Chris Mason of BBC says it is very, very serious for Starmer.
Starmer won't go, the Tories obviously won't push for it as if he went the pressure on Boris could be untenable
But if he did, and Boris had to go, too, that would be a win/win.
Not really.
If Johnson goes, the Conservatives have a significant problem- nobody else can plausibly hold the current Conservative coalition together and be PM. Go on- who takes over? Truss? Wallace? Hunt?
The problem exists for Labour as well, but it's much less stark, because they are choosing a LotO. And Starmer hasn't torched any potential sucessors/rivals. Besides-let's be honest, Starmer was chosen to lose with dignity in 2024, not to be the next PM. Starmer's fall helps Labour by accelerating Project Rebuild. And all the evidence is that Labour have learnt the lesson of not letting a lefty populist within a sniff of the final round. So it's not even a win for followers of the Cult of St Jeremy The Martyr.
Are we sure the party has got itself totally bomb proof from a populist Corbynite re-run?
Yes. In the unlikely event of Starmer going, he will be replaced by someone better. Like when Blair took over from Smith.
Is this a conspiracy by Corbynites and the left to discredited Starmer for his move to the centre ?
Well someone leaked it and someone must have a motive.
Is there anything untoward? It's exactly the sort of itinery everyone who works on location would get daily. How else would they do it?
Because a pre-arranged curry and booze after work would have been breaking the law at that point in time. A stupid law, but one which he supported and voted in favour of.
I can't believe this could be how it ends for Starmer. The Mail ploughing a lone furrow on a post work beer and suddenly they could have a huge scalp.
I don't know how it works for campaign staff but on film shoots you are obliged to eat before nine or you pay for an extra day and you are still obliged to feed the crew. I've never seen it done another way. It's all down on the call sheet.
I think a big mistake Starmer made was calling for resignations because of an investigation rather than at least waiting to the end of that .
The Tories will be enjoying this but ironically they don’t want Starmer to resign . We all know Johnson is utterly shameless and his right wing paper friends will do their best to spin things but if Starmer goes the first thing most of the public will ask is why is Johnson still there .
What happens if he gets more FPNs , what if the Sue Gray report is damning .
Make the point that Johnson has broken the laws he created and should resign because he lied to parliament about doing to. I always said lying to parliament was the biggie.
If we come out of this with Johnson still as PM and Starmer gone as the Met slap out a stack of FPNs and the Grey report details Johnson partying at the "I sacked Cummings" event I will likely wee myself laughing.
Sorry that's rubbish - most ordinary people dont give a chit he lied to parliament , its that he made laws for them he could not keep himself.So he should go and Starmer should go given he voted for them as well.Maybe in future it will mean politicians think twice about imposing stupid laws on people because its the "right thing to do"
I'm the only person not surprised by it but then I never took the Covid laws literally myself.
I ignored the pettifogging interpretations that I found irrational or silly, and met my parents several times outside for walks and chats.
Sure, I broke the laws. i sat on park benches with friends when that was literally (I think) illegal. Then-wife and I had a pizza in a house with another couple near the end of lockdown 1. Etc. Personally, however, I didn’t have a massive party at my home - Boris - nor did I order curry for 30 with a ton of booze and get loaded - Starmer. Nor did I, at the same time, impose stringent laws on the rest of British humanity, which I had no intention of obeying - Boris - and nor did I whine that these laws should be stricter and go on longer - Starmer - who had no intention of obeying
Fuckers. I despise them
I’d be quite happy to get rid of the entire House of Commons, as is, Tory, LD and Labour alike, and SNP, all of them, and start over
How about a Cabinet of PBers, with a Parliament of the rest?
TSE - PM Cyclefree - Home Secretary MaxPB - Chancellor BlancheLivermore - Foreign Secretary Dura Ace - Defence Casino Royale - Transport Me - Education Foxy - Health DavidL - Justice Moon rabbit - Minister for Sport Leon - Culture Eabhal - Scotland Y Bardd Cwsc - Wales Beibherli C - Northern Ireland Gallowgate - Levelling Up. Malmesbury - Leader of the House and responsible for the ONS assisted by tlg86
Just think how much better a government that would be than this one...
The only way you could make this worse would be by adding me
Yeah. Feel honoured no-one suggested me. PB is a discerning quality site after all.
Well, there's a bunch of us all here who need to be acting as the government-in-waiting just in case the chance should arise some time.
According to both BBC and RTE, in Foyle it is PBP that's been excluded following count #10, and is currently being redistributed.
SDLP is just -321 shy of quota, and would appear solid bet for 4th seat.
Leaving 5th seat a toss-up between DUP and UUP with later now -349 behind former
Yes, SDLP come fourth and (most likely) DUP fifth. Although some PBP votes, and SDLP surplus votes will transfer to the UUP, it will be nowhere near 349.
I think a big mistake Starmer made was calling for resignations because of an investigation rather than at least waiting to the end of that .
The Tories will be enjoying this but ironically they don’t want Starmer to resign . We all know Johnson is utterly shameless and his right wing paper friends will do their best to spin things but if Starmer goes the first thing most of the public will ask is why is Johnson still there .
What happens if he gets more FPNs , what if the Sue Gray report is damning .
Make the point that Johnson has broken the laws he created and should resign because he lied to parliament about doing to. I always said lying to parliament was the biggie.
If we come out of this with Johnson still as PM and Starmer gone as the Met slap out a stack of FPNs and the Grey report details Johnson partying at the "I sacked Cummings" event I will likely wee myself laughing.
Sorry that's rubbish - most ordinary people dont give a chit he lied to parliament , its that he made laws for them he could not keep himself.So he should go and Starmer should go given he voted for them as well.Maybe in future it will mean politicians think twice about imposing stupid laws on people because its the "right thing to do"
I'm the only person not surprised by it but then I never took the Covid laws literally myself.
I ignored the pettifogging interpretations that I found irrational or silly, and met my parents several times outside for walks and chats.
Sure, I broke the laws. i sat on park benches with friends when that was literally (I think) illegal. Then-wife and I had a pizza in a house with another couple near the end of lockdown 1. Etc. Personally, however, I didn’t have a massive party at my home - Boris - nor did I order curry for 30 with a ton of booze and get loaded - Starmer. Nor did I, at the same time, impose stringent laws on the rest of British humanity, which I had no intention of obeying - Boris - and nor did I whine that these laws should be stricter and go on longer - Starmer - who had no intention of obeying
Fuckers. I despise them
I’d be quite happy to get rid of the entire House of Commons, as is, Tory, LD and Labour alike, and SNP, all of them, and start over
How about a Cabinet of PBers, with a Parliament of the rest?
TSE - PM Cyclefree - Home Secretary MaxPB - Chancellor BlancheLivermore - Foreign Secretary Dura Ace - Defence Casino Royale - Transport Me - Education Foxy - Health DavidL - Justice Moon rabbit - Minister for Sport Leon - Culture Eabhal - Scotland Y Bardd Cwsc - Wales Beibherli C - Northern Ireland Gallowgate - Levelling Up. Malmesbury - Leader of the House and responsible for the ONS assisted by tlg86
Just think how much better a government that would be than this one...
What’s the betting on first one out 😆
@ydoethur’s cabinet is far too left-wind and middle class. Here’s mine:
PM - me (well, someone has to do it) For Sec - Leon CoE - Bartholomew Robert’s Equalities / Home Sec - Cyclefree SOS for the Dominions, sorry devolved Parliaments - HYFUD Culture - Leon BEIS - RCS Health - Foxy (he is the most qualified) Defence - Topping (Dura would give in to Russia) Education - Malmesbury Deregulation - State_Go_Away DEFRA - Tlg86 Justice - DavidL
Okay PM. How do we make everyone feel respected and listened to?
Appoint you as PB Minister Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary for Far-Outreach
Chris Mason of BBC says it is very, very serious for Starmer.
Starmer won't go, the Tories obviously won't push for it as if he went the pressure on Boris could be untenable
But if he did, and Boris had to go, too, that would be a win/win.
Not really.
If Johnson goes, the Conservatives have a significant problem- nobody else can plausibly hold the current Conservative coalition together and be PM. Go on- who takes over? Truss? Wallace? Hunt?
The problem exists for Labour as well, but it's much less stark, because they are choosing a LotO. And Starmer hasn't torched any potential sucessors/rivals. Besides-let's be honest, Starmer was chosen to lose with dignity in 2024, not to be the next PM. Starmer's fall helps Labour by accelerating Project Rebuild. And all the evidence is that Labour have learnt the lesson of not letting a lefty populist within a sniff of the final round. So it's not even a win for followers of the Cult of St Jeremy The Martyr.
Are we sure the party has got itself totally bomb proof from a populist Corbynite re-run?
Yes. In the unlikely event of Starmer going, he will be replaced by someone better. Like when Blair took over from Smith.
Is this a conspiracy by Corbynites and the left to discredited Starmer for his move to the centre ?
Well someone leaked it and someone must have a motive.
Is there anything untoward? It's exactly the sort of itinery everyone who works on location would get daily. How else would they do it?
Because a pre-arranged curry and booze after work would have been breaking the law at that point in time. A stupid law, but one which he supported and voted in favour of.
I can't believe this could be how it ends for Starmer. The Mail ploughing a lone furrow on a post work beer and suddenly they could have a huge scalp.
I don't know how it works for campaign staff but on film shoots you are obliged to eat before nine or you pay for an extra day and you are still obliged to feed the crew. I've never seen it done another way. It's all down on the call sheet.
Not even close to the same as a film crew. Any staff will be on salary and anyone else is a volunteer.
According to many reports, Russian 64th separated motorized brigade, responsible for mass rape, torture and executions in Bucha, promoted by Putin to a Guard brigade, was completely destroyed at Izyum, Kharkiv region. I will not publish my emotions here.
Was it deliberately posted to the most dangerous area?
According to many reports, Russian 64th separated motorized brigade, responsible for mass rape, torture and executions in Bucha, promoted by Putin to a Guard brigade, was completely destroyed at Izyum, Kharkiv region. I will not publish my emotions here.
Chris Mason of BBC says it is very, very serious for Starmer.
Starmer won't go, the Tories obviously won't push for it as if he went the pressure on Boris could be untenable
But if he did, and Boris had to go, too, that would be a win/win.
Not really.
If Johnson goes, the Conservatives have a significant problem- nobody else can plausibly hold the current Conservative coalition together and be PM. Go on- who takes over? Truss? Wallace? Hunt?
The problem exists for Labour as well, but it's much less stark, because they are choosing a LotO. And Starmer hasn't torched any potential sucessors/rivals. Besides-let's be honest, Starmer was chosen to lose with dignity in 2024, not to be the next PM. Starmer's fall helps Labour by accelerating Project Rebuild. And all the evidence is that Labour have learnt the lesson of not letting a lefty populist within a sniff of the final round. So it's not even a win for followers of the Cult of St Jeremy The Martyr.
Are we sure the party has got itself totally bomb proof from a populist Corbynite re-run?
Yes. In the unlikely event of Starmer going, he will be replaced by someone better. Like when Blair took over from Smith.
Is this a conspiracy by Corbynites and the left to discredited Starmer for his move to the centre ?
Well someone leaked it and someone must have a motive.
Is there anything untoward? It's exactly the sort of itinery everyone who works on location would get daily. How else would they do it?
Because a pre-arranged curry and booze after work would have been breaking the law at that point in time. A stupid law, but one which he supported and voted in favour of.
I can't believe this could be how it ends for Starmer. The Mail ploughing a lone furrow on a post work beer and suddenly they could have a huge scalp.
I don't know how it works for campaign staff but on film shoots you are obliged to eat before nine or you pay for an extra day and you are still obliged to feed the crew. I've never seen it done another way. It's all down on the call sheet.
Not even close to the same as a film crew. Any staff will be on salary and anyone else is a volunteer.
I’ve never been on a campaign.
But my assumption was that this is effectively the same as a late night IT shift, ie you kind of have to bring in the pizza (or curry) as part of the deal.
I have never seen this as a “party”, but effectively part of the work itself.
But I now await full clarity. Keir is at best incompetent for letting this story roll on.
I think a big mistake Starmer made was calling for resignations because of an investigation rather than at least waiting to the end of that .
The Tories will be enjoying this but ironically they don’t want Starmer to resign . We all know Johnson is utterly shameless and his right wing paper friends will do their best to spin things but if Starmer goes the first thing most of the public will ask is why is Johnson still there .
What happens if he gets more FPNs , what if the Sue Gray report is damning .
Make the point that Johnson has broken the laws he created and should resign because he lied to parliament about doing to. I always said lying to parliament was the biggie.
If we come out of this with Johnson still as PM and Starmer gone as the Met slap out a stack of FPNs and the Grey report details Johnson partying at the "I sacked Cummings" event I will likely wee myself laughing.
Sorry that's rubbish - most ordinary people dont give a chit he lied to parliament , its that he made laws for them he could not keep himself.So he should go and Starmer should go given he voted for them as well.Maybe in future it will mean politicians think twice about imposing stupid laws on people because its the "right thing to do"
I'm the only person not surprised by it but then I never took the Covid laws literally myself.
I ignored the pettifogging interpretations that I found irrational or silly, and met my parents several times outside for walks and chats.
Sure, I broke the laws. i sat on park benches with friends when that was literally (I think) illegal. Then-wife and I had a pizza in a house with another couple near the end of lockdown 1. Etc. Personally, however, I didn’t have a massive party at my home - Boris - nor did I order curry for 30 with a ton of booze and get loaded - Starmer. Nor did I, at the same time, impose stringent laws on the rest of British humanity, which I had no intention of obeying - Boris - and nor did I whine that these laws should be stricter and go on longer - Starmer - who had no intention of obeying
Fuckers. I despise them
I’d be quite happy to get rid of the entire House of Commons, as is, Tory, LD and Labour alike, and SNP, all of them, and start over
How about a Cabinet of PBers, with a Parliament of the rest?
TSE - PM Cyclefree - Home Secretary MaxPB - Chancellor BlancheLivermore - Foreign Secretary Dura Ace - Defence Casino Royale - Transport Me - Education Foxy - Health DavidL - Justice Moon rabbit - Minister for Sport Leon - Culture Eabhal - Scotland Y Bardd Cwsc - Wales Beibherli C - Northern Ireland Gallowgate - Levelling Up. Malmesbury - Leader of the House and responsible for the ONS assisted by tlg86
Just think how much better a government that would be than this one...
The only way you could make this worse would be by adding me
Yeah. Feel honoured no-one suggested me. PB is a discerning quality site after all.
I think that would be a disaster of a cabinet. Everyone on their own hobbyhorse, and no coherence.
Chris Mason of BBC says it is very, very serious for Starmer.
Starmer won't go, the Tories obviously won't push for it as if he went the pressure on Boris could be untenable
But if he did, and Boris had to go, too, that would be a win/win.
Not really.
If Johnson goes, the Conservatives have a significant problem- nobody else can plausibly hold the current Conservative coalition together and be PM. Go on- who takes over? Truss? Wallace? Hunt?
The problem exists for Labour as well, but it's much less stark, because they are choosing a LotO. And Starmer hasn't torched any potential sucessors/rivals. Besides-let's be honest, Starmer was chosen to lose with dignity in 2024, not to be the next PM. Starmer's fall helps Labour by accelerating Project Rebuild. And all the evidence is that Labour have learnt the lesson of not letting a lefty populist within a sniff of the final round. So it's not even a win for followers of the Cult of St Jeremy The Martyr.
Are we sure the party has got itself totally bomb proof from a populist Corbynite re-run?
Yes. In the unlikely event of Starmer going, he will be replaced by someone better. Like when Blair took over from Smith.
I think a big mistake Starmer made was calling for resignations because of an investigation rather than at least waiting to the end of that .
