A Johnson 2022 exit is now the betting favourite – politicalbetting.com
The big problem the PM and his team have this afternoon is that yesterday’s by-elections were worse for the party than expectations. Inevitably the focus is on whether Johnson can survive.
The years before the English Civil War were uncannily like this
The King does some provocative thing
Parliament reacts by being even more provocative
The King returns fire with something outrageous
Parliament is unfazed and does something REALLY outrageous
The King goes crazy
Parliament howls at the moon
And thus in a few short years England fell from normal, fairly calm Christian European country to brutal civil war, tens of thousands dead, and a king with his head in a basket
At each stage English people must have thought: Well this is bonkers, but surely it stops now. It did not
The years before the English Civil War were uncannily like this
The King does some provocative thing
Parliament reacts by being even more provocative
The King returns fire with something outrageous
Parliament is unfazed and does something REALLY outrageous
The King goes crazy
Parliament howls at the moon
And thus in a few short years England fell from normal, fairly calm Christian European country to brutal civil war, tens of thousands dead, and a king with his head in a basket
At each stage English people must have thought: Well this is bonkers, but surely it stops now. It did not
It all went wrong when we tried to take back control from our unelected rulers.
I guess we can now expect some rightwing loon like Patel to announce that this reform in America is just what we need here.
No, she won’t. Abortion, thankfully, remains unpoliticised in the UK. It will remain so
And besides, if ever a move against abortion did come, it would come from Roman Catholics, who are just as likely to be found on the Left or in the Libs as in the Tory party
I've never quite understood why there is basically no popular clamour for the successful bits of the US to secede from the crap bits.
I realise "American exceptionalism" and all that, but surely if you're from California (population slightly smaller than Spain), it must grate just a little that you have the same number of senators as Wyoming (population slightly larger than Leicester)?
I've never quite understood why there is basically no popular clamour for the successful bits of the US to secede from the crap bits.
I realise "American exceptionalism" and all that, but surely if you're from California (population slightly smaller than Spain), it must grate just a little that you have the same number of senators as Wyoming (population slightly larger than Leicester)?
If California is that “successful” how come so many of them are moving to Texas? Have you visited the West Coast recently?
I guess we can now expect some rightwing loon like Patel to announce that this reform in America is just what we need here.
No, she won’t. Abortion, thankfully, remains unpoliticised in the UK. It will remain so
And besides, if ever a move against abortion did come, it would come from Roman Catholics, who are just as likely to be found on the Left or in the Libs as in the Tory party
It's very unlikely anything will happen here as far fewer people are religious. We've broadly moved on from the fairy tales in a way America has not.
I've never quite understood why there is basically no popular clamour for the successful bits of the US to secede from the crap bits.
I realise "American exceptionalism" and all that, but surely if you're from California (population slightly smaller than Spain), it must grate just a little that you have the same number of senators as Wyoming (population slightly larger than Leicester)?
problem is texas is a red state and oil rich and hardly one of the crap states....also many of the crap states are resource rich
I'm glad, at least for now, in the UK abortion and gun controls are not on the political agenda, the former is a conscience issue whereas any party that tries to undo the Dunblane laws is going to end up polling zero.
I've never quite understood why there is basically no popular clamour for the successful bits of the US to secede from the crap bits.
I realise "American exceptionalism" and all that, but surely if you're from California (population slightly smaller than Spain), it must grate just a little that you have the same number of senators as Wyoming (population slightly larger than Leicester)?
If California is that “successful” how come so many of them are moving to Texas? Have you visited the West Coast recently?
Yes, the other year. It's not particularly to my taste but it is, for better or worse, still where the world is shaped.
I've never quite understood why there is basically no popular clamour for the successful bits of the US to secede from the crap bits.
I realise "American exceptionalism" and all that, but surely if you're from California (population slightly smaller than Spain), it must grate just a little that you have the same number of senators as Wyoming (population slightly larger than Leicester)?
If California is that “successful” how come so many of them are moving to Texas? Have you visited the West Coast recently?
Yes, the other year. It's not particularly to my taste but it is, for better or worse, still where the world is shaped.
Sent from my iPhone
LA has spiralled into decline in the last few years. I hear SF is worse. Also Portland and Seattle
I guess we can now expect some rightwing loon like Patel to announce that this reform in America is just what we need here.
