politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » As Johnson launches CON membership polling finds his backers m

kamski said:

Philip_Thompson said:

kamski said:

Sunil_Prasannan said:

kinabalu said:

kamski said:

One of the most depressing things about the possibility of Boris Johnson as PM is he is openly racist, sexist and homophobic. And doubly depressing that a lot of people don't seem to be that bothered by this.

take this not so well known example:
'In 2001, Johnson wrote in his book Friends, Voters, Countrymen that “if gay marriage was OK – and I was uncertain on the issue – then I saw no reason in principle why a union should not be consecrated between three men, as well as two men, or indeed three men and a dog”.'

from this list:
https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2019/06/boris-johnson-s-racist-insults-dog-whistles-and-slurs

Bit more than 'not bothered'. Approving. The Trump effect. Toxic. Potent. Pervasive. Insidious. Far-reaching.

https://twitter.com/mowords/status/1138757066242363393

It was NOT "Muslim Women" - it was "Muslim women wot wear the veil".

Either way, Johnson thinks it's ok for Johnson to tell ethnic minority women what to wear.

No. Johnson's point in the article was he was opposing bans that other nations like France and Sweden have passed.

But why let facts get in the way of your gesturing?

Here is a fact: Johnson wrote this:
"If a constituent came to my MP’s surgery with her face obscured, I should feel fully entitled – like Jack Straw – to ask her to remove it so that I could talk to her properly."
So doing exactly what I said - telling ethnic minority women what to wear.

and why use insulting language like "gesturing"?

No. What not to wear in his own surgery, not in public. Too right too.

If someone goes in wearing a balaclava and is asked to remove it would you be upset?

And I use gesturing as that is the correct word to use. If you find it insulting maybe stop gesturing and start adhering to facts?

Nigelb said:

Philip_Thompson said:

kamski said:

RoyalBlue said:

kamski said:

Sunil_Prasannan said:

kinabalu said:

kamski said:

One of the most depressing things about the possibility of Boris Johnson as PM is he is openly racist, sexist and homophobic. And doubly depressing that a lot of people don't seem to be that bothered by this.

take this not so well known example:
'In 2001, Johnson wrote in his book Friends, Voters, Countrymen that “if gay marriage was OK – and I was uncertain on the issue – then I saw no reason in principle why a union should not be consecrated between three men, as well as two men, or indeed three men and a dog”.'

from this list:
https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2019/06/boris-johnson-s-racist-insults-dog-whistles-and-slurs

Bit more than 'not bothered'. Approving. The Trump effect. Toxic. Potent. Pervasive. Insidious. Far-reaching.

https://twitter.com/mowords/status/1138757066242363393

It was NOT "Muslim Women" - it was "Muslim women wot wear the veil".

Either way, Johnson thinks it's ok for Johnson to tell ethnic minority women what to wear.

Who knew that Islam was an ethnicity?

Idiot.

here's a tip, to avoid making an "idiot" of yourself, try replacing the word "Islam" with the word "Judaism" or the world "muslims" with the word "jews" in any statement to see how it sounds, it should help you with your blindspot.

Indeed and just as it is offence to Muslims to suggest Islam demands women not be seen and be covered up from head to toe, it would be equally offensive to Jews to suggest Judaism demands it too...

Which might be a reasonable point to make if you didn't do so by describing people as 'letterboxes', and adding that's it's important to say what you mean.

They do look like letterboxes.

Mockery is a perfectly valid tool. We should mock misogynistic behaviour.

Philip_Thompson said:

Nigelb said:

Philip_Thompson said:

kamski said:

RoyalBlue said:

kamski said:

Sunil_Prasannan said:

kinabalu said:

kamski said:

One of the most depressing things about the possibility of Boris Johnson as PM is he is openly racist, sexist and homophobic. And doubly depressing that a lot of people don't seem to be that bothered by this.

take this not so well known example:
'In 2001, Johnson wrote in his book Friends, Voters, Countrymen that “if gay marriage was OK – and I was uncertain on the issue – then I saw no reason in principle why a union should not be consecrated between three men, as well as two men, or indeed three men and a dog”.'

from this list:
https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2019/06/boris-johnson-s-racist-insults-dog-whistles-and-slurs

Bit more than 'not bothered'. Approving. The Trump effect. Toxic. Potent. Pervasive. Insidious. Far-reaching.

https://twitter.com/mowords/status/1138757066242363393

It was NOT "Muslim Women" - it was "Muslim women wot wear the veil".

Either way, Johnson thinks it's ok for Johnson to tell ethnic minority women what to wear.

Who knew that Islam was an ethnicity?

Idiot.

here's a tip, to avoid making an "idiot" of yourself, try replacing the word "Islam" with the word "Judaism" or the world "muslims" with the word "jews" in any statement to see how it sounds, it should help you with your blindspot.

Indeed and just as it is offence to Muslims to suggest Islam demands women not be seen and be covered up from head to toe, it would be equally offensive to Jews to suggest Judaism demands it too...

Which might be a reasonable point to make if you didn't do so by describing people as 'letterboxes', and adding that's it's important to say what you mean.

They do look like letterboxes.

Mockery is a perfectly valid tool. We should mock misogynistic behaviour.