The Tories will be enjoying this but ironically they don’t want Starmer to resign . We all know Johnson is utterly shameless and his right wing paper friends will do their best to spin things but if Starmer goes the first thing most of the public will ask is why is Johnson still there .
What happens if he gets more FPNs , what if the Sue Gray report is damning .
Make the point that Johnson has broken the laws he created and should resign because he lied to parliament about doing to. I always said lying to parliament was the biggie.
If we come out of this with Johnson still as PM and Starmer gone as the Met slap out a stack of FPNs and the Grey report details Johnson partying at the "I sacked Cummings" event I will likely wee myself laughing.
Sorry that's rubbish - most ordinary people dont give a chit he lied to parliament , its that he made laws for them he could not keep himself.So he should go and Starmer should go given he voted for them as well.Maybe in future it will mean politicians think twice about imposing stupid laws on people because its the "right thing to do"
I'm the only person not surprised by it but then I never took the Covid laws literally myself.
I ignored the pettifogging interpretations that I found irrational or silly, and met my parents several times outside for walks and chats.
Sure, I broke the laws. i sat on park benches with friends when that was literally (I think) illegal. Then-wife and I had a pizza in a house with another couple near the end of lockdown 1. Etc. Personally, however, I didn’t have a massive party at my home - Boris - nor did I order curry for 30 with a ton of booze and get loaded - Starmer. Nor did I, at the same time, impose stringent laws on the rest of British humanity, which I had no intention of obeying - Boris - and nor did I whine that these laws should be stricter and go on longer - Starmer - who had no intention of obeying
Fuckers. I despise them
I’d be quite happy to get rid of the entire House of Commons, as is, Tory, LD and Labour alike, and SNP, all of them, and start over
How about a Cabinet of PBers, with a Parliament of the rest?
TSE - PM Cyclefree - Home Secretary MaxPB - Chancellor BlancheLivermore - Foreign Secretary Dura Ace - Defence Casino Royale - Transport Me - Education Foxy - Health DavidL - Justice Moon rabbit - Minister for Sport Leon - Culture Eabhal - Scotland Y Bardd Cwsc - Wales Beibherli C - Northern Ireland Gallowgate - Levelling Up. Malmesbury - Leader of the House and responsible for the ONS assisted by tlg86
Just think how much better a government that would be than this one...
What’s the betting on first one out 😆
@ydoethur’s cabinet is far too left-wind and middle class. Here’s mine:
PM - me (well, someone has to do it) For Sec - Leon CoE - Bartholomew Robert’s Equalities / Home Sec - Cyclefree SOS for the Dominions, sorry devolved Parliaments - HYFUD Culture - Leon BEIS - RCS Health - Foxy (he is the most qualified) Defence - Topping (Dura would give in to Russia) Education - Malmesbury Deregulation - State_Go_Away DEFRA - Tlg86 Justice - DavidL
Okay PM. How do we make everyone feel respected and listened to?
Sorry, missed that one
Levelling up / Communities Sec / Northern Powerhouse - @Roger
According to many reports, Russian 64th separated motorized brigade, responsible for mass rape, torture and executions in Bucha, promoted by Putin to a Guard brigade, was completely destroyed at Izyum, Kharkiv region. I will not publish my emotions here.
Was it deliberately posted to the most dangerous area?
Chris Mason of BBC says it is very, very serious for Starmer.
Starmer won't go, the Tories obviously won't push for it as if he went the pressure on Boris could be untenable
But if he did, and Boris had to go, too, that would be a win/win.
Not really.
If Johnson goes, the Conservatives have a significant problem- nobody else can plausibly hold the current Conservative coalition together and be PM. Go on- who takes over? Truss? Wallace? Hunt?
The problem exists for Labour as well, but it's much less stark, because they are choosing a LotO. And Starmer hasn't torched any potential sucessors/rivals. Besides-let's be honest, Starmer was chosen to lose with dignity in 2024, not to be the next PM. Starmer's fall helps Labour by accelerating Project Rebuild. And all the evidence is that Labour have learnt the lesson of not letting a lefty populist within a sniff of the final round. So it's not even a win for followers of the Cult of St Jeremy The Martyr.
Are we sure the party has got itself totally bomb proof from a populist Corbynite re-run?
Yes. In the unlikely event of Starmer going, he will be replaced by someone better. Like when Blair took over from Smith.
Is this a conspiracy by Corbynites and the left to discredited Starmer for his move to the centre ?
Well someone leaked it and someone must have a motive.
Is there anything untoward? It's exactly the sort of itinery everyone who works on location would get daily. How else would they do it?
Because a pre-arranged curry and booze after work would have been breaking the law at that point in time. A stupid law, but one which he supported and voted in favour of.
I can't believe this could be how it ends for Starmer. The Mail ploughing a lone furrow on a post work beer and suddenly they could have a huge scalp.
I don't know how it works for campaign staff but on film shoots you are obliged to eat before nine or you pay for an extra day and you are still obliged to feed the crew. I've never seen it done another way. It's all down on the call sheet.
Not even close to the same as a film crew. Any staff will be on salary and anyone else is a volunteer.
I’ve never been on a campaign.
But my assumption was that this is effectively the same as a late night IT shift, ie you kind of have to bring in the pizza (or curry) as part of the deal.
I have never seen this as a “party”, but effectively part of the work itself.
But I now await full clarity. Keir is at best incompetent for letting this story roll on.
SKS knows he is screwed and is now looking around for any old desperate excuse. He’s fucked.
I think a big mistake Starmer made was calling for resignations because of an investigation rather than at least waiting to the end of that .
The Tories will be enjoying this but ironically they don’t want Starmer to resign . We all know Johnson is utterly shameless and his right wing paper friends will do their best to spin things but if Starmer goes the first thing most of the public will ask is why is Johnson still there .
What happens if he gets more FPNs , what if the Sue Gray report is damning .
Make the point that Johnson has broken the laws he created and should resign because he lied to parliament about doing to. I always said lying to parliament was the biggie.
If we come out of this with Johnson still as PM and Starmer gone as the Met slap out a stack of FPNs and the Grey report details Johnson partying at the "I sacked Cummings" event I will likely wee myself laughing.
Sorry that's rubbish - most ordinary people dont give a chit he lied to parliament , its that he made laws for them he could not keep himself.So he should go and Starmer should go given he voted for them as well.Maybe in future it will mean politicians think twice about imposing stupid laws on people because its the "right thing to do"
I'm the only person not surprised by it but then I never took the Covid laws literally myself.
I ignored the pettifogging interpretations that I found irrational or silly, and met my parents several times outside for walks and chats.
Sure, I broke the laws. i sat on park benches with friends when that was literally (I think) illegal. Then-wife and I had a pizza in a house with another couple near the end of lockdown 1. Etc. Personally, however, I didn’t have a massive party at my home - Boris - nor did I order curry for 30 with a ton of booze and get loaded - Starmer. Nor did I, at the same time, impose stringent laws on the rest of British humanity, which I had no intention of obeying - Boris - and nor did I whine that these laws should be stricter and go on longer - Starmer - who had no intention of obeying
Fuckers. I despise them
I’d be quite happy to get rid of the entire House of Commons, as is, Tory, LD and Labour alike, and SNP, all of them, and start over
How about a Cabinet of PBers, with a Parliament of the rest?
TSE - PM Cyclefree - Home Secretary MaxPB - Chancellor BlancheLivermore - Foreign Secretary Dura Ace - Defence Casino Royale - Transport Me - Education Foxy - Health DavidL - Justice Moon rabbit - Minister for Sport Leon - Culture Eabhal - Scotland Y Bardd Cwsc - Wales Beibherli C - Northern Ireland Gallowgate - Levelling Up. Malmesbury - Leader of the House and responsible for the ONS assisted by tlg86
Just think how much better a government that would be than this one...
The only way you could make this worse would be by adding me
Yeah. Feel honoured no-one suggested me. PB is a discerning quality site after all.
Any cabinet without you and kle4 in would be frankly dreadful.
I didn't see anyone claiming head of state, though. I tried to suggest Garden Walker for that a few days ago but there were no takers. So, reluctantly, I shall wear the crown.
Kneel, peasants.
Surely suggesting anyone other than OGH (with RCS as crown prince) should rule o'er PB, is ipso facto (& prima facie) lèse-majesté!
Chris Mason of BBC says it is very, very serious for Starmer.
Starmer won't go, the Tories obviously won't push for it as if he went the pressure on Boris could be untenable
But if he did, and Boris had to go, too, that would be a win/win.
Not really.
If Johnson goes, the Conservatives have a significant problem- nobody else can plausibly hold the current Conservative coalition together and be PM. Go on- who takes over? Truss? Wallace? Hunt?
The problem exists for Labour as well, but it's much less stark, because they are choosing a LotO. And Starmer hasn't torched any potential sucessors/rivals. Besides-let's be honest, Starmer was chosen to lose with dignity in 2024, not to be the next PM. Starmer's fall helps Labour by accelerating Project Rebuild. And all the evidence is that Labour have learnt the lesson of not letting a lefty populist within a sniff of the final round. So it's not even a win for followers of the Cult of St Jeremy The Martyr.
Are we sure the party has got itself totally bomb proof from a populist Corbynite re-run?
Yes. In the unlikely event of Starmer going, he will be replaced by someone better. Like when Blair took over from Smith.
The only alternative leader in the Shadow Cabinet who might do better than Starmer is Wes Streeting, the rest would probably do worse
Is this a conspiracy by Corbynites and the left to discredited Starmer for his move to the centre ?
Well someone leaked it and someone must have a motive.
Is there anything untoward? It's exactly the sort of itinery everyone who works on location would get daily. How else would they do it?
What labour should really worry about is who is leaking this and their motive
I have already suggested this could be a reaction from Corbynites and the left in response to Starmer's move to the centre
The could just have much wide implications for labour
It’s all very cloak and dagger . I suspect Starmer will be gone soon which personally I feel is a shame .
It smells like a story cooked up in Tory HQ, eagerly promoted by Tory-friendly media, and now the Labour far left are joining in.
Not a crowd I’d personally like any part of.
Some Corbyn fans would rather see Labour lose a GE than have the non pure Starmer win. It really pisses me off when some in Labour won’t accept the imperfect but bearable because unless any leader has passes the left purity test they’d rather just watch the Tories destroy the country .
I think a big mistake Starmer made was calling for resignations because of an investigation rather than at least waiting to the end of that .
The Tories will be enjoying this but ironically they don’t want Starmer to resign . We all know Johnson is utterly shameless and his right wing paper friends will do their best to spin things but if Starmer goes the first thing most of the public will ask is why is Johnson still there .
What happens if he gets more FPNs , what if the Sue Gray report is damning .
Make the point that Johnson has broken the laws he created and should resign because he lied to parliament about doing to. I always said lying to parliament was the biggie.
If we come out of this with Johnson still as PM and Starmer gone as the Met slap out a stack of FPNs and the Grey report details Johnson partying at the "I sacked Cummings" event I will likely wee myself laughing.
Sorry that's rubbish - most ordinary people dont give a chit he lied to parliament , its that he made laws for them he could not keep himself.So he should go and Starmer should go given he voted for them as well.Maybe in future it will mean politicians think twice about imposing stupid laws on people because its the "right thing to do"
I'm the only person not surprised by it but then I never took the Covid laws literally myself.
I ignored the pettifogging interpretations that I found irrational or silly, and met my parents several times outside for walks and chats.
Sure, I broke the laws. i sat on park benches with friends when that was literally (I think) illegal. Then-wife and I had a pizza in a house with another couple near the end of lockdown 1. Etc. Personally, however, I didn’t have a massive party at my home - Boris - nor did I order curry for 30 with a ton of booze and get loaded - Starmer. Nor did I, at the same time, impose stringent laws on the rest of British humanity, which I had no intention of obeying - Boris - and nor did I whine that these laws should be stricter and go on longer - Starmer - who had no intention of obeying
Fuckers. I despise them
I’d be quite happy to get rid of the entire House of Commons, as is, Tory, LD and Labour alike, and SNP, all of them, and start over
How about a Cabinet of PBers, with a Parliament of the rest?
TSE - PM Cyclefree - Home Secretary MaxPB - Chancellor BlancheLivermore - Foreign Secretary Dura Ace - Defence Casino Royale - Transport Me - Education Foxy - Health DavidL - Justice Moon rabbit - Minister for Sport Leon - Culture Eabhal - Scotland Y Bardd Cwsc - Wales Beibherli C - Northern Ireland Gallowgate - Levelling Up. Malmesbury - Leader of the House and responsible for the ONS assisted by tlg86
Just think how much better a government that would be than this one...
The only way you could make this worse would be by adding me
Yeah. Feel honoured no-one suggested me. PB is a discerning quality site after all.
Any cabinet without you and kle4 in would be frankly dreadful.
I didn't see anyone claiming head of state, though. I tried to suggest Garden Walker for that a few days ago but there were no takers. So, reluctantly, I shall wear the crown.
Kneel, peasants.
Surely suggesting anyone other than OGH (with RCS as crown prince) should rule o'er PB, is ipso facto (& prima facie) lèse-majesté!
Flattered by the offer, but I’m afraid my first act would be to fire several posters on here.
He's committed a cardinal sin. Being a plausible Labour PM. However. He isn't very good. Boris is a tactical political savant unmatched. Unfortunately, I fear he's also a strategic buffoon. I held no truck with the idea we were headed for a '97 before this weekend. No I'm not so sure. It may not happen next time, but Big Dog is leading the Tories into the wilderness for a generation. There is no suggestion that the fact that they've lost 1 in 5 councillors has even been cause for a moments reflection. Just destroy the prevailing threat as it presents. Just like Sunak. Meanwhile, your own popularity just falls. Because it can't actually just be that you might possibly be at all inadequate.
Johnson cares not a jot what happens to anyone else including tory councillors.
Or even tory ex-councillors. Of whom I know a few; must write to them.
But the golden rule of Alex de Pfeffel is what it has always been. If you have dealings with him, you will eventually regret it. It's just a matter of time.
I wonder how many of these ex-councillors were only a few months ago at conference whooping and cheering with joy at the sight of their beloved leader?
Is this a conspiracy by Corbynites and the left to discredited Starmer for his move to the centre ?
Well someone leaked it and someone must have a motive.
Is there anything untoward? It's exactly the sort of itinery everyone who works on location would get daily. How else would they do it?
What labour should really worry about is who is leaking this and their motive
I have already suggested this could be a reaction from Corbynites and the left in response to Starmer's move to the centre
The could just have much wide implications for labour
It’s all very cloak and dagger . I suspect Starmer will be gone soon which personally I feel is a shame .
It smells like a story cooked up in Tory HQ, eagerly promoted by Tory-friendly media, and now the Labour far left are joining in.
Not a crowd I’d personally like any part of.
And the danger is that the various witches around the cauldron have different aims. Some want to weaken Starmer, whilst leaving him in place. Some want to bring down Starmer. Some want to bring down Starmer and Johnson. Some don't care, as long as there is talkability.
There is a dabbling with forces that aren't properly understood. This could easily end badly.
Chris Mason of BBC says it is very, very serious for Starmer.
Starmer won't go, the Tories obviously won't push for it as if he went the pressure on Boris could be untenable
But if he did, and Boris had to go, too, that would be a win/win.
Not really.
If Johnson goes, the Conservatives have a significant problem- nobody else can plausibly hold the current Conservative coalition together and be PM. Go on- who takes over? Truss? Wallace? Hunt?
The problem exists for Labour as well, but it's much less stark, because they are choosing a LotO. And Starmer hasn't torched any potential sucessors/rivals. Besides-let's be honest, Starmer was chosen to lose with dignity in 2024, not to be the next PM. Starmer's fall helps Labour by accelerating Project Rebuild. And all the evidence is that Labour have learnt the lesson of not letting a lefty populist within a sniff of the final round. So it's not even a win for followers of the Cult of St Jeremy The Martyr.