No, she won’t. Abortion, thankfully, remains unpoliticised in the UK. It will remain so
And besides, if ever a move against abortion did come, it would come from Roman Catholics, who are just as likely to be found on the Left or in the Libs as in the Tory party
It's very unlikely anything will happen here as far fewer people are religious. We've broadly moved on from the fairy tales in a way America has not.
That's cos we exported a lot of our zealots over there.
It has made clear abortion will now be decided by the American people via their elected representatives not the Supreme Court. So the pro life states, especially in the South and Bible Belt, can respect the rights of the unborn in their legislation.
The coastal pro choice states will likely largely stay as was
Shocking that Boris's Brexit Britain has once again been overruled by the forrin. All he wanted to do was remove the uppity British Secretary General with an Australian, and they have disrespected our Brexit mandate and voted to retain her.
Time for Global Britain to truly take its place on the world stage by withdrawing from the Commonwealth. Boooo I say, Booooooooooo.
“Clarence Thomas writes, in a concurring opinion, that the Supreme Court should reconsider Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell — the rulings that now protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage.”
I'm glad, at least for now, in the UK abortion and gun controls are not on the political agenda, the former is a conscience issue whereas any party that tries to undo the Dunblane laws is going to end up polling zero.
Jeremy Hunt has made clear he would try and reduce the abortion time limit if he became PM.
Rees Mogg opposes abortion completely as a strict Roman Catholic
It has made clear abortion will now be decided by the American people via their elected representatives not the Supreme Court. So the pro life states, especially in the South and Bible Belt, can respect the rights of the unborn in their legislation.
The coastal pro choice states will likely largely stay as was
By your logic and the conservative justices on SCOTUS things like Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka are up for repeal as well.
“Clarence Thomas writes, in a concurring opinion, that the Supreme Court should reconsider Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell — the rulings that now protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage.”
Shocking that Boris's Brexit Britain has once again been overruled by the forrin. All he wanted to do was remove the uppity British Secretary General with an Australian, and they have disrespected our Brexit mandate and voted to retain her.
Time for Global Britain to truly take its place on the world stage by withdrawing from the Commonwealth. Boooo I say, Booooooooooo.
He wanted to replace her with a Jamaican I believe but the Commonwealth's decision
“Clarence Thomas writes, in a concurring opinion, that the Supreme Court should reconsider Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell — the rulings that now protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage.”
Nadine Dorries and the other collaborators in the UK culture war can feck right off.
It’s a two way war, pal
Republicans v women.
pal.
It’s not outrageous to believe that all human life begins at conception, and must therefore be protected as much as a baby
I don’t agree but I respect that sincere belief honestly held by many in the USA
Trouble is SOME right wingers have hijacked this cause as a way to monster the Left, as they believe the Left is bent on destroying the America they know
“Clarence Thomas writes, in a concurring opinion, that the Supreme Court should reconsider Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell — the rulings that now protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage.”
“Clarence Thomas writes, in a concurring opinion, that the Supreme Court should reconsider Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell — the rulings that now protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage.”
“Clarence Thomas writes, in a concurring opinion, that the Supreme Court should reconsider Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell — the rulings that now protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage.”
“Clarence Thomas writes, in a concurring opinion, that the Supreme Court should reconsider Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell — the rulings that now protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage.”
Griswold, possibly, as that also relies on the right to privacy. But Lawrence and Obergefell both rely on the 14th Amendment, and the text of that seems pretty clear.
It has made clear abortion will now be decided by the American people via their elected representatives not the Supreme Court. So the pro life states, especially in the South and Bible Belt, can respect the rights of the unborn in their legislation.
The coastal pro choice states will likely largely stay as was
Nadine Dorries and the other collaborators in the UK culture war can feck right off.
It’s a two way war, pal
Republicans v women.
pal.
It’s not outrageous to believe that all human life begins at conception, and must therefore be protected as much as a baby
I don’t agree but I respect that sincere belief honestly held by many in the USA
Trouble is SOME right wingers have hijacked this cause as a way to monster the Left, as they believe the Left is bent on destroying the America they know
Significant civil strife is now more likely than not, in America
I don’t see how else this ends. It is a fight to the death
to be fair its time parts of the sexual revolution were rolled back and its got to start somewhere
Ok, I've already made an arse of myself once today, by taking a joke as serious comment, so help me out here - should there be a at the end of that statement?
