Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Betting opinion moves sharply against TMay’s chances of gettin

1911131415

Comments

  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    dixiedean said:

    AndyJS said:

    I can understand why a lot of Tory MPs are voting against the deal, but I can't understand why Labour MPs are doing so.

    Because they are the opposition?
    Traditionally speaking, you'd expect Labour to prefer a Deal just on a policy basis.
  • rpjsrpjs Posts: 3,787

    Never seen a photo of the lobbies before. I know its not a secret ballot anyway but that doesn't sit right with me.

    All Parliamentary division votes by MPs are a matter of public record.
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,293
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,732
    Sandpit said:

    Never seen a photo of the lobbies before. I know its not a secret ballot anyway but that doesn't sit right with me.

    Nope, they'll be in trouble with the Speaker for that photo.
    Several MPs published photos from the lobbies during the last meaningful vote.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    My conclusion is that not enough of the ERG (they’re bright sparks, that lot) will work out they need to vote for the Deal in the next few minutes to keep it alive.

    They’ll probably work it out in a few weeks time, by which time it’ll be history and life (and politics) will have moved on.

    May and the EU should have done better if they wanted this deal backing. This deal is pathetic and the fact its the only deal before us is not good enough.
    The deal is a very fair deal and fully worthy of backing.
    Didn't agree with you in January, don't agree with you now. Sorry but nothing has changed.

    This deal was told no - emphatically - in January. It should have been changed and nothing has changed. It needs to be told no again.
    You’re a unicorns or Remain “Brexiteer”.

    Forgive me if I don’t take your views too seriously.
    The backstop is a unicorn. It will never pass.

    The backstop is without parallel a huge and unprecedented violation in sovereignty - can you find me a simple example ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD of a sovereign nation having sacrificed its controls and customs to a foreign body in which it gets zero say and in which it can't unilaterally exit out of that arrangement to regain control?
    To be honest, Philip, I’m both bored and tired of responding to the hyperbole on this.

    There is plenty in the joint UK/EU political declaration to commit both parties to work for frictionless solutions in the permanent deal to overcome this, further reinforced by the qualifying riders and clarifying letters. It’s neither in the UK’s or EU’s interests for it to last.

    And NI is going to need to have some sort of special status wrt. the EU and UK in any Brexit scenario, and indeed, does so now. The whole place is a compromise.
    I have no qualms with a compromise. The backstop isn't a compromise it is abject surrender.
  • rkrkrkrkrkrk Posts: 8,298
    Your bet with SeanT really has been the most fantastic rollercoaster ride.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    Looks like the headbangers have decided that the wall needs extra impact for now.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,580

    Stephen Barclay cannot pronounce the letter “r”.

    Neither can I.

    It amuses me that the term for this condition is rhotacism. Hence a condition the afflicted cannot pronounce. ;)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhotacism_(speech_impediment)
    Apparently the fear of palindromes is aibohphobia which is itself a palindrome.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426

    Looks like the headbangers have decided that the wall needs extra impact for now.

    If Fabricant hit the walls of Dover Castle with his head, I'm willing to bet it would be the walls that would shatter.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,876
    Looks like a hammering.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,580

    My conclusion is that not enough of the ERG (they’re bright sparks, that lot) will work out they need to vote for the Deal in the next few minutes to keep it alive.

    They’ll probably work it out in a few weeks time, by which time it’ll be history and life (and politics) will have moved on.

    May and the EU should have done better if they wanted this deal backing. This deal is pathetic and the fact its the only deal before us is not good enough.
    The deal is a very fair deal and fully worthy of backing.
    Didn't agree with you in January, don't agree with you now. Sorry but nothing has changed.

    This deal was told no - emphatically - in January. It should have been changed and nothing has changed. It needs to be told no again.
    You’re a unicorns or Remain “Brexiteer”.

    Forgive me if I don’t take your views too seriously.
    The backstop is a unicorn. It will never pass.

