politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » How the votes moved to UKIP and how they’ve moved away with CO
Comments
-
OK. So Fisher got it right then. 450 overall. How does that square with the BBC / Sky / Thrasher GE 2017 projections ? I am puzzled.SeanT said:
Yes, and my figures are also for England only. The Tories have gained 306 in ENGLAND ONLYsurbiton said:
The 115 , I believe, was for England only.SeanT said:A reminder of the Rallings Thrasher predictions:
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/apr/25/labour-predicted-to-lose-hundreds-of-seats-in-local-elections
"They forecast nets gains of 115 seats for the Tories and 85 for the Lib Dems, and net losses of 75 for Labour and 105 for Ukip."
Good guess on UKIP, but whoah elsewhere
Tories have SO FAR gained 306, the LDs are DOWN by 22, and Labour have lost 141. So far.
So in terms of seats the Tories are doing almost three times better than expected, Labour almost twice as bad.
Are the Tories winning big in their own areas ?0 -
Candidates on the stage in WM.0
-
Street's done it!0
-
Well done for showing face on this difficult day. Understandably you sound deflated and off colour.Theuniondivvie said:
Thank goodness your drear leader didn't frame the 'No to a second referendum' local elections purely on the basis of votes for the Scottish Conservative and Unionist party.DavidL said:Unionists in Scotland currently 250 + 198 + 67 = 515
Indys 350+ 12 = 362.
Smug.0 -
If you accept the national % are the floor for Tories and ceiling for Labour, then using them for the extrapolation is labour's best case outcome...surbiton said:
OK. So Fisher got it right then. 450 overall. How does that square with the BBC / Sky / Thrasher GE 2017 projections ? I am puzzled.SeanT said:
Yes, and my figures are also for England only. The Tories have gained 306 in ENGLAND ONLYsurbiton said:
The 115 , I believe, was for England only.SeanT said:A reminder of the Rallings Thrasher predictions:
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/apr/25/labour-predicted-to-lose-hundreds-of-seats-in-local-elections
"They forecast nets gains of 115 seats for the Tories and 85 for the Lib Dems, and net losses of 75 for Labour and 105 for Ukip."
Good guess on UKIP, but whoah elsewhere
Tories have SO FAR gained 306, the LDs are DOWN by 22, and Labour have lost 141. So far.
So in terms of seats the Tories are doing almost three times better than expected, Labour almost twice as bad.
Are the Tories winning big in their own areas ?0 -
STREET wins.0
-
ANDY STREET!!!!0
-
The gentleman from @NCPolitics speaks...
Matt Singh @MattSingh_
1/ This whole "It's not Labour doing badly, it's the Tories gaining seats because of the UKIP collapse" spin is totally missing the point.
2/ UKIP took votes almost equally from Labour and Tories from 2010-15. Polls said otherwise, but that's one the areas where they were wrong.
3/ I illustrated that here. And if you consider pre-2010 voting, UKIP very likely took more from Labour
4/ So if UKIP implodes, standing still is not neutral. Standing still is a disaster.
5/ Just as importantly, these are the sorts of people whose votes Labour needs if it wants to govern, but has been haemorrhaging since 2005.
6/ Of course, all of this is being viewed through the prism of Brexit. But the roots of it are far deeper.
7/ Ultimately, a broad church of the centre-left has to include socially conservative votes as well as socially liberal ones.
8/8 Which is why Labour's weakness is partly structural - it isn't solely down to the direction the party has taken since 2015.0 -
Philip_Thompson said:
Street's done it!
OMG
0 -
Streets ahead in West Mids!
0 -
100+ majority nailed on!0
-
I'll be voting Conservative in this election.stjohn said:
SeanF. I'm guessing when you say "they" in reference to the Tories, rather than "we", it indicates you are still with UKIP?Sean_F said:
They can win a 140 seat majority without big cities. They just need the medium-sized cities and big towns, on top of their safe seats.surbiton said:
Corbyn is not my guy, you know that. Unfortunately, the Tories couldn't provide the killer blow. If Simon wins in West Midlands, that shows the Tories cannot win big cities.SeanT said:
I reckon they'll get a few more than thatsurbiton said:
True. Enough to take 2 seats away from the SNP in the GE.SeanT said:Phenomenal performance by the SCONES
https://twitter.com/UKGenElect/status/860510031049097216
And you guys are in THIRD. lol. And you lost GLASGOW.
Remember when Corbyn was going to "win back Scotland"?
CHORTLE
It is Farron you should worry about now.0 -
surbiton
'It is Farron you should worry about now.'
Just seen Farron complete with winning here placards on TV, has anyone told him he's lost 30 seats so far ?
The Robert Hayward forecast was Lib Dems + 100 seats.
0 -
Street Wins
Birmingham
Siôn Simon 10382
Andy Street 7690
Total rejected at the second stage 29880 -
The power of the Curse remains strong.