“Clarence Thomas writes, in a concurring opinion, that the Supreme Court should reconsider Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell — the rulings that now protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage.”
One could argue that the biggest cause of reduction of liberal rights in the USA is Ruth Bader Ginsburg. If she had the slightest humility she would have resigned whilst a Democrat was President. She didn't and this is now the result.
“Clarence Thomas writes, in a concurring opinion, that the Supreme Court should reconsider Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell — the rulings that now protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage.”
Significant civil strife is now more likely than not, in America
I don’t see how else this ends. It is a fight to the death
to be fair its time parts of the sexual revolution were rolled back and its got to start somewhere
An incel speaks.
lol i love the ad hominem attacks pal when you have no arguments
The remark I was responding to was so demented that I am uncertain what an argument to the contrary would even look like. There was an involuntarily gay Christian bloke who used to post here who projected his hatred of his own sexuality by exaggerated demands that the state should interfere in everyone else's. You are from the same stable.
Shocking that Boris's Brexit Britain has once again been overruled by the forrin. All he wanted to do was remove the uppity British Secretary General with an Australian, and they have disrespected our Brexit mandate and voted to retain her.
Time for Global Britain to truly take its place on the world stage by withdrawing from the Commonwealth. Boooo I say, Booooooooooo.
He wanted to replace her with a Jamaican I believe but the Commonwealth's decision
How very dare they. Foreigners interfering with the will of the people.
Your crook is so shit that he can't even get through his choice for Commonwealth head.
“Clarence Thomas writes, in a concurring opinion, that the Supreme Court should reconsider Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell — the rulings that now protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage.”
Griswold, possibly, as that also relies on the right to privacy. But Lawrence and Obergefell both rely on the 14th Amendment, and the text of that seems pretty clear.
He's asking for someone to ask him to rule on the Fourteenth Amendment.
It has made clear abortion will now be decided by the American people via their elected representatives not the Supreme Court. So the pro life states, especially in the South and Bible Belt, can respect the rights of the unborn in their legislation.
The coastal pro choice states will likely largely stay as was
By your logic and the conservative justices on SCOTUS things like Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka are up for repeal as well.
Only if states agree which is unlikely.
Indeed plenty of Black Pentecostals and Hispanic Roman Catholics are also pro life and anti abortion
“Clarence Thomas writes, in a concurring opinion, that the Supreme Court should reconsider Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell — the rulings that now protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage.”
“Clarence Thomas writes, in a concurring opinion, that the Supreme Court should reconsider Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell — the rulings that now protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage.”
Significant civil strife is now more likely than not, in America
I don’t see how else this ends. It is a fight to the death
to be fair its time parts of the sexual revolution were rolled back and its got to start somewhere
An incel speaks.
lol i love the ad hominem attacks pal when you have no arguments
The remark I was responding to was so demented that I am uncertain what an argument to the contrary would even look like. There was an involuntarily gay Christian bloke who used to post here who projected his hatred of his own sexuality by exaggerated demands that the state should interfere in everyone else's. You are from the same stable.
mate its quite possible the sexual revolution will be rolled back....you are so blinded by woke ideology you may not see it coming
Significant civil strife is now more likely than not, in America
I don’t see how else this ends. It is a fight to the death
to be fair its time parts of the sexual revolution were rolled back and its got to start somewhere
Ok, I've already made an arse of myself once today, by taking a joke as serious comment, so help me out here - should there be a at the end of that statement?
If not, which bits, exactly?
Well, quite. It's which bits go where, that is the whole issue (so to speak).
Nice of the US supreme court to hand Boris another dead cat. The man's a genius.
Yep. Big Dog already knocked off BBC news website top half of page by the US news.
It's almost as if his whips checked the supreme court comms grid before signing off on moving the writs.
That must mean Johnson's minor difficulty in Devon is pushed down to at least third on the BBC bulletins after RvW and their previous top story, Labour's "train-wreck" in Wakefield.
It has made clear abortion will now be decided by the American people via their elected representatives not the Supreme Court. So the pro life states, especially in the South and Bible Belt, can respect the rights of the unborn in their legislation.