Are we sure the party has got itself totally bomb proof from a populist Corbynite re-run?
Yes. In the unlikely event of Starmer going, he will be replaced by someone better. Like when Blair took over from Smith.
Is this a conspiracy by Corbynites and the left to discredited Starmer for his move to the centre ?
Well someone leaked it and someone must have a motive.
http://marchonfilm.com/call-sheets/ Is there anything untoward? It's exactly the sort of itinery everyone who works on location would get daily. How else would they do it?
Because a pre-arranged curry and booze after work would have been breaking the law at that point in time. A stupid law, but one which he supported and voted in favour of.
I can't believe this could be how it ends for Starmer. The Mail ploughing a lone furrow on a post work beer and suddenly they could have a huge scalp.
I don't know how it works for campaign staff but on film shoots you are obliged to eat before nine or you pay for an extra day and you are still obliged to feed the crew. I've never seen it done another way. It's all down on the call sheet.
Not even close to the same as a film crew. Any staff will be on salary and anyone else is a volunteer.
I don't see how you can organise it otherwise. Here is an example of a call sheet. There would be no way of organising 30 or 40 people without one. Everyone gets a print off and they're usually several pasges long
Chris Mason of BBC says it is very, very serious for Starmer.
Starmer won't go, the Tories obviously won't push for it as if he went the pressure on Boris could be untenable
But if he did, and Boris had to go, too, that would be a win/win.
Not really.
If Johnson goes, the Conservatives have a significant problem- nobody else can plausibly hold the current Conservative coalition together and be PM. Go on- who takes over? Truss? Wallace? Hunt?
The problem exists for Labour as well, but it's much less stark, because they are choosing a LotO. And Starmer hasn't torched any potential sucessors/rivals. Besides-let's be honest, Starmer was chosen to lose with dignity in 2024, not to be the next PM. Starmer's fall helps Labour by accelerating Project Rebuild. And all the evidence is that Labour have learnt the lesson of not letting a lefty populist within a sniff of the final round. So it's not even a win for followers of the Cult of St Jeremy The Martyr.
Are we sure the party has got itself totally bomb proof from a populist Corbynite re-run?
Yes. In the unlikely event of Starmer going, he will be replaced by someone better. Like when Blair took over from Smith.
Is this a conspiracy by Corbynites and the left to discredited Starmer for his move to the centre ?
Well someone leaked it and someone must have a motive.
Is there anything untoward? It's exactly the sort of itinery everyone who works on location would get daily. How else would they do it?
Because a pre-arranged curry and booze after work would have been breaking the law at that point in time. A stupid law, but one which he supported and voted in favour of.
I can't believe this could be how it ends for Starmer. The Mail ploughing a lone furrow on a post work beer and suddenly they could have a huge scalp.
I don't know how it works for campaign staff but on film shoots you are obliged to eat before nine or you pay for an extra day and you are still obliged to feed the crew. I've never seen it done another way. It's all down on the call sheet.
Not even close to the same as a film crew. Any staff will be on salary and anyone else is a volunteer.
I’ve never been on a campaign.
But my assumption was that this is effectively the same as a late night IT shift, ie you kind of have to bring in the pizza (or curry) as part of the deal.
I have never seen this as a “party”, but effectively part of the work itself.
But I now await full clarity. Keir is at best incompetent for letting this story roll on.
SKS knows he is screwed and is now looking around for any old desperate excuse. He’s fucked.
I have not followed this scrupulously, not least because the main sources seem to have been partisan shit-stirrers, but it certainly seems true that Keir can’t get his story straight.
I thought Starmer would be fine, now we have Roger saying no problem at all because its like that on films sets.....Starmer now gone by the summer odds on.
He's committed a cardinal sin. Being a plausible Labour PM. However. He isn't very good. Boris is a tactical political savant unmatched. Unfortunately, I fear he's also a strategic buffoon. I held no truck with the idea we were headed for a '97 before this weekend. No I'm not so sure. It may not happen next time, but Big Dog is leading the Tories into the wilderness for a generation. There is no suggestion that the fact that they've lost 1 in 5 councillors has even been cause for a moments reflection. Just destroy the prevailing threat as it presents. Just like Sunak. Meanwhile, your own popularity just falls. Because it can't actually just be that you might possibly be at all inadequate.
Johnson cares not a jot what happens to anyone else including tory councillors.
Or even tory ex-councillors. Of whom I know a few; must write to them.
But the golden rule of Alex de Pfeffel is what it has always been. If you have dealings with him, you will eventually regret it. It's just a matter of time.
I wonder how many of these ex-councillors were only a few months ago at conference whooping and cheering with joy at the sight of their beloved leader?
The roar of the greasepaint, the smell of the crowd!
I think a big mistake Starmer made was calling for resignations because of an investigation rather than at least waiting to the end of that .
The Tories will be enjoying this but ironically they don’t want Starmer to resign . We all know Johnson is utterly shameless and his right wing paper friends will do their best to spin things but if Starmer goes the first thing most of the public will ask is why is Johnson still there .
What happens if he gets more FPNs , what if the Sue Gray report is damning .
Make the point that Johnson has broken the laws he created and should resign because he lied to parliament about doing to. I always said lying to parliament was the biggie.
If we come out of this with Johnson still as PM and Starmer gone as the Met slap out a stack of FPNs and the Grey report details Johnson partying at the "I sacked Cummings" event I will likely wee myself laughing.
Sorry that's rubbish - most ordinary people dont give a chit he lied to parliament , its that he made laws for them he could not keep himself.So he should go and Starmer should go given he voted for them as well.Maybe in future it will mean politicians think twice about imposing stupid laws on people because its the "right thing to do"
I'm the only person not surprised by it but then I never took the Covid laws literally myself.
I ignored the pettifogging interpretations that I found irrational or silly, and met my parents several times outside for walks and chats.
Sure, I broke the laws. i sat on park benches with friends when that was literally (I think) illegal. Then-wife and I had a pizza in a house with another couple near the end of lockdown 1. Etc. Personally, however, I didn’t have a massive party at my home - Boris - nor did I order curry for 30 with a ton of booze and get loaded - Starmer. Nor did I, at the same time, impose stringent laws on the rest of British humanity, which I had no intention of obeying - Boris - and nor did I whine that these laws should be stricter and go on longer - Starmer - who had no intention of obeying
Fuckers. I despise them
I’d be quite happy to get rid of the entire House of Commons, as is, Tory, LD and Labour alike, and SNP, all of them, and start over
How about a Cabinet of PBers, with a Parliament of the rest?
TSE - PM Cyclefree - Home Secretary MaxPB - Chancellor BlancheLivermore - Foreign Secretary Dura Ace - Defence Casino Royale - Transport Me - Education Foxy - Health DavidL - Justice Moon rabbit - Minister for Sport Leon - Culture Eabhal - Scotland Y Bardd Cwsc - Wales Beibherli C - Northern Ireland Gallowgate - Levelling Up. Malmesbury - Leader of the House and responsible for the ONS assisted by tlg86
Just think how much better a government that would be than this one...
The only way you could make this worse would be by adding me
Yeah. Feel honoured no-one suggested me. PB is a discerning quality site after all.
I think that would be a disaster of a cabinet. Everyone on their own hobbyhorse, and no coherence.
It's the job of the PM to ensure that. What's needed is a true leader. Someone inspiring and dynamic, with grand vision and cutting insight, a keen analytical intellect and inherent charisma to bring people together and get the most out of them, selfless and humble, but confident and compelling.
I think a big mistake Starmer made was calling for resignations because of an investigation rather than at least waiting to the end of that .
The Tories will be enjoying this but ironically they don’t want Starmer to resign . We all know Johnson is utterly shameless and his right wing paper friends will do their best to spin things but if Starmer goes the first thing most of the public will ask is why is Johnson still there .
What happens if he gets more FPNs , what if the Sue Gray report is damning .
Make the point that Johnson has broken the laws he created and should resign because he lied to parliament about doing to. I always said lying to parliament was the biggie.
If we come out of this with Johnson still as PM and Starmer gone as the Met slap out a stack of FPNs and the Grey report details Johnson partying at the "I sacked Cummings" event I will likely wee myself laughing.
Sorry that's rubbish - most ordinary people dont give a chit he lied to parliament , its that he made laws for them he could not keep himself.So he should go and Starmer should go given he voted for them as well.Maybe in future it will mean politicians think twice about imposing stupid laws on people because its the "right thing to do"
I'm the only person not surprised by it but then I never took the Covid laws literally myself.
I ignored the pettifogging interpretations that I found irrational or silly, and met my parents several times outside for walks and chats.
Sure, I broke the laws. i sat on park benches with friends when that was literally (I think) illegal. Then-wife and I had a pizza in a house with another couple near the end of lockdown 1. Etc. Personally, however, I didn’t have a massive party at my home - Boris - nor did I order curry for 30 with a ton of booze and get loaded - Starmer. Nor did I, at the same time, impose stringent laws on the rest of British humanity, which I had no intention of obeying - Boris - and nor did I whine that these laws should be stricter and go on longer - Starmer - who had no intention of obeying
Fuckers. I despise them
I’d be quite happy to get rid of the entire House of Commons, as is, Tory, LD and Labour alike, and SNP, all of them, and start over
How about a Cabinet of PBers, with a Parliament of the rest?
TSE - PM Cyclefree - Home Secretary MaxPB - Chancellor BlancheLivermore - Foreign Secretary Dura Ace - Defence Casino Royale - Transport Me - Education Foxy - Health DavidL - Justice Moon rabbit - Minister for Sport Leon - Culture Eabhal - Scotland Y Bardd Cwsc - Wales Beibherli C - Northern Ireland Gallowgate - Levelling Up. Malmesbury - Leader of the House and responsible for the ONS assisted by tlg86
Just think how much better a government that would be than this one...
The only way you could make this worse would be by adding me
Yeah. Feel honoured no-one suggested me. PB is a discerning quality site after all.
Any cabinet without you and kle4 in would be frankly dreadful.
I didn't see anyone claiming head of state, though. I tried to suggest Garden Walker for that a few days ago but there were no takers. So, reluctantly, I shall wear the crown.
Kneel, peasants.
Surely suggesting anyone other than OGH (with RCS as crown prince) should rule o'er PB, is ipso facto (& prima facie) lèse-majesté!
Flattered by the offer, but I’m afraid my first act would be to fire several posters on here.
A constitutional crisis. Best viewed from New York.
He's committed a cardinal sin. Being a plausible Labour PM. However. He isn't very good. Boris is a tactical political savant unmatched. Unfortunately, I fear he's also a strategic buffoon. I held no truck with the idea we were headed for a '97 before this weekend. No I'm not so sure. It may not happen next time, but Big Dog is leading the Tories into the wilderness for a generation. There is no suggestion that the fact that they've lost 1 in 5 councillors has even been cause for a moments reflection. Just destroy the prevailing threat as it presents. Just like Sunak. Meanwhile, his own popularity just falls. Because it can't actually just be that he might possibly be at all inadequate.
This is the correct analysis.
Hubris (along with corruption, incompetence and deceit) has overtaken the Tories.
I see a tweet was issued by Keir Starmer at 10:13pm of the night in question, including photos from his campaign visit. So *somebody* was working.
If you remember back to The Player, when he’s walking away from the police station, the police watching him from the window suspecting he’s guilty, but they didn’t have the evidence. The clear difference between the beergate and cake party is the difference in evidence. The government paid a photographer to prove to the police they had stopped work for a bit of socialising. The police will never have that in the Starmer case. He’ll get exonerated, a boost from the exoneration, and the story will be dead of any use in future.
You only have to read the story on front the Sunday Times to see how Starmer gets off. Beneath the juicy headline which draws you in, the star witness for the LOTOcide says some people didn’t work through the event, they just socialised. That means some did. And on even the ones who didn’t, the police will ask the witness, do you have any evidence to prove your claim against those who didn’t?
The people who we know really partied in lockdown in Downing Street were civil servants and SPADS. What Boris and Sunak done at the cake eating is not worthy of a Fixed penalty notice, they ended up with one for two reasons, media reveal the actual proper parties drew a wide ranging investigation into what had gone on, and they hired a photographer to give the police perfect evidence for the FPN they got.
Chris Mason of BBC says it is very, very serious for Starmer.
Starmer won't go, the Tories obviously won't push for it as if he went the pressure on Boris could be untenable
But if he did, and Boris had to go, too, that would be a win/win.
Not really.
If Johnson goes, the Conservatives have a significant problem- nobody else can plausibly hold the current Conservative coalition together and be PM. Go on- who takes over? Truss? Wallace? Hunt?
The problem exists for Labour as well, but it's much less stark, because they are choosing a LotO. And Starmer hasn't torched any potential sucessors/rivals. Besides-let's be honest, Starmer was chosen to lose with dignity in 2024, not to be the next PM. Starmer's fall helps Labour by accelerating Project Rebuild. And all the evidence is that Labour have learnt the lesson of not letting a lefty populist within a sniff of the final round. So it's not even a win for followers of the Cult of St Jeremy The Martyr.
Are we sure the party has got itself totally bomb proof from a populist Corbynite re-run?
Yes. In the unlikely event of Starmer going, he will be replaced by someone better. Like when Blair took over from Smith.
Is this a conspiracy by Corbynites and the left to discredited Starmer for his move to the centre ?
Well someone leaked it and someone must have a motive.
Is there anything untoward? It's exactly the sort of itinery everyone who works on location would get daily. How else would they do it?
Because a pre-arranged curry and booze after work would have been breaking the law at that point in time. A stupid law, but one which he supported and voted in favour of.
I can't believe this could be how it ends for Starmer. The Mail ploughing a lone furrow on a post work beer and suddenly they could have a huge scalp.
I don't know how it works for campaign staff but on film shoots you are obliged to eat before nine or you pay for an extra day and you are still obliged to feed the crew. I've never seen it done another way. It's all down on the call sheet.
Not even close to the same as a film crew. Any staff will be on salary and anyone else is a volunteer.
I’ve never been on a campaign.
But my assumption was that this is effectively the same as a late night IT shift, ie you kind of have to bring in the pizza (or curry) as part of the deal.
I have never seen this as a “party”, but effectively part of the work itself.
But I now await full clarity. Keir is at best incompetent for letting this story roll on.
SKS knows he is screwed and is now looking around for any old desperate excuse. He’s fucked.
Yes and Trump is President after winning the election. Your insight is as ever invaluable. Fancy a £100 bet he isn't prosecuted?
He's committed a cardinal sin. Being a plausible Labour PM. However. He isn't very good. Boris is a tactical political savant unmatched. Unfortunately, I fear he's also a strategic buffoon. I held no truck with the idea we were headed for a '97 before this weekend. No I'm not so sure. It may not happen next time, but Big Dog is leading the Tories into the wilderness for a generation. There is no suggestion that the fact that they've lost 1 in 5 councillors has even been cause for a moments reflection. Just destroy the prevailing threat as it presents. Just like Sunak. Meanwhile, your own popularity just falls. Because it can't actually just be that you might possibly be at all inadequate.
Johnson cares not a jot what happens to anyone else including tory councillors.
Or even tory ex-councillors. Of whom I know a few; must write to them.
But the golden rule of Alex de Pfeffel is what it has always been. If you have dealings with him, you will eventually regret it. It's just a matter of time.
I wonder how many of these ex-councillors were only a few months ago at conference whooping and cheering with joy at the sight of their beloved leader?
I honestly have no clue who goes to conferences - those councillors I've met don't seem keen to have done it more than once as an obligation, like it was a less fulfulling kind of Hajj.
I thought Starmer would be fine, now we have Roger saying no problem at all because its like that on films sets.....Starmer now gone by the summer odds on.
