Ian Goodfellow, Apple’s director of machine learning, is leaving the company due to its return to work policy. In a note to staff, he said “I believe strongly that more flexibility would have been the best policy for my team.” He was likely the company’s most cited ML expert.
He’s seen the future, and he and I concur.
Yes, I know of two people who have left companies with required in-office attendance for companies that offer pure wfh.
Boris is audacious and cares about nothing except himself. Is there really *nothing* he could offer one of the smaller parties that Kier Starmer wouldn't?
- SNP: Independence referendum - LD: Referendum on PR and/or rejoining EU - DUP: Ban dancing, digital watches and most kinds of hats, or whatever it is they want
EU referendum?
Jesus.
Can you imagine if he gave them that, and then rejoin won?
Boris is audacious and cares about nothing except himself. Is there really *nothing* he could offer one of the smaller parties that Kier Starmer wouldn't?
- SNP: Independence referendum - LD: Referendum on PR and/or rejoining EU - DUP: Ban dancing, digital watches and most kinds of hats, or whatever it is they want
EU referendum?
Jesus.
Can you imagine if he gave them that, and then rejoin won?
Good for the economy, and he doesn't particularly care either way.
Is this a conspiracy by Corbynites and the left to discredited Starmer for his move to the centre ?
Well someone leaked it and someone must have a motive.
Is there anything untoward? It's exactly the sort of itinery everyone who works on location would get daily. How else would they do it?
What labour should really worry about is who is leaking this and their motive
I have already suggested this could be a reaction from Corbynites and the left in response to Starmer's move to the centre
The could just have much wide implications for labour
It’s all very cloak and dagger . I suspect Starmer will be gone soon which personally I feel is a shame .
It smells like a story cooked up in Tory HQ, eagerly promoted by Tory-friendly media, and now the Labour far left are joining in.
Not a crowd I’d personally like any part of.
Some Corbyn fans would rather see Labour lose a GE than have the non pure Starmer win. It really pisses me off when some in Labour won’t accept the imperfect but bearable because unless any leader has passes the left purity test they’d rather just watch the Tories destroy the country .
SKS fans won't accept he is shit and that the Tories will sail to another victory under him.
The only people with a purity test is Starmer and co. He has spent more time attacking Socialists for purely factional reasons than attacking the Tories.
Suck it up.
There once was a governor called Clinton Getting nowhere in his campaign Along came a whistblower Saying he flashed her his todger And he never looked back again
Stop trying to make Starmer seem somehow interesting, like a bad boy, that’s not your role here - it’s only going to do him good I warn you.
Is this a conspiracy by Corbynites and the left to discredited Starmer for his move to the centre ?
Well someone leaked it and someone must have a motive.
Is there anything untoward? It's exactly the sort of itinery everyone who works on location would get daily. How else would they do it?
What labour should really worry about is who is leaking this and their motive
I have already suggested this could be a reaction from Corbynites and the left in response to Starmer's move to the centre
The could just have much wide implications for labour
Your palpable joy that after Starmer's imminent defenestration he might be replaced by an unelectable Corbynista to face Johnson in a couple of years is quite disturbing. Firstly a Government needs to be kept in check by a competent Opposition and secondly events could go wrong to the point that we see Prime Minister Rebecca Long-Bailey.
He's committed a cardinal sin. Being a plausible Labour PM. However. He isn't very good. Boris is a tactical political savant unmatched. Unfortunately, I fear he's also a strategic buffoon. I held no truck with the idea we were headed for a '97 before this weekend. No I'm not so sure. It may not happen next time, but Big Dog is leading the Tories into the wilderness for a generation. There is no suggestion that the fact that they've lost 1 in 5 councillors has even been cause for a moments reflection. Just destroy the prevailing threat as it presents. Just like Sunak. Meanwhile, his own popularity just falls. Because it can't actually just be that he might possibly be at all inadequate.
This is the correct analysis.
Hubris (along with corruption, incompetence and deceit) has overtaken the Tories.
I see a tweet was issued by Keir Starmer at 10:13pm of the night in question, including photos from his campaign visit. So *somebody* was working.
If they tweeted that from a room in the hotel where multiple people were working together, than would be relevant. If they were working on some late night social media posts on their own in their room before turning in, it would not.
This whole thing is very silly though. Neither Boris nor Keir should resign.
Even if exonerated by this investigation, in many ways that should send out dangerous vibes to the electorate. We all know what Starmer is - no FPN sheds light on it BIG TIME
No one will believe him if he claimed he has had sex with the light on, so if he could see what I’ve got in boxes under my bed he’d be traumatised.
Some people actually worked through that “event” at least one carried on afterwards. For that reason and that reason alone Starmer’s popularity ratings really ought to plummet, if there is any sense in the electorate - what a stupendously boring fart.
We all know what he is, that’s exactly why he fails to get a FPN.
