Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » MPs back the deal but block the timetable

12345679»

Comments

  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    isam said:

    Conservative majority is now favourite for the next GE. Another case of hypothetical, pre campaign polls being reverse indicators, or will Boris buck the trend?

    It's always possible that the polls are wrong, but by underestimating the trouble Labour are in.
  • SunnyJimSunnyJim Posts: 1,106
    kle4 said:


    Except he seems to be giving up on getting in through.

    Letwin has given him the golden ticket.

    And amusingly Ollie realised it earlier today when he tweeted in panic before the votes.
  • PaulMPaulM Posts: 613

    In what sense are those responsibilities?
    Fair enough. How about you probably pick up an ongoing obligation to HMRC were you ever to leave the UK as you might be deemed UK domiciled.
  • KentRisingKentRising Posts: 2,917
    SunnyJim said:

    There will be a point where the middle class make a decision on their priorities.

    No deal Brexit is no longer a threat so for many I would think Corbyn will be much the bigger fear.
    Yes, the beauty of achieving a deal for Boris is that it keeps the Tories in play in southern constituencies scared of No Deal.
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,868
    Pulpstar said:

    Not sure he has the numbers - you really don't want to be relying on the likes of Lisa Nandy.
    A majority of 30 for the deal seems immense to me.

    Can't help wondering what would have happened if when he was elected nearly three months ago he had applied himself then and negotiated a similar deal. They would probably have been erecting the statues already. Why didn't he do that?
  • Yes, but they forget to mention the caveat that I wanted Cameron and Osborne back running things, or if they're not available David Gauke, Phil Hammond and Amber Rudd.
    You really do want to make sure the Tories never win again don't you.
  • KentRisingKentRising Posts: 2,917
    Chris said:

    A majority of 30 for the deal seems immense to me.

    Can't help wondering what would have happened if when he was elected nearly three months ago he had applied himself then and negotiated a similar deal. They would probably have been erecting the statues already. Why didn't he do that?
    Maybe Ireland and the EU were not so amenable to reopening the Withdrawal Agreement three months ago? The time pressure doesn't just work one way.
  • Thanks, that is consistent. In the hierarchy of voting I would be UK resident nationals > UK nationals temporarily overseas > long term foreign residents here > UK nationals long term overseas.

    Where we draw the line is arbitrary enough that I have no strong view, but think long term foreign residents should be treated at least as well as UK nationals long term overseas. I think we should phase out the differences between Commonwealth, EU and other foreign nationals voting rights too, possibly Irish too although that may be too controversial.
    I would certainly agree with that. I would also massively reduce the costs of becoming a UK citizen. There is absolutely no reason it should cost so much.
  • PaulM said:

    Fair enough. How about you probably pick up an ongoing obligation to HMRC were you ever to leave the UK as you might be deemed UK domiciled.
    Googling that brings up this case https://qz.com/1235688/thousands-of-qualified-people-cant-get-uk-citizenship-because-they-cant-afford-it/

    Lived in the UK since a baby, cant afford the £1k cost of citizenship. Why on earth does the government want to make £587 profit from registering one eligible child as a citizen.

    On your question I am far from a tax expert so will leave it at that for the evening, perhaps there is some tax responsibility.

  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,795
    Do we have to apply the PB Offset Rule to the election timetable, just as we do to Brexit passing?

    The simple truth is that the PB mood is always much more willing to pass Brexit than MPs are.

    Presumably any forecasts of a 2019 GE should be seen through a similar prism?
  • PaulMPaulM Posts: 613
    Pulpstar said:

    Not sure he has the numbers - you really don't want to be relying on the likes of Lisa Nandy.
    As an aside, I thought it interesting (as someone who has family in Wigan) that of the three safe Labour MPs in the borough, two voted for Johnson's deal (Nandy and Jo Platt in Leigh) and the other abstained (Yvonne Fovargue in Makerfield). I still doubt Wigan Borough would deviate from its traditions going back to WWI of voting for Labour MPs in huge numbers, but presumably they are a bit concerned.
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,868
    Pulpstar said:

    I assume the current bill dies if there is an election as it's a new session ?

    My guess is he'd allow scrutiny of the bill for the exit date of 31st January - there's probably legitimate things that need tidying up in there that don't alter the substance of the matter.
    Yes. Once he's won an election I think the urgency will disappear. I think it will be a January Brexit.
  • eekeek Posts: 29,520
    Dura_Ace said:

    Getting a grand out of a cash machine.
    He's in New Orleans and didn't like it much yesterday evening.
  • eggegg Posts: 1,749
    On topic, now what?

