politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Local By-Election Preview : June 9th 2016 (Referendum Day -
Comments
-
Farage's passport again...0
-
Benn doing better than in the Neil interview.
Eddy Izzard a complete disaster.0 -
Whisper it; Leave might be winning this.
Anyway up very early tomorrow to leaflet commuters. The battle goes on regardless.
Night all.0 -
Glad you agree about RidgeView,KentRising said:I can vouch for Ridgeview. Was a wine journalist in a former life and have visited the winery to see how their sparkling 'Merret' is made. The rosé sparkling in particular was a winner. The French don't like it up 'em.
Now, how does one go about getting a job as a wine journalist? Is it compulsory to go on about "subtle hints of forest fruits, but with a tang of peach and with a wonderful finish" and all that rubbish? Actually a better question, because I can write that sort of crap all day long, does it have to be accurate? Does anyone take any notice? Also do you get full expenses paid?
A wine journalist could be the ideal paying hobby for my declining years, as long as I didn't have to get on an aeroplane.0 -
Ipsos showing 45:55 will be good enough for me.rcs1000 said:
I'll believe it when phone polls start showing it as 50:50.MP_SE said:I am really struggling to believe this. I think it will be close like 52/48 Remain on a 60% turnout.
https://twitter.com/IainDale/status/7410295554781429770 -
I've been following it for years.Sunil_Prasannan said:
More details hereBenedictWhite said:
I just want to remind you that St Helena is British.Sunil_Prasannan said:
Not "they" - the British Government paid for the airport!rcs1000 said:
St Helena. GDP is about £10m. And they managed to spend £285m on an airport.MarkHopkins said:
£285 million pounds on an airport that can't open.
The German one? No.
Some EU nonsense? No.
It seems we're capable of screwing up all by ourselves...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/video_and_audio/headlines/36493860
That's quite an achievement. That would be like London spending £20trillion on an airport.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Helena_Airport
0 -
Farage doing a fact check in favour of "remain" effectively! arf., that Tele journo is poor but not quite as bad as Izzard.0
-
Avoid Sikh temples if you are a non-Sikh politician.John_N4 said:This kind of thing by Jeremy Corbyn is bound to win some votes for Leave:
http://i.imgur.com/TKkldpc.jpg
https://metrouk2.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/ad_166313250.jpg0 -
Mail Online comments make for interesting reading.John_N4 said:This kind of thing by Jeremy Corbyn is bound to win some votes for Leave:
http://i.imgur.com/TKkldpc.jpg0 -
To add to this, the only statistics I can find for 2015 (published last December) do not break down multilateral overseas development by organisation, one can only assume because it doesn't look great.Luckyguy1983 said:I've been doing a bit of research and found out (everyone else probably already knew this) that a percentage of Britain's DISTENDED overseas aid budget is called MULTILATERAL overseas development aid (as opposed to bilateral overseas development aid), and instead of being given to the needy, just gets bunged to big international organisations instead.
Guess what organisation takes the biggest cut of this multilateral overseas development aid? Correct - the European Commission. To be precise, in 2013, £813million to the European Commission, and £407million to the European Commission - European Development Fund. So that's well over a billion (I can't find 2015 figures, but international aid has gone up significantly since then) of British tax payers money going to the EU completely off the books. I suspect it's probably over £2 billion now, and potentially significant in this 'lying over the figures' debate.
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/403381/SID-2014-revised-UNDP-figure-feb15.pdf
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/512978/Provisional-UK-Official-Dev-Ass-Proportion-Gross-Nat-Income2015a.pdf
0 -
Ooops, you are quite right!Tim_B said:
No - the British TAXPAYER paid - the government didn't pay for anything, they have no money of their own.Sunil_Prasannan said:
Not "they" - the British Government paid for the airport!rcs1000 said:
St Helena. GDP is about £10m. And they managed to spend £285m on an airport.MarkHopkins said:
£285 million pounds on an airport that can't open.
The German one? No.
Some EU nonsense? No.
It seems we're capable of screwing up all by ourselves...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/video_and_audio/headlines/36493860
That's quite an achievement. That would be like London spending £20trillion on an airport.
"There is no such thing as "EU Money". There is only taxpayers' money!"0 -
Well done YC!YossariansChild said:Whisper it; Leave might be winning this.
Anyway up very early tomorrow to leaflet commuters. The battle goes on regardless.
Night all.
Did you see Gilmore had his best performance yet in Cali? #draftgilmore0 -
If IPSOS shows 45:55, we've likely lost . We need something closer to 50:50 given a lot of people will bottle it in the privacy of the polling booth.chestnut said:
Ipsos showing 45:55 will be good enough for me.rcs1000 said:
I'll believe it when phone polls start showing it as 50:50.MP_SE said:I am really struggling to believe this. I think it will be close like 52/48 Remain on a 60% turnout.
https://twitter.com/IainDale/status/7410295554781429770 -
The only peril of being a wine journalist is the nightmare scenario of James May being next to you with his whistle just in case you descend into wine-speak.HurstLlama said:
Glad you agree about RidgeView,KentRising said:I can vouch for Ridgeview. Was a wine journalist in a former life and have visited the winery to see how their sparkling 'Merret' is made. The rosé sparkling in particular was a winner. The French don't like it up 'em.
Now, how does one go about getting a job as a wine journalist? Is it compulsory to go on about "subtle hints of forest fruits, but with a tang of peach and with a wonderful finish" and all that rubbish? Actually a better question, because I can write that sort of crap all day long, does it have to be accurate? Does anyone take any notice? Also do you get full expenses paid?
A wine journalist could be the ideal paying hobby for my declining years, as long as I didn't have to get on an aeroplane.0 -
Eddie Izzard.... make it stop....0
-
In England maybe, in the UK as a whole less clearYossariansChild said:Whisper it; Leave might be winning this.
Anyway up very early tomorrow to leaflet commuters. The battle goes on regardless.
Night all.0 -
He is looking like Gillian Duffy's flighty, younger sister on a bad day.Danny565 said:Eddie Izzard.... make it stop....
0 -
"Yes it is." "No it isn't." "Yes it is." "No it isn't."
Genuinely one of the most substantial exchanges of the referendum so far.0 -
LOL!Danny565 said:"Yes it is." "No it isn't." "Yes it is." "No it isn't."
