Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Undefined discussion subject.

123468

Comments

  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,410

    RobD said:

    Moses_ said:

    Don't write her off yet...

    Sky News
    Dugdale fails to win constituency seat but may still be elected on regional list

    It really ought not to be possible for people to stand for both the regional list and an individual constituency. Make a choice - and live with the democratic result.
    Isn't that what Leanne did?
    Very possibly - but that doesn't make it right.
    No, I was wondering if Leanna only stood in the constituency.

    Checked wiki, and she stood on both.
  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    Torfaen - Lab hold. 20% majority

    Cardiff South - Lab hold. 22% majority
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,365
    Arf Just seen where Eastwood is on an electoral map.

    Must have been a while since Glasgow was more Tory than Labour :p
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    I see the "Abolish the Welsh Assembly Party" as 3.9% of the list vote. Not enough to get a list seat I suppose?

  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,365
    MikeL said:

    Digest this figure:

    Lab is on 33% in WALES!

    WALES!

    Lab has no bigger heartland anywhere in the UK than Wales.

    And they are on 33%. Breathtaking.

    Keir Hardie must be spinning !
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,410

    I see the "Abolish the Welsh Assembly Party" as 3.9% of the list vote. Not enough to get a list seat I suppose?

    Very appropriate ;)
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,410
    Are we going to get an equivalent national share?
  • SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    Morning all.

    FPT - What a cracking photo of OGH’s grandfather on the stumps.
  • JohnLoonyJohnLoony Posts: 1,790

    I see the "Abolish the Welsh Assembly Party" as 3.9% of the list vote. Not enough to get a list seat I suppose?

    No. There are only 12 seats in each region, so the threshold for winning a seat is about 7% (the actual amount depends on the constituency seats and the vote split, because there are not enough top-up seats to make it properly proportional).

  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,365
    RobD said:

    Are we going to get an equivalent national share?

    I do hope solar
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,410
    Looks like the BBC broadcast is about to end :(

    Is Sky still running theirs?
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    An ironic sidenote: it's possible Corbyn's "prediction" that Labour will not lose seats in England might come true. Overall. The prediction he had to laboriously retract.

    Well they already have lost seats - not yet near three figures - but they have still lost them. The first opposition to do so in 3 decades.

    They might win lots and lots in the counts later this morning - but it is looking unlikely
    Unlikely - but not impossible.

    This is good as we really want Corbyn in situ.


    The significant retreat in vote share in Wales and Scotland is going to hamper any possibility of Labour progress.

    But Corbyn doesn't really see anything outside of his Islington blinkers

    I agree that he is safe - for now.

    It is a bad night for Labour - just not bad enough to encourage a challenge.
    Yes, it's very difficult for Labour to come back in Westminster without a significant recovery in Scotland. But it's hard to see that happening before 2025. And maybe never, with the SNP now entrenched as the centre left party north of the border.

    The one grain of hope for Labour is the first signs of Nat decline at Holyrood. This win for Sturgeon feels a bit like Blair in 2005. The wheels will come off the SNP bus, probably in this parliament. Nothing is forever.
    Though if SLAB gets closer to extinction and the SNP becomes a devolutionist rather than seperatist party then a formal Westminster pact may well be more viable.
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,773
    RobD said:

    Are we going to get an equivalent national share?

    Vs 2015, it's Con -3, Lab +3 so overall just about a tie (Con won GE by 6.5%)

    But that's based on England only.

    (As BBC local key wards analysis is England only).
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,773
    Laura's overall "message" is more pro Con than an hour ago.

    Emphasising "status quo" - with a potential big Con plus in Scotland.
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    JohnLoony said:

    I see the "Abolish the Welsh Assembly Party" as 3.9% of the list vote. Not enough to get a list seat I suppose?

    No. There are only 12 seats in each region, so the threshold for winning a seat is about 7% (the actual amount depends on the constituency seats and the vote split, because there are not enough top-up seats to make it properly proportional).

    So how many assembly top up seats will the kippers get?
  • oxfordsimonoxfordsimon Posts: 5,845
    MikeL said:

    RobD said:

    Are we going to get an equivalent national share?

    Vs 2015, it's Con -3, Lab +3 so overall just about a tie (Con won GE by 6.5%)

    But that's based on England only.

    (As BBC local key wards analysis is England only).
    And I suspect they have chosen that way of presenting the figures very carefully.

    The BBC are looking as hard as they can to find ways of making this a bad night for the Tories.
  • fitalassfitalass Posts: 4,335
    Delighted to just hear that Annie Wells has just become the Scottish Conservatives 2nd MSP on Glasgow list. We now have as many Glasgow MSPs as we have Pandas in Edinburgh! :)
  • Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    Two Tories elected on the Glasgow list (4 Lab, only 1 Green).