    The backstop is without parallel a huge and unprecedented violation in sovereignty - can you find me a simple example ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD of a sovereign nation having sacrificed its controls and customs to a foreign body in which it gets zero say and in which it can't unilaterally exit out of that arrangement to regain control?
    To be honest, Philip, I’m both bored and tired of responding to the hyperbole on this.

    There is plenty in the joint UK/EU political declaration to commit both parties to work for frictionless solutions in the permanent deal to overcome this, further reinforced by the qualifying riders and clarifying letters. It’s neither in the UK’s or EU’s interests for it to last.

    And NI is going to need to have some sort of special status wrt. the EU and UK in any Brexit scenario, and indeed, does so now. The whole place is a compromise.
    I have no qualms with a compromise. The backstop isn't a compromise it is abject surrender.
    Sigh. No it really isn't. What will be surrender is ending up staying in the EU because the headbangers were unwilling to compromise on anything but the purists of Brexits.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 51,893
    It's a MEANINGLESS vote?
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,732
    Isabel Oakeshott is a surprisingly good real-time commentator when she's not pushing a political agenda.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    There's no point this being a close loss for the deal. This decision needs to either be a case of 'end this, we approve the deal' or 'end this farce, the deal is dead'.

    Looks like it will be a latter.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,580

    Never seen a photo of the lobbies before. I know its not a secret ballot anyway but that doesn't sit right with me.

    There was one at the big vote last month as well. That got the MP concerned suspended as it is strictly against House rules.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 54,631

    Stephen Barclay cannot pronounce the letter “r”.

    Neither can I.

    It amuses me that the term for this condition is rhotacism. Hence a condition the afflicted cannot pronounce. ;)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhotacism_(speech_impediment)
    Apparently the fear of palindromes is aibohphobia which is itself a palindrome.
    LOL.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 51,893
    Eurosceptic Retard Group?
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,876
    ydoethur said:

    Looks like the headbangers have decided that the wall needs extra impact for now.

    If Fabricant hit the walls of Dover Castle with his head, I'm willing to bet it would be the walls that would shatter.
    I think that should be thoroughly tested.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426

    Eurosceptic Retard Group?

    Unfair to retards, Doc, please withdraw.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 42,010

    Sandpit said:

    Never seen a photo of the lobbies before. I know its not a secret ballot anyway but that doesn't sit right with me.

    Nope, they'll be in trouble with the Speaker for that photo.
    Several MPs published photos from the lobbies during the last meaningful vote.
    Another one (Boris top left).

    https://twitter.com/PaulJSweeney/status/1105547206768107522
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 54,631
    20 minutes and counting for the division. Usually only 13 or 14.
  • dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,300
    edited March 2019
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426
    Sandpit said:

    20 minutes and counting for the division. Usually only 13 or 14.

    As near as bugger it three years and counting of division, actually.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    My conclusion is that not enough of the ERG (they’re bright sparks, that lot) will work out they need to vote for the Deal in the next few minutes to keep it alive.

    They’ll probably work it out in a few weeks time, by which time it’ll be history and life (and politics) will have moved on.

    May and the EU should have done better if they wanted this deal backing. This deal is pathetic and the fact its the only deal before us is not good enough.
    The deal is a very fair deal and fully worthy of backing.
    Didn't agree with you in January, don't agree with you now. Sorry but nothing has changed.

    This deal was told no - emphatically - in January. It should have been changed and nothing has changed. It needs to be told no again.
    You’re a unicorns or Remain “Brexiteer”.

    Forgive me if I don’t take your views too seriously.
    The backstop is a unicorn. It will never pass.

    The backstop is without parallel a huge and unprecedented violation in sovereignty - can you find me a simple example ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD of a sovereign nation having sacrificed its controls and customs to a foreign body in which it gets zero say and in which it can't unilaterally exit out of that arrangement to regain control?
    To be honest, Philip, I’m both bored and tired of responding to the hyperbole on this.

    There is plenty in the joint UK/EU political declaration to commit both parties to work for frictionless solutions in the permanent deal to overcome this, further reinforced by the qualifying riders and clarifying letters. It’s neither in the UK’s or EU’s interests for it to last.

