politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Theresa’s Tories drop to their lowest level yet on the Commons seats spread markets
There’s been a big shake-up in the betting following the publication by the Times of YouGov’s new election model that suggests that Team Theresa could be net losers of seats a week tomorrow and not have a majority.
I like the idea of what YouGov have tried to do. I'm yet to be convinced by the execution of it.
Me too.
This (yougov model) has great potential.
Having a massive polling panel with detailed demographic / socioeconomic info on your panel - then figuring out which voters are changing their minds (and where they live) is the future of FPTP election polling.
By 2027, they'll be predicting the result to within a dozen or so seats.
The data will be used by campaigns to increasingly focus their campaign effort on smaller and smaller numbers of crucial swing voters they've personally identified.
I like the idea of what YouGov have tried to do. I'm yet to be convinced by the execution of it.
Me too.
This (yougov model) has great potential.
Having a massive polling panel with detailed demographic / socioeconomic info on your panel - then figuring out which voters are changing their minds (and where they live) is the future of FPTP election polling.
By 2027, they'll be predicting the result to within a dozen or so seats...
I like the idea of what YouGov have tried to do. I'm yet to be convinced by the execution of it.
Me too.
This (yougov model) has great potential.
Having a massive polling panel with detailed demographic / socioeconomic info on your panel - then figuring out which voters are changing their minds (and where they live) is the future of FPTP election polling.
By 2027, they'll be predicting the result to within a dozen or so seats.
The data will be used by campaigns to increasingly focus their campaign effort on smaller and smaller numbers of crucial swing voters they've personally identified.
The political parties are in principle capable of doing this themselves, far better than YouGov could. The LibDems for example had a socioeconomic classification (I think it came from Experian) which first divided everyone in 63 groups. Then you could combine that with age, sex and previous voting intentions, then add in the latest canvass data (which would be a million contacts even for the Libdems) calculate your transfer probabilities and off you go.
I like the idea of what YouGov have tried to do. I'm yet to be convinced by the execution of it.
Me too.
This (yougov model) has great potential.
Having a massive polling panel with detailed demographic / socioeconomic info on your panel - then figuring out which voters are changing their minds (and where they live) is the future of FPTP election polling.
By 2027, they'll be predicting the result to within a dozen or so seats.
The data will be used by campaigns to increasingly focus their campaign effort on smaller and smaller numbers of crucial swing voters they've personally identified.
Was it Asimov who wrote a short story about how the polling had become so accurate, they just selected the winner, no need to vote.
I like the idea of what YouGov have tried to do. I'm yet to be convinced by the execution of it.
Me too.
This has great potential.
Having a massive polling panel with detailed demographic / socioeconomic info on your panel - then figuring out which voters are changing their minds (and where they live) is the future of FPTP election polling.
By 2027, they'll be predicting the result to within a dozen or so seats.
The data will be used by campaigns to increasingly focus their campaign effort on smaller and smaller numbers of crucial swing voters they've personally identified.
It will crash and burn this time but should be able to be massively refined for next
two issues here.
1) UNS is too simplistic to make a prediction so someone has to come up with a better mechanism. personally I think that working out which groups are switching between parties is better but could be proven wrong.
2) the model is all well and good but if you can't get a representative sample (and some of the pollsters are definately getting it wrong but don't ask me who) then even a perfect model falls foul of the SISO rule.
If Amber performs poorly tonight, no way can she replace Phil Hammond as Chancellor.
If May doesn't pull off a landslide she won't be able to anyway. He's the one figure currently able to command significant support from all wings of the party and therefore her only credible rival for the leadership.
On a different note, I wonder if these polls could be counterproductive for Labour? Suppose they still end up with around 150 seats - the shock will be much greater because they thought they had by their own exertions converted large chunks of the electorate to their cause. Remember, Miliband's performance wasn't actually that bad and in several key ways was better than Brown's - but because Labour were anticipating a return to power he was forced out and we got Corbyn as a sort of mass PTSD episode.
Could the same happen again? Could they ditch Corbyn for Macdonnell, who is after all holder of one of their safest seats?
In which case, welcome Leader of the Opposition Farron in 2022.
I like the idea of what YouGov have tried to do. I'm yet to be convinced by the execution of it.
Me too.
This (yougov model) has great potential.
Having a massive polling panel with detailed demographic / socioeconomic info on your panel - then figuring out which voters are changing their minds (and where they live) is the future of FPTP election polling.
By 2027, they'll be predicting the result to within a dozen or so seats.
The data will be used by campaigns to increasingly focus their campaign effort on smaller and smaller numbers of crucial swing voters they've personally identified.
Was it Asimov who wrote a short story about how the polling had become so accurate, they just selected the winner, no need to vote.
Perhaps they are using the term "cruising" in its gay culture sense, i.e. wandering around drunk looking to be royally buggered.
