On Saturday at a University American football match a chap went dressed up as Barack Obama wearing a noose.
That picture is appalling.
Can he be charged with incitement?
That would depend on local laws. And, given that US Courts have upheld the right of God Hates Fags to demonstrate at funerals, he might not be in violation of the law.
Reading that article TSE makes me glad that I chose economics over law at Uni.... FFS..you have to have a very strange kind of brain to be a lawyer....
To be a lawyer, you don't just need a strange brain, most important is the lack of heart and morals.
Very good, and very quick TSE....
FWIW I love your little "ooh erghhh Madame" pun/innuendos in your articles....keep them coming
When people say it would be funny if Trump won, just look at that photo. It would be a disaster. It would unleash carnage.
Carnage from whom? The Democrats most likely based on the fact that the left rioted after the 2010 election with no pretext to do so and constantly arranged demonstrations that usually turned violent.
It's funny but the right in countries don't seem to demonstrate violently - the last major ';right-wing' demonstration - the Countryside Alliance - even left people behind to tidy up.
Similarly when the EDL or whoever hold a march it always seems to be the left (UAF or the equivalent) who get arrested for violence.
In Amercia I can point you to a Republican office being torched and a frail homeless woman being beaten up for preventing Trump's 'star' from being damaged again.
When people say it would be funny if Trump won, just look at that photo. It would be a disaster. It would unleash carnage.
Carnage from whom? The Democrats most likely based on the fact that the left rioted after the 2010 election with no pretext to do so and constantly arranged demonstrations that usually turned violent.
It's funny but the right in countries don't seem to demonstrate violently - the last major ';right-wing' demonstration - the Countryside Alliance - even left people behind to tidy up.
Similarly when the EDL or whoever hold a march it always seems to be the left (UAF or the equivalent) who get arrested for violence.
In Amercia I can point you to a Republican office being torched and a frail homeless woman being beaten up for preventing Trump's 'star' from being damaged again.
You might want to check out the far right and violence in the US, as well as the violence of groups around organisations like Black Lives Matter. Race is incendiary in the US to a degree almost unimaginable here. A racist in the White House would embolden and enrage and would lead to mayhem.
When people say it would be funny if Trump won, just look at that photo. It would be a disaster. It would unleash carnage.
Carnage from whom? The Democrats most likely based on the fact that the left rioted after the 2010 election with no pretext to do so and constantly arranged demonstrations that usually turned violent.
It's funny but the right in countries don't seem to demonstrate violently - the last major ';right-wing' demonstration - the Countryside Alliance - even left people behind to tidy up.
Similarly when the EDL or whoever hold a march it always seems to be the left (UAF or the equivalent) who get arrested for violence.
In Amercia I can point you to a Republican office being torched and a frail homeless woman being beaten up for preventing Trump's 'star' from being damaged again.
Christ you're a thick as pigshit.
I once accidentally attended an EDL march in 2009, trust me, the violence was all one way.
Have a look at yourself you Trump ramper, defending the EDL, you should be ashamed of yourself.
On Saturday at a University American football match a chap went dressed up as Barack Obama wearing a noose.
That picture is appalling.
Can he be charged with incitement?
That would depend on local laws. And, given that US Courts have upheld the right of God Hates Fags to demonstrate at funerals, he might not be in violation of the law.
made it a federal crime to “by force or by threat of force, injure, intimidate, or interfere with anyone … by reason of their race, color, religion, or national origin.”
I believe this has been used against cross burning etc...
On Saturday at a University American football match a chap went dressed up as Barack Obama wearing a noose.
That picture is appalling.
Can he be charged with incitement?
That would depend on local laws. And, given that US Courts have upheld the right of God Hates Fags to demonstrate at funerals, he might not be in violation of the law.
made it a federal crime to “by force or by threat of force, injure, intimidate, or interfere with anyone … by reason of their race, color, religion, or national origin.”
I believe this has been used against cross burning etc...
Surely Trump has been repeatedly breaching this law in his campaign speeches?
Decades ago, the department decided that in the 60-day period before an election, the balance should be struck against even returning indictments involving individuals running for office, as well as against the disclosure of any investigative steps. The reasoning was that, however important it might be for Justice to do its job, and however important it might be for the public to know what Justice knows, because such allegations could not be adjudicated, such actions or disclosures risked undermining the political process. A memorandum reflecting this choice has been issued every four years by multiple attorneys general for a very long time, including in 2016...
When people say it would be funny if Trump won, just look at that photo. It would be a disaster. It would unleash carnage.
Carnage from whom? The Democrats most likely based on the fact that the left rioted after the 2010 election with no pretext to do so and constantly arranged demonstrations that usually turned violent.
It's funny but the right in countries don't seem to demonstrate violently - the last major ';right-wing' demonstration - the Countryside Alliance - even left people behind to tidy up.
