Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Biden drops to FOURTH in Iowa in by far his worst poll of his

13567

Comments

  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,504

    Boris live on BBC with Laura

    He announces December 12th


    Sadly the timing of the election is not in his gift.
  • How are we getting quotes already??

    EDIT: Oh so he wants to pass the deal and then have an election. Not sure about that.

    https://twitter.com/paulbranditv/status/1187398348732555266?s=21
    https://twitter.com/paulbranditv/status/1187398350158647300?s=21

    He is live on BBC
  • Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,821
    edited October 2019

    How are we getting quotes already??

    EDIT: Oh so he wants to pass the deal and then have an election. Not sure about that.

    https://twitter.com/paulbranditv/status/1187398348732555266?s=21
    https://twitter.com/paulbranditv/status/1187398350158647300?s=21

    Pass the deal first? Labour now have a ready made excuse.

    Dear me.
    No, not pass the deal first - debate and either accept or reject the deal first.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,491
    I'm kind of tempted to let speculation do its work now and drive the price of December down to 1.15/1.2, and then lay it like a motherf*cker.
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 4,502
    Very interesting.

    Bozo has set a trap. He could get the deal and a GE straight after that if I’m understanding his interview correctly .

    Really Labour are in a horrible position . They can’t let the deal through and let him bask in the glory straight afterwards .
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936
    Hypothetical polls should be taken with a rather large grain of salt.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,468
    If Labour pass Brexit literally the moment before a GE campaign the Lib Dems will be licking their lips.
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,504

    So the plan is that either Boris goes to the country in triumph, having delivered a Brexit deal (albeit a rotten one), or he goes to the country on a 'rid me of these troublesome remainiacs who can't agree anything, and then I'll deliver'.

    Not a bad plan. Puts Labour in a very tricky position.
    Just don't vote for the election. Hold off until something comes up.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340

    If there is a 2019 election, @AlastairMeeks is gonna have some explaining to do...

    Other opinions were out there. That smart @David_herdson argued the opposite. Perhaps you should listen to him more.
  • Pro_RataPro_Rata Posts: 5,288
    12 Dec - 25 working = 6 Nov (1 Scottish BH).

    Or are we going below 25?
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,504

    I'm kind of tempted to let speculation do its work now and drive the price of December down to 1.15/1.2, and then lay it like a motherf*cker.

    Interesting gambit.
  • NooNoo Posts: 2,380
    Watching out for the SNP now... wondering whether they will put something in their manifesto along the lines of "majority of MPs = mandate for independence". Just to fuck things up a bit. Could throw the whole election into chaos if they do.
    If there is an election, that is.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936

    If Labour pass Brexit literally the moment before a GE campaign the Lib Dems will be licking their lips.

    Splitting the remain vote. And the Brexit coalition may only stick together if Brexit seems to be in threat. :)
  • Henry_CHenry_C Posts: 73

    How are we getting quotes already??

    EDIT: Oh so he wants to pass the deal and then have an election. Not sure about that.

    https://twitter.com/paulbranditv/status/1187398348732555266?s=21
    https://twitter.com/paulbranditv/status/1187398350158647300?s=21

    If the Tories fight the election on "Get Brexit Done" they could possibly come an almighty cropper. "Vote for us to deliver what we failed to come anywhere near delivering" isn't a good message.

    I think Alastair Campbell was on to something when he said Dominic Cummings has let it go to his head that he was played by Benedict Cumberbatch in such a big film. "Take Back Control" was brilliant. "Get Brexit Done" is awful. You're fighting the last war, Dom.
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,504
    RobD said:

    Hypothetical polls should be taken with a rather large grain of salt.
    "Oooh polls! Oh no, not those polls!"
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,806
    Mr. kle4, there's also a non-trivial chance we could get another hung Parliament.
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,504
    RobD said:

    All polls should be taken with a rather large grain of salt.
    Fixed.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,491

    How are we getting quotes already??

    EDIT: Oh so he wants to pass the deal and then have an election. Not sure about that.

    https://twitter.com/paulbranditv/status/1187398348732555266?s=21
    https://twitter.com/paulbranditv/status/1187398350158647300?s=21

    Pass the deal first? Labour now have a ready made excuse.