The coastal pro choice states will likely largely stay as was
The corollary is that abortion rights will become an election issue in each state, which might stir things up more than expected by either side.
“Clarence Thomas writes, in a concurring opinion, that the Supreme Court should reconsider Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell — the rulings that now protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage.”
“Clarence Thomas writes, in a concurring opinion, that the Supreme Court should reconsider Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell — the rulings that now protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage.”
One could argue that the biggest cause of reduction of liberal rights in the USA is Ruth Bader Ginsburg. If she had the slightest humility she would have resigned whilst a Democrat was President. She didn't and this is now the result.
Indeed. Two Justices, maybe even three, that were appointed by Democrats, should consider that there’s only six months left of a Dem Senate.
It has made clear abortion will now be decided by the American people via their elected representatives not the Supreme Court. So the pro life states, especially in the South and Bible Belt, can respect the rights of the unborn in their legislation.
The coastal pro choice states will likely largely stay as was
The corollary is that abortion rights will become an election issue in each state, which might stir things up more than expected by either side.
Turnout is going to be very high in State elections this year, that’s for sure.
Significant civil strife is now more likely than not, in America
I don’t see how else this ends. It is a fight to the death
to be fair its time parts of the sexual revolution were rolled back and its got to start somewhere
Ok, I've already made an arse of myself once today, by taking a joke as serious comment, so help me out here - should there be a at the end of that statement?
If not, which bits, exactly?
is total sexual freedom beneficial for society or not...answer me that...not talking about for women or men but society as a whole
Significant civil strife is now more likely than not, in America
I don’t see how else this ends. It is a fight to the death
to be fair its time parts of the sexual revolution were rolled back and its got to start somewhere
An incel speaks.
lol i love the ad hominem attacks pal when you have no arguments
The remark I was responding to was so demented that I am uncertain what an argument to the contrary would even look like. There was an involuntarily gay Christian bloke who used to post here who projected his hatred of his own sexuality by exaggerated demands that the state should interfere in everyone else's. You are from the same stable.
mate its quite possible the sexual revolution will be rolled back....you are so blinded by woke ideology you may not see it coming
I am not your mate. Nor, I now very strongly believe, is anyone else. Incel.
“Clarence Thomas writes, in a concurring opinion, that the Supreme Court should reconsider Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell — the rulings that now protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage.”
One could argue that the biggest cause of reduction of liberal rights in the USA is Ruth Bader Ginsburg. If she had the slightest humility she would have resigned whilst a Democrat was President. She didn't and this is now the result.
There would still be a 5-4 majority with Roberts as the median vote instead of ... I guess, Gorsuch?
It has made clear abortion will now be decided by the American people via their elected representatives not the Supreme Court. So the pro life states, especially in the South and Bible Belt, can respect the rights of the unborn in their legislation.
The coastal pro choice states will likely largely stay as was
By your logic and the conservative justices on SCOTUS things like Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka are up for repeal as well.
Only if states agree which is unlikely.
Indeed plenty of Black Pentecostals and Hispanic Roman Catholics are also pro life and anti abortion
Some US pollsters claiming a big shift in hispanic voters away from the Democrats. IF so, massive. We'll know more in November
“Clarence Thomas writes, in a concurring opinion, that the Supreme Court should reconsider Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell — the rulings that now protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage.”
Griswold, possibly, as that also relies on the right to privacy. But Lawrence and Obergefell both rely on the 14th Amendment, and the text of that seems pretty clear.
He's asking for someone to ask him to rule on the Fourteenth Amendment.
Isn’t that him saying this ruling does NOT affect other rights like same sex marriage?
“Clarence Thomas writes, in a concurring opinion, that the Supreme Court should reconsider Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell — the rulings that now protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage.”
Nadine Dorries and the other collaborators in the UK culture war can feck right off.
It’s a two way war, pal
Republicans v women.
pal.
It’s not outrageous to believe that all human life begins at conception, and must therefore be protected as much as a baby
I don’t agree but I respect that sincere belief honestly held by many in the USA
Trouble is SOME right wingers have hijacked this cause as a way to monster the Left, as they believe the Left is bent on destroying the America they know
It’s a war. Pal.
Three of the judges on the SCOTUS are Trump picks
I bet he's loving this.
All he did was fill the vacancies that arose in his term. It's not his fault that RBG was stubborn and selfish.