Similarly when the EDL or whoever hold a march it always seems to be the left (UAF or the equivalent) who get arrested for violence.
In Amercia I can point you to a Republican office being torched and a frail homeless woman being beaten up for preventing Trump's 'star' from being damaged again.
Christ you're a thick as pigshit.
I once accidentally attended an EDL march in 2009, trust me, the violence was all one way.
Have a look at yourself you Trump ramper, defending the EDL, you should be ashamed of yourself.
You accidentally attended an EDL rally? Is that a bit like accidentally ending up watching hardcore pornography on the internet?
On Saturday at a University American football match a chap went dressed up as Barack Obama wearing a noose.
That picture is appalling.
Can he be charged with incitement?
That would depend on local laws. And, given that US Courts have upheld the right of God Hates Fags to demonstrate at funerals, he might not be in violation of the law.
made it a federal crime to “by force or by threat of force, injure, intimidate, or interfere with anyone … by reason of their race, color, religion, or national origin.”
I believe this has been used against cross burning etc...
That looks like one of those really fair and even and equal laws ... which in reality turns out to only work for certain approved groups.
On Saturday at a University American football match a chap went dressed up as Barack Obama wearing a noose.
That picture is appalling.
Can he be charged with incitement?
That would depend on local laws. And, given that US Courts have upheld the right of God Hates Fags to demonstrate at funerals, he might not be in violation of the law.
made it a federal crime to “by force or by threat of force, injure, intimidate, or interfere with anyone … by reason of their race, color, religion, or national origin.”
I believe this has been used against cross burning etc...
Doesn't look like the police consider it a crime, from previous reports:
On Saturday at a University American football match a chap went dressed up as Barack Obama wearing a noose.
That picture is appalling.
Can he be charged with incitement?
That would depend on local laws. And, given that US Courts have upheld the right of God Hates Fags to demonstrate at funerals, he might not be in violation of the law.
made it a federal crime to “by force or by threat of force, injure, intimidate, or interfere with anyone … by reason of their race, color, religion, or national origin.”
I believe this has been used against cross burning etc...
Surely Trump has been repeatedly breaching this law in his campaign speeches?
The First Amendment outranks the Civil Rights Act.
When people say it would be funny if Trump won, just look at that photo. It would be a disaster. It would unleash carnage.
Carnage from whom? The Democrats most likely based on the fact that the left rioted after the 2010 election with no pretext to do so and constantly arranged demonstrations that usually turned violent.
It's funny but the right in countries don't seem to demonstrate violently - the last major ';right-wing' demonstration - the Countryside Alliance - even left people behind to tidy up.
Similarly when the EDL or whoever hold a march it always seems to be the left (UAF or the equivalent) who get arrested for violence.
In Amercia I can point you to a Republican office being torched and a frail homeless woman being beaten up for preventing Trump's 'star' from being damaged again.
When people say it would be funny if Trump won, just look at that photo. It would be a disaster. It would unleash carnage.
Carnage from whom? The Democrats most likely based on the fact that the left rioted after the 2010 election with no pretext to do so and constantly arranged demonstrations that usually turned violent.
It's funny but the right in countries don't seem to demonstrate violently - the last major ';right-wing' demonstration - the Countryside Alliance - even left people behind to tidy up.
Similarly when the EDL or whoever hold a march it always seems to be the left (UAF or the equivalent) who get arrested for violence.
In Amercia I can point you to a Republican office being torched and a frail homeless woman being beaten up for preventing Trump's 'star' from being damaged again.
Christ you're a thick as pigshit.
I once accidentally attended an EDL march in 2009, trust me, the violence was all one way.
Have a look at yourself you Trump ramper, defending the EDL, you should be ashamed of yourself.
You accidentally attended an EDL rally? Is that a bit like accidentally ending up watching hardcore pornography on the internet?
It was in the centre of Manchester, I turned up at Piccadilly station, find out the taxis and trams were out of commission and I'd have to walk to my hotel on the other side of town.
The EDL were having their demo in Piccadilly Gardens which was on the route/right next door to Piccadilly station.
As an Asian chap with a white English girlfriend, for some reason I really annoyed them.
Plus their appalling lack of historical knowledge needed a rebuttal.
Virtually no Remainers voted Cameron to give him 'a kick up the arse', LDs and middle class Labour voters overwhelmingly backed Remain. Those who may have done so were white working class Labour voters who had no love for the EU anyway
@HYFUD Did you read much of the fallout from Brexit? Many traditional labour voters never knew the position their party held..... that was the reason why 60 shadow cabinet members walked out on Corbyn. Many Tories who voted Brexit didn't realise they were effectively signing a death warrant for Cameron whom they liked.