    Dear me.
    No, not pass the deal first - debate and either accept or reject the deal first.
    He'll get 288 Tories, and about 15 Independent Tories (if he promises to restore their whip) and the SNP. That gets him to about 338 votes.

    He needs 434, so about 96 Labour and/or LDs to party.

    I read somewhere that a good 140 Labour MPs had written to Corbyn saying, for heaven't sake, don't do it, so if he does it anyway, and the rest of his 245 MPs are loyal, it will be close.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936

    RobD said:

    Hypothetical polls should be taken with a rather large grain of salt.
    "Oooh polls! Oh no, not those polls!"
    Hypothetical polls are often viewed with derision on here, remember the hypothetical polling regarding Boris? I don't think I'm being inconsistent.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 54,627
    edited October 2019
    Ooh, are we actually going to get an election this time?

    (Checks betting slips)

    Yes please!
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,504
    nico67 said:

    Very interesting.

    Bozo has set a trap. He could get the deal and a GE straight after that if I’m understanding his interview correctly .

    Really Labour are in a horrible position . They can’t let the deal through and let him bask in the glory straight afterwards .

    Just make something up and don't vote for the election.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    RobD said:

    Hypothetical polls should be taken with a rather large grain of salt.
    Still rather interesting. I note the dates of the poll, but are there really millions of people who will self destruct on Brexit by switching to BXP, in the Hope's of getting Brexit?
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,468
    Boris fannying around with these conditions suggests he’s scared to fight a pre-Brexit election.

    Get it done Labour. This is it.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    I'm not entirely sure what's in it for Labour to accept this proposal. Surely the simple response of "just put the flipping bill down for consideration and stop messing around" is called for?

  • Just don't vote for the election. Hold off until something comes up.

    But then they potentially run up against No Deal again. And they are going to look completely clueless as well as disunited and dishonest (which they are, of course, but they need some at least vaguely plausible way of hiding it).
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,293
    Yeah but they won't pass it.

    Will just get bogged down with loads of amendements on customs unions and second referendums.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,215

    How are we getting quotes already??

    EDIT: Oh so he wants to pass the deal and then have an election. Not sure about that.

    https://twitter.com/paulbranditv/status/1187398348732555266?s=21
    https://twitter.com/paulbranditv/status/1187398350158647300?s=21

    Pass the deal first? Labour now have a ready made excuse.

    Dear me.
    No, not pass the deal first - debate and either accept or reject the deal first.
    He'll get 288 Tories, and about 15 Independent Tories (if he promises to restore their whip) and the SNP. That gets him to about 338 votes.

    He needs 434, so about 96 Labour and/or LDs to party.

    I read somewhere that a good 140 Labour MPs had written to Corbyn saying, for heaven't sake, don't do it, so if he does it anyway, and the rest of his 245 MPs are loyal, it will be close.
    Labour will all head one way or the other. The optics of being split on a vote like that are too horrific to even contemplate.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163

    If Labour pass Brexit literally the moment before a GE campaign the Lib Dems will be licking their lips.

    Indeed. They cannot let it pass, and if rebels look like seeing it through they need to act.
  • SunnyJimSunnyJim Posts: 1,106

    I'm not entirely sure what's in it for Labour to accept this proposal. Surely the simple response of "just put the flipping bill down for consideration and stop messing around" is called for?

    "just put the flipping bill down for consideration so we can start messing around"

    More like.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,468
    The problem is that anyone who would be on the “evil parliament blocking the will of the people” train is already on it.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    Oh how great, I'm heading to my corbynite extended family on the 12th, so how we all voted is sure to come up.
  • How are we getting quotes already??

    EDIT: Oh so he wants to pass the deal and then have an election. Not sure about that.

    https://twitter.com/paulbranditv/status/1187398348732555266?s=21
    https://twitter.com/paulbranditv/status/1187398350158647300?s=21

    Pass the deal first? Labour now have a ready made excuse.

    Dear me.
    No, not pass the deal first - debate and either accept or reject the deal first.
    He'll get 288 Tories, and about 15 Independent Tories (if he promises to restore their whip) and the SNP. That gets him to about 338 votes.

    He needs 434, so about 96 Labour and/or LDs to party.