    And NI is going to need to have some sort of special status wrt. the EU and UK in any Brexit scenario, and indeed, does so now. The whole place is a compromise.
    I have no qualms with a compromise. The backstop isn't a compromise it is abject surrender.
    Sigh. No it really isn't. What will be surrender is ending up staying in the EU because the headbangers were unwilling to compromise on anything but the purists of Brexits.
    The deal without a backstop still wouldn't have been the purist of the Brexits. There were a number of other objections to the deal such as committing to spending billions without any trade agreement sorted first. However Brexiteers were willing to compromise on all their other objections so long as just one objection was resolved. The EU refused to compromise on anything.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,676
    Nothing has changed
  • FloaterFloater Posts: 14,207
    ouch
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,414
    149
  • DruttDrutt Posts: 1,124
    edited March 2019
    149
  • ArtistArtist Posts: 1,893
    Sporting Index was nearly bang on.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 54,631
    242. Ker-ching!
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,293
    dr_spyn said:
    Everyone too busy taking pics and posting them to their Twitter to actually vote? :D
  • Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,821
    edited March 2019
    Well that was easy money. I guess we'll need it, though.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,197
    Ayes 242 Noes 391
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 54,631
    PM has lost her voice!
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,500
    149 majority against.
  • StreeterStreeter Posts: 684

    391 to 242

    Wonderful news.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,676
    Free vote. In office but not in power.
  • FloaterFloater Posts: 14,207
    oh hello
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,653
    Utter morons.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,876
    This is completely delusional.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,197
    So the gap narrows but the Deal fails, now the all out Remainer assault on Brexit itself will begin. First by ensuring Article 50 is extended, then by pushing Remain v Deal referendum or Norway Plus BINO, so the Deal is not dead yet
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 51,893
    ydoethur said:

    Eurosceptic Retard Group?

    Unfair to retards, Doc, please withdraw.
    Um, OK. How about Eurosceptic Reprobate Group?

  • StreeterStreeter Posts: 684
    HYUFD said:

    So the gap narrows but the Deal fails, now the all out Remainer assault on Brexit itself will begin. First by ensuring Article 50 is extended, then by pushing Remain v Deal referendum or Norway Plus BINO, so the Deal is not dead yet

    In other news...has Marine Le Pen lost yet?
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,992
    HYUFD said:

    So the gap narrows but the Deal fails, now the all out Remainer assault on Brexit itself will begin. First by ensuring Article 50 is extended, then by pushing Remain v Deal referendum or Norway Plus BINO, so the Deal is not dead yet

    Yes I think this is right. ERG not taking yes for an answer.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    DavidL said:

    This is completely delusional.

    Yes completely. Putting forth a rejected deal without changes was completely delusional.
  • May in full Headteacher mode now.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,197

    My conclusion is that not enough of the ERG (they’re bright sparks, that lot) will work out they need to vote for the Deal in the next few minutes to keep it alive.

    They’ll probably work it out in a few weeks time, by which time it’ll be history and life (and politics) will have moved on.

    May and the EU should have done better if they wanted this deal backing. This deal is pathetic and the fact its the only deal before us is not good enough.
    The deal is a very fair deal and fully worthy of backing.
    Didn't agree with you in January, don't agree with you now. Sorry but nothing has changed.

    This deal was told no - emphatically - in January. It should have been changed and nothing has changed. It needs to be told no again.
    You’re a unicorns or Remain “Brexiteer”.

    Forgive me if I don’t take your views too seriously.
    The backstop is a unicorn. It will never pass.

    The backstop is without parallel a huge and unprecedented violation in sovereignty - can trol?
    To be honest, Philip, I’m both bored and tired of responding to the hyperbole on this.

    There is plenty in the joint UK/EU political declaration to commit both parties to work for frictionless solutions in the permanent deal to overcome this, further reinforced by the qualifying riders and clarifying letters. It’s neither in the UK’s or EU’s interests for it to last.

