But, isn't this the slippery slope? There is a possibility that there will be a huge backlash against ALL Muslims and ALL ethnic minorities. After 'cleansing' out Islam, what's next?
The whole point is that it targets only those who seek to live in a fundamentalist manner, liberal/secular Muslims who don't feel the need to pray five times a day or don't force their wives and daughters to wear burkas etc... would be unaffected by the policy changes. It's not about targeting a certain type of person, it's about targeting certain types of behaviour. The law applies to everyone.
How much longer can France keep taking this punishment? You either go to war or you vote in someone like Le Pen, things are about to get nasty either way.
War with where though? The problem is a stateless concept. Stamping down ISIS seems like the only way to contain matters, for a time, but it'll be back.
Best wishes to all tonight - let harsh words be forgotten in the aftermath.
Here's one thing - suddenly Brexit seems that little bit more sensible. I'll bet there's less Bremorse tomorrow, as people digest this hideous news.
Some expert on BBC News just said France is "playing catch up" in regards to terrorism prevention. But I'd have thought as a member of the EU etc....
Could the reality possibly be that being part of the EU doesn't make a blind bit of difference one way or another to a country's security from terror threats?
I can't sleep. We have had so many happy times in France. We had a lovely cottage in Manse for many years and the locals were always warm, friendly and welcoming. Its my second favourite country in the world. So. More PB.
The answer is: it depends. No government can protect its citizens from the determined lone wolf or small cell. We should remember that we don't even know that it was a Muslim; we're just assuming. That's sad in and of itself.
Schengen just adds to the headaches. In addition to your local threat register, you have to worry about your neighbours' radicals too.
We tend to think about the EU from our perspective. You may think its British exceptionalism, but we have one of the world's great SIGINT agencies (bolstered by UKUSA, excellent intelligence agencies and a well funded, relatively incorruptible police service.
That's not true across the bloc. From an intelligence perspective there are far more consumer countries than producers. The smaller nations gain a great deal from the collective security apparatus of the EU.
The 'successful' attacks seem to be small cells or individuals acting alone. Nothing for spys to see.
One of the goals of PREVENT is to head things off at the pass. Few people move directly from ordinary joe to Jihadi, in the same way that serial killers often start with animal cruelty. Intelligence can help identify that process of radicalisation.
Delusional bullshit. The UK has simply been lucky. We have just as many horrible Islamist nutters, and just as much loathing of the West in certain Muslim communities.
Plus we had mass Islamic racist gang rape of white girls, pretty uniquely.
Nice will very likely happen in the UK, in some form.
So multiple countries within Europe have been simply lucky? I don't claim that UK has never had its issues with terrorism or that Rotheram never happened either. But we have never suffered three terrorists attacks from Islamic extremists in under two years. Nor has any other European country, IIRC. This is unprecedented and that is why it is so incredibly shocking.
Apparently the driver's accomplice is on the run. Hence the continued police anxiety.
Or so Twitter says. Who knows.
BBC News suggesting two further incidents, possibly with hostages. Police seen rushing into a nightclub with stretchers. (Of course, it may just be that was being used as a temporary field hospital.)
Tim Marshall Le Figaro and others say 73 dead in Nice attack. Truck drove up to 2 kilometres thru crowds before halting.
2kms!!
Sadly the death toll will probably be a lot higher than 73 if it really was 2km.
Sometimes death tolls are overstated early on. Hopefully, it's the case here.
The most frightening, dreadful thing is that it is French people doing this in France. There is an Islamic disease. We cannot beat about the bush here. Unfortunately, Moslems have to accept that only they can find the solution. I wish it were otherwise, but it's not.
I can see how Muslims only going to Muslim schools and not integrating with the rest of the population would cause issues. But I am not sure how arranged marriages or wives from the Middle East are causing radicalisation.
I don't think EPG wants to put up with any of the things you listed at all. I certainly don't. I just think he/she is concerned about generalising an entire group of people. There are more than a billion Muslims on planet earth. I definitely think there is an issue with radicalization within their communities without a doubt but I personally do not feel likes of Marine Le Pen are the answer. And others such as @John_M and @Jeremy_Brown have also pointed to disaffection as a cause as well as some of the values said in the name of Islam.