    I read somewhere that a good 140 Labour MPs had written to Corbyn saying, for heaven't sake, don't do it, so if he does it anyway, and the rest of his 245 MPs are loyal, it will be close.
    BBC confirm Lib Dems will vote for
  • DadgeDadge Posts: 2,052
    edited October 2019
    Laura K has fallen into the trap of providing the PM a platform for his spin. A 12th Dec election is no more in his hands than a 31st Oct Brexit has been.

    I'm sure Labour will stick to its guns: no election called till after 31st Oct. So there won't be an election till after Xmas. I'm not convinced this is necessarily good for Labour. If we assume that Boris *doesn't* get Brexit over the line in the next few weeks - or if it's amended into BINO and then passed - a December election would suit Labour quite well.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,491
    Pulpstar said:

    How are we getting quotes already??

    EDIT: Oh so he wants to pass the deal and then have an election. Not sure about that.

    https://twitter.com/paulbranditv/status/1187398348732555266?s=21
    https://twitter.com/paulbranditv/status/1187398350158647300?s=21

    Pass the deal first? Labour now have a ready made excuse.

    Dear me.
    No, not pass the deal first - debate and either accept or reject the deal first.
    He'll get 288 Tories, and about 15 Independent Tories (if he promises to restore their whip) and the SNP. That gets him to about 338 votes.

    He needs 434, so about 96 Labour and/or LDs to party.

    I read somewhere that a good 140 Labour MPs had written to Corbyn saying, for heaven't sake, don't do it, so if he does it anyway, and the rest of his 245 MPs are loyal, it will be close.
    Labour will all head one way or the other. The optics of being split on a vote like that are too horrific to even contemplate.
    True.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,236

    148grss said:

    Why do people keep harping on about individual polls? Individual polls have wider MoE and house effects than just going with an aggregate, such as that done by Real Clear Politcs: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/ia/iowa_democratic_presidential_caucus-6731.html

    Because in this case it fits with an overall trend of Biden seen in 4 polls of Biden slipping back & the Mayor moving forward
    It's a little less clearcut than that - and Iowa in isolation is hardly determinative.

    Biden seems still to be holding his own in the rustbelt states... and this was interesting:
    https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/467283-poll-warren-leads-sanders-by-4-points-in-california
    While Warren was the top choice among female Democratic voters at 31 percent, she trailed Sanders by six points amongst Latino voters, and was behind Biden (30 percent), Sanders (20 percent) and Harris (16 percent) amongst black voters, polling at only 13 percent.

    “We may be seeing the earliest signs of a stall in Warren’s rise and that rests squarely with her low numbers among non-white respondents," Change Research co-founder Pat Reilly told the radio station. "Her base is clearly white people in general and white women in particular.”...


    Biden might crater after Iowa, but equally he might not.
    His policy stance (and Buttigieg's, FWIW) is for now considerably more popular with the electorate than those of Warren and Sanders (exemplified by the nearly three quarters backing the public option against only half the electorate wanting 'Medicare for All').
    Of course that probably shades the other way with the Democratic selectorate, but it does show that there is room for a moderate to win. And the problem is that there is no massively compelling alternative to Biden.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    293 vs 311 for Queens speech
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    Actually, Jeremy Corbyn's best gambit now would be to table a vote of no confidence for tomorrow.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936

    293 vs 311 for Queens speech

    Was that the main vote, or an amendment?
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 4,502
    On balance Labour must not pass the deal .

    Going into the election with the deal going through will give Johnson a huge boost .

    At least if the deal hasn’t gone through there’s s chance the Leave vote might still be split.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,491

    If there is a 2019 election, @AlastairMeeks is gonna have some explaining to do...

    Other opinions were out there. That smart @David_herdson argued the opposite. Perhaps you should listen to him more.
    DYOR always applies.

    Not to mention "manage your own risk" of predictions.

    The tip was still exceptional, and very profitable for those that followed it and understood it.
  • TabmanTabman Posts: 1,046
    kle4 said:

    RobD said:

    Hypothetical polls should be taken with a rather large grain of salt.
    Still rather interesting. I note the dates of the poll, but are there really millions of people who will self destruct on Brexit by switching to BXP, in the Hope's of getting Brexit?
    Never underestimate the intellectual ability of the electorate.
  • Whatever happens, I think connoisseurs of outlandish political spin and spectacular handbrake turns are in for a treat over the next few days.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936
    nico67 said:

    On balance Labour must not pass the deal .