I think he’ll be gone within a week . Starmer had things Johnson lacked , integrity and principles . So even though people accused him of being dull , that could have been a winner , I might be dull but I’m honest . This seems shot to pieces even if he doesn’t receive a FPN. Unless Johnson receives several more FPNs and a trashing from Gray and the Tories stick with him then it’s going to be a huge struggle for Labour .
People before Profit has got in in Foyle at the expense of the DUP.
How did that happen, the UUP and DUP were well above a quota between them,
PBP not confirmed on SKY or BBC websites
PBP have been eliminated - their preferences are currently being counted to see if UUP or DUP get the last seat - SDLP are far enough ahead that it is impossible for both UUP and DUP to catch them.
Is this a conspiracy by Corbynites and the left to discredited Starmer for his move to the centre ?
Well someone leaked it and someone must have a motive.
Is there anything untoward? It's exactly the sort of itinery everyone who works on location would get daily. How else would they do it?
What labour should really worry about is who is leaking this and their motive
I have already suggested this could be a reaction from Corbynites and the left in response to Starmer's move to the centre
The could just have much wide implications for labour
It’s all very cloak and dagger . I suspect Starmer will be gone soon which personally I feel is a shame .
It smells like a story cooked up in Tory HQ, eagerly promoted by Tory-friendly media, and now the Labour far left are joining in.
Not a crowd I’d personally like any part of.
Some Corbyn fans would rather see Labour lose a GE than have the non pure Starmer win. It really pisses me off when some in Labour won’t accept the imperfect but bearable because unless any leader has passes the left purity test they’d rather just watch the Tories destroy the country .
Some want to pin this on conservatives and the press , but a pattern is emerging that this may be from disaffected labourites
Remember, it was an independent Durham councillor who had lost his mother who made the formal complaint to Durham Police which resulted in this detective led investigation, and tonight Diane Abbott suggest Starmer will need to resign if he receives a FPN
Furthermore 2 students who were present and took a video want to speak to the police, I doubt they would be conservative students at that event
It may not be a left conspiracy but I wouldn't rule it out
Is this a conspiracy by Corbynites and the left to discredited Starmer for his move to the centre ?
Well someone leaked it and someone must have a motive.
Is there anything untoward? It's exactly the sort of itinery everyone who works on location would get daily. How else would they do it?
What labour should really worry about is who is leaking this and their motive
I have already suggested this could be a reaction from Corbynites and the left in response to Starmer's move to the centre
The could just have much wide implications for labour
Should the Tories, or should they not, be better employed reflecting on why they lost 20% of their councillors? A fit leader would.
Absolutely and replacing Boris is a start
However this does nor deflect from the mess Starmer finds himself in and entirely of his own making
The news channels tonight are terrible for him and questioning his own truthfulness
I carry no candle for SKS. I think he's a nice enough bloke. Would be a lovely neighbour. Lend you a tenner or a hoover if yours broke. Useless politician though. When you lose 1 in 5 councillors Occam's Razor suggests the issue might be with you. Not who your opponent is.
He's committed a cardinal sin. Being a plausible Labour PM. However. He isn't very good. Boris is a tactical political savant unmatched. Unfortunately, I fear he's also a strategic buffoon. I held no truck with the idea we were headed for a '97 before this weekend. No I'm not so sure. It may not happen next time, but Big Dog is leading the Tories into the wilderness for a generation. There is no suggestion that the fact that they've lost 1 in 5 councillors has even been cause for a moments reflection. Just destroy the prevailing threat as it presents. Just like Sunak. Meanwhile, his own popularity just falls. Because it can't actually just be that he might possibly be at all inadequate.
This is the correct analysis.
Hubris (along with corruption, incompetence and deceit) has overtaken the Tories.
I see a tweet was issued by Keir Starmer at 10:13pm of the night in question, including photos from his campaign visit. So *somebody* was working.
If you remember back to The Player, when he’s walking away from the police station, the police watching him from the window suspecting he’s guilty, but they didn’t have the evidence. The clear difference between the beergate and cake party is the difference in evidence. The government paid a photographer to prove to the police they had stopped work for a bit of socialising. The police will never have that in the Starmer case. He’ll get exonerated, a boost from the exoneration, and the story will be dead of any use in future.
You only have to read the story on front the Sunday Times to see how Starmer gets off. Beneath the juicy headline which draws you in, the star witness for the LOTOcide says some people didn’t work through the event, they just socialised. That means some did. And on even the ones who didn’t, the police will ask the witness, do you have any evidence to prove your claim against those who didn’t?
The people who we know really partied in lockdown in Downing Street were civil servants and SPADS. What Boris and Sunak done at the cake eating is not worthy of a Fixed penalty notice, they ended up with one for two reasons, media reveal the actual proper parties drew a wide ranging investigation into what had gone on, and they hired a photographer to give the police perfect evidence for the FPN they got.
I fed your comment into GPT-3 and asked it to expand it. Here goes:
So I think we can assume that the party Starmer went to was attended by civil servants, not MPs or ministers. We also know that Starmer himself is on record as saying he didn't go to the party, but he's a civil servant, so it doesn't matter if he lied about it, he's still protected by civil service privilege.
But what else can we say?
Starmer wasn’t there. The people who were there were civil servants and SPADS.
And if you look at the picture, you'll see that they're all smiling.
That means they had fun. They had a laugh. They celebrated.
They didn't have to work. They didn't have to stay late.
And now they've got a photo of them doing it.
That's why they don't care about the cake.
Because no one knows about the cake.
No one knows about the cake because the press isn't interested in the cake.
I think a big mistake Starmer made was calling for resignations because of an investigation rather than at least waiting to the end of that .
The Tories will be enjoying this but ironically they don’t want Starmer to resign . We all know Johnson is utterly shameless and his right wing paper friends will do their best to spin things but if Starmer goes the first thing most of the public will ask is why is Johnson still there .
What happens if he gets more FPNs , what if the Sue Gray report is damning .
Make the point that Johnson has broken the laws he created and should resign because he lied to parliament about doing to. I always said lying to parliament was the biggie.
If we come out of this with Johnson still as PM and Starmer gone as the Met slap out a stack of FPNs and the Grey report details Johnson partying at the "I sacked Cummings" event I will likely wee myself laughing.
Sorry that's rubbish - most ordinary people dont give a chit he lied to parliament , its that he made laws for them he could not keep himself.So he should go and Starmer should go given he voted for them as well.Maybe in future it will mean politicians think twice about imposing stupid laws on people because its the "right thing to do"
I'm the only person not surprised by it but then I never took the Covid laws literally myself.
I ignored the pettifogging interpretations that I found irrational or silly, and met my parents several times outside for walks and chats.
Sure, I broke the laws. i sat on park benches with friends when that was literally (I think) illegal. Then-wife and I had a pizza in a house with another couple near the end of lockdown 1. Etc. Personally, however, I didn’t have a massive party at my home - Boris - nor did I order curry for 30 with a ton of booze and get loaded - Starmer. Nor did I, at the same time, impose stringent laws on the rest of British humanity, which I had no intention of obeying - Boris - and nor did I whine that these laws should be stricter and go on longer - Starmer - who had no intention of obeying
Fuckers. I despise them
I’d be quite happy to get rid of the entire House of Commons, as is, Tory, LD and Labour alike, and SNP, all of them, and start over
How about a Cabinet of PBers, with a Parliament of the rest?
TSE - PM Cyclefree - Home Secretary MaxPB - Chancellor BlancheLivermore - Foreign Secretary Dura Ace - Defence Casino Royale - Transport Me - Education Foxy - Health DavidL - Justice Moon rabbit - Minister for Sport Leon - Culture Eabhal - Scotland Y Bardd Cwsc - Wales Beibherli C - Northern Ireland Gallowgate - Levelling Up. Malmesbury - Leader of the House and responsible for the ONS assisted by tlg86
Just think how much better a government that would be than this one...
The only way you could make this worse would be by adding me
Yeah. Feel honoured no-one suggested me. PB is a discerning quality site after all.
Any cabinet without you and kle4 in would be frankly dreadful.
I didn't see anyone claiming head of state, though. I tried to suggest Garden Walker for that a few days ago but there were no takers. So, reluctantly, I shall wear the crown.
Kneel, peasants.
Surely suggesting anyone other than OGH (with RCS as crown prince) should rule o'er PB, is ipso facto (& prima facie) lèse-majesté!
Flattered by the offer, but I’m afraid my first act would be to fire several posters on here.
You would make excellent PB Ambassador to United Nations, if only because it's just an Uber away for you (see OGH for reimbursement - good luck!)
Saw Zelensky promoting a fundraising initiative for Ukraine - what's interesting is the site gives options on 'direction of donation' eg defence and demining, medical aid, rebuild Ukraine. I wonder if some people, fired up with anger about the invasion, whilst happy to support various charity initiatives, actually would prefer the idea they are funding munitions, the opposite of the usual response to an aid appeal.
I thought Starmer would be fine, now we have Roger saying no problem at all because its like that on films sets.....Starmer now gone by the summer odds on.
I think he’ll be gone within a week . Starmer had things Johnson lacked , integrity and principles . So even though people accused him of being dull , that could have been a winner , I might be dull but I’m honest . This seems shot to pieces even if he doesn’t receive a FPN. Unless Johnson receives several more FPNs and a trashing from Gray and the Tories stick with him then it’s going to be a huge struggle for Labour .
Starmer has played the politics terribly. Everybody else was piling on Boris (rightly so), so he could he left it to everybody else. Also unless you never left your house for past 2 years it is more than likely you probably have broken the rules at some point.
He could have easily played it as the rules were confusing and ever changing, not surprising can find a breach. However, the PM went much further, he cultivated a culture of rampant disregard for them.
Such a take isolates you against the sort of issue he has run into.
The independent councilor Big G keeps promoting breathlessly is one of those “independent” conservative types.
Big G as I reminded you last night, “Independent” doesn’t mean independent.
Link please
Unfortunately you have been on the wrong side of this debate, even trying to shut it down, and your comment you would ban some posters really says if all about you
Big G is now speculating this is not a right wing put up job, despite the story surfacing in those Trotsky organs the Mail, and (I think) Guido Fawkes.
Certainly tho it is now being fed by left wing opponents of Keir.
I think a big mistake Starmer made was calling for resignations because of an investigation rather than at least waiting to the end of that .
The Tories will be enjoying this but ironically they don’t want Starmer to resign . We all know Johnson is utterly shameless and his right wing paper friends will do their best to spin things but if Starmer goes the first thing most of the public will ask is why is Johnson still there .
What happens if he gets more FPNs , what if the Sue Gray report is damning .
Make the point that Johnson has broken the laws he created and should resign because he lied to parliament about doing to. I always said lying to parliament was the biggie.
If we come out of this with Johnson still as PM and Starmer gone as the Met slap out a stack of FPNs and the Grey report details Johnson partying at the "I sacked Cummings" event I will likely wee myself laughing.
Sorry that's rubbish - most ordinary people dont give a chit he lied to parliament , its that he made laws for them he could not keep himself.So he should go and Starmer should go given he voted for them as well.Maybe in future it will mean politicians think twice about imposing stupid laws on people because its the "right thing to do"
I'm the only person not surprised by it but then I never took the Covid laws literally myself.
I ignored the pettifogging interpretations that I found irrational or silly, and met my parents several times outside for walks and chats.
Sure, I broke the laws. i sat on park benches with friends when that was literally (I think) illegal. Then-wife and I had a pizza in a house with another couple near the end of lockdown 1. Etc. Personally, however, I didn’t have a massive party at my home - Boris - nor did I order curry for 30 with a ton of booze and get loaded - Starmer. Nor did I, at the same time, impose stringent laws on the rest of British humanity, which I had no intention of obeying - Boris - and nor did I whine that these laws should be stricter and go on longer - Starmer - who had no intention of obeying
Fuckers. I despise them
I’d be quite happy to get rid of the entire House of Commons, as is, Tory, LD and Labour alike, and SNP, all of them, and start over
How about a Cabinet of PBers, with a Parliament of the rest?
TSE - PM Cyclefree - Home Secretary MaxPB - Chancellor BlancheLivermore - Foreign Secretary Dura Ace - Defence Casino Royale - Transport Me - Education Foxy - Health DavidL - Justice Moon rabbit - Minister for Sport Leon - Culture Eabhal - Scotland Y Bardd Cwsc - Wales Beibherli C - Northern Ireland Gallowgate - Levelling Up. Malmesbury - Leader of the House and responsible for the ONS assisted by tlg86
Just think how much better a government that would be than this one...
The only way you could make this worse would be by adding me
Yeah. Feel honoured no-one suggested me. PB is a discerning quality site after all.
I think that would be a disaster of a cabinet. Everyone on their own hobbyhorse, and no coherence.
It's the job of the PM to ensure that. What's needed is a true leader. Someone inspiring and dynamic, with grand vision and cutting insight, a keen analytical intellect and inherent charisma to bring people together and get the most out of them, selfless and humble, but confident and compelling.
Admittedly we might be short on candidates.
Well, I decided to see what GPT-3 would suggest. So I took your initial paragraph and added:
The obvious candidate is Boris Johnson. He has all those qualities in abundance. But he is also too divisive for his own good. The best way to unify the country would be to appoint someone who is acceptable to everyone, but it's difficult to think of anyone more universally disliked than Mr Johnson. It was only when he was appointed Foreign Secretary that I began to see him as anything other than a buffoon. In fact, if there were an award for the most embarrassing public figure in Britain at the moment, he'd have my vote hands down. In terms of inspirational leadership, though, it doesn't get much better than David Cameron. His achievements are astonishing: he's brought us back from the brink; rescued our economy; and saved the NHS from ruin. He's been a great friend to Europe, and played a key role in negotiating the UK's membership of the EU. And yet despite this, I fear that we'll never forgive him for giving us Brexit. No matter how much progress he makes on the economy, or how many millions of pounds he saves the NHS, we will always feel let down by his decision to call the referendum in the first place. We're still furious about it now. And while I'm sure he meant well, I can't help feeling that he could have done something else instead. Maybe he should have called the election and given us another five years of stability. But no, he had to go and do what he did. Now we've got Jeremy Corbyn as Prime Minister, and it feels like everything is falling apart. *** I mean, look at the state of things! When I woke up this morning, I didn't know whether to laugh or cry. If you're reading this, then it's probably because you want to know why I've taken such drastic action. You might even wonder whether I really am a terrorist. Well, I'm not. Not exactly. I don't believe in violence and I certainly wouldn't dream of hurting innocent civilians. All I wanted to do was to make a point. I just thought that if enough people knew what was happening, they might start to care. So here's the story of what happened yesterday… *** It started off so well. My name is Nicola Smith. I work in the City. I'm thirty-five years old and single.
I thought Starmer would be fine, now we have Roger saying no problem at all because its like that on films sets.....Starmer now gone by the summer odds on.
I think he’ll be gone within a week . Starmer had things Johnson lacked , integrity and principles . So even though people accused him of being dull , that could have been a winner , I might be dull but I’m honest . This seems shot to pieces even if he doesn’t receive a FPN. Unless Johnson receives several more FPNs and a trashing from Gray and the Tories stick with him then it’s going to be a huge struggle for Labour .
Starmer has played the politics terribly. Everybody else was piling on Boris (rightly so), so he could he left it to everybody else. Also unless you never left your house for past 2 years it is more than likely you probably have broken the rules at some point.
He could have easily played it as the rules were confusing and ever changing, not surprising can find a breach. However, the PM went much further, he cultivated a culture of rampant disregard for them.
Such a take isolates you against the sort of issue he has run into.
I genuinely think he never thought he had broken any rules in Durham and so thought he had nothing to worry about . He surely wouldn’t be that stupid to go after Johnson if he thought he could get caught .
