Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » YouGov LAB party members polling finds that just 45% backed th

SystemSystem Posts: 12,171
edited May 2019 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » YouGov LAB party members polling finds that just 45% backed the party last Thursday

Question for ?@UKLabour? – are you planning on expelling nearly half the membership? pic.twitter.com/I3z6ZOpF59

Read the full story here


«13456

Comments

  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,679
    edited May 2019
    The Tory figure is even more 'interesting'

    https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1134129655420739585
  • Scrapheap_as_wasScrapheap_as_was Posts: 10,069
    COYS
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163

    The Tory figure is even more 'interesting'



    But not as surprising. Most Conservatives seemed to think voting Conservative at the Euros was not a very Conservative thing to do. Labour's core vote was presumed to be a little stronger.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,381
    Remarkably, I'm one of the 19%. I've said before, and I'll say again, I'm surprised at the way I've suddenly been outflanked by people who I would once have considered to be well to my left.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,679

    COYS

    Am relaxed about Spurs winning.

    It will mean Piers Morgan will probably self combust when Spurs win the European Cup before his beloved Arsenal.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    Just finished updating the leadership spreadsheet, and now I have to add another name with Jesse Norman entering the race.
  • Scrapheap_as_wasScrapheap_as_was Posts: 10,069
    > @TheScreamingEagles said:
    > COYS
    >
    > Am relaxed about Spurs winning.
    >
    > It will mean Piers Morgan will probably self combust when Spurs win the European Cup before his beloved Arsenal.

    Wise words.
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 26,624
    > @Sean_F said:
    > Remarkably, I'm one of the 19%. I've said before, and I'll say again, I'm surprised at the way I've suddenly been outflanked by people who I would once have considered to be well to my left.

    I changed from UKIP in 2014 to Conservative in 2019.

    I struggle to understand those who have moved from Remain to No Deal.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,038
    > @Sean_F said:
    > Remarkably, I'm one of the 19%. I've said before, and I'll say again, I'm surprised at the way I've suddenly been outflanked by people who I would once have considered to be well to my left.

    I'm also one of the 19%.

    Or maybe a different 19%!
  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    Remarkably the figures imply that about one in every twenty voters for the Green Party at the European elections was a member of the Labour Party.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156
    Cherie Blair also revealed to have joined Campbell in voting LD while former Labour Cabinet Ministers Charles Clarke and Bob Ainsworth and ex-minister Fiona Mactaggart also voted for non-Labour Remain parties. Tony Blair though voted Labour albeit without much enthusiasm

    https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/revealed-cherie-blair-voted-for-lib-dems-in-european-elections-a4154996.html
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 26,624
    > @AndyJS said:
    > Just finished updating the leadership spreadsheet, and now I have to add another name with Jesse Norman entering the race.

    I think he'd struggle to be a household name in his own house.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156
    > @TheScreamingEagles said:
    > The Tory figure is even more 'interesting'
    >
    > https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1134129655420739585

    Those figures show why if the Tories do not deliver Brexit they face a 1993 Canada style wipeout to the Brexit Party whom a majority of Tory members and 2017 Tory voters voted for last week.

    The fact over a third of Labour members voted LD or Green shows the LDs could replace Labour as the main centre left party on an EUref2 or revoke ticket but Labour would still avoid wipeout, even though it lost local authorities to the Brexit Party and LDs last week it still won some, the Tories won none
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,237
    > @another_richard said:
    > > @Sean_F said:
    > > Remarkably, I'm one of the 19%. I've said before, and I'll say again, I'm surprised at the way I've suddenly been outflanked by people who I would once have considered to be well to my left.
    >
    > I changed from UKIP in 2014 to Conservative in 2019.
    >
    > I struggle to understand those who have moved from Remain to No Deal.

    I totally get that people are frustrated that we haven't left yet. What I don't understand is people who are determined to veto something that is 80% of what they want (and with the likelihood they'll get the other 20% in the next few years) against the the risk of getting nothing.

    I also don't understand why people across the spectrum are failing to realise that by not working to get something that is accepted by 70% of the population, they are storing up trouble for later. Remainers who think that if they get Brexit cancelled now, then it will just go away. Leavers who think that by throwing no bone to Remainers and those in the centre, won't be resented for years to come.
  • QuincelQuincel Posts: 4,042
    So if 'only' 15% of Lab members voted LD, and only 7% of Tory members voted for anyone other than Tory/TBP, where did the Lib Dem 20% vote share come from? My guess is that both parties would have much bigger defections to the LDs from non-member voters.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,720
    > @Quincel said:
    > So if 'only' 15% of Lab members voted LD, and only 7% of Tory members voted for anyone other than Tory/TBP, where did the Lib Dem 20% vote share come from? My guess is that both parties would have much bigger defections to the LDs from non-member voters.

    Party members are a minority of voters.
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,698
    HYUFD said:

    > @TheScreamingEagles said:

    > The Tory figure is even more 'interesting'

    >

    >





    Those figures show why if the Tories do not deliver Brexit they face a 1993 Canada style wipeout to the Brexit Party whom a majority of Tory members and 2017 Tory voters voted for last week.



