Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Blow for BoJo as CON MPs and ministers rebel on a measure that

12467

Comments

  • kjhkjh Posts: 11,815

    kjh said:

    kjh said:

    kjh said:

    Cicero said:

    nico67 said:

    Interesting to see Tories who were never seen as part of the awkward squad voting against the government .

    years.

    nutters I guess
    In all seriousness if I were a Tory MP (I never will be) even as a determined Leaver and someone who would always choose No Deal over Remain were that the final choice, I would have voted for this amendment. There are some very basic principles involved and suspending Parliament just to prevent them doing their job is so far from acceptable as to override even the risks that this might derail Brexit.
    👍
    That is my view

    Despite HYFUD and Viceroy comments telling us to clear off to the Lib Dems we will remain and fight the ultras who think they can take us into some dark age and economic armageddon
    In the nicest possible way there are a number of you on here whom I struggle to understand why you/they are not in the LDs Those that I am thinking of really have views that are pretty well indistinguishable from mine (or am I in the wrong party?)
    Probably TBP if you agree with Viceroy but the conservative party has to be a broad church
    Oh BGNW I obviously worded that badly. I'm a LD. A shudder went down my back when I read that.

    What I meant was we have an awful lot in in common as I do with a number of other moderate sensible Tories on here and I really don't feel like I am in the wrong party.

    To quote HYFD however I am a 'lefty', something I don't think I have ever been called before.
    Looks like I misunderstood you and did not know you are a LD.

    I am more to the centre left of the conservative party and I do believe the coalition was an excellent government

    However, I do support Brexit even though I voted remain and believe we should have accepted TM deal. I reject no deal under all circumstances and am pleased that my party's responsible mps voted today to stop the proroguing of the HOC
    N problem. I obviously haven't made my mark here then even though I've been in and out since the very beginning :wink:

    Agree on coalition.

    We do differ on Brexit however. I think it has to be killed stone dead.
    And I respect your view and the Lib Dems are reaping the benefits of being honest, as are the SNP
    Cheers. Good luck with your battle within the Conservative party, but if not successful you will always be welcome this side of the fence.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156
    edited July 2019
    kinabalu said:

    nico67 said:

    As Trump descends further into the gutter how does the future PM deal with this .

    The disgusting scenes at his rally last night mean a UK PM being seen to be too close to Trump could seriously harm their appeal .

    Indeed a simple re hash of the infamous Tory poster but this time with Bozo in Trumps pocket could suffice !

    Just when you think he cannot get any uglier he does just that.

    Big test of the American people coming up next year.

    Nothing is more important than that they prove up to it. I have to believe they will be.
    With Salvini's Lega Nord still on 36% and 12.5% ahead of the 2nd placed Democratic Party in the latest Italian poll this week and Bolsonaro having been elected President in Brazil last year, the idea that Trump is somehow unique is not correct. Indeed we voted for Brexit before Trump arrived


    https://www.notizieoggi24.it/2019/07/18/sondaggi-elettorali-piepoli-la-lega-aumenta-nonostante-il-caso-russia/
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163

    HYUFD you do NOT represent the whole of your party. You are, in my view, an extremist and at the moment you make the most noise.

    But 1/3rd of Tory voters are Remainers and you would do very, very, well not to forget this.

    Indeed - vast majority of my friends (in SE) are effectively Tory remainers; and none of them voted for the Tories in the recent Euro elections
    That's good, since apparently there is nothing more Tory than not voting Tory at the Euros, given how many of those who backed the BXP party believe they are still the one true tories,
  • DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    DavidL said:

    How much longer are they intending to drag out this Tory leadership campaign? It's been two candidates forever. The tail end of the current administration with Theresa pretending to be relevant and Hammond running around defecating on the carpets to spite the next incumbent is deeply unnecessary and life support needs to be shut off stat.

    Result next wednesday but hustings have finished. It has gone on far too long
    Thank the Lord for that. What on earth was it in aid of? When there were plenty of candidates one could see the point.
    It might have been more tolerable had the result not been such a foregone conclusion. As it is the zombie government of May has staggered on to yet more defeats and little purpose.
    The point was to run the contest right up to the recess to avoid the new PM being VONC'd in his first week. Even now, the result is to be dragged out: votes counted Monday; announced Tuesday; Palace Wednesday; recess Thursday.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,406



    I prefer the Miliverse. But basically any version of reality would be better than this one.

    I wonder what the universe where a panda (insert other cute animal here) rather than a weasel was found in cern is like?
  • DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    Any betting markets on Theresa May's resignation honours list?
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,698
    edited July 2019

    kjh said:

    kjh said:

    Cicero said:

    nico67 said:

    That is my view

    Despite HYFUD and Viceroy comments telling us to clear off to the Lib Dems we will remain and fight the ultras who think they can take us into some dark age and economic armageddon
    In the nicest possible way there are a number of you on here whom I struggle to understand why you/they are not in the LDs Those that I am thinking of really have views that are pretty well indistinguishable from mine (or am I in the wrong party?)
    Probably TBP if you agree with Viceroy but the conservative party has to be a broad church
    Oh BGNW I obviously worded that badly. I'm a LD. A shudder went down my back when I read that.

    What I meant was we have an awful lot in in common as I do with a number of other moderate sensible Tories on here and I really don't feel like I am in the wrong party.

    To quote HYFD however I am a 'lefty', something I don't think I have ever been called before.
    Looks like I misunderstood you and did not know you are a LD.

    I am more to the centre left of the conservative party and I do believe the coalition was an excellent government

    However, I do support Brexit even though I voted remain and believe we should have accepted TM deal. I reject no deal under all circumstances and am pleased that my party's responsible mps voted today to stop the proroguing of the HOC
    The nutters will still try No Deal. No Deal needs a wooden stake through the heart....
    Today has seen a positive move towards that but it is also important that no deakl's opposite, remain, is put to bed by passing a WDA
    I take issue with that Big_G... Remain got 48% of the EUref vote - how much did No Deal get?

    Remain is only No Deal's opposite in the sense that good sense is utter madness's opposite.
    And in the middle is upholding a democratic vote to leave the EU

    The correct course is to leave with a deal and then the opponents to leave campaign to rejoin.

    To me that is democracy
    Well, even though I am a Remainer through and through I'd have been ok with May's deal. But the anti-EU extremists scuppered that.

    Now we seem to be faced with the choice between No Deal and Remain. Fine - let's put it to the country.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163

    eek said:

    TGOHF said:

    philiph said:

    Tory Party is unmanageable right now. That makes an election more likely as time passes.

    This. All these priggish troublemakers fade into insignificance if you have a large majority.

    Still looks like the remain "squad" will get the blame if we don't leave on 31st October.

    An election in that scenario should be decisive.
    I suspect it won't be. Remain will pick up a few seats, Labour will win more than expected because a referendum is neither here nor there and the Tories will be roughly the same (say -10 to 20 or so seats).

    And Parliament would be even more screwed...
    100% wrong. It will be the "who governs Britain - the voters or the MPs?" election.
    Am I alone in thinking that is always a very stupid question?
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869

    kjh said:

    kjh said:

    Cicero said:

    nico67 said:

    The genuine Conservatives are finally losing it with the nutters I guess
    In all seriousness if I were a Tory MP (I never will be.
    👍
    That is my view

    Despite HYFUD and Viceroy comments telling us to clear off to the Lib Dems we will remain and fight the ultras who think they can take us into some dark age and economic armageddon
    In the nicest possible way there are a number of you on here whom I struggle to understand why you/they are not in the LDs Those that I am thinking of really have views that are pretty well indistinguishable from mine (or am I in the wrong party?)
    Probably TBP if you agree with Viceroy but the conservative party has to be a broad church
    Oh BGNW I obviously worded that badly. I'm a LD. A shudder went down my back when I read that.

    What I meant was we have an awful lot in in common as I do with a number of other moderate sensible Tories on here and I really don't feel like I am in the wrong party.

    To quote HYFD however I am a 'lefty', something I don't think I have ever been called before.
    Looks like I misunderstood you and did not know you are a LD.

    I am more to the centre left of the conservative party and I do believe the coalition was an excellent government

    However, I do support Brexit even though I voted remain and believe we should have accepted TM deal. I reject no deal under all circumstances and am pleased that my party's responsible mps voted today to stop the proroguing of the HOC
    The nutters will still try No Deal. No Deal needs a wooden stake through the heart....
    Today has seen a positive move towards that but it is also important that no deakl's opposite, remain, is put to bed by passing a WDA
    I take issue with that Big_G... Remain got 48% of the EUref vote - how much did No Deal get?

    Remain is only No Deal's opposite in the sense that good sense is utter madness's opposite.
    And in the middle is upholding a democratic vote to leave the EU

    The correct course is to leave with a deal and then the opponents to leave campaign to rejoin.

    To me that is democracy
    Or avoid all that disruption and hassle and ask people whether they want the deal or not, beforehand.
  • MikeSmithsonMikeSmithson Posts: 7,382
    Test
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,572

    nico67 said:

    nico67 said:

    It’s quite astonishing to see what has happened today .

    Dominic Grieves original amendment which was much weaker than this scraped home by one vote .

    The Lords then added an amendment , this was strengthened today and it passed by 41 votes !