You are mocking the victims.

justin124 said:

It is not clear that a new PM always receives a significant Honeymoon boost - or that it lasts long. Macmillan was not riding high in early 1957 - neither was Douglas-Home at the end of 1963. Wilson become PM in mid- October 1964 yet lost the supposedly safe seat of Leyton to the Tories at a by election in January 1965. Callaghan took office at the beginning of April 1976 yet Labour did not fare particularly well at the May 1976 Local Elections - and was very unpopular by the Autumn. Johnson is much better known as a personality than his predecessors and will carry high expectations from his supporters. The potential for disappointment is likely to be very great.

Boris has a high ceiling and a low floor but he is the only Tory I can see who can win a majority against Corbyn so is worth the risk

OGH is having a flutter, or a rush of blood to the head. I'm deeply skeptical of the value on this bet, but time will tell.

https://twitter.com/MSmithsonPB/status/1138779173311406081

justin124 said:

It is not clear that a new PM always receives a significant Honeymoon boost - or that it lasts long. Macmillan was not riding high in early 1957 - neither was Douglas-Home at the end of 1963. Wilson become PM in mid- October 1964 yet lost the supposedly safe seat of Leyton to the Tories at a by election in January 1965. Callaghan took office at the beginning of April 1976 yet Labour did not fare particularly well at the May 1976 Local Elections - and was very unpopular by the Autumn. Johnson is much better known as a personality than his predecessors and will carry high expectations from his supporters. The potential for disappointment is likely to be very great.

He’ll get a honeymoon - as both May and Brown did - but his may not be even as long as theirs.

Nigelb said:

Philip_Thompson said:

Nigelb said:

Philip_Thompson said:

kamski said:

RoyalBlue said:

kamski said:

Sunil_Prasannan said:

kinabalu said:

kamski said:

One of the most depressing things about the possibility of Boris Johnson as PM is he is openly racist, sexist and homophobic. And doubly depressing that a lot of people don't seem to be that bothered by this.

take this not so well known example:
'In 2001, Johnson wrote in his book Friends, Voters, Countrymen that “if gay marriage was OK – and I was uncertain on the issue – then I saw no reason in principle why a union should not be consecrated between three men, as well as two men, or indeed three men and a dog”.'

from this list:
https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2019/06/boris-johnson-s-racist-insults-dog-whistles-and-slurs

Bit more than 'not bothered'. Approving. The Trump effect. Toxic. Potent. Pervasive. Insidious. Far-reaching.

https://twitter.com/mowords/status/1138757066242363393

It was NOT "Muslim Women" - it was "Muslim women wot wear the veil".

Either way, Johnson thinks it's ok for Johnson to tell ethnic minority women what to wear.

Who knew that Islam was an ethnicity?

Idiot.

here's a tip, to avoid making an "idiot" of yourself, try replacing the word "Islam" with the word "Judaism" or the world "muslims" with the word "jews" in any statement to see how it sounds, it should help you with your blindspot.

Indeed and just as it is offence to Muslims to suggest Islam demands women not be seen and be covered up from head to toe, it would be equally offensive to Jews to suggest Judaism demands it too...

Which might be a reasonable point to make if you didn't do so by describing people as 'letterboxes', and adding that's it's important to say what you mean.

They do look like letterboxes.

Mockery is a perfectly valid tool. We should mock misogynistic behaviour.

You are mocking the victims.

I'm mocking their oppression. What are you doing to oppose it?

Ishmael_Z said:

Philip_Thompson said:

Nigelb said:

Philip_Thompson said:

kamski said:

RoyalBlue said:

kamski said:

Sunil_Prasannan said:

kinabalu said:

kamski said:

One of the most depressing things about the possibility of Boris Johnson as PM is he is openly racist, sexist and homophobic. And doubly depressing that a lot of people don't seem to be that bothered by this.

take this not so well known example:
'In 2001, Johnson wrote in his book Friends, Voters, Countrymen that “if gay marriage was OK – and I was uncertain on the issue – then I saw no reason in principle why a union should not be consecrated between three men, as well as two men, or indeed three men and a dog”.'

from this list:
https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2019/06/boris-johnson-s-racist-insults-dog-whistles-and-slurs

Bit more than 'not bothered'. Approving. The Trump effect. Toxic. Potent. Pervasive. Insidious. Far-reaching.

https://twitter.com/mowords/status/1138757066242363393

It was NOT "Muslim Women" - it was "Muslim women wot wear the veil".

Either way, Johnson thinks it's ok for Johnson to tell ethnic minority women what to wear.

Who knew that Islam was an ethnicity?

Idiot.

here's a tip, to avoid making an "idiot" of yourself, try replacing the word "Islam" with the word "Judaism" or the world "muslims" with the word "jews" in any statement to see how it sounds, it should help you with your blindspot.

Indeed and just as it is offence to Muslims to suggest Islam demands women not be seen and be covered up from head to toe, it would be equally offensive to Jews to suggest Judaism demands it too...

Which might be a reasonable point to make if you didn't do so by describing people as 'letterboxes', and adding that's it's important to say what you mean.

They do look like letterboxes.

Mockery is a perfectly valid tool. We should mock misogynistic behaviour.

It really isn't, it is tiresome, rude and potentially frightening. and why mock the *victims* of misogyny? You and Boris are very welcome to find large groups of hard line male muslims and deploy your satirical skills against them. Unless you find that mocking women is somehow safer and more satisfying?