    The fact over a third of Labour members voted LD or Green shows the LDs could replace Labour as the main centre left party on an EUref2 or revoke ticket but Labour would still avoid wipeout, even though it lost local authorities to the Brexit Party and LDs last week it still won some, the Tories won none
    You are confusing members with voters. Ashcroft's analysis is more useful.



    https://www.conservativehome.com/platform/2019/05/lord-ashcroft-my-eu-election-poll-most-former-tory-voters-say-they-will-stay-with-their-new-party-at-the-next-election.html
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 26,624
    > @rcs1000 said:
    > > @another_richard said:
    > > > @Sean_F said:
    > > > Remarkably, I'm one of the 19%. I've said before, and I'll say again, I'm surprised at the way I've suddenly been outflanked by people who I would once have considered to be well to my left.
    > >
    > > I changed from UKIP in 2014 to Conservative in 2019.
    > >
    > > I struggle to understand those who have moved from Remain to No Deal.
    >
    > I totally get that people are frustrated that we haven't left yet. What I don't understand is people who are determined to veto something that is 80% of what they want (and with the likelihood they'll get the other 20% in the next few years) against the the risk of getting nothing.
    >
    > I also don't understand why people across the spectrum are failing to realise that by not working to get something that is accepted by 70% of the population, they are storing up trouble for later. Remainers who think that if they get Brexit cancelled now, then it will just go away. Leavers who think that by throwing no bone to Remainers and those in the centre, won't be resented for years to come.

    Indeed.

    There are also those No Dealers who assume that rejoining could not happen and so don't show any interest in the practicalities of No Deal.
  • nunuonenunuone Posts: 1,138
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,698
    edited May 2019
    Quincel said:

    So if 'only' 15% of Lab members voted LD, and only 7% of Tory members voted for anyone other than Tory/TBP, where did the Lib Dem 20% vote share come from? My guess is that both parties would have much bigger defections to the LDs from non-member voters.

    Members are <1% of the typical GE votes for the main parties, so irrelevant for predicting future GEs.

    Where they become all too relevant is in selecting party leaders (and thus party policy direction and tone) as we are about to see.
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527
    The key point is not how these party members voted , but whether they reveal that in public.
  • oxfordsimonoxfordsimon Posts: 5,842
    > @nunuone said:
    > How is she getting away with this grift?
    >
    > https://mobile.twitter.com/Rachael_Swindon/status/1134155409890189312

    And people will fall for it
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    edited May 2019
    rcs1000 said:

    > @another_richard said:

    > > @Sean_F said:

    > > Remarkably, I'm one of the 19%. I've said before, and I'll say again, I'm surprised at the way I've suddenly been outflanked by people who I would once have considered to be well to my left.

    >

    > I changed from UKIP in 2014 to Conservative in 2019.

    >

    > I struggle to understand those who have moved from Remain to No Deal.



    I totally get that people are frustrated that we haven't left yet. What I don't understand is people who are determined to veto something that is 80% of what they want (and with the likelihood they'll get the other 20% in the next few years) against the the risk of getting nothing.



    I also don't understand why people across the spectrum are failing to realise that by not working to get something that is accepted by 70% of the population, they are storing up trouble for later. Remainers who think that if they get Brexit cancelled now, then it will just go away. Leavers who think that by throwing no bone to Remainers and those in the centre, won't be resented for years to come.

    People think compromise is weakness. They'd rather get nothing than something. Simple as that.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,131
    edited May 2019
    I don't have a pet (they die) nor a plant (they die). I have books (so far not dead) instead. Is £400 a lot for a cat?
  • ByronicByronic Posts: 3,578
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156
    edited May 2019
    President Trump praises his 'friends' Boris Johnson and Nigel Farage and calls them 'good guys' and says he might meet them.on his state visit next month. The President also congratulated Farage on his 'big win' in the European Parliament elections in the UK

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-48462677
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    Byronic said:
    Is it real?
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156
    > @Byronic said:
    > Why aren't you talking about this?
    >
    > https://twitter.com/GuidoFawkes/status/1134151393764360192

    Realignment has arrived until we decide on Brexit
  • ByronicByronic Posts: 3,578
    edited May 2019
    > @nichomar said:
    > Why aren't you talking about this?
    >
    >
    >
    > https://twitter.com/GuidoFawkes/status/1134151393764360192
    >
    >
    >
    > Is it real?<

    ++++

    No idea. But Guido has good sources.

    It's also quite believable. What happened to Scottish politics post indyref is happening to the UK, as a whole, post euro-ref.


    EDIT: *might* be happening. It is just rumour at the moment. But what a delicious rumour.
  • QuincelQuincel Posts: 4,042
    > @viewcode said:
    > https://mobile.twitter.com/Rachael_Swindon/status/1134155409890189312
    > And people will fall for it
    >
    > I don't have a pet (they die) nor a plant (they die). I have books (so far not dead) instead. Is £400 a lot for a cat?

    No idea if she has a cat or not, but £400 for vets fees aren't that high if the cat has anything at all major wrong.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,679
    Have I mentioned Mike's holiday begins tomorrow?
  • eekeek Posts: 28,406
    > @HYUFD said:
    > > @Byronic said:
    > > Why aren't you talking about this?
    > >
    > > https://twitter.com/GuidoFawkes/status/1134151393764360192
    >
    > Realignment has arrived until we decide on Brexit

    Realignment has arrived. The extent of the impact really does depend on how quickly Brexit does or does not occur.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    HYUFD said:

    > @Byronic said:

    > Why aren't you talking about this?

    >

    >





    Electoral Calculus says those figures make the Brexit Party the largest party under FPTP on 223, Labour second on 185, LDs still third on 75, then SNP 4th on 55.