    And NI is going to need to have some sort of special status wrt. the EU and UK in any Brexit scenario, and indeed, does so now. The whole place is a compromise.
    I have no qualms with a compromise. The backstop isn't a compromise it is abject surrender.
    Sigh. No it really isn't. What will be surrender is ending up staying in the EU because the headbangers were unwilling to compromise on anything but the purists of Brexits.
    The deal without a backstop still wouldn't have been the purist of the Brexits. There were a number of other objections to the deal such as committing to spending billions without any trade agreement sorted first. However Brexiteers were willing to compromise on all their other objections so long as just one objection was resolved. The EU refused to compromise on anything.
    Sorry but bricking up the English Channel would not have been enough for some in the ERG, if they tend up with the revocation of Article 50 and no Brexit at all it will be no more than they deserve
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,712
    Did May say which way she will vote tomorrow?

    I think she implied she will vote against leaving without a deal.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 51,893

    HYUFD said:
    As that's about 80 less than last time, does that count a a win in May's world?
    Theresa is Sally in the Hotels.com ad!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQ5e5uOgpK4
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,197
    edited March 2019
    MikeL said:

    Did May say which way she will vote tomorrow?

    I think she implied she will vote against leaving without a deal.

    I hope she does and savours every minute, tomorrow she gets her revenge on the ERG and on tonight's numbers the Commons will likely reject No Deal by more than it rejected her Deal
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 54,631
  • Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,821
    edited March 2019
    A free vote on the Tory side means 'no deal' is going to get rejected by some humongous margin. The key thing then will be the amendments on the extension, which I expect will include various possible durations, but the EU are now in control of the process.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 38,868

    Utter morons.

    A rare point of agreement SO.
  • No one wants a sodding GE, Jez, wind your neck in.
  • El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 4,239
    edited March 2019

    May in full Headteacher mode now.

    As the husband of a headteacher I demand you withdraw that slur.

    If May were a headteacher, her school would be in special measures and would be forcibly taken over by an academy chain. You know, a large organisation that groups together several individual institutions within one overarching management, on occasion criticised for being remote and unresponsive, but it does at least bail out the institutions and stop them going embarrassingly tits-up.

    Nope, the parallels escape me.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,732
    MikeL said:

    Did May say which way she will vote tomorrow?

    I think she implied she will vote against leaving without a deal.

    The no deal motion has been drafted in a way to make it look like parliament is voting to leave with a deal.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 42,010

    May in full Headteacher mode now.

    'This is going to hurt me more than it'll hurt you.'
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,676
    It is hard to underestimate how much May has screwed this up.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 51,893

    No one wants a sodding GE, Jez, wind your neck in.

    Evening, Brenda!
  • StreeterStreeter Posts: 684

    A free vote on the Tory side means 'no deal' is going to get rejected by some humongous margin. The key thing then will be the amendments on the extension, which I expect will include various possible durations, but the EU are now in control of the process.

    They always have been.
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,653
    I am genuinely stunned. The ERG are morons. Utter morons.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,876

    DavidL said:

    This is completely delusional.

    Yes completely. Putting forth a rejected deal without changes was completely delusional.
    I think we just have to give up and accept that we are not leaving. This displacement activity is tiresome.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    HYUFD said:

    Sigh. No it really isn't. What will be surrender is ending up staying in the EU because the headbangers were unwilling to compromise on anything but the purists of Brexits.

    The deal without a backstop still wouldn't have been the purist of the Brexits. There were a number of other objections to the deal such as committing to spending billions without any trade agreement sorted first. However Brexiteers were willing to compromise on all their other objections so long as just one objection was resolved. The EU refused to compromise on anything.
    Sorry but bricking up the English Channel would not have been enough for some in the ERG, if they tend up with the revocation of Article 50 and no Brexit at all it will be no more than they deserve
    Sorry but that's ludicrous hyperbole. There was a vote on backing the deal if the backstop was dealt with and there were only 8 Tory headbanger MPs who opposed that. They were:

    Heidi Allen, Guto Bebb, Ken Clarke, Dominic Grieve, Phillip Lee, Anne Marie Morris, Anna Soubry, Sarah Wollaston

    Absolutely all of those are extremists but the only extremist on that list from the ERG is I believe Anne Marie Morris.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936
    Meh!
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936

    I am genuinely stunned. The ERG are morons. Utter morons.