She does look ill doesn't she? I think unlike in 2015 there is a whiff of fear about the Tories now, the odd dissenting quote from candidates on the campaign trail etc. Perhaps their internal polling is showing the same trend as the polls we are seeing.
I like the idea of what YouGov have tried to do. I'm yet to be convinced by the execution of it.
Me too.
This (yougov model) has great potential.
Having a massive polling panel with detailed demographic / socioeconomic info on your panel - then figuring out which voters are changing their minds (and where they live) is the future of FPTP election polling.
By 2027, they'll be predicting the result to within a dozen or so seats.
The data will be used by campaigns to increasingly focus their campaign effort on smaller and smaller numbers of crucial swing voters they've personally identified.
Was it Asimov who wrote a short story about how the polling had become so accurate, they just selected the winner, no need to vote.
May is receiving such bad advice. She should be at the debate to take back a positive narrative. As it is we are a week away from Corbyn as PM and she is unwilling to stand up for her convictions.
I like the idea of what YouGov have tried to do. I'm yet to be convinced by the execution of it.
Me too.
This (yougov model) has great potential.
Having a massive polling panel with detailed demographic / socioeconomic info on your panel - then figuring out which voters are changing their minds (and where they live) is the future of FPTP election polling.
By 2027, they'll be predicting the result to within a dozen or so seats.
The data will be used by campaigns to increasingly focus their campaign effort on smaller and smaller numbers of crucial swing voters they've personally identified.
Was it Asimov who wrote a short story about how the polling had become so accurate, they just selected the winner, no need to vote.
I think they found the one voter who always represented the population and that voter was the only one to vote.
Compare electionforecast with YouGov for Richmond Park, Twickenham, and Kingston.
electionforecast has Tory probability of winning at 100%, 93% and 98% respectively.
YouGov has Tossup, likely LibDem and leans LibDem respectively which is line with the bookies.
I wouldn't say that electionforecast is MILES more realistic than YouGov.
Looking at several dozen random examples in YouGov I think their estimated (wide) spreads cover the likely outcome very well unlike election forecast which is too black and white (and often plain wrong).
I think Twickenham is (sadly) quite a likely LibDem gain:
1. They have every council seat in the constituency, and won them at the height of coalition unpopularity 2. Heathrow is a much bigger issue in Twickenham than in Richmond 3. It is in the heart of Remainia 4. Tania Mathias has struggled to make an impact as the MP 5. The Labour vote is more than twice the UKIP one 6. The Green vote in 2015 was significantly more than the Conservative majority 7. Twickenham is more... how to put this... David Cameron country, than Theresa May country
I'd reckon Twickenham is the only odds on gain for the LibDems (from the Conservatives) in the country.
(fpt - typical i write two long posts and a new thread gets opened during their writing)
The question that's been running through my head over the last couple of days is
'where has the increased labour vote actually come from?'
This is especially puzzling as we know from the locals that UKIP have crumbled towards the tories. if you look at the previous GE where has the 38% come from (the peak labour vote share)
previous GE (c38 l31 u13 ld8 s5 g4) yougov on the 24/25th (c43 l38 u4 ld10 s5 g1)
the most obvious switch is the ukip=>con, for this I'm going to give all 9% to the Tories but that gives the tories 47% which is somewhere near where they were at the beginning of the campaign.
when it comes to the labour vote I can't work it out if they have really be squeezing the left side of the tories and the greens that much? is it realistic to expect that 75% of green voters are going to vote Labour? have the SNP really gone nowhere?
if you take the ICM on 26-29th of (c45 l33 u5 ld8 s4 g3) it's reasonable to expect that the tories have lost 1-2 % to labour during the campaign, that the LDs have remained static, the SNP have lost 1% jointly to labour and the tories and that the greens are being squeezed by 1% by labour.
I know that there is going to be some polling error in all of this and that the narrative is all labour strength and tory weakness but I'm beginning to doubt most of the large labour surge is real.
If Amber performs poorly tonight, no way can she replace Phil Hammond as Chancellor.
Surely with Jezza about to become Prime Minster he will appoint Diane Abbott as Chancellor in a reshuffle ?
Presumably, if Jeremy actually becomes PM (can't believe i am typing this) he will suddenly find that all those talented/experienced Labour MPs on the backbenches, Yvette Cooper et al, will be willing to work in his Cabinet?
So maybe there is a chance we would be spared Ms Abbott as Home Sec, or her tenure would be very short.
It's Jezza for moi ....
Nothing to do with the Labour Shoe Tax .... honest guv ....
Perhaps they are using the term "cruising" in its gay culture sense, i.e. wandering around drunk looking to be royally buggered.