It creates another layer of insulation between Muslims and non-Muslims in Europe. Intermarriage among immigrant and minorities is the lowest for Muslims in the UK, I can't imagine the situation is vastly different in France.
Disaffected British youth don't blow everyone else up. Disaffection may be an indirect cause, but Islam lights the fuse (just as Brexit has done for our own idiots wrt racial attacks, unfortunately). Radical Imams and websites channel that disaffection into violence against non-Muslims using the violence and justification for violence against non-Muslims contained in the Koran.
I do agree that Radicals within the Muslim community take advantage of the disaffection that some Muslims may feel and use that to radicalise young Muslims. There does appear to be a unique level of disaffection in France, that I cannot really see in this country in regard to the Banlieues. From the little I have read about them, I cannot sight many places if Britain that are quite like them. Nonetheless, many countries in Europe have a colonial history. Britain certainly does, and yet in terms of integration we do not seem to have anywhere near the kind of issues France has had (and still has) with 2nd and 3rd generations.
Delusional bullshit. The UK has simply been lucky. We have just as many horrible Islamist nutters, and just as much loathing of the West in certain Muslim communities.
Plus we had mass Islamic racist gang rape of white girls, pretty uniquely.
Nice will very likely happen in the UK, in some form.
Agreed. The only difference between us and France is a superior intelligence service, it seems. Both France and the UK share a postcolonial guilt that has led to multiculralism on a huge scale. That's fine when it includes people who share the same norms, beliefs and values as the wider population....
Delusional bullshit. The UK has simply been lucky. We have just as many horrible Islamist nutters, and just as much loathing of the West in certain Muslim communities.
Plus we had mass Islamic racist gang rape of white girls, pretty uniquely.
Nice will very likely happen in the UK, in some form.
Lucky and to a certain degree better equipped. It's going to be tough to lose Theresa May as Home Secretary because she actually did a pretty good job in keeping us well protected in terms of funding for anti-terror programmes and protecting intelligence budgets etc...
IIRC it was her and Hammond who got together and went above George's head to the PM to get real terms protection for the intelligence budgets. It's why May and Osborne never really got on.
If someone had had a stinger available they might have been able to stop the truck earlier. Would they work with trucks?
Stinger is a SAM. A spike strip would likely be ineffective. Shooting the engine might work. Killing the driver would be very difficult. An articulated lorry is a horribly effective weapon.
Even if France elects Le Pen and they stop all Muslim migration they still have an enemy within. An enemy that wants to completely destroy the French way of life. Its not about as some say a marginalised minority because many have gone to fight in Syria from the west with very middle class backgrounds, even medical students. This is about ideology that's it and Hollande needs to get a bloody grip.
Thank you to our security services for keeping us safe, and thank Allah we have May as PM.
Apparently there were fireworks going on at the time of the attack. Would have made it more difficult for people to realise what was happening at the start. Probably deliberate from the attacker.
Delusional bullshit. The UK has simply been lucky. We have just as many horrible Islamist nutters, and just as much loathing of the West in certain Muslim communities.
Plus we had mass Islamic racist gang rape of white girls, pretty uniquely.
Nice will very likely happen in the UK, in some form.
So multiple countries within Europe have been simply lucky? I don't claim that UK has never had its issues with terrorism or that Rotheram never happened either. But we have never suffered three terrorists attacks from Islamic extremists in under two years. Nor has any other European country, IIRC. This is unprecedented and that is why it is so incredibly shocking.
The UK and France are fairly unique in Europe in terms of the post colonial settlement. No other country has received such high levels of Islamic migration as France or the UK. Only Germany but they have secular since the 1920s Turkish migration rather than Pakistani or North African migration. We simply can't compare the situation on France to any other European nation other than the UK and vice versa.
Apparently there were fireworks going on at the time of the attack. Would have made it more difficult for people to realise what was happening at the start. Probably deliberate from the attacker.