    All this could have been avoided by a simple no to suspend Parliament by Johnson . So in effect he’s forced this issue and the symbolism of such a rebellion amongst the Tories puts a marker down .

    I really do think the Tories have badly misjudged this Leadership , there’s no chance Bozo can unite the party .

    Gove for all his faults could have done that , the fact he remained loyal to May and did at least try to hold out an olive branch to the more pro EU wing of the party .

    I just can’t see how this ends well.

    Brexit cannot now be resolved by compromise. It could have been had T May gone down that route in 2016 but now both sides are too deeply entrenched. As Bozo said, it's do or die. And both his premiership and Brexit are going to die.
    The thing is so many forecasts of what might happen have ended up not being realized . If someone had told me in early March we’d still be in the EU in the summer I wouldn’t have believed it .

    Nothing would shock me anymore .
    It's clear that parliament will not countenance no deal and it's also clear that the EU will not change May's deal in any meaningful way. Bozo has set his face so strongly against that deal that he could not credibly recommend anything resembling it to the HoC. So it will not be no deal, it will not be the only deal on offer, ergo it will be remain, probably disguised as another A50 extension initially.
    Missing the obvious point that, short of actually getting rid of Boris, Parliament cannot stop a No Deal. And as we have seen before, when it really comes to the crunch votes, the Anti- No Deal side generally seem to come up short.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,676
    rcs1000 said:
    Last Weekends Survation

    LAB 297
    CON 160
    LD 67
    BXP 66
    SNP 38
    GRN 1
    DUP 10
    SF 8
    PC 3
    Jezza + SNP Maj. Right wingers 226 Remain whingers 67
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,698

    Test

    Passed!
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163


    Quite frankly te difference between having 'an elected representative [responsible] for the direction that policing takes in your area' and a Police Committee consisting of councillors seems to be that under the former we have less police on the streets, and generally speaking they are less effective.

    I find it more baffling since at least in my area there is still a police committee consisting of councillors which scrutinises the PCC's actions, so I don't see that all that much has been added by making the latter the responsible one.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,617
    kle4 said:

    eek said:

    TGOHF said:

    philiph said:

    Tory Party is unmanageable right now. That makes an election more likely as time passes.

    This. All these priggish troublemakers fade into insignificance if you have a large majority.

    Still looks like the remain "squad" will get the blame if we don't leave on 31st October.

    An election in that scenario should be decisive.
    I suspect it won't be. Remain will pick up a few seats, Labour will win more than expected because a referendum is neither here nor there and the Tories will be roughly the same (say -10 to 20 or so seats).

    And Parliament would be even more screwed...
    100% wrong. It will be the "who governs Britain - the voters or the MPs?" election.
    Am I alone in thinking that is always a very stupid question?
    It shouldn't need asking. But it does right now.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 22,847
    edited July 2019
    I think the bigger reason to leave is that remain will be a very unstable and uncomfortable place to be, we would likely be one GE or one recession away from a no deal and a Brexit party govt. That is not a place long term businesses will enjoy investing in.

    If we could start from 2014 remain would be the best option, from where we are I agree with BigG that something along the lines of WA is least bad.

    If Boris calls an election and narrowly loses, no idea what Corbyn, his party, SNP and LDs could all agree on. We could get a mirror image govt mess for another couple of years.
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,698

    nico67 said:

    nico67 said:

    It’s quite astonishing to see what has happened today .

    Dominic Grieves original amendment which was much weaker than this scraped home by one vote .

    The Lords then added an amendment , this was strengthened today and it passed by 41 votes !

    All this could have been avoided by a simple no to suspend Parliament by Johnson . So in effect he’s forced this issue and the symbolism of such a rebellion amongst the Tories puts a marker down .

    I really do think the Tories have badly misjudged this Leadership , there’s no chance Bozo can unite the party .

    Gove for all his faults could have done that , the fact he remained loyal to May and did at least try to hold out an olive branch to the more pro EU wing of the party .

    I just can’t see how this ends well.

    Brexit cannot now be resolved by compromise. It could have been had T May gone down that route in 2016 but now both sides are too deeply entrenched. As Bozo said, it's do or die. And both his premiership and Brexit are going to die.
    The thing is so many forecasts of what might happen have ended up not being realized . If someone had told me in early March we’d still be in the EU in the summer I wouldn’t have believed it .

    Nothing would shock me anymore .
    It's clear that parliament will not countenance no deal and it's also clear that the EU will not change May's deal in any meaningful way. Bozo has set his face so strongly against that deal that he could not credibly recommend anything resembling it to the HoC. So it will not be no deal, it will not be the only deal on offer, ergo it will be remain, probably disguised as another A50 extension initially.
    Missing the obvious point that, short of actually getting rid of Boris, Parliament cannot stop a No Deal. And as we have seen before, when it really comes to the crunch votes, the Anti- No Deal side generally seem to come up short.
    That's what makes the next three and a half months so fascinating! :wink:
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,208
    This vote has delivered a big hit to Johnson's authority, I think. He is at peak leverage right now. Everyone expects him to be next prime minister, Conservative MPs are looking to his patronage but haven't yet been disappointed in getting the jobs they want.

    Despite that, Johnson lost badly. He won't win any election if he gets the reputation of not being in control.
  • anothernickanothernick Posts: 3,591

    nico67 said:

    nico67 said:

    It’s quite astonishing to see what has happened today .

    Dominic Grieves original amendment which was much weaker than this scraped home by one vote .

    The Lords then added an amendment , this was strengthened today and it passed by 41 votes !

    All this could have been avoided by a simple no to suspend Parliament by Johnson . So in effect he’s forced this issue and the symbolism of such a rebellion amongst the Tories puts a marker down .

    I really do think the Tories have badly misjudged this Leadership , there’s no chance Bozo can unite the party .

    Gove for all his faults could have done that , the fact he remained loyal to May and did at least try to hold out an olive branch to the more pro EU wing of the party .

    I just can’t see how this ends well.

    Brexit cannot now be resolved by compromise. It could have been had T May gone down that route in 2016 but now both sides are too deeply entrenched. As Bozo said, it's do or die. And both his premiership and Brexit are going to die.
    The thing is so many forecasts of what might happen have ended up not being realized . If someone had told me in early March we’d still be in the EU in the summer I wouldn’t have believed it .

    Nothing would shock me anymore .
    It's clear that parliament will not countenance no deal and it's also clear that the EU will not change May's deal in any meaningful way. Bozo has set his face so strongly against that deal that he could not credibly recommend anything resembling it to the HoC. So it will not be no deal, it will not be the only deal on offer, ergo it will be remain, probably disguised as another A50 extension initially.
    Missing the obvious point that, short of actually getting rid of Boris, Parliament cannot stop a No Deal. And as we have seen before, when it really comes to the crunch votes, the Anti- No Deal side generally seem to come up short.
    Today was proxy no deal vote. Had it been a genuine no deal vote many of the Tories who abstained would have voted against and the majority against no deal would have been close to 100.
  • The_TaxmanThe_Taxman Posts: 2,979

    kjh said:

    kjh said:

    Cicero said:

    nico67 said:

    Interesting to see Tories who were never seen as part of the awkward squad voting against the government .

    Keith Simpson never figured in anyone’s calculations . He’s never rebelled before in 22 years.

    The genuine Conservatives are finally losing it with the nutters I guess
    👍
    That is my view

    Despite HYFUD and Viceroy comments telling us to clear off to the Lib Dems we will remain and fight the ultras who think they can take us into some dark age and economic armageddon
    Probably TBP if you agree with Viceroy but the conservative party has to be a broad church
    Oh BGNW I obviously worded that badly. I'm a LD. A shudder went down my back when I read that.

    What I meant was we have an awful lot in in common as I do with a number of other moderate sensible Tories on here and I really don't feel like I am in the wrong party.

    To quote HYFD however I am a 'lefty', something I don't think I have ever been called before.
    Looks like I misunderstood you and did not know you are a LD.

    I am more to the centre left of the conservative party and I do believe the coalition was an excellent government

    However, I do support Brexit even though I voted remain and believe we should have accepted TM deal. I reject no deal under all circumstances and am pleased that my party's responsible mps voted today to stop the proroguing of the HOC
    The nutters will still try No Deal. No Deal needs a wooden stake through the heart....
    Today has seen a positive move towards that but it is also important that no deal's opposite, remain, is put to bed by passing a WDA
    Not so sure about that as any Brexit is worse economically than remain. Immigration is just going to increase from outside Europe as wages will be much higher in the UK than Pakistan, India or Africa for instance. Businesses that sell into the EU will still have to conform to EU standards which probably means suppliers to that market who sell in the UK market will have the same features. I dont see any point in deminishing the UK economically or politically for little gain. 17.4 million people may have voted for Brexit but 50 million UK citizens did not. Given this and the negative economic impact of Brexit suggests to me another referendum.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,406

    I think the bigger reason to leave is that remain will be a very unstable and uncomfortable place to be, we would likely be one GE or one recession away from a no deal and a Brexit party govt. That is not a place long term businesses will enjoy investing in.

    If we could start from 2014 remain would be the best option, from where we are I agree with BigG that something along the lines of WA is least bad.

    If Boris calls an election and narrowly loses, no idea what Corbyn, his party, SNP and LDs could all agree on. We could get a mirror image govt mess for another couple of years.