    As hard as it would be to predict numbers on those sorts of vote shares, it does rather suggest why Labour are more willing to roll the dice.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,131
    Quincel said:

    > @viewcode said:

    > https://mobile.twitter.com/Rachael_Swindon/status/1134155409890189312

    > And people will fall for it

    >

    > I don't have a pet (they die) nor a plant (they die). I have books (so far not dead) instead. Is £400 a lot for a cat?



    No idea if she has a cat or not, but £400 for vets fees aren't that high if the cat has anything at all major wrong.

    Good to know, thank you

    [Note to self. Do not buy cat]
  • TheWhiteRabbitTheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,454
    > @nichomar said:
    > Why aren't you talking about this?
    >
    >
    >
    > https://twitter.com/GuidoFawkes/status/1134151393764360192
    >
    >
    >
    > Is it real?

    We'll find out later, but either way it's not "real", because there is no election tomorrow and we are very far from one
  • CatManCatMan Posts: 3,060
    > @viewcode said:
    >
    > Good to know, thank you
    >
    > [Note to self. Do not buy cat]

    Cats are ace! But no, don't buy one, get a rescue cat :)
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,679
    viewcode said:

    Quincel said:

    > @viewcode said:

    > https://mobile.twitter.com/Rachael_Swindon/status/1134155409890189312

    > And people will fall for it

    >

    > I don't have a pet (they die) nor a plant (they die). I have books (so far not dead) instead. Is £400 a lot for a cat?



    No idea if she has a cat or not, but £400 for vets fees aren't that high if the cat has anything at all major wrong.

    Good to know, thank you

    [Note to self. Do not buy cat]
    Cats are like strippers.

    They'll sit in your lap but you aren't allowed to touch them, they both cost a lot of money.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,720
    It's brilliant to see the destructive energy of Brexit finally finding some of the right targets.
  • ByronicByronic Posts: 3,578
    > @TheWhiteRabbit said:
    > > @nichomar said:
    > > Why aren't you talking about this?
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > https://twitter.com/GuidoFawkes/status/1134151393764360192
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > Is it real?
    >
    > We'll find out later, but either way it's not "real", because there is no election tomorrow and we are very far from one<

    ====

    Very far from one?? At most we are three years from an election, that's not eternity. Also, as you might have noted, the government has no majority, and has to force through a policy disliked by a large number of MPs, so it could fall at any time. And then we have an election.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163

    > @nichomar said:

    > Why aren't you talking about this?

    >

    >

    >

    >



    >

    >

    >

    > Is it real?



    We'll find out later, but either way it's not "real", because there is no election tomorrow and we are very far from one
    You and I obviously have differernt definitions of how far away 'very far' is.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,131
    edited May 2019
    CatMan said:

    Cats are ace! But no, don't buy one, get a rescue cat :)

    I may regret starting this conversation, but...rescue cat?
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,720
    > @Byronic said:
    >
    > Very far from one?? At most we are three years from an election, that's not eternity. Also, as you might have noted, the government has no majority, and has to force through a policy disliked by a large number of MPs, so it could fall at any time. And then we have an election.
    >
    -----

    In would only take a handful of MPs who want to embrace the realignment to trigger a General Election. It could come much sooner than anyone expects.
  • CatManCatMan Posts: 3,060
    edited May 2019
    > @viewcode said:

    > I may regret starting this conversation, but...rescue cat?

    Heh, a cat from a shelter. Lots of strays and people who dump cats or the owner dies/gets too ill to look after them.
  • oxfordsimonoxfordsimon Posts: 5,842
    > @viewcode said:
    > Cats are ace! But no, don't buy one, get a rescue cat :)
    >
    > I may regret starting this conversation, but...rescue cat?

    A cat being rehomed by a shelter or similar charity - rather than buying a pedigree kitten from a breeder.
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,293
    > @HYUFD said:
    > > @HYUFD said:
    > > > @Byronic said:
    > > > Why aren't you talking about this?
    > > >
    > > > https://twitter.com/GuidoFawkes/status/1134151393764360192
    > >
    > > Electoral Calculus says those figures make the Labour Party the largest party under FPTP on 202, Brexit Party second on 137, Tories third on 117, LDs up but only to 115, then SNP on 55
    > >
    >
    >
    > https://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/cgi-bin/usercode.py?CON=19&amp;LAB=19&amp;LIB=22&amp;UKIP=1.9&amp;Green=1.7&amp;ChUK=0.0&amp;Brexit=24&amp;TVCON=&amp;TVLAB=&amp;TVLIB=&amp;TVUKIP=&amp;TVGreen=&amp;TVChUK=&amp;TVBrexit=&amp;SCOTCON=&amp;SCOTLAB=&amp;SCOTLIB=&amp;SCOTUKIP=&amp;SCOTGreen=&amp;SCOTChUK=&amp;SCOTBrexit=&amp;SCOTNAT=&amp;display=AllChanged&amp;regorseat=(none)&amp;boundary=2017base
    >
    Lab/Brexit Party coalition?

    That would be interesting. :D
  • QuincelQuincel Posts: 4,042
    > @TheScreamingEagles said:
    > > @viewcode said:
    >
    > > https://mobile.twitter.com/Rachael_Swindon/status/1134155409890189312
    >
    > > And people will fall for it
    >
    > >
    >
    > > I don't have a pet (they die) nor a plant (they die). I have books (so far not dead) instead. Is £400 a lot for a cat?
    >
    >
    >
    > No idea if she has a cat or not, but £400 for vets fees aren't that high if the cat has anything at all major wrong.
    >
    > Good to know, thank you
    >
    > [Note to self. Do not buy cat]
    >
    > Cats are like strippers.
    >
    > They'll sit in your lap but you aren't allowed to touch them, they both cost a lot of money.