Frightening? Oh give over.

And the victims are more victimised by those who justify it as being appropriate for their ethnicity or appropriate for their religion than anyone else. It isnt appropriate and it shouldn't be normalised.

isam said:

Nigelb said:

isam said:

Nigelb said:

RoyalBlue said:

kamski said:

Sunil_Prasannan said:

kinabalu said:

kamski said:

One of the most depressing things about the possibility of Boris Johnson as PM is he is openly racist, sexist and homophobic. And doubly depressing that a lot of people don't seem to be that bothered by this.

take this not so well known example:
'In 2001, Johnson wrote in his book Friends, Voters, Countrymen that “if gay marriage was OK – and I was uncertain on the issue – then I saw no reason in principle why a union should not be consecrated between three men, as well as two men, or indeed three men and a dog”.'

from this list:
https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2019/06/boris-johnson-s-racist-insults-dog-whistles-and-slurs

Bit more than 'not bothered'. Approving. The Trump effect. Toxic. Potent. Pervasive. Insidious. Far-reaching.

https://twitter.com/mowords/status/1138757066242363393

It was NOT "Muslim Women" - it was "Muslim women wot wear the veil".

Either way, Johnson thinks it's ok for Johnson to tell ethnic minority women what to wear.

Who knew that Islam was an ethnicity?

Idiot.

Who knew it might be simple to elucidate the ethnic background of UK Muslims ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_the_United_Kingdom#/media/File:British_Muslims_Ethnic_groups.png

Idiot.

8 years ago.

I reckon the European (inc Turkish) Muslim % has gone up since then

Which alters RoyalBlue's idiocy how ?

I thought you were trying to prove that mocking Islam was being racist by showing a chart from 2011 of UK Muslims ethnicity being mainly non white?

No - I was calling him an idiot for calling kamski an idiot.
Are you saying he's now slightly less of an idiot ?

Philip_Thompson said:

Nigelb said:

Philip_Thompson said:

Nigelb said:

Philip_Thompson said:

kamski said:

RoyalBlue said:

kamski said:

Sunil_Prasannan said:

kinabalu said:

kamski said:

One of the most depressing things about the possibility of Boris Johnson as PM is he is openly racist, sexist and homophobic. And doubly depressing that a lot of people don't seem to be that bothered by this.

take this not so well known example:
'In 2001, Johnson wrote in his book Friends, Voters, Countrymen that “if gay marriage was OK – and I was uncertain on the issue – then I saw no reason in principle why a union should not be consecrated between three men, as well as two men, or indeed three men and a dog”.'

from this list:
https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2019/06/boris-johnson-s-racist-insults-dog-whistles-and-slurs

Bit more than 'not bothered'. Approving. The Trump effect. Toxic. Potent. Pervasive. Insidious. Far-reaching.

https://twitter.com/mowords/status/1138757066242363393

It was NOT "Muslim Women" - it was "Muslim women wot wear the veil".

Either way, Johnson thinks it's ok for Johnson to tell ethnic minority women what to wear.

Who knew that Islam was an ethnicity?

Idiot.

here's a tip, to avoid making an "idiot" of yourself, try replacing the word "Islam" with the word "Judaism" or the world "muslims" with the word "jews" in any statement to see how it sounds, it should help you with your blindspot.

Indeed and just as it is offence to Muslims to suggest Islam demands women not be seen and be covered up from head to toe, it would be equally offensive to Jews to suggest Judaism demands it too...

Which might be a reasonable point to make if you didn't do so by describing people as 'letterboxes', and adding that's it's important to say what you mean.

They do look like letterboxes.

Mockery is a perfectly valid tool. We should mock misogynistic behaviour.

You are mocking the victims.

I'm mocking their oppression. What are you doing to oppose it?

Yes, I'm sure that was entirely the point of Johnson's comment.

A clearly derogatory remark about someone you think the victim of oppression is not 'mocking oppression'.

justin124 said:

RochdalePioneers said:

Everyone take a few paces back from the detail of the leadership launch and examine the strategic position:
1. Brexit is the new political paradigm that defines all other issues / parties. Increasingly entrenched increasingly angry hate mobs on both sides
2. Leavers will not countenance any further delay. Whether the UK is ready or not, we must leave. And leave with no deal is the only proper leave
3. Leavers are predominantly Tory leaning. And will only vote Tory again if Leave really does mean Leave. Unless the Tories do this in the short term, Farage will obliterate them and make them irrelevant in the medium and long term
4. The parliamentary maths remain deadlocked - no support for deal, no deal, or remain. Yet the deadlock must be broken

Which explains the Boris stratagem. I want a deal, but we have to leave on Halloween. (then) I've spoken to these foreign jobbies and they won't budge so no deal it is. (then) These traitors and fools in Parliament want to block our future and imprison us here. I'm calling an election - vote Boris and we leave with no deal.

Thats it. Boris doesn't care about detail. Never has. And his audience of leavers don't care either (its all project fear). And unless he does this thing the Tories are toast. If it all goes wrong them may be toast, but may be is better than will be.

Boris as PM. Election in late October. A Tory win. Immediate No Deal and damn the consequences.

Did you expect the Peterborough result?

Nope - I called it for BXP. And if you look at the two variables you can see why they didn't win it and how PM Boris can win an election.

