Options
    olmolm Posts: 125
    edited November 2019
    ydoethur said:

    olm said:

    Also it's of note that the numbers will be tighter for Tories, as the author pointed out, the DUP are not given to support Johnson. The DUP might abstain or vote against LAB and CON.
    Even if they voted against Corbyn,
    a) their numbers are likely to be no more than 8, rather than the previous 10
    b) Alliance and SDLP will likely have seats that come into play, on Corbyn's side (SDLP) or abstaining (Alliance?) (as opposed to the SF seats that are not in play).
    In a tight numbers game, that will be crucial.
    Additionally, the Lab rebels (and LD and Con) have largely been routed or departed...
    So as the author points out, a much cleaner party line when it comes to VONC and Brexit votes....

    The DUP have already said they will not help Corbyn into government.
    https://news.sky.com/story/general-election-dup-will-not-support-labour-under-jeremy-corbyn-11873951
    If therefore Johnson gets within 20-odd, Corbyn can’t form a government without the ACTIVE support of the Liberal Democrats, which I don’t think he will get.
    Try not to confuse wishful thinking with analysis.
    There was no wishful thinking there.

    I mistook the FTPA process (not least because it is not actually written in the Act or elsewhere, it is by convention, and it is not universally agreed, https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2019/08/28/what-happens-after-a-vote-of-no-confidence-in-the-pm-a-route-map/ but even there it accepts that it is a grey area in general)

    I suggest the DUP will win 6, at most 7 seats and SF 9.
    Which leaves 2 ALL and 1 SDLP. Maybe 1 UUP in South Antrim (or the 7th DUP seat).
    DUP will very likely lose: Belfast North, South and East.

    On that basis, (and with SNP getting 49, LD 4, IND 1 (E Devon?), GRN 1, PC 4)
    Then Con need 302 to block Corbyn minority [or 313 - if Lab gets active support of LD+ALL]

    Of course if LD get less, SNP more, or UUP take a seat from DUP, then the dynamics change significantly on a very few MP numbers...
  • Options

    There are three times as many UK citizens of pensionable age living in the EU27 as there are EU citizens of pensionable age living in the UK.

    EU citizens that have lived in the UK during their working lives and then retire here will have paid tax just like anyone else.

    Precisely my point!
    Pensions are paid by the country people worked in and paid taxes too. So if our citizens retire to Spain we still pay their pensions. If other nations citizens come to work here we will pay their pensions.
    The pensions must be paid due to the taxes that have been paid. So you can't ignore pensions because someone is young and working - as long as they are working they are accruing future pension and healthcare entitlements.
    Any cost benefit analysis of taxes and benefits should include future post retirement costs like end of life healthcare and pensions. Ignoring that is like ignoring interest payments.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,287
    olm said:

    ydoethur said:

    olm said:

    Also it's of note that the numbers will be tighter for Tories, as the author pointed out, the DUP are not given to support Johnson. The DUP might abstain or vote against LAB and CON.
    Even if they voted against Corbyn,
    a) their numbers are likely to be no more than 8, rather than the previous 10
    b) Alliance and SDLP will likely have seats that come into play, on Corbyn's side (SDLP) or abstaining (Alliance?) (as opposed to the SF seats that are not in play).
    In a tight numbers game, that will be crucial.
    Additionally, the Lab rebels (and LD and Con) have largely been routed or departed...
    So as the author points out, a much cleaner party line when it comes to VONC and Brexit votes....

    The DUP have already said they will not help Corbyn into government.
    https://news.sky.com/story/general-election-dup-will-not-support-labour-under-jeremy-corbyn-11873951
    If therefore Johnson gets within 20-odd, Corbyn can’t form a government without the ACTIVE support of the Liberal Democrats, which I don’t think he will get.
    Try not to confuse wishful thinking with analysis.
    There was no wishful thinking there.