He's committed a cardinal sin. Being a plausible Labour PM. However. He isn't very good. Boris is a tactical political savant unmatched. Unfortunately, I fear he's also a strategic buffoon. I held no truck with the idea we were headed for a '97 before this weekend. No I'm not so sure. It may not happen next time, but Big Dog is leading the Tories into the wilderness for a generation. There is no suggestion that the fact that they've lost 1 in 5 councillors has even been cause for a moments reflection. Just destroy the prevailing threat as it presents. Just like Sunak. Meanwhile, his own popularity just falls. Because it can't actually just be that he might possibly be at all inadequate.
This is the correct analysis.
Hubris (along with corruption, incompetence and deceit) has overtaken the Tories.
I see a tweet was issued by Keir Starmer at 10:13pm of the night in question, including photos from his campaign visit. So *somebody* was working.
If you remember back to The Player, when he’s walking away from the police station, the police watching him from the window suspecting he’s guilty, but they didn’t have the evidence. The clear difference between the beergate and cake party is the difference in evidence. The government paid a photographer to prove to the police they had stopped work for a bit of socialising. The police will never have that in the Starmer case. He’ll get exonerated, a boost from the exoneration, and the story will be dead of any use in future.
You only have to read the story on front the Sunday Times to see how Starmer gets off. Beneath the juicy headline which draws you in, the star witness for the LOTOcide says some people didn’t work through the event, they just socialised. That means some did. And on even the ones who didn’t, the police will ask the witness, do you have any evidence to prove your claim against those who didn’t?
The people who we know really partied in lockdown in Downing Street were civil servants and SPADS. What Boris and Sunak done at the cake eating is not worthy of a Fixed penalty notice, they ended up with one for two reasons, media reveal the actual proper parties drew a wide ranging investigation into what had gone on, and they hired a photographer to give the police perfect evidence for the FPN they got.
I fed your comment into GPT-3 and asked it to expand it. Here goes:
So I think we can assume that the party Starmer went to was attended by civil servants, not MPs or ministers. We also know that Starmer himself is on record as saying he didn't go to the party, but he's a civil servant, so it doesn't matter if he lied about it, he's still protected by civil service privilege.
But what else can we say?
Starmer wasn’t there. The people who were there were civil servants and SPADS.
And if you look at the picture, you'll see that they're all smiling.
That means they had fun. They had a laugh. They celebrated.
They didn't have to work. They didn't have to stay late.
And now they've got a photo of them doing it.
That's why they don't care about the cake.
Because no one knows about the cake.
No one knows about the cake because the press isn't interested in the cake.
All they want to know is who went to the party.
Who knew about the party?
Why did they let Starmer go to the party?
What were they celebrating?
When did they celebrate?
Did they celebrate before or after the cake?
Is it not early, West Coast o’clock, to have had one too many?
This is an opinion, not a fact. In the event of a hung parliament, what happens next will depend on exact seat counts.
Just like in 2010.
I disagree (and agree with Mike). The only party that would support the Conservatives on the Friday evening following the next GE is the DUP.
If CON+DUP > needed majority (here, SF seats will matter, but this is likely to be 322 or so) then the Conservatives can stay in power. If they are short, however much short, how the heck do they really get over the line? Say they have 310 and the the DUP have somehow managed 9. This isn't enough for a majority, so who do the Conservatives turn to?
Labour - ??! A grand coalition? Never happening unless the UK is at war with Russia (and if it somehow is, I think seat totals won't really matter within a few hours of war breaking out). SNP - Don't make me laugh. Sturgeon (and lesserly Salmond) have spent twenty years dissing the Tories. Even if the Conservatives offered IndyRef2 with the question being "Should Scotland leave the Union? YES PLEASE or NO I DON'T WANT TO STAY" I think the SNP would decline. No way is the SNP even going to offer C&S. Liberal Democrats - yeah yeah. Ed Davey was in the Lib-Con coalition - big deal. If the Conservatives lose 55 seats in 2024, just like Brown in 2010, they'll be seen as the losers. Davey won't want to prop them up, and his own party's experience of 2010-2015 will still weigh on their minds. They won't help, not even C&S. After that? Who's left? Plaid - not happening for much the same reasons as the SNP. Greens - don't make me laugh. SDLP, the Alliance or Sinn Fein - Not happening as they'll just follow their respective GB party's lead. The UUP/Reform/UKIP aren't likely to win any seats and I can't see any independent winning who'd then jump in bed with the Conservatives.
The Conservatives would face the same problem in this 2024 situation as Labour faced in 2010. Too long in power, too tired, too much seen as a thing of the past.
The Conservatives need to win 314 or more in 2024. Anything less and they're out.
He's committed a cardinal sin. Being a plausible Labour PM. However. He isn't very good. Boris is a tactical political savant unmatched. Unfortunately, I fear he's also a strategic buffoon. I held no truck with the idea we were headed for a '97 before this weekend. No I'm not so sure. It may not happen next time, but Big Dog is leading the Tories into the wilderness for a generation. There is no suggestion that the fact that they've lost 1 in 5 councillors has even been cause for a moments reflection. Just destroy the prevailing threat as it presents. Just like Sunak. Meanwhile, his own popularity just falls. Because it can't actually just be that he might possibly be at all inadequate.
This is the correct analysis.
Hubris (along with corruption, incompetence and deceit) has overtaken the Tories.
I see a tweet was issued by Keir Starmer at 10:13pm of the night in question, including photos from his campaign visit. So *somebody* was working.
If you remember back to The Player, when he’s walking away from the police station, the police watching him from the window suspecting he’s guilty, but they didn’t have the evidence. The clear difference between the beergate and cake party is the difference in evidence. The government paid a photographer to prove to the police they had stopped work for a bit of socialising. The police will never have that in the Starmer case. He’ll get exonerated, a boost from the exoneration, and the story will be dead of any use in future.
You only have to read the story on front the Sunday Times to see how Starmer gets off. Beneath the juicy headline which draws you in, the star witness for the LOTOcide says some people didn’t work through the event, they just socialised. That means some did. And on even the ones who didn’t, the police will ask the witness, do you have any evidence to prove your claim against those who didn’t?
The people who we know really partied in lockdown in Downing Street were civil servants and SPADS. What Boris and Sunak done at the cake eating is not worthy of a Fixed penalty notice, they ended up with one for two reasons, media reveal the actual proper parties drew a wide ranging investigation into what had gone on, and they hired a photographer to give the police perfect evidence for the FPN they got.
I fed your comment into GPT-3 and asked it to expand it. Here goes:
So I think we can assume that the party Starmer went to was attended by civil servants, not MPs or ministers. We also know that Starmer himself is on record as saying he didn't go to the party, but he's a civil servant, so it doesn't matter if he lied about it, he's still protected by civil service privilege.
But what else can we say?
Starmer wasn’t there. The people who were there were civil servants and SPADS.
And if you look at the picture, you'll see that they're all smiling.
That means they had fun. They had a laugh. They celebrated.
They didn't have to work. They didn't have to stay late.
And now they've got a photo of them doing it.
That's why they don't care about the cake.
Because no one knows about the cake.
No one knows about the cake because the press isn't interested in the cake.
All they want to know is who went to the party.
Who knew about the party?
Why did they let Starmer go to the party?
What were they celebrating?
When did they celebrate?
Did they celebrate before or after the cake?
Is it not early, West Coast o’clock, to have had one too many?
This is an opinion, not a fact. In the event of a hung parliament, what happens next will depend on exact seat counts.
Just like in 2010.
I disagree (and agree with Mike). The only party that would support the Conservatives on the Friday evening following the next GE is the DUP.
If CON+DUP > needed majority (here, SF seats will matter, but this is likely to be 322 or so) then the Conservatives can stay in power. If they are short, however much short, how the heck do they really get over the line? Say they have 310 and the the DUP have somehow managed 9. This isn't enough for a majority, so who do the Conservatives turn to?
Labour - ??! A grand coalition? Never happening unless the UK is at war with Russia (and if it somehow is, I think seat totals won't really matter within a few hours of war breaking out). SNP - Don't make me laugh. Sturgeon (and lesserly Salmond) have spent twenty years dissing the Tories. Even if the Conservatives offered IndyRef2 with the question being "Should Scotland leave the Union? YES PLEASE or NO I DON'T WANT TO STAY" I think the SNP would decline. No way is the SNP even going to offer C&S. Liberal Democrats - yeah yeah. Ed Davey was in the Lib-Con coalition - big deal. If the Conservatives lose 55 seats in 2024, just like Brown in 2010, they'll be seen as the losers. Davey won't want to prop them up, and his own party's experience of 2010-2015 will still weigh on their minds. They won't help, not even C&S. After that? Who's left? Plaid - not happening for much the same reasons as the SNP. Greens - don't make me laugh. SDLP, the Alliance or Sinn Fein - Not happening as they'll just follow their respective GB party's lead. The UUP/Reform/UKIP aren't likely to win any seats and I can't see any independent winning who'd then jump in bed with the Conservatives.
The Conservatives would face the same problem in this 2024 situation as Labour faced in 2010. Too long in power, too tired, too much seen as a thing of the past.
The Conservatives need to win 314 or more in 2024. Anything less and they're out.
He's committed a cardinal sin. Being a plausible Labour PM. However. He isn't very good. Boris is a tactical political savant unmatched. Unfortunately, I fear he's also a strategic buffoon. I held no truck with the idea we were headed for a '97 before this weekend. No I'm not so sure. It may not happen next time, but Big Dog is leading the Tories into the wilderness for a generation. There is no suggestion that the fact that they've lost 1 in 5 councillors has even been cause for a moments reflection. Just destroy the prevailing threat as it presents. Just like Sunak. Meanwhile, his own popularity just falls. Because it can't actually just be that he might possibly be at all inadequate.
This is the correct analysis.
Hubris (along with corruption, incompetence and deceit) has overtaken the Tories.
I see a tweet was issued by Keir Starmer at 10:13pm of the night in question, including photos from his campaign visit. So *somebody* was working.
If they tweeted that from a room in the hotel where multiple people were working together, than would be relevant. If they were working on some late night social media posts on their own in their room before turning in, it would not.
This whole thing is very silly though. Neither Boris nor Keir should resign.
Saw Zelensky promoting a fundraising initiative for Ukraine - what's interesting is the site gives options on 'direction of donation' eg defence and demining, medical aid, rebuild Ukraine. I wonder if some people, fired up with anger about the invasion, whilst happy to support various charity initiatives, actually would prefer the idea they are funding munitions, the opposite of the usual response to an aid appeal.
Some Ukrainians were actively telling people not to donate to some of the big name international charities that have just been using it as a fundraising opportunity. Donating directly to the Ukrainian government seems like a more effective way of making a difference.
Is this a conspiracy by Corbynites and the left to discredited Starmer for his move to the centre ?
Well someone leaked it and someone must have a motive.
Is there anything untoward? It's exactly the sort of itinery everyone who works on location would get daily. How else would they do it?
What labour should really worry about is who is leaking this and their motive
I have already suggested this could be a reaction from Corbynites and the left in response to Starmer's move to the centre
The could just have much wide implications for labour
It’s all very cloak and dagger . I suspect Starmer will be gone soon which personally I feel is a shame .
It smells like a story cooked up in Tory HQ, eagerly promoted by Tory-friendly media, and now the Labour far left are joining in.
Not a crowd I’d personally like any part of.
Some Corbyn fans would rather see Labour lose a GE than have the non pure Starmer win. It really pisses me off when some in Labour won’t accept the imperfect but bearable because unless any leader has passes the left purity test they’d rather just watch the Tories destroy the country .
SKS fans won't accept he is shit and that the Tories will sail to another victory under him.
The only people with a purity test is Starmer and co. He has spent more time attacking Socialists for purely factional reasons than attacking the Tories.
This is an opinion, not a fact. In the event of a hung parliament, what happens next will depend on exact seat counts.
Just like in 2010.
I disagree (and agree with Mike). The only party that would support the Conservatives on the Friday evening following the next GE is the DUP.
If CON+DUP > needed majority (here, SF seats will matter, but this is likely to be 322 or so) then the Conservatives can stay in power. If they are short, however much short, how the heck do they really get over the line? Say they have 310 and the the DUP have somehow managed 9. This isn't enough for a majority, so who do the Conservatives turn to?
Labour - ??! A grand coalition? Never happening unless the UK is at war with Russia (and if it somehow is, I think seat totals won't really matter within a few hours of war breaking out). SNP - Don't make me laugh. Sturgeon (and lesserly Salmond) have spent twenty years dissing the Tories. Even if the Conservatives offered IndyRef2 with the question being "Should Scotland leave the Union? YES PLEASE or NO I DON'T WANT TO STAY" I think the SNP would decline. No way is the SNP even going to offer C&S. Liberal Democrats - yeah yeah. Ed Davey was in the Lib-Con coalition - big deal. If the Conservatives lose 55 seats in 2024, just like Brown in 2010, they'll be seen as the losers. Davey won't want to prop them up, and his own party's experience of 2010-2015 will still weigh on their minds. They won't help, not even C&S. After that? Who's left? Plaid - not happening for much the same reasons as the SNP. Greens - don't make me laugh. SDLP, the Alliance or Sinn Fein - Not happening as they'll just follow their respective GB party's lead. The UUP/Reform/UKIP aren't likely to win any seats and I can't see any independent winning who'd then jump in bed with the Conservatives.
The Conservatives would face the same problem in this 2024 situation as Labour faced in 2010. Too long in power, too tired, too much seen as a thing of the past.
The Conservatives need to win 314 or more in 2024. Anything less and they're out.
I think there are three options for a hung parliament:
(1) Con + DUP > 314 - minority Conservative government (2) Lab + LD (+G+SDLP+Alliance) > Con + DUP - A LibLab coalition (or C&S) government (with the SNP having abstained on the Queens Speech) (3) Lab + LD (+G+SDLP+Alliance) < Con + DUP - Another election
Big G is now speculating this is not a right wing put up job, despite the story surfacing in those Trotsky organs the Mail, and (I think) Guido Fawkes.
Certainly tho it is now being fed by left wing opponents of Keir.
Going back to a question I posed earlier, "What do you want to happen?"
If the answer is "a fair investigation of the facts of this incident", then the right response is to let Durham police continue their work without the distraction or prejudgement of tonight's headlines.
What does The Mail want to happen?
What does Diane Abbott want to happen?
What does the student who filmed the events from outside(?) the hotel want to happen?
What does the Independent Councillor (and on PB, I'm sure we all know that even Independent Councillors have some sort of political steer) want to happen?
What does CCHQ want to happen?
They don't all want the same thing- so what will happen? And then what happens next?
He's committed a cardinal sin. Being a plausible Labour PM. However. He isn't very good. Boris is a tactical political savant unmatched. Unfortunately, I fear he's also a strategic buffoon. I held no truck with the idea we were headed for a '97 before this weekend. Now I'm not so sure. It may not happen next time, but Big Dog is leading the Tories into the wilderness for a generation. There is no suggestion that the fact that they've lost 1 in 5 councillors has even been cause for a moment's reflection. Just destroy the prevailing threat as it presents. Just like Sunak. Meanwhile, his own popularity just falls and falls. Because it can't actually be that he might possibly be at all inadequate.
I think three a decent chance of a Tory Gvt after the next election. I also think that if so, the time after will be 97 all over again. That’s just political gravity.
I thought Starmer would be fine, now we have Roger saying no problem at all because its like that on films sets.....Starmer now gone by the summer odds on.
I think he’ll be gone within a week . Starmer had things Johnson lacked , integrity and principles . So even though people accused him of being dull , that could have been a winner , I might be dull but I’m honest . This seems shot to pieces even if he doesn’t receive a FPN. Unless Johnson receives several more FPNs and a trashing from Gray and the Tories stick with him then it’s going to be a huge struggle for Labour .
Starmer has played the politics terribly. Everybody else was piling on Boris (rightly so), so he could he left it to everybody else. Also unless you never left your house for past 2 years it is more than likely you probably have broken the rules at some point.