She does look ill doesn't she? I think unlike in 2015 there is a whiff of fear about the Tories now, the odd dissenting quote from candidates on the campaign trail etc. Perhaps their internal polling is showing the same trend as the polls we are seeing.
Did you see BBC 6 News? She looked scared, and ill.
Re the thinking about Brexit and mockery thereof. It's a well planned response to the question because it is what the 52% want to hear. She is now on a 100% Brexit, competence, security, economy drive. Everything else is irrelevant to her, she is just focused on getting the Brexiteers and Tory base out and riding the purple cushion.
May is receiving such bad advice. She should be at the debate to take back a positive narrative. As it is we are a week away from Corbyn as PM and she is unwilling to stand up for her convictions.
Nah, she's being advised by Nick Timothy, the brains and Titan behind the dementia tax.
May is receiving such bad advice. She should be at the debate to take back a positive narrative. As it is we are a week away from Corbyn as PM and she is unwilling to stand up for her convictions.
It'd be spun as another U-turn, and that she was bounced into it in a panic.
Survey monkey for the Sun 44 38 6 closing in from 8 lead to 6
FFS. Ever closer. We're looking at a Hung Parliament, or a very modest Tory maj.
AGAINST JEREMY BLOODY CORBYN
Gives her a majority of around 40 seats, what's wrong with that? should last the full 5 years and if she retires after 2020 the new leader, perhaps Boris, would gain a popularity boost going into 2020. I expect this is the high tide mark for Labour, when people go to the polling stations they will think 'Corbyn? .....no I just can't do it'
Perhaps they are using the term "cruising" in its gay culture sense, i.e. wandering around drunk looking to be royally buggered.
She does look ill doesn't she? I think unlike in 2015 there is a whiff of fear about the Tories now, the odd dissenting quote from candidates on the campaign trail etc. Perhaps their internal polling is showing the same trend as the polls we are seeing.
The Jim Messina tweet today would point to the opposite.
I think May is just shocked she's going to have to put some effort in and isn't a very good campaigner.
Survey monkey for the Sun 44 38 6 closing in from 8 lead to 6
FFS. Ever closer. We're looking at a Hung Parliament, or a very modest Tory maj.
AGAINST JEREMY BLOODY CORBYN
Gives her a majority of around 40 seats, what's wrong with that? should last the full 5 years and if she retires after 2020 the new leader, perhaps Boris, would gain a popularity boost going into 2020. I expect this is the high tide mark for Labour, when people go to the polling stations they will think 'Corbyn? .....no I just can't do it'
May is receiving such bad advice. She should be at the debate to take back a positive narrative. As it is we are a week away from Corbyn as PM and she is unwilling to stand up for her convictions.
Nah, she's being advised by Nick Timothy, the brains and Titan behind the dementia tax.
Vox pop from Delyn/Wrexham on ITV Wales very much pro Theresa May by the workers and bosses to get UK out of Europe.
If that is typical of North Wales labour could lose Delyn and Wrexham
So different from opinion on here. Really good for TM
Vox Pops are not representative of peoples views . They are people selected to give the views of what the program producers want to present . The producers do not tell you if they had to interview 5 people to get those views or 50 or 500 .
May is receiving such bad advice. She should be at the debate to take back a positive narrative. As it is we are a week away from Corbyn as PM and she is unwilling to stand up for her convictions.
It'd be spun as another U-turn, and that she was bounced into it in a panic.
Besides it's now too late for people to be swapping en masse, she's all about GOTV now
Survey monkey poll was 19,000 participants over the last week.
And how many members does Momentum have?
Seriously - we've just had a bank holiday, it's half term - trying to do polls at the moment is just a waste of time and money (although perhaps less of a waste of time than worrying about them - or shouting at them!)
Compare electionforecast with YouGov for Richmond Park, Twickenham, and Kingston.
electionforecast has Tory probability of winning at 100%, 93% and 98% respectively.
YouGov has Tossup, likely LibDem and leans LibDem respectively which is line with the bookies.
I wouldn't say that electionforecast is MILES more realistic than YouGov.
Looking at several dozen random examples in YouGov I think their estimated (wide) spreads cover the likely outcome very well unlike election forecast which is too black and white (and often plain wrong).
I think Twickenham is (sadly) quite a likely LibDem gain:
1. They have every council seat in the constituency, and won them at the height of coalition unpopularity 2. Heathrow is a much bigger issue in Twickenham than in Richmond 3. It is in the heart of Remainia 4. Tania Mathias has struggled to make an impact as the MP 5. The Labour vote is more than twice the UKIP one 6. The Green vote in 2015 was significantly more than the Conservative majority 7. Twickenham is more... how to put this... David Cameron country, than Theresa May country
I'd reckon Twickenham is the only odds on gain for the LibDems (from the Conservatives) in the country.
Betfair's (rather thin) market seems to agree with you.