Genuinely one of the most substantial exchanges of the referendum so far.0 -
Mr Meeks threw a total hissy fit at just before 7am about something I said. He said no one cared what I thought as it was all vapid bilge.GIN1138 said:
And then we fell about laughing and a meme was born0 -
Tattooed lady keep your legs closed.0
-
Yes dear in Merrie Little England.HYUFD said:
In England maybe, in the UK as a whole less clearYossariansChild said:Whisper it; Leave might be winning this.
Anyway up very early tomorrow to leaflet commuters. The battle goes on regardless.
Night all.
'Smile at us, pay us, pass us; but do not quite forget;
For we are the people of (Little) England, that never have spoken yet.'
0 -
My latest forecast for the ref, result:
Remain 50.23% - Leave 49.77%.0 -
I have a conference in That London during the day, so I'll be training back home and should be home by 9pm. I'll be sampling the odds every 15mins until 4/5am, making sure to back up the websites before SPIN, PoliticalOdds.bet and Oddschecker withdraw the odds. I have the next day off so pick up my winnings circa noon.rcs1000 said:Two weeks today, I'm going to be eating a curry and drinking a pint. What about you guys?
0 -
Oddly enough under the last Labour government it was very easy to drill down to project and sub-project level, never mind country or even multilateral/bilateral level. In fact as government web sites go the DfID one under Gordon Brown was superbly informative.Luckyguy1983 said:
To add to this, the only statistics I can find for 2015 (published last December) do not break down multilateral overseas development by organisation, one can only assume because it doesn't look great.Luckyguy1983 said:I've been doing a bit of research and found out (everyone else probably already knew this) that a percentage of Britain's DISTENDED overseas aid budget is called MULTILATERAL overseas development aid (as opposed to bilateral overseas development aid), and instead of being given to the needy, just gets bunged to big international organisations instead.
Guess what organisation takes the biggest cut of this multilateral overseas development aid? Correct - the European Commission. To be precise, in 2013, £813million to the European Commission, and £407million to the European Commission - European Development Fund. So that's well over a billion (I can't find 2015 figures, but international aid has gone up significantly since then) of British tax payers money going to the EU completely off the books. I suspect it's probably over £2 billion now, and potentially significant in this 'lying over the figures' debate.
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/403381/SID-2014-revised-UNDP-figure-feb15.pdf
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/512978/Provisional-UK-Official-Dev-Ass-Proportion-Gross-Nat-Income2015a.pdf
It changed very quickly once Cameron and Clegg got in and implemented the silly 0.7% policy. I found it had become a sort of giant press release and actual detail was very difficult to find and when compared to Labour's offering, actually impossible.0 -
A statement that is never true...MP_SE said:
Mail Online comments make for interesting reading.John_N4 said:This kind of thing by Jeremy Corbyn is bound to win some votes for Leave:
http://i.imgur.com/TKkldpc.jpg0 -
Unfortunately I can't help you with that as I was writing about wine from the production end, as an agricultural commodity, rather than the consumption end. So it was the unsexy stuff like harvest tonnage of wine grapes and import/export of bulk and bottled, not sniffing, swilling and spitting the end product! My hunch though is that most of it doesn't have to be accurate, no, it's subjective and - largely - a lot of bollocks.HurstLlama said:
Glad you agree about RidgeView,KentRising said:I can vouch for Ridgeview. Was a wine journalist in a former life and have visited the winery to see how their sparkling 'Merret' is made. The rosé sparkling in particular was a winner. The French don't like it up 'em.
Now, how does one go about getting a job as a wine journalist? Is it compulsory to go on about "subtle hints of forest fruits, but with a tang of peach and with a wonderful finish" and all that rubbish? Actually a better question, because I can write that sort of crap all day long, does it have to be accurate? Does anyone take any notice? Also do you get full expenses paid?
A wine journalist could be the ideal paying hobby for my declining years, as long as I didn't have to get on an aeroplane.0 -
-
I'm so pleased that Liz Kendall is on This Week - far better tele performer than Alan Johnson!0
-
"No, the country comes fourth!"Mortimer said:I'm so pleased that Liz Kendall is on This Week - far better tele performer than Alan Johnson!
0 -
They may well speak but I can see a result like MikeK has posted below once the Scots and Ulster have spoken too!YossariansChild said:
Yes dear in Merrie Little England.HYUFD said:
In England maybe, in the UK as a whole less clearYossariansChild said:Whisper it; Leave might be winning this.
Anyway up very early tomorrow to leaflet commuters. The battle goes on regardless.
Night all.
'Smile at us, pay us, pass us; but do not quite forget;
For we are the people of (Little) England, that never have spoken yet.'0 -
The 'phones don't pick up right wing opinion.rcs1000 said:
If IPSOS shows 45:55, we've likely lost . We need something closer to 50:50 given a lot of people will bottle it in the privacy of the polling booth.chestnut said:
Ipsos showing 45:55 will be good enough for me.rcs1000 said:
I'll believe it when phone polls start showing it as 50:50.MP_SE said:I am really struggling to believe this. I think it will be close like 52/48 Remain on a 60% turnout.
https://twitter.com/IainDale/status/741029555478142977
People get shy. They lie about who they voted for (usually saying Labour, often Lib Dem) and then they lie about how they will vote.
It's only a few percent swing, but enough.0 -
NE Lincs Lab hold
Lab 758
UKIP 462
Con 312
Gre 40
TUSC 260 -
There must be a way of finding the info.HurstLlama said:
Oddly enough under the last Labour government it was very easy to drill down to project and sub-project level, never mind country or even multilateral/bilateral level. In fact as government web sites go the DfID one under Gordon Brown was superbly informative.Luckyguy1983 said:
To add to this, the only statistics I can find for 2015 (published last December) do not break down multilateral overseas development by organisation, one can only assume because it doesn't look great.Luckyguy1983 said:I've been doing a bit of research and found out (everyone else probably already knew this) that a percentage of Britain's DISTENDED overseas aid budget is called MULTILATERAL overseas development aid (as opposed to bilateral overseas development aid), and instead of being given to the needy, just gets bunged to big international organisations instead.
Guess what organisation takes the biggest cut of this multilateral overseas development aid? Correct - the European Commission. To be precise, in 2013, £813million to the European Commission, and £407million to the European Commission - European Development Fund. So that's well over a billion (I can't find 2015 figures, but international aid has gone up significantly since then) of British tax payers money going to the EU completely off the books. I suspect it's probably over £2 billion now, and potentially significant in this 'lying over the figures' debate.