1. Accept the Leave / Remain paradigm has replaced Labour / Tory
2. Leave voters were broadly dumping the Tories in favour of Brexit. And a few hundred more switchers would have carried it for Brexit
3. Remain voters were broadly dumping Labour for noone/LD. And a few hundred more would have carried it for Brexit.
4. Brexit parties carried more than half the vote, but having split their vote ended up losing the seat
5. Imagine a PM Boris Tory pitch of "vote Tory on 24th and we leave the EU on the 31st". The leave switchers to Brexit all come home. The Lab switchers to Brexit go Tory. Thats enough votes to carry it for the Tories, almost regardless of what Labour do
6. Labour will be advocating a "we will block no deal on 31st" position - and lose leave voters. They will also be advocating a "we negotiate a new deal and leave the EU with that" - and lose remain voters.

If Boris goes straight to the country, he wins a majority, delivers Brexit and kills Labour

Recidivist said:

HYUFD said:

justin124 said:

It is not clear that a new PM always receives a significant Honeymoon boost - or that it lasts long. Macmillan was not riding high in early 1957 - neither was Douglas-Home at the end of 1963. Wilson become PM in mid- October 1964 yet lost the supposedly safe seat of Leyton to the Tories at a by election in January 1965. Callaghan took office at the beginning of April 1976 yet Labour did not fare particularly well at the May 1976 Local Elections - and was very unpopular by the Autumn. Johnson is much better known as a personality than his predecessors and will carry high expectations from his supporters. The potential for disappointment is likely to be very great.

Boris has a high ceiling and a low floor but he is the only Tory I can see who can win a majority against Corbyn so is worth the risk

It's worth the risk if and only if beating Corbyn is the most important goal of the Conservative Party project. It's not my party, so I'll defer to you on this. But I'd have thought there were bigger considerations - like keeping the party in one piece and not wrecking the economy for example.

The trouble with most of our politicians is that they would hugely prefer governing a wasteland to being the opposition in a flourishing land.

Sean Gabb is not a fan of Boris.

"Sean Gabb
1 hr ·

E-mail sent to my MP:
Dear Charlie,
I allow that you know these people better than I do. However, I have had dealings over the years with Boris Johnson, and am aware of the wider issues surrounding his character and abilities. Everything I know about him inclines me to the view that he is a lazy charlatan - a liar, an adulterer, a procurer of abortions of convenience, and a dangerously incompetent Foreign Secretary. He will not secure a decent exit from the European Union. He will not oversee a reconstruction of our politics. He will be murdered, come the next election, by Jeremy Corbyn. The only reward you will get from supporting him is the loss of your seat.
I urge you to consider giving support to Dominic Raab, who at least looks competent, and possibly is."

Nigel_Foremain said:

Philip_Thompson said:

Nigelb said:

Philip_Thompson said:

Nigelb said:

Philip_Thompson said:

kamski said:

RoyalBlue said:

kamski said:

Sunil_Prasannan said:

kinabalu said:

kamski said:

One of the most depressing things about the possibility of Boris Johnson as PM is he is openly racist, sexist and homophobic. And doubly depressing that a lot of people don't seem to be that bothered by this.

take this not so well known example:
'In 2001, Johnson wrote in his book Friends, Voters, Countrymen that “if gay marriage was OK – and I was uncertain on the issue – then I saw no reason in principle why a union should not be consecrated between three men, as well as two men, or indeed three men and a dog”.'

from this list:
https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2019/06/boris-johnson-s-racist-insults-dog-whistles-and-slurs

Bit more than 'not bothered'. Approving. The Trump effect. Toxic. Potent. Pervasive. Insidious. Far-reaching.

https://twitter.com/mowords/status/1138757066242363393

It was NOT "Muslim Women" - it was "Muslim women wot wear the veil".

Either way, Johnson thinks it's ok for Johnson to tell ethnic minority women what to wear.

Who knew that Islam was an ethnicity?

Idiot.

here's a tip, to avoid making an "idiot" of yourself, try replacing the word "Islam" with the word "Judaism" or the world "muslims" with the word "jews" in any statement to see how it sounds, it should help you with your blindspot.

Indeed and just as it is offence to Muslims to suggest Islam demands women not be seen and be covered up from head to toe, it would be equally offensive to Jews to suggest Judaism demands it too...

Which might be a reasonable point to make if you didn't do so by describing people as 'letterboxes', and adding that's it's important to say what you mean.

They do look like letterboxes.

Mockery is a perfectly valid tool. We should mock misogynistic behaviour.

You are mocking the victims.

I'm mocking their oppression. What are you doing to oppose it?

It is great you are back on here. With people like yourself commenting we do not need to remind people that most who voted Leave are ignorant and bigoted, because you do it for us. Well done, and thank you.

Those who denounce whole groups as "ignorant and bigoted" generally possess both faults in spades.

Philip_Thompson said:

Quincel said:

OGH is having a flutter, or a rush of blood to the head. I'm deeply skeptical of the value on this bet, but time will tell.

https://twitter.com/MSmithsonPB/status/1138779173311406081

Tory MPs must have a death wish if they go for Rory.