Oh well.0 -
Andy Street....
KERCHING!
(and phew!)0 -
Today's result is a swing of 10% from Labour to Conservative, consistent with a national lead of almost 20%.AndyJS said:At last year's local elections the shares in the West Midlands were Lab 47%, Con 28%.
http://labourlist.org/2017/05/local-elections-liveblog/0 -
Finally, a chance for the PB Yoons to say 'I agree with John'.
https://twitter.com/KirstyStricklan/status/8605196397214187520 -
Birmingham should change that .dixiedean said:
Does the very big vote share for Burnham affect the projected vote share? No one could seriously contemplate Labour getting 62% in Gtr Mcr at a General Election. Given it has the biggest population voting yesterday, does this seriously skew the figures?justin124 said:
I suspect the forecast to be a bit too clinical , but it is worth remembering that the change from May 2015 is a lot less dramatic than from May 2013 when these seats were last fought. The number of council seats changing hands would be far smaller were we able to use a May 2015 baseline. Beyond that the seats in Scotland and Wales were last fought in May 2012 - which was easily Labour's best year in the last Parliament.TudorRose said:
It is puzzling; the Sky forecast is consistent with the BBC projected vote share. But neither tally with the opinion polls or recent results in, for example, Copeland.surbiton said:
The polling companies are going to do more methodological changes. How do they square the above with the polls ?AndyJS said:Sky forecast: Con maj of 48 seats if people voted the same way in GE as locals.
0 -
Street 238,628 combined
Simon 234,862 combined0 -
WM Mayor: Combined vote:
Andy Street: 1st 216,280 2nd 22,348 Total: 238,628
Sion Simon: 1st 210,259 2nd 24,603 Total: 234,862
Conservative victory0 -
Corbyn losing where never thought possible...0
-
Tories win WM mayor. Amazing.0
-
Sion Simon looks like he's about to cry. My heart goes out to him, not.0
-
Sensational!Philip_Thompson said:Street's done it!
0 -
Street0
-
Kin hells bells.
I said last week if Andy Street wins Mrs May is on course for a majority of 150 plus0 -
Easy Street!!0
-
Street a big, big win for the West Midlands.0
-
another tick in the win box today...
so over to you Poch.0 -
Andy Street Yes0
-
Labour needed a big hitter candidate. An MEP didn't cut it.0
-
A fair point but I am way more of a Unionist than I am a Tory. So I am quite content to put my own spin.Theuniondivvie said:
Thank goodness your drear leader didn't frame the 'No to a second referendum' local elections purely on the basis of votes for the Scottish Conservative and Unionist party.DavidL said:Unionists in Scotland currently 250 + 198 + 67 = 515
Indys 350+ 12 = 362.
Smug.0 -
0
-
The higher turnout in Solihull did it for him.Black_Rook said:WM Mayor: Combined vote:
Andy Street: 1st 216,280 2nd 22,348 Total: 238,628
Sion Simon: 1st 210,259 2nd 24,603 Total: 234,862
Conservative victory0 -
Can I be the first to sayTheScreamingEagles said:Kin hells bells.
I said last week if Andy Street wins Mrs May is on course for a majority of 150 plus
"Shortly there will be an election, in which the Tories will increase their majority."0 -
Barry Gardiner must be feeling like a total prat now after calling if for Simon on Sky News. Burnham's result in Manchester won't hide this catastrophe for Labour.0
-
Is that team Blue’s first or second Mayoralty win? – Hard to follow for us part timers.0
-
What was that Barry Gardiner was saying LOL0
-
Andy Street: "Rebirth of a new urban Conservative agenda"0
-
Hmm. I agree in general, but personally I think some of Street's win is about him as a person, rather than Tory vote: ex John Lewis, obviously got ideas etc etc. Could run a city - he's run a business etc.TheScreamingEagles said:Kin hells bells.
I said last week if Andy Street wins Mrs May is on course for a majority of 150 plus0 -
Fantastic WM result that the Tories could not have dreamed of weeks ago.0
-
Mr. Eagles, that's Fourth Crusade territory (150 seat majority).0
-
West of EnglandSimonStClare said:Is that team Blue’s first or second Mayoralty win? – Hard to follow for us part timers.
Teeside
West Midlands0 -
Won by A Street!0
-
Arf!TheWhiteRabbit said:
Can I be the first to sayTheScreamingEagles said:Kin hells bells.
I said last week if Andy Street wins Mrs May is on course for a majority of 150 plus
"Shortly there will be an election, in which the Tories will increase their majority."0 -
ThirdSimonStClare said:Is that team Blue’s first or second Mayoralty win? – Hard to follow for us part timers.
0 -
Street was the 2/5 favourite weeks agoBob__Sykes said:Fantastic WM result that the Tories could not have dreamed of weeks ago.
