Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

PB Predictions Competition 2024 – July update – politicalbetting.com

135

Comments

  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,474
    edited July 2024

    He was picked because he was young, gay, blonde and from Coronation Street.

    That was basically it.
    He isn't gay, he is married. For Tatton he would probably have been a good fit
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 35,155
    HYUFD said:

    Yougov has 25% of 2019 Conservative voters voting Reform in 2024 to only 10% of 2019 Conservative voters switching to Labour and just 7% to the LDs and 2% to the Greens

    https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/49978-how-britain-voted-in-the-2024-general-election

    That's a very interesting poll. I was surprised that only 3% of 2019 Labour voters switched to Reform. I thought Reform were supposed to be taking significant numbers of voters from both main parties.
  • TazTaz Posts: 17,116

    I’ve chosen a good week to make an existential YouTube crisis video. Having just passed one MILLION views.

    And a view on YT is someone deliberately clicking and then watching at least 30 seconds

    Does it not count as a view if the video plays following on from another one then ?
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,933
    HYUFD said:

    He isn't gay, he is married
    Are you really that much behind the times?
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,474

    That's a very interesting poll. I was surprised that only 3% of 2019 Labour voters switched to Reform. I thought Reform were supposed to be taking significant numbers of voters from both main parties.
    More 2019 Labour voters went Green, 10%
  • boulayboulay Posts: 6,039
    IanB2 said:

    Are you really that much behind the times?
    I think HYUFD is just countering that someone said AR was gay when he’s actually married to a woman (yes it doesn’t always mean someone isn’t, Barrymore for example) and so being factually correct on a public forum is probably the way to go than throwing out a claim that isn’t true.
  • stodgestodge Posts: 14,379
    Evening all :)

    I'm sure it's been mentioned elsewhere but I was at Lingfield this afternoon (Simon Holt on the commentary) as news filtered out about poor John Hunt.

    https://www.racingpost.com/news/britain/three-women-murdered-in-crossbow-attack-are-family-of-bbc-commentator-john-hunt-aydF93J6Aa0Q/

    Needless to say, everyone was horrified and stunned and it cast a shadow over the afternoon.

    My thoughts very much with John who was calling at Lingfield yesterday and whose voice is so familiar to regular racegoers.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 50,732
    HYUFD said:

    In which case if Kemi is a black Hague with dreadlocks she could at least get 50 extra seats even on a 2001 result for the Tories
    Hair braids, not dreads.
  • Tim_in_RuislipTim_in_Ruislip Posts: 439
    edited July 2024
    IanB2 said:

    Are you really that much behind the times?
    They're in opposition now, they can say wot they really think.
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 35,155
    HYUFD said:

    More 2019 Labour voters went Green, 10%
    Yes and that makes sense - the Green party has become the Green Socialist Party now so they have siphoned off Labour voters who think Starmer is too centrist. Many of those will have felt able to do so because the Tories were clearly toast.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,474
    IanB2 said:

    Even on that poll, its 25% plays 22%, which is hardly decisive. And your friend Lord A has the balance tilted marginally the other way. The best we can say is that the number of former Tories splitting right and splitting left appear to have been pretty similar.
    Just checked Ashcroft and he doesn't either.

    Ashcroft has 23% of 2019 Conservatives voting Reform in 2024 to just 21% voting Labour, LD or Green
    https://conservativehome.com/2024/07/10/lord-ashcroft-my-election-day-poll-how-britain-voted-last-thursday-and-why/#:~:text=Just under one in five (19 per cent) voted Labour,voted Remain backed the Tories.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 58,985
    IanB2 said:

    Even on that poll, its 25% plays 22%, which is hardly decisive. And your friend Lord A has the balance tilted marginally the other way. The best we can say is that the number of former Tories splitting right and splitting left appear to have been pretty similar.
    That was the extraordinary achievement of the 2019 Conservative government: they managed to lose both their Left and Right wings.

    It will, I suspect, be easier to win back the Right, and to stage some sort of recovery. But that will probably not be sufficient in itself to return the party to government. And, of course, it also has the issue of ensuring tactical voting continues.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 23,921
    kjh said:

    Why? If it is what he believes in he would be a hypocrite to do otherwise. The SDLP leader did likewise. I'm sure there were others who did the same.
    Nobody is holding a gun to their head. Either take the oath or don't. Either mean it or don't. No "I do this under protest" fuckwittery.

    Taking the oath to the Crown isn't a piece of flummery, it's a vital part of the system of Government. If he doesn't want to do it he should walk out the door and give his job to somebody else. It means something, the House of Commons isn't just a nice place to sit when it rains.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,933
    edited July 2024
    HYUFD said:

    Just checked Ashcroft and he doesn't either.

    Ashcroft has 23% of 2019 Conservatives voting Reform in 2024 to just 21% voting Labour, LD or Green
    https://conservativehome.com/2024/07/10/lord-ashcroft-my-election-day-poll-how-britain-voted-last-thursday-and-why/#:~:text=Just under one in five (19 per cent) voted Labour,voted Remain backed the Tories.
    Plus the other 2%, who will mostly be Scottish and Welsh nationalists (please don’t tell me a Tory would never have the nationalists as next preference!), and after that various left-leaning indies.

    As I said, stand back and broadly the same number of former Tories defected left and right.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 50,732
    edited July 2024
    Barnesian said:

    Far closer?

    Well they are both women, there's that.
    But Kamala and Barack are both brown.
    All three are experienced and bright.
    Kamala isn't as articulate as Barak but she is more likeable than Hillary.

    Hillary would have won the rust states is she wasn't so complacent. Kamala won't be complacent.

    I don't see why swing states would hate her. Any evidence?
    I don't particularly get the Kamala hate, apart from the obvious, but she is next in line.