    Even Corbyn's labour is largely remain so I suspect you would have a renegotiation to some variation of Norway followed by a Norway v remain referendum..
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    That is very well said. One can question his own motives (and though he is not one of them, the hardcore remainiacs should not be allowed to get away with being extreme and self righteous just because people like that they are for remain), but the contempt for any rule, institution or convention of the Tories now I find bizarre given what they believe about themselves. It's no different to someone believing it impossible they could be racist because they are a good person, these people believe they care about various things but their actions state otherwise.

    Of course, judge people by their actions and an awful lot of people claim to be for Brexit but spend most of their time voting against it then blaming others for us not having left.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,237
    nico67 said:

    I hope you’re right . Trump is a cancer not just on the USA but the world . Soon his baying mob will be shouting string her up . These are very dark times for the USA , and by extension the rest of us . Trump is enabling a new very ugly type of politics.

    Agree with every word except "new".

    We have seen this before all too often.

    What's new is seeing it in the White House. Truly shocking. And scary.
  • RecidivistRecidivist Posts: 4,679
    HYUFD said:
    If only there were some way that people could work out the best tactical vote to maximise the chances of Tories not getting in.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,406

    HYUFD said:
    If only there were some way that people could work out the best tactical vote to maximise the chances of Tories not getting in.
    I'm sure they would be.
    Equally I'm happy to trade my Lib Dem vote up here for a Labour vote in the South West.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869

    You know, I peeked into the 'other' PB.com a little while ago. Goodness, what a civilised place that was compared to here.

    SeanT is still there, ranting admittedly but still there. TSE is still got a raging..... well, he still likes Cameron. And the discussions are civil. All the talk is about how Osborne is the shoe in against May. He basically got to pick his opponent, and Theresa May, well she might've been okay as Home Secretary but as PM material she'll never beat the Boy Wonder.

    Announcement of that Leadership contest is during Conference season and its widely expected Osborne will win, win handily and then go on to beat Corbyn in 2020 for his majority. Sure, Farage and UKIP are still a threat but three years later after the 52% Remain win, the country is moving on.

    And Osborne's win next year will mean the end of Corbyn and hopefully the Labour party can get back on its feet again. There's talk Benn or Watson will take over, or even Ed make a return.

    Of course, the Lib Dems are still struggling on 10%, but Farron can't have it all.


    What a civilised place that place is!

    They could do a remake of the Man in the High Castle set in Brexitlandia 2030 where people can travel between that reality and a different world in which Remain won.

    The better alternative reality is the one where Cameron realised how historic and valuable an opportunity the coalition presented him with, and he acted to accommodate rather than destroy his coalition partners.

    They are still in power, and there was no referendum.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,572

    You know, I peeked into the 'other' PB.com a little while ago. Goodness, what a civilised place that was compared to here.

    SeanT is still there, ranting admittedly but still there. TSE is still got a raging..... well, he still likes Cameron. And the discussions are civil. All the talk is about how Osborne is the shoe in against May. He basically got to pick his opponent, and Theresa May, well she might've been okay as Home Secretary but as PM material she'll never beat the Boy Wonder.

    Announcement of that Leadership contest is during Conference season and its widely expected Osborne will win, win handily and then go on to beat Corbyn in 2020 for his majority. Sure, Farage and UKIP are still a threat but three years later after the 52% Remain win, the country is moving on.

    And Osborne's win next year will mean the end of Corbyn and hopefully the Labour party can get back on its feet again. There's talk Benn or Watson will take over, or even Ed make a return.

    Of course, the Lib Dems are still struggling on 10%, but Farron can't have it all.


    What a civilised place that place is!

    They could do a remake of the Man in the High Castle set in Brexitlandia 2030 where people can travel between that reality and a different world in which Remain won.
    There would be a lot of refugees desperately trying to escape from Remainica to Brexitlandia
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 22,847
    eek said:

    I think the bigger reason to leave is that remain will be a very unstable and uncomfortable place to be, we would likely be one GE or one recession away from a no deal and a Brexit party govt. That is not a place long term businesses will enjoy investing in.

    If we could start from 2014 remain would be the best option, from where we are I agree with BigG that something along the lines of WA is least bad.

    If Boris calls an election and narrowly loses, no idea what Corbyn, his party, SNP and LDs could all agree on. We could get a mirror image govt mess for another couple of years.

    Even Corbyn's labour is largely remain so I suspect you would have a renegotiation to some variation of Norway followed by a Norway v remain referendum..
    They could probably have got that from T May at the end.....and it will be better to be the opposition rather than govt whenever Brexit happens.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    GIN1138 said:

    https://twitter.com/SamCoatesSky/status/1151878941969399809

    Erm... There is a recess next week for at least a month, so MPs can have a holiday.

    Why are MPs already on family holidays?

    Holiday prices go up from next week? ;)
    We have a winner.

    What a whiner that man must be.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,406

    You know, I peeked into the 'other' PB.com a little while ago. Goodness, what a civilised place that was compared to here.

    SeanT is still there, ranting admittedly but still there. TSE is still got a raging..... well, he still likes Cameron. And the discussions are civil. All the talk is about how Osborne is the shoe in against May. He basically got to pick his opponent, and Theresa May, well she might've been okay as Home Secretary but as PM material she'll never beat the Boy Wonder.

    Announcement of that Leadership contest is during Conference season and its widely expected Osborne will win, win handily and then go on to beat Corbyn in 2020 for his majority. Sure, Farage and UKIP are still a threat but three years later after the 52% Remain win, the country is moving on.

    And Osborne's win next year will mean the end of Corbyn and hopefully the Labour party can get back on its feet again. There's talk Benn or Watson will take over, or even Ed make a return.

    Of course, the Lib Dems are still struggling on 10%, but Farron can't have it all.


    What a civilised place that place is!

    They could do a remake of the Man in the High Castle set in Brexitlandia 2030 where people can travel between that reality and a different world in which Remain won.
    There would be a lot of refugees desperately trying to escape from Remainica to Brexitlandia
    I've got a feeling it may be like comparing the Republic of Ireland with Northern Ireland...

    Scarily thinking about it for 2 seconds that works on a political level as well as an economic one..
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,698

    I think the bigger reason to leave is that remain will be a very unstable and uncomfortable place to be, we would likely be one GE or one recession away from a no deal and a Brexit party govt. That is not a place long term businesses will enjoy investing in.

    If we could start from 2014 remain would be the best option, from where we are I agree with BigG that something along the lines of WA is least bad.

    If Boris calls an election and narrowly loses, no idea what Corbyn, his party, SNP and LDs could all agree on. We could get a mirror image govt mess for another couple of years.

    That's where another referendum would help: Deal v No Deal v Remain.

    No Deal wins? So be it - at least the country has voted for any economic chaos that ensues.

    Deal wins? Ok, let's sign up to the deal and leave (albeit, we will still have the transition period during which Brexit will remain all-consuming).

    Remain wins? Revoke and we Remain on the existing terms. Brexiteers will need to engineer and win a further referendum to re-open leaving. Frankly if Remain wins I think the whole project will be dead and we can forget about Brexit for good.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,406
    kle4 said:

    GIN1138 said:

    https://twitter.com/SamCoatesSky/status/1151878941969399809

    Erm... There is a recess next week for at least a month, so MPs can have a holiday.

    Why are MPs already on family holidays?

    Holiday prices go up from next week? ;)
    We have a winner.

    What a whiner that man must be.
    AS I stated before he is Scottish with Scottish school holidays... By the time he could go on holiday after Parliament is closed his children will be back at school...
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163

    kle4 said:

    eek said:

    TGOHF said:

    philiph said:

    Tory Party is unmanageable right now. That makes an election more likely as time passes.

    This. All these priggish troublemakers fade into insignificance if you have a large majority.

    Still looks like the remain "squad" will get the blame if we don't leave on 31st October.

    An election in that scenario should be decisive.
    I suspect it won't be. Remain will pick up a few seats, Labour will win more than expected because a referendum is neither here nor there and the Tories will be roughly the same (say -10 to 20 or so seats).

    And Parliament would be even more screwed...
    100% wrong. It will be the "who governs Britain - the voters or the MPs?" election.
    Am I alone in thinking that is always a very stupid question?
    It shouldn't need asking. But it does right now.
    Whatever the outcome of the elections the voters will have spoken, so asking that question doesn't matter. If they give an answer some people do not like will 'the voters' still be governing? It's meaningless.

    It's like those stupid moments when there's some tight vote in the Commons and the government wins and it is framed as the government trying to restrict parliament or something, when parliament made its will known by backing the government.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,237
    HYUFD said:

    With Salvini's Lega Nord still on 36% and 12.5% ahead of the 2nd placed Democratic Party in the latest Italian poll this week and Bolsonaro having been elected President in Brazil last year, the idea that Trump is somehow unique is not correct. Indeed we voted for Brexit before Trump arrived.

    Trump IS unique in one particular and very important sense.

    He is the only full throttle racist to hold the position of American president in modern times.

    That is quite remarkable. Certainly something I never expected to see.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,572

    nico67 said:

    nico67 said:

    It’s quite astonishing to see what has happened today .

    Dominic Grieves original amendment which was much weaker than this scraped home by one vote .

    The Lords then added an amendment , this was strengthened today and it passed by 41 votes !

    All this could have been avoided by a simple no to suspend Parliament by Johnson . So in effect he’s forced this issue and the symbolism of such a rebellion amongst the Tories puts a marker down .