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/403381/SID-2014-revised-UNDP-figure-feb15.pdf
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/512978/Provisional-UK-Official-Dev-Ass-Proportion-Gross-Nat-Income2015a.pdf
It changed very quickly once Cameron and Clegg got in and implemented the silly 0.7% policy. I found it had become a sort of giant press release and actual detail was very difficult to find and when compared to Labour's offering, actually impossible.0 -
Well from what I also glanced at today they hate Major and they hate Blair and they hate Cameron, nothing Mail readers like more than a good hating....MP_SE said:
Mail Online comments make for interesting reading.John_N4 said:This kind of thing by Jeremy Corbyn is bound to win some votes for Leave:
http://i.imgur.com/TKkldpc.jpg0 -
Lib Dem surge.MarkSenior said:NE Lincs Lab hold
Lab 758
UKIP 462
Con 312
Gre 40
TUSC 260 -
Fox
Clinton 42 Trump 39
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/poll-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-2241560 -
LOLold_labour said:
He is looking like Gillian Duffy's flighty, younger sister on a bad day.Danny565 said:Eddie Izzard.... make it stop....
0 -
FoI Perhaps? Maybe the information is there to the level of detail that it was under Labour but I gave up trying to find it.Luckyguy1983 said:
There must be a way of finding the info.HurstLlama said:
Oddly enough under the last Labour government it was very easy to drill down to project and sub-project level, never mind country or even multilateral/bilateral level. In fact as government web sites go the DfID one under Gordon Brown was superbly informative.Luckyguy1983 said:
To add to this, the only statistics I can find for 2015 (published last December) do not break down multilateral overseas development by organisation, one can only assume because it doesn't look great.Luckyguy1983 said:I've been doing a bit of research and found out (everyone else probably already knew this) that a percentage of Britain's DISTENDED overseas aid budget is called MULTILATERAL overseas development aid (as opposed to bilateral overseas development aid), and instead of being given to the needy, just gets bunged to big international organisations instead.
Guess what organisation takes the biggest cut of this multilateral overseas development aid? Correct - the European Commission. To be precise, in 2013, £813million to the European Commission, and £407million to the European Commission - European Development Fund. So that's well over a billion (I can't find 2015 figures, but international aid has gone up significantly since then) of British tax payers money going to the EU completely off the books. I suspect it's probably over £2 billion now, and potentially significant in this 'lying over the figures' debate.
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/403381/SID-2014-revised-UNDP-figure-feb15.pdf
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/512978/Provisional-UK-Official-Dev-Ass-Proportion-Gross-Nat-Income2015a.pdf
It changed very quickly once Cameron and Clegg got in and implemented the silly 0.7% policy. I found it had become a sort of giant press release and actual detail was very difficult to find and when compared to Labour's offering, actually impossible.0 -
Oh, well it was a nice thought for a while. Thanks anyway.KentRising said:
Unfortunately I can't help you with that as I was writing about wine from the production end, as an agricultural commodity, rather than the consumption end. So it was the unsexy stuff like harvest tonnage of wine grapes and import/export of bulk and bottled, not sniffing, swilling and spitting the end product! My hunch though is that most of it doesn't have to be accurate, no, it's subjective and - largely - a lot of bollocks.HurstLlama said:
Glad you agree about RidgeView,KentRising said:I can vouch for Ridgeview. Was a wine journalist in a former life and have visited the winery to see how their sparkling 'Merret' is made. The rosé sparkling in particular was a winner. The French don't like it up 'em.
Now, how does one go about getting a job as a wine journalist? Is it compulsory to go on about "subtle hints of forest fruits, but with a tang of peach and with a wonderful finish" and all that rubbish? Actually a better question, because I can write that sort of crap all day long, does it have to be accurate? Does anyone take any notice? Also do you get full expenses paid?
A wine journalist could be the ideal paying hobby for my declining years, as long as I didn't have to get on an aeroplane.0 -
Lambeth Gipsy Hill Green surge but Lab hold
Lab 1220
Green 1184
Con 210
LDem 84
UKIP 73
Ind 24
TUSC 190 -
OH DEAR
@angelaeagle storms off after debate saying "that was a Fucking Disaster"
#ITVEURef #VoteLeave @StrongerIn https://t.co/SxYDG6fWjX0 -
FPT
No, there are plenty of Conservative MPs on the Remain/Government side. The fact that one has decided to change her mind over a few weeks shouldn't really be that big an issue, and it's certainly not one worthy of leading the morning BBC news bulletins.RobD said:
I think a defection from one side to another is more of a story than someone simply declaring they are for leave/remain.Wulfrun_Phil said:
I wonder whether the BBC will choose to describe him as a "senior" Labour MP? And give as much prominence to his declaring for Leave as they gave to the declaration of a Conservative MP for Remain today? Or even report his joining the Leave campaign at all.Scott_P said:@PickardJE: Apparently the Labour MP joining the Out campaign is none other than....John Cryer, chair of the Parliamentary Labour Party. Very credible.
By contrast, with very few Labour MPs coming out for Leave, the fact that the Chair of the Parliamentary Labour Party has switched from undeclared to Leave should be a much more substantive story. But it won't lead the BBC news bulletins, and I suspect won't even make them at all.0 -
Essex CC UKIP gain from Lab
UKIP 2034
Lab 1800
Con 878
Green 2640 -
Actualy that isn't so much the problem. I've had a look at the base figures from the recent polling and the most important difference between the methods is the phone polls are consistently showing the older working-age segment as being much closer to the young (more remain, less leave) than to pensioners when compared to online polls. This is hugely important because they make up by far the largest chunk of actual voters.chestnut said:
The 'phones don't pick up right wing opinion.rcs1000 said:
If IPSOS shows 45:55, we've likely lost . We need something closer to 50:50 given a lot of people will bottle it in the privacy of the polling booth.chestnut said:
Ipsos showing 45:55 will be good enough for me.rcs1000 said:
I'll believe it when phone polls start showing it as 50:50.MP_SE said:I am really struggling to believe this. I think it will be close like 52/48 Remain on a 60% turnout.
https://twitter.com/IainDale/status/741029555478142977
People get shy. They lie about who they voted for (usually saying Labour, often Lib Dem) and then they lie about how they will vote.
It's only a few percent swing, but enough.