    This is the first post on here I've ever 'Liked'.

    On which note, how long has that Like button been there?
  • Ishmael_ZIshmael_Z Posts: 8,981
    Most astonishingly of all from Ashcroft

    "Only one in three (32 per cent) of 2017 Tories who switched to the Brexit
    Party said they would come home at the next general election; 52 per cent currently say they will stay with the Brexit Party. Conservatives who switched to the Lib Dems say they are even more likely to stay put: 61 per cent now say they will vote Lib Dem again at the general election, with only 22 per cent saying they expect to return to the Tories."

    So: not, the Tories are doomed if they don't deliver brexit, but: the Tories are doomed.

    Figures a bit odd, I think it means 52% of everyone but 61% of lib dem voters.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    > @Quincel said:
    > > @TheScreamingEagles said:
    > > > @viewcode said:
    > >
    > > > https://mobile.twitter.com/Rachael_Swindon/status/1134155409890189312
    > >
    > > > And people will fall for it
    > >
    > > >
    > >
    > > > I don't have a pet (they die) nor a plant (they die). I have books (so far not dead) instead. Is £400 a lot for a cat?
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > No idea if she has a cat or not, but £400 for vets fees aren't that high if the cat has anything at all major wrong.
    > >
    > > Good to know, thank you
    > >
    > > [Note to self. Do not buy cat]
    > >
    > > Cats are like strippers.
    > >
    > > They'll sit in your lap but you aren't allowed to touch them, they both cost a lot of money.
    >
    > This is the first post on here I've ever 'Liked'.
    >
    > On which note, how long has that Like button been there?
    ------------------------------------------
    A few weeks or so. At the cost of a messed up quoting system!
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156
    edited May 2019
    > @kle4 said:
    > > @Byronic said:
    >
    > > Why aren't you talking about this?
    >
    > >
    >
    > > https://twitter.com/GuidoFawkes/status/1134151393764360192
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Electoral Calculus says those figures make the Labour Party the largest party under FPTP on 202, Brexit Party second on 137, Tories third on 117, LDs fourth on 115 and then SNP on 55.
    >
    >
    >
    > As hard as it would be to predict numbers on those sorts of vote shares, it does rather suggest why Labour are more willing to roll the dice.

    Ignore my last post, Labour would be first and the Brexit Party second, Tories third and LDs 4th (trying to calculate on the train and lost connection, apologies).

    Labour and LD and SNP coalition the likely outcome from that
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 42,005
    > @Byronic said:
    > > @nichomar said:
    > > Why aren't you talking about this?
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > https://twitter.com/GuidoFawkes/status/1134151393764360192
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > Is it real?<
    >
    > ++++
    >
    > No idea. But Guido has good sources.
    >
    > It's also quite believable. What happened to Scottish politics post indyref is happening to the UK, as a whole, post euro-ref.
    >
    >
    > EDIT: *might* be happening. It is just rumour at the moment. But what a delicious rumour.


    Except it's 4 snarling fearful parties taking chunks out of each other rather than one party stomping on the diddy ones. Probably more entertaining, all in all.
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,318
    AndyJS said:

    Just finished updating the leadership spreadsheet, and now I have to add another name with Jesse Norman entering the race.

    When I mentioned this to my son just now, he thought I was referring to the American opera singer. Honestly, we could do a lot worse.

    (The MP has written two good books on Edmund Burke and Adam Smith. Not sure how good he is at singing though.)
  • DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    > @nunuone said:
    > How is she getting away with this grift?
    >
    > https://mobile.twitter.com/Rachael_Swindon/status/1134155409890189312

    Dunno. It might be grift and it might be genuine and it might be both. Some people have no savings and live from pay cheque to pay cheque. And when I say some I mean many. One unexpected bill wipes out their savings; a second drives them to the moneylenders.

    Just this afternoon the woman in front of me at the supermarket checkout discovered she did not have enough money. She was embarrassed and I was frustrated at the delay while she negotiated with her small children and the cashier what should go back (so frustrated I paid the difference).

    These people might be poor, or they might be the middle-class JAMs Theresa May wanted to help before she got sidetracked by Brexit. Mostly they have played by the rules and paid attention at school and gone out to work, but life's unfair and globalisation or (more often) automation has taken away the best jobs, and their wages have stagnated/ You can see why they'd fall for a snake oil salesman selling Brexit or Trumpism or Islamism or any other simplistic analysis.
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    HYUFD said:

    > @kle4 said:

    > > @Byronic said:

    >

    > > Why aren't you talking about this?

    >

    > >

    >

    > >



    >

    >

    >

    >

    >

    > Electoral Calculus says those figures make the Labour Party the largest party under FPTP on 202, Brexit Party second on 137, Tories third on 117, LDs fourth on 115 and then SNP on 55.

    >

    >

    >

    > As hard as it would be to predict numbers on those sorts of vote shares, it does rather suggest why Labour are more willing to roll the dice.



    Ignore my last post, Labour would be first and the Brexit Party second, Tories third and LDs 4th (trying to calculate on the train and lost connection, apologies).