Can you repeat that, this time in English?
Do you think there’s people out there this Saturday night Anabob, wearing Starmer masks, and their partners asking: give it to me, like a Big Dog.
Saw Zelensky promoting a fundraising initiative for Ukraine - what's interesting is the site gives options on 'direction of donation' eg defence and demining, medical aid, rebuild Ukraine. I wonder if some people, fired up with anger about the invasion, whilst happy to support various charity initiatives, actually would prefer the idea they are funding munitions, the opposite of the usual response to an aid appeal.
This is what I've been looking for. And you're right. I DON'T want my donation being used for namby-pamby things like clothes and medical supplies. I want them to use it to buy guns.
Boris is audacious and cares about nothing except himself. Is there really *nothing* he could offer one of the smaller parties that Kier Starmer wouldn't?
- SNP: Independence referendum - LD: Referendum on PR and/or rejoining EU - DUP: Ban dancing, digital watches and most kinds of hats, or whatever it is they want
EU referendum?
Jesus.
Can you imagine if he gave them that, and then rejoin won?
It would be eye-wateringly hilarious to begin with. But I don't think even Boris could be that cynical and the ensuing civil war might take some of the merriment out of it.
Crowdfunding military equipment is such a boneheaded idea I can't even believe it's really a thing. That's a doorway into a special kind of darkness that goes by the name of anarchy. I would shut that down in a second.
He's committed a cardinal sin. Being a plausible Labour PM. However. He isn't very good. Boris is a tactical political savant unmatched. Unfortunately, I fear he's also a strategic buffoon. I held no truck with the idea we were headed for a '97 before this weekend. No I'm not so sure. It may not happen next time, but Big Dog is leading the Tories into the wilderness for a generation. There is no suggestion that the fact that they've lost 1 in 5 councillors has even been cause for a moments reflection. Just destroy the prevailing threat as it presents. Just like Sunak. Meanwhile, his own popularity just falls. Because it can't actually just be that he might possibly be at all inadequate.
This is the correct analysis.
Hubris (along with corruption, incompetence and deceit) has overtaken the Tories.
I see a tweet was issued by Keir Starmer at 10:13pm of the night in question, including photos from his campaign visit. So *somebody* was working.
If they tweeted that from a room in the hotel where multiple people were working together, than would be relevant. If they were working on some late night social media posts on their own in their room before turning in, it would not.
This whole thing is very silly though. Neither Boris nor Keir should resign.
Even if exonerated by this investigation, in many ways that should send out dangerous vibes to the electorate. We all know what Starmer is - no FPN sheds light on it BIG TIME
No one will believe him if he claimed he has had sex with the light on, so if he could see what I’ve got in boxes under my bed he’d be traumatised.
Some people actually worked through that “event” at least one carried on afterwards. For that reason and that reason alone Starmer’s popularity ratings really ought to plummet, if there is any sense in the electorate - what a stupendously boring fart.
We all know what he is, that’s exactly why he fails to get a FPN.
Can you repeat that, this time in English?
Do you think there’s people out there this Saturday night Anabob, wearing Starmer masks, and their partners asking: give it to me, like a Big Dog.
Ian Goodfellow, Apple’s director of machine learning, is leaving the company due to its return to work policy. In a note to staff, he said “I believe strongly that more flexibility would have been the best policy for my team.” He was likely the company’s most cited ML expert.
He’s seen the future, and he and I concur.
Yes, I know of two people who have left companies with required in-office attendance for companies that offer pure wfh.
The worry, of course, is those who can’t vote with their feet. I think we need a real push for union membership. (I say this as someone broadly on the right, but who has always been in a union).
Boris is audacious and cares about nothing except himself. Is there really *nothing* he could offer one of the smaller parties that Kier Starmer wouldn't?
- SNP: Independence referendum - LD: Referendum on PR and/or rejoining EU - DUP: Ban dancing, digital watches and most kinds of hats, or whatever it is they want
It's fairly unlikely that a hung parliament would have two plausible stable coalitions. Most likely is a choice between one plausible stable coalition and another election.
And a minor party that triggers another election in such circumstances is likely to suffer for pissing off the Brenda from Bristol tendency.
Crowdfunding military equipment is such a boneheaded idea I can't even believe it's really a thing. That's a doorway into a special kind of darkness that goes by the name of anarchy. I would shut that down in a second.
Feed the guns and help to end the war.
Similar adverts in USA during WW2.
Though IIRC the biggest impetus for US government was NOT paying for the war but rather preventing inflation by taking doors out of circulation, temporarily. And it worked, or certainly helped. Also gave people sense of participating AND supporting war effort from home front.
Boris is audacious and cares about nothing except himself. Is there really *nothing* he could offer one of the smaller parties that Kier Starmer wouldn't?