    I really do think the Tories have badly misjudged this Leadership , there’s no chance Bozo can unite the party .

    Gove for all his faults could have done that , the fact he remained loyal to May and did at least try to hold out an olive branch to the more pro EU wing of the party .

    I just can’t see how this ends well.

    Brexit cannot now be resolved by compromise. It could have been had T May gone down that route in 2016 but now both sides are too deeply entrenched. As Bozo said, it's do or die. And both his premiership and Brexit are going to die.
    The thing is so many forecasts of what might happen have ended up not being realized . If someone had told me in early March we’d still be in the EU in the summer I wouldn’t have believed it .

    Nothing would shock me anymore .
    It's clear that parliament will not countenance no deal and it's also clear that the EU will not change May's deal in any meaningful way. Bozo has set his face so strongly against that deal that he could not credibly recommend anything resembling it to the HoC. So it will not be no deal, it will not be the only deal on offer, ergo it will be remain, probably disguised as another A50 extension initially.
    Missing the obvious point that, short of actually getting rid of Boris, Parliament cannot stop a No Deal. And as we have seen before, when it really comes to the crunch votes, the Anti- No Deal side generally seem to come up short.
    Today was proxy no deal vote. Had it been a genuine no deal vote many of the Tories who abstained would have voted against and the majority against no deal would have been close to 100.
    Again missing the obvious point that it doesn't matter if it was a proxy No Deal vote. The more important point was whether it was a proxy revoke vote. Because if Boris does not bend that that is the only way you will stop a No Deal Brexit.

    And I would suggest that there is a very bog leap from voting against No Deal to voting for Revoke. Particularly when the latter will mean the end of so many political careers.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869

    nico67 said:

    nico67 said:

    It’s quite astonishing to see what has happened today .

    Dominic Grieves original amendment which was much weaker than this scraped home by one vote .

    The Lords then added an amendment , this was strengthened today and it passed by 41 votes !

    All this could have been avoided by a simple no to suspend Parliament by Johnson . So in effect he’s forced this issue and the symbolism of such a rebellion amongst the Tories puts a marker down .

    I really do think the Tories have badly misjudged this Leadership , there’s no chance Bozo can unite the party .

    Gove for all his faults could have done that , the fact he remained loyal to May and did at least try to hold out an olive branch to the more pro EU wing of the party .

    I just can’t see how this ends well.

    Brexit cannot now be resolved by compromise. It could have been had T May gone down that route in 2016 but now both sides are too deeply entrenched. As Bozo said, it's do or die. And both his premiership and Brexit are going to die.
    The thing is so many forecasts of what might happen have ended up not being realized . If someone had told me in early March we’d still be in the EU in the summer I wouldn’t have believed it .

    Nothing would shock me anymore .
    It's clear that parliament will not countenance no deal and it's also clear that the EU will not change May's deal in any meaningful way. Bozo has set his face so strongly against that deal that he could not credibly recommend anything resembling it to the HoC. So it will not be no deal, it will not be the only deal on offer, ergo it will be remain, probably disguised as another A50 extension initially.
    Missing the obvious point that, short of actually getting rid of Boris, Parliament cannot stop a No Deal. And as we have seen before, when it really comes to the crunch votes, the Anti- No Deal side generally seem to come up short.
    Surely the “obvious point” is that we haven’t yet reached a “crunch vote”?

    Today suggests that the no deal position would be defeated easily as and when that day comes. The political significance is greater than the formal effect of the amendment to the NI Bill. The great Bozo now knows that if he pushes things to a crunch vote, he will lose.
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 4,502
    The choice is do you want to be allied to a lunatic racist in the WH or Remain close to the EU.

    Trumps election had made the case for Brexit and especially no deal even more difficult . It’s added another thing to the mix .

    Remainers like myself could possibly stomach an orderly exit with a sensible deal but now left with the option of no deal and arselicking Trump it’s polarizing things further .

  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    eek said:

    kle4 said:

    GIN1138 said:

    https://twitter.com/SamCoatesSky/status/1151878941969399809

    Erm... There is a recess next week for at least a month, so MPs can have a holiday.

    Why are MPs already on family holidays?

    Holiday prices go up from next week? ;)
    We have a winner.

    What a whiner that man must be.
    AS I stated before he is Scottish with Scottish school holidays... By the time he could go on holiday after Parliament is closed his children will be back at school...
    Oh boo hoo, what a tragedy. MPs know what the job is, and collectively have responsibility over this nation and unfortunately that might result in some personal life disruption. Reasonable accomodation will only go so far, and having to rearrange or even miss a holiday is not causing me to break out in tears as this poor poor person who chose to be there knowing what the job was.
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527

    justin124 said:
    Fwiw the actual predictions show 5 SNP gains from SLab.

    Still, narrowly second, eh?
    I was referring - quite seriously - to second/third!
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,298
    God this good.

    Perfectly captures the rancid and philistinic tone of Brexit Island.

    The “May-Pollard bilateral” line had me in stitches.

    By the way, why is Arron Banks at a Tory fundraiser?

    https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/lostinshowbiz/2019/jul/18/hi-de-hi-repeats-as-the-bad-boys-of-brexit-meet-su-pollard
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,698
    eek said:

    kle4 said:

    GIN1138 said:

    https://twitter.com/SamCoatesSky/status/1151878941969399809

    Erm... There is a recess next week for at least a month, so MPs can have a holiday.

    Why are MPs already on family holidays?

    Holiday prices go up from next week? ;)
    We have a winner.

    What a whiner that man must be.
    AS I stated before he is Scottish with Scottish school holidays... By the time he could go on holiday after Parliament is closed his children will be back at school...
    You may have stated it before but it's still bollocks. Parliament rises for the summer recess on 25th July, Scottish summer school holidays finish on 16th August.

    So that's three clear weeks for poor old Colin Clark to chill in the Tuscan hills.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,733

    You know, I peeked into the 'other' PB.com a little while ago. Goodness, what a civilised place that was compared to here.

    SeanT is still there, ranting admittedly but still there. TSE is still got a raging..... well, he still likes Cameron. And the discussions are civil. All the talk is about how Osborne is the shoe in against May. He basically got to pick his opponent, and Theresa May, well she might've been okay as Home Secretary but as PM material she'll never beat the Boy Wonder.

    Announcement of that Leadership contest is during Conference season and its widely expected Osborne will win, win handily and then go on to beat Corbyn in 2020 for his majority. Sure, Farage and UKIP are still a threat but three years later after the 52% Remain win, the country is moving on.

    And Osborne's win next year will mean the end of Corbyn and hopefully the Labour party can get back on its feet again. There's talk Benn or Watson will take over, or even Ed make a return.

    Of course, the Lib Dems are still struggling on 10%, but Farron can't have it all.


    What a civilised place that place is!

    They could do a remake of the Man in the High Castle set in Brexitlandia 2030 where people can travel between that reality and a different world in which Remain won.
    There would be a lot of refugees desperately trying to escape from Remainica to Brexitlandia
    Partition of the country and mass population movements seem the only sane outcome.

    I think the refugees from Leverstan will outnumber those going the other way,
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527

    justin124 said:

    eek said:

    justin124 said:
    Labour are going nowhere in Scotland no matter how much you spin it
    Yep - if Labour is second in scotland with more than a few token seats I think the model is wrong
    It only gives Labour 15% there with the Tories on 13%. LDs and Brexit Party are both on 10%.
    Not inclined to believe the London data - Labour, LibDem & Tories all in 26% - 28% range.
    Don't take subsamples literally. They are not weighted.
    I don't do anything of the kind!
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869
    kinabalu said:

    HYUFD said:

    With Salvini's Lega Nord still on 36% and 12.5% ahead of the 2nd placed Democratic Party in the latest Italian poll this week and Bolsonaro having been elected President in Brazil last year, the idea that Trump is somehow unique is not correct. Indeed we voted for Brexit before Trump arrived.

    Trump IS unique in one particular and very important sense.

    He is the only full throttle racist to hold the position of American president in modern times.

    That is quite remarkable. Certainly something I never expected to see.
    It’s more that he is utterly ignorant of his nation’s history and is clumsily breaking all the taboos that people would expect any sensible educated President to respect.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,572
    Foxy said:

    You know, I peeked into the 'other' PB.com a little while ago. Goodness, what a civilised place that was compared to here.

    SeanT is still there, ranting admittedly but still there. TSE is still got a raging..... well, he still likes Cameron. And the discussions are civil. All the talk is about how Osborne is the shoe in against May. He basically got to pick his opponent, and Theresa May, well she might've been okay as Home Secretary but as PM material she'll never beat the Boy Wonder.

    Announcement of that Leadership contest is during Conference season and its widely expected Osborne will win, win handily and then go on to beat Corbyn in 2020 for his majority. Sure, Farage and UKIP are still a threat but three years later after the 52% Remain win, the country is moving on.

    And Osborne's win next year will mean the end of Corbyn and hopefully the Labour party can get back on its feet again. There's talk Benn or Watson will take over, or even Ed make a return.

    Of course, the Lib Dems are still struggling on 10%, but Farron can't have it all.


    What a civilised place that place is!