    Labour and LD and SNP coalition the likely outcome from that
    Never with Corby in charge from lib dem perspective
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527
    Yougov did understate Labour a bit in the EU elections.
  • ByronicByronic Posts: 3,578
    > @Theuniondivvie said:
    > >
    > > EDIT: *might* be happening. It is just rumour at the moment. But what a delicious rumour.
    >
    >
    > Except it's 4 snarling fearful parties taking chunks out of each other rather than one party stomping on the diddy ones. Probably more entertaining, all in all. <

    ++++

    Not sure you could ever call the Lib Dems "snarling", but yes, it is highly entertaining, like a kind of dystopian political bloodsport. More!
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,131
    @CatMan , @oxfordsimon

    Thank you. I thought a rescue cat was a cat that rescues things, not a cat that has been rescued. I learn something new every day.
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 4,502
    edited May 2019
    Whether that You Gov is confirmed Labour are in danger of cementing more Labour Remainers moving to the Lib Dems .

    And with today’s nonsense from Corbyn he really is doing his best to help them.

    It seems that no matter how many facts you throw at him and Milne they live in their Lexiteer bubble . Labour are losing four times as many Remainers than Leavers .
  • eekeek Posts: 28,406
    > @TheWhiteRabbit said:
    > > @nichomar said:
    > > Why aren't you talking about this?
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > https://twitter.com/GuidoFawkes/status/1134151393764360192
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > Is it real?
    >
    > We'll find out later, but either way it's not "real", because there is no election tomorrow and we are very far from one

    With that survey we are an awful lot further away than we were on Monday - were the new Tory leader to call a general election it's no longer a brave decision, it's a suicidal one...
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,720
    > @nico67 said:
    > Whether that You Gov is confirmed Labour are in danger of cementing more Labour Remainers moving to the Lib Dems .
    >
    > And with today’s nonsense from Corbyn he really is doing his best to help them.
    >
    > It seems that no matter how many facts you throw at him and Milne they live in their Lexiteer bubble . Labour are losing four times as many Remainers to Leavers .

    The crucial thing that embeds this shift is that Tory Remainers are also going to the Lib Dems, and Labour Leavers are going to the Brexit Party, albeit in smaller numbers. That means that any shift of the major parties to try to counteract what's happening will just make it worse. They are both stuffed.
  • FenmanFenman Posts: 1,047
    > @rcs1000 said:
    > > @another_richard said:
    > > > @Sean_F said:
    > > > Remarkably, I'm one of the 19%. I've said before, and I'll say again, I'm surprised at the way I've suddenly been outflanked by people who I would once have considered to be well to my left.
    > >
    > > I changed from UKIP in 2014 to Conservative in 2019.
    > >
    > > I struggle to understand those who have moved from Remain to No Deal.
    >
    > I totally get that people are frustrated that we haven't left yet. What I don't understand is people who are determined to veto something that is 80% of what they want (and with the likelihood they'll get the other 20% in the next few years) against the the risk of getting nothing.
    >
    > I also don't understand why people across the spectrum are failing to realise that by not working to get something that is accepted by 70% of the population, they are storing up trouble for later. Remainers who think that if they get Brexit cancelled now, then it will just go away. Leavers who think that by throwing no bone to Remainers and those in the centre, won't be resented for years to come.

    Who leaked this question from next month's Maths A level?
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    edited May 2019
    eek said:

    > @TheWhiteRabbit said:

    > > @nichomar said:

    > > Why aren't you talking about this?

    > >

    > >

    > >

    > >



    > >

    > >

    > >

    > > Is it real?

    >

    > We'll find out later, but either way it's not "real", because there is no election tomorrow and we are very far from one



    With that survey we are an awful lot further away than we were on Monday - were the new Tory leader to call a general election it's no longer a brave decision, it's a suicidal one...
    Except it is not about whether a new Tory leader would call for one or not. It's the fundamental point that the WA is not passing in its current form, and Parliament seems dead set against no deal, so unless a new Tory leader finds out the EU has been engaged in the most epic bluff of all time, or they remarkably switch to an option Labour back, in defiance of everything their members want and probably of promises they are about to make in the leadership contest, the government could fall and an election happen by default.

    Sure, on numbers like this Labour won't want one either, but the new deadline will be coming up in October, and something has to give - unless a bunch of MPs become accepting of no deal/referendum or the WA, the government will not have a majority for anything and an election might occur. Particularly when Labour have reason to worry, but also know the Tories will be hurt worse.

    We're no further away from an election because of polls like this unless it leads to the various sides giving in. Do you see any sign of that? I sure do not.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,720
    > @rcs1000 said:
    >
    > Leavers who think that by throwing no bone to Remainers and those in the centre, won't be resented for years to come.
    >
    --------

    The main bone Leavers could throw starts with saying, "I'm sorry, I might have misjudged this..." but their need for validation prevents that.
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    Klopp speaks sense
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    edited May 2019
    nico67 said:

    Labour are losing four times as many Remainers than Leavers .

    Well, in that case the balance of remainers and leavers should be getting more even then, making them more representative of the county as a whole :)

  • kyf_100kyf_100 Posts: 4,951
    > @eek said:
    > > @TheWhiteRabbit said:
    > > > @nichomar said:
    > > > Why aren't you talking about this?
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > https://twitter.com/GuidoFawkes/status/1134151393764360192
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > Is it real?
    > >
    > > We'll find out later, but either way it's not "real", because there is no election tomorrow and we are very far from one
    >
    > With that survey we are an awful lot further away than we were on Monday - were the new Tory leader to call a general election it's no longer a brave decision, it's a suicidal one...

    If the Tories call an election before Brexit happens, my guess is the results will not just look a bit like the %ages for the Euro elections last week, but will actually polarise further.