Survey monkey poll was 19,000 participants over the last week.
And how many members does Momentum have?
Seriously - we've just had a bank holiday, it's half term - trying to do polls at the moment is just a waste of time and money (although perhaps less of a waste of time than worrying about them - or shouting at them!)
Perhaps they are using the term "cruising" in its gay culture sense, i.e. wandering around drunk looking to be royally buggered.
She does look ill doesn't she? I think unlike in 2015 there is a whiff of fear about the Tories now, the odd dissenting quote from candidates on the campaign trail etc. Perhaps their internal polling is showing the same trend as the polls we are seeing.
Did you see BBC 6 News? She looked scared, and ill.
May looked ghastlier than usual. Which isn't easy.
When did they stop reporting polls without 3% MOE? I say that because a 6% poll lead could indicate a tie.
For me so long the Tories poll above 40% they are very safe. If you start seeing leading 3s only then does it get vaguely interesting.
It's interesting how in this election MOE movements are considered 'news' - it's like MOE has been forgotten about. Before, any movement under 3 points had caveats about reading too much into it.
Part of the reason why we started paying attention to Labour's surge was because the first poll that showed it, showed Labour increasing their VI by 5% - above MOE.
When did they stop reporting polls without 3% MOE? I say that because a 6% poll lead could indicate a tie.
For me so long the Tories poll above 40% they are very safe. If you start seeing leading 3s only then does it get vaguely interesting.
The YouGov poll was so huge that the margin of error owing to random sampling effects would be only a fraction of a percentage point. But that doesn't eliminate the margin of error owing to not knowing how accurate the model is.
When did they stop reporting polls without 3% MOE? I say that because a 6% poll lead could indicate a tie.
For me so long the Tories poll above 40% they are very safe. If you start seeing leading 3s only then does it get vaguely interesting.
The YouGov poll was so huge that the margin of error owing to random sampling effects would be only a fraction of a percentage point. But that doesn't eliminate the margin of error owing to not knowing how accurate the model is.
that's not true. if the sample is unrepresentative then the MOE would be greater
Gives her a majority of around 40 seats, what's wrong with that? should last the full 5 years and if she retires after 2020 the new leader, perhaps Boris, would gain a popularity boost going into 2020
Anyone betting on Boris to be PM is on a greater hiding to nothing than Diane Abbott's maths tutor.
Just ask yourself one simple question - can he ever make the final two?
And the answer is clearly 'no.' That is why Gove deserted him and stood himself and that is why Boris ultimately withdrew.
The only way he can do it is if the rules change so the members vote on the candidates directly. This has been experimented with by one party but the results may politely be called unfortunate.
Anyway, broadband is buggering me about so I am off for a swim. May be back Friday.
Survey monkey for the Sun 44 38 6 closing in from 8 lead to 6
FFS. Ever closer. We're looking at a Hung Parliament, or a very modest Tory maj.
AGAINST JEREMY BLOODY CORBYN
Calm down.
Did you see the "thinking about Brexit" clip?
Nope.
I can't actually watch Theresa May any more. It's too painful. It is, as you said, Gordon Brown all over again, right down to the eerie smiles.
In a way this is worse. Brown went down to expected defeat against a clever opponent. TMay is close to throwing away a huge landslide victory against the worst Opposition leader since Ceolwulf the Prolapsed got literally zero votes in 549AD.
Sean, I'm one of Theresa May's most trenchant critics.
Yes, she's crap, but she's up against Corbyn, ignore the VI and the Tories/May are on course for victory.
She might have blown a 25% lead, but it is likely to be a 10-15% lead for the Blues which indicates a three figure majority.
The Tories don't fanny about, if she continues to be crap, she'll be deposed before she knows it.
The Tories toppled Thatcher when she had a 100 seat majority
Worth remembering from a betting perspective that the news is not and indeed cannot report on campaigns being a disaster short of saying it and allowing the accused to say no not at all, they are not permitted to analyse what went wrong before the act. It's the microcosm of sites like this that you find the self fulfilling prophecy meme. Most people out there might see one report saying x or y had a bad day in the campaign trail. Lord of the Flies style frenzy is easy to fall into inside the bubble Every time someone sees their one bad day for may report they think yeah but she was very pm like over Manchester etc etc. Most minds were made up 6 weeks ago.
I like the idea of what YouGov have tried to do. I'm yet to be convinced by the execution of it.
Me too.
This has great potential.
Having a massive polling panel with detailed demographic / socioeconomic info on your panel - then figuring out which voters are changing their minds (and where they live) is the future of FPTP election polling.
By 2027, they'll be predicting the result to within a dozen or so seats.
The data will be used by campaigns to increasingly focus their campaign effort on smaller and smaller numbers of crucial swing voters they've personally identified.