As I posted yesterday, Rory will surprise people with his first round score. Whether he is in the top two is a matter of opinion. I feel the second and third placed candidate will be between 60 and 80 each, it is possible that Rory could hit 2nd as many Remainer MPs in a secret ballot would like to flex their muscles - for the future.

https://twitter.com/nickeardleybbc/status/1138779436839555073

Sean_F said:

Nigel_Foremain said:

Philip_Thompson said:

Nigelb said:

Philip_Thompson said:

Nigelb said:

Philip_Thompson said:

kamski said:

RoyalBlue said:

kamski said:

Sunil_Prasannan said:

kinabalu said:

kamski said:

One of the most depressing things about the possibility of Boris Johnson as PM is he is openly racist, sexist and homophobic. And doubly depressing that a lot of people don't seem to be that bothered by this.

take this not so well known example:
'In 2001, Johnson wrote in his book Friends, Voters, Countrymen that “if gay marriage was OK – and I was uncertain on the issue – then I saw no reason in principle why a union should not be consecrated between three men, as well as two men, or indeed three men and a dog”.'

from this list:
https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2019/06/boris-johnson-s-racist-insults-dog-whistles-and-slurs

Bit more than 'not bothered'. Approving. The Trump effect. Toxic. Potent. Pervasive. Insidious. Far-reaching.

https://twitter.com/mowords/status/1138757066242363393

It was NOT "Muslim Women" - it was "Muslim women wot wear the veil".

Either way, Johnson thinks it's ok for Johnson to tell ethnic minority women what to wear.

Who knew that Islam was an ethnicity?

Idiot.

here's a tip, to avoid making an "idiot" of yourself, try replacing the word "Islam" with the word "Judaism" or the world "muslims" with the word "jews" in any statement to see how it sounds, it should help you with your blindspot.

Indeed and just as it is offence to Muslims to suggest Islam demands women not be seen and be covered up from head to toe, it would be equally offensive to Jews to suggest Judaism demands it too...

Which might be a reasonable point to make if you didn't do so by describing people as 'letterboxes', and adding that's it's important to say what you mean.

They do look like letterboxes.

Mockery is a perfectly valid tool. We should mock misogynistic behaviour.

You are mocking the victims.

I'm mocking their oppression. What are you doing to oppose it?

It is great you are back on here. With people like yourself commenting we do not need to remind people that most who voted Leave are ignorant and bigoted, because you do it for us. Well done, and thank you.

Those who denounce whole groups as "ignorant and bigoted" generally possess both faults in spades.

r/suicidebywords?

Sean_F said:

Sean Gabb is not a fan of Boris.

"I urge you to consider giving support to Dominic Raab, who at least looks competent, and possibly is."

I don't know who he is, but if he thinks Raab is the answer, it suggest the Tories are in dire straits.

Recidivist said:

I don't think you could predict the first round results even if you could waterboard every single Tory MP to find out who they intend to vote for.

You don't think it would be worth a try?

williamglenn said:

Recidivist said:

I don't think you could predict the first round results even if you could waterboard every single Tory MP to find out who they intend to vote for.

You don't think it would be worth a try?

Good point. (Though looking at the trouble Jo Brand is in, maybe not everyone will see the humour.)

I like Rory Stewart and I'm sure his style of polite, lyrical engagement is being well received.

But his chances of becoming Tory leader are zilch because even stupid Tories know that if he were their leader - in the current unpredictable Brexit climate - the party would be torn apart and would cease to exist in its current form.

As nice as he is there'd be no political sense to it.

MPs booing a journalist for asking a difficult question?

I remember the outrage when party members heckled journalists, though I can't remember now whether it was Labour or UKIP party members. Maybe both?

Anyway, that's a new low set today. Well done everyone.

Mr F, Not a whole group. I used the word "most". Mr Thompson said mockery is a perfectly valid tool. I find mockery of Brexit as very easy as it is the most fucking stupid venture anyone has ever supported. It is the philosophy of the moron, and 52% of the population took leave of their senses, though it doesn't necessarily mean they are all morons in other spheres of their lives. On that subject, and perhaps that alone, they should be mocked, and mocked continuously for their stupidity. Mr Thompson and his obsession with war should be at the front of the queue for this well deserved mockery. I fart in his general direction.

kinabalu said:

Philip_Thompson said:

Good! Honest answer!

The burka is not a racial thing either. A race is something you are born to and can not change. Nobody is born to a burka.

(i) "I dislike and disapprove of the full face covering but would not ban it. A ban would in my opinion be an unacceptable intrusion of the state into the right of an individual to dress how they please."

(ii) "No, I'm not in favour of banning the burka. That would be a step too far. But, heavens, don't they look ridiculous! I see women wearing them and all I can think of is bank robbers or letterboxes."

(i) is me.
(ii) is Johnson.

Same position.

But who sounds more like a prospective PM of the United Kingdom?

Quite.

Greetings, Rory! We have been expecting you...

Fenster said:

I like Rory Stewart and I'm sure his style of polite, lyrical engagement is being well received.

But his chances of becoming Tory leader are zilch because even stupid Tories know that if he were their leader - in the current unpredictable Brexit climate - the party would be torn apart and would cease to exist in its current form.

As nice as he is there'd be no political sense to it.

I agree. He is the best 25/1 lay that I have come across for quite some time. He has (literally) no chance of winning this contest.