Delusional bullshit. The UK has simply been lucky. We have just as many horrible Islamist nutters, and just as much loathing of the West in certain Muslim communities.
Plus we had mass Islamic racist gang rape of white girls, pretty uniquely.
Nice will very likely happen in the UK, in some form.
So multiple countries within Europe have been simply lucky? I don't claim that UK has never had its issues with terrorism or that Rotheram never happened either. But we have never suffered three terrorists attacks from Islamic extremists in under two years. Nor has any other European country, IIRC. This is unprecedented and that is why it is so incredibly shocking.
The UK and France are fairly unique in Europe in terms of the post colonial settlement. No other country has received such high levels of Islamic migration as France or the UK. Only Germany but they have secular since the 1920s Turkish migration rather than Pakistani or North African migration. We simply can't compare the situation on France to any other European nation other than the UK and vice versa.
Delusional bullshit. The UK has simply been lucky. We have just as many horrible Islamist nutters, and just as much loathing of the West in certain Muslim communities.
Plus we had mass Islamic racist gang rape of white girls, pretty uniquely.
Nice will very likely happen in the UK, in some form.
So multiple countries within Europe have been simply lucky? I don't claim that UK has never had its issues with terrorism or that Rotheram never happened either. But we have never suffered three terrorists attacks from Islamic extremists in under two years. Nor has any other European country, IIRC. This is unprecedented and that is why it is so incredibly shocking.
The UK and France are fairly unique in Europe in terms of the post colonial settlement. No other country has received such high levels of Islamic migration as France or the UK. Only Germany but they have secular since the 1920s Turkish migration rather than Pakistani or North African migration. We simply can't compare the situation on France to any other European nation other than the UK and vice versa.
Ok. I have heard that Germany has had their issues with Turkish integration, but it is obviously not to anywhere near the extent that we and particularly France have had. I wonder what makes Muslims of Pakistani or North African descent (seemingly) more likely to be radicalised than those of Turkish origin? Either way, we've got to a find a solution to this problem.
Five prediction methods outlined: * model from Moody's Analytics * Norpoth's model based on primary performance * Names ending in "n" * First-time Olympic holder * Allan Lichtman's questionnaire
Looks like it was going at about 30mph. Just a guess.
There is a (non graphic) video of the truck approaching the crowd, it was going along the Promenade at a very slow speed and as it approached the crowd (hidden behind trees) it accelerates, I could easily see it hitting 40 before it starts to hit the crowd.
Sadly, I think the idea that there are many more than 70 dead is likely to be accurate, it was a huge crowd.
Fox News is taking the Sky News feed. One of the Sky folks said that 'Promenade des Anglais' meant 'Street of Angels'. Obviously they haven't heard about Brexit yet.
Delusional bullshit. The UK has simply been lucky. We have just as many horrible Islamist nutters, and just as much loathing of the West in certain Muslim communities.
Plus we had mass Islamic racist gang rape of white girls, pretty uniquely.
Nice will very likely happen in the UK, in some form.
So multiple countries within Europe have been simply lucky? I don't claim that UK has never had its issues with terrorism or that Rotheram never happened either. But we have never suffered three terrorists attacks from Islamic extremists in under two years. Nor has any other European country, IIRC. This is unprecedented and that is why it is so incredibly shocking.
The UK and France are fairly unique in Europe in terms of the post colonial settlement. No other country has received such high levels of Islamic migration as France or the UK. Only Germany but they have secular since the 1920s Turkish migration rather than Pakistani or North African migration. We simply can't compare the situation on France to any other European nation other than the UK and vice versa.
Ok. I have heard that Germany has had their issues with Turkish integration, but it is obviously not to anywhere near the extent that we and particularly France have had. I wonder what makes Muslims of Pakistani or North African descent (seemingly) more likely to be radicalised than those of Turkish origin? Either way, we've got to a find a solution to this problem.