Cameron's ratings slumped badly in the referendum and he fell well below Boris's ratings, so the vast majority of the voters were not respecting him and would therefore be tempted to give him a kicking.
I voted remain despite being dismayed by the direction Cameron's government had started to follow. I think the Coalition government was much better than the Conservative Majority government. Cameron claimed he was a one nation tory yet did things that proved he was not one nation at all. Despite my initial scepticism of May she on domestic policy is far more one nation than Cameron ever proved. I kicked Cameron up the arse by voting Labour at the local elections for the first time in my life: it was a protest vote.
The policies that the Cameron majority government were enacting were indefensible from almost any rational viewpoint and almost insane. In one foul swoop they destroyed the entire basis of social housing with the 'housing and planning act' and they were trying to do the same thing to the public sector education system. Due to the time lag behind the development of policy and its real life effects and the spin and misinformation and absence of an opposition, people simply didn't recognise what was happening. In some ways Brexit is a relief, because it kicked these people out of government.
On Saturday at a University American football match a chap went dressed up as Barack Obama wearing a noose.
That picture is appalling.
Can he be charged with incitement?
That would depend on local laws. And, given that US Courts have upheld the right of God Hates Fags to demonstrate at funerals, he might not be in violation of the law.
made it a federal crime to “by force or by threat of force, injure, intimidate, or interfere with anyone … by reason of their race, color, religion, or national origin.”
I believe this has been used against cross burning etc...
That looks like one of those really fair and even and equal laws ... which in reality turns out to only work for certain approved groups.
Yes - groups under threat of being injured or intimidated. Are you so absolutely ignorant that you don't know why the Civil Rights Act was passed in the 1960s?
On Saturday at a University American football match a chap went dressed up as Barack Obama wearing a noose.
That picture is appalling.
Can he be charged with incitement?
That would depend on local laws. And, given that US Courts have upheld the right of God Hates Fags to demonstrate at funerals, he might not be in violation of the law.
made it a federal crime to “by force or by threat of force, injure, intimidate, or interfere with anyone … by reason of their race, color, religion, or national origin.”
I believe this has been used against cross burning etc...
Looking through it, the intimidation has to be intended to stop someone going to work, from voting, attending school, serving on a jury etc. So, KKK men standing outside a polling station, holding nooses, in order to intimidate black voters, would be caught by the Act. I doubt if this would be.
On Saturday at a University American football match a chap went dressed up as Barack Obama wearing a noose.
That picture is appalling.
Can he be charged with incitement?
That would depend on local laws. And, given that US Courts have upheld the right of God Hates Fags to demonstrate at funerals, he might not be in violation of the law.
made it a federal crime to “by force or by threat of force, injure, intimidate, or interfere with anyone … by reason of their race, color, religion, or national origin.”
I believe this has been used against cross burning etc...
Looking through it, the intimidation has to be intended to stop someone going to work, from voting, attending school, serving on a jury etc. So, KKK men standing outside a polling station, holding nooses, in order to intimidate black voters, would be caught by the Act. I doubt if this would be.
I'm pretty sure it has been used in the context of threatening symbology to intimidate black people from going through a neighbourhood.
When people say it would be funny if Trump won, just look at that photo. It would be a disaster. It would unleash carnage.
Carnage from whom? The Democrats most likely based on the fact that the left rioted after the 2010 election with no pretext to do so and constantly arranged demonstrations that usually turned violent.
It's funny but the right in countries don't seem to demonstrate violently - the last major ';right-wing' demonstration - the Countryside Alliance - even left people behind to tidy up.
Similarly when the EDL or whoever hold a march it always seems to be the left (UAF or the equivalent) who get arrested for violence.
In Amercia I can point you to a Republican office being torched and a frail homeless woman being beaten up for preventing Trump's 'star' from being damaged again.
Christ you're a thick as pigshit.
I once accidentally attended an EDL march in 2009, trust me, the violence was all one way.
Have a look at yourself you Trump ramper, defending the EDL, you should be ashamed of yourself.
You accidentally attended an EDL rally? Is that a bit like accidentally ending up watching hardcore pornography on the internet?
It was in the centre of Manchester, I turned up at Piccadilly station, find out the taxis and trams were out of commission and I'd have to walk to my hotel on the other side of town.
The EDL were having their demo in Piccadilly Gardens which was on the route/right next door to Piccadilly station.
As an Asian chap with a white English girlfriend, for some reason I really annoyed them.
Plus their appalling lack of historical knowledge needed a rebuttal.
Good Lord! Do you mean to say that they were expressing ignorance of the Second Punic war? It makes me ashamed to be English...
When people say it would be funny if Trump won, just look at that photo. It would be a disaster. It would unleash carnage.