    BBC Parliament has the Scottish coverage.
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,773

    MikeL said:

    RobD said:

    Are we going to get an equivalent national share?

    Vs 2015, it's Con -3, Lab +3 so overall just about a tie (Con won GE by 6.5%)

    But that's based on England only.

    (As BBC local key wards analysis is England only).
    And I suspect they have chosen that way of presenting the figures very carefully.

    The BBC are looking as hard as they can to find ways of making this a bad night for the Tories.
    No.

    They also said (with equal prominence) that it's Lab -4, Con 0 vs 2012.
  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    Glasgow list seats

    4 Lab
    2 Con
    1 Green
  • oxfordsimonoxfordsimon Posts: 5,845

    MikeL said:

    RobD said:

    Are we going to get an equivalent national share?

    Vs 2015, it's Con -3, Lab +3 so overall just about a tie (Con won GE by 6.5%)

    But that's based on England only.

    (As BBC local key wards analysis is England only).
    And I suspect they have chosen that way of presenting the figures very carefully.

    The BBC are looking as hard as they can to find ways of making this a bad night for the Tories.
    Just caught up with the Labour talking points that were revealed on air by Laura K. And the official Labour line was to do a comparison with 2015 rather than 2012. She made the point that the only accurate measure was to compare like with like.

    And what are the BBC doing? Following the Labour line.
  • ArtistArtist Posts: 1,893
    Still waiting for key Welsh seats Vale of Glamorgan, Cardiff Central and Cardiff North.
  • oxfordsimonoxfordsimon Posts: 5,845
    MikeL said:

    MikeL said:

    RobD said:

    Are we going to get an equivalent national share?

    Vs 2015, it's Con -3, Lab +3 so overall just about a tie (Con won GE by 6.5%)

    But that's based on England only.

    (As BBC local key wards analysis is England only).
    And I suspect they have chosen that way of presenting the figures very carefully.

    The BBC are looking as hard as they can to find ways of making this a bad night for the Tories.
    No.

    They also said (with equal prominence) that it's Lab -4, Con 0 vs 2012.
    But the BBC political editor said earlier in the evening that the 2015 comparison was bogus - yet they are leading with it.
  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    edited May 2016
    Therefore elected

    Anas Sarwar
    Johan Lamont
    James Kelly
    Pauline McNeill

    Adam Tompkins
    Annie Wells

    Partick Harvey

  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 40,040
    edited May 2016
    Looks like there'll be plenty for the Stupid party's useful idiots to latch onto from the results. So Corbyn will remain in place to lead them to catastrophe in 2020.
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,773
    edited May 2016

    MikeL said:

    MikeL said:

    RobD said:

    Are we going to get an equivalent national share?

    Vs 2015, it's Con -3, Lab +3 so overall just about a tie (Con won GE by 6.5%)

    But that's based on England only.

    (As BBC local key wards analysis is England only).
    And I suspect they have chosen that way of presenting the figures very carefully.

    The BBC are looking as hard as they can to find ways of making this a bad night for the Tories.
    No.

    They also said (with equal prominence) that it's Lab -4, Con 0 vs 2012.
    But the BBC political editor said earlier in the evening that the 2015 comparison was bogus - yet they are leading with it.
    No - they gave both.

    I'm a Con supporter and I'm bored stiff of the anti BBC spin.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,410

    Two Tories elected on the Glasgow list (4 Lab, only 1 Green).

    BBC Parliament has the Scottish coverage.

    How long has this show been going on for? Would have switched over hours ago!
    Do enjoy watching Hosie too, and I spy him on the panel.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,365
    edited May 2016

    Therefore elected

    Anas Sarwar
    Johan Lamont
    James Kelly
    Pauline McNeill

    Labour will do themselves no favours by sticking that bunch of proven losers in through the backdoor. Ruth OTOH has done herself a huge turn by WINNING properly.
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    Looks like there'll be plenty gor the Stupid party's useful idiots to latch onto from the results. So Corbyn will remain in place to lead them to catastrophe in 2020.

    From tonights results it looks as if Corbyn will not win in 2020 (though who knows what might happen in a Tory Inner vs Outer bloodbath) but hardly a catastrophe, and its hard to imagine a campaign going any worse than last weeks Nazier than you news.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 38,659

    MikeL said:

    RobD said:

    Are we going to get an equivalent national share?

    Vs 2015, it's Con -3, Lab +3 so overall just about a tie (Con won GE by 6.5%)

    But that's based on England only.