I suspect that it is more to do with the socio-economic status of the immigrants, The poorer and more marginalised they are, the more likely they are to be radicalised. France has the Banlieus(?) which are basically ghettos for poor young muslims.
How much longer can France keep taking this punishment? You either go to war or you vote in someone like Le Pen, things are about to get nasty either way.
War with where though? The problem is a stateless concept. Stamping down ISIS seems like the only way to contain matters, for a time, but it'll be back.
Best wishes to all tonight - let harsh words be forgotten in the aftermath.
Here's one thing - suddenly Brexit seems that little bit more sensible. I'll bet there's less Bremorse tomorrow, as people digest this hideous news.
Some expert on BBC News just said France is "playing catch up" in regards to terrorism prevention. But I'd have thought as a member of the EU etc....
Could the reality possibly be that being part of the EU doesn't make a blind bit of difference one way or another to a country's security from terror threats?
I can't sleep. We have had so many happy times in France. We had a lovely cottage in Manse for many years and the locals were always warm, friendly and welcoming. Its my second favourite country in the world. So. More PB.
The answer is: it depends. No government can protect its citizens from the determined lone wolf or small cell. We should remember that we don't even know that it was a Muslim; we're just assuming. That's sad in and of itself.
Schengen just adds to the headaches. In addition to your local threat register, you have to worry about your neighbours' radicals too.
We tend to think about the EU from our perspective. You may think its British exceptionalism, but we have one of the world's great SIGINT agencies (bolstered by UKUSA, excellent intelligence agencies and a well funded, relatively incorruptible police service.
That's not true across the bloc. From an intelligence perspective there are far more consumer countries than producers. The smaller nations gain a great deal from the collective security apparatus of the EU.
The 'successful' attacks seem to be small cells or individuals acting alone. Nothing for spys to see.
One of the goals of PREVENT is to head things off at the pass. Few people move directly from ordinary joe to Jihadi, in the same way that serial killers often start with animal cruelty. Intelligence can help identify that process of radicalisation.
PREVENT has zero support in the Muslim community in Britain BTW.
Delusional bullshit. The UK has simply been lucky. We have just as many horrible Islamist nutters, and just as much loathing of the West in certain Muslim communities.
Plus we had mass Islamic racist gang rape of white girls, pretty uniquely.
Nice will very likely happen in the UK, in some form.
So multiple countries within Europe have been simply lucky? I don't claim that UK has never had its issues with terrorism or that Rotheram never happened either. But we have never suffered three terrorists attacks from Islamic extremists in under two years. Nor has any other European country, IIRC. This is unprecedented and that is why it is so incredibly shocking.
The UK and France are fairly unique in Europe in terms of the post colonial settlement. No other country has received such high levels of Islamic migration as France or the UK. Only Germany but they have secular since the 1920s Turkish migration rather than Pakistani or North African migration. We simply can't compare the situation on France to any other European nation other than the UK and vice versa.
Ok. I have heard that Germany has had their issues with Turkish integration, but it is obviously not to anywhere near the extent that we and particularly France have had. I wonder what makes Muslims of Pakistani or North African descent (seemingly) more likely to be radicalised than those of Turkish origin? Either way, we've got to a find a solution to this problem.
Thank Atatürk for Turkish (relative) secularism. I had Turkish friends as a kid and other than a passing mention that they went to "church" on a Friday night - which I thought a novel time of the week - there was nothing to suggest they were Muslim. Those days are going, I fear.
Another casualty of the French attack - Trump has cancelled his scheduled press conference to announce his VP nomination, which was to be at 11am EDT tomorrow.
Delusional bullshit. The UK has simply been lucky. We have just as many horrible Islamist nutters, and just as much loathing of the West in certain Muslim communities.
Plus we had mass Islamic racist gang rape of white girls, pretty uniquely.
Nice will very likely happen in the UK, in some form.
So multiple countries within Europe have been simply lucky? I don't claim that UK has never had its issues with terrorism or that Rotheram never happened either. But we have never suffered three terrorists attacks from Islamic extremists in under two years. Nor has any other European country, IIRC. This is unprecedented and that is why it is so incredibly shocking.