    Going into the election with the deal going through will give Johnson a huge boost .

    At least if the deal hasn’t gone through there’s s chance the Leave vote might still be split.

    I think there's more risk of the leave vote splitting if there has been a deal. If it is secured, less reason to vote Tory.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,468
    nico67 said:

    On balance Labour must not pass the deal .

    Going into the election with the deal going through will give Johnson a huge boost .

    At least if the deal hasn’t gone through there’s s chance the Leave vote might still be split.

    Agreed. That’s Labour’s only reasonable play now I think. If their vote is going to be split, they need to make sure the Tory vote is too.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    Pro_Rata said:

    12 Dec - 25 working = 6 Nov (1 Scottish BH).

    Or are we going below 25?

    They are saying '7 Nov'......they wouldn't have forgotten the Scottish Bank Holiday would they?
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,236
  • NooNoo Posts: 2,380

    Actually, Jeremy Corbyn's best gambit now would be to table a vote of no confidence for tomorrow.

    pro: initiative
    con: gives up control of election timing
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,293

    Actually, Jeremy Corbyn's best gambit now would be to table a vote of no confidence for tomorrow.

    Parliament's not sitting tomorrow?
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,504
    RobD said:

    RobD said:

    Hypothetical polls should be taken with a rather large grain of salt.
    "Oooh polls! Oh no, not those polls!"
    Hypothetical polls are often viewed with derision on here, remember the hypothetical polling regarding Boris? I don't think I'm being inconsistent.
    All polls are hypothetical!
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    Noo said:

    Actually, Jeremy Corbyn's best gambit now would be to table a vote of no confidence for tomorrow.

    pro: initiative
    con: gives up control of election timing
    Another pro. Outside chance of Jeremy Corbyn getting into Downing Street.
  • If there is a 2019 election, @AlastairMeeks is gonna have some explaining to do...

    Other opinions were out there. That smart @David_herdson argued the opposite. Perhaps you should listen to him more.
    Just teasing. I basically agreed with your reasoning although I was less certain of it than you were. But yes, @david_herdson is always well worth listening to.
  • NooNoo Posts: 2,380
    Nigelb said:
    Two million quid? They really splashed out on that.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936

    RobD said:

    RobD said:

    Hypothetical polls should be taken with a rather large grain of salt.
    "Oooh polls! Oh no, not those polls!"
    Hypothetical polls are often viewed with derision on here, remember the hypothetical polling regarding Boris? I don't think I'm being inconsistent.
    All polls are hypothetical!
    I'll concede that point, lol :D
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,131
    kle4 said:

    Oh how great, I'm heading to my corbynite extended family on the 12th, so how we all voted is sure to come up.

    A Corbynite Maneuver, in fact.

    Pause.

    Ah, my shuttlecraft: how kind... :)
  • Ben Bradshaw will defy the whip and vote for a referendum not a GE
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936
    viewcode said:

    kle4 said:

    Oh how great, I'm heading to my corbynite extended family on the 12th, so how we all voted is sure to come up.

    A Corbynite Maneuver, in fact.

    Pause.

    Ah, my shuttlecraft: how kind... :)
    Definitely more elegant than the Johnson Maneuver. :)
  • NooNoo Posts: 2,380

    Noo said:

    Actually, Jeremy Corbyn's best gambit now would be to table a vote of no confidence for tomorrow.

    pro: initiative
    con: gives up control of election timing
    Another pro. Outside chance of Jeremy Corbyn getting into Downing Street.
    I admit that would be hilarious.
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,504
    Dadge said:

    Laura K has fallen into the trap of providing the PM a platform for his spin.

    You make this sound like a recent development.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,491

    Whatever happens, I think connoisseurs of outlandish political spin and spectacular handbrake turns are in for a treat over the next few days.