    They could do a remake of the Man in the High Castle set in Brexitlandia 2030 where people can travel between that reality and a different world in which Remain won.
    There would be a lot of refugees desperately trying to escape from Remainica to Brexitlandia
    Partition of the country and mass population movements seem the only sane outcome.

    I think the refugees from Leverstan will outnumber those going the other way,
    I am sure you will be happy in your London ghetto.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 63,133
    kjh said:

    kjh said:

    kjh said:

    kjh said:

    Cicero said:

    nico67 said:

    Interesting to see Tories who were never seen as part of the awkward squad voting against the government .

    years.

    nutters I guess
    In all seriousness if I were a Tory MP (I never will be) even as a determined Leaver and someone who would always choose No Deal over Remain were that the final choice, I would have voted for this
    👍
    That is my view

    Despite HYFUD and Viceroy comments telling us to clear off to the Lib Dems we will remain and fight the ultras who think they can take us into some dark age and economic armageddon
    In the nicest possible way there are a number of you on here whom I struggle to understand why you/they are not in the LDs Those that I am thinking of really have views that are pretty well indistinguishable from mine (or am I in the wrong party?)
    Probably TBP if you agree with Viceroy but the conservative party has to be a broad church
    Oh BGNW I obviously worded that badly. I'm a LD. A shudder went down my back when I read that.

    What I meant was we have an awful lot in in common as I do with a number of other moderate sensible Tories on here and I really don't feel like I am in the wrong party.

    To quote HYFD however I am a 'lefty', something I don't think I have ever been called before.
    Looks like I misunderstood you and did not know you are a LD.

    I am more to the centre left of the conservative party and I do believe the coalition was an excellent government

    However, I do support Brexit even though I voted remain and believe we should have accepted TM deal. I reject no deal under all circumstances and am pleased that my party's responsible mps voted today to stop the proroguing of the HOC
    N problem. I obviously haven't made my mark here then even though I've been in and out since the very beginning :wink:

    Agree on coalition.

    We do differ on Brexit however. I think it has to be killed stone dead.
    And I respect your view and the Lib Dems are reaping the benefits of being honest, as are the SNP
    Cheers. Good luck with your battle within the Conservative party, but if not successful you will always be welcome this side of the fence.
    Thank you
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869
    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    eek said:

    justin124 said:
    Labour are going nowhere in Scotland no matter how much you spin it
    Yep - if Labour is second in scotland with more than a few token seats I think the model is wrong
    It only gives Labour 15% there with the Tories on 13%. LDs and Brexit Party are both on 10%.
    Not inclined to believe the London data - Labour, LibDem & Tories all in 26% - 28% range.
    Don't take subsamples literally. They are not weighted.
    I don't do anything of the kind!
    Cue HY....
  • eekeek Posts: 28,406
    edited July 2019

    eek said:

    kle4 said:

    GIN1138 said:

    https://twitter.com/SamCoatesSky/status/1151878941969399809

    Erm... There is a recess next week for at least a month, so MPs can have a holiday.

    Why are MPs already on family holidays?

    Holiday prices go up from next week? ;)
    We have a winner.

    What a whiner that man must be.
    AS I stated before he is Scottish with Scottish school holidays... By the time he could go on holiday after Parliament is closed his children will be back at school...
    You may have stated it before but it's still bollocks. Parliament rises for the summer recess on 25th July, Scottish summer school holidays finish on 16th August.

    So that's three clear weeks for poor old Colin Clark to chill in the Tuscan hills.
    but as an MP he only earns £77k a year (all expenses covered and he flys so doesn't need to worry about the second class rail fare restriction) - can he afford a holiday when all schools are closed...
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,298
    edited July 2019
    The problem with “Brexit” is still that it is based on lies.

    There are Brexits that are not.
    Tyndall Brexits, Richard North Brexits, rcs100 Brexits do not appear to be based on a false prospectus although I may disagree, sometimes violently, with various premises.

    But “Brexit” as it is promoted by its key spokespeople from all parties and none is utter bullshit, first about the expected benefits, then about the expected response from the EU, and still today about the supposed ease of execution.

    The willingness to lie opens up a moral hole from which all sorts of degradations fall out (proroguing, recourse to false and offensive WWII analogies, etc).

    Brexit will not stand unless it can accommodate itself to truth telling.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,733
    kinabalu said:

    HYUFD said:

    With Salvini's Lega Nord still on 36% and 12.5% ahead of the 2nd placed Democratic Party in the latest Italian poll this week and Bolsonaro having been elected President in Brazil last year, the idea that Trump is somehow unique is not correct. Indeed we voted for Brexit before Trump arrived.

    Trump IS unique in one particular and very important sense.

    He is the only full throttle racist to hold the position of American president in modern times.

    That is quite remarkable. Certainly something I never expected to see.
    I think the last overt Racist to win a state for POTUS was George Wallace in 1968.

    5 states and a single (? unfaithful) elector in North Carolina, but his spirit lives on.

    America is an increasingly bad place racially. When I lived in Georgia in the 1970s it all seemed ancient history.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869

    kjh said:

    kjh said:

    kjh said:

    kjh said:

    Cicero said:

    nico67 said:

    Interesting to see Tories who were never seen as part of the awkward squad voting against the government .

    years.

    nutters I guess
    In all seriousness if I were a Tory MP (I never will be) even as a determined Leaver and someone who would always choose No Deal over Remain were that the final choice, I would have voted for this
    👍
    That is my view

    Despite HYFUD and Viceroy comments telling us to clear off to the Lib Dems we will remain and fight the ultras who think they can take us into some dark age and economic armageddon
    In the nicest possible way there are a number of you on here whom I struggle to understand why you/they are not in the LDs Those that I am thinking of really have views that are pretty well indistinguishable from mine (or am I in the wrong party?)
    Probably TBP if you agree with Viceroy but the conservative party has to be a broad church
    Oh BGNW I obviously worded that badly. I'm a LD. A shudder went down my back when I read that.

    What I meant was we have an awful lot in in common as I do with a number of other moderate sensible Tories on here and I really don't feel like I am in the wrong party.

    To quote HYFD however I am a 'lefty', something I don't think I have ever been called before.
    Looks like I misunderstood you and did not know you are a LD.

    I am more to the centre left of the conservative party and I do believe the coalition was an excellent government

    However, I do support Brexit even though I voted remain and believe we should have accepted TM deal. I reject no deal under all circumstances and am pleased that my party's responsible mps voted today to stop the proroguing of the HOC
    N problem. I obviously haven't made my mark here then even though I've been in and out since the very beginning :wink:

    Agree on coalition.

    We do differ on Brexit however. I think it has to be killed stone dead.
    And I respect your view and the Lib Dems are reaping the benefits of being honest, as are the SNP
    Cheers. Good luck with your battle within the Conservative party, but if not successful you will always be welcome this side of the fence.
    Thank you
    From your previous posts you were intending to resign your membership early next week.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,406

    The problem with “Brexit” is still that it is based on lies.

    There are Brexits that are not.
    Tyndall Brexits, Richard North Brexits, rcs100 Brexits do not appear to be based on a false prospectus although I may disagree, sometimes violently, with various premises.

    But “Brexit” as it is promoted by its key spokespeople from all parties and none is utter bullshit, first about the expected benefits, then about the expected response from the EU, and still today about the supposed ease of execution.

    The willingness to lie opens up a moral hole from which all sorts of degradations fall out (proroguing, recourse to false and offensive WWII analogies, etc).

    Brexit will not stand unless it can accommodate itself to truth telling.

    You missed the fact that even yesterday Boris's reason for us leaving was based on a story that didn't stand scrutiny...
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,733

    Foxy said:

    You know, I peeked into the 'other' PB.com a little while ago. Goodness, what a civilised place that was compared to here.

    SeanT is still there, ranting admittedly but still there. TSE is still got a raging..... well, he still likes Cameron. And the discussions are civil. All the talk is about how Osborne is the shoe in against May. He basically got to pick his opponent, and Theresa May, well she might've been okay as Home Secretary but as PM material she'll never beat the Boy Wonder.

    Announcement of that Leadership contest is during Conference season and its widely expected Osborne will win, win handily and then go on to beat Corbyn in 2020 for his majority. Sure, Farage and UKIP are still a threat but three years later after the 52% Remain win, the country is moving on.

    And Osborne's win next year will mean the end of Corbyn and hopefully the Labour party can get back on its feet again. There's talk Benn or Watson will take over, or even Ed make a return.

    Of course, the Lib Dems are still struggling on 10%, but Farron can't have it all.


    What a civilised place that place is!

    They could do a remake of the Man in the High Castle set in Brexitlandia 2030 where people can travel between that reality and a different world in which Remain won.
    There would be a lot of refugees desperately trying to escape from Remainica to Brexitlandia
    Partition of the country and mass population movements seem the only sane outcome.

    I think the refugees from Leverstan will outnumber those going the other way,
    I am sure you will be happy in your London ghetto.
    Leicester is part of Remania, and I think several of the other Leics counting areas will have flipped to Remain.
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 4,502
    In terms of revoke .

    As a Remainer this is a horrible option and if I was an MP it would fill me with dread .

    I admit I’d love to see Brexit put out of its misery but I strongly believe that can only happen with another EU referendum .

    I think it’s wrong to think MPs would easily revoke over no deal , because if people like me who couldn’t be more pro EU have serious reservations over this then what must MPs be dealing with .