It will crash and burn this time but should be able to be massively refined for next
two issues here.
1) UNS is too simplistic to make a prediction so someone has to come up with a better mechanism. personally I think that working out which groups are switching between parties is better but could be proven wrong.
2) the model is all well and good but if you can't get a representative sample (and some of the pollsters are definately getting it wrong but don't ask me who) then even a perfect model falls foul of the SISO rule.
Sounds better in the original all Latin Purgamentum init, exit purgamentum
When did they stop reporting polls without 3% MOE? I say that because a 6% poll lead could indicate a tie.
For me so long the Tories poll above 40% they are very safe. If you start seeing leading 3s only then does it get vaguely interesting.
It's interesting how in this election MOE movements are considered 'news' - it's like MOE has been forgotten about. Before, any movement under 3 points had caveats about reading too much into it.
Part of the reason why we started paying attention to Labour's surge was because the first poll that showed it, showed Labour increasing their VI by 5% - above MOE.
OTOH in 2010 "just MOE" was a very unreliable comfort blanket for the tories, because even though the drops in the lead were MOE they were all to the downside.
Survey monkey for the Sun 44 38 6 closing in from 8 lead to 6
FFS. Ever closer. We're looking at a Hung Parliament, or a very modest Tory maj.
AGAINST JEREMY BLOODY CORBYN
Calm down.
Did you see the "thinking about Brexit" clip?
Nope.
I can't actually watch Theresa May any more. It's too painful. It is, as you said, Gordon Brown all over again, right down to the eerie smiles.
In a way this is worse. Brown went down to expected defeat against a clever opponent. TMay is close to throwing away a huge landslide victory against the worst Opposition leader since Ceolwulf the Prolapsed got literally zero votes in 549AD.
Sean, I'm one of Theresa May's most trenchant critics.
Yes, she's crap, but she's up against Corbyn, ignore the VI and the Tories/May are on course for victory.
She might have blown a 25% lead, but it is likely to be a 10-15% lead for the Blues which indicates a three figure majority.
The Tories don't fanny about, if she continues to be crap, she'll be deposed before she knows it.
The Tories toppled Thatcher when she had a 100 seat majority
I see May as a stop gap leader, she wont stand in 2022 (if she wins).
I like the idea of what YouGov have tried to do. I'm yet to be convinced by the execution of it.
Me too.
This (yougov model) has great potential.
Having a massive polling panel with detailed demographic / socioeconomic info on your panel - then figuring out which voters are changing their minds (and where they live) is the future of FPTP election polling.
By 2027, they'll be predicting the result to within a dozen or so seats.
The data will be used by campaigns to increasingly focus their campaign effort on smaller and smaller numbers of crucial swing voters they've personally identified.
Was it Asimov who wrote a short story about how the polling had become so accurate, they just selected the winner, no need to vote.
I think they found the one voter who always represented the population and that voter was the only one to vote.
Wasn't that also the plot of the 1980s sit-com "The Happy Apple" where Leslie Ash played the secretary of an advertising agency? She was "Miss Average" and so they just asked her for ideas instead of doing proper market research.
I'm selling Lib/Dem seats, surely they won't get more than 12, if they stay on 9 I'll get 3.5 times stake.
I think they'll get less than 12, but the risk/reward is terribly asymmetric. You have effectively sold a call option on LibDem seats for only a small premium.
Survey monkey for the Sun 44 38 6 closing in from 8 lead to 6
FFS. Ever closer. We're looking at a Hung Parliament, or a very modest Tory maj.
AGAINST JEREMY BLOODY CORBYN
Calm down.
Did you see the "thinking about Brexit" clip?
Nope.
I can't actually watch Theresa May any more. It's too painful. It is, as you said, Gordon Brown all over again, right down to the eerie smiles.
In a way this is worse. Brown went down to expected defeat against a clever opponent. TMay is close to throwing away a huge landslide victory against the worst Opposition leader since Ceolwulf the Prolapsed got literally zero votes in 549AD.
Except Corbyn is clearly not that bad an opposition leader, he is having a far better campaign than Michael Foot, William Hague and Ed Miliband had for example (and almost certainly better than IDS would have had) and is better able to motivate his base than they all did, yet despite all that May still is polling 42% or over in every poll principally because of UKIP voters moving to the Tories
Survey monkey for the Sun 44 38 6 closing in from 8 lead to 6
FFS. Ever closer. We're looking at a Hung Parliament, or a very modest Tory maj.
AGAINST JEREMY BLOODY CORBYN
Calm down.
NO
jeremy corbyn will not get 38% of the voting public next thursday. ain't gonna happen . as usual labour is been overstated and with differential turnout and the young not being arsed to vote TM as PM with an increased majority and mandate for brexit is a dead cert. we pb tories are being emotional yoyos
When did they stop reporting polls without 3% MOE? I say that because a 6% poll lead could indicate a tie.