The UK and France are fairly unique in Europe in terms of the post colonial settlement. No other country has received such high levels of Islamic migration as France or the UK. Only Germany but they have secular since the 1920s Turkish migration rather than Pakistani or North African migration. We simply can't compare the situation on France to any other European nation other than the UK and vice versa.
Ok. I have heard that Germany has had their issues with Turkish integration, but it is obviously not to anywhere near the extent that we and particularly France have had. I wonder what makes Muslims of Pakistani or North African descent (seemingly) more likely to be radicalised than those of Turkish origin? Either way, we've got to a find a solution to this problem.
Thank Atatürk for Turkish (relative) secularism. I had Turkish friends as a kid and other than a passing mention that they went to "church" on a Friday night - which I thought a novel time of the week - there was nothing to suggest they were Muslim. Those days are going, I fear.
Southern Baptists go to church on a Wednesday evening. Unfortunately those days are not going.
Fox News is taking the Sky News feed. One of the Sky folks said that 'Promenade des Anglais' meant 'Street of Angels'. Obviously they haven't heard about Brexit yet.
Brokenwheel: maybe you should make the link an indirect one.
and if you do insist on keeping the link, put a HUGE warning on it please.
What worries me is that children all over the world are inevitably going to see this footage. I didn't have to see anything like this until I was over 18.
Another casualty of the French attack - Trump has cancelled his scheduled press conference to announce his VP nomination, which was to be at 11am EDT tomorrow.
Brokenwheel: maybe you should make the link an indirect one.
and if you do insist on keeping the link, put a HUGE warning on it please.
What worries me is that children all over the world are inevitably going to see this footage. I didn't have to see anything like this until I was over 18.
How much longer can France keep taking this punishment? You either go to war or you vote in someone like Le Pen, things are about to get nasty either way.
War with where though? The problem is a stateless concept. Stamping down ISIS seems like the only way to contain matters, for a time, but it'll be back.
Best wishes to all tonight - let harsh words be forgotten in the aftermath.
Here's one thing - suddenly Brexit seems that little bit more sensible. I'll bet there's less Bremorse tomorrow, as people digest this hideous news.
Some expert on BBC News just said France is "playing catch up" in regards to terrorism prevention. But I'd have thought as a member of the EU etc....
Could the reality possibly be that being part of the EU doesn't make a blind bit of difference one way or another to a country's security from terror threats?
I can't sleep. We have had so many happy times in France. We had a lovely cottage in Manse for many years and the locals were always warm, friendly and welcoming. Its my second favourite country in the world. So. More PB.
The answer is: it depends. No government can protect its citizens from the determined lone wolf or small cell. We should remember that we don't even know that it was a Muslim; we're just assuming. That's sad in and of itself.
Schengen just adds to the headaches. In addition to your local threat register, you have to worry about your neighbours' radicals too.
We tend to think about the EU from our perspective. You may think its British exceptionalism, but we have one of the world's great SIGINT agencies (bolstered by UKUSA, excellent intelligence agencies and a well funded, relatively incorruptible police service.
That's not true across the bloc. From an intelligence perspective there are far more consumer countries than producers. The smaller nations gain a great deal from the collective security apparatus of the EU.
The 'successful' attacks seem to be small cells or individuals acting alone. Nothing for spys to see.
One of the goals of PREVENT is to head things off at the pass. Few people move directly from ordinary joe to Jihadi, in the same way that serial killers often start with animal cruelty. Intelligence can help identify that process of radicalisation.
PREVENT has zero support in the Muslim community in Britain BTW.
Fox News is taking the Sky News feed. One of the Sky folks said that 'Promenade des Anglais' meant 'Street of Angels'. Obviously they haven't heard about Brexit yet.
Sky News just said possibility of several hundred dead.
If he went for 2km @ the rate the video showed, that may tragically not be off by too much.
I try to avoid things like the beheading videos and such but I did see the graphic video of the aftermath of this and over that short 50m or so there must have been at least 30 dead, possibly more. The scale of this is hard to really comprehend.