- SNP: Independence referendum - LD: Referendum on PR and/or rejoining EU - DUP: Ban dancing, digital watches and most kinds of hats, or whatever it is they want
It's fairly unlikely that a hung parliament would have two plausible stable coalitions. Most likely is a choice between one plausible stable coalition and another election.
And a minor party that triggers another election in such circumstances is likely to suffer for pissing off the Brenda from Bristol tendency.
That's generally true and I think it applies at the Starmer end: If he's a little bit short, LD and SNP will feel pressure to get rid of Boris and let him have a go.
But at the Tory end I don't think anyone's under any particular obligation. If anything relighting the fag end of an exhausted government looks kind of bad. So I think the choice between Con Minority and a new election comes down to whether Boris can offer the people with the votes he needs something they want.
DUP takes 90th seat in NI Assembly - new members from one end to the other
TUV 1 (0 diff from 2017) Ind U (exDUP) 1 (0) DUP 25 (-3) Ind U (exUUP) 1 (0) UUP 9 (-1) AP 17 (+9) GP 0 (-2) PBP 1 (0) SDLP 8 (-4) SF (0)
I don't believe Claire Sugden was ever an elected UUP representative; I'd put her rather on the Alliance side of the UUP, the endangered liberal unionist. (And the ex-DUP category is a +1 gain.)
He might even be right. Fwiw (and see Roger's take earlier in this thread) I can't offhand see that its being planned makes any difference whether you think this is entirely innocent or Sodom and Gomorrah. I can see it makes things worse for Starmer simply because it keeps the story moving.
In more innocent times we'd be looking at tweeted pictures of ministers and their teams surrounded by the detritus of their favourite posh takeaway to show how hard they were working.
The coverage I've just heard about the Azovstal steelworks is utterly utterly bizzare. The civilians are now out according to BBC news with around 2000 odd Kyiv aligned fighters in the plant. They're not going to surrender yet there are "fears about what Russia is going to do". It's a battle zone, they're fighters. They're not surrendering. What on earth do they expect Russia to try and do ?!?
The coverage I've just heard about the Azovstal steelworks is utterly utterly bizzare. The civilians are now out according to BBC news with around 2000 odd Kyiv aligned fighters in the plant. They're not going to surrender yet there are "fears about what Russia is going to do". It's a battle zone, they're fighters. They're not surrendering. What on earth do they expect Russia to try and do ?!?
That might depend on whether Russia wants to capture a working steel mill or a pile of rubble.
The coverage I've just heard about the Azovstal steelworks is utterly utterly bizzare. The civilians are now out according to BBC news with around 2000 odd Kyiv aligned fighters in the plant. They're not going to surrender yet there are "fears about what Russia is going to do". It's a battle zone, they're fighters. They're not surrendering. What on earth do they expect Russia to try and do ?!?
That might depend on whether Russia wants to capture a working steel mill or a pile of rubble.
It's a long way past working given the amount of ordinance dropped on it
He might even be right. Fwiw (and see Roger's take earlier in this thread) I can't offhand see that its being planned makes any difference whether you think this is entirely innocent or Sodom and Gomorrah. I can see it makes things worse for Starmer simply because it keeps the story moving.
I believe the point is that the memo says the plan was on the campaign trial, then when finished there will be organised food / drinks and nothing after. This wasn't really allowed at the time. And Starmer's story has been they were on the campaign trial, briefing stopped for a takeaway and then cracked on again.
Now there is a story in the Times that it descended into a bit of piss up, now that's a bigger problem.
Overall the infraction at best is minor, but its the cover-up and hypocrisy that gets you. If Starmer hadn't two footed on Boris and said the rules were confusing at times, it is probably true everybody broken them inadvertently at some point, however Boris behaviour was to actively encourage a culture of consistent ignoring of the rules.
He might even be right. Fwiw (and see Roger's take earlier in this thread) I can't offhand see that its being planned makes any difference whether you think this is entirely innocent or Sodom and Gomorrah. I can see it makes things worse for Starmer simply because it keeps the story moving.
I suspect it turns on whether they continued work afterwards. If they finished work and then ate & went home why couldn’t they go to their hotels and eat alone.
The coverage I've just heard about the Azovstal steelworks is utterly utterly bizzare. The civilians are now out according to BBC news with around 2000 odd Kyiv aligned fighters in the plant. They're not going to surrender yet there are "fears about what Russia is going to do". It's a battle zone, they're fighters. They're not surrendering. What on earth do they expect Russia to try and do ?!?