I think we all know why phone polls might have difficulty getting representative samples of working age people...0 -
The phones were more accurate than online last Maychestnut said:
The 'phones don't pick up right wing opinion.rcs1000 said:
If IPSOS shows 45:55, we've likely lost . We need something closer to 50:50 given a lot of people will bottle it in the privacy of the polling booth.chestnut said:
Ipsos showing 45:55 will be good enough for me.rcs1000 said:
I'll believe it when phone polls start showing it as 50:50.MP_SE said:I am really struggling to believe this. I think it will be close like 52/48 Remain on a 60% turnout.
https://twitter.com/IainDale/status/741029555478142977
People get shy. They lie about who they voted for (usually saying Labour, often Lib Dem) and then they lie about how they will vote.
It's only a few percent swing, but enough.0 -
A common misconception.HYUFD said:
The phones were more accurate than online last Maychestnut said:
The 'phones don't pick up right wing opinion.rcs1000 said:
If IPSOS shows 45:55, we've likely lost . We need something closer to 50:50 given a lot of people will bottle it in the privacy of the polling booth.chestnut said:
Ipsos showing 45:55 will be good enough for me.rcs1000 said:
I'll believe it when phone polls start showing it as 50:50.MP_SE said:I am really struggling to believe this. I think it will be close like 52/48 Remain on a 60% turnout.
https://twitter.com/IainDale/status/741029555478142977
People get shy. They lie about who they voted for (usually saying Labour, often Lib Dem) and then they lie about how they will vote.
It's only a few percent swing, but enough.
They were more accurate with Tory/Labour.
They were less accurate with Right/Left.0 -
"In the year of Our Lord 2016, British patriots, starving and outnumbered, charged the fields of EURef. They fought like warrior poets. They fought like Britons. And they won their Freedom."0
-
They got UKIP more accurate than the online polls too as far as I can recallchestnut said:
A common misconception.HYUFD said:
The phones were more accurate than online last Maychestnut said:
The 'phones don't pick up right wing opinion.rcs1000 said:
If IPSOS shows 45:55, we've likely lost . We need something closer to 50:50 given a lot of people will bottle it in the privacy of the polling booth.chestnut said:
Ipsos showing 45:55 will be good enough for me.rcs1000 said:
I'll believe it when phone polls start showing it as 50:50.MP_SE said:I am really struggling to believe this. I think it will be close like 52/48 Remain on a 60% turnout.
https://twitter.com/IainDale/status/741029555478142977
People get shy. They lie about who they voted for (usually saying Labour, often Lib Dem) and then they lie about how they will vote.
It's only a few percent swing, but enough.
They were more accurate with Tory/Labour.
They were less accurate with Right/Left.0 -
Where Essex man leads......MarkSenior said:Essex CC UKIP gain from Lab
UKIP 2034
Lab 1800
Con 878
Green 2640 -
Nope, re. UKIP the Online polls were closer to GE2015:HYUFD said:
They got UKIP more accurate than the online polls too as far as I can recallchestnut said:
A common misconception.HYUFD said:
The phones were more accurate than online last Maychestnut said:
The 'phones don't pick up right wing opinion.rcs1000 said:
If IPSOS shows 45:55, we've likely lost . We need something closer to 50:50 given a lot of people will bottle it in the privacy of the polling booth.chestnut said:
Ipsos showing 45:55 will be good enough for me.rcs1000 said:
I'll believe it when phone polls start showing it as 50:50.MP_SE said:I am really struggling to believe this. I think it will be close like 52/48 Remain on a 60% turnout.
https://twitter.com/IainDale/status/741029555478142977
People get shy. They lie about who they voted for (usually saying Labour, often Lib Dem) and then they lie about how they will vote.
It's only a few percent swing, but enough.
They were more accurate with Tory/Labour.
They were less accurate with Right/Left.
https://twitter.com/Sunil_P2/status/5968626772904591360 -
Online was more accurate when you look at Con/UKIP combined.HYUFD said:
They got UKIP more accurate than the online polls too as far as I can recallchestnut said:
A common misconception.HYUFD said:
The phones were more accurate than online last Maychestnut said:
The 'phones don't pick up right wing opinion.rcs1000 said:
If IPSOS shows 45:55, we've likely lost . We need something closer to 50:50 given a lot of people will bottle it in the privacy of the polling booth.chestnut said:
Ipsos showing 45:55 will be good enough for me.rcs1000 said:
I'll believe it when phone polls start showing it as 50:50.MP_SE said:I am really struggling to believe this. I think it will be close like 52/48 Remain on a 60% turnout.
https://twitter.com/IainDale/status/741029555478142977
People get shy. They lie about who they voted for (usually saying Labour, often Lib Dem) and then they lie about how they will vote.
It's only a few percent swing, but enough.
They were more accurate with Tory/Labour.
They were less accurate with Right/Left.
Phones are terrible at picking up all those working class 'Labour' people that really vote UKIP.0 -
UKIP got 12.9%, so online polling still overestimated their total, phone polling slightly underestimated itSunil_Prasannan said:
Nope, re. UKIP the Online polls were closer to GE2015:HYUFD said:
They got UKIP more accurate than the online polls too as far as I can recallchestnut said:
A common misconception.HYUFD said:
The phones were more accurate than online last Maychestnut said:
The 'phones don't pick up right wing opinion.rcs1000 said:
If IPSOS shows 45:55, we've likely lost . We need something closer to 50:50 given a lot of people will bottle it in the privacy of the polling booth.chestnut said:
Ipsos showing 45:55 will be good enough for me.rcs1000 said:
I'll believe it when phone polls start showing it as 50:50.MP_SE said:I am really struggling to believe this. I think it will be close like 52/48 Remain on a 60% turnout.
https://twitter.com/IainDale/status/741029555478142977
People get shy. They lie about who they voted for (usually saying Labour, often Lib Dem) and then they lie about how they will vote.
It's only a few percent swing, but enough.
They were more accurate with Tory/Labour.