Brokenwheel: maybe you should make the link an indirect one.
and if you do insist on keeping the link, put a HUGE warning on it please.
What worries me is that children all over the world are inevitably going to see this footage. I didn't have to see anything like this until I was over 18.
FWIW, I've seen a lot of dodgy videos of previous attacks, this is by some magnitude the most horrific stuff I've ever seen, had to turn it off almost instantly.
Fox News is taking the Sky News feed. One of the Sky folks said that 'Promenade des Anglais' meant 'Street of Angels'. Obviously they haven't heard about Brexit yet.
??
Geneva has a "Jardin Anglais", and a "Hotel Angleterre".
Another casualty of the French attack - Trump has cancelled his scheduled press conference to announce his VP nomination, which was to be at 11am EDT tomorrow.
Sky News just said possibility of several hundred dead.
If he went for 2km @ the rate the video showed, that may tragically not be off by too much.
I try to avoid things like the beheading videos and such but I did see the graphic video of the aftermath of this and over that short 50m or so there must have been at least 30 dead, possibly more. The scale of this is hard to really comprehend.
30*(2000m/50m)= 1200. That number is obviously very high, lets hope that it's off by a factor of 10 or more.
Brokenwheel: maybe you should make the link an indirect one.
and if you do insist on keeping the link, put a HUGE warning on it please.
What worries me is that children all over the world are inevitably going to see this footage. I didn't have to see anything like this until I was over 18.
Without trying to minimise anything, believe me, these images are quite mild in comparison to what is freely available on the Internet. (horrendous accidents, torture murders, suicides, dismemberment etc)
Brokenwheel: maybe you should make the link an indirect one.
and if you do insist on keeping the link, put a HUGE warning on it please.
What worries me is that children all over the world are inevitably going to see this footage. I didn't have to see anything like this until I was over 18.
Without trying to minimise anything, believe me, these images are quite mild in comparison to what is freely available on the Internet. (horrendous accidents, torture murders, suicides, dismemberment etc)
On the contrary,most other videos are places and scenarios that we can't envisage ourselves being in. This is different.
Sky News just said possibility of several hundred dead.
If he went for 2km @ the rate the video showed, that may tragically not be off by too much.
I try to avoid things like the beheading videos and such but I did see the graphic video of the aftermath of this and over that short 50m or so there must have been at least 30 dead, possibly more. The scale of this is hard to really comprehend.
30*(2000m/50m)= 1200. That number is obviously very high, lets hope that it's off by a factor of 10 or more.
Yeah, you could imagine the casualty rate being higher at the start.
Another casualty of the French attack - Trump has cancelled his scheduled press conference to announce his VP nomination, which was to be at 11am EDT tomorrow.
A German reporter captured the start of the attack, with the truck revving up and then shooting off down the road. Apparently they are showing it on German TV.
Sky News just said possibility of several hundred dead.
If he went for 2km @ the rate the video showed, that may tragically not be off by too much.
I try to avoid things like the beheading videos and such but I did see the graphic video of the aftermath of this and over that short 50m or so there must have been at least 30 dead, possibly more. The scale of this is hard to really comprehend.
30*(2000m/50m)= 1200. That number is obviously very high, lets hope that it's off by a factor of 10 or more.
Yeah, you could imagine the casualty rate being higher at the start.
Ugh, how horrible.
Dreadful eyewitness report saying truck swerved at speed all along the road mowing people down, bodies flying like bowling pins.
'Unless and until Islam decides to Enlighten itself, we have to minimise our exposure to Islam. That means minimal if not zero immigraton from Muslim countries and a series of measures designed to make life very difficult in the West for fundamentalist Muslims - no more sharia, no more Muslim schools, no more imported imams, no more burqas, no more halal slaughter, no more prayer time at work, no more understanding of Muslims cab drivers who won't take guide dogs.'
Spot on ,time to get tough the softly softly crap clearly isn't working.