    Under FPTP it's winner takes all. Which means that even if Brexit isn't your primary motivator for voting, it makes sense to either back the Lib Dems (to stop Farage / the right wing) or Brexit Party (once it becomes clear the Tories cannot win a GE).

    Exciting times.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    Old allegiances are breaking down. Some diehard party loyalists on both sides are among the last to notice precisely because they don’t feel the new dividing lines in the same way.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,491
    > @rcs1000 said:
    > > @another_richard said:
    > > > @Sean_F said:
    > > > Remarkably, I'm one of the 19%. I've said before, and I'll say again, I'm surprised at the way I've suddenly been outflanked by people who I would once have considered to be well to my left.
    > >
    > > I changed from UKIP in 2014 to Conservative in 2019.
    > >
    > > I struggle to understand those who have moved from Remain to No Deal.
    >
    > I totally get that people are frustrated that we haven't left yet. What I don't understand is people who are determined to veto something that is 80% of what they want (and with the likelihood they'll get the other 20% in the next few years) against the the risk of getting nothing.
    >
    > I also don't understand why people across the spectrum are failing to realise that by not working to get something that is accepted by 70% of the population, they are storing up trouble for later. Remainers who think that if they get Brexit cancelled now, then it will just go away. Leavers who think that by throwing no bone to Remainers and those in the centre, won't be resented for years to come.

    Because they are fanatical maniacs.
  • ByronicByronic Posts: 3,578
    > @williamglenn said:

    >
    > The crucial thing that embeds this shift is that Tory Remainers are also going to the Lib Dems, and Labour Leavers are going to the Brexit Party, albeit in smaller numbers. That means that any shift of the major parties to try to counteract what's happening will just make it worse. They are both stuffed. <

    +++++

    There is a difference, however. The Tories have an exit route out of disaster, Labour do not, or at least not at the moment.

    The Tories have to deliver some kind of Brexit (yes that is hard, but it is do-able). if that happens they might expect to recover, at least partly. Labour, by contrast, are stuck with a leader who refuses to take a firm position, thus alienating all sides of the argument (AND he's a sinister old Trot). Labour are stuffed until they get rid of Jeremy, and there is no obvious way of ditching Jeremy.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,238
    FPT, @Charles ...
    “I was in a meeting talking about developing vaccines for ASF. Sorry you weren’t my #1 priority...”

    No problem; I didn’t think for a moment I would be.
    My concern was that you were contributing what sounded a lot like FUD to the MMR debate, and I enquired about supporting data.

    I thought it might be a simple question for you.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    @nichomar

    Morristown is lovely, up there with Summit. Parsippany is a few miles to the north but a whole lot less nice
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,491
    > @Sean_F said:
    > Remarkably, I'm one of the 19%. I've said before, and I'll say again, I'm surprised at the way I've suddenly been outflanked by people who I would once have considered to be well to my left.

    Me too.

    And, I'm convinced some of them are still to my Left as well.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,468
    a Swiss, single market Brexit would please nobody but be acceptable to 70% of the population. Has been the clear way forward since the referendum.
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    @TheScreamingEagles said:

    "Have I mentioned Mike's holiday begins tomorrow?"

    ...............................................................................

    LibDems should pay Mike Smithson to stay on holiday for the rest of the year.... :smiley:
  • solarflaresolarflare Posts: 3,710
    When is the actual Times/Yougov poll expected?
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,720
    > @Gallowgate said:
    > a Swiss, single market Brexit would please nobody but be acceptable to 70% of the population. Has been the clear way forward since the referendum.
    ------

    It was made impossible by a Leave campaign that focussed on immigration. That's been clear since before the referendum.
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    Charles said:

    @nichomar

    Morristown is lovely, up there with Summit. Parsippany is a few miles to the north but a whole lot less nice

    Spent a lot of time working one week in four at Budd Lake really loved the place have had many good nights out in and around.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    Byronic said:

    > @williamglenn said:



    >

    > The crucial thing that embeds this shift is that Tory Remainers are also going to the Lib Dems, and Labour Leavers are going to the Brexit Party, albeit in smaller numbers. That means that any shift of the major parties to try to counteract what's happening will just make it worse. They are both stuffed. <



    +++++



    There is a difference, however. The Tories have an exit route out of disaster, Labour do not, or at least not at the moment.



    The Tories have to deliver some kind of Brexit (yes that is hard, but it is do-able). if that happens they might expect to recover, at least partly. Labour, by contrast, are stuck with a leader who refuses to take a firm position, thus alienating all sides of the argument (AND he's a sinister old Trot). Labour are stuffed until they get rid of Jeremy, and there is no obvious way of ditching Jeremy.

    How, exactly, is Brexit doable at this point for the Tories?

    WA - dead
    Renegotiation - requiring the EU to fold despite holding firm this entire time
    No deal - parliament will act to prevent
    referendum - no Tory leader will be allowed to suggest it

    Only one of those options might get support from Tory MPs and see Brexit happen, and it is dependent on an external group doing exactly as they want.
  • kamskikamski Posts: 5,193
    EUSSR is a very telling nickname. Since the fall of the USSR the EU has been filling the role of Enemy/Hate Figure. If Brexit actually happens what will replace it?