Carnage from whom? The Democrats most likely based on the fact that the left rioted after the 2010 election with no pretext to do so and constantly arranged demonstrations that usually turned violent.
It's funny but the right in countries don't seem to demonstrate violently - the last major ';right-wing' demonstration - the Countryside Alliance - even left people behind to tidy up.
Similarly when the EDL or whoever hold a march it always seems to be the left (UAF or the equivalent) who get arrested for violence.
In Amercia I can point you to a Republican office being torched and a frail homeless woman being beaten up for preventing Trump's 'star' from being damaged again.
Christ you're a thick as pigshit.
I once accidentally attended an EDL march in 2009, trust me, the violence was all one way.
Have a look at yourself you Trump ramper, defending the EDL, you should be ashamed of yourself.
You accidentally attended an EDL rally? Is that a bit like accidentally ending up watching hardcore pornography on the internet?
It was in the centre of Manchester, I turned up at Piccadilly station, find out the taxis and trams were out of commission and I'd have to walk to my hotel on the other side of town.
The EDL were having their demo in Piccadilly Gardens which was on the route/right next door to Piccadilly station.
As an Asian chap with a white English girlfriend, for some reason I really annoyed them.
Plus their appalling lack of historical knowledge needed a rebuttal.
Good Lord! Do you mean to say that they were expressing ignorance of the Second Punic war? It makes me ashamed to be English...
Apparently St George was an Englishman and would hate all this immigration from the Middle East
On Saturday at a University American football match a chap went dressed up as Barack Obama wearing a noose.
That picture is appalling.
Can he be charged with incitement?
That would depend on local laws. And, given that US Courts have upheld the right of God Hates Fags to demonstrate at funerals, he might not be in violation of the law.
made it a federal crime to “by force or by threat of force, injure, intimidate, or interfere with anyone … by reason of their race, color, religion, or national origin.”
I believe this has been used against cross burning etc...
Surely Trump has been repeatedly breaching this law in his campaign speeches?
The First Amendment outranks the Civil Rights Act.
I would have thought the difference legally between burning crosses and this "Halloween" noose is that a burning cross is intimidation put on a victims land to threaten them and therefore is unprotected by the first amendment. This however disgusting is free speech on the racists own land.
If someone was to put a burning cross on their own front garden would that be illegal?
The policies that the Cameron majority government were enacting were indefensible from almost any rational viewpoint and almost insane. In one foul swoop they destroyed the entire basis of social housing with the 'housing and planning act' and they were trying to do the same thing to the public sector education system. Due to the time lag behind the development of policy and its real life effects and the spin and misinformation and absence of an opposition, people simply didn't recognise what was happening. In some ways Brexit is a relief, because it kicked these people out of government.
I completely agree with you. I think that Cameron will go down in history very negatively indeed. He is as cynical as they come.
On Saturday at a University American football match a chap went dressed up as Barack Obama wearing a noose.
That picture is appalling.
Can he be charged with incitement?
That would depend on local laws. And, given that US Courts have upheld the right of God Hates Fags to demonstrate at funerals, he might not be in violation of the law.
made it a federal crime to “by force or by threat of force, injure, intimidate, or interfere with anyone … by reason of their race, color, religion, or national origin.”
I believe this has been used against cross burning etc...
Surely Trump has been repeatedly breaching this law in his campaign speeches?
The First Amendment outranks the Civil Rights Act.
I would have thought the difference legally between burning crosses and this "Halloween" noose is that a burning cross is intimidation put on a victims land to threaten them and therefore is unprotected by the first amendment. This however disgusting is free speech on the racists own land.
If someone was to put a burning cross on their own front garden would that be illegal?
I can find lots of reports online in the last ten years of black or black-looking mannequins being "lynched" but none suggesting a police response.
When people say it would be funny if Trump won, just look at that photo. It would be a disaster. It would unleash carnage.
Carnage from whom? The Democrats most likely based on the fact that the left rioted after the 2010 election with no pretext to do so and constantly arranged demonstrations that usually turned violent.
It's funny but the right in countries don't seem to demonstrate violently - the last major ';right-wing' demonstration - the Countryside Alliance - even left people behind to tidy up.
Similarly when the EDL or whoever hold a march it always seems to be the left (UAF or the equivalent) who get arrested for violence.
In Amercia I can point you to a Republican office being torched and a frail homeless woman being beaten up for preventing Trump's 'star' from being damaged again.
Christ you're a thick as pigshit.
I once accidentally attended an EDL march in 2009, trust me, the violence was all one way.
Have a look at yourself you Trump ramper, defending the EDL, you should be ashamed of yourself.
You accidentally attended an EDL rally? Is that a bit like accidentally ending up watching hardcore pornography on the internet?
It was in the centre of Manchester, I turned up at Piccadilly station, find out the taxis and trams were out of commission and I'd have to walk to my hotel on the other side of town.