'Unless and until Islam decides to Enlighten itself, we have to minimise our exposure to Islam. That means minimal if not zero immigraton from Muslim countries and a series of measures designed to make life very difficult in the West for fundamentalist Muslims - no more sharia, no more Muslim schools, no more imported imams, no more burqas, no more halal slaughter, no more prayer time at work, no more understanding of Muslims cab drivers who won't take guide dogs.'
Spot on ,time to get tough the softly softly crap clearly isn't working.
'Unless and until Islam decides to Enlighten itself, we have to minimise our exposure to Islam. That means minimal if not zero immigraton from Muslim countries and a series of measures designed to make life very difficult in the West for fundamentalist Muslims - no more sharia, no more Muslim schools, no more imported imams, no more burqas, no more halal slaughter, no more prayer time at work, no more understanding of Muslims cab drivers who won't take guide dogs.'
Spot on ,time to get tough the softly softly crap clearly isn't working.
The problem is that the Q'ran is far less ambiguous than the Bible and as far as I am aware, it does not have anything with the qualifying effect of the New Testament. I do not see how the fairly explicit calls to war and action within the Q'ran and the calls to kill and the absolution and requirement for jihad can possible be removed from the creed.
The basis for the Reformation was re-interpretation. I don't see how Islam can manage to achieve that.
I remember reading some of Michel Houellebecq's novels and thinking they were a bit OTT but events are turning out to be every bit as horrific as they are in his books.
bloody hell,judging by the footage the BBC has just shown, it was 2km of dense crowds.
I am not sure I can bring myself to watch it. The mental images are bad enough.
I don't intend to watch it again but from memory (I only half watched it through fingers semi-covering the window), there is only one genuinely graphic image of mutilation. I would say that if you are concerned, don't watch, it is quite awful.
bloody hell,judging by the footage the BBC has just shown, it was 2km of dense crowds.
I am not sure I can bring myself to watch it. The mental images are bad enough.
I don't intend to watch it again but from memory (I only half watched it through fingers semi-covering the window), there is only one genuinely graphic image of mutilation. I would say that if you are concerned, don't watch, it is quite awful.
I fess up to watching Human Centipede II on the Horror Channel on Tuesday night - that was rather cringeworthy.
Comments
More or less confirms it is Pence imo, but another couple of days till confirmation.
And I don't see a solution that will actually work
The most frightening, dreadful thing is that it is French people doing this in France. There is an Islamic disease. We cannot beat about the bush here. Unfortunately, Moslems have to accept that only they can find the solution. I wish it were otherwise, but it's not.
IIRC it was her and Hammond who got together and went above George's head to the PM to get real terms protection for the intelligence budgets. It's why May and Osborne never really got on.
http://www.france24.com/en/livefeed
Thank you to our security services for keeping us safe, and thank Allah we have May as PM.
France: algeria
UK: pakistan, bangladesh
Germany: Turkey. (more recently syria, iraq, afghanistan)
I'm still going.
Fuck these twats.
http://us.cnn.com/2016/07/14/health/boredom-extreme-politics/index.html
Five prediction methods outlined:
* model from Moody's Analytics
* Norpoth's model based on primary performance
* Names ending in "n"
* First-time Olympic holder
* Allan Lichtman's questionnaire
Sadly, I think the idea that there are many more than 70 dead is likely to be accurate, it was a huge crowd.
RIP mes amis
But if it's several hundred dead that would make it the deadliest terror attack EVER in Europe.
Ugh, how horrible.
I do hope Theresa May takes charge of the UK's response as the alternative would be a great concern.
'Unless and until Islam decides to Enlighten itself, we have to minimise our exposure to Islam. That means minimal if not zero immigraton from Muslim countries and a series of measures designed to make life very difficult in the West for fundamentalist Muslims - no more sharia, no more Muslim schools, no more imported imams, no more burqas, no more halal slaughter, no more prayer time at work, no more understanding of Muslims cab drivers who won't take guide dogs.'
Spot on ,time to get tough the softly softly crap clearly isn't working.
The basis for the Reformation was re-interpretation. I don't see how Islam can manage to achieve that.