    I mistook the FTPA process (not least because it is not actually written in the Act or elsewhere, it is by convention, and it is not universally agreed, https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2019/08/28/what-happens-after-a-vote-of-no-confidence-in-the-pm-a-route-map/

    I suggest the DUP will win 6, at most 7 seats and SF 9.
    Which leaves 2 ALL and 1 SDLP. Maybe 1 UUP in South Antrim (or the 7th DUP seat).
    They will very likely lose: Belfast North, South and East.

    On that basis, (and with SNP getting 49, LD 4, IND 1 (E Devon?), GRN 1, PC 4)
    Then Con need 302 to block Corbyn minority [or 313 - if Lab gets active support of LD+ALL]

    Of course if LD get less, SNP more, or UUP take a seat from DUP, then the dynamics change significantly on a very few MP number...
    The wishful thinking was the DUP might support Corbyn!
  • Options
    malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 41,995
    ydoethur said:

    olm said:

    Also it's of note that the numbers will be tighter for Tories, as the author pointed out, the DUP are not given to support Johnson. The DUP might abstain or vote against LAB and CON.
    Even if they voted against Corbyn,
    a) their numbers are likely to be no more than 8, rather than the previous 10
    b) Alliance and SDLP will likely have seats that come into play, on Corbyn's side (SDLP) or abstaining (Alliance?) (as opposed to the SF seats that are not in play).
    In a tight numbers game, that will be crucial.
    Additionally, the Lab rebels (and LD and Con) have largely been routed or departed...
    So as the author points out, a much cleaner party line when it comes to VONC and Brexit votes....

    The DUP have already said they will not help Corbyn into government.
    https://news.sky.com/story/general-election-dup-will-not-support-labour-under-jeremy-corbyn-11873951
    If therefore Johnson gets within 20-odd, Corbyn can’t form a government without the ACTIVE support of the Liberal Democrats, which I don’t think he will get.
    Try not to confuse wishful thinking with analysis.
    they are easily bought
  • Options
    camelcamel Posts: 815
    kinabalu said:

    kinabalu said:

    IMO we get a Corbyn government if Lab + SNP is greater than Con + DUP.

    OK OK I will refine this.
    We definitely get PM Corbyn if Lab + SNP beats Con + DUP.
    But we could possibly get PM Corbyn so long as Lab are within about X of Con where X is about 50. Ish.
    I believe there'll be a fully functioning government implementing a full queen's speech if Labour get 275 seats or if Cons get 325 seats. I believe the former is impossible with the tory share above 40%. The latter is impossible if the tory share falls below 40%.
    What time are these polls out?
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,287
    edited November 2019
    malcolmg said:

    ydoethur said:

    olm said:

    Also it's of note that the numbers will be tighter for Tories, as the author pointed out, the DUP are not given to support Johnson. The DUP might abstain or vote against LAB and CON.
    Even if they voted against Corbyn,
    a) their numbers are likely to be no more than 8, rather than the previous 10
    b) Alliance and SDLP will likely have seats that come into play, on Corbyn's side (SDLP) or abstaining (Alliance?) (as opposed to the SF seats that are not in play).
    In a tight numbers game, that will be crucial.
    Additionally, the Lab rebels (and LD and Con) have largely been routed or departed...
    So as the author points out, a much cleaner party line when it comes to VONC and Brexit votes....

    The DUP have already said they will not help Corbyn into government.
    https://news.sky.com/story/general-election-dup-will-not-support-labour-under-jeremy-corbyn-11873951
    If therefore Johnson gets within 20-odd, Corbyn can’t form a government without the ACTIVE support of the Liberal Democrats, which I don’t think he will get.
    Try not to confuse wishful thinking with analysis.
    they are easily bought
    Yes, but I wonder how easily they are sold. Explaining to their voters that they made a man who is a supporter of both the IRA and a United Ireland PM might be quite a tough sell.
    In any case, they have ruled it out with sufficient vigour I don’t think they could resile.
This discussion has been closed.