The EDL were having their demo in Piccadilly Gardens which was on the route/right next door to Piccadilly station.
As an Asian chap with a white English girlfriend, for some reason I really annoyed them.
Plus their appalling lack of historical knowledge needed a rebuttal.
Good Lord! Do you mean to say that they were expressing ignorance of the Second Punic war? It makes me ashamed to be English...
Apparently St George was an Englishman and would hate all this immigration from the Middle East
Of course! If he were foreign then he wouldn't have an English name and flag. The EDL do have a point.
On Saturday at a University American football match a chap went dressed up as Barack Obama wearing a noose.
That picture is appalling.
Can he be charged with incitement?
That would depend on local laws. And, given that US Courts have upheld the right of God Hates Fags to demonstrate at funerals, he might not be in violation of the law.
made it a federal crime to “by force or by threat of force, injure, intimidate, or interfere with anyone … by reason of their race, color, religion, or national origin.”
I believe this has been used against cross burning etc...
Surely Trump has been repeatedly breaching this law in his campaign speeches?
The First Amendment outranks the Civil Rights Act.
I would have thought the difference legally between burning crosses and this "Halloween" noose is that a burning cross is intimidation put on a victims land to threaten them and therefore is unprotected by the first amendment. This however disgusting is free speech on the racists own land.
If someone was to put a burning cross on their own front garden would that be illegal?
I can find lots of reports online in the last ten years of black or black-looking mannequins being "lynched" but none suggesting a police response.
Cross burning is banned - yes, even on your own land - generally at state level.
That tweet reminds me there was a 15 year old black boy a couple weeks ago that had a noose tied round his neck in a Mississippi school by a group of white schoolmates. America has come a long way but has a way to go.
When people say it would be funny if Trump won, just look at that photo. It would be a disaster. It would unleash carnage.
Carnage from whom? The Democrats most likely based on the fact that the left rioted after the 2010 election with no pretext to do so and constantly arranged demonstrations that usually turned violent.
It's funny but the right in countries don't seem to demonstrate violently - the last major ';right-wing' demonstration - the Countryside Alliance - even left people behind to tidy up.
Similarly when the EDL or whoever hold a march it always seems to be the left (UAF or the equivalent) who get arrested for violence.
In Amercia I can point you to a Republican office being torched and a frail homeless woman being beaten up for preventing Trump's 'star' from being damaged again.
Christ you're a thick as pigshit.
I once accidentally attended an EDL march in 2009, trust me, the violence was all one way.
Have a look at yourself you Trump ramper, defending the EDL, you should be ashamed of yourself.
You accidentally attended an EDL rally? Is that a bit like accidentally ending up watching hardcore pornography on the internet?
It was in the centre of Manchester, I turned up at Piccadilly station, find out the taxis and trams were out of commission and I'd have to walk to my hotel on the other side of town.
The EDL were having their demo in Piccadilly Gardens which was on the route/right next door to Piccadilly station.
As an Asian chap with a white English girlfriend, for some reason I really annoyed them.
Plus their appalling lack of historical knowledge needed a rebuttal.
Good Lord! Do you mean to say that they were expressing ignorance of the Second Punic war? It makes me ashamed to be English...
Apparently St George was an Englishman and would hate all this immigration from the Middle East
Of course! If he were foreign then he wouldn't have an English name and flag. The EDL do have a point.
Fictional furiners coming here, killing endangered species (have you seen any dragons) - bet he didn't have a work permit for dragon slaying either. And disposing of the corpse afterwards.. no mention of the paperwork that getting rid of a multi ton animal corpse generates... so illegal disposal of waste as well.
When people say it would be funny if Trump won, just look at that photo. It would be a disaster. It would unleash carnage.
Carnage from whom? The Democrats most likely based on the fact that the left rioted after the 2010 election with no pretext to do so and constantly arranged demonstrations that usually turned violent.
It's funny but the right in countries don't seem to demonstrate violently - the last major ';right-wing' demonstration - the Countryside Alliance - even left people behind to tidy up.
Similarly when the EDL or whoever hold a march it always seems to be the left (UAF or the equivalent) who get arrested for violence.
In Amercia I can point you to a Republican office being torched and a frail homeless woman being beaten up for preventing Trump's 'star' from being damaged again.
Christ you're a thick as pigshit.
I once accidentally attended an EDL march in 2009, trust me, the violence was all one way.
Have a look at yourself you Trump ramper, defending the EDL, you should be ashamed of yourself.
You accidentally attended an EDL rally? Is that a bit like accidentally ending up watching hardcore pornography on the internet?
It was in the centre of Manchester, I turned up at Piccadilly station, find out the taxis and trams were out of commission and I'd have to walk to my hotel on the other side of town.