    I think the strategy is to publicly embarrass Labour into voting for an early election.
  • Prediction on Sky Boris will win the QS vote
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,468

    Ben Bradshaw will defy the whip and vote for a referendum not a GE

    So he can say in the GE, “I voted for a 2nd referendum — don’t blame me”.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,992
    Henry_C said:

    How are we getting quotes already??

    EDIT: Oh so he wants to pass the deal and then have an election. Not sure about that.

    https://twitter.com/paulbranditv/status/1187398348732555266?s=21
    https://twitter.com/paulbranditv/status/1187398350158647300?s=21

    If the Tories fight the election on "Get Brexit Done" they could possibly come an almighty cropper. "Vote for us to deliver what we failed to come anywhere near delivering" isn't a good message.

    I think Alastair Campbell was on to something when he said Dominic Cummings has let it go to his head that he was played by Benedict Cumberbatch in such a big film. "Take Back Control" was brilliant. "Get Brexit Done" is awful. You're fighting the last war, Dom.
    That is an extremely good point. Why should we trust you to deliver something you've committed to and failed to deliver for the past three years.

    If you think James Cleverly's "we'd have made good on our pledges had it not been for the pesky opposition" was droll, just wait until they face Andrew Neil having been asked that question.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    RobD said:

    293 vs 311 for Queens speech

    Was that the main vote, or an amendment?
    Corbyn amendment:

    https://twitter.com/PARLYapp/status/1187399048946470912?s=20

    Now voting on Blackford's 'don't end FoM'
  • Nigelb said:
    Brexit aside (or perhaps included) we are living through a golden era of government not having the votes to pass silly laws. Think how many pointless Criminal Justice Acts we’ve been spared since 2015.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,131
    Seven days to no-deal. Nobody has passed any legislation to stop it yet. Are we going to no-deal by accident?
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936

    RobD said:

    293 vs 311 for Queens speech

    Was that the main vote, or an amendment?
    Corbyn amendment:

    https://twitter.com/PARLYapp/status/1187399048946470912?s=20

    Now voting on Blackford's 'don't end FoM'
    OK, probably a good indicator for the government majority on the final vote.
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,504

    The problem is that anyone who would be on the “evil parliament blocking the will of the people” train is already on it.
    Too nuanced an analysis for the one-dimensional Goodwin.
  • PClippPClipp Posts: 2,138

    PClipp said:

    philiph said:

    https://order-order.com/2019/10/24/lib-dems-new-shameless-leaflet-claims/

    I know it is Guido, but the bit about Chukka is as audacious as any economically truthful quote could ever be.

    Chuka has also been bombarding innocent voters in Cities of London and Westminster with leaflets claiming it's between him and the Tories. This will be a surprise to the local Labour Party, which got 14,857 votes in 2017 compared with the LibDems' 4,270.
    Still, it's heartwarming to see that's he's fitting so well into his new party.
    You are talking about ancient history,Mr Navabi. The Euro elections are a much better guide to next time.
    Certainly that's what the LibDems would have you believe. I guess that means a BXP government?
    No, because the sensible Conservatives will fall in with the Liberal Democrats, as will the sensible Labourites. The rump of the old Conservative Party has already
    been taken over by fruitcakes and other nutters, and I don`t think people will fall for the Tory dirty tricks again.
  • blueblueblueblue Posts: 875

    nico67 said:

    On balance Labour must not pass the deal .

    Going into the election with the deal going through will give Johnson a huge boost .

    At least if the deal hasn’t gone through there’s s chance the Leave vote might still be split.

    Agreed. That’s Labour’s only reasonable play now I think. If their vote is going to be split, they need to make sure the Tory vote is too.
    Labour are screwed either way - either they're blocking a deal that in the eyes of the general public will Get Brexit Done At Bloody Last without a crash-out, or they have to fight Boris immediately after he has Gotten Brexit Done At Bloody Last.

    What they needed was for Boris to have to fight an election without having obtained a Deal - that was their only hope of victory.

    Instead, by trying so hard to screw Boris via the Benn Act, they ended up screwing themselves much harder. Beautiful poetic justice! :smiley:
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,131
    RobD said:

    viewcode said:

    kle4 said:

    Oh how great, I'm heading to my corbynite extended family on the 12th, so how we all voted is sure to come up.

    A Corbynite Maneuver, in fact.