    (As BBC local key wards analysis is England only).
    And I suspect they have chosen that way of presenting the figures very carefully.

    The BBC are looking as hard as they can to find ways of making this a bad night for the Tories.
    Just caught up with the Labour talking points that were revealed on air by Laura K. And the official Labour line was to do a comparison with 2015 rather than 2012. She made the point that the only accurate measure was to compare like with like.

    And what are the BBC doing? Following the Labour line.
    A 3% swing, compared to 2015, implies a Conservative lead of 3.5% in England. Add in the Scottish and Welsh results, and the Conservatives would be about 3% ahead in Great Britain.
  • oxfordsimonoxfordsimon Posts: 5,845
    MikeL said:

    MikeL said:

    MikeL said:

    RobD said:

    Are we going to get an equivalent national share?

    Vs 2015, it's Con -3, Lab +3 so overall just about a tie (Con won GE by 6.5%)

    But that's based on England only.

    (As BBC local key wards analysis is England only).
    And I suspect they have chosen that way of presenting the figures very carefully.

    The BBC are looking as hard as they can to find ways of making this a bad night for the Tories.
    No.

    They also said (with equal prominence) that it's Lab -4, Con 0 vs 2012.
    But the BBC political editor said earlier in the evening that the 2015 comparison was bogus - yet they are leading with it.
    No - they gave both.

    I'm a Con supporter and I'm bored stiff of the anti BBC spin.
    They gave both - but with the 2015 comparision (which their own Political Editor said was bogus) first.

    Why give any coverage to a comparison that you have said is inappropriate?

    Someone made that decision. And it undermines their own Political Editor.

    I am pro-BBC - but very anti-BBC journalism.
  • JohnLoonyJohnLoony Posts: 1,790

    JohnLoony said:

    I see the "Abolish the Welsh Assembly Party" as 3.9% of the list vote. Not enough to get a list seat I suppose?

    No. There are only 12 seats in each region, so the threshold for winning a seat is about 7% (the actual amount depends on the constituency seats and the vote split, because there are not enough top-up seats to make it properly proportional).

    So how many assembly top up seats will the kippers get?
    Probably 1 or 2 in each region, depending on how they are spread or split.

  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    MSP elected from Lothian list

    Miles Briggs (Con)
    Alison Johnstone (Greens)
    Kezia Dugdale (Lab)
    Gordon Lindhurst (Con)
    Neil Findlay (Lab)
    Jeremy Balfour (Con)
    Andy Wightman (Green)
  • Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    Lothian list

    3 Con, 2 Lab, 2 Grn

    6-4-3-2-1 overall inc constituencies
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,410
    Lothian:
    3 CON
    2 GRN
    2 LAB
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,773
    edited May 2016

    MikeL said:

    MikeL said:

    MikeL said:

    RobD said:

    Are we going to get an equivalent national share?

    Vs 2015, it's Con -3, Lab +3 so overall just about a tie (Con won GE by 6.5%)

    But that's based on England only.

    (As BBC local key wards analysis is England only).
    And I suspect they have chosen that way of presenting the figures very carefully.

    The BBC are looking as hard as they can to find ways of making this a bad night for the Tories.
    No.

    They also said (with equal prominence) that it's Lab -4, Con 0 vs 2012.
    But the BBC political editor said earlier in the evening that the 2015 comparison was bogus - yet they are leading with it.
    No - they gave both.

    I'm a Con supporter and I'm bored stiff of the anti BBC spin.
    They gave both - but with the 2015 comparision (which their own Political Editor said was bogus) first.

    Why give any coverage to a comparison that you have said is inappropriate?

    Someone made that decision. And it undermines their own Political Editor.

    I am pro-BBC - but very anti-BBC journalism.
    Disagree.

    Sorry - can't be bothered with any more partisan knockabout - total waste of time.
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    SeanT said:

    Sean_F said:

    MikeL said:

    RobD said:

    Are we going to get an equivalent national share?

    Vs 2015, it's Con -3, Lab +3 so overall just about a tie (Con won GE by 6.5%)

    But that's based on England only.

    (As BBC local key wards analysis is England only).
    And I suspect they have chosen that way of presenting the figures very carefully.

    The BBC are looking as hard as they can to find ways of making this a bad night for the Tories.
    Just caught up with the Labour talking points that were revealed on air by Laura K. And the official Labour line was to do a comparison with 2015 rather than 2012. She made the point that the only accurate measure was to compare like with like.