Nigel_Foremain said:

Mr F, Not a whole group. I used the word "most". Mr Thompson said mockery is a perfectly valid tool. I find mockery of Brexit as very easy as it is the most fucking stupid venture anyone has ever supported. It is the philosophy of the moron, and 52% of the population took leave of their senses, though it doesn't necessarily mean they are all morons in other spheres of their lives. On that subject, and perhaps that alone, they should be mocked, and mocked continuously for their stupidity. Mr Thompson and his obsession with war should be at the front of the queue for this well deserved mockery. I fart in his general direction.

I object to your mockery and am going to cry myself to sleep after suffering your abuses.

Oh wait a second. No I'm not three years old and can live with your mockery. Carry on.

https://twitter.com/Steven_Swinford/status/1138784754885693441

”Basically, Boris might well be bonkers, but he isn't bonkers enough for many of his own supporters.”

https://t.co/Rg9omKbdNu

Stereotomy said:

You can get 1.1 odds that Boris either wins or fails to make the final 2. That seems like value- what scenario is there where he makes it past MPs but not members?

If you have some revelation that you think will knock Boris out of the race, and you are not a fellow Leaver like Raab, then the time to release it is when you are up against Boris in the final two.

If you release it earlier then another Leaver, like Raab, makes the final two and you still lose the members vote.

That's assuming there is anything that could knock Johnson out of the race.

isam said:

Quincel said:

OGH is having a flutter, or a rush of blood to the head. I'm deeply skeptical of the value on this bet, but time will tell.

https://twitter.com/MSmithsonPB/status/1138779173311406081

What do you make of the 2k at 1.49 wanting to back Hunt to make the final 2?

Too short to me, but being somewhat odds on is probably fair. The second spot looks highly likely to be him or Gove, with him as favourite. But uncertainty means I'd want close to evens at least.

IanB2 said:

The Financial Times NAILS (no, not SeanT) it: ”there is no political advantage in grasping reality if your voters don’t.

On day 1 that may be true. Life is longer than that, even the time in office of a PM should be in years not weeks. When voters find out in weeks that they have been lied to, what then?

Andy_Cooke said:

Philip_Thompson said:

Big_G_NorthWales said:

Philip_Thompson said:

Big_G_NorthWales said:

HYUFD said:

Good launch by Boris, made clear he still wants a Deal with the EU but unlike May will not take No Deal off the table and made clear the Tories must deliver Brexit Deal or No Deal

He was subdued, even nervous, and managed to be gaff free but has made impossible promises

What promise is impossible?

No deal on 31st October

Not impossible, there are multiple paths to it happening. Just improbable as it stands.

Possible ways.

1: Boris three-line whips for No Deal making it a Confidence motion. Passes.
2: Boris calls an election for a mandate for it. Wins.
3: Boris find a way to avoid asking for an extension. Times out, default out.
4: Macron (or A N Other) vetoes an extension. Times out, default out.

How do you make something a confidence motion in the post-FTPA era?

You can’t.

Quincel said:

isam said:

Quincel said:

OGH is having a flutter, or a rush of blood to the head. I'm deeply skeptical of the value on this bet, but time will tell.

https://twitter.com/MSmithsonPB/status/1138779173311406081

What do you make of the 2k at 1.49 wanting to back Hunt to make the final 2?

Too short to me, but being somewhat odds on is probably fair. The second spot looks highly likely to be him or Gove, with him as favourite. But uncertainty means I'd want close to evens at least.

Someone has laid it all. I should probably had a bit before I posed the question

Philip_Thompson said:

Big_G_NorthWales said:

Philip_Thompson said:

Big_G_NorthWales said:

HYUFD said:

Good launch by Boris, made clear he still wants a Deal with the EU but unlike May will not take No Deal off the table and made clear the Tories must deliver Brexit Deal or No Deal

He was subdued, even nervous, and managed to be gaff free but has made impossible promises

What promise is impossible?

No deal on 31st October

Not impossible, there are multiple paths to it happening. Just improbable as it stands.

Possible ways.

1: Boris three-line whips for No Deal making it a Confidence motion. Passes.
2: Boris calls an election for a mandate for it. Wins.
3: Boris find a way to avoid asking for an extension. Times out, default out.
4: Macron (or A N Other) vetoes an extension. Times out, default out.

But:

1. Isn’t the way the FTPA actually works;
2. could easily return a parliament of MPs unwilling to do it, regardless of what the Tory manifesto said;
3. if Boris won’t, Parliament likely will;
4. there won’t be any veto. Especially so long as revoke or referendum remains in play.

isam said:

Quincel said:

isam said:

Quincel said:

OGH is having a flutter, or a rush of blood to the head. I'm deeply skeptical of the value on this bet, but time will tell.

https://twitter.com/MSmithsonPB/status/1138779173311406081

What do you make of the 2k at 1.49 wanting to back Hunt to make the final 2?

Too short to me, but being somewhat odds on is probably fair. The second spot looks highly likely to be him or Gove, with him as favourite. But uncertainty means I'd want close to evens at least.

Someone has laid it all. I should probably had a bit before I posed the question

ATM looks like Hunt v Johnson or Javid v Johnson to me

justin124 said:

RochdalePioneers said:

Labour vote share fell by 17%. Tories fell by 25%. The big rises were in the parties most leave and most remain. If people had things if more interest then logically they would have voted for it. I'm looking at not just this by-election, also at the Euros and the locals. Labour and Tory are increasingly disconnected and irrelevant from what voters are interested in.

