Do we know who is behind this / model they are using?
It is using real data, as the projections for each state changes as the votes come in. They have FL as a slam dunk for Trump now, which must be based on what their model expects from the missing votes.
In the EC he is still over 100 from victory on 167
Clinton will win the national vote comfortably because West Coast.
On present trends her lead in California will be down on Obama's lead in 2012, she needs a really big lead there to be sure of overtaking Trump in the national popular vote
Jacks ARSE looking like it just stayed over at a Michael Barrymore pool party.
Jack's ARSE is no good for anti-establishment candidates facing off against the establishment. He was out by 5 points on Sindy, 5 points on Brexit and looks to be out by a similar amount in the US.
Jacks ARSE looking like it just stayed over at a Michael Barrymore pool party.
Jack's ARSE is no good for anti-establishment candidates facing off against the establishment. He was out by 5 points on Sindy, 5 points on Brexit and looks to be out by a similar amount in the US.
We don't have a ground game any more. The new members advise me that door knocking is so old and that all we need is social media and The Canary to convert non-voters to nailed on Labour votes
In the EC he is still over 100 from victory on 167
Clinton will win the national vote comfortably because West Coast.
On present trends her lead in California will be down on Obama's lead in 2012, she needs a really big lead there to be sure of overtaking Trump in the national popular vote
The Ohio result is massive. It puts the rust belt in play. Michigan Minnesota and Wisconsin all in play as a result. Key parts of the fire wall, well, on fire.
BBC flashed "Trump wins Virginia" I just screamed at the TV. 5 seconds later "Clinton winsVirginia" Even the BBC are in on it tonight. I think I've had as much as I can handle for one night.
The Ohio result is massive. It puts the rust belt in play. Michigan Minnesota and Wisconsin all in play as a result. Key parts of the fire wall, well, on fire.
The Ohio result is massive. It puts the rust belt in play. Michigan Minnesota and Wisconsin all in play as a result. Key parts of the fire wall, well, on fire.
The Ohio result is massive. It puts the rust belt in play. Michigan Minnesota and Wisconsin all in play as a result. Key parts of the fire wall, well, on fire.
Could he win WI, MI, OH and PA?
Don't think Pa but he doesn't need it if he gets the others.
In the EC he is still over 100 from victory on 167
Clinton will win the national vote comfortably because West Coast.
On present trends her lead in California will be down on Obama's lead in 2012, she needs a really big lead there to be sure of overtaking Trump in the national popular vote
50 quid?
I presently stand to win a little over that if the winner of the popular vote loses the EC, so no am not going to risk that thankyou. As I said my bet wins either way (though may come back to you once the California returns are in). However if Trump falls just short in Michigan or Pennsylvania but cuts Clinton's lead in California it is certainly possible he wins the popular vote but not the EC
I was wondering about Condi Rice as president-after-next... if you need your candidate to "make up for" your last one, she's the one you're going to call. (Not usually the way it works, admittedly.)
BBC flashed "Trump wins Virginia" I just screamed at the TV. 5 seconds later "Clinton winsVirginia" Even the BBC are in on it tonight. I think I've had as much as I can handle for one night.
Remember that all of us and everything we see is just part of some computer simulation. Or so some scientists believe.
I disregarded all the 'evidence' and 'experts' and backed trump at 9/2 earlier in the week. Put £100 on. Toyed with putting on another £200 at 4/1 last night, but didn't go ahead.
Seeing a lot of tweets saying this is not over. And I was thinking of going to bed and planning my nuclear shelter.
It's not completely over, but Clinton winning is now basically the equivalent of having a blindfold on, and trying to hit the bullseye on a darts board 4 times in a row. Theoretically possible, but unlikely.
Comments
He's winning it by 9%.
Muppets
Mine are.
Even the BBC are in on it tonight. I think I've had as much as I can handle for one night.
Took Wisconsin for granted.
http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/president
So that makes
Trump 168
Clinton 122
She ran a Guardianista/ Poly Toynbee type campaign. IN AMERICA.
http://www.nytimes.com/elections/forecast/president
If he wins Ohio/Michigan/PA surely he gets the popular vote as well?
292 Trump, 246 Clinton is their central forecast.
(I worked briefly there in 2011)
https://twitter.com/jantalipinski/status/796081263878832128
Laurence just now
https://twitter.com/jantalipinski/status/796195433433407488
http://edition.cnn.com/election/results/president
PA, MI, WI
He has several paths to victory now, Clinton only has one.
Clinton 52%
Trump 40%
http://edition.cnn.com/election/results/states/minnesota#president
David Frum
We may be living through the most successful Russian intelligence operation since the Rosenbergs stole the A-bomb.
Hillary is getting votes from Wayne County but Trump has more votes coming from Macomb and Kent.