They were less accurate with Right/Left.
https://twitter.com/Sunil_P2/status/5968626772904591360 -
Look at the graph. The last few online polls were within 1%, the last few phone polls were more than 1% out.HYUFD said:
UKIP got 12.9%, so online polling still overestimated their total, phone polling slightly underestimated itSunil_Prasannan said:
Nope, re. UKIP the Online polls were closer to GE2015:HYUFD said:
They got UKIP more accurate than the online polls too as far as I can recallchestnut said:
A common misconception.HYUFD said:
The phones were more accurate than online last Maychestnut said:
The 'phones don't pick up right wing opinion.rcs1000 said:
If IPSOS shows 45:55, we've likely lost . We need something closer to 50:50 given a lot of people will bottle it in the privacy of the polling booth.chestnut said:
Ipsos showing 45:55 will be good enough for me.rcs1000 said:
I'll believe it when phone polls start showing it as 50:50.MP_SE said:I am really struggling to believe this. I think it will be close like 52/48 Remain on a 60% turnout.
https://twitter.com/IainDale/status/741029555478142977
People get shy. They lie about who they voted for (usually saying Labour, often Lib Dem) and then they lie about how they will vote.
It's only a few percent swing, but enough.
They were more accurate with Tory/Labour.
They were less accurate with Right/Left.
https://twitter.com/Sunil_P2/status/5968626772904591360 -
Leaving aside you're misquoting a rampant antisemite, there is one thing that has always bugged me about that speech. How hard are "warrior poets"? Are they better fighters than warriors who only write prose? Do we take into account things like scansion, metre, genre? How are they recruited? "Guys, we need somebody who can swing an axe and write sonnets"?Sunil_Prasannan said:"In the year of Our Lord 2016, British patriots, starving and outnumbered, charged the fields of EURef. They fought like warrior poets. They fought like Britons. And they won their Freedom."
0 -
The last online polls had UKIP on 13.5%, the last phones 11.5% so little real difference, the former a bit over, the latter a bit underSunil_Prasannan said:
Look at the graph. The last few online polls were within 1%, the last few phone polls were more than 1% out.HYUFD said:
UKIP got 12.9%, so online polling still overestimated their total, phone polling slightly underestimated itSunil_Prasannan said:
Nope, re. UKIP the Online polls were closer to GE2015:HYUFD said:
They got UKIP more accurate than the online polls too as far as I can recallchestnut said:
A common misconception.HYUFD said:
The phones were more accurate than online last Maychestnut said:
The 'phones don't pick up right wing opinion.rcs1000 said:
If IPSOS shows 45:55, we've likely lost . We need something closer to 50:50 given a lot of people will bottle it in the privacy of the polling booth.chestnut said:
Ipsos showing 45:55 will be good enough for me.rcs1000 said:
I'll believe it when phone polls start showing it as 50:50.MP_SE said:I am really struggling to believe this. I think it will be close like 52/48 Remain on a 60% turnout.
https://twitter.com/IainDale/status/741029555478142977
People get shy. They lie about who they voted for (usually saying Labour, often Lib Dem) and then they lie about how they will vote.
It's only a few percent swing, but enough.
They were more accurate with Tory/Labour.
They were less accurate with Right/Left.
https://twitter.com/Sunil_P2/status/5968626772904591360 -
Anti-Semite Adolf believed in a Single European Superstate!viewcode said:
Leaving aside you're misquoting a rampant antisemite, there is one thing that has always bugged me about that speech. How hard are "warrior poets"? Are they better fighters than warriors who only write prose? Do we take into account things like scansion, metre, genre? How are they recruited? "Guys, we need somebody who can swing an axe and write sonnets"?Sunil_Prasannan said:"In the year of Our Lord 2016, British patriots, starving and outnumbered, charged the fields of EURef. They fought like warrior poets. They fought like Britons. And they won their Freedom."
Believe in BRITAIN!
Be LEAVE!0 -
0
-
Lib Dem landslide hold in Surrey Docks
LDem 1523
Lab 619
Con 380
Green 218
UKIP 187
Ind 100 -
Horrorchannel+1 is on channel320 on the Sky selector.Sunil_Prasannan said:@viewcode
Just realised I missed Re-Animator on Horror Channel! Ooops!
I can't really look at Jeffrey Combs without thinking of DS90 -
Online still closerHYUFD said:
The last online polls had UKIP on 13.5%, the last phones 11.5% so little real difference, the former a bit over, the latter a bit underSunil_Prasannan said:
Look at the graph. The last few online polls were within 1%, the last few phone polls were more than 1% out.HYUFD said:
UKIP got 12.9%, so online polling still overestimated their total, phone polling slightly underestimated itSunil_Prasannan said:
Nope, re. UKIP the Online polls were closer to GE2015:HYUFD said:
They got UKIP more accurate than the online polls too as far as I can recallchestnut said:
A common misconception.HYUFD said:
The phones were more accurate than online last Maychestnut said:
The 'phones don't pick up right wing opinion.rcs1000 said:
If IPSOS shows 45:55, we've likely lost . We need something closer to 50:50 given a lot of people will bottle it in the privacy of the polling booth.chestnut said:
Ipsos showing 45:55 will be good enough for me.rcs1000 said:
I'll believe it when phone polls start showing it as 50:50.MP_SE said:I am really struggling to believe this. I think it will be close like 52/48 Remain on a 60% turnout.
https://twitter.com/IainDale/status/741029555478142977
People get shy. They lie about who they voted for (usually saying Labour, often Lib Dem) and then they lie about how they will vote.
It's only a few percent swing, but enough.
They were more accurate with Tory/Labour.
They were less accurate with Right/Left.
https://twitter.com/Sunil_P2/status/596862677290459136
By contrast phones were closer to the Tory score:
https://twitter.com/Sunil_P2/status/5968643824344186890 -
Darn, only got Freeview here!viewcode said:
Horrorchannel+1 is on channel320 on the Sky selector.Sunil_Prasannan said:@viewcode
Just realised I missed Re-Animator on Horror Channel! Ooops!