“Clarence Thomas writes, in a concurring opinion, that the Supreme Court should reconsider Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell — the rulings that now protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage.”
Significant civil strife is now more likely than not, in America
I don’t see how else this ends. It is a fight to the death
to be fair its time parts of the sexual revolution were rolled back and its got to start somewhere
An incel speaks.
lol i love the ad hominem attacks pal when you have no arguments
The remark I was responding to was so demented that I am uncertain what an argument to the contrary would even look like. There was an involuntarily gay Christian bloke who used to post here who projected his hatred of his own sexuality by exaggerated demands that the state should interfere in everyone else's. You are from the same stable.
mate its quite possible the sexual revolution will be rolled back....you are so blinded by woke ideology you may not see it coming
Which parts of the sexual revolution do you want rolling back? Your ability to discriminate against us sexual deviants? The right to slap your girlfriend if she looks at you funny?
“Clarence Thomas writes, in a concurring opinion, that the Supreme Court should reconsider Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell — the rulings that now protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage.”
Significant civil strife is now more likely than not, in America
I don’t see how else this ends. It is a fight to the death
to be fair its time parts of the sexual revolution were rolled back and its got to start somewhere
An incel speaks.
lol i love the ad hominem attacks pal when you have no arguments
The remark I was responding to was so demented that I am uncertain what an argument to the contrary would even look like. There was an involuntarily gay Christian bloke who used to post here who projected his hatred of his own sexuality by exaggerated demands that the state should interfere in everyone else's. You are from the same stable.
mate its quite possible the sexual revolution will be rolled back....you are so blinded by woke ideology you may not see it coming
I am not your mate. Nor, I now very strongly believe, is anyone else. Incel.
you have the maturity of a 5 year old lol...give me some arguments in favour of the sexual revolution....oh you have none
I think the Russians have given up on the more overt trolls, and inserted a more subtle one. Their intent is the same, to increase division irrespective of why.
“Clarence Thomas writes, in a concurring opinion, that the Supreme Court should reconsider Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell — the rulings that now protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage.”
Nadine Dorries and the other collaborators in the UK culture war can feck right off.
It’s a two way war, pal
Republicans v women.
pal.
It’s not outrageous to believe that all human life begins at conception, and must therefore be protected as much as a baby
I don’t agree but I respect that sincere belief honestly held by many in the USA
Trouble is SOME right wingers have hijacked this cause as a way to monster the Left, as they believe the Left is bent on destroying the America they know
It’s a war. Pal.
Three of the judges on the SCOTUS are Trump picks
I bet he's loving this.
All he did was fill the vacancies that arose in his term. It's not his fault that RBG was stubborn and selfish.
Trump faced a storm of liberal criticism for his picks. He toughed it out. That is what he will claim.
“Clarence Thomas writes, in a concurring opinion, that the Supreme Court should reconsider Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell — the rulings that now protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage.”
Griswold, possibly, as that also relies on the right to privacy. But Lawrence and Obergefell both rely on the 14th Amendment, and the text of that seems pretty clear.
He's asking for someone to ask him to rule on the Fourteenth Amendment.
Isn’t that him saying this ruling does NOT affect other rights like same sex marriage?
But IANAL, as they say
The rights we enjoy in life are very easy to overturn, given enough malice in a country's leadership. Sadly, progression does not have to be one-way.
Honestly, there's more Pal in here today than in Pedigree Petfoods, Melton Mowbray.
Now wondering when the Winalot will join it.
PS Rather disconcertingly, there is also a pork pie factory at Melton, as I recall from trundling through it on the train. But we had plenty of those earlier today (and regularly, of course).
Significant civil strife is now more likely than not, in America
I don’t see how else this ends. It is a fight to the death
to be fair its time parts of the sexual revolution were rolled back and its got to start somewhere
An incel speaks.
lol i love the ad hominem attacks pal when you have no arguments
The remark I was responding to was so demented that I am uncertain what an argument to the contrary would even look like. There was an involuntarily gay Christian bloke who used to post here who projected his hatred of his own sexuality by exaggerated demands that the state should interfere in everyone else's. You are from the same stable.
mate its quite possible the sexual revolution will be rolled back....you are so blinded by woke ideology you may not see it coming
I am not your mate. Nor, I now very strongly believe, is anyone else. Incel.
you have the maturity of a 5 year old lol...give me some arguments in favour of the sexual revolution....oh you have none
“Clarence Thomas writes, in a concurring opinion, that the Supreme Court should reconsider Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell — the rulings that now protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage.”