He could have easily played it as the rules were confusing and ever changing, not surprising can find a breach. However, the PM went much further, he cultivated a culture of rampant disregard for them.
Such a take isolates you against the sort of issue he has run into.
I genuinely think he never thought he had broken any rules in Durham and so thought he had nothing to worry about . He surely wouldn’t be that stupid to go after Johnson if he thought he could get caught .
He might well of thought that (although the Sunday Times claims dispute this), but as i say the chances are we all did at some and as a high profile individual plus everybody has a camera phone i would best to give yourself an out. And if he had, he would be fine as he can still give it the dull but honest. Now he is in a mess.
I thought Starmer would be fine, now we have Roger saying no problem at all because its like that on films sets.....Starmer now gone by the summer odds on.
I think he’ll be gone within a week . Starmer had things Johnson lacked , integrity and principles . So even though people accused him of being dull , that could have been a winner , I might be dull but I’m honest . This seems shot to pieces even if he doesn’t receive a FPN. Unless Johnson receives several more FPNs and a trashing from Gray and the Tories stick with him then it’s going to be a huge struggle for Labour .
Starmer has played the politics terribly. Everybody else was piling on Boris (rightly so), so he could he left it to everybody else. Also unless you never left your house for past 2 years it is more than likely you probably have broken the rules at some point.
He could have easily played it as the rules were confusing and ever changing, not surprising can find a breach. However, the PM went much further, he cultivated a culture of rampant disregard for them.
Such a take isolates you against the sort of issue he has run into.
I genuinely think he never thought he had broken any rules in Durham and so thought he had nothing to worry about . He surely wouldn’t be that stupid to go after Johnson if he thought he could get caught .
If we are all being honest the rules were ridiculous and full of ambiguity so much so I expect most of us could have received a FPN
For the PM, COE, leader and deputy leader of the labour party to end their careers on a FPN when you think about it is truly absurd and don't forget Sturgeon and Drakeford both admitted breaches of covid restrictions
It is to be hoped we never go down this route again
Chris Mason of BBC says it is very, very serious for Starmer.
Starmer won't go, the Tories obviously won't push for it as if he went the pressure on Boris could be untenable
But if he did, and Boris had to go, too, that would be a win/win.
Not really.
If Johnson goes, the Conservatives have a significant problem- nobody else can plausibly hold the current Conservative coalition together and be PM. Go on- who takes over? Truss? Wallace? Hunt?
The problem exists for Labour as well, but it's much less stark, because they are choosing a LotO. And Starmer hasn't torched any potential sucessors/rivals. Besides-let's be honest, Starmer was chosen to lose with dignity in 2024, not to be the next PM. Starmer's fall helps Labour by accelerating Project Rebuild. And all the evidence is that Labour have learnt the lesson of not letting a lefty populist within a sniff of the final round. So it's not even a win for followers of the Cult of St Jeremy The Martyr.
Are we sure the party has got itself totally bomb proof from a populist Corbynite re-run?
Yes. In the unlikely event of Starmer going, he will be replaced by someone better. Like when Blair took over from Smith.
Is this a conspiracy by Corbynites and the left to discredited Starmer for his move to the centre ?
Well someone leaked it and someone must have a motive.
Is there anything untoward? It's exactly the sort of itinery everyone who works on location would get daily. How else would they do it?
Because a pre-arranged curry and booze after work would have been breaking the law at that point in time. A stupid law, but one which he supported and voted in favour of.
I can't believe this could be how it ends for Starmer. The Mail ploughing a lone furrow on a post work beer and suddenly they could have a huge scalp.
I don't know how it works for campaign staff but on film shoots you are obliged to eat before nine or you pay for an extra day and you are still obliged to feed the crew. I've never seen it done another way. It's all down on the call sheet.
Not even close to the same as a film crew. Any staff will be on salary and anyone else is a volunteer.
I’ve never been on a campaign.
But my assumption was that this is effectively the same as a late night IT shift, ie you kind of have to bring in the pizza (or curry) as part of the deal.
I have never seen this as a “party”, but effectively part of the work itself.
But I now await full clarity. Keir is at best incompetent for letting this story roll on.
SKS knows he is screwed and is now looking around for any old desperate excuse. He’s fucked.
Yes and Trump is President after winning the election. Your insight is as ever invaluable
Harsh, but fair
Well, if you want to listen to Roger when it comes to betting predictions…
Is this a conspiracy by Corbynites and the left to discredited Starmer for his move to the centre ?
Well someone leaked it and someone must have a motive.
Is there anything untoward? It's exactly the sort of itinery everyone who works on location would get daily. How else would they do it?
What labour should really worry about is who is leaking this and their motive
I have already suggested this could be a reaction from Corbynites and the left in response to Starmer's move to the centre
The could just have much wide implications for labour
It’s all very cloak and dagger . I suspect Starmer will be gone soon which personally I feel is a shame .
It smells like a story cooked up in Tory HQ, eagerly promoted by Tory-friendly media, and now the Labour far left are joining in.
Not a crowd I’d personally like any part of.
Some Corbyn fans would rather see Labour lose a GE than have the non pure Starmer win. It really pisses me off when some in Labour won’t accept the imperfect but bearable because unless any leader has passes the left purity test they’d rather just watch the Tories destroy the country .
SKS fans won't accept he is shit and that the Tories will sail to another victory under him.
The only people with a purity test is Starmer and co. He has spent more time attacking Socialists for purely factional reasons than attacking the Tories.
Suck it up.
No not purely factional reasons, the reason he has been attacking socialists is to convince ex-LAB voters to vote for him, trying to get a Militant or Clause Four moment. I think he didn't succeed in that, but he didn't have to, at least not up to now, thanks to the clown car government.
He's committed a cardinal sin. Being a plausible Labour PM. However. He isn't very good. Boris is a tactical political savant unmatched. Unfortunately, I fear he's also a strategic buffoon. I held no truck with the idea we were headed for a '97 before this weekend. No I'm not so sure. It may not happen next time, but Big Dog is leading the Tories into the wilderness for a generation. There is no suggestion that the fact that they've lost 1 in 5 councillors has even been cause for a moments reflection. Just destroy the prevailing threat as it presents. Just like Sunak. Meanwhile, his own popularity just falls. Because it can't actually just be that he might possibly be at all inadequate.
This is the correct analysis.
Hubris (along with corruption, incompetence and deceit) has overtaken the Tories.
I see a tweet was issued by Keir Starmer at 10:13pm of the night in question, including photos from his campaign visit. So *somebody* was working.
If you remember back to The Player, when he’s walking away from the police station, the police watching him from the window suspecting he’s guilty, but they didn’t have the evidence. The clear difference between the beergate and cake party is the difference in evidence. The government paid a photographer to prove to the police they had stopped work for a bit of socialising. The police will never have that in the Starmer case. He’ll get exonerated, a boost from the exoneration, and the story will be dead of any use in future.
You only have to read the story on front the Sunday Times to see how Starmer gets off. Beneath the juicy headline which draws you in, the star witness for the LOTOcide says some people didn’t work through the event, they just socialised. That means some did. And on even the ones who didn’t, the police will ask the witness, do you have any evidence to prove your claim against those who didn’t?
The people who we know really partied in lockdown in Downing Street were civil servants and SPADS. What Boris and Sunak done at the cake eating is not worthy of a Fixed penalty notice, they ended up with one for two reasons, media reveal the actual proper parties drew a wide ranging investigation into what had gone on, and they hired a photographer to give the police perfect evidence for the FPN they got.
I fed your comment into GPT-3 and asked it to expand it. Here goes:
So I think we can assume that the party Starmer went to was attended by civil servants, not MPs or ministers. We also know that Starmer himself is on record as saying he didn't go to the party, but he's a civil servant, so it doesn't matter if he lied about it, he's still protected by civil service privilege.
But what else can we say?
Starmer wasn’t there. The people who were there were civil servants and SPADS.
And if you look at the picture, you'll see that they're all smiling.
That means they had fun. They had a laugh. They celebrated.
They didn't have to work. They didn't have to stay late.
And now they've got a photo of them doing it.
That's why they don't care about the cake.
Because no one knows about the cake.
No one knows about the cake because the press isn't interested in the cake.
Saw Zelensky promoting a fundraising initiative for Ukraine - what's interesting is the site gives options on 'direction of donation' eg defence and demining, medical aid, rebuild Ukraine. I wonder if some people, fired up with anger about the invasion, whilst happy to support various charity initiatives, actually would prefer the idea they are funding munitions, the opposite of the usual response to an aid appeal.
I’ve seen these and wondered about the legal implications. We all support Ukraine and want them to have a strong military, but suppose it was Israel, or Saudi Arabia. The law and its consequences need to be the same.
Chris Mason of BBC says it is very, very serious for Starmer.
Starmer won't go, the Tories obviously won't push for it as if he went the pressure on Boris could be untenable
But if he did, and Boris had to go, too, that would be a win/win.
Not really.
If Johnson goes, the Conservatives have a significant problem- nobody else can plausibly hold the current Conservative coalition together and be PM. Go on- who takes over? Truss? Wallace? Hunt?
The problem exists for Labour as well, but it's much less stark, because they are choosing a LotO. And Starmer hasn't torched any potential sucessors/rivals. Besides-let's be honest, Starmer was chosen to lose with dignity in 2024, not to be the next PM. Starmer's fall helps Labour by accelerating Project Rebuild. And all the evidence is that Labour have learnt the lesson of not letting a lefty populist within a sniff of the final round. So it's not even a win for followers of the Cult of St Jeremy The Martyr.
Are we sure the party has got itself totally bomb proof from a populist Corbynite re-run?
Yes. In the unlikely event of Starmer going, he will be replaced by someone better. Like when Blair took over from Smith.
Is this a conspiracy by Corbynites and the left to discredited Starmer for his move to the centre ?
Well someone leaked it and someone must have a motive.
Is there anything untoward? It's exactly the sort of itinery everyone who works on location would get daily. How else would they do it?
Because a pre-arranged curry and booze after work would have been breaking the law at that point in time. A stupid law, but one which he supported and voted in favour of.
I can't believe this could be how it ends for Starmer. The Mail ploughing a lone furrow on a post work beer and suddenly they could have a huge scalp.
I don't know how it works for campaign staff but on film shoots you are obliged to eat before nine or you pay for an extra day and you are still obliged to feed the crew. I've never seen it done another way. It's all down on the call sheet.
Not even close to the same as a film crew. Any staff will be on salary and anyone else is a volunteer.
I’ve never been on a campaign.
But my assumption was that this is effectively the same as a late night IT shift, ie you kind of have to bring in the pizza (or curry) as part of the deal.
I have never seen this as a “party”, but effectively part of the work itself.
But I now await full clarity. Keir is at best incompetent for letting this story roll on.
SKS knows he is screwed and is now looking around for any old desperate excuse. He’s fucked.
Yes and Trump is President after winning the election. Your insight is as ever invaluable. Fancy a £100 bet he isn't prosecuted?
Ah Roger, you shouldn’t let your emotions get the better of you. Especially when it comes to predictions, your track record is, mmm, interesting.
Anyway, I won’t take the bet primarily because of the way you worded it. If SKS gets a FPN, he won’t be prosecuted, he’ll just be issued with a notice. So why should I give you £100 on a sleight of wording? My view is SKS will get a FPN, not he will be sent to prison.
As you well know when it comes to betting Roger, you should always looking at the wording of the betting conditions
Rob, have you seen the you.com search engine where they have a code search subsection which hooks into i believe copilot (which was built on GPT3 tech) to write code for you query on the fly?
So rather than search and you get your stackoverflow results, you get dynamic functions returned.
Saw Zelensky promoting a fundraising initiative for Ukraine - what's interesting is the site gives options on 'direction of donation' eg defence and demining, medical aid, rebuild Ukraine. I wonder if some people, fired up with anger about the invasion, whilst happy to support various charity initiatives, actually would prefer the idea they are funding munitions, the opposite of the usual response to an aid appeal.
I’ve seen these and wondered about the legal implications. We all support Ukraine and want them to have a strong military, but suppose it was Israel, or Saudi Arabia. The law and its consequences need to be the same.
I've no idea what the legalities of donating to foreign governments is, but I'd dispute that the law would need to be the same. Just as our government imposes sanctions on some nations which prohibit us from doing various things with them, they could presumably make laws saying it was ok to donate to some nations for their defence etc but not acceptable to donate to others.
Ian Goodfellow, Apple’s director of machine learning, is leaving the company due to its return to work policy. In a note to staff, he said “I believe strongly that more flexibility would have been the best policy for my team.” He was likely the company’s most cited ML expert.
Saw Zelensky promoting a fundraising initiative for Ukraine - what's interesting is the site gives options on 'direction of donation' eg defence and demining, medical aid, rebuild Ukraine. I wonder if some people, fired up with anger about the invasion, whilst happy to support various charity initiatives, actually would prefer the idea they are funding munitions, the opposite of the usual response to an aid appeal.
I’ve seen these and wondered about the legal implications. We all support Ukraine and want them to have a strong military, but suppose it was Israel, or Saudi Arabia. The law and its consequences need to be the same.
I think that, because they are a government, legally it is okay. After all, you could buy Ukrainian government bonds completely legally.
Where it gets a bit more uncertain legally is providing funding to some of the volunteer battalions in Ukraine.
Saw Zelensky promoting a fundraising initiative for Ukraine - what's interesting is the site gives options on 'direction of donation' eg defence and demining, medical aid, rebuild Ukraine. I wonder if some people, fired up with anger about the invasion, whilst happy to support various charity initiatives, actually would prefer the idea they are funding munitions, the opposite of the usual response to an aid appeal.
I’ve seen these and wondered about the legal implications. We all support Ukraine and want them to have a strong military, but suppose it was Israel, or Saudi Arabia. The law and its consequences need to be the same.
I've no idea what the legalities of donating to foreign governments is, but I'd dispute that the law would need to be the same. Just as our government imposes sanctions on some nations which prohibit us from doing various things with them, they could presumably make laws saying it was ok to donate to some nations for their defence etc but not acceptable to donate to others.
Disagree with respect to funding (knowingly) for military purposes just because what I think is a 100% just cause might be someone else’s idea of satan. My view would be to prevent it all, and work on the premise that this is what charities and the UN are for.
He's committed a cardinal sin. Being a plausible Labour PM. However. He isn't very good. Boris is a tactical political savant unmatched. Unfortunately, I fear he's also a strategic buffoon. I held no truck with the idea we were headed for a '97 before this weekend. No I'm not so sure. It may not happen next time, but Big Dog is leading the Tories into the wilderness for a generation. There is no suggestion that the fact that they've lost 1 in 5 councillors has even been cause for a moments reflection. Just destroy the prevailing threat as it presents. Just like Sunak. Meanwhile, his own popularity just falls. Because it can't actually just be that he might possibly be at all inadequate.
This is the correct analysis.
Hubris (along with corruption, incompetence and deceit) has overtaken the Tories.
I see a tweet was issued by Keir Starmer at 10:13pm of the night in question, including photos from his campaign visit. So *somebody* was working.
If you remember back to The Player, when he’s walking away from the police station, the police watching him from the window suspecting he’s guilty, but they didn’t have the evidence. The clear difference between the beergate and cake party is the difference in evidence. The government paid a photographer to prove to the police they had stopped work for a bit of socialising. The police will never have that in the Starmer case. He’ll get exonerated, a boost from the exoneration, and the story will be dead of any use in future.
You only have to read the story on front the Sunday Times to see how Starmer gets off. Beneath the juicy headline which draws you in, the star witness for the LOTOcide says some people didn’t work through the event, they just socialised. That means some did. And on even the ones who didn’t, the police will ask the witness, do you have any evidence to prove your claim against those who didn’t?