The EDL were having their demo in Piccadilly Gardens which was on the route/right next door to Piccadilly station.
As an Asian chap with a white English girlfriend, for some reason I really annoyed them.
Plus their appalling lack of historical knowledge needed a rebuttal.
Good Lord! Do you mean to say that they were expressing ignorance of the Second Punic war? It makes me ashamed to be English...
Apparently St George was an Englishman and would hate all this immigration from the Middle East
Of course! If he were foreign then he wouldn't have an English name and flag. The EDL do have a point.
Fictional furiners coming here, killing endangered species (have you seen any dragons) - bet he didn't have a work permit for dragon slaying either. And disposing of the corpse afterwards.. no mention of the paperwork that getting rid of a multi ton animal corpse generates... so illegal disposal of waste as well.
When people say it would be funny if Trump won, just look at that photo. It would be a disaster. It would unleash carnage.
Carnage from whom? The Democrats most likely based on the fact that the left rioted after the 2010 election with no pretext to do so and constantly arranged demonstrations that usually turned violent.
It's funny but the right in countries don't seem to demonstrate violently - the last major ';right-wing' demonstration - the Countryside Alliance - even left people behind to tidy up.
Similarly when the EDL or whoever hold a march it always seems to be the left (UAF or the equivalent) who get arrested for violence.
In Amercia I can point you to a Republican office being torched and a frail homeless woman being beaten up for preventing Trump's 'star' from being damaged again.
Christ you're a thick as pigshit.
I once accidentally attended an EDL march in 2009, trust me, the violence was all one way.
Have a look at yourself you Trump ramper, defending the EDL, you should be ashamed of yourself.
You accidentally attended an EDL rally? Is that a bit like accidentally ending up watching hardcore pornography on the internet?
It was in the centre of Manchester, I turned up at Piccadilly station, find out the taxis and trams were out of commission and I'd have to walk to my hotel on the other side of town.
The EDL were having their demo in Piccadilly Gardens which was on the route/right next door to Piccadilly station.
As an Asian chap with a white English girlfriend, for some reason I really annoyed them.
Plus their appalling lack of historical knowledge needed a rebuttal.
Good Lord! Do you mean to say that they were expressing ignorance of the Second Punic war? It makes me ashamed to be English...
Apparently St George was an Englishman and would hate all this immigration from the Middle East
Of course! If he were foreign then he wouldn't have an English name and flag. The EDL do have a point.
Fictional furiners coming here, killing endangered species (have you seen any dragons) - bet he didn't have a work permit for dragon slaying either. And disposing of the corpse afterwards.. no mention of the paperwork that getting rid of a multi ton animal corpse generates... so illegal disposal of waste as well.
@TSE...I think your response earlier was being kind to pigshit. If I was pigshit, I probably would cry foul being compared so unfavourably to such a ludicrous comment...
On Saturday at a University American football match a chap went dressed up as Barack Obama wearing a noose.
That picture is appalling.
Can he be charged with incitement?
That would depend on local laws. And, given that US Courts have upheld the right of God Hates Fags to demonstrate at funerals, he might not be in violation of the law.
made it a federal crime to “by force or by threat of force, injure, intimidate, or interfere with anyone … by reason of their race, color, religion, or national origin.”
I believe this has been used against cross burning etc...
Surely Trump has been repeatedly breaching this law in his campaign speeches?
The First Amendment outranks the Civil Rights Act.
I would have thought the difference legally between burning crosses and this "Halloween" noose is that a burning cross is intimidation put on a victims land to threaten them and therefore is unprotected by the first amendment. This however disgusting is free speech on the racists own land.
If someone was to put a burning cross on their own front garden would that be illegal?
I can find lots of reports online in the last ten years of black or black-looking mannequins being "lynched" but none suggesting a police response.
Cross burning is banned - yes, even on your own land - generally at state level.
SCOTUS ruled in 2003 that it's lawful to ban cross-burning which is intended to intimidate, but not otherwise. To remove this mannequin, I presume the authorities would have to prove an intent to intimidate.
It's almost as if we are going to end up spending a shed load more than £350 million a week on mitigating the voluntary decision we are going to take to leave the single market.
The Australian Prime Minister has said that asylum seekers who try to sneak into Australia by boat will never be able to enter the country again - even as a tourist. The federal government is set to ban illegal immigrants under new legislation and will only bend the rules if it is in the public interest.
The ban would apply whether or not they were found to be refugees and extends to all types of visas, including tourist and business categories.
When people say it would be funny if Trump won, just look at that photo. It would be a disaster. It would unleash carnage.
:
In Amercia I can point you to a Republican office being torched and a frail homeless woman being beaten up for preventing Trump's 'star' from being damaged again.
Christ you're a thick as pigshit.