    I’m confident there’s the numbers to stop no deal by legislation but on revoke I’m really not sure .

    I suppose a lot depends on external events , what the pounds doing , business etc
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,298
    nico67 said:

    In terms of revoke .

    As a Remainer this is a horrible option and if I was an MP it would fill me with dread .

    I admit I’d love to see Brexit put out of its misery but I strongly believe that can only happen with another EU referendum .

    I think it’s wrong to think MPs would easily revoke over no deal , because if people like me who couldn’t be more pro EU have serious reservations over this then what must MPs be dealing with .

    I’m confident there’s the numbers to stop no deal by legislation but on revoke I’m really not sure .

    I suppose a lot depends on external events , what the pounds doing , business etc

    In reality, almost no one believes it acceptable to simply “Revoke” which is why talk of “extreme Remainers” is rather tedious.
  • geoffwgeoffw Posts: 8,722
    I've just read a couple of interesting articles in the Daily Torygraph. The first by Nigel Farage argues that von der Leyen's eurofanaticism could be an asset for Boris Johnson.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/07/18/ursula-von-der-leyen-fanatical-european-federalist-could-make/

    The other, by Peter Foster, takes stock of how we got here and argues that May's Brexit policy was incoherent: "In short, she promised the UK could ‘have its cake and eat it’, and when the EU (repeatedly) said that was not possible, Mrs May responded simply by bouncing incoherently between being co-operative and confrontational."

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/07/18/may-did-not-flunk-brexit-failed-back-no-deal-political-cowardice/
  • kyf_100kyf_100 Posts: 4,951
    nico67 said:

    In terms of revoke .

    As a Remainer this is a horrible option and if I was an MP it would fill me with dread .

    I admit I’d love to see Brexit put out of its misery but I strongly believe that can only happen with another EU referendum .

    I think it’s wrong to think MPs would easily revoke over no deal , because if people like me who couldn’t be more pro EU have serious reservations over this then what must MPs be dealing with .

    I’m confident there’s the numbers to stop no deal by legislation but on revoke I’m really not sure .

    I suppose a lot depends on external events , what the pounds doing , business etc

    I don't think a second referendum ends anything, except the Conservative Party. If the vote is narrowly to remain, BXP will replace them as the main right-of-centre party and they could gain a majority on 35% of the vote and take us out that way.

    I increasingly think that the most likely outcome is messy, no-deal exit followed by cap-in-hand rejoin.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 63,133
    IanB2 said:

    kjh said:

    kjh said:

    kjh said:

    kjh said:

    Cicero said:

    nico67 said:

    Interesting to see Tories who were never seen as part of the awkward squad voting against the government .

    years.

    nutters I guess
    In all seriousness if I were a Tory M
    👍
    That is my view

    Despite HYFUD and Viceroy comments telling us to clear off to the Lib Dems we will remain and fight the ultras who think they can take us into some dark age and economic armageddon
    In the nicest possible way there are a number of you on here whom I struggle to understand why you/they are not in the LDs Those that I am thinking of really have views that are pretty well indistinguishable from mine (or am I in the wrong party?)
    Probably TBP if you agree with Viceroy but the conservative party has to be a broad church
    Oh BGNW I obviously worded that badly. I'm a LD. A shudder went down my back when I read that.

    What I meant was we have an awful lot in in common as I do with a number of other moderate sensible Tories on here and I really don't feel like I am in the wrong party.

    To quote HYFD however I am a 'lefty', something I don't think I have ever been called before.
    Looks like I misunderstood you and did not know you are a LD.

    I am more to the centre left of the conservative party and I do believe the coalition was an excellent government

    However, I do support Brexit even though I voted remain and believe we should have accepted TM deal. I reject no deal under all circumstances and am pleased that my party's responsible mps voted today to stop the proroguing of the HOC
    N problem. I obviously haven't made my mark here then even though I've been in and out since the very beginning :wink:

    Agree on coalition.

    We do differ on Brexit however. I think it has to be killed stone dead.
    And I respect your view and the Lib Dems are reaping the benefits of being honest, as are the SNP
    Cheers. Good luck with your battle within the Conservative party, but if not successful you will always be welcome this side of the fence.
    Thank you
    From your previous posts you were intending to resign your membership early next week.
    No deal will not happen next week. If Boris does no deal then it is over for me
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 4,502
    I think the only way revoke gets through is the following .

    The legislation is amended so that revoke comes with another EU vote which states no deal or Remain.

    If it’s no deal then the UK then just gives notice it’s leaving without the Article 50 process.

  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,679
    Foxy said:

    kinabalu said:

    HYUFD said:

    With Salvini's Lega Nord still on 36% and 12.5% ahead of the 2nd placed Democratic Party in the latest Italian poll this week and Bolsonaro having been elected President in Brazil last year, the idea that Trump is somehow unique is not correct. Indeed we voted for Brexit before Trump arrived.

    Trump IS unique in one particular and very important sense.

    He is the only full throttle racist to hold the position of American president in modern times.

    That is quite remarkable. Certainly something I never expected to see.
    I think the last overt Racist to win a state for POTUS was George Wallace in 1968.

    5 states and a single (? unfaithful) elector in North Carolina, but his spirit lives on.

    America is an increasingly bad place racially. When I lived in Georgia in the 1970s it all seemed ancient history.
    Wallace was an interesting fellow.

    He wasn't considered a racist but lost an election to an opponent who as prosecutor had obtained the death penalty for an African American chap who stole a purse from a white woman.

    Wallace vowed he'd never get out n*ggered again and pivoted to the far right.

    After he was shot in the 70s he recanted his views and hired many many African Americans to roles in the state.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869
    kyf_100 said:

    nico67 said:

    In terms of revoke .

    As a Remainer this is a horrible option and if I was an MP it would fill me with dread .

    I admit I’d love to see Brexit put out of its misery but I strongly believe that can only happen with another EU referendum .

    I think it’s wrong to think MPs would easily revoke over no deal , because if people like me who couldn’t be more pro EU have serious reservations over this then what must MPs be dealing with .

    I’m confident there’s the numbers to stop no deal by legislation but on revoke I’m really not sure .

    I suppose a lot depends on external events , what the pounds doing , business etc

    I don't think a second referendum ends anything, except the Conservative Party. If the vote is narrowly to remain, BXP will replace them as the main right-of-centre party and they could gain a majority on 35% of the vote and take us out that way.

    I increasingly think that the most likely outcome is messy, no-deal exit followed by cap-in-hand rejoin.
    Given the rising extremism of both left and right in this country, surely the rest of us should be embracing the urgent need for electoral reform - to prevent any extremist gathering majority power on a minority 35% of the vote - before it is too late?
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    There is no good outcome from here. The country is going to be consumed by Brexit for many years to come, with no stable settlement in sight.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,176
    IanB2 said:

    kyf_100 said:

    nico67 said:

    In terms of revoke .

    As a Remainer this is a horrible option and if I was an MP it would fill me with dread .

    I admit I’d love to see Brexit put out of its misery but I strongly believe that can only happen with another EU referendum .

    I think it’s wrong to think MPs would easily revoke over no deal , because if people like me who couldn’t be more pro EU have serious reservations over this then what must MPs be dealing with .

    I’m confident there’s the numbers to stop no deal by legislation but on revoke I’m really not sure .

    I suppose a lot depends on external events , what the pounds doing , business etc

    I don't think a second referendum ends anything, except the Conservative Party. If the vote is narrowly to remain, BXP will replace them as the main right-of-centre party and they could gain a majority on 35% of the vote and take us out that way.

    I increasingly think that the most likely outcome is messy, no-deal exit followed by cap-in-hand rejoin.
    Given the rising extremism of both left and right in this country, surely the rest of us should be embracing the urgent need for electoral reform - to prevent any extremist gathering majority power on a minority 35% of the vote - before it is too late?
    The time for that was 2005-15. It’s too late now.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 63,133

    There is no good outcome from here. The country is going to be consumed by Brexit for many years to come, with no stable settlement in sight.

    I fear you are right
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869

    IanB2 said:

    kjh said:

    kjh said:

    kjh said:

    kjh said:

    Cicero said:

    nico67 said:

    Interesting to see

    years.

    nutters I guess
    In all seriousness if I were a Tory M
    👍
    That is my view

    Despite HYFUD and Viceroy comments telling us to clear off to the Lib Dems we will remain and fight the ultras
    In the nicest possible way there are a number of you on here whom I struggle to understand why you/they are not in the LDs Those that I am thinking of really have views that are pretty well indistinguishable from mine (or am I in the wrong party?)
    Probably TBP if you agree with Viceroy but the conservative party has to be a broad church
    Oh BGNW I obviously worded that badly. I'm a LD. A shudder went down my back when I read that.

    What I meant was we have an awful lot in in common as I do with a number of other moderate sensible Tories on here and I really don't feel like I am in the wrong party.

    To quote HYFD however I am a 'lefty', something I don't think I have ever been called before.
    Looks like I misunderstood you and did not know you are a LD.

    I am more to the centre left of the conservative party and I do believe the coalition was an excellent government

    However, I do support Brexit even though I voted remain and believe we should have accepted TM deal. I reject no deal under all circumstances and am pleased that my party's responsible mps voted today to stop the proroguing of the HOC
    N problem. I obviously haven't made my mark here then even though I've been in and out since the very beginning :wink:

    Agree on coalition.