    I sometimes think the best idea would be to to discover an alien invasion force heading for the earth (that will conveniently take a few years to get here) for us all to unite against.
  • notme2notme2 Posts: 1,006
    > @DecrepitJohnL said:
    > > @nunuone said:
    > > How is she getting away with this grift?
    > >
    > > https://mobile.twitter.com/Rachael_Swindon/status/1134155409890189312
    >
    > Dunno. It might be grift and it might be genuine and it might be both. Some people have no savings and live from pay cheque to pay cheque. And when I say some I mean many. One unexpected bill wipes out their savings; a second drives them to the moneylenders.
    >
    > Just this afternoon the woman in front of me at the supermarket checkout discovered she did not have enough money. She was embarrassed and I was frustrated at the delay while she negotiated with her small children and the cashier what should go back (so frustrated I paid the difference).
    >
    > These people might be poor, or they might be the middle-class JAMs Theresa May wanted to help before she got sidetracked by Brexit. Mostly they have played by the rules and paid attention at school and gone out to work, but life's unfair and globalisation or (more often) automation has taken away the best jobs, and their wages have stagnated/ You can see why they'd fall for a snake oil salesman selling Brexit or Trumpism or Islamism or any other simplistic analysis.


    Person at checkout doesn’t have enough for groceries. That’s like buses coming in twos or British Gas digging up the newly relaid road from the council. It’s no more a reason for brexit than a thousand other things.

    Maybe those voting to leave the European Union just wanted to leave the European Union?
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,318
    edited May 2019
    FPT

    In response to @TheKitchenCabinet who said this -

    “I am a Governor at a primary school where this has now become a hot topic as we have a similar demographic to some of the Birmingham schools. The view of many parents can be summed up by one's comment that "I brought my child to this country to get a good education, not so he can be taught it is fine to be gay.

    Logical argument won't get you far when you are dealing with that mentality.

    What I am annoyed at though is that the Government should have realised that this had the potential to cause trouble and it should have been ready to offer support and assistance where needed. Instead, schools and headteachers have been left out to dry and to cope with the backlash.”

    If that parent brought their child here from somewhere else then frankly they can go back there if they don’t like our education. If they're born here then they need to have the same education as every other British resident. And they need to be taught that being gay is not a choice, is normal and is fine.

    I totally agree that the silence of the authorities has been shameful.

    Even more, it looks as if some of the propaganda being spread by those protesting against the anti-bullying programme is utterly inaccurate and those spreading it have an agenda. Shades of how the Danish cartoons controversy was stirred up. But now the fight is on it is a fight the state must win.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,491
    Betfair unmoved by Jesse Norman so far.

    Still available at 300/1.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,468

    It was made impossible by a Leave campaign that focussed on immigration. That's been clear since before the referendum.

    Well then there is no middle ground! Grim.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    viewcode said:

    I don't have a pet (they die) nor a plant (they die). I have books (so far not dead) instead. Is £400 a lot for a cat?
    Not much - couple of diagnostics, vet and nurse fees, euthanasia and cremation would probably be that.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,491
    > @AlastairMeeks said:
    > Old allegiances are breaking down. Some diehard party loyalists on both sides are among the last to notice precisely because they don’t feel the new dividing lines in the same way.

    But, that works both ways.

    The right leader of either the Conservatives or Labour could capture the mood.
  • notme2notme2 Posts: 1,006
    > @oxfordsimon said:
    > > @nunuone said:
    > > How is she getting away with this grift?
    > >
    > > https://mobile.twitter.com/Rachael_Swindon/status/1134155409890189312
    >
    > And people will fall for it


    Standard shakedown.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,131
    kle4 said:

    nico67 said:

    Labour are losing four times as many Remainers than Leavers .

    Well, in that case the balance of remainers and leavers should be getting more even then, making them more representative of the county as a whole :)

    That's true. Labour might end up with 52 leavers and 48 Remainers as members

    Not percent. Just 100 members... :)

    [Puts on sunglasses, "The Who" on soundtrack...]
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    viewcode said:

    Quincel said:

    > @viewcode said:

    > https://mobile.twitter.com/Rachael_Swindon/status/1134155409890189312

    > And people will fall for it

    >

    > I don't have a pet (they die) nor a plant (they die). I have books (so far not dead) instead. Is £400 a lot for a cat?



    No idea if she has a cat or not, but £400 for vets fees aren't that high if the cat has anything at all major wrong.

    Good to know, thank you

    [Note to self. Do not buy cat]
    Cats are like strippers.

    They'll sit in your lap but you aren't allowed to touch them, they both cost a lot of money.
    Winston Churchill:

    I like pigs. Dogs look up to you. Cats look down on you. Pigs treat you as equals.
  • ByronicByronic Posts: 3,578
    > @kle4 said:

    >
    > How, exactly, is Brexit doable at this point for the Tories?
    >
    > WA - dead
    > Renegotiation - requiring the EU to fold despite holding firm this entire time
    > No deal - parliament will act to prevent
    > referendum - no Tory leader will be allowed to suggest it
    >
    > Only one of those options might get support from Tory MPs and see Brexit happen, and it is dependent on an external group doing exactly as they want. <

    +++++

    Yes, Brexit is difficult to do. But the legal default is No Deal. And we now have France AND Germany saying they will veto an extension in October (unless there is a GE/2nd vote)

    So Brexit will "do itself" in the end - Remainers are far too complacent in thinking they will easily be able to vote it down in the Commons. No Deal beckons. Brace.
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    viewcode said:

    kle4 said:

    nico67 said:

    Labour are losing four times as many Remainers than Leavers .

    Well, in that case the balance of remainers and leavers should be getting more even then, making them more representative of the county as a whole :)

    That's true. Labour might end up with 52 leavers and 48 Remainers as members

    Not percent. Just 100 members... :)

    [Puts on sunglasses, "The Who" on soundtrack...]
    Tommy?
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    > @viewcode said:

    > Cats are ace! But no, don't buy one, get a rescue cat :)

    >

    > I may regret starting this conversation, but...rescue cat?