I can't really look at Jeffrey Combs without thinking of DS90 -
There has to be half a chance of the Lib Dems regaining that constituency. Bermondsey and Southwark, isn't it?MarkSenior said:Lib Dem landslide hold in Surrey Docks
LDem 1523
Lab 619
Con 380
Green 218
UKIP 187
Ind 100 -
Indeed, the phones got it almost bang on at the start of April before falling back a bit, goodnightSunil_Prasannan said:
Online still closerHYUFD said:
The last online polls had UKIP on 13.5%, the last phones 11.5% so little real difference, the former a bit over, the latter a bit underSunil_Prasannan said:
Look at the graph. The last few online polls were within 1%, the last few phone polls were more than 1% out.HYUFD said:
UKIP got 12.9%, so online polling still overestimated their total, phone polling slightly underestimated itSunil_Prasannan said:
Nope, re. UKIP the Online polls were closer to GE2015:HYUFD said:
They got UKIP more accurate than the online polls too as far as I can recallchestnut said:
A common misconception.HYUFD said:
The phones were more accurate than online last Maychestnut said:
The 'phones don't pick up right wing opinion.rcs1000 said:
If IPSOS shows 45:55, we've likely lost . We need something closer to 50:50 given a lot of people will bottle it in the privacy of the polling booth.chestnut said:
Ipsos showing 45:55 will be good enough for me.rcs1000 said:
I'll believe it when phone polls start showing it as 50:50.MP_SE said:I am really struggling to believe this. I think it will be close like 52/48 Remain on a 60% turnout.
https://twitter.com/IainDale/status/741029555478142977
People get shy. They lie about who they voted for (usually saying Labour, often Lib Dem) and then they lie about how they will vote.
It's only a few percent swing, but enough.
They were more accurate with Tory/Labour.
They were less accurate with Right/Left.
https://twitter.com/Sunil_P2/status/596862677290459136
By contrast phones were closer to the Tory score:
https://twitter.com/Sunil_P2/status/5968643824344186890 -
Twitter fight already
Trump: Obama just endorsed Crooked Hillary. He wants four more years of Obama—but nobody else does!
Hillary: Delete your account.
Trump: How long did it take your staff of 823 people to think that up–and where are your 33,000 emails that you deleted?
0 -
Don't forget Labour!HYUFD said:
Indeed, the phones got it almost bang on at the start of April before falling back a bit, goodnightSunil_Prasannan said:
Online still closerHYUFD said:
The last online polls had UKIP on 13.5%, the last phones 11.5% so little real difference, the former a bit over, the latter a bit underSunil_Prasannan said:
Look at the graph. The last few online polls were within 1%, the last few phone polls were more than 1% out.HYUFD said:
UKIP got 12.9%, so online polling still overestimated their total, phone polling slightly underestimated itSunil_Prasannan said:
Nope, re. UKIP the Online polls were closer to GE2015:HYUFD said:
They got UKIP more accurate than the online polls too as far as I can recallchestnut said:
A common misconception.HYUFD said:
The phones were more accurate than online last Maychestnut said:
The 'phones don't pick up right wing opinion.rcs1000 said:
If IPSOS shows 45:55, we've likely lost . We need something closer to 50:50 given a lot of people will bottle it in the privacy of the polling booth.chestnut said:
Ipsos showing 45:55 will be good enough for me.rcs1000 said:
I'll believe it when phone polls start showing it as 50:50.MP_SE said:I am really struggling to believe this. I think it will be close like 52/48 Remain on a 60% turnout.
https://twitter.com/IainDale/status/741029555478142977
People get shy. They lie about who they voted for (usually saying Labour, often Lib Dem) and then they lie about how they will vote.
It's only a few percent swing, but enough.
They were more accurate with Tory/Labour.
They were less accurate with Right/Left.
https://twitter.com/Sunil_P2/status/596862677290459136
By contrast phones were closer to the Tory score:
https://twitter.com/Sunil_P2/status/596864382434418689
https://twitter.com/Sunil_P2/status/5968638752759480320 -
Britain Elects @britainelects 23m23 minutes ago
Laindon Park and Fryerns (Essex) result:
UKIP: 42.6% (+6.8)
LAB: 33.5% (-3.2)
CON: 18.4% (+2.6)
GRN: 5.5% (+3.3)
Britain Elects @britainelects 27m27 minutes ago
UKIP GAIN Basildon Laindon Park & Fryerns (Essex) from Labour.0 -
The Greens nearly took a seat off Labour on a 27% swing in London.
Britain Elects @britainelects 30m30 minutes ago
Gipsy Hill (Lambeth) result:
LAB: 43.4% (-23.6)
GRN: 42.1% (+31.2)
CON: 7.5% (-5.6)
LDEM: 3.0% (-1.9)
UKIP: 2.6% (-1.6)
IND: 0.9%0 -
https://twitter.com/election_data/status/741053461157023746
Interesting context to the Gyspy Hill result.0 -
Corbynism sweeping the nation, dirty sleazy kippers on the slide ;-)chestnut said:The Greens nearly took a seat off Labour on a 27% swing in London.
Britain Elects @britainelects 30m30 minutes ago
Gipsy Hill (Lambeth) result:
LAB: 43.4% (-23.6)
GRN: 42.1% (+31.2)
CON: 7.5% (-5.6)
LDEM: 3.0% (-1.9)
UKIP: 2.6% (-1.6)
IND: 0.9%
Goodnight all. For those who didn't see it the second half of This Week was far more nuanced than most of the vapid bilge that has been the bulk of the Brexit debate in recent weeks.0 -
Strong Britain believed in standing up for the Poles. Leave Britain believes in sending them home.Sunil_Prasannan said:
Anti-Semite Adolf believed in a Single European Superstate!viewcode said:
Leaving aside you're misquoting a rampant antisemite, there is one thing that has always bugged me about that speech. How hard are "warrior poets"? Are they better fighters than warriors who only write prose? Do we take into account things like scansion, metre, genre? How are they recruited? "Guys, we need somebody who can swing an axe and write sonnets"?Sunil_Prasannan said:"In the year of Our Lord 2016, British patriots, starving and outnumbered, charged the fields of EURef. They fought like warrior poets. They fought like Britons. And they won their Freedom."
Believe in BRITAIN!
Be LEAVE!
0 -
Shots fired, repeat shots fired...one thing for certain this POTUS campaign is certainly not going to be dull!!!HYUFD said:Twitter fight already
Trump: Obama just endorsed Crooked Hillary. He wants four more years of Obama—but nobody else does!
Hillary: Delete your account.
Trump: How long did it take your staff of 823 people to think that up–and where are your 33,000 emails that you deleted?0 -
Britain Elects @britainelects 27m27 minutes agofoxinsoxuk said:
Corbynism sweeping the nation, dirty sleazy kippers on the slide ;-)chestnut said:The Greens nearly took a seat off Labour on a 27% swing in London.