The people who we know really partied in lockdown in Downing Street were civil servants and SPADS. What Boris and Sunak done at the cake eating is not worthy of a Fixed penalty notice, they ended up with one for two reasons, media reveal the actual proper parties drew a wide ranging investigation into what had gone on, and they hired a photographer to give the police perfect evidence for the FPN they got.
I fed your comment into GPT-3 and asked it to expand it. Here goes:
So I think we can assume that the party Starmer went to was attended by civil servants, not MPs or ministers. We also know that Starmer himself is on record as saying he didn't go to the party, but he's a civil servant, so it doesn't matter if he lied about it, he's still protected by civil service privilege.
But what else can we say?
Starmer wasn’t there. The people who were there were civil servants and SPADS.
And if you look at the picture, you'll see that they're all smiling.
That means they had fun. They had a laugh. They celebrated.
They didn't have to work. They didn't have to stay late.
And now they've got a photo of them doing it.
That's why they don't care about the cake.
Because no one knows about the cake.
No one knows about the cake because the press isn't interested in the cake.
All they want to know is who went to the party.
Who knew about the party?
Why did they let Starmer go to the party?
What were they celebrating?
When did they celebrate?
Did they celebrate before or after the cake?
Is it not early, West Coast o’clock, to have had one too many?
Ian Goodfellow, Apple’s director of machine learning, is leaving the company due to its return to work policy. In a note to staff, he said “I believe strongly that more flexibility would have been the best policy for my team.” He was likely the company’s most cited ML expert.
Saw Zelensky promoting a fundraising initiative for Ukraine - what's interesting is the site gives options on 'direction of donation' eg defence and demining, medical aid, rebuild Ukraine. I wonder if some people, fired up with anger about the invasion, whilst happy to support various charity initiatives, actually would prefer the idea they are funding munitions, the opposite of the usual response to an aid appeal.
I’ve seen these and wondered about the legal implications. We all support Ukraine and want them to have a strong military, but suppose it was Israel, or Saudi Arabia. The law and its consequences need to be the same.
I think that, because they are a government, legally it is okay. After all, you could buy Ukrainian government bonds completely legally.
Where it gets a bit more uncertain legally is providing funding to some of the volunteer battalions in Ukraine.
Saw Zelensky promoting a fundraising initiative for Ukraine - what's interesting is the site gives options on 'direction of donation' eg defence and demining, medical aid, rebuild Ukraine. I wonder if some people, fired up with anger about the invasion, whilst happy to support various charity initiatives, actually would prefer the idea they are funding munitions, the opposite of the usual response to an aid appeal.
I’ve seen these and wondered about the legal implications. We all support Ukraine and want them to have a strong military, but suppose it was Israel, or Saudi Arabia. The law and its consequences need to be the same.
I've no idea what the legalities of donating to foreign governments is, but I'd dispute that the law would need to be the same. Just as our government imposes sanctions on some nations which prohibit us from doing various things with them, they could presumably make laws saying it was ok to donate to some nations for their defence etc but not acceptable to donate to others.
Disagree with respect to funding (knowingly) for military purposes just because what I think is a 100% just cause might be someone else’s idea of satan. My view would be to prevent it all, and work on the premise that this is what charities and the UN are for.
Yes, but that's you thinking it should not be allowed, which is a fair enough opinion, but which is separate to 'the law and its consequences need to be the same' point, which suggests its inherent that it would be wrong to treat nations differently for this purpose, when we already treat nations differently for these purposes. That's why we don't have identical relations with all nations.
I can think of some weird situations if some nations started crowdfunding their military efforts though (though given cost of hardware I doubt it would help much).
He's committed a cardinal sin. Being a plausible Labour PM. However. He isn't very good. Boris is a tactical political savant unmatched. Unfortunately, I fear he's also a strategic buffoon. I held no truck with the idea we were headed for a '97 before this weekend. No I'm not so sure. It may not happen next time, but Big Dog is leading the Tories into the wilderness for a generation. There is no suggestion that the fact that they've lost 1 in 5 councillors has even been cause for a moments reflection. Just destroy the prevailing threat as it presents. Just like Sunak. Meanwhile, his own popularity just falls. Because it can't actually just be that he might possibly be at all inadequate.
This is the correct analysis.
Hubris (along with corruption, incompetence and deceit) has overtaken the Tories.
I see a tweet was issued by Keir Starmer at 10:13pm of the night in question, including photos from his campaign visit. So *somebody* was working.
If they tweeted that from a room in the hotel where multiple people were working together, than would be relevant. If they were working on some late night social media posts on their own in their room before turning in, it would not.
This whole thing is very silly though. Neither Boris nor Keir should resign.
Even if exonerated by this investigation, in many ways that should send out dangerous vibes to the electorate. We all know what Starmer is - no FPN sheds light on it BIG TIME
No one will believe him if he claimed he has had sex with the light on, so if he could see what I’ve got in boxes under my bed he’d be traumatised.
Some people actually worked through that “event” at least one carried on afterwards. For that reason and that reason alone Starmer’s popularity ratings really ought to plummet, if there is any sense in the electorate - what a stupendously boring fart.
We all know what he is, that’s exactly why he fails to get a FPN.
If we are all being honest the rules were ridiculous and full of ambiguity so much so I expect most of us could have received a FPN
For the PM, COE, leader and deputy leader of the labour party to end their careers on a FPN when you think about it is truly absurd and don't forget Sturgeon and Drakeford both admitted breaches of covid restrictions
It is to be hoped we never go down this route again
I fed that into the AI and it came back with this:
...but in the event that we do I would like to suggest that the best way forward might not be for politicians to admit guilt and receive a FPN but rather for them to take steps to make amends for past mistakes by working with the people who they've wronged By doing so I believe that the public will forgive them and any potential punishment can be avoided which will allow us to start afresh The politicians and civil servants involved should also be granted immunity from prosecution as it would appear that they are unable to manage themselves or control their behaviour so why punish others I'm a bit wary of my own proposal as I feel that it may put me on a collision course with the Crown Prosecution Service who seem determined to prosecute me regardless of the evidence that I provide Not to mention that I am still awaiting sentencing after being convicted of murder last year
He's committed a cardinal sin. Being a plausible Labour PM. However. He isn't very good. Boris is a tactical political savant unmatched. Unfortunately, I fear he's also a strategic buffoon. I held no truck with the idea we were headed for a '97 before this weekend. No I'm not so sure. It may not happen next time, but Big Dog is leading the Tories into the wilderness for a generation. There is no suggestion that the fact that they've lost 1 in 5 councillors has even been cause for a moments reflection. Just destroy the prevailing threat as it presents. Just like Sunak. Meanwhile, his own popularity just falls. Because it can't actually just be that he might possibly be at all inadequate.
This is the correct analysis.
Hubris (along with corruption, incompetence and deceit) has overtaken the Tories.
I see a tweet was issued by Keir Starmer at 10:13pm of the night in question, including photos from his campaign visit. So *somebody* was working.
If you remember back to The Player, when he’s walking away from the police station, the police watching him from the window suspecting he’s guilty, but they didn’t have the evidence. The clear difference between the beergate and cake party is the difference in evidence. The government paid a photographer to prove to the police they had stopped work for a bit of socialising. The police will never have that in the Starmer case. He’ll get exonerated, a boost from the exoneration, and the story will be dead of any use in future.
You only have to read the story on front the Sunday Times to see how Starmer gets off. Beneath the juicy headline which draws you in, the star witness for the LOTOcide says some people didn’t work through the event, they just socialised. That means some did. And on even the ones who didn’t, the police will ask the witness, do you have any evidence to prove your claim against those who didn’t?
The people who we know really partied in lockdown in Downing Street were civil servants and SPADS. What Boris and Sunak done at the cake eating is not worthy of a Fixed penalty notice, they ended up with one for two reasons, media reveal the actual proper parties drew a wide ranging investigation into what had gone on, and they hired a photographer to give the police perfect evidence for the FPN they got.
I fed your comment into GPT-3 and asked it to expand it. Here goes:
So I think we can assume that the party Starmer went to was attended by civil servants, not MPs or ministers. We also know that Starmer himself is on record as saying he didn't go to the party, but he's a civil servant, so it doesn't matter if he lied about it, he's still protected by civil service privilege.
But what else can we say?
Starmer wasn’t there. The people who were there were civil servants and SPADS.
And if you look at the picture, you'll see that they're all smiling.
That means they had fun. They had a laugh. They celebrated.
They didn't have to work. They didn't have to stay late.
And now they've got a photo of them doing it.
That's why they don't care about the cake.
Because no one knows about the cake.
No one knows about the cake because the press isn't interested in the cake.
I was thinking of that just now too. In fact in every show Spitting Image portrayed Starmer and cabinet as smarmy ineffectual goody two shoes - so “most boring superhero in the marvel universe” was a great joke. 😆
If we are all being honest the rules were ridiculous and full of ambiguity so much so I expect most of us could have received a FPN
For the PM, COE, leader and deputy leader of the labour party to end their careers on a FPN when you think about it is truly absurd and don't forget Sturgeon and Drakeford both admitted breaches of covid restrictions
It is to be hoped we never go down this route again
I fed that into the AI and it came back with this:
...but in the event that we do I would like to suggest that the best way forward might not be for politicians to admit guilt and receive a FPN but rather for them to take steps to make amends for past mistakes by working with the people who they've wronged By doing so I believe that the public will forgive them and any potential punishment can be avoided which will allow us to start afresh The politicians and civil servants involved should also be granted immunity from prosecution as it would appear that they are unable to manage themselves or control their behaviour so why punish others I'm a bit wary of my own proposal as I feel that it may put me on a collision course with the Crown Prosecution Service who seem determined to prosecute me regardless of the evidence that I provide Not to mention that I am still awaiting sentencing after being convicted of murder last year
That's utterly brilliant - especially the wonderful non sequitur of the last line.
He's committed a cardinal sin. Being a plausible Labour PM. However. He isn't very good. Boris is a tactical political savant unmatched. Unfortunately, I fear he's also a strategic buffoon. I held no truck with the idea we were headed for a '97 before this weekend. No I'm not so sure. It may not happen next time, but Big Dog is leading the Tories into the wilderness for a generation. There is no suggestion that the fact that they've lost 1 in 5 councillors has even been cause for a moments reflection. Just destroy the prevailing threat as it presents. Just like Sunak. Meanwhile, his own popularity just falls. Because it can't actually just be that he might possibly be at all inadequate.
This is the correct analysis.
Hubris (along with corruption, incompetence and deceit) has overtaken the Tories.
I see a tweet was issued by Keir Starmer at 10:13pm of the night in question, including photos from his campaign visit. So *somebody* was working.
If you remember back to The Player, when he’s walking away from the police station, the police watching him from the window suspecting he’s guilty, but they didn’t have the evidence. The clear difference between the beergate and cake party is the difference in evidence. The government paid a photographer to prove to the police they had stopped work for a bit of socialising. The police will never have that in the Starmer case. He’ll get exonerated, a boost from the exoneration, and the story will be dead of any use in future.
You only have to read the story on front the Sunday Times to see how Starmer gets off. Beneath the juicy headline which draws you in, the star witness for the LOTOcide says some people didn’t work through the event, they just socialised. That means some did. And on even the ones who didn’t, the police will ask the witness, do you have any evidence to prove your claim against those who didn’t?
The people who we know really partied in lockdown in Downing Street were civil servants and SPADS. What Boris and Sunak done at the cake eating is not worthy of a Fixed penalty notice, they ended up with one for two reasons, media reveal the actual proper parties drew a wide ranging investigation into what had gone on, and they hired a photographer to give the police perfect evidence for the FPN they got.
I fed your comment into GPT-3 and asked it to expand it. Here goes:
So I think we can assume that the party Starmer went to was attended by civil servants, not MPs or ministers. We also know that Starmer himself is on record as saying he didn't go to the party, but he's a civil servant, so it doesn't matter if he lied about it, he's still protected by civil service privilege.
But what else can we say?
Starmer wasn’t there. The people who were there were civil servants and SPADS.
And if you look at the picture, you'll see that they're all smiling.
That means they had fun. They had a laugh. They celebrated.
They didn't have to work. They didn't have to stay late.
And now they've got a photo of them doing it.
That's why they don't care about the cake.
Because no one knows about the cake.
No one knows about the cake because the press isn't interested in the cake.
All they want to know is who went to the party.
Who knew about the party?
Why did they let Starmer go to the party?
What were they celebrating?
When did they celebrate?
Did they celebrate before or after the cake?
Was that written sober? Just asking.....
I’ve been out drinking in the sun ALL DAY so would be a hypocrite to ask that 🙂
Rob, have you seen the you.com search engine where they have a code search subsection which hooks into i believe copilot (which was built on GPT3 tech) to write code for you query on the fly?
So rather than search and you get your stackoverflow results, you get dynamic functions returned.
I have not, but it's a logical step forward from some of the things I've seen on VS.
Rob, have you seen the you.com search engine where they have a code search subsection which hooks into i believe copilot (which was built on GPT3 tech) to write code for you query on the fly?
So rather than search and you get your stackoverflow results, you get dynamic functions returned.
I have not, but it's a logical step forward from some of the things I've seen on VS.
I am sure we will soon have similar for images thanks to dalle2 (and future developments). Not sure I fancy being in the stock image business.
He's committed a cardinal sin. Being a plausible Labour PM. However. He isn't very good. Boris is a tactical political savant unmatched. Unfortunately, I fear he's also a strategic buffoon. I held no truck with the idea we were headed for a '97 before this weekend. No I'm not so sure. It may not happen next time, but Big Dog is leading the Tories into the wilderness for a generation. There is no suggestion that the fact that they've lost 1 in 5 councillors has even been cause for a moments reflection. Just destroy the prevailing threat as it presents. Just like Sunak. Meanwhile, his own popularity just falls. Because it can't actually just be that he might possibly be at all inadequate.
This is the correct analysis.
Hubris (along with corruption, incompetence and deceit) has overtaken the Tories.
I see a tweet was issued by Keir Starmer at 10:13pm of the night in question, including photos from his campaign visit. So *somebody* was working.
If you remember back to The Player, when he’s walking away from the police station, the police watching him from the window suspecting he’s guilty, but they didn’t have the evidence. The clear difference between the beergate and cake party is the difference in evidence. The government paid a photographer to prove to the police they had stopped work for a bit of socialising. The police will never have that in the Starmer case. He’ll get exonerated, a boost from the exoneration, and the story will be dead of any use in future.
You only have to read the story on front the Sunday Times to see how Starmer gets off. Beneath the juicy headline which draws you in, the star witness for the LOTOcide says some people didn’t work through the event, they just socialised. That means some did. And on even the ones who didn’t, the police will ask the witness, do you have any evidence to prove your claim against those who didn’t?
The people who we know really partied in lockdown in Downing Street were civil servants and SPADS. What Boris and Sunak done at the cake eating is not worthy of a Fixed penalty notice, they ended up with one for two reasons, media reveal the actual proper parties drew a wide ranging investigation into what had gone on, and they hired a photographer to give the police perfect evidence for the FPN they got.
I fed your comment into GPT-3 and asked it to expand it. Here goes:
So I think we can assume that the party Starmer went to was attended by civil servants, not MPs or ministers. We also know that Starmer himself is on record as saying he didn't go to the party, but he's a civil servant, so it doesn't matter if he lied about it, he's still protected by civil service privilege.
But what else can we say?
Starmer wasn’t there. The people who were there were civil servants and SPADS.
And if you look at the picture, you'll see that they're all smiling.
That means they had fun. They had a laugh. They celebrated.
They didn't have to work. They didn't have to stay late.
And now they've got a photo of them doing it.
That's why they don't care about the cake.
Because no one knows about the cake.
No one knows about the cake because the press isn't interested in the cake.
All they want to know is who went to the party.
Who knew about the party?
Why did they let Starmer go to the party?
What were they celebrating?