But estimates suggest that Labour would have polled circa 22% in the EU elections in the Peterborough constituency. Last week the party managed 31% - which is a fair jump in two weeks. In the context of a GE campaign and a likely turnout of 65% - 70% , I could see Labour polling circa 40% there. Ditto for the Tories.

I very much hope you are right and I am wrong. The Euros are not the marker for what happens in a general election. But they do indicate what switching is possible. Labour absolutely will win some people back, especially vs a populist Tory.

The difference between 22% and 31% in PBoro is turnout - people could be persuaded to come out for a by-election who stayed home in the Euro. And in that particular seat perhaps we do better with less switching away and more people holding their nose.

Which won't matter a jot if the Tories go for no deal with a populist. BXP + Tory is more than enough to win the seat regardless of Labour. If Johnson sets out a clear stall - vote for me and get Brexit next week - that sweeps up all the right / leave votes and with it the keys to Downing Street.

Corbyn was popular in 2017 having sucked in the young and the optimistic. Who have now seen the man behind the curtain and have gone back to the Greens / LibDems. He won't get anywhere near that height in 2019.

IanB2 said:

Philip_Thompson said:

Big_G_NorthWales said:

Philip_Thompson said:

Big_G_NorthWales said:

HYUFD said:

Good launch by Boris, made clear he still wants a Deal with the EU but unlike May will not take No Deal off the table and made clear the Tories must deliver Brexit Deal or No Deal

He was subdued, even nervous, and managed to be gaff free but has made impossible promises

What promise is impossible?

No deal on 31st October

Not impossible, there are multiple paths to it happening. Just improbable as it stands.

Possible ways.

1: Boris three-line whips for No Deal making it a Confidence motion. Passes.
2: Boris calls an election for a mandate for it. Wins.
3: Boris find a way to avoid asking for an extension. Times out, default out.
4: Macron (or A N Other) vetoes an extension. Times out, default out.

But:

1. Isn’t the way the FTPA actually works;
2. could easily return a parliament of MPs unwilling to do it, regardless of what the Tory manifesto said;
3. if Boris won’t, Parliament likely will;
4. there won’t be any veto. Especially so long as revoke or referendum remains in play.

1 can be. May has already shown FTPA can be got around by calling an early election (since opposition is honour bound to back the call and government MPs are whipped to do so). So call it a Confidence motion, making it clear that if the vote fails you will subsequently call an early election with the whip removed from any rebels.
2: Could do. Said possibilities not certainty.
3: See my subsequent post. Parliament can tell Boris to request it but what happens then is out of there hands.
4: Boris could try and provoke a veto. Revoke comes into play most if there is a veto.

Philip_Thompson said:

Nigel_Foremain said:

Mr F, Not a whole group. I used the word "most". Mr Thompson said mockery is a perfectly valid tool. I find mockery of Brexit as very easy as it is the most fucking stupid venture anyone has ever supported. It is the philosophy of the moron, and 52% of the population took leave of their senses, though it doesn't necessarily mean they are all morons in other spheres of their lives. On that subject, and perhaps that alone, they should be mocked, and mocked continuously for their stupidity. Mr Thompson and his obsession with war should be at the front of the queue for this well deserved mockery. I fart in his general direction.

I object to your mockery and am going to cry myself to sleep after suffering your abuses.

Oh wait a second. No I'm not three years old and can live with your mockery. Carry on.

You aren’t?

kinabalu said:

Fenster said:

I like Rory Stewart and I'm sure his style of polite, lyrical engagement is being well received.

But his chances of becoming Tory leader are zilch because even stupid Tories know that if he were their leader - in the current unpredictable Brexit climate - the party would be torn apart and would cease to exist in its current form.

As nice as he is there'd be no political sense to it.

I agree. He is the best 25/1 lay that I have come across for quite some time. He has (literally) no chance of winning this contest.

A 'no hoper'. Wasn't Corbyn one of them?

Sunil_Prasannan said:

Greetings, Rory! We have been expecting you...

Philip_Thompson said:

If the PM wants to leave and is prepared to leave without a deal, I fail to see how Parliament can stop it unless it is prepared to bring the PM down or revoke Article 50 unilaterally.

Let us imagine that Boris tries to renegotiate the backstop but fails, so he wants to no deal but Parliament in mid-to-late October votes to demand the PM negotiates an extension. That must be done at European Council as happened last time.

Let us imagine the PM then says something along the lines of the following.

Dear Mr Juncker,

Although Article 50 ends on 31 October and we are prepared to leave on 31 October, Parliament has required I write to you to request an extension. I do not believe you are negotiating in good faith by refusing to renegotiate the backstop, so I pledge to use that extra time to act accordingly. We will veto any European laws we can veto, vote against any bills that we can vote on, and continue to demand the agreement is renegotiated to our satisfaction. Please grant us an extension.

Regards,
PM Boris Johnson

What does Macron do then? How does Parliament stop Boris from extracting a veto from Macron?

The obvious solution is that the EU grants a two week extension so parliament can replace the prime minister.

logical_song said:

kinabalu said:

Fenster said:

I like Rory Stewart and I'm sure his style of polite, lyrical engagement is being well received.

But his chances of becoming Tory leader are zilch because even stupid Tories know that if he were their leader - in the current unpredictable Brexit climate - the party would be torn apart and would cease to exist in its current form.