Britain Elects @britainelects 30m30 minutes ago
Gipsy Hill (Lambeth) result:
LAB: 43.4% (-23.6)
GRN: 42.1% (+31.2)
CON: 7.5% (-5.6)
LDEM: 3.0% (-1.9)
UKIP: 2.6% (-1.6)
IND: 0.9%
UKIP GAIN Basildon Laindon Park & Fryerns (Essex) from Labour.0 -
Most insightful comment she made all night!PlatoSaid said:OH DEAR
@angelaeagle storms off after debate saying "that was a Fucking Disaster"
#ITVEURef #VoteLeave @StrongerIn https://t.co/SxYDG6fWjX0 -
Got a load of Labour Leave leaflets delivered yesterday (I live in the strongest Labour seat in the country) and I have put my Vote Leave banner up outside house with a little Union Jack flag flying over it. Let's do this!
Anecdotal but of the five swing voters I know, all five are now moving towards Leave.0 -
Who is this "LEAVE BRITAIN"?williamglenn said:
Strong Britain believed in standing up for the Poles. Leave Britain believes in sending them home.Sunil_Prasannan said:
Anti-Semite Adolf believed in a Single European Superstate!viewcode said:
Leaving aside you're misquoting a rampant antisemite, there is one thing that has always bugged me about that speech. How hard are "warrior poets"? Are they better fighters than warriors who only write prose? Do we take into account things like scansion, metre, genre? How are they recruited? "Guys, we need somebody who can swing an axe and write sonnets"?Sunil_Prasannan said:"In the year of Our Lord 2016, British patriots, starving and outnumbered, charged the fields of EURef. They fought like warrior poets. They fought like Britons. And they won their Freedom."
Believe in BRITAIN!
Be LEAVE!0 -
She did exactly the same during the Farage/Cameron vs audience debate, but because Farage and Vote Leave came off worse in that debate some of their supporters were complaining about her performance as moderator....hunchman said:Well done Julie Etchingham - wonderful moderator of the debate tonight, firm when needed, and allowed the debate to flow as much as possible.
0 -
so is voter registration closed now?0
-
I agree. Brilliant to see both John Mann and Dennis Skinner come out for Leave in tomorrow's papers.Viceroy said:Got a load of Labour Leave leaflets delivered yesterday (I live in the strongest Labour seat in the country) and I have put my Vote Leave banner up outside house with a little Union Jack flag flying over it. Let's do this!
Anecdotal but of the five swing voters I know, all five are now moving towards Leave.0 -
Yes there is. They love Britain.HYUFD said:
Well from what I also glanced at today they hate Major and they hate Blair and they hate Cameron, nothing Mail readers like more than a good hating....MP_SE said:
Mail Online comments make for interesting reading.John_N4 said:This kind of thing by Jeremy Corbyn is bound to win some votes for Leave:
http://i.imgur.com/TKkldpc.jpg0 -
Looking at the ITV debate Remain are trying to win this from the left. They are going for the 50% +1 vote strategy. Cameron will do ANYTHING to win an election, even trash the Conservative party. The line is clear with the left wing dog whistle "Little England" and personal attacks on Boris I'm sure Gove is next for the attack. They are trying to consolidate their lead in Scotland, N.I and the big English cities. Will it be enough to galvanise the left and especially the young? It could be, look at Barking and Austria. But I don't think the voters see Boris as trump-lite. Also hard for Cameron et al to appeal to voters he has been attacking for 6 years.
Leave started to talk about the risks of remaining- they need to push this much harder.0 -
Warning; Personal Opinion:
The problem with the Remain campaign in this referendum has not been that they're "scare-mongering". Quite the opposite. They need to take it to the next level. The leavers are a disgrace and are as good as traitors to this country (and to their ancestors) in the disregard they show to the consequences of their actions. Us Remainers are the TRUE patriots and what your grand-parents TRULY fought for.
If we choose to leave the EU in two weeks time, prepare for a very dark journey ahead. Very few in the 30s predicted there be a world war ahead except for that far right-wing nutcase maverick called Churchill who everyone ignored, laughed at and derided... Hmm...
We have a EU which is in danger of collapse. A system that has stopped war for almost 70 years. That has acted as a bulk-ward against external Communism and internal Nationalism and potential fascism. The last ten years have been shit - this is undeniable. Greece and other counties have driven things to breaking point - something the EU is only just recovering from. And we think that their 3rd largest economy and 2nd largest military pulling won't cause massive MASSIVE problems? When France, the largest military is on the brink of electing a fascist next year (and surely will happen if we quit).. really?
Cameron may be many things, but on this is is prescient. We are the balance between a decade of war and a decade of peace. Everything is very finely balanced - So choose wisely! ;D0 -
The most watched television channels tonight:
ITV - Debate of 3 Remain vesus 3 Leave
- Remain come across as attacking, mean, project fear and nothing positive to say
- Leave have to defend personal attacks on Johnson but come across with a positive message of hope
- LEAVE WIN
BBC ONE - Question Time (3 Leave, 2 Remain)
- Remain had some sensible points but Benn totally undermined by rude, shouty, incoherent Eddie Izzard
- Grayling calm and logical, Farage acting statesmanlike, emotional Telegraph journo
- LEAVE WIN
0 -
Troll much. "balance between a decade of war...and peace" lol give over.Mikest1982 said:Warning; Personal Opinion:
The problem with the Remain campaign in this referendum has not been that they're "scare-mongering". Quite the opposite. They need to take it to the next level. The leavers are a disgrace and are as good as traitors to this country (and to their ancestors) in the disregard they show to the consequences of their actions. Us Remainers are the TRUE patriots and what your grand-parents TRULY fought for.
If we choose to leave the EU in two weeks time, prepare for a very dark journey ahead. Very few in the 30s predicted there be a world war ahead except for that far right-wing nutcase maverick called Churchill who everyone ignored, laughed at and derided... Hmm...
We have a EU which is in danger of collapse. A system that has stopped war for almost 70 years. That has acted as a bulk-ward against external Communism and internal Nationalism and potential fascism. The last ten years have been shit - this is undeniable. Greece and other counties have driven things to breaking point - something the EU is only just recovering from. And we think that their 3rd largest economy and 2nd largest military pulling won't cause massive MASSIVE problems? When France, the largest military is on the brink of electing a fascist next year (and surely will happen if we quit).. really?
