politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » NEW PB/Polling Matters podcast: Election eve special
On a special eve of election podcast Keiran is joined by Politicalbetting.com Editor Mike Smithson and Deputy Habib Butt (TSE) to review the campaign, polls, seats to watch tomorrow night and to make some predictions.
Can I just say, I don't know why the Tories on here are worried. Their worst poll in the whole campaign has had them on 40%. ICM have them comfortably ahead. It's just a question of how badly distributed Labour's votes are and therefore how big the Tory majority is.
David Herdson has confirmed to me that he did post that comment at 8.43pm
This should be the header - I never thought he had been hacked, but I guess I wasn't paying attention, as I didn't think he was so glum on Tory prospects as to predict 300 Tory seats.
Can I just say, I don't know why the Tories on here are worried. Their worst poll in the whole campaign has had them on 40%. ICM have them comfortably ahead. It's just a question of how badly distributed Labour's votes are and therefore how big the Tory majority is.
I think there was one with them on 39.
It's the crapness of the campaign, and Labour recovery, combined with the fear that this time things really could be different, and trying not to get overexcited by believing the most positive polls, that things really could be that good for them.
Across the region, 34% of people said they are planning to vote Labour later this week, compared to 25% who said that was their planned vote at the start of the election campaign. The proportion of respondents backing the Tories is at 26%, compared to 32% backing the party at the start of the campaign.
David Herdson still should state the basis of why he thinks the Tories will get only 300+ seats. It's not really helpful to put that out there and then leave people in the lurch.
Still, exact same difference between the parties as last time, what a waste of time and effort. And LDs up but still likely to lose seats as others up even more.
Everyone always said YouGov knew what they are doing.
I'm not a whisky drinker but I have two miniatures in the pantry: a 10 year old Laphroaig and a 18 year old Glenfiddich. Which one for the exit poll tomorrow?
Yes, I noticed that too, and I think some of the other polls have shown a nudge up. It's reasonable to assume that it's concentrated in their defence/target seats, which may mean some striking variations.
Overall, though, a lead of 7-8 seems plausible, with a little bit of swingback to the Tories in these final days as people peruse the Mail and Sun...
It's interesting that two final polls have big movements LD->Lab and Lab->LD. Is it just a sign of tactical voting that is showing up in opposite directions in the samples?
David Herdson has confirmed to me that he did post that comment at 8.43pm
Is he OK? Really didn't sound like him.
No, he's pissed off. In fact, he's fuming.
He might be wrong as well but the response on the doorstep this evening was not healthy (from a Con viewpoint). Maybe I was just unlucky with who I spoke to (or who spoke to me) but it's a week since I've done serious canvassing as I've been delivering for most of the interim and the mood was definitely changed.
Sorry for posting that and then buggering off. Dinner and baby duties.
I'm not a whisky drinker but I have two miniatures in the pantry: a 10 year old Laphroaig and a 18 year old Glenfiddich. Which one for the exit poll tomorrow?
Glenfiddy is smooth but boring. Laphroaig kicks you in the nuts but leaves you wanting more.
David Herdson has confirmed to me that he did post that comment at 8.43pm
This should be the header - I never thought he had been hacked, but I guess I wasn't paying attention, as I didn't think he was so glum on Tory prospects as to predict 300 Tory seats.
If "the Cons are on 300" and "Corbyns going to do this", "the polls are right" would be wrong
paging david herdson, paging david herdson we need elaboration
He might have had a really bad last minute leafleting session with some waverers in Wakefield, that didn't go as expected, and the canvass returns/late data has shrunk on the winning margin.
I'm not a whisky drinker but I have two miniatures in the pantry: a 10 year old Laphroaig and a 18 year old Glenfiddich. Which one for the exit poll tomorrow?
The first, no contest. You'll be equipped for a wider range of projections.
2. Do we know that the David Herdson who confirmed the David Herdson post, was David Herdson? Just that if someone can post as him, it's more likely because they have a device of his already logged in than that they know his password, and if they have a device it's probably also logged on to email.