As nice as he is there'd be no political sense to it.

I agree. He is the best 25/1 lay that I have come across for quite some time. He has (literally) no chance of winning this contest.

A 'no hoper'. Wasn't Corbyn one of them?

Different rules. Rory needs something big to change in the next 7 days or he's out. 7 days before the members ballot Corbyn wasn't a no hoper.

AlastairMeeks said:

I look forward to all the rebuttals from the death cult:

https://twitter.com/PickardJE/status/1138747518047674368

6 to 8 months to prepare and we have had over 30 months come Halloween. Do the maths.

Good afternoon, everyone.

IanB2 said:

Foxy said:

Philip_Thompson said:

Nigelb said:

Philip_Thompson said:

kamski said:

RoyalBlue said:

kamski said:

Sunil_Prasannan said:

kinabalu said:

kamski said:

One of the most depressing things about the possibility of Boris Johnson as PM is he is openly racist, sexist and homophobic. And doubly depressing that a lot of people don't seem to be that bothered by this.

take this not so well known example:
'In 2001, Johnson wrote in his book Friends, Voters, Countrymen that “if gay marriage was OK – and I was uncertain on the issue – then I saw no reason in principle why a union should not be consecrated between three men, as well as two men, or indeed three men and a dog”.'

from this list:
https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2019/06/boris-johnson-s-racist-insults-dog-whistles-and-slurs

Bit more than 'not bothered'. Approving. The Trump effect. Toxic. Potent. Pervasive. Insidious. Far-reaching.

https://twitter.com/mowords/status/1138757066242363393

It was NOT "Muslim Women" - it was "Muslim women wot wear the veil".

Either way, Johnson thinks it's ok for Johnson to tell ethnic minority women what to wear.

Who knew that Islam was an ethnicity?

Idiot.

here's a tip, to avoid making an "idiot" of yourself, try replacing the word "Islam" with the word "Judaism" or the world "muslims" with the word "jews" in any statement to see how it sounds, it should help you with your blindspot.

Indeed and just as it is offence to Muslims to suggest Islam demands women not be seen and be covered up from head to toe, it would be equally offensive to Jews to suggest Judaism demands it too...

Which might be a reasonable point to make if you didn't do so by describing people as 'letterboxes', and adding that's it's important to say what you mean.

They do look like letterboxes.

Mockery is a perfectly valid tool. We should mock misogynistic behaviour.

Strange letterboxes in your part of the world. In England ours are red and cylindrical.

Poor show, Foxy. Postbox v Letterbox.

So Muslim women look like doors?!?

Philip_Thompson said:

Gallowgate said:

Viceroy_of_Orange said:

Britain isn't a confederation.

We don't have a coalition government *just because* one part of the country voted for a different party. The same applies to UK referendum results.

So it's the "will of the province" when it suits you and then an imperialistic land grab when it also suits?

No. The province can choose to leave the UK at will or remain in the UK at will.

The province can also elect representatives to Parliamentary bodies that shape its laws and make decisions. Except it can't if the backstop goes through, then it will be a colony.

FPT

Just to understand your issues with the back stop:

1. The legitimacy of NI being subject to regulations they have no input in shaping
2. The concern about some form of regulatory checks between GB and NI

Both are reasonable and valid concerns. Couldn’t they be resolved by:

1. Allowing NI to elect MEPs while the backstop is in force*
2. Asking the people of NI to choose between No Deal & a hard border and Deal with limited checks between them and GB? **

* arguably GB should also elect MEPs while the U.K.-wide backstop is in force

** NB this is a recognition of the unique circumstances of NI and not a concession on a U.K.-wide second referendum so don’t waste OGH’s server storage

Philip_Thompson said:

williamglenn said:

Philip_Thompson said:

Andy_Cooke said:

Philip_Thompson said:

Big_G_NorthWales said:

Philip_Thompson said:

Big_G_NorthWales said:

HYUFD said:

Good launch by Boris, made clear he still wants a Deal with the EU but unlike May will not take No Deal off the table and made clear the Tories must deliver Brexit Deal or No Deal

He was subdued, even nervous, and managed to be gaff free but has made impossible promises

What promise is impossible?

No deal on 31st October

Not impossible, there are multiple paths to it happening. Just improbable as it stands.

Possible ways.

1: Boris three-line whips for No Deal making it a Confidence motion. Passes.
2: Boris calls an election for a mandate for it. Wins.
3: Boris find a way to avoid asking for an extension. Times out, default out.
4: Macron (or A N Other) vetoes an extension. Times out, default out.

How do you make something a confidence motion in the post-FTPA era?

Say that you are viewing this as a matter of confidence and if the vote fails you are tabling an early election motion the next day and will whip the party to vote in favour of the early election. Whip will be removed from anyone who rebels in either vote.

The election motion requites a 2/3 majority so that would be a completely pointless manoeuvre.

Corbyn would whip in favour, any Labour MPs who broke that whip would have their whip removed.

SNP and DUP probably opposed but its moot.

434 = 2/3rds of 650 (even not taking into account speakers and Sinn Fein).

Tory and Labour alone have 560

Why would Labour whip in favour of an immediate election. This is one of the few times when it would be politically and electorally better to ensure a November election and there would be plausible reasons to do so - for the entertainment of watching Boris fail to deliver on October 31st if nothing else...