Cameron may be many things, but on this is is prescient. We are the balance between a decade of war and a decade of peace. Everything is very finely balanced - So choose wisely! ;D0 -
By adopting the all out attack on Leave and the personal attacks on Boris, the Remain camp seem to be trying to shore up their existing supporters rather than gain new ones.nunu said:Looking at the ITV debate Remain are trying to win this from the left. They are going for the 50% +1 vote strategy. Cameron will do ANYTHING to win an election, even trash the Conservative party. The line is clear with the left wing dog whistle "Little England" and personal attacks on Boris I'm sure Gove is next for the attack. They are trying to consolidate their lead in Scotland, N.I and the big English cities. Will it be enough to galvanise the left and especially the young? It could be, look at Barking and Austria. But I don't think the voters see Boris as trump-lite. Also hard for Cameron et al to appeal to voters he has been attacking for 6 years.
Leave started to talk about the risks of remaining- they need to push this much harder.
This strategy would have worked when they were ahead at the start of the campaign but now they are behind it's not going to work.
Remain will need some convincing positive reasons for being in the EU if they are to win back support.
0 -
https://yougov.co.uk/turnout-o-meter/?turnout=81&overallremaing=2&agefactor=1&classfactor=1
This fun to play around with. It shows on a 2% remain vote the turnout needs to be 91% for remain to win. LOL.0 -
Salmond and Heseltine win thumping victory in Oxford Union debate for Remain last night over Michael Howard and Hannan. Now that debate would have been worth watching. Is it on line anywhere?0
-
I think the bulwark against Communism is properly called the US of A, not the EU.nunu said:
Troll much. "balance between a decade of war...and peace" lol give over.Mikest1982 said:Warning; Personal Opinion:
The problem with the Remain campaign in this referendum has not been that they're "scare-mongering". Quite the opposite. They need to take it to the next level. The leavers are a disgrace and are as good as traitors to this country (and to their ancestors) in the disregard they show to the consequences of their actions. Us Remainers are the TRUE patriots and what your grand-parents TRULY fought for.
If we choose to leave the EU in two weeks time, prepare for a very dark journey ahead. Very few in the 30s predicted there be a world war ahead except for that far right-wing nutcase maverick called Churchill who everyone ignored, laughed at and derided... Hmm...
We have a EU which is in danger of collapse. A system that has stopped war for almost 70 years. That has acted as a bulk-ward against external Communism and internal Nationalism and potential fascism. The last ten years have been shit - this is undeniable. Greece and other counties have driven things to breaking point - something the EU is only just recovering from. And we think that their 3rd largest economy and 2nd largest military pulling won't cause massive MASSIVE problems? When France, the largest military is on the brink of electing a fascist next year (and surely will happen if we quit).. really?
Cameron may be many things, but on this is is prescient. We are the balance between a decade of war and a decade of peace. Everything is very finely balanced - So choose wisely! ;D
My Leave journey is bright and sunny. You seem to be the one with very dark journeys.0 -
It's interesting when opinions you dismiss are regarded as "trolling". This is how the EU Parliament (for better or worse) deals with Nigel Farage.nunu said:
Troll much. "balance between a decade of war...and peace" lol give over.Mikest1982 said:Warning; Personal Opinion:
The problem with the Remain campaign in this referendum has not been that they're "scare-mongering". Quite the opposite. They need to take it to the next level. The leavers are a disgrace and are as good as traitors to this country (and to their ancestors) in the disregard they show to the consequences of their actions. Us Remainers are the TRUE patriots and what your grand-parents TRULY fought for.
If we choose to leave the EU in two weeks time, prepare for a very dark journey ahead. Very few in the 30s predicted there be a world war ahead except for that far right-wing nutcase maverick called Churchill who everyone ignored, laughed at and derided... Hmm...
We have a EU which is in danger of collapse. A system that has stopped war for almost 70 years. That has acted as a bulk-ward against external Communism and internal Nationalism and potential fascism. The last ten years have been shit - this is undeniable. Greece and other counties have driven things to breaking point - something the EU is only just recovering from. And we think that their 3rd largest economy and 2nd largest military pulling won't cause massive MASSIVE problems? When France, the largest military is on the brink of electing a fascist next year (and surely will happen if we quit).. really?
Cameron may be many things, but on this is is prescient. We are the balance between a decade of war and a decade of peace. Everything is very finely balanced - So choose wisely! ;D
Explain this one please?0 -
Turnout is going to kill Remain according to yougov on a 53% turnout Leave win even with a 4% remain lead- turnout needs to be 71% for Remain to win.0
-
Powerful background on the Gilfoyle case (from his sister)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SR0bKgKw1A0
It could happen to any of us...0 -
There's been many examples in history of revolutions with "very bright and sunny futures".. most of them ended quite darkly. Given the situation, by what circumstance do you pretend this possible future will be any better?MTimT said:
I think the bulwark against Communism is properly called the US of A, not the EU.nunu said:
Troll much. "balance between a decade of war...and peace" lol give over.Mikest1982 said:Warning; Personal Opinion:
The problem with the Remain campaign in this referendum has not been that they're "scare-mongering". Quite the opposite. They need to take it to the next level. The leavers are a disgrace and are as good as traitors to this country (and to their ancestors) in the disregard they show to the consequences of their actions. Us Remainers are the TRUE patriots and what your grand-parents TRULY fought for.
If we choose to leave the EU in two weeks time, prepare for a very dark journey ahead. Very few in the 30s predicted there be a world war ahead except for that far right-wing nutcase maverick called Churchill who everyone ignored, laughed at and derided... Hmm...
We have a EU which is in danger of collapse. A system that has stopped war for almost 70 years. That has acted as a bulk-ward against external Communism and internal Nationalism and potential fascism. The last ten years have been shit - this is undeniable. Greece and other counties have driven things to breaking point - something the EU is only just recovering from. And we think that their 3rd largest economy and 2nd largest military pulling won't cause massive MASSIVE problems? When France, the largest military is on the brink of electing a fascist next year (and surely will happen if we quit).. really?
Cameron may be many things, but on this is is prescient. We are the balance between a decade of war and a decade of peace. Everything is very finely balanced - So choose wisely! ;D
My Leave journey is bright and sunny. You seem to be the one with very dark journeys.0 -
Turnout will be about 80% let's be frank. It'll be close to the Scottish election turnout. This is a big BIG deal.nunu said:Turnout is going to kill Remain according to yougov on a 53% turnout Leave win even with a 4% remain lead- turnout needs to be 71% for Remain to win.
0