I once accidentally attended an EDL march in 2009, trust me, the violence was all one way.
Have a look at yourself you Trump ramper, defending the EDL, you should be ashamed of yourself.
You accidentally attended an EDL rally? Is that a bit like accidentally ending up watching hardcore pornography on the internet?
It was in the centre of Manchester, I turned up at Piccadilly station, find out the taxis and trams were out of commission and I'd have to walk to my hotel on the other side of town.
The EDL were having their demo in Piccadilly Gardens which was on the route/right next door to Piccadilly station.
As an Asian chap with a white English girlfriend, for some reason I really annoyed them.
Plus their appalling lack of historical knowledge needed a rebuttal.
Good Lord! Do you mean to say that they were expressing ignorance of the Second Punic war? It makes me ashamed to be English...
Apparently St George was an Englishman and would hate all this immigration from the Middle East
Of course! If he were foreign then he wouldn't have an English name and flag. The EDL do have a point.
Fictional furiners coming here, killing endangered species (have you seen any dragons) - bet he didn't have a work permit for dragon slaying either. And disposing of the corpse afterwards.. no mention of the paperwork that getting rid of a multi ton animal corpse generates... so illegal disposal of waste as well.
Last one is best - he wasn't wearing HiViz.
Throw the book at him, I say
A suit of armour is fairly hi viz.
And the book would bounce off it...
In real life, most armour was given a dull finish. The polished plate look was for show offs, and was extremely unpopular among their servants - mild steel basically, rusts if you look at it - they would have to polish it non stop.
On Saturday at a University American football match a chap went dressed up as Barack Obama wearing a noose.
That picture is appalling.
Can he be charged with incitement?
That would depend on local laws. And, given that US Courts have upheld the right of God Hates Fags to demonstrate at funerals, he might not be in violation of the law.
made it a federal crime to “by force or by threat of force, injure, intimidate, or interfere with anyone … by reason of their race, color, religion, or national origin.”
I believe this has been used against cross burning etc...
Surely Trump has been repeatedly breaching this law in his campaign speeches?
The First Amendment outranks the Civil Rights Act.
I would have thought the difference legally between burning crosses and this "Halloween" noose is that a burning cross is intimidation put on a victims land to threaten them and therefore is unprotected by the first amendment. This however disgusting is free speech on the racists own land.
If someone was to put a burning cross on their own front garden would that be illegal?
I can find lots of reports online in the last ten years of black or black-looking mannequins being "lynched" but none suggesting a police response.
Cross burning is banned - yes, even on your own land - generally at state level.
SCOTUS ruled in 2003 that it's lawful to ban cross-burning which is intended to intimidate, but not otherwise. To remove this mannequin, I presume the authorities would have to prove an intent to intimidate.
I don't know why people are complaining about this guy. Surely Lefties should be trying to understand why he did it? Or why it's all someone else's fault? Or perhaps a Celeb could go and apologise to him on behalf of the human race?
On Saturday at a University American football match a chap went dressed up as Barack Obama wearing a noose.
That picture is appalling.
Can he be charged with incitement?
That would depend on local laws. And, given that US Courts have upheld the right of God Hates Fags to demonstrate at funerals, he might not be in violation of the law.
made it a federal crime to “by force or by threat of force, injure, intimidate, or interfere with anyone … by reason of their race, color, religion, or national origin.”
I believe this has been used against cross burning etc...
Surely Trump has been repeatedly breaching this law in his campaign speeches?
The First Amendment outranks the Civil Rights Act.
I would have thought the difference legally between burning crosses and this "Halloween" noose is that a burning cross is intimidation put on a victims land to threaten them and therefore is unprotected by the first amendment. This however disgusting is free speech on the racists own land.
If someone was to put a burning cross on their own front garden would that be illegal?
I can find lots of reports online in the last ten years of black or black-looking mannequins being "lynched" but none suggesting a police response.
I mean no one in this country would be prepared to make mannequinns of, say, a Roman Catholic, and throw them on bonfires.
Trump was right to say Weiner was a "collector of information". That is a staggering number of emails. Altough I wouldn't be surprised if a significant number of them related to social media, dating and adult websites.
It's almost as if we are going to end up spending a shed load more than £350 million a week on mitigating the voluntary decision we are going to take to leave the single market.
Yes, special measures for, er, pretty much everyone. The entire project undermined by a series of expensive exceptions. Who could have imagined it?
Trump was right to say Weiner was a "collector of information". That is a staggering number of emails. Altough I wouldn't be surprised if a significant number of them related to social media, dating and adult websites.
It's almost as if we are going to end up spending a shed load more than £350 million a week on mitigating the voluntary decision we are going to take to leave the single market.
People are welcome to try to convince the public of the needlessness of that decision and reverse the intention.