    Pause.

    Ah, my shuttlecraft: how kind... :)
    Definitely more elegant than the Johnson Maneuver. :)
    :)
  • ArtistArtist Posts: 1,893
    It's the latest possible date this year so that's one incentive for Labour with a protracted election campaign.
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,293
    viewcode said:

    Seven days to no-deal. Nobody has passed any legislation to stop it yet. Are we going to no-deal by accident?

    Probably not (as EU will more than likely grant an exemption) but it is amazing how relaxed everyone is that we're just a week away from No Deal with absolutely no assurance that we're going to get a veto...
  • RobD said:

    293 vs 311 for Queens speech

    Was that the main vote, or an amendment?
    Corbyn amendment:

    https://twitter.com/PARLYapp/status/1187399048946470912?s=20

    Now voting on Blackford's 'don't end FoM'
    Labour abstaining apparently
  • viewcode said:

    Seven days to no-deal. Nobody has passed any legislation to stop it yet. Are we going to no-deal by accident?

    Not if as expected the EU extend A50 to 31st January
  • blueblue said:

    nico67 said:

    On balance Labour must not pass the deal .

    Going into the election with the deal going through will give Johnson a huge boost .

    At least if the deal hasn’t gone through there’s s chance the Leave vote might still be split.

    Agreed. That’s Labour’s only reasonable play now I think. If their vote is going to be split, they need to make sure the Tory vote is too.
    Labour are screwed either way - either they're blocking a deal that in the eyes of the general public will Get Brexit Done At Bloody Last without a crash-out, or they have to fight Boris immediately after he has Gotten Brexit Done At Bloody Last.

    What they needed was for Boris to have to fight an election without having obtained a Deal - that was their only hope of victory.

    Instead, by trying so hard to screw Boris via the Benn Act, they ended up screwing themselves much harder. Beautiful poetic justice! :smiley:
    But they will also have saved the country from the catastrophe of crashing out with no deal, as well as from the very likely consequent further catastrophe of a Corbyn or Corbyn-style government. So put it down to noble and principled self-sacrifice.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    Blackford falls 64 - 310
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,772
    V interesting poll in header.

    I have predicted before that Buttigieg will surprise in Iowa.
  • Henry_CHenry_C Posts: 73
    edited October 2019
    (deleted)
  • Henry_CHenry_C Posts: 73
    edited October 2019
    blueblue said:

    nico67 said:

    On balance Labour must not pass the deal .

    Going into the election with the deal going through will give Johnson a huge boost .

    At least if the deal hasn’t gone through there’s s chance the Leave vote might still be split.

    Agreed. That’s Labour’s only reasonable play now I think. If their vote is going to be split, they need to make sure the Tory vote is too.
    Labour are screwed either way - either they're blocking a deal that in the eyes of the general public will Get Brexit Done At Bloody Last without a crash-out, or they have to fight Boris immediately after he has Gotten Brexit Done At Bloody Last.

    What they needed was for Boris to have to fight an election without having obtained a Deal - that was their only hope of victory.

    Instead, by trying so hard to screw Boris via the Benn Act, they ended up screwing themselves much harder. Beautiful poetic justice! :smiley:
    I'm chuckling at the thought of Boris Johnson fighting an election saying he's just Got Brexit Done And Look How Great It Is. Good for Labour. As for the Tories saying Let's Get Brexit Done if they haven't managed to get it done in the three years they've been in office since the referendum? Also good for Labour.

    The Tories will fight the election on immigration, which for much of the population is what "Brexit" is code for anyway. They haven't got much else left.

  • humbuggerhumbugger Posts: 377
    Henry_C said:

    blueblue said:

    nico67 said:

    On balance Labour must not pass the deal .

    Going into the election with the deal going through will give Johnson a huge boost .

    At least if the deal hasn’t gone through there’s s chance the Leave vote might still be split.

    Agreed. That’s Labour’s only reasonable play now I think. If their vote is going to be split, they need to make sure the Tory vote is too.
    Labour are screwed either way - either they're blocking a deal that in the eyes of the general public will Get Brexit Done At Bloody Last without a crash-out, or they have to fight Boris immediately after he has Gotten Brexit Done At Bloody Last.