    At least some saw sense...
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,676

    I am genuinely stunned. The ERG are morons. Utter morons.

    Why stunned?
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426

    Sigh. No it really isn't. What will be surrender is ending up staying in the EU because the headbangers were unwilling to compromise on anything but the purists of Brexits.

    The deal without a backstop still wouldn't have been the purist of the Brexits. There were a number of other objections to the deal such as committing to spending billions without any trade agreement sorted first. However Brexiteers were willing to compromise on all their other objections so long as just one objection was resolved. The EU refused to compromise on anything.
    Okaaaay...
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,876

    I am genuinely stunned. The ERG are morons. Utter morons.

    This is news to you?
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    A free vote on the Tory side means 'no deal' is going to get rejected by some humongous margin. The key thing then will be the amendments on the extension, which I expect will include various possible durations, but the EU are now in control of the process.

    The EU have been in control of the process since May took over.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 38,868

    I am genuinely stunned. The ERG are morons. Utter morons.

    C**** is a much, much more satisfying word for them, SO. Trust me.
  • StreeterStreeter Posts: 684

    HYUFD said:

    Sigh. No it really isn't. What will be surrender is ending up staying in the EU because the headbangers were unwilling to compromise on anything but the purists of Brexits.

    The deal without a backstop still wouldn't have been the purist of the Brexits. There were a number of other objections to the deal such as committing to spending billions without any trade agreement sorted first. However Brexiteers were willing to compromise on all their other objections so long as just one objection was resolved. The EU refused to compromise on anything.
    Sorry but bricking up the English Channel would not have been enough for some in the ERG, if they tend up with the revocation of Article 50 and no Brexit at all it will be no more than they deserve
    Sorry but that's ludicrous hyperbole. There was a vote on backing the deal if the backstop was dealt with and there were only 8 Tory headbanger MPs who opposed that. They were:

    Heidi Allen, Guto Bebb, Ken Clarke, Dominic Grieve, Phillip Lee, Anne Marie Morris, Anna Soubry, Sarah Wollaston

    Absolutely all of those are extremists but the only extremist on that list from the ERG is I believe Anne Marie Morris.
    There is no deal without the backstop and so voting for it is utterly pointless. When will you realise that?
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,500

    A free vote on the Tory side means 'no deal' is going to get rejected by some humongous margin. The key thing then will be the amendments on the extension, which I expect will include various possible durations, but the EU are now in control of the process.

    So 'No Deal' gets voted down tomorrow. How long can May claim to have the confidence of the House?
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426
    Jonathan said:

    It is hard to underestimate how much May has screwed this up.

    Do you mean 'overstate' rather than 'underestimate?'
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,176

    HYUFD said:
    The man who told us the EU would fold has folded.

    I am genuinely stunned. The ERG are morons. Utter morons.

    These two posts pretty much sum up PB remainers.
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,712

    MikeL said:

    Did May say which way she will vote tomorrow?

    I think she implied she will vote against leaving without a deal.

    The no deal motion has been drafted in a way to make it look like parliament is voting to leave with a deal.
    Indeed - and presumably TMay is voting Aye as she is tabling the motion.
  • FloaterFloater Posts: 14,207
    DavidL said:

    DavidL said:

    This is completely delusional.

    Yes completely. Putting forth a rejected deal without changes was completely delusional.
    I think we just have to give up and accept that we are not leaving. This displacement activity is tiresome.
    What do you think that does to the tory party?

  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 51,893
    HYUFD said:

    My conclusion is that not enough of the ERG (they’re bright sparks, that lot) will work out they need to vote for the Deal in the next few minutes to keep it alive.