It's almost as if we are going to end up spending a shed load more than £350 million a week on mitigating the voluntary decision we are going to take to leave the single market.
Yes, special measures for, er, pretty much everyone. The entire project undermined by a series of expensive exceptions. Who could have imagined it?
A more plausible explanation is that the government intends to remain in the customs union for a lengthy interim period.
Trump was right to say Weiner was a "collector of information". That is a staggering number of emails. Altough I wouldn't be surprised if a significant number of them related to social media, dating and adult websites.
And someone said earlier they'd get through them in a few days ...
If they know what they want to find then the search function would make it much quicker.........or simply typing in Hilary ?
That makes several assumptions, none of which might be accurate. You can start with simple searches, but someone will probably have to go through every one, for the sake of thoroughness.
Comments
Clinton leads Trump by 4 points in ALASKA. FOOKING ALASKA
http://origin-nyi.thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/303477-poll-clinton-up-4-points-in-alaska
I once accidentally attended an EDL march in 2009, trust me, the violence was all one way.
Have a look at yourself you Trump ramper, defending the EDL, you should be ashamed of yourself.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1968
made it a federal crime to “by force or by threat of force, injure, intimidate, or interfere with anyone … by reason of their race, color, religion, or national origin.”
I believe this has been used against cross burning etc...
https://www.ft.com/content/5107a124-9eb5-11e6-891e-abe238dee8e2
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/james-comey-is-damaging-our-democracy/2016/10/29/894d0f5e-9e49-11e6-a0ed-ab0774c1eaa5_story.html
Decades ago, the department decided that in the 60-day period before an election, the balance should be struck against even returning indictments involving individuals running for office, as well as against the disclosure of any investigative steps. The reasoning was that, however important it might be for Justice to do its job, and however important it might be for the public to know what Justice knows, because such allegations could not be adjudicated, such actions or disclosures risked undermining the political process. A memorandum reflecting this choice has been issued every four years by multiple attorneys general for a very long time, including in 2016...
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/ak/alaska_trump_vs_clinton_vs_johnson_vs_stein-6114.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/27/nyregion/27noose.html
https://twitter.com/SoCal4Trump/status/792196786542620672?ref_src=twsrc^tfw
The EDL were having their demo in Piccadilly Gardens which was on the route/right next door to Piccadilly station.
As an Asian chap with a white English girlfriend, for some reason I really annoyed them.
Plus their appalling lack of historical knowledge needed a rebuttal.
Satanists for Hillary? Or Amageddon wishers for Hillary?
Gotta love the public!
Are his crimes so serious he cannot get early release?
https://twitter.com/liamstack/status/792599532680966144
Although that said I went to a really good coffee shop when I was in Salt Lake City.
Edit: I see Trump leaning super hard on SCOTUS.
If someone was to put a burning cross on their own front garden would that be illegal?
The policies that the Cameron majority government were enacting were indefensible from almost any rational viewpoint and almost insane. In one foul swoop they destroyed the entire basis of social housing with the 'housing and planning act' and they were trying to do the same thing to the public sector education system. Due to the time lag behind the development of policy and its real life effects and the spin and misinformation and absence of an opposition, people simply didn't recognise what was happening. In some ways Brexit is a relief, because it kicked these people out of government.
I completely agree with you. I think that Cameron will go down in history very negatively indeed. He is as cynical as they come.
Presumably quite a few of them are about Weiner enlargement.
I'll get my coat...
:-)
Last one is best - he wasn't wearing HiViz.
Throw the book at him, I say
A suit of armour is fairly hi viz.
And the book would bounce off it...
https://twitter.com/msmithsonpb/status/792836227116437512
The Australian Prime Minister has said that asylum seekers who try to sneak into Australia by boat will never be able to enter the country again - even as a tourist. The federal government is set to ban illegal immigrants under new legislation and will only bend the rules if it is in the public interest.
The ban would apply whether or not they were found to be refugees and extends to all types of visas, including tourist and business categories.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3887316/Is-answer-Calais-migrants-Australian-PM-says-caught-sneaking-country-NEVER-allowed-tourist.html#ixzz4ObbiQ0wV
I don't know why people are complaining about this guy. Surely Lefties should be trying to understand why he did it? Or why it's all someone else's fault? Or perhaps a Celeb could go and apologise to him on behalf of the human race?
/sarcasm
Those senate races are much closer, much more critical to the big picture of movement republicans than 4 years of the presidency.
They decide the shape of the Court.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucy_Allan_(politician)
Why chose the lesser evil?
https://twitter.com/sahilkapur/status/792843842479239168
https://twitter.com/samsteinhp/status/792845597506101248
They are looking for new front pages to reset the narrative.
https://twitter.com/Conservative_VW/status/792832545607954433
Just put a £100 on Trump today.