    What they needed was for Boris to have to fight an election without having obtained a Deal - that was their only hope of victory.

    Instead, by trying so hard to screw Boris via the Benn Act, they ended up screwing themselves much harder. Beautiful poetic justice! :smiley:
    I'm chuckling at the thought of Boris Johnson fighting an election saying he's just Got Brexit Done And Look How Great It Is. Good for Labour. As for the Tories saying Let's Get Brexit Done after they have been in office for three years since the referendum and haven't managed? Also good for Labour.

    The Tories will fight the election on immigration, which for much of the population is what "Brexit" is code for anyway. They haven't got much else left.
    Presumably you'll be encouraging Labour to vote for a GE then? And good afternoon everyone.
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,751
    Dadge said:
    So Johnson is now trying to get the EU to offer only a month's extension in the hope that he can put off an election until after Brexit?
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,772
    humbugger said:

    Henry_C said:

    blueblue said:

    nico67 said:

    On balance Labour must not pass the deal .

    Going into the election with the deal going through will give Johnson a huge boost .

    At least if the deal hasn’t gone through there’s s chance the Leave vote might still be split.

    Agreed. That’s Labour’s only reasonable play now I think. If their vote is going to be split, they need to make sure the Tory vote is too.
    Labour are screwed either way - either they're blocking a deal that in the eyes of the general public will Get Brexit Done At Bloody Last without a crash-out, or they have to fight Boris immediately after he has Gotten Brexit Done At Bloody Last.

    What they needed was for Boris to have to fight an election without having obtained a Deal - that was their only hope of victory.

    Instead, by trying so hard to screw Boris via the Benn Act, they ended up screwing themselves much harder. Beautiful poetic justice! :smiley:
    I'm chuckling at the thought of Boris Johnson fighting an election saying he's just Got Brexit Done And Look How Great It Is. Good for Labour. As for the Tories saying Let's Get Brexit Done after they have been in office for three years since the referendum and haven't managed? Also good for Labour.

    The Tories will fight the election on immigration, which for much of the population is what "Brexit" is code for anyway. They haven't got much else left.
    Presumably you'll be encouraging Labour to vote for a GE then? And good afternoon everyone.
    https://twitter.com/lewis_goodall/status/1187403937286148097
  • Henry_CHenry_C Posts: 73
    humbugger said:

    Henry_C said:

    blueblue said:

    nico67 said:

    On balance Labour must not pass the deal .

    Going into the election with the deal going through will give Johnson a huge boost .

    At least if the deal hasn’t gone through there’s s chance the Leave vote might still be split.

    Agreed. That’s Labour’s only reasonable play now I think. If their vote is going to be split, they need to make sure the Tory vote is too.
    Labour are screwed either way - either they're blocking a deal that in the eyes of the general public will Get Brexit Done At Bloody Last without a crash-out, or they have to fight Boris immediately after he has Gotten Brexit Done At Bloody Last.

    What they needed was for Boris to have to fight an election without having obtained a Deal - that was their only hope of victory.

    Instead, by trying so hard to screw Boris via the Benn Act, they ended up screwing themselves much harder. Beautiful poetic justice! :smiley:
    I'm chuckling at the thought of Boris Johnson fighting an election saying he's just Got Brexit Done And Look How Great It Is. Good for Labour. As for the Tories saying Let's Get Brexit Done after they have been in office for three years since the referendum and haven't managed? Also good for Labour.

    The Tories will fight the election on immigration, which for much of the population is what "Brexit" is code for anyway. They haven't got much else left.
    Presumably you'll be encouraging Labour to vote for a GE then? And good afternoon everyone.
    Yes indeed!
  • So if Boris gets all three legislation passed by 6 Nov, and wins an election (if it happens) we could be leaving EU on Friday 13th instead of Halloween!
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,237
    Betfair reaction - approx 60% chance that BoJo gets his Dec GE.

    My opinion, as per PT, Labour should block it.

    But it's Jez's opinion that counts.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,720
    Henry_C said:

    blueblue said:

    nico67 said:

    On balance Labour must not pass the deal .

    Going into the election with the deal going through will give Johnson a huge boost .