0 -
My first ever bet was on Street to win, a tiny £1 stake but i am chuffed.0
-
*cough cough* ;-)RobinWiggs said:0 -
LOL
wee Mrs McTurnip looking pressured0 -
Awesome news for the West Midlands, exactly the sort of person we should be encouraging into politics. Well done to Andy and all that worked to get him elected over the past six months.0
-
Not a bad set of results for the Tories then, all told.Black_Rook said:WM Mayor: Combined vote:
Andy Street: 1st 216,280 2nd 22,348 Total: 238,628
Sion Simon: 1st 210,259 2nd 24,603 Total: 234,862
Conservative victory0 -
Considering that there was no chance of letting Corbyn in this election and the Tories have surged in almost everywhere bar Labour ground zeros (Manc., Liverpool, Valleys) I can't imagine how this realistically could have gone much worse for Labour. As a holder of £20 on LDs to be 0-9 at the GE at 10-1 I'm also feeling quite hopeful.0
-
The Conservatives carrying the West Midlands and Teesside are reminiscent of their results in 1976-78, but those were achieved in mid-term by an Opposition, not by the government.0
-
See Faisal Islam has not tweeted - must be in despairBob__Sykes said:Fantastic WM result that the Tories could not have dreamed of weeks ago.
0 -
Just to put Andy Street's performance into context
https://twitter.com/JohnRentoul/status/8601220769837752330 -
And up against exactly the person who shouldn't be.Sandpit said:Awesome news for the West Midlands, exactly the sort of person we should be encouraging into politics. Well done to Andy and all that worked to get him elected over the past six months.
0 -
Close:Black_Rook said:WM Mayor: Combined vote:
Andy Street: 1st 216,280 2nd 22,348 Total: 238,628
Sion Simon: 1st 210,259 2nd 24,603 Total: 234,862
Conservative victory
Andy 50.4%
Sion 49.6%
(They're Mayors - so they have to be known by their 1st names...)
0 -
And to be fair to him, his name and background probably made the difference.Big_G_NorthWales said:Andy Street Yes
0 -
I got like 1.7 a couple of weeks ago, I don't think 2/5 is right.Artist said:
Street was the 2/5 favourite weeks agoBob__Sykes said:Fantastic WM result that the Tories could not have dreamed of weeks ago.
0 -
+ a million quid.rottenborough said:
Hmm. I agree in general, but personally I think some of Street's win is about him as a person, rather than Tory vote: ex John Lewis, obviously got ideas etc etc. Could run a city - he's run a business etc.TheScreamingEagles said:Kin hells bells.
I said last week if Andy Street wins Mrs May is on course for a majority of 150 plus
He's a decent candidate though. I'll give him his due.
But let's not pretend it wasn't the million quid wot won it for him.
0 -
52% in WM voted Lab, LD, Green, Comm in the first round. Same sort of thing as Bristol.0
-
Good on Andy Streets. Well deserved.
So much for most of these metro mayoralties going to Labour!0 -
It was the million quid, David.david_herdson said:
And to be fair to him, his name and background probably made the difference.Big_G_NorthWales said:Andy Street Yes
0 -
It is thanks to George Osborne and his plans for Metro Mayors we get another opportunity to laugh at Sion Simon.0
-
You jest Sir. - Hopefully Sion Simon will now disappear and stop blighting the body politic.RobD said:
ThirdSimonStClare said:Is that team Blue’s first or second Mayoralty win? – Hard to follow for us part timers.
0 -
Scotland (30 of 32 councils):david_herdson said:
Not a bad set of results for the Tories then, all told.Black_Rook said:WM Mayor: Combined vote:
Andy Street: 1st 216,280 2nd 22,348 Total: 238,628
Sion Simon: 1st 210,259 2nd 24,603 Total: 234,862
Conservative victory
SNP 383 (-14)
Con 260 (+152)
Lab 230 (-115)
Ind 164 (-23)
LibDem 67 (-2)
Green 12 (+2)0 -
I like the Guardian front page headline - "Andy Burnham elected Manchester Mayor....
... but Labour suffers heavy losses".0 -
LD seat change slowly clawing back towards overall break even.0
-
The mayoral elections are the perfect illustration of the toxicity of Corbyn Labour. In all three that went to a second round Labour did not get enough transfers from LibDems and Greens to get over the line.0
-
I think this should be posted for no particular reason...
http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/conference/2007/09/labour-majority-increase0 -
And Tees Valley, no?AndyJS said:52% in WM voted Lab, LD, Green, Comm in the first round. Same sort of thing as Bristol.