For me so long the Tories poll above 40% they are very safe. If you start seeing leading 3s only then does it get vaguely interesting.
The YouGov poll was so huge that the margin of error owing to random sampling effects would be only a fraction of a percentage point. But that doesn't eliminate the margin of error owing to not knowing how accurate the model is.
that's not true. if the sample is unrepresentative then the MOE would be greater
I'm including that under inaccuracies of the model. I agree that if there's a persistent, systematic bias in the sampling it would affect the result. But the statistical variation between repeated samples would still be tiny.
I like the idea of what YouGov have tried to do. I'm yet to be convinced by the execution of it.
Me too.
This (yougov model) has great potential.
Having a massive polling panel with detailed demographic / socioeconomic info on your panel - then figuring out which voters are changing their minds (and where they live) is the future of FPTP election polling.
By 2027, they'll be predicting the result to within a dozen or so seats.
The data will be used by campaigns to increasingly focus their campaign effort on smaller and smaller numbers of crucial swing voters they've personally identified.
Was it Asimov who wrote a short story about how the polling had become so accurate, they just selected the winner, no need to vote.
Just checked, yes, it was called Franchise.
I thought it was slightlyt different. That a single voter was chosen by a computer as being the perfect representative of the population as a whole and he would basically make all the decisions presented to him over his 4 year term.
Survey monkey for the Sun 44 38 6 closing in from 8 lead to 6
FFS. Ever closer. We're looking at a Hung Parliament, or a very modest Tory maj.
AGAINST JEREMY BLOODY CORBYN
Calm down.
Did you see the "thinking about Brexit" clip?
Nope.
I can't actually watch Theresa May any more. It's too painful. It is, as you said, Gordon Brown all over again, right down to the eerie smiles.
In a way this is worse. Brown went down to expected defeat against a clever opponent. TMay is close to throwing away a huge landslide victory against the worst Opposition leader since Ceolwulf the Prolapsed got literally zero votes in 549AD.
Sean, I'm one of Theresa May's most trenchant critics.
Yes, she's crap, but she's up against Corbyn, ignore the VI and the Tories/May are on course for victory.
She might have blown a 25% lead, but it is likely to be a 10-15% lead for the Blues which indicates a three figure majority.
The Tories don't fanny about, if she continues to be crap, she'll be deposed before she knows it.
The Tories toppled Thatcher when she had a 100 seat majority
Ordinarily I'd agree with you, but in this case there's Brexit to consider. I can't see the Tories getting rid of her (assuming victory next week) before Brexit is done and dusted.... unless polling shows Brexit is suddenly very unpopular (and I mean 65%+ unpopular) and then we might see a 'let's not Brexit' PM appear. Personally I think that's very unlikely (in a YouGov probability way!).
Perhaps they are using the term "cruising" in its gay culture sense, i.e. wandering around drunk looking to be royally buggered.
She does look ill doesn't she? I think unlike in 2015 there is a whiff of fear about the Tories now, the odd dissenting quote from candidates on the campaign trail etc. Perhaps their internal polling is showing the same trend as the polls we are seeing.
Did you see BBC 6 News? She looked scared, and ill.
She looked like she'd missed one of her insulin jabs, or neglected to eat immediately after one.
I think we are somewhat guilty of thinking the parties are campaigning for our votes as politically aware and active. They aren't, they are farming the kipper and Brexiteers, the disenfranchised etc. Different methods for them, different soundbites. You voted for Brexit, I'm busy planning for Brexit. Simples. Witness her applause on Paxman once she got onto it. That's what they want, that's what she is delivering. It's unappealing to politicos but politicos won't give her a landslide. Think Brexiteer Kipper and review.
When did they stop reporting polls without 3% MOE? I say that because a 6% poll lead could indicate a tie.
For me so long the Tories poll above 40% they are very safe. If you start seeing leading 3s only then does it get vaguely interesting.
The YouGov poll was so huge that the margin of error owing to random sampling effects would be only a fraction of a percentage point. But that doesn't eliminate the margin of error owing to not knowing how accurate the model is.
that's not true. if the sample is unrepresentative then the MOE would be greater
I'm including that under inaccuracies of the model. I agree that if there's a persistent, systematic bias in the sampling it would affect the result. But the statistical variation between repeated samples would still be tiny.
but if there's, say, a shy tory effect it'll make no difference how many people you sample if you don't get it right (or at all)
Survey monkey for the Sun 44 38 6 closing in from 8 lead to 6
FFS. Ever closer. We're looking at a Hung Parliament, or a very modest Tory maj.
AGAINST JEREMY BLOODY CORBYN
The argument from his Labour opponents was he was supposed to be a vote loser. I for one believed it. If you accepted that premise their actions were justified. In the light of the evidence much less so. Not sure what I'd do if I were one of them. It's a funny old world.