    We do differ on Brexit however. I think it has to be killed stone dead.
    And I respect your view and the Lib Dems are reaping the benefits of being honest, as are the SNP
    Cheers. Good luck with your battle within the Conservative party, but if not successful you will always be welcome this side of the fence.
    Thank you
    From your previous posts you were intending to resign your membership early next week.
    No deal will not happen next week. If Boris does no deal then it is over for me
    Our country needs people with integrity like you to make their stand, before it is too late.
  • StuartDicksonStuartDickson Posts: 12,146

    There is no good outcome from here. The country is going to be consumed by Brexit for many years to come, with no stable settlement in sight.

    I fear you are right
    I hope you are right.
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 4,502
    Omg that’s so funny ! And they seriously think Bercow will allow them to get away with that .
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,679

    There is no good outcome from here. The country is going to be consumed by Brexit for many years to come, with no stable settlement in sight.

    This is why I'm leaning to No Deal.

    I think they country will stomach it for six months max, and then we'll rejoin, and the Leavers will have no credibility to oppose it.

    Every time they'll say no, rejoining will be a disaster, the country will remind them they said No Deal was Project Fear and/or No Deal will be fine.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869
    Tuesday’s LibDem hold in Cardiff:

    LD 1920 [55.3%; +18.9%]
    Con 838 [24.1%; -11.9%]
    Lab 560 [16.1%; -3.3%]
    PC 152 [4.4% +4.4%]
    Grn 0 [[0.0%; -8.1%]]

    I assume the Green candidate didn’t live in the ward...
  • eekeek Posts: 28,406

    There is no good outcome from here. The country is going to be consumed by Brexit for many years to come, with no stable settlement in sight.

    This is why I'm leaning to No Deal.

    I think they country will stomach it for six months max, and then we'll rejoin, and the Leavers will have no credibility to oppose it.

    Every time they'll say no, rejoining will be a disaster, the country will remind them they said No Deal was Project Fear and/or No Deal will be fine.
    Why would the EU let us rejoin, there are other far less troublesome places (such as say Serbia) in the queue ahead of us...
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 22,847
    IanB2 said:

    kyf_100 said:

    nico67 said:

    In terms of revoke .

    As a Remainer this is a horrible option and if I was an MP it would fill me with dread .

    I admit I’d love to see Brexit put out of its misery but I strongly believe that can only happen with another EU referendum .

    I think it’s wrong to think MPs would easily revoke over no deal , because if people like me who couldn’t be more pro EU have serious reservations over this then what must MPs be dealing with .

    I’m confident there’s the numbers to stop no deal by legislation but on revoke I’m really not sure .

    I suppose a lot depends on external events , what the pounds doing , business etc

    I don't think a second referendum ends anything, except the Conservative Party. If the vote is narrowly to remain, BXP will replace them as the main right-of-centre party and they could gain a majority on 35% of the vote and take us out that way.

    I increasingly think that the most likely outcome is messy, no-deal exit followed by cap-in-hand rejoin.
    Given the rising extremism of both left and right in this country, surely the rest of us should be embracing the urgent need for electoral reform - to prevent any extremist gathering majority power on a minority 35% of the vote - before it is too late?
    And how would we do that? It seems the LDs and greens cant even agree to stand aside in a few seats each? Moderate Tory and Labour MPs think they can solve the problems from within their taken over parties, when it is obvious that wont happen, at least in a 5 year time scale. Not to mention the UK not really liking the idea of PR.
  • YorkcityYorkcity Posts: 4,382
    kinabalu said:

    nico67 said:

    I hope you’re right . Trump is a cancer not just on the USA but the world . Soon his baying mob will be shouting string her up . These are very dark times for the USA , and by extension the rest of us . Trump is enabling a new very ugly type of politics.

    Agree with every word except "new".

    We have seen this before all too often.

    What's new is seeing it in the White House. Truly shocking. And scary.
    It really is.
    The recent series on the BBC , Years and Years, I watched , seemed like reality about to happen.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,679
    eek said:

    There is no good outcome from here. The country is going to be consumed by Brexit for many years to come, with no stable settlement in sight.

    This is why I'm leaning to No Deal.

    I think they country will stomach it for six months max, and then we'll rejoin, and the Leavers will have no credibility to oppose it.

    Every time they'll say no, rejoining will be a disaster, the country will remind them they said No Deal was Project Fear and/or No Deal will be fine.
    Why would the EU let us rejoin, there are other far less troublesome places (such as say Serbia) in the queue ahead of us...
    They'll put penalty clauses in, like we cannot leave for 150 years, if we do leave early, we have to pay 1 trillion pounds in compensation to the EU for every year of early termination.
  • not_on_firenot_on_fire Posts: 4,449
    IanB2 said:

    Tuesday’s LibDem hold in Cardiff:

    LD 1920 [55.3%; +18.9%]
    Con 838 [24.1%; -11.9%]
    Lab 560 [16.1%; -3.3%]
    PC 152 [4.4% +4.4%]
    Grn 0 [[0.0%; -8.1%]]

    I assume the Green candidate didn’t live in the ward...

    Zero votes for a candidate from a national party! How often does that happen?
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    kyf_100 said:

    nico67 said:

    In terms of revoke .

    As a Remainer this is a horrible option and if I was an MP it would fill me with dread .

    I admit I’d love to see Brexit put out of its misery but I strongly believe that can only happen with another EU referendum .

    I think it’s wrong to think MPs would easily revoke over no deal , because if people like me who couldn’t be more pro EU have serious reservations over this then what must MPs be dealing with .

    I’m confident there’s the numbers to stop no deal by legislation but on revoke I’m really not sure .

    I suppose a lot depends on external events , what the pounds doing , business etc

    I don't think a second referendum ends anything, except the Conservative Party. If the vote is narrowly to remain, BXP will replace them as the main right-of-centre party and they could gain a majority on 35% of the vote and take us out that way.

    I increasingly think that the most likely outcome is messy, no-deal exit followed by cap-in-hand rejoin.
    The only way out is a general election after revoke and if and when a party wins a majority on a leave platform so be it, they will have to own and deliver it and face the consequences. Where we are in a parliamentary democracy is ridiculous if you want to leave vote for a party that unambiguously wants to leave with a clear objective and a plan. Otherwise shut the fuck up because you can’t carve a way out of this based on the past history of a referendum etc. stand for a election with a plan to leave and put it to the people, if you win get on with it.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    Not exactly a masterstroke designed to build trust in our presumptive Prime Minister. The unravelling is getting at least as much publicity as the stunt itself.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869
    Today’s by-elections:

    Crime Commissioner, Northumberland - surely a Labour hold
    Ceredigion Aberystwyth PC defence - looks a safe PC hold
    Daventry Tory defence - looks safe, would be an upset if the Tories lose
    Westbury - LibDem defence - looks safe
    Richmond on Thames - LibDem defence - looks safe
    Ashford, Kent - Tory defence - looks a chance for a LibDem or Green upset
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 51,884

    There is no good outcome from here. The country is going to be consumed by Brexit for many years to come, with no stable settlement in sight.

    This is why I'm leaning to No Deal.

    I think they country will stomach it for six months max, and then we'll rejoin, and the Leavers will have no credibility to oppose it.

    Every time they'll say no, rejoining will be a disaster, the country will remind them they said No Deal was Project Fear and/or No Deal will be fine.
    "If you're gonna eat tuna, expect bones!"
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,298
    I have a dear friend who was told to “go back to where you come from” yesterday.

    Did this happen before 2016? Surely.
    What’s different is that nativism has been legitimated.
  • rpjsrpjs Posts: 3,787

    IanB2 said:

    Tuesday’s LibDem hold in Cardiff:

    LD 1920 [55.3%; +18.9%]
    Con 838 [24.1%; -11.9%]
    Lab 560 [16.1%; -3.3%]
    PC 152 [4.4% +4.4%]
    Grn 0 [[0.0%; -8.1%]]

    I assume the Green candidate didn’t live in the ward...

    Zero votes for a candidate from a national party! How often does that happen?
    You need a proposer, seconder and I think a dozen or so more signatures just to get on the ballot!
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869

    Not exactly a masterstroke designed to build trust in our presumptive Prime Minister. The unravelling is getting at least as much publicity as the stunt itself.
    Bozo needs to learn that the stunts that get you attention as a hungry journalist or Tory backbencher don’t really work when you are in line to become our Prime Minister.
  • anothernickanothernick Posts: 3,591



    Again missing the obvious point that it doesn't matter if it was a proxy No Deal vote. The more important point was whether it was a proxy revoke vote. Because if Boris does not bend that that is the only way you will stop a No Deal Brexit.

    And I would suggest that there is a very bog leap from voting against No Deal to voting for Revoke. Particularly when the latter will mean the end of so many political careers.

    I'm not expecting parliament to vote to revoke. I think Boris will go full on no deal as he and his acolytes think the EU will blink. So we will get to early October and the realisation will gradually dawn that the EU is not going to blink and, what's more, there is a majority in the Commons prepared to VONC Boris unless he seeks a further extension of A50. So either he becomes the shortest serving PM ever or swallows his pride and seeks an extension. I guess he will buckle and thus his credibility will be shot and he will become ever more impotent than May has been in the past few months.
  • rpjsrpjs Posts: 3,787
    eek said:

    There is no good outcome from here. The country is going to be consumed by Brexit for many years to come, with no stable settlement in sight.