    And what are the BBC doing? Following the Labour line.
    A 3% swing, compared to 2015, implies a Conservative lead of 3.5% in England. Add in the Scottish and Welsh results, and the Conservatives would be about 3% ahead in Great Britain.
    Which is, of course, pretty much what the polls are saying. A good night for them.
    Not much sign of an anti-Cameron backlash on these results.
  • Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    edited May 2016
    Mid Scotland & Fife

    4 CON
    2 LAB
    1 GRN

    (8 SNP & 1 LD in the constituencies)
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    The Tories aren't going to beat Labour on the constituency section.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/2016/scotland/results
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 40,040

    Looks like there'll be plenty gor the Stupid party's useful idiots to latch onto from the results. So Corbyn will remain in place to lead them to catastrophe in 2020.

    From tonights results it looks as if Corbyn will not win in 2020 (though who knows what might happen in a Tory Inner vs Outer bloodbath) but hardly a catastrophe, and its hard to imagine a campaign going any worse than last weeks Nazier than you news.

    Labour will be hammered in 2020. The anti-Semitism stuff has only just begun. The Stupid party's leadership has spent decades cosying up to Jew-haters and baiters, that can't be expunged. And we've still got all the other associations and anti-western positions to drip out, plus the abandonment of Trident to work through. Let's also remember this inept government has hardly been setting the world on fire. The headlines for the Tories haven't been exactly wonderful.

  • PongPong Posts: 4,693

    Looks like there'll be plenty for the Stupid party's useful idiots to latch onto from the results. So Corbyn will remain in place to lead them to catastrophe in 2020.

    It's looks to me like Sadiq Khan could well end up as leader of the sane wing of the labour party in the medium/long term.

    40/1 to replace Corbyn....
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,410
    I can only assume the SNP will be picking up some list seats somewhere :D
  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    Mid Scotland and Fife list seats


    4 Conservative
    2 Labour
    1 Green
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    RobD said:

    I can only assume the SNP will be picking up some list seats somewhere :D

    It's going to be very close as to whether they win a majority.
  • oxfordsimonoxfordsimon Posts: 5,845
    Pong said:

    Looks like there'll be plenty for the Stupid party's useful idiots to latch onto from the results. So Corbyn will remain in place to lead them to catastrophe in 2020.

    It's looks to me like Sadiq Khan could well end up as leader of the sane wing of the labour party in the medium/long term.

    40/1 to replace Corbyn....
    He can only be a candidate if he is an MP. And that seems unlikely.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,410
    AndyJS said:

    The Tories aren't going to beat Labour on the constituency section.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/2016/scotland/results

    Doing a tiny bit better on the list though ;)
  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    Vale of Glamorgan - Lab hold.

    Jane Hutt survives again
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 40,040
    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    Sean_F said:

    MikeL said:

    RobD said:

    Are we going to get an equivalent national share?

    Vs 2015, it's Con -3, Lab +3 so overall just about a tie (Con won GE by 6.5%)

    But that's based on England only.

    (As BBC local key wards analysis is England only).
    And I suspect they have chosen that way of presenting the figures very carefully.

    The BBC are looking as hard as they can to find ways of making this a bad night for the Tories.
    Just caught up with the Labour talking points that were revealed on air by Laura K. And the official Labour line was to do a comparison with 2015 rather than 2012. She made the point that the only accurate measure was to compare like with like.

    And what are the BBC doing? Following the Labour line.
    A 3% swing, compared to 2015, implies a Conservative lead of 3.5% in England. Add in the Scottish and Welsh results, and the Conservatives would be about 3% ahead in Great Britain.
    Which is, of course, pretty much what the polls are saying. A good night for them.
    Not much sign of an anti-Cameron backlash on these results.
    Indeed not. The worry for Cameron, on an otherwise pretty satisfactory night, is the fact the polls are proving accurate, as I just mentioned. That implies the EU vote really IS very tight.

    The phone and online polls can't both be right, though. It's only tight if the online polls are correct.

  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    edited May 2016
    Claire Baker and Alex Rowley are the 2 Labour survivors from Mid Scotland & Fife list

    Murdo Fraser Liz Smith Dean Lockhart Alexander Stewart are the Tory MSPs

    and Mark Russell is elected for the Greens
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    Best possible night for Cameron. Corbyn slightly weakened but nothing more.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    edited May 2016
    Breaking News:

    John Curtice says SNP at risk of failing to secure an overall majority.

    In that case there's no chance of a referendum.
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,773
    edited May 2016
    Curtice:

    - SNP may not get majority
    - Con comfortably second
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,410
    AndyJS said:

    Best possible night for Cameron. Corbyn slightly weakened but nothing more.