When did they celebrate?
Did they celebrate before or after the cake?
Was that written sober? Just asking.....
That was written by GPT-3.
Your creative genius isn’t needed anymore Roger - you’ve been replaced by a 1.99 app on Robert’s phone.
But good news. We’ve had a wip round, and got you a three month MUBI subscription. 🙂
Being a contributor to the PB comments section I naturally..... read every comment on this thread, and I am so grateful for all of them. Thank you all! The discussion is now closed, but please feel free to continue your discussions in the comments sections of any other threads on this site.
He's committed a cardinal sin. Being a plausible Labour PM. However. He isn't very good. Boris is a tactical political savant unmatched. Unfortunately, I fear he's also a strategic buffoon. I held no truck with the idea we were headed for a '97 before this weekend. No I'm not so sure. It may not happen next time, but Big Dog is leading the Tories into the wilderness for a generation. There is no suggestion that the fact that they've lost 1 in 5 councillors has even been cause for a moments reflection. Just destroy the prevailing threat as it presents. Just like Sunak. Meanwhile, his own popularity just falls. Because it can't actually just be that he might possibly be at all inadequate.
This is the correct analysis.
Hubris (along with corruption, incompetence and deceit) has overtaken the Tories.
I see a tweet was issued by Keir Starmer at 10:13pm of the night in question, including photos from his campaign visit. So *somebody* was working.
If they tweeted that from a room in the hotel where multiple people were working together, than would be relevant. If they were working on some late night social media posts on their own in their room before turning in, it would not.
This whole thing is very silly though. Neither Boris nor Keir should resign.
Even if exonerated by this investigation, in many ways that should send out dangerous vibes to the electorate. We all know what Starmer is - no FPN sheds light on it BIG TIME
No one will believe him if he claimed he has had sex with the light on, so if he could see what I’ve got in boxes under my bed he’d be traumatised.
Some people actually worked through that “event” at least one carried on afterwards. For that reason and that reason alone Starmer’s popularity ratings really ought to plummet, if there is any sense in the electorate - what a stupendously boring fart.
We all know what he is, that’s exactly why he fails to get a FPN.
I really have no idea what you mean
Make a sentence using the following words. Fart. Boring. Very very very very very very very very very very very very very very
If Starmo resigns then Bozzatron has to too. If Starmo goes but Bozza doesn’t, you end up with fresh faced ladies Reeves or Phillipson against dishonourable damaged goods ageing bloke Bozza.
Ergo, in game theory terms the Tories must ensure Starmo doesn’t resign unless Bozza does too, which he won’t.
He's committed a cardinal sin. Being a plausible Labour PM. However. He isn't very good. Boris is a tactical political savant unmatched. Unfortunately, I fear he's also a strategic buffoon. I held no truck with the idea we were headed for a '97 before this weekend. No I'm not so sure. It may not happen next time, but Big Dog is leading the Tories into the wilderness for a generation. There is no suggestion that the fact that they've lost 1 in 5 councillors has even been cause for a moments reflection. Just destroy the prevailing threat as it presents. Just like Sunak. Meanwhile, his own popularity just falls. Because it can't actually just be that he might possibly be at all inadequate.
This is the correct analysis.
Hubris (along with corruption, incompetence and deceit) has overtaken the Tories.
I see a tweet was issued by Keir Starmer at 10:13pm of the night in question, including photos from his campaign visit. So *somebody* was working.
If they tweeted that from a room in the hotel where multiple people were working together, than would be relevant. If they were working on some late night social media posts on their own in their room before turning in, it would not.
This whole thing is very silly though. Neither Boris nor Keir should resign.
Even if exonerated by this investigation, in many ways that should send out dangerous vibes to the electorate. We all know what Starmer is - no FPN sheds light on it BIG TIME
No one will believe him if he claimed he has had sex with the light on, so if he could see what I’ve got in boxes under my bed he’d be traumatised.
Some people actually worked through that “event” at least one carried on afterwards. For that reason and that reason alone Starmer’s popularity ratings really ought to plummet, if there is any sense in the electorate - what a stupendously boring fart.
We all know what he is, that’s exactly why he fails to get a FPN.
Boris is audacious and cares about nothing except himself. Is there really *nothing* he could offer one of the smaller parties that Kier Starmer wouldn't?
- SNP: Independence referendum - LD: Referendum on PR and/or rejoining EU - DUP: Ban dancing, digital watches and most kinds of hats, or whatever it is they want
Is this a conspiracy by Corbynites and the left to discredited Starmer for his move to the centre ?
Well someone leaked it and someone must have a motive.
One thought.
If you believe that something genuinely seriously bad has happened, you take it to the police.
If you think that something that looks seriously bad (but isn't) has happened, you take it to the papers.
I don't know if what happened in Durham broke the rules that applied at that time or not. And I'm of the view that if Starmer, Rayner or others get fined, their position is untenable. If that means that they can take down Johnson on their way out, that's a valuable final service for a grateful nation.
But it's also possible that Labour's biggest sin is to fail to bow down before the gods of the Daily Mail. And whilst that's definitely a problem for a party that wants to win elections, I can't help but admire them for that. Giving in to bullies never works in the long run.
It is quite a disturbing idea that Dacre can assist in taking down worrysome politicians on Johnson's behalf. Cameron, May, Sunak, Starmer, the next Labour Leader, the next Cabinet Minister who outshines Johnson and all their successors until Johnson decides to call it a day.
Comments
A fit leader would.
But my assumption was that this is effectively the same as a late night IT shift, ie you kind of have to bring in the pizza (or curry) as part of the deal.
I have never seen this as a “party”, but effectively part of the work itself.
But I now await full clarity.
Keir is at best incompetent for letting this story roll on.
Levelling up / Communities Sec / Northern Powerhouse - @Roger
Not a crowd I’d personally like any part of.
The PBP transfers will see the SDLP home. And it's probably likely now that the UUP will take the fifth seat with SDLP overs.
However this does nor deflect from the mess Starmer finds himself in and entirely of his own making
The news channels tonight are terrible for him and questioning his own truthfulness
There is a dabbling with forces that aren't properly understood. This could easily end badly.
http://marchonfilm.com/call-sheets/
Admittedly we might be short on candidates.
You only have to read the story on front the Sunday Times to see how Starmer gets off. Beneath the juicy headline which draws you in, the star witness for the LOTOcide says some people didn’t work through the event, they just socialised. That means some did. And on even the ones who didn’t, the police will ask the witness, do you have any evidence to prove your claim against those who didn’t?
The people who we know really partied in lockdown in Downing Street were civil servants and SPADS. What Boris and Sunak done at the cake eating is not worthy of a Fixed penalty notice, they ended up with one for two reasons, media reveal the actual proper parties drew a wide ranging investigation into what had gone on, and they hired a photographer to give the police perfect evidence for the FPN they got.
Remember, it was an independent Durham councillor who had lost his mother who made the formal complaint to Durham Police which resulted in this detective led investigation, and tonight Diane Abbott suggest Starmer will need to resign if he receives a FPN
Furthermore 2 students who were present and took a video want to speak to the police, I doubt they would be conservative students at that event
It may not be a left conspiracy but I wouldn't rule it out
Useless politician though.
When you lose 1 in 5 councillors Occam's Razor suggests the issue might be with you. Not who your opponent is.
So I think we can assume that the party Starmer went to was attended by civil servants, not MPs or ministers. We also know that Starmer himself is on record as saying he didn't go to the party, but he's a civil servant, so it doesn't matter if he lied about it, he's still protected by civil service privilege.
But what else can we say?
Starmer wasn’t there. The people who were there were civil servants and SPADS.
And if you look at the picture, you'll see that they're all smiling.
That means they had fun. They had a laugh. They celebrated.
They didn't have to work. They didn't have to stay late.
And now they've got a photo of them doing it.
That's why they don't care about the cake.
Because no one knows about the cake.
No one knows about the cake because the press isn't interested in the cake.
All they want to know is who went to the party.
Who knew about the party?
Why did they let Starmer go to the party?
What were they celebrating?
When did they celebrate?
Did they celebrate before or after the cake?
Big G as I reminded you last night, “Independent” doesn’t mean independent.
https://u24.gov.ua/
He could have easily played it as the rules were confusing and ever changing, not surprising can find a breach. However, the PM went much further, he cultivated a culture of rampant disregard for them.
Such a take isolates you against the sort of issue he has run into.
Unfortunately you have been on the wrong side of this debate, even trying to shut it down, and your comment you would ban some posters really says if all about you
Certainly tho it is now being fed by left wing opponents of Keir.
The obvious candidate is Boris Johnson. He has all those qualities in abundance. But he is also too divisive for his own good. The best way to unify the country would be to appoint someone who is acceptable to everyone, but it's difficult to think of anyone more universally disliked than Mr Johnson. It was only when he was appointed Foreign Secretary that I began to see him as anything other than a buffoon. In fact, if there were an award for the most embarrassing public figure in Britain at the moment, he'd have my vote hands down.
In terms of inspirational leadership, though, it doesn't get much better than David Cameron. His achievements are astonishing: he's brought us back from the brink; rescued our economy; and saved the NHS from ruin. He's been a great friend to Europe, and played a key role in negotiating the UK's membership of the EU.
And yet despite this, I fear that we'll never forgive him for giving us Brexit. No matter how much progress he makes on the economy, or how many millions of pounds he saves the NHS, we will always feel let down by his decision to call the referendum in the first place. We're still furious about it now. And while I'm sure he meant well, I can't help feeling that he could have done something else instead. Maybe he should have called the election and given us another five years of stability.
But no, he had to go and do what he did. Now we've got Jeremy Corbyn as Prime Minister, and it feels like everything is falling apart.
***
I mean, look at the state of things! When I woke up this morning, I didn't know whether to laugh or cry. If you're reading this, then it's probably because you want to know why I've taken such drastic action. You might even wonder whether I really am a terrorist.
Well, I'm not. Not exactly. I don't believe in violence and I certainly wouldn't dream of hurting innocent civilians. All I wanted to do was to make a point. I just thought that if enough people knew what was happening, they might start to care. So here's the story of what happened yesterday…
***
It started off so well. My name is Nicola Smith. I work in the City. I'm thirty-five years old and single.
The italicised text is what GPT-3 predicted.
Do Durham Police have video or photos?
If CON+DUP > needed majority (here, SF seats will matter, but this is likely to be 322 or so) then the Conservatives can stay in power.
If they are short, however much short, how the heck do they really get over the line? Say they have 310 and the the DUP have somehow managed 9. This isn't enough for a majority, so who do the Conservatives turn to?
Labour - ??! A grand coalition? Never happening unless the UK is at war with Russia (and if it somehow is, I think seat totals won't really matter within a few hours of war breaking out).
SNP - Don't make me laugh. Sturgeon (and lesserly Salmond) have spent twenty years dissing the Tories. Even if the Conservatives offered IndyRef2 with the question being "Should Scotland leave the Union? YES PLEASE or NO I DON'T WANT TO STAY" I think the SNP would decline. No way is the SNP even going to offer C&S.
Liberal Democrats - yeah yeah. Ed Davey was in the Lib-Con coalition - big deal. If the Conservatives lose 55 seats in 2024, just like Brown in 2010, they'll be seen as the losers. Davey won't want to prop them up, and his own party's experience of 2010-2015 will still weigh on their minds. They won't help, not even C&S.
After that? Who's left?
Plaid - not happening for much the same reasons as the SNP.
Greens - don't make me laugh.
SDLP, the Alliance or Sinn Fein - Not happening as they'll just follow their respective GB party's lead.
The UUP/Reform/UKIP aren't likely to win any seats and I can't see any independent winning who'd then jump in bed with the Conservatives.
The Conservatives would face the same problem in this 2024 situation as Labour faced in 2010. Too long in power, too tired, too much seen as a thing of the past.
The Conservatives need to win 314 or more in 2024. Anything less and they're out.
Knock yourself out.
This whole thing is very silly though. Neither Boris nor Keir should resign.
The only people with a purity test is Starmer and co. He has spent more time attacking Socialists for purely factional reasons than attacking the Tories.
Suck it up.
(1) Con + DUP > 314 - minority Conservative government
(2) Lab + LD (+G+SDLP+Alliance) > Con + DUP - A LibLab coalition (or C&S) government (with the SNP having abstained on the Queens Speech)
(3) Lab + LD (+G+SDLP+Alliance) < Con + DUP - Another election
If the answer is "a fair investigation of the facts of this incident", then the right response is to let Durham police continue their work without the distraction or prejudgement of tonight's headlines.
What does The Mail want to happen?
What does Diane Abbott want to happen?
What does the student who filmed the events from outside(?) the hotel want to happen?
What does the Independent Councillor (and on PB, I'm sure we all know that even Independent Councillors have some sort of political steer) want to happen?
What does CCHQ want to happen?
They don't all want the same thing- so what will happen? And then what happens next?
For the PM, COE, leader and deputy leader of the labour party to end their careers on a FPN when you think about it is truly absurd and don't forget Sturgeon and Drakeford both admitted breaches of covid restrictions
It is to be hoped we never go down this route again
https://twitter.com/Mylovanov/status/1522976325706821632
Anyway, I won’t take the bet primarily because of the way you worded it. If SKS gets a FPN, he won’t be prosecuted, he’ll just be issued with a notice. So why should I give you £100 on a sleight of wording? My view is SKS will get a FPN, not he will be sent to prison.
As you well know when it comes to betting Roger, you should always looking at the wording of the betting conditions
So rather than search and you get your stackoverflow results, you get dynamic functions returned.
Ian Goodfellow, Apple’s director of machine learning, is leaving the company due to its return to work policy. In a note to staff, he said “I believe strongly that more flexibility would have been the best policy for my team.” He was likely the company’s most cited ML expert.
Where it gets a bit more uncertain legally is providing funding to some of the volunteer battalions in Ukraine.
https://youtu.be/_stiz4aWiaQ
I can think of some weird situations if some nations started crowdfunding their military efforts though (though given cost of hardware I doubt it would help much).
No one will believe him if he claimed he has had sex with the light on, so if he could see what I’ve got in boxes under my bed he’d be traumatised.
Some people actually worked through that “event” at least one carried on afterwards. For that reason and that reason alone Starmer’s popularity ratings really ought to plummet, if there is any sense in the electorate - what a stupendously boring fart.
We all know what he is, that’s exactly why he fails to get a FPN.
...but in the event that we do I would like to suggest that the best way forward might not be for politicians to admit guilt and receive a FPN but rather for them to take steps to make amends for past mistakes by working with the people who they've wronged
By doing so I believe that the public will forgive them and any potential punishment can be avoided which will allow us to start afresh
The politicians and civil servants involved should also be granted immunity from prosecution as it would appear that they are unable to manage themselves or control their behaviour so why punish others
I'm a bit wary of my own proposal as I feel that it may put me on a collision course with the Crown Prosecution Service who seem determined to prosecute me regardless of the evidence that I provide
Not to mention that I am still awaiting sentencing after being convicted of murder last year
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-61363969
But good news. We’ve had a wip round, and got you a three month MUBI subscription. 🙂
The system in Northern Ireland means that there are no by-elections for councils, instead if someone resigns their party can co-opt a replacement.
Anyone elected as an MLA must resign from council, so there are plenty of changes coming.
The discussion is now closed, but please feel free to continue your discussions in the comments sections of any other threads on this site.
How pleasant.
Ergo, in game theory terms the Tories must ensure Starmo doesn’t resign unless Bozza does too, which he won’t.
Tricky one. @HYUFD is right.
Boris is audacious and cares about nothing except himself. Is there really *nothing* he could offer one of the smaller parties that Kier Starmer wouldn't?
- SNP: Independence referendum
- LD: Referendum on PR and/or rejoining EU
- DUP: Ban dancing, digital watches and most kinds of hats, or whatever it is they want