0 -
-
-
Labour have gone from 49.8 to 49.6?TheScreamingEagles said:Just to put Andy Street's performance into context
https://twitter.com/JohnRentoul/status/8601220769837752330 -
Paul WaughVERIFIED ACCOUNT @paulwaugh 2 mins2 minutes ago
I'm told Sion Simon will have a punchy speech
popcorn time.0 -
Did Sion Simon not bother campaigning, then? Purely a word of mouth thing, was it?Pong said:
+ a million quid.rottenborough said:
Hmm. I agree in general, but personally I think some of Street's win is about him as a person, rather than Tory vote: ex John Lewis, obviously got ideas etc etc. Could run a city - he's run a business etc.TheScreamingEagles said:Kin hells bells.
I said last week if Andy Street wins Mrs May is on course for a majority of 150 plus
He's a decent candidate though. I'll give him his due.
But let's not pretend it wasn't the million quid wot won it for him.0 -
While it's an article of faith for some that Ruth Davidson's grin is fake, it looks quite convincing to me today.Black_Rook said:
Scotland (30 of 32 councils):david_herdson said:
Not a bad set of results for the Tories then, all told.Black_Rook said:WM Mayor: Combined vote:
Andy Street: 1st 216,280 2nd 22,348 Total: 238,628
Sion Simon: 1st 210,259 2nd 24,603 Total: 234,862
Conservative victory
SNP 383 (-14)
Con 260 (+152)
Lab 230 (-115)
Ind 164 (-23)
LibDem 67 (-2)
Green 12 (+2)
0 -
The result in Scotland could certainly have been worse.Chameleon said:Considering that there was no chance of letting Corbyn in this election and the Tories have surged in almost everywhere bar Labour ground zeros (Manc., Liverpool, Valleys) I can't imagine how this realistically could have gone much worse for Labour. As a holder of £20 on LDs to be 0-9 at the GE at 10-1 I'm also feeling quite hopeful.
0 -
The idea that LD = Lab or "progressive" should be dead by now surely?AndyJS said:52% in WM voted Lab, LD, Green, Comm in the first round. Same sort of thing as Bristol.
Take Solihull. Street got 2,981 second preference votes many of which must have come from the Lib Dems if not Greens etc as there were only 1,833 UKIP first preference votes.0 -
As well as his famous "increase it's majority" article, we must take a moment to remember this gem.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yn4IpyVViw40 -
UKIP zero seats now 1/33 BF.
The 1/5 and better we could get up to this morning must be the safest bet for June 8th...0 -
No that was 49.9% in the first round not the second.PeterMannion said:
Labour have gone from 49.8 to 49.6?TheScreamingEagles said:Just to put Andy Street's performance into context
https://twitter.com/JohnRentoul/status/8601220769837752330 -
Its a big disappointment that Manchester never got as good a choice as Street.Bob__Sykes said:Fantastic WM result that the Tories could not have dreamed of weeks ago.
0 -
One reason why I think that the Con position is much stronger than polls show is because they aren't making progress in areas such as Oxfordshire where they can afford to take a hit on their majorities, therefore the swing is stronger in the midlands and NE. Oxfordshire should be a rock solid Con stronghold.
Personally I'm very happy that my RG unseated the incumbent Conservative to keep Oxon NOC.
Re: OW&Ab, the LDs won all three Abingdon wards and both of the wards between Abingdon & east Oxford. So far I've only seen LD posters as well in Abingdon. All this being said I reckon that Blackwood will hold on in OWAb.0 -
WEST MIDLANDS GE 2015:
Labour - 21 seats
Con - 7 seats
Amazing for Street to win given the above.0 -
Can I just express a moment's sympathy to the Labour candidate who managed to lose to UKIP. I mean to lose against a party that has lost every seat they held. Not a good day. Not good at all.0
-
LAB Hold Doncaster. I think that's the last result.0
-
People don't understand the system, so a lot of Green and LD second preferences will have gone to each other, and so not influenced the final count. Plus I expect many LDs don't currently see Corbyn's Labour as an acceptable second choice. Especially when the Tory was Mr John Lewis/Waitrose.SouthamObserver said:The mayoral elections are the perfect illustration of the toxicity of Corbyn Labour. In all three that went to a second round Labour did not get enough transfers from LibDems and Greens to get over the line.
0 -
At least Labour won Merthyr, that bastion of flint-eyed socialists and dilapidated housing estates where us Valley boys buy all our drugs.
Oh.0 -
Yes, I think 'Joe Bloggs Conservative' wouldn't have done anything like as well as the John Lewis Theresa May candidate.david_herdson said:
And to be fair to him, his name and background probably made the difference.Big_G_NorthWales said:Andy Street Yes
0 -
I'll be interested to see where and how the SNP seats were lost.0
-
Corbyn turned up in Liverpool - predictable - ranting as normal - zero hours contracts etc0
-
No point putting any spin on this, today has been a disaster for Labour.
Tory 120+ majority pretty much nailed on all things being equal.
Tory electoral fraud scandal only hope for Labour.0