3. If it is really him, any chance of expanding on the post?
I'm not a whisky drinker but I have two miniatures in the pantry: a 10 year old Laphroaig and a 18 year old Glenfiddich. Which one for the exit poll tomorrow?
I'm not a whisky drinker but I have two miniatures in the pantry: a 10 year old Laphroaig and a 18 year old Glenfiddich. Which one for the exit poll tomorrow?
David Herdson still should state the basis of why he thinks the Tories will get only 300+ seats. It's not really helpful to put that out there and then leave people in the lurch.
I'm rather concerned about his state of mind - stress and overwork I expect.
Lets consider his comment - Con at 300 but still gain Wakefield.
If the Conservatives gain Wakefield they're likely to gain at least 20 seats so to fall to 300 they would need to lose at least 50 which they presently hold.
Now does anyone think that likely ?
And what's brought on this change of mind - some leafleting in Wakefield or Hemsworth ?
2. Do we know that the David Herdson who confirmed the David Herdson post, was David Herdson? Just that if someone can post as him, it's more likely because they have a device of his already logged in than that they know his password, and if they have a device it's probably also logged on to email.
3. If it is really him, any chance of expanding on the post?
+1. It does not seem to be in character to just make a statement and then go off and not expand on it. That's the part that makes me think something is amiss here.
Twenty-twenty-twenty four hours to go, I wanna be sedated..... Nothing to do, no where to go oh, I wanna be sedated
Just get me to the airport, put me on a plane Hurry hurry hurry, before I go insane I can't control my fingers, I can't control my brain Oh no oh no oh no.....
2. Do we know that the David Herdson who confirmed the David Herdson post, was David Herdson? Just that if someone can post as him, it's more likely because they have a device of his already logged in than that they know his password, and if they have a device it's probably also logged on to email.
3. If it is really him, any chance of expanding on the post?
David Herdson's post at 8.43pm did seem rather uncharacteristic in its abruptness and the absence of elegant writing. The conclusion seemed rather surprising too. Given that this is a betting site and David is one of the site's renowned posters I think it would have been helpful had he elaborated.
I am a fan of David's contributions but that one appeared very odd.
David Herdson has confirmed to me that he did post that comment at 8.43pm
Is he OK? Really didn't sound like him.
No, he's pissed off. In fact, he's fuming.
He might be wrong as well but the response on the doorstep this evening was not healthy (from a Con viewpoint). Maybe I was just unlucky with who I spoke to (or who spoke to me) but it's a week since I've done serious canvassing as I've been delivering for most of the interim and the mood was definitely changed.
Sorry for posting that and then buggering off. Dinner and baby duties.
David Herdson has confirmed to me that he did post that comment at 8.43pm
This should be the header - I never thought he had been hacked, but I guess I wasn't paying attention, as I didn't think he was so glum on Tory prospects as to predict 300 Tory seats.
I might have over-reacted. Still, I'm very dubious about 325+ and wouldn't be buying at that level. I'm also exhausted after seven weeks trying to oversee two constituency campaigns, do a full-time job and look after a nine-month old baby 24/7 (or about 20/7 anyway).
Having said all that, I still think that May's blown it.
YouGov's mega model also suggests the reemergence of tactical voting as the campaign closes....no change in Tory/Labour VI, but projecting more Labour and more LibDem seats and fewer Tory...
Comments
Ok 3rd like the Lib Dems
Edit: oh there it is.
It's the crapness of the campaign, and Labour recovery, combined with the fear that this time things really could be different, and trying not to get overexcited by believing the most positive polls, that things really could be that good for them.
Is he tied up somewhere guarded by big chaps with Russian accents?
ICM 12 CON lead
ComRes 10
Panelbase 8
Opinium 7
YouGov 7
TMS 5
Kantar 5
David Herdson has bedwetted. I am worried.
I need answers.
Wanders off to check facebook post......