    Eggs eggscruciating analysis part two if no GE then confirmatory vote?

    i am not going to ask you the question would you like one, do you think it a good idea, or do you think it might happen. I am going to ask you do you think Dominic Cummings would be tempted by one?

    He won the last one against the odds. He knows he’s good at them.
    He now has the government machine at his disposal not against him, he’s clearly got much media too.
    He’s also got a weary electorate desperate to move on to domestic agenda on his side. Surely he would be thinking he Will add to 17.4M not lose much from that?
    We know vast amount of Labour support is remain, vast amount of Labour members remain, vast amount of its MPs remain, but, and this is how Cummings thinks, they are offered confirmatory ref tomorrow, it blows them up into a civil war; not only that, when they lose the confirmatory ref and the country brexits Labour ceases to exist and never comes back from it.

    Where in Cummings war game, especially after trying and failing for GE, does he have confirmatory ref?
  • eggegg Posts: 1,749
    Eggs eggscruciating analysis part one the General Election

    I don’t think Boris will get a GE under `fTPA anytime soon because

    labour. I don’t feel they all want one. Even if some at top want one In short or medium term I think vociferous support against will stop them.
    Libdems and SNP. They could put on seats. But the flip side is massive win for Boris so he can ram through his Brexit and domestic policy. The GE and Boris majority wouldn’t help their brexit fight one bit.
    Remain Parliament. Surely remain now have Boris and his deal where they want it? Even if Boris is right and we do leave under his deal, it may say this is Boris brexit at top of paper, but it can dramatically change under that. So what really good reason would remain Parliament have for surrendering that influence.

    Certainly it looks like Boris and Cummings and their friends throughout media will now try to exert as much pressure to get one, but I don’t see them getting anywhere near enough votes in parliament under current law.
  • edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,716
    Chris said:

    A majority of 30 for the deal seems immense to me.

    Can't help wondering what would have happened if when he was elected nearly three months ago he had applied himself then and negotiated a similar deal. They would probably have been erecting the statues already. Why didn't he do that?

    The ERG would have voted against it. The way he got their support was by creating a huge tribal divide where the whole Leave side were cheering him on against a common enemy, so when he brought back a deal they put scoring a victory over the Remoners above their own policy preferences, like the UK having a single market.
  • Beibheirli_CBeibheirli_C Posts: 8,192
    Dura_Ace said:

    Getting a grand out of a cash machine.
    I had forgotten about that. When is WilliamGlenn due to collect his winnings ;)
  • SunnyJimSunnyJim Posts: 1,106
    egg said:


    Where in Cummings war game, especially after trying and failing for GE, does he have confirmatory ref?

    Cummings has his foot on Labour's throat, even if they don't realise it.

    A confirmatory ref would let them off the hook.
  • blueblueblueblue Posts: 875
    egg said:

    Eggs eggscruciating analysis part one the General Election

    I don’t think Boris will get a GE under `fTPA anytime soon because

    labour. I don’t feel they all want one. Even if some at top want one In short or medium term I think vociferous support against will stop them.
    Libdems and SNP. They could put on seats. But the flip side is massive win for Boris so he can ram through his Brexit and domestic policy. The GE and Boris majority wouldn’t help their brexit fight one bit.
    Remain Parliament. Surely remain now have Boris and his deal where they want it? Even if Boris is right and we do leave under his deal, it may say this is Boris brexit at top of paper, but it can dramatically change under that. So what really good reason would remain Parliament have for surrendering that influence.

    Certainly it looks like Boris and Cummings and their friends throughout media will now try to exert as much pressure to get one, but I don’t see them getting anywhere near enough votes in parliament under current law.

    Boris can go on TV every single day - the news will have him on because he is, y'know, the Prime Minister - and say "Parliament is sabotaging my Deal. I need a majority to pass it, and therefore I need an election. Jeremy Corbyn is blocking one, because he is a ******* coward who knows he will lose".

    Rinse and repeat, every single day until an election is called. The longer it continues, the more discredited Corbyn becomes, and the more disheartened his supporters feel. Win-win!
  • blueblueblueblue Posts: 875
    Chris said:

    Anyway, from a betting point of view, if there's an election in early December and Johnson gets a working majority, do people think he'll still be mad keen to get Brexit done within a few days, or will he adopt a more leirsurely approach and leave next year?