    At least if the deal hasn’t gone through there’s s chance the Leave vote might still be split.

    Agreed. That’s Labour’s only reasonable play now I think. If their vote is going to be split, they need to make sure the Tory vote is too.
    Labour are screwed either way - either they're blocking a deal that in the eyes of the general public will Get Brexit Done At Bloody Last without a crash-out, or they have to fight Boris immediately after he has Gotten Brexit Done At Bloody Last.

    What they needed was for Boris to have to fight an election without having obtained a Deal - that was their only hope of victory.

    Instead, by trying so hard to screw Boris via the Benn Act, they ended up screwing themselves much harder. Beautiful poetic justice! :smiley:
    I'm chuckling at the thought of Boris Johnson fighting an election saying he's just Got Brexit Done And Look How Great It Is. Good for Labour. As for the Tories saying Let's Get Brexit Done if they haven't managed to get it done in the three years they've been in office since the referendum? Also good for Labour.

    The Tories will fight the election on immigration, which for much of the population is what "Brexit" is code for anyway. They haven't got much else left.
    An election immediately after Brexit in which people discover we still have free movement wouldn't go well for the Conservatives.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,468
    edited October 2019
    This only matters if the EU don’t offer an extension until end of January. Otherwise it doesn’t matter anymore.

    https://twitter.com/woodstockjag/status/1187405222458601475?s=21
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,293

    humbugger said:

    Henry_C said:

    blueblue said:

    nico67 said:

    On balance Labour must not pass the deal .

    Going into the election with the deal going through will give Johnson a huge boost .

    At least if the deal hasn’t gone through there’s s chance the Leave vote might still be split.

    Agreed. That’s Labour’s only reasonable play now I think. If their vote is going to be split, they need to make sure the Tory vote is too.
    Labour are screwed either way - either they're blocking a deal that in the eyes of the general public will Get Brexit Done At Bloody Last without a crash-out, or they have to fight Boris immediately after he has Gotten Brexit Done At Bloody Last.

    What they needed was for Boris to have to fight an election without having obtained a Deal - that was their only hope of victory.

    Instead, by trying so hard to screw Boris via the Benn Act, they ended up screwing themselves much harder. Beautiful poetic justice! :smiley:
    I'm chuckling at the thought of Boris Johnson fighting an election saying he's just Got Brexit Done And Look How Great It Is. Good for Labour. As for the Tories saying Let's Get Brexit Done after they have been in office for three years since the referendum and haven't managed? Also good for Labour.

    The Tories will fight the election on immigration, which for much of the population is what "Brexit" is code for anyway. They haven't got much else left.
    Presumably you'll be encouraging Labour to vote for a GE then? And good afternoon everyone.
    https://twitter.com/lewis_goodall/status/1187403937286148097
    Within 12 months Con were back with a landslide and the Liberal party was obliterated for the rest of the 20th Century.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    rcs1000 said:

    Pulpstar said:

    rcs1000 said:

    DavidL said:

    Did we not see polling on the previous thread showing Warren dropping back with the effect that Biden was out front again (albeit not steaming ahead)? Think it might have been from Robert.

    That was national polling, where Biden was still on 27-28%, but that Warren had dropped from parity to the low 20s.

    Iowa is going to be crucial, because early results affect later ones.

    In 2008, Guiliani's approach was the "Florida Firewall". He campaigned almost exclusively there, because willing Florida would catapult him into a delegate lead should he win there.

    And at this stage in the 2008 promaries, he was on around 30%, with Mitt Romney and John McCain both registering 10% in Florida.

    In every poll before Iowa, Guiliani was leading - usually with significant double digit leads.

    Then Guiliani flopped in Iowa and then New Hampshire. And that was it. The mantle of leadership in Florida passed to Romney and McCain.
    You know who won Iowa in 2008 :) ?

    Mick Huckabee :D
    True that.

    And actually there are a remarkable number of similarities between Huckabee and Buttigieg.

    1. They're both pretty religious.
    2. They both have funny names.

    There are obviously loads more, but I don't have time to share them right now.
    3. A complex and effective skin care regime
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    Noo said:

    Nigelb said:
    Two million quid? They really splashed out on that.
    What a bunch of jerk offs.
This discussion has been closed.