Ok - it leads to this
http://www.gazette-news.co.uk/news/15331840.REVEALED__Survey_shows_Labour_may_have_won_enough_support_to_overtake_Conservatives_in_our_region/
Across the region, 34% of people said they are planning to vote Labour later this week, compared to 25% who said that was their planned vote at the start of the election campaign. The proportion of respondents backing the Tories is at 26%, compared to 32% backing the party at the start of the campaign.
I call bollocks
Looks like we have late herding after all.
Con - Lab gap same as 2015. LD goes up 2 points. Con seats increase !!!
Still, exact same difference between the parties as last time, what a waste of time and effort. And LDs up but still likely to lose seats as others up even more.
Everyone always said YouGov knew what they are doing.
To stretch the Alien versus Predator analogy: that'd be Alien versus Frank Spencer.
I thought the other Kaboom had been discredited .. ?
Hello Diane
NorthEast
Cons 44
Lab 41
LD 9
Swing 12.5% Labour to Cons
NorthWest
Cons 42
Lab 45
LD 6
Swing 5.5% Labour to Cons
Yorkshire and Humber
Cons 46
Lab 41
LD 7
Swing 5.5% Labour to Cons
West Midlands
Cons 46
Lab 34
LD 10
Swing 1.5% Labour to Cons
East Midlands
Cons 51
Lab 35
LD 3
Swing 2% Labour to Cons
Wales
Cons 40
Lab 38
LD 5
Swing 6% Labour to Cons
East
Cons 51
Lab 30
LD 12
Swing 3% Cons to Labour
London
Cons 42
Lab 41
LD 11
Swing 4.5% Labour to Cons
South East
Cons 47
Lab 29
LD 13
Swing 7.5% Cons to Labour
South West
Cons 49
Lab 29
LD 12
Swing 4.5% Cons to Labour
Scotland
Cons 27
Lab 16
SNP 45
LD 9
Swing 8.5% SNP to Tory
http://www.comresglobal.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Independent_FINAL-VI-and-Political-Poll_7th-June-2017_130392.pdf
Still missing Panelbase - Con +8.
Either -
a) full of shit for the past 10 days
b) decided to herd
c) they have picked up on a massive late swing against Corbyn
d) a combo of the above.
So it's The Herdson Vs JohnO and Mr Jack?
#easyjoke
How do changes compared with past YouGov poll for Sunday Times?
Overall, though, a lead of 7-8 seems plausible, with a little bit of swingback to the Tories in these final days as people peruse the Mail and Sun...
He might be wrong as well but the response on the doorstep this evening was not healthy (from a Con viewpoint). Maybe I was just unlucky with who I spoke to (or who spoke to me) but it's a week since I've done serious canvassing as I've been delivering for most of the interim and the mood was definitely changed.
Sorry for posting that and then buggering off. Dinner and baby duties.
I'm expecting Lab to get second in many seats round here.
I see David has explained.
2. Do we know that the David Herdson who confirmed the David Herdson post, was David Herdson? Just that if someone can post as him, it's more likely because they have a device of his already logged in than that they know his password, and if they have a device it's probably also logged on to email.
3. If it is really him, any chance of expanding on the post?
Con 43.58
Lab 33.44
LD 7.52
UKIP 4.58
Tory lead 10.14
Lets consider his comment - Con at 300 but still gain Wakefield.
If the Conservatives gain Wakefield they're likely to gain at least 20 seats so to fall to 300 they would need to lose at least 50 which they presently hold.
Now does anyone think that likely ?
And what's brought on this change of mind - some leafleting in Wakefield or Hemsworth ?
You might as well ask Derek Acorah's Ethiopian spirit guide
Twenty-twenty-twenty four hours to go,
I wanna be sedated.....
Nothing to do, no where to go oh,
I wanna be sedated
Just get me to the airport, put me on a plane
Hurry hurry hurry, before I go insane
I can't control my fingers, I can't control my brain
Oh no oh no oh no.....
46% is the post spiral of silence adjustment
Look at table 5, not table 4
I am a fan of David's contributions but that one appeared very odd.
So we wait another 24 hours for the exit poll
Having said all that, I still think that May's blown it.