    They’ll probably work it out in a few weeks time, by which time it’ll be history and life (and politics) will have moved on.

    May and the EU should have done better if they wanted this deal backing. This deal is pathetic and the fact its the only deal before us is not good enough.
    The deal is a very fair deal and fully worthy of backing.
    Didn't agree with you in January, don't agree with you now. Sorry but nothing has changed.

    This deal was told no - emphatically - in January. It should have been changed and nothing has changed. It needs to be told no again.
    You’re a unicorns or Remain “Brexiteer”.

    Forgive me if I don’t take your views too seriously.
    The backstop is a unicorn. It will never pass.

    The backstop is without parallel a huge and unprecedented violation in sovereignty - can trol?
    To be honest, Philip, I’m both bored and tired of responding to the hyperbole on this.

    There is plenty in the joint UK/EU political declaration to commit both parties to work for frictionless solutions in the permanent deal to overcome this, further reinforced by the qualifying riders and clarifying letters. It’s neither in the UK’s or EU’s interests for it to last.

    And NI is going to need to have some sort of special status wrt. the EU and UK in any Brexit scenario, and indeed, does so now. The whole place is a compromise.
    ]
    Sigh. No it really isn't. What will be surrender is ending up staying in the EU because the headbangers were unwilling to compromise on anything but the purists of Brexits.
    The deal without a backstop still wouldn't have been the purist of the Brexits. There were a number of other objections to the deal such as committing to spending billions without any trade agreement sorted first. However Brexiteers were willing to compromise on all their other objections so long as just one objection was resolved. The EU refused to compromise on anything.
    Sorry but bricking up the English Channel would not have been enough for some in the ERG, if they tend up with the revocation of Article 50 and no Brexit at all it will be no more than they deserve
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MNZALcCzSg

  • I am genuinely stunned. The ERG are morons. Utter morons.

    Confirmed for all to see.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,676
    ydoethur said:

    Jonathan said:

    It is hard to underestimate how much May has screwed this up.

    Do you mean 'overstate' rather than 'underestimate?'
    Misunderestimate.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,876
    Yvette has a brass neck.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    ydoethur said:

    Sigh. No it really isn't. What will be surrender is ending up staying in the EU because the headbangers were unwilling to compromise on anything but the purists of Brexits.

    The deal without a backstop still wouldn't have been the purist of the Brexits. There were a number of other objections to the deal such as committing to spending billions without any trade agreement sorted first. However Brexiteers were willing to compromise on all their other objections so long as just one objection was resolved. The EU refused to compromise on anything.
    Okaaaay...
    Check the Brady amendment vote.

    Rebels had many objections to the Deal but every Tory except 7 Remainers and Anne Marie Morris voted that they were prepared to compromise on all those objections so long as there was a solution to the backstop.

    What have the EU compromised on since January?
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,653
    DavidL said:

    I am genuinely stunned. The ERG are morons. Utter morons.

    This is news to you?

    I guess not. But I genuinely did not believe they’d do this. I thought that somewhere in them was a sense of duty, of realism, of patriotism. My bad, I accept that.

  • TheWhiteRabbitTheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,454
    now all we need is for the LDs/TIG to vote against an extension, on the basis it still doesn't get them a PV
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936
    Floater said:

    DavidL said:

    DavidL said:

    This is completely delusional.

    Yes completely. Putting forth a rejected deal without changes was completely delusional.
    I think we just have to give up and accept that we are not leaving. This displacement activity is tiresome.
    What do you think that does to the tory party?

    Depends, if it happens because the government falls probably not much.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426

    ydoethur said:

    Sigh. No it really isn't. What will be surrender is ending up staying in the EU because the headbangers were unwilling to compromise on anything but the purists of Brexits.

    The deal without a backstop still wouldn't have been the purist of the Brexits. There were a number of other objections to the deal such as committing to spending billions without any trade agreement sorted first. However Brexiteers were willing to compromise on all their other objections so long as just one objection was resolved. The EU refused to compromise on anything.
    Okaaaay...
    Check the Brady amendment vote.