Nadine Dorries and the other collaborators in the UK culture war can feck right off.
It’s a two way war, pal
Republicans v women.
pal.
It’s not outrageous to believe that all human life begins at conception, and must therefore be protected as much as a baby
I don’t agree but I respect that sincere belief honestly held by many in the USA
Trouble is SOME right wingers have hijacked this cause as a way to monster the Left, as they believe the Left is bent on destroying the America they know
It’s a war. Pal.
Three of the judges on the SCOTUS are Trump picks
I bet he's loving this.
All he did was fill the vacancies that arose in his term. It's not his fault that RBG was stubborn and selfish.
...and one from the previous term, and on that basis, one that should have been left for the next term.
“Clarence Thomas writes, in a concurring opinion, that the Supreme Court should reconsider Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell — the rulings that now protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage.”
Griswold, possibly, as that also relies on the right to privacy. But Lawrence and Obergefell both rely on the 14th Amendment, and the text of that seems pretty clear.
He's asking for someone to ask him to rule on the Fourteenth Amendment.
Isn’t that him saying this ruling does NOT affect other rights like same sex marriage?
But IANAL, as they say
An unfortunate yet apposite acronym given the subject.
Comments
I don’t see how else this ends. It is a fight to the death
The King does some provocative thing
Parliament reacts by being even more provocative
The King returns fire with something outrageous
Parliament is unfazed and does something REALLY outrageous
The King goes crazy
Parliament howls at the moon
And thus in a few short years England fell from normal, fairly calm Christian European country to brutal civil war, tens of thousands dead, and a king with his head in a basket
At each stage English people must have thought: Well this is bonkers, but surely it stops now. It did not
Nadine Dorries and the other collaborators in the UK culture war can feck right off.
And besides, if ever a move against abortion did come, it would come from Roman Catholics, who are just as likely to be found on the Left or in the Libs as in the Tory party
I realise "American exceptionalism" and all that, but surely if you're from California (population slightly smaller than Spain), it must grate just a little that you have the same number of senators as Wyoming (population slightly larger than Leicester)?
If California is that “successful” how come so many of them are moving to Texas? Have you visited the West Coast recently?
Sent from my iPhone
It's almost as if his whips checked the supreme court comms grid before signing off on moving the writs.
LA has spiralled into decline in the last few years. I hear SF is worse. Also Portland and Seattle
It’s not great
You: "AAAAAAAH CULTURE WAR, CULTURE WAR"
pal.
It has made clear abortion will now be decided by the American people via their elected representatives not the Supreme Court. So the pro life states, especially in the South and Bible Belt, can respect the rights of the unborn in their legislation.
The coastal pro choice states will likely largely stay as was
Time for Global Britain to truly take its place on the world stage by withdrawing from the Commonwealth. Boooo I say, Booooooooooo.
https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1540339085230968834?s=21&t=GXxpUIgAn49NjQ-Tb80I_w
The legal basis for today's ruling is beyond threadbare.
Rees Mogg opposes abortion completely as a strict Roman Catholic
I don’t agree but I respect that sincere belief honestly held by many in the USA
Trouble is SOME right wingers have hijacked this cause as a way to monster the Left, as they believe the Left is bent on destroying the America they know
It’s a war. Pal.
Search for Lawrence.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf
I bet he's loving this.
If not, which bits, exactly?
Your crook is so shit that he can't even get through his choice for Commonwealth head.
Indeed plenty of Black Pentecostals and Hispanic Roman Catholics are also pro life and anti abortion
Given this, the rise of the right in France and the conservative voter strike here, its almost as if the West's Overton Window is shifting.
November 2022 is the next litmus test. And boy what a test.
But IANAL, as they say
And women only sort of.
Trump faced a storm of liberal criticism for his picks. He toughed it out. That is what he will claim.
America is discovering this the hard way.
PS Rather disconcertingly, there is also a pork pie factory at Melton, as I recall from trundling through it on the train. But we had plenty of those earlier today (and regularly, of course).