    Ironically, I think the Bill will then receive full scrutiny, since the Government can safely repel any wrecking amendments. All the poor governance of the last few years is a direct result of the muddled result of GE2017, and I hope to God the voters will take note this time and return a clear Conservative majority.
  • eggegg Posts: 1,749
    blueblue said:

    Boris can go on TV every single day - the news will have him on because he is, y'know, the Prime Minister - and say "Parliament is sabotaging my Deal. I need a majority to pass it, and therefore I need an election. Jeremy Corbyn is blocking one, because he is a ******* coward who knows he will lose".

    Rinse and repeat, every single day until an election is called. The longer it continues, the more discredited Corbyn becomes, and the more disheartened his supporters feel. Win-win!
    Would you like to have a guess at the date of the general election?
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,771
    edited October 2019

    I expect Boris to call it immediately he receives Tusk letter confirming a flexi extension to 31st January. As that is likely tomorrow Boris calls it on Thursday and GE on 28th November

    And Boris campaign will be elect me and we leave the EU on the 31st December. Clear and no prevarication. Powerful message
    One thing, they won't need an extended period for Parliamentary "wash up" as bugger all has been happening in Parliament for months. :D
  • SunnyJimSunnyJim Posts: 1,106
    Looking at the ex-Tories who voted against the Timetable:

    Milton
    Sandbach
    Stewart
    Bebb
    Clarke
    Greening
    Grieve
    Hammond
    Harrington

    At least 3 of those who may have hoped for a reprieve have been stitched up by Letwin's folly.

  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 59,031
    AndyJS said:

    I'm not convinced the Tories will win an easy majority at a GE. They could lose loads of seats in the home counties and SW London to the LDs like Guildford and Wimbledon. The polls may not be a good guide because the Conservatives could be piling up huge majorities in their safe seats in the SW, Midlands, Yorkshire, etc.

    Hmmm: I suspect the opposite *could* be true. Take Wimbledon. I could easily see the Conservatives holding on with 35% of the vote, as the "pro EU" opposition splits between LD, Lab and Green.

  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527

    I expect Boris to call it immediately he receives Tusk letter confirming a flexi extension to 31st January. As that is likely tomorrow Boris calls it on Thursday and GE on 28th November

    And Boris campaign will be elect me and we leave the EU on the 31st December. Clear and no prevarication. Powerful message
    Too late now I think. An election on 28th November requires Dissolution on 24th October - which in turn requires a 2/3 vote in Parliament on 23rd October . Such a vote would have to be tabled on 22nd October. No longer possible - so first Thursday is really 5th December now.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,281
    I know it's one poll, and it's YouGov (which tends to show the Tories with stronger leads than other pollsters) but some of the breakouts are striking:

    Tory Lead:
    GB: +15
    ABC1: +13
    C2DE: +17

    Among ABC1 LD ahead of Lab (24 vs 22) while among C2DE LD on 12, vs Lab on 22.

    There is a similar picture on 'Best PM':

    Johnson lead:
    GB: +23
    ABC1: +18
    C2DE: +30

    Tory lead:
    18-24: -10
    25-49: -4
    50-64: +22
    65+: +44

    The Con vote is now slightly 'stickier' than the LD vote:

    % 2017 voters VI same now (ie 73% of those who voted Con in 17 have Con VI now):
    Con: 73
    Lab: 53
    LD: 69

    https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/mh2qgto87a/TheTimes_191021_VI_Trackers_w.pdf
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 44,617
    viewcode said:

    I was trying to be funny. The saying "oh, ask your mother" is a humorous way of saying that something happened a long time ago. My use of the phrase was meant to emphasise the fact that the time of Labour leads was many years ago.
    FPT - thank you, I've learned two new things now, and no offence taken at all!
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,994
    nichomar said:

    I have every right to care about what happens in the UK because it will affect my and my children’s rights, the UK do not send me a penny that I haven’t earned or contributed to over the years. I think having paid x,xxx,xxx in tax in my working life I have a right to my £140/week pension as much as anyone. If We all had to come back to the UK I think we might bugger a few things up.
    Exactly and a very poor return you et for the largesse you provided to these chisellers
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,924
    And the Labour whips have reportedly advised Jeremy Corbyn that if he supports an early general election he will not have enough Labour MPs on his side. Around 140 Labour MPs have reportedly told whips they would vote no to early election

    Any that vote no should not be eligible to stand as Lab Candidates
This discussion has been closed.