    Tactical Tory voters sitting on their hands :D
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    AndyJS said:

    Breaking News:

    John Curtice says SNP at risk of failing to secure an overall majority.

    In that case there's no chance of a referendum.

    *cough*
  • Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    By my [hasty!] calcs, Labour were next in line in all three regions so far. i.e. if there had been one more list seat awarded in each region, they would have got it.

    Heart of stone etc.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,410

    AndyJS said:

    Breaking News:

    John Curtice says SNP at risk of failing to secure an overall majority.

    In that case there's no chance of a referendum.

    *cough*
    Care for a lozenge? :p
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,773
    AndyJS said:

    Breaking News:

    John Curtice says SNP at risk of failing to secure an overall majority.

    In that case there's no chance of a referendum.

    What about the Greens?

    Would they support another referendum?
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,365
    Dair will be cockahoop. This looks like an SNP minority with the greens effectively holding the c&S I reckon.
    Also annoyed at my Scottish punting :p

    Meeks NOM going to come in it seems
  • chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341
    edited May 2016

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    Sean_F said:

    MikeL said:

    RobD said:

    Are we going to get an equivalent national share?

    Vs 2015, it's Con -3, Lab +3 so overall just about a tie (Con won GE by 6.5%)

    But that's based on England only.

    (As BBC local key wards analysis is England only).
    And I suspect they have chosen that way of presenting the figures very carefully.

    The BBC are looking as hard as they can to find ways of making this a bad night for the Tories.
    Just caught up with the Labour talking points that were revealed on air by Laura K. And the official Labour line was to do a comparison with 2015 rather than 2012. She made the point that the only accurate measure was to compare like with like.

    And what are the BBC doing? Following the Labour line.
    A 3% swing, compared to 2015, implies a Conservative lead of 3.5% in England. Add in the Scottish and Welsh results, and the Conservatives would be about 3% ahead in Great Britain.
    Which is, of course, pretty much what the polls are saying. A good night for them.
    Not much sign of an anti-Cameron backlash on these results.
    Indeed not. The worry for Cameron, on an otherwise pretty satisfactory night, is the fact the polls are proving accurate, as I just mentioned. That implies the EU vote really IS very tight.

    The phone and online polls can't both be right, though. It's only tight if the online polls are correct.

    Is Ipsos' Scotland polling by telephone?

    If so, SNP 51 Lab 19 Con 18 LD 6

    Result (with two left is) is SNP 47 Lab 23 Con 21 LD 7

  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    AndyJS said:

    Breaking News:

    John Curtice says SNP at risk of failing to secure an overall majority.

    In that case there's no chance of a referendum.

    What if SNP + Greens = majority? Greens are pro-referendum too aren't they?
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,410

    By my [hasty!] calcs, Labour were next in line in all three regions so far. i.e. if there had been one more list seat awarded in each region, they would have got it.

    Heart of stone etc.

    Although I don't feel too bad enjoying Labour's defeat.. I do feel bad for the individuals involved. Must suck for Dugdale to be the only leader not to be elected in a constituency, for instance.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,365

    AndyJS said:

    Breaking News:

    John Curtice says SNP at risk of failing to secure an overall majority.

    In that case there's no chance of a referendum.

    *cough*
    You're going to have a substantial lead on the tip board when I update.I gave it a miss too ><
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    Pong said:

    Looks like there'll be plenty for the Stupid party's useful idiots to latch onto from the results. So Corbyn will remain in place to lead them to catastrophe in 2020.

    It's looks to me like Sadiq Khan could well end up as leader of the sane wing of the labour party in the medium/long term.

    40/1 to replace Corbyn....
    Sadie Khan's big problem is that you have to be in Parliament to be Labour leader. Unless there's a coup immediately, he won't be.
  • FenmanFenman Posts: 1,047
    Another pathetic result for the Lib Dems in Cambridge. Poor policies, poor campaigning, poor candidates. All those new members; same tired faces on the ballot paper
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,365

    AndyJS said:

    Breaking News:

    John Curtice says SNP at risk of failing to secure an overall majority.

    In that case there's no chance of a referendum.

    What if SNP + Greens = majority? Greens are pro-referendum too aren't they?
    I think this will be the result. Which means the Scottish government will be even further left
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 40,040

    Pong said:

    Looks like there'll be plenty for the Stupid party's useful idiots to latch onto from the results. So Corbyn will remain in place to lead them to catastrophe in 2020.

    It's looks to me like Sadiq Khan could well end up as leader of the sane wing of the labour party in the medium/long term.