    Rebels had many objections to the Deal but every Tory except 7 Remainers and Anne Marie Morris voted that they were prepared to compromise on all those objections so long as there was a solution to the backstop.

    What have the EU compromised on since January?
    It was your comments on Richard I was bemused by!
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,876
    Floater said:

    DavidL said:

    DavidL said:

    This is completely delusional.

    Yes completely. Putting forth a rejected deal without changes was completely delusional.
    I think we just have to give up and accept that we are not leaving. This displacement activity is tiresome.
    What do you think that does to the tory party?

    Who cares? They are finished and completely unfit to govern.
  • StreeterStreeter Posts: 684

    ydoethur said:

    Sigh. No it really isn't. What will be surrender is ending up staying in the EU because the headbangers were unwilling to compromise on anything but the purists of Brexits.

    The deal without a backstop still wouldn't have been the purist of the Brexits. There were a number of other objections to the deal such as committing to spending billions without any trade agreement sorted first. However Brexiteers were willing to compromise on all their other objections so long as just one objection was resolved. The EU refused to compromise on anything.
    Okaaaay...
    Check the Brady amendment vote.

    Rebels had many objections to the Deal but every Tory except 7 Remainers and Anne Marie Morris voted that they were prepared to compromise on all those objections so long as there was a solution to the backstop.

    What have the EU compromised on since January?
    Nothing. Why should they?
  • Brexit is over as remainers takeover
  • Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,821
    Interesting line from the PM:

    Voting for an extension does not solve the problems the government faces. The EU will want to know if the UK wants to revoke article 50 or if it wants a referendum. Those are choices the house must now face.

    Is that a hint that the government will offer the House those two options? She's right on the substantive point, of course.
  • tottenhamWCtottenhamWC Posts: 352
    Jezza is a disgrace. Useless is too kind
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,653
    May mentioned a referendum just now. Corbyn did not.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    Streeter said:

    ydoethur said:

    Sigh. No it really isn't. What will be surrender is ending up staying in the EU because the headbangers were unwilling to compromise on anything but the purists of Brexits.

    The deal without a backstop still wouldn't have been the purist of the Brexits. There were a number of other objections to the deal such as committing to spending billions without any trade agreement sorted first. However Brexiteers were willing to compromise on all their other objections so long as just one objection was resolved. The EU refused to compromise on anything.
    Okaaaay...
    Check the Brady amendment vote.

    Rebels had many objections to the Deal but every Tory except 7 Remainers and Anne Marie Morris voted that they were prepared to compromise on all those objections so long as there was a solution to the backstop.

    What have the EU compromised on since January?
    Nothing. Why should they?
    If they wanted a deal they could compromise.
  • FloaterFloater Posts: 14,207
    DavidL said:

    Floater said:

    DavidL said:

    DavidL said:

    This is completely delusional.

    Yes completely. Putting forth a rejected deal without changes was completely delusional.
    I think we just have to give up and accept that we are not leaving. This displacement activity is tiresome.
    What do you think that does to the tory party?

    Who cares? They are finished and completely unfit to govern.
    They are unfit - and then I look at Labour

    We are so fucked - well done Cameron
  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    So how many Cabinet ministers on each side of the no deal vote?
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426
    DavidL said:

    Floater said:

    DavidL said:

    DavidL said:

    This is completely delusional.

    Yes completely. Putting forth a rejected deal without changes was completely delusional.
    I think we just have to give up and accept that we are not leaving. This displacement activity is tiresome.
    What do you think that does to the tory party?

    Who cares? They are finished and completely unfit to govern.
    The priceless irony of Corbyn's election in 2015 was that it came about because Labour members were convinced they couldn't win and so fancied ideological purity for a bit.

    If they had compromised and gone for centrism, they'd be back in power by now. As it is we have a useless government and a useless and vile opposition.
This discussion has been closed.