    A cat being rehomed by a shelter or similar charity - rather than buying a pedigree kitten from a breeder.

    I was told a shocking statistic yesterday

    In the States shelters are theoretically “not for profit”.

    VCA - a division of Mars - receives donations of $120m per year for animal shelters. It’s one of their most profitable businesses.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    > @Casino_Royale said:
    > > @AlastairMeeks said:
    > > Old allegiances are breaking down. Some diehard party loyalists on both sides are among the last to notice precisely because they don’t feel the new dividing lines in the same way.
    >
    > But, that works both ways.
    >
    > The right leader of either the Conservatives or Labour could capture the mood.

    Perhaps. Neither look as though that is going to happen in practice.
  • ByronicByronic Posts: 3,578
    > @notme2 said:
    > > @oxfordsimon said:
    > > > @nunuone said:
    > > > How is she getting away with this grift?
    > > >
    > > > https://mobile.twitter.com/Rachael_Swindon/status/1134155409890189312
    > >
    > > And people will fall for it
    >
    >
    > Standard shakedown.<

    +++++

    The son of Harry from Harry's Last Stand is the same. It's gone from a noble cause to him simply asking for more money, just because his late dad was an old socialist. Horrible.
  • notme2notme2 Posts: 1,006
    > @kle4 said:
    > > @williamglenn said:
    >
    >
    >
    > >
    >
    > > The crucial thing that embeds this shift is that Tory Remainers are also going to the Lib Dems, and Labour Leavers are going to the Brexit Party, albeit in smaller numbers. That means that any shift of the major parties to try to counteract what's happening will just make it worse. They are both stuffed. <
    >
    >
    >
    > +++++
    >
    >
    >
    > There is a difference, however. The Tories have an exit route out of disaster, Labour do not, or at least not at the moment.
    >
    >
    >
    > The Tories have to deliver some kind of Brexit (yes that is hard, but it is do-able). if that happens they might expect to recover, at least partly. Labour, by contrast, are stuck with a leader who refuses to take a firm position, thus alienating all sides of the argument (AND he's a sinister old Trot). Labour are stuffed until they get rid of Jeremy, and there is no obvious way of ditching Jeremy.
    >
    > How, exactly, is Brexit doable at this point for the Tories?
    >
    > WA - dead
    > Renegotiation - requiring the EU to fold despite holding firm this entire time
    > No deal - parliament will act to prevent
    > referendum - no Tory leader will be allowed to suggest it
    >
    > Only one of those options might get support from Tory MPs and see Brexit happen, and it is dependent on an external group doing exactly as they want.

    the failure to get the WA through was as much about May’s inability to bring people into a coalition of support as it was the agreement itself. Labour leadership just put hurdles that couldn’t be reached, but enough back benchers itching to support it. A better politician would have got it through.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,131

    Betfair unmoved by Jesse Norman so far...

    I preferred him when he was an African-American woman singing opera at the Lincoln centre, but there y'go.

    [Seriously. Was I the only one who was struck by the names?]
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    notme2 said:

    > @kle4 said:

    > > @williamglenn said:

    >

    >

    >

    > >

    >

    > > The crucial thing that embeds this shift is that Tory Remainers are also going to the Lib Dems, and Labour Leavers are going to the Brexit Party, albeit in smaller numbers. That means that any shift of the major parties to try to counteract what's happening will just make it worse. They are both stuffed. <

    >

    >

    >

    > +++++

    >

    >

    >

    > There is a difference, however. The Tories have an exit route out of disaster, Labour do not, or at least not at the moment.

    >

    >

    >

    > The Tories have to deliver some kind of Brexit (yes that is hard, but it is do-able). if that happens they might expect to recover, at least partly. Labour, by contrast, are stuck with a leader who refuses to take a firm position, thus alienating all sides of the argument (AND he's a sinister old Trot). Labour are stuffed until they get rid of Jeremy, and there is no obvious way of ditching Jeremy.

    >

    > How, exactly, is Brexit doable at this point for the Tories?

    >

    > WA - dead

    > Renegotiation - requiring the EU to fold despite holding firm this entire time

    > No deal - parliament will act to prevent

    > referendum - no Tory leader will be allowed to suggest it

    >

    > Only one of those options might get support from Tory MPs and see Brexit happen, and it is dependent on an external group doing exactly as they want.



    the failure to get the WA through was as much about May’s inability to bring people into a coalition of support as it was the agreement itself. Labour leadership just put hurdles that couldn’t be reached, but enough back benchers itching to support it. A better politician would have got it through.

    For one that does not help us now though even if it is true, and for another I still don't buy that. Sure, a better politician might have sold it a lot better, but ultimately if there were a bunch of people who wanted to support it, but for May, then it is still on them that they did not back it. Plenty of MPs thought it not great, or even bad, and they ultimately decided that they had to back it because the alternatives were worse. If there are others who claim to think other options are worse but still did not back it that choice is entirely on them.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    Nigelb said:

    FPT, @Charles ...

    “I was in a meeting talking about developing vaccines for ASF. Sorry you weren’t my #1 priority...”



    No problem; I didn’t think for a moment I would be.

    My concern was that you were contributing what sounded a lot like FUD to the MMR debate, and I enquired about supporting data.



    I thought it might be a simple question for you.

    I replied on the previous thread
This discussion has been closed.