    40/1 to replace Corbyn....
    Sadie Khan's big problem is that you have to be in Parliament to be Labour leader. Unless there's a coup immediately, he won't be.

    There'll be no coup. Labour members like to lose with Jezza and the hard left.

  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,410
    Pulpstar said:

    AndyJS said:

    Breaking News:

    John Curtice says SNP at risk of failing to secure an overall majority.

    In that case there's no chance of a referendum.

    What if SNP + Greens = majority? Greens are pro-referendum too aren't they?
    I think this will be the result. Which means the Scottish government will be even further left
    Excellent news for the Tories.... in my wild imagination :D
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    Pong said:

    Looks like there'll be plenty for the Stupid party's useful idiots to latch onto from the results. So Corbyn will remain in place to lead them to catastrophe in 2020.

    It's looks to me like Sadiq Khan could well end up as leader of the sane wing of the labour party in the medium/long term.

    40/1 to replace Corbyn....
    Sadie Khan's big problem is that you have to be in Parliament to be Labour leader. Unless there's a coup immediately, he won't be.
    He could decide he's not resigning from Parliament afterall couldn't he? There's nothing automatic in the process.
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    Sean_F said:

    MikeL said:

    RobD said:

    Are we going to get an equivalent national share?

    Vs 2015, it's Con -3, Lab +3 so overall just about a tie (Con won GE by 6.5%)

    But that's based on England only.

    (As BBC local key wards analysis is England only).
    And I suspect they have chosen that way of presenting the figures very carefully.

    The BBC are looking as hard as they can to find ways of making this a bad night for the Tories.
    Just caught up with the Labour talking points that were revealed on air by Laura K. And the official Labour line was to do a comparison with 2015 rather than 2012. She made the point that the only accurate measure was to compare like with like.

    And what are the BBC doing? Following the Labour line.
    A 3% swing, compared to 2015, implies a Conservative lead of 3.5% in England. Add in the Scottish and Welsh results, and the Conservatives would be about 3% ahead in Great Britain.
    Which is, of course, pretty much what the polls are saying. A good night for them.
    Not much sign of an anti-Cameron backlash on these results.
    Indeed not. The worry for Cameron, on an otherwise pretty satisfactory night, is the fact the polls are proving accurate, as I just mentioned. That implies the EU vote really IS very tight.
    Predictions are always being talked up as tight. It is in the interest of both factions to motivate their voters and for the media a two horse race is more interesting. I am not convinced though.

  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 43,507
    RobD said:

    Moses_ said:

    Don't write her off yet...

    Sky News
    Dugdale fails to win constituency seat but may still be elected on regional list

    It really ought not to be possible for people to stand for both the regional list and an individual constituency. Make a choice - and live with the democratic result.
    Isn't that what Leanne did?
    and, er, Ruth Davidson.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395

    AndyJS said:

    Breaking News:

    John Curtice says SNP at risk of failing to secure an overall majority.

    In that case there's no chance of a referendum.

    What if SNP + Greens = majority? Greens are pro-referendum too aren't they?
    Good point.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    Pulpstar said:

    AndyJS said:

    Breaking News:

    John Curtice says SNP at risk of failing to secure an overall majority.

    In that case there's no chance of a referendum.

    *cough*
    You're going to have a substantial lead on the tip board when I update.I gave it a miss too ><</p>
    It may not come home but it was a value bet.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,410

    Pong said:

    Looks like there'll be plenty for the Stupid party's useful idiots to latch onto from the results. So Corbyn will remain in place to lead them to catastrophe in 2020.

    It's looks to me like Sadiq Khan could well end up as leader of the sane wing of the labour party in the medium/long term.

    40/1 to replace Corbyn....
    Sadie Khan's big problem is that you have to be in Parliament to be Labour leader. Unless there's a coup immediately, he won't be.
    He could decide he's not resigning from Parliament afterall couldn't he? There's nothing automatic in the process.
    Wouldn't be a great way of starting your term as Mayor would it, breaking a promise to stand down as MP. I also find it hard to imagine he could simultaneously be party leader while being Mayor? Unless he resigns from being Mayor, I guess...
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,410

    RobD said:

    Moses_ said:

    Don't write her off yet...

    Sky News
    Dugdale fails to win constituency seat but may still be elected on regional list

    It really ought not to be possible for people to stand for both the regional list and an individual constituency. Make a choice - and live with the democratic result.
    Isn't that what Leanne did?
    and, er, Ruth Davidson.
    Yep.... one of the reasons I prefer good old FPTP ;)

    I think you're the first SNP supporter to join us today, what are your thoughts?
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,365

    Pulpstar said:

    AndyJS said:

    Breaking News:

    John Curtice says SNP at risk of failing to secure an overall majority.