    This is why I'm leaning to No Deal.

    I think they country will stomach it for six months max, and then we'll rejoin, and the Leavers will have no credibility to oppose it.

    Every time they'll say no, rejoining will be a disaster, the country will remind them they said No Deal was Project Fear and/or No Deal will be fine.
    Why would the EU let us rejoin, there are other far less troublesome places (such as say Serbia) in the queue ahead of us...
    Why wouldn't they? No more opt-outs, including from Schengen and the Euro. And if we question anything in the future after re-joining, they can just say "what are you going to do about it? Leave?"
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869
    rpjs said:

    IanB2 said:

    Tuesday’s LibDem hold in Cardiff:

    LD 1920 [55.3%; +18.9%]
    Con 838 [24.1%; -11.9%]
    Lab 560 [16.1%; -3.3%]
    PC 152 [4.4% +4.4%]
    Grn 0 [[0.0%; -8.1%]]

    I assume the Green candidate didn’t live in the ward...

    Zero votes for a candidate from a national party! How often does that happen?
    You need a proposer, seconder and I think a dozen or so more signatures just to get on the ballot!
    Eight more.

    Although, speaking from experience, it isn’t that difficult to get them by knocking on doors at random.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    IanB2 said:

    Today’s by-elections:

    Crime Commissioner, Northumberland - surely a Labour hold
    Ceredigion Aberystwyth PC defence - looks a safe PC hold
    Daventry Tory defence - looks safe, would be an upset if the Tories lose
    Westbury - LibDem defence - looks safe
    Richmond on Thames - LibDem defence - looks safe
    Ashford, Kent - Tory defence - looks a chance for a LibDem or Green upset

    I'd tend to agree on Westbury. An independent minded town but it has been safeish LD seat since creation, the candidate is well known locally and there are 2 independents which unless one takes heavily from the LDs would suggest they might be fishing for the same votes.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 51,884

    There is no good outcome from here. The country is going to be consumed by Brexit for many years to come, with no stable settlement in sight.

    While knife crime increases, NI has no government and HS2 is in jeopardy.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,679

    Not exactly a masterstroke designed to build trust in our presumptive Prime Minister. The unravelling is getting at least as much publicity as the stunt itself.
    I reckon he'll regularly have to come back to Parliament for saying something deeply misleading/inaccurate at the despatch box
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163

    I have a dear friend who was told to “go back to where you come from” yesterday.

    Did this happen before 2016? Surely.
    What’s different is that nativism has been legitimated.

    If it happened before there is no difference.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869

    IanB2 said:

    Tuesday’s LibDem hold in Cardiff:

    LD 1920 [55.3%; +18.9%]
    Con 838 [24.1%; -11.9%]
    Lab 560 [16.1%; -3.3%]
    PC 152 [4.4% +4.4%]
    Grn 0 [[0.0%; -8.1%]]

    I assume the Green candidate didn’t live in the ward...

    Zero votes for a candidate from a national party! How often does that happen?
    Hardly ever - especially in a BIG ward pulling in 3,500 votes in a by-election.

    It gives the lie to those PB’ers who suggest that Green supporters aren’t willing to vote LibDem. Brexit is the overriding issue and in a key defence not one Green supporter stuck with their previous choice.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    edited July 2019

    Not exactly a masterstroke designed to build trust in our presumptive Prime Minister. The unravelling is getting at least as much publicity as the stunt itself.
    I reckon he'll regularly have to come back to Parliament for saying something deeply misleading/inaccurate at the despatch box
    Given he would dearly love to be like Trump I would bet he will hate that as a member of parliament he has to go to it himself quite often, Trump at least can avoid going to Congress most of the time.
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483

    There is no good outcome from here. The country is going to be consumed by Brexit for many years to come, with no stable settlement in sight.

    This is why I'm leaning to No Deal.

    I think they country will stomach it for six months max, and then we'll rejoin, and the Leavers will have no credibility to oppose it.

    Every time they'll say no, rejoining will be a disaster, the country will remind them they said No Deal was Project Fear and/or No Deal will be fine.
    I have some sympathy for that view but I have three professional children trying to make their way in a difficult world and given the sectors they work in a no deal exit could scupper them for years to come, ok you can tell me where the sunlit uplands are but that view is disappearing of the agenda as principle overtakes sanity. I’m protected apart from a limited exposure living in Spain but I’m still waiting for someone to come up with a sane argument to leave which is based around economics, or one that gives those who voted for it what they sought to achieve.
  • StreeterStreeter Posts: 684
    Catching up. Has @HYUFD worked out the new certainty yet?
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869
    nichomar said:

    There is no good outcome from here. The country is going to be consumed by Brexit for many years to come, with no stable settlement in sight.

    This is why I'm leaning to No Deal.

    I think they country will stomach it for six months max, and then we'll rejoin, and the Leavers will have no credibility to oppose it.

    Every time they'll say no, rejoining will be a disaster, the country will remind them they said No Deal was Project Fear and/or No Deal will be fine.
    I have some sympathy for that view but I have three professional children trying to make their way in a difficult world and given the sectors they work in a no deal exit could scupper them for years to come, ok you can tell me where the sunlit uplands are but that view is disappearing of the agenda as principle overtakes sanity. I’m protected apart from a limited exposure living in Spain but I’m still waiting for someone to come up with a sane argument to leave which is based around economics, or one that gives those who voted for it what they sought to achieve.
    It’s a sign of the extent of the surrender of Tory politicians to the opinions of their pensioner base, all long departed from participation in the labour market, that so many of their MPs are so blasé as to the potential impact of no deal on very many people still of working age.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,679
    nichomar said:

    There is no good outcome from here. The country is going to be consumed by Brexit for many years to come, with no stable settlement in sight.

    This is why I'm leaning to No Deal.

    I think they country will stomach it for six months max, and then we'll rejoin, and the Leavers will have no credibility to oppose it.

    Every time they'll say no, rejoining will be a disaster, the country will remind them they said No Deal was Project Fear and/or No Deal will be fine.
    I have some sympathy for that view but I have three professional children trying to make their way in a difficult world and given the sectors they work in a no deal exit could scupper them for years to come, ok you can tell me where the sunlit uplands are but that view is disappearing of the agenda as principle overtakes sanity. I’m protected apart from a limited exposure living in Spain but I’m still waiting for someone to come up with a sane argument to leave which is based around economics, or one that gives those who voted for it what they sought to achieve.
    There's no good option from this point, all that there is left is minimising the disruption for a shorter time as possible.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 51,884
    IanB2 said:

    IanB2 said:

    Tuesday’s LibDem hold in Cardiff:

    LD 1920 [55.3%; +18.9%]
    Con 838 [24.1%; -11.9%]
    Lab 560 [16.1%; -3.3%]
    PC 152 [4.4% +4.4%]
    Grn 0 [[0.0%; -8.1%]]

    I assume the Green candidate didn’t live in the ward...

    Zero votes for a candidate from a national party! How often does that happen?
    Hardly ever - especially in a BIG ward pulling in 3,500 votes in a by-election.

    It gives the lie to those PB’ers who suggest that Green supporters aren’t willing to vote LibDem. Brexit is the overriding issue and in a key defence not one Green supporter stuck with their previous choice.
    Not even the candidate him/herself :lol:
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,237

    You know, I peeked into the 'other' PB.com a little while ago. Goodness, what a civilised place that was compared to here.

    SeanT is still there, ranting admittedly but still there. TSE is still got a raging..... well, he still likes Cameron. And the discussions are civil. All the talk is about how Osborne is the shoe in against May. He basically got to pick his opponent, and Theresa May, well she might've been okay as Home Secretary but as PM material she'll never beat the Boy Wonder.

    Announcement of that Leadership contest is during Conference season and its widely expected Osborne will win, win handily and then go on to beat Corbyn in 2020 for his majority. Sure, Farage and UKIP are still a threat but three years later after the 52% Remain win, the country is moving on.

    And Osborne's win next year will mean the end of Corbyn and hopefully the Labour party can get back on its feet again. There's talk Benn or Watson will take over, or even Ed make a return.

    Of course, the Lib Dems are still struggling on 10%, but Farron can't have it all.


    What a civilised place that place is!

    They could do a remake of the Man in the High Castle set in Brexitlandia 2030 where people can travel between that reality and a different world in which Remain won.
    There would be a lot of refugees desperately trying to escape from Remainica to Brexitlandia
    Personally I'd be using this alternate universe switcher to seek out rather more interesting places that Remainica and Brexlandia!
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,733

    nico67 said:

    In terms of revoke .

    As a Remainer this is a horrible option and if I was an MP it would fill me with dread .

    I admit I’d love to see Brexit put out of its misery but I strongly believe that can only happen with another EU referendum .

    I think it’s wrong to think MPs would easily revoke over no deal , because if people like me who couldn’t be more pro EU have serious reservations over this then what must MPs be dealing with .

    I’m confident there’s the numbers to stop no deal by legislation but on revoke I’m really not sure .

    I suppose a lot depends on external events , what the pounds doing , business etc

    In reality, almost no one believes it acceptable to simply “Revoke” which is why talk of “extreme Remainers” is rather tedious.
    6 million signed the Revoke petition :)
This discussion has been closed.