I think Twickenham is (sadly) quite a likely LibDem gain:
1. They have every council seat in the constituency, and won them at the height of coalition unpopularity 2. Heathrow is a much bigger issue in Twickenham than in Richmond 3. It is in the heart of Remainia 4. Tania Mathias has struggled to make an impact as the MP 5. The Labour vote is more than twice the UKIP one 6. The Green vote in 2015 was significantly more than the Conservative majority 7. Twickenham is more... how to put this... David Cameron country, than Theresa May country
I'd reckon Twickenham is the only odds on gain for the LibDems (from the Conservatives) in the country.
Lib Dem signs are all over Twickenham. I don't know if they will win but they certainly seem to be making a big effort.
When did they stop reporting polls without 3% MOE? I say that because a 6% poll lead could indicate a tie.
For me so long the Tories poll above 40% they are very safe. If you start seeing leading 3s only then does it get vaguely interesting.
It's interesting how in this election MOE movements are considered 'news' - it's like MOE has been forgotten about. Before, any movement under 3 points had caveats about reading too much into it.
Part of the reason why we started paying attention to Labour's surge was because the first poll that showed it, showed Labour increasing their VI by 5% - above MOE.
OTOH in 2010 "just MOE" was a very unreliable comfort blanket for the tories, because even though the drops in the lead were MOE they were all to the downside.
I think the lead has declined for sure, I just don't think anyone should get worked up over movements within 1-2 points.
In 2010 the Conservatives were already 'in trouble' by January/February, some months out from the GE.
Survey monkey for the Sun 44 38 6 closing in from 8 lead to 6
FFS. Ever closer. We're looking at a Hung Parliament, or a very modest Tory maj.
AGAINST JEREMY BLOODY CORBYN
The argument from his Labour opponents was he was supposed to be a vote loser. I for one believed it. If you accepted that premise their actions were justified. In the light of the evidence much less so. Not sure what I'd do if I were one of them. It's a funny old world.
Survey monkey for the Sun 44 38 6 closing in from 8 lead to 6
FFS. Ever closer. We're looking at a Hung Parliament, or a very modest Tory maj.
AGAINST JEREMY BLOODY CORBYN
Calm down.
Did you see the "thinking about Brexit" clip?
Nope.
I can't actually watch Theresa May any more. It's too painful. It is, as you said, Gordon Brown all over again, right down to the eerie smiles.
In a way this is worse. Brown went down to expected defeat against a clever opponent. TMay is close to throwing away a huge landslide victory against the worst Opposition leader since Ceolwulf the Prolapsed got literally zero votes in 549AD.
Except Corbyn is clearly not that bad an opposition leader, he is having a far better campaign than Michael Foot, William Hague and Ed Miliband had for example (and almost certainly better than IDS would have had) and is better able to motivate his base than they all did, yet despite all that May still is polling 42% or over in every poll principally because of UKIP voters moving to the Tories
Have you seen the newspapers each day? They talk about Corbyn and terrorists, Nuclear unilateralism, unaffordable spending, mass immigration etc etc. I don't think that equates to a good campaign.
Kantar TNS numbers now out and they have the Tories leading with 25-34 year olds, 45-54 year olds, 55-64 year olds and the over 65s. Labour leads with 18-24s and 35-44s.
10% of 2015 Labour voters are now voting Tory and 6% of 2015 Tory voters are now voting Labour. 27% of 2015 LDs are voting Tory and 22% Labour. 46% of 2015 UKIP voters are voting Tory and 15% Labour
Comments
She's worked in high finance, for such esteemed institutions like J.P. Morgan.
If that is typical of North Wales labour could lose Delyn and Wrexham
So different from opinion on here. Really good for TM
Solid
Oh, the YouGov tracker... yeah.
Which personality type do you want as your leader. This article suggests that Corbyn has a split personality?
1) UNS is too simplistic to make a prediction so someone has to come up with a better mechanism. personally I think that working out which groups are switching between parties is better but could be proven wrong.
2) the model is all well and good but if you can't get a representative sample (and some of the pollsters are definately getting it wrong but don't ask me who) then even a perfect model falls foul of the SISO rule.
On a different note, I wonder if these polls could be counterproductive for Labour? Suppose they still end up with around 150 seats - the shock will be much greater because they thought they had by their own exertions converted large chunks of the electorate to their cause. Remember, Miliband's performance wasn't actually that bad and in several key ways was better than Brown's - but because Labour were anticipating a return to power he was forced out and we got Corbyn as a sort of mass PTSD episode.
Could the same happen again? Could they ditch Corbyn for Macdonnell, who is after all holder of one of their safest seats?
In which case, welcome Leader of the Opposition Farron in 2022.