    In that case there's no chance of a referendum.

    *cough*
    You're going to have a substantial lead on the tip board when I update.I gave it a miss too ><</p>
    It may not come home but it was a value bet.
    I think it will. SN P on 64 I think
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 43,507

    AndyJS said:

    Breaking News:

    John Curtice says SNP at risk of failing to secure an overall majority.

    In that case there's no chance of a referendum.

    What if SNP + Greens = majority? Greens are pro-referendum too aren't they?
    Sort of. They say that the requirement should be a million signatures on a petition, unless there's an even larger petition against.
  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    edited May 2016
    Preseli Prembrokeshire - Con hold. 14% majority
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    AndyJS said:

    Breaking News:

    John Curtice says SNP at risk of failing to secure an overall majority.

    In that case there's no chance of a referendum.

    *cough*
    Good tip that.
  • No_Offence_AlanNo_Offence_Alan Posts: 5,032
    RobD said:

    I can only assume the SNP will be picking up some list seats somewhere :D

    South Scotland, certainly. Possibly Highlands and islands too.

  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 40,040
    The Greens are Indy with strings attached, aren't they? The currency is a big issue for them, I think.
  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    Cardiff Central declaration
  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    edited May 2016
    Labour hold in Cardiff Central. 3% majority
  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    The returning officer in Cardiff can't read
  • blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492
    A couple of observations re the Conservatives.

    I've always liked Zac Goldsmith but I'm amazed he stooped so low in his campaign, it seems to me that his heart wasn't really in it looking at the silly staged photo of him with a pint. He's finished which is a shame.

    Congratulations to Ruth Davidson, an extraordinary achievement. Standing in a safe seat is child's play, swimming upstream as she has done is challenging and she has proved her worth, the type of politician I would support.
  • PongPong Posts: 4,693

    Pong said:

    Looks like there'll be plenty for the Stupid party's useful idiots to latch onto from the results. So Corbyn will remain in place to lead them to catastrophe in 2020.

    It's looks to me like Sadiq Khan could well end up as leader of the sane wing of the labour party in the medium/long term.

    40/1 to replace Corbyn....
    Sadie Khan's big problem is that you have to be in Parliament to be Labour leader. Unless there's a coup immediately, he won't be.
    He could decide he's not resigning from Parliament afterall couldn't he? There's nothing automatic in the process.
    Absolutely. From what I've googled, he seems to have been intentionally ambiguous about his plans re; tooting.

    It's also worth noting that his majority is small and a b/e could be a bit risky for lab.
  • SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    NOM( If it happens) in Scotland is huge..
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,410
    SeanT said:

    A couple of observations re the Conservatives.

    I've always liked Zac Goldsmith but I'm amazed he stooped so low in his campaign, it seems to me that his heart wasn't really in it looking at the silly staged photo of him with a pint. He's finished which is a shame.

    Congratulations to Ruth Davidson, an extraordinary achievement. Standing in a safe seat is child's play, swimming upstream as she has done is challenging and she has proved her worth, the type of politician I would support.

    Davidson is a potential Tory leader in London, if she ever wants the gig. Naturally gifted politician.
    I really hope she isn't poached. Scotland (or Wales for that matter), shouldn't be some sort of gestation pod where politicians are developed, only to be removed once they actually achieve something.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    Sky News projecting SNP Majority of 7.
  • blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492
    SeanT said:

    A couple of observations re the Conservatives.

    I've always liked Zac Goldsmith but I'm amazed he stooped so low in his campaign, it seems to me that his heart wasn't really in it looking at the silly staged photo of him with a pint. He's finished which is a shame.

    Congratulations to Ruth Davidson, an extraordinary achievement. Standing in a safe seat is child's play, swimming upstream as she has done is challenging and she has proved her worth, the type of politician I would support.

    Davidson is a potential Tory leader in London, if she ever wants the gig. Naturally gifted politician.
    Pedantic but I don't believe politicians are gifted, the good ones get there through sheer hard graft, that's what she's done.

    She's a welcome change from the sharp suited college autocue readers we're stuck with.

    Next Tory leader?
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 62,706
    So Corbyn saying Labour wouldn't lose any seats wasn't far off, was he?

    Easily a good enough result for him to remain as leader.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 62,706
    AndyJS said:

    Breaking News:

    John Curtice says SNP at risk of failing to secure an overall majority.

    In that case there's no chance of a referendum.

    The Greens support independence.