They used a thermobaric bomb a couple of days ago… maybe a small nuke next…
"Europe's tourist hotspots mourn lack of big-spending Russians The reverberations of the Ukraine conflict are being felt across Europe’s tourism hubs as they face acute financial losses" (£)
"Europe's tourist hotspots mourn lack of big-spending Russians The reverberations of the Ukraine conflict are being felt across Europe’s tourism hubs as they face acute financial losses" (£)
Sanctions against Russia are a blunt instrument. Forcing the sale of Chelsea has not noticeably shortened the war special military operation. Neither the oligarchs nor the man on the Moscow omnibus control Putin. Freezing Russian banks out of the international payments system has blunted the Russian economy but the West is handing over $1 billion a day for Russian gas. You might have hoped that Whitehall, Washington and Brussels would have had smarter plans filed away.
He might even be right. Fwiw (and see Roger's take earlier in this thread) I can't offhand see that its being planned makes any difference whether you think this is entirely innocent or Sodom and Gomorrah. I can see it makes things worse for Starmer simply because it keeps the story moving.
I suspect it turns on whether they continued work afterwards. If they finished work and then ate & went home why couldn’t they go to their hotels and eat alone.
It’s all daft anyway
Can you eat takeaway food in hotels? The logistics probably demanded something like this: either organise food or have some sort of complicated expenses system. Otherwise Labour is in Top Gear territory where Jeremy Clarkson thumped a producer for not having arranged food at the end of a day's filming.
But it does look bad for Starmer, even if the Durham rozzers eventually give him the all-clear.
Comments
Jesus.
Can you imagine if he gave them that, and then rejoin won?
Getting nowhere in his campaign
Along came a whistblower
Saying he flashed her his todger
And he never looked back again
Stop trying to make Starmer seem somehow interesting, like a bad boy, that’s not your role here - it’s only going to do him good I warn you.
No, there really isn’t. Not one.
And you're right. I DON'T want my donation being used for namby-pamby things like clothes and medical supplies.
I want them to use it to buy guns.
And a minor party that triggers another election in such circumstances is likely to suffer for pissing off the Brenda from Bristol tendency.
Starmer has been dancing around the ring expecting Marquis of Queensbury etiquette as Johnson simply kicks him in the nuts.
Johnson is a cage fighter who genuinely dates pole dancers.
Though IIRC the biggest impetus for US government was NOT paying for the war but rather preventing inflation by taking doors out of circulation, temporarily. And it worked, or certainly helped. Also gave people sense of participating AND supporting war effort from home front.
But at the Tory end I don't think anyone's under any particular obligation. If anything relighting the fag end of an exhausted government looks kind of bad. So I think the choice between Con Minority and a new election comes down to whether Boris can offer the people with the votes he needs something they want.
https://twitter.com/AdamWagner1/status/1522978254142980096
Takeaways rarely stay hot very long and after an hour they taste horrible in my experience.
So unlucky for the Labour staff I guess, they should have got a birthday cake instead
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-61365446
I wondered how long it would take until he got arrested.
Popular vote [using highest vote method]
Lab 106,411
Con 59,604
LD 31,425
Green 14,691
TUSC 963
Ind 778
Workers Party Birmingham 455
We Matter Party 379
Breakthrough Party 265
Reform UK 93
Lab 49.5%
Con 27.7%
LD 14.6%
Green 6.8%
TUSC 0.4%
Ind 0.4%
Workers Party Birmingham 0.2%
We Matter Party 0.2%
Breakthrough Party 0.1%
Reform UK 0.0%
Changes since 2018:
Lab -0.8%
Con -0.9%
LD +0.5%
Green +2.4%
TUSC +0.1%
Ind -1.4%
Others +0.0%
TUV 1 (0 diff from 2017)
Ind U (exDUP) 1 (0)
DUP 25 (-3)
Ind U (exUUP) 1 (0)
UUP 9 (-1)
AP 17 (+9)
GP 0 (-2)
PBP 1 (0)
SDLP 8 (-4)
SF (0)
It's a battle zone, they're fighters. They're not surrendering. What on earth do they expect Russia to try and do ?!?
Now there is a story in the Times that it descended into a bit of piss up, now that's a bigger problem.
Overall the infraction at best is minor, but its the cover-up and hypocrisy that gets you. If Starmer hadn't two footed on Boris and said the rules were confusing at times, it is probably true everybody broken them inadvertently at some point, however Boris behaviour was to actively encourage a culture of consistent ignoring of the rules.
It’s all daft anyway
It’s not the what but the how…
The reverberations of the Ukraine conflict are being felt across Europe’s tourism hubs as they face acute financial losses" (£)
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2022/05/07/europes-tourist-hotspots-mourn-lack-big-spending-russians/
A lot of people won't miss them though.
warspecial military operation. Neither the oligarchs nor the man on the Moscow omnibus control Putin. Freezing Russian banks out of the international payments system has blunted the Russian economy but the West is handing over $1 billion a day for Russian gas. You might have hoped that Whitehall, Washington and Brussels would have had smarter plans filed away.But it does look bad for Starmer, even if the Durham rozzers eventually give him the all-clear.
New Thread