1. They have every council seat in the constituency, and won them at the height of coalition unpopularity
2. Heathrow is a much bigger issue in Twickenham than in Richmond
3. It is in the heart of Remainia
4. Tania Mathias has struggled to make an impact as the MP
5. The Labour vote is more than twice the UKIP one
6. The Green vote in 2015 was significantly more than the Conservative majority
7. Twickenham is more... how to put this... David Cameron country, than Theresa May country
I'd reckon Twickenham is the only odds on gain for the LibDems (from the Conservatives) in the country.
The question that's been running through my head over the last couple of days is
'where has the increased labour vote actually come from?'
This is especially puzzling as we know from the locals that UKIP have crumbled towards the tories. if you look at the previous GE where has the 38% come from (the peak labour vote share)
previous GE (c38 l31 u13 ld8 s5 g4)
yougov on the 24/25th (c43 l38 u4 ld10 s5 g1)
the most obvious switch is the ukip=>con, for this I'm going to give all 9% to the Tories but that gives the tories 47% which is somewhere near where they were at the beginning of the campaign.
when it comes to the labour vote I can't work it out if they have really be squeezing the left side of the tories and the greens that much? is it realistic to expect that 75% of green voters are going to vote Labour? have the SNP really gone nowhere?
if you take the ICM on 26-29th of (c45 l33 u5 ld8 s4 g3) it's reasonable to expect that the tories have lost 1-2 % to labour during the campaign, that the LDs have remained static, the SNP have lost 1% jointly to labour and the tories and that the greens are being squeezed by 1% by labour.
I know that there is going to be some polling error in all of this and that the narrative is all labour strength and tory weakness but I'm beginning to doubt most of the large labour surge is real.
An 'interesting' financial career.
Nothing to do with the Labour Shoe Tax .... honest guv ....
It's a well planned response to the question because it is what the 52% want to hear. She is now on a 100% Brexit, competence, security, economy drive. Everything else is irrelevant to her, she is just focused on getting the Brexiteers and Tory base out and riding the purple cushion.
Nick Timothy putting the tit in Titan.
I expect this is the high tide mark for Labour, when people go to the polling stations they will think 'Corbyn? .....no I just can't do it'
I think May is just shocked she's going to have to put some effort in and isn't a very good campaigner.
For me so long the Tories poll above 40% they are very safe. If you start seeing leading 3s only then does it get vaguely interesting.
Seriously - we've just had a bank holiday, it's half term - trying to do polls at the moment is just a waste of time and money (although perhaps less of a waste of time than worrying about them - or shouting at them!)
Part of the reason why we started paying attention to Labour's surge was because the first poll that showed it, showed Labour increasing their VI by 5% - above MOE.
Just ask yourself one simple question - can he ever make the final two?
And the answer is clearly 'no.' That is why Gove deserted him and stood himself and that is why Boris ultimately withdrew.
The only way he can do it is if the rules change so the members vote on the candidates directly. This has been experimented with by one party but the results may politely be called unfortunate.
Anyway, broadband is buggering me about so I am off for a swim. May be back Friday.
Yes, she's crap, but she's up against Corbyn, ignore the VI and the Tories/May are on course for victory.
She might have blown a 25% lead, but it is likely to be a 10-15% lead for the Blues which indicates a three figure majority.
The Tories don't fanny about, if she continues to be crap, she'll be deposed before she knows it.
The Tories toppled Thatcher when she had a 100 seat majority
WillS
Lord of the Flies style frenzy is easy to fall into inside the bubble
Every time someone sees their one bad day for may report they think yeah but she was very pm like over Manchester etc etc.
Most minds were made up 6 weeks ago.
Purgamentum init, exit purgamentum
One thing is looking clear - the next PM ill be a Tory; May wont lead them into 2022 (or whenever).
https://twitter.com/BBCNews/status/869908350019829760
WillS
Different methods for them, different soundbites.
You voted for Brexit, I'm busy planning for Brexit. Simples.
Witness her applause on Paxman once she got onto it. That's what they want, that's what she is delivering. It's unappealing to politicos but politicos won't give her a landslide. Think Brexiteer Kipper and review.
In 2010 the Conservatives were already 'in trouble' by January/February, some months out from the GE.
I think we've been used to suave performers like Cameron and Blair.
But that's very poor from Mrs May.
Like a pound shop Gordon Brown
Reminded me of this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTE6cTBrGcA
10% of 2015 Labour voters are now voting Tory and 6% of 2015 Tory voters are now voting Labour. 27% of 2015 LDs are voting Tory and 22% Labour. 46% of 2015 UKIP voters are voting Tory and 15% Labour
http://www.tns-bmrb.co.uk/sites/tns-bmrb/files/KPUK - final tables - 31.5.2017.pdf
View it through that prism.