    Very impressive result for the Scottish Tories. Much better than I thought.
  • fitalassfitalass Posts: 4,335

    AndyJS said:

    Breaking News:

    John Curtice says SNP at risk of failing to secure an overall majority.

    In that case there's no chance of a referendum.

    What if SNP + Greens = majority? Greens are pro-referendum too aren't they?
    Just listening to Patrick Harvey on STV making his less than disguised pitch to SNP, surely Ruth Davidson couldn't get that lucky.....
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    SeanT said:

    RobD said:

    SeanT said:

    A couple of observations re the Conservatives.

    I've always liked Zac Goldsmith but I'm amazed he stooped so low in his campaign, it seems to me that his heart wasn't really in it looking at the silly staged photo of him with a pint. He's finished which is a shame.

    Congratulations to Ruth Davidson, an extraordinary achievement. Standing in a safe seat is child's play, swimming upstream as she has done is challenging and she has proved her worth, the type of politician I would support.

    Davidson is a potential Tory leader in London, if she ever wants the gig. Naturally gifted politician.
    I really hope she isn't poached. Scotland (or Wales for that matter), shouldn't be some sort of gestation pod where politicians are developed, only to be removed once they actually achieve something.
    I think she's said she'd never take the job in London. But given the opportunity to play on a much bigger stage...
    Be dangerous territory for any UK-wide party to have a Scot as leader while the SNP are so strong as a Yes vote in a second referendum would defenestrate that leader.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,365

    Sky News projecting SNP Majority of 7.

    No chance lol
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,410



    Very impressive result for the Scottish Tories. Much better than I thought.

    There are literally dozens of them :D
  • fitalassfitalass Posts: 4,335
    SeanT said:

    RobD said:

    SeanT said:

    A couple of observations re the Conservatives.

    I've always liked Zac Goldsmith but I'm amazed he stooped so low in his campaign, it seems to me that his heart wasn't really in it looking at the silly staged photo of him with a pint. He's finished which is a shame.

    Congratulations to Ruth Davidson, an extraordinary achievement. Standing in a safe seat is child's play, swimming upstream as she has done is challenging and she has proved her worth, the type of politician I would support.

    Davidson is a potential Tory leader in London, if she ever wants the gig. Naturally gifted politician.
    I really hope she isn't poached. Scotland (or Wales for that matter), shouldn't be some sort of gestation pod where politicians are developed, only to be removed once they actually achieve something.
    I think she's said she'd never take the job in London. But given the opportunity to play on a much bigger stage...
    Seant, Ruth has again made it clear that she won't leave Scottish politics.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 43,507
    edited May 2016
    RobD said:


    Yep.... one of the reasons I prefer good old FPTP ;)

    I think you're the first SNP supporter to join us today, what are your thoughts?

    Some of us were at the electoral coalface, the glamour of which wears off pretty quickly.

    Disappointing that the SNP looks like not getting a majority, though in a George Best 'where did it all go wrong' kinda way. Good that Andy Wightman got a list place, he'd be an asset to any parliament.

    Longer term it looks like Unionism is coalescing around centre right Toryism, and Indy round centre left 'progressiveness' which clarifies things. That leaves an ever more restricted space for SLab to live in. I expect they'll do yet another reverse ferret on the policies that helped them lose their latest test and end up further confusing themselves and voters.

    Fingers crossed for Coburn.
  • felixfelix Posts: 15,180

    AndyJS said:

    Breaking News:

    John Curtice says SNP at risk of failing to secure an overall majority.

    In that case there's no chance of a referendum.

    The Greens support independence.

    Very impressive result for the Scottish Tories. Much better than I thought.
    Agreed - I feel for Malc G and the other Scottish dampers :)
  • Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    SeanT said:

    RobD said:

    SeanT said:

    A couple of observations re the Conservatives.

    I've always liked Zac Goldsmith but I'm amazed he stooped so low in his campaign, it seems to me that his heart wasn't really in it looking at the silly staged photo of him with a pint. He's finished which is a shame.

    Congratulations to Ruth Davidson, an extraordinary achievement. Standing in a safe seat is child's play, swimming upstream as she has done is challenging and she has proved her worth, the type of politician I would support.

    Davidson is a potential Tory leader in London, if she ever wants the gig. Naturally gifted politician.
    I really hope she isn't poached. Scotland (or Wales for that matter), shouldn't be some sort of gestation pod where politicians are developed, only to be removed once they actually achieve something.
    I think she's said she'd never take the job in London. But given the opportunity to play on a much bigger stage...
    Ruth doing well is good news for Stephen Crabb, both through a process of osmosis and also because she'd very probably campaign for him.
This discussion has been closed.