    It's time to pass the baton Joe.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,474
    IanB2 said:

    Are you really that much behind the times?
    Married to a woman not a man
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,474
    edited July 2024
    IanB2 said:

    Plus the other 2%, who will mostly be Scottish and Welsh nationalists (please don’t tell me a Tory would never have the nationalists as next preference!), and after that various left-leaning indies.

    As I said, stand back and broadly the same number of former Tories defected left and right.
    The Tories first task is to get back their rightwing from defectors to Reform. If they do they get to 30-35%, then they can pick up any defectors to Labour and the LDs and other minor parties if Labour increases taxes and economic growth declines and immigration continues to rise.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,933
    rcs1000 said:

    That was the extraordinary achievement of the 2019 Conservative government: they managed to lose both their Left and Right wings.

    It will, I suspect, be easier to win back the Right, and to stage some sort of recovery. But that will probably not be sufficient in itself to return the party to government. And, of course, it also has the issue of ensuring tactical voting continues.
    And in most seats, with stable boundaries and after the big swings last week, the tactical position is much clearer now.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,933
    HYUFD said:

    The Tories first task is to get back their rightwing from defectors to Reform. If they do they get to 30-35%, then they can pick up any defectors to Labour and the LDs and other minor parties if Labour increases taxes and economic growth declines and immigration continues to rise.
    You make it sound so easy.
  • carnforthcarnforth Posts: 5,516
    So, did the new boundaries hinder or help the conservatives? Amidst the deluge, there hasn't been much discussion...
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 62,082

    Difference surely being that Sunak could have declined to read at the King's coronation and still keep his job; Lewis had no such option.
    You'd always have to swear allegiance to the State. And you could object on the ground there shouldn't be states, or not that state.

    He's being a twat.
  • Nunu5Nunu5 Posts: 981
    All the debate about whether the Tories should go right to get reform votes or centre-leftish to get lablibgreen votes are moot.

    Tories lost because on every policy they failed. From immigration to NHS to public debt and tax and spend. So they lost votes in all directions. Unless the public are convinced they are competent once again then they will not be in a position to gain enough votes back from anyone. They public have to trust they will do better on immigration and other policies not just promise "lower immigration and better services".

    They should listen to Ben Houchen
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,933
    carnforth said:

    So, did the new boundaries hinder or help the conservatives? Amidst the deluge, there hasn't been much discussion...

    They created more safe southern Tory seats for the LibDems to win.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 58,985
    viewcode said:

    Nobody is holding a gun to their head. Either take the oath or don't. Either mean it or don't. No "I do this under protest" fuckwittery.

    Taking the oath to the Crown isn't a piece of flummery, it's a vital part of the system of Government. If he doesn't want to do it he should walk out the door and give his job to somebody else. It means something, the House of Commons isn't just a nice place to sit when it rains.
    Exactly: we have the House of Lords for that
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,474
    edited July 2024
    IanB2 said:

    You make it sound so easy.
    Moving to the centre ground is not what ultimately gets opposition parties into government, it is the state of the economy largely plus issues of sleaze in government. It helps a fraction with swing voters but that is it.

    It was Black Wednesday which lost the Tories the 1997 GE, Labour were well ahead in the polls even when Blair took over.

    It was the 2008 crash and the IHT cut promise that won the Tories most seats in 2010, Brown Labour actually were ahead of 'centrist' Cameron's Tories for most of summer 2007 in the polls.

    Equally it was partygate and the Truss budget and surging interest rates and mortgage costs that gave Starmer his big poll lead over the Tories and landslide win, despite Starmer being the 'centrist' Labour candidate in 2020 Boris still led Starmer Labour comfortably in 2021 polls
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,060
    HYUFD said:

    The Tories first task is to get back their rightwing from defectors to Reform. If they do they get to 30-35%, then they can pick up any defectors to Labour and the LDs and other minor parties if Labour increases taxes and economic growth declines and immigration continues to rise.
    I don't think you're wrong. The Conservatives need to get Reform voters before they do anything else. Far too early to move to the centre just yet, perhaps for the 2030s election or some such. If they go to the centre now they'll make next to no progress.
  • BatteryCorrectHorseBatteryCorrectHorse Posts: 4,670
    edited July 2024
    I am against the monarchy in principle but not in actuality so I would take the oath on that basis.
  • stodgestodge Posts: 14,379
    HYUFD said:

    Yougov has 25% of 2019 Conservative voters voting Reform in 2024 to only 10% of 2019 Conservative voters switching to Labour and just 7% to the LDs and 2% to the Greens

    https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/49978-how-britain-voted-in-the-2024-general-election

    Why don't we look at how the "classes" matched up between 2024 and 2019:

    AB: Labour 36% (+6), Conservatives 25% (-20), Liberal Democrats 14% (-2)
    C1: Labour 36% (+4), Conservatives 23% (-22). Liberal Democrats 13% (+1)
    C2: Labour 32% (nc), Conservatives 24% (-23), Liberal Democrats 11% (+2)
    DE: Labour 34% (-7), Conservatives 23% (-18), Liberal Democrats 10% (+1)


    That pretty much tells you all you need to know especially around where the Labour gains were and possibly why the Conservatives managed to hold 30-40 seats which looked as though they could fall to either Labour or the LDs.

    As an aside, Redfield & Wilton picked up higher levels of uncertainty among women voting than men and it looks as though the DK women broke disproportionately back to the Conservatives.

    There's increasing evidence the "supermajority" meme had some impact in the final days but I'm very much of the view a lot of Labour supporters just didn't bother to vote as the result seemed a foregone conclusion. I hope someone is tracking turnout numbers by constituency - my suspicion is the biggest falls in turnout will be in those areas which were nominally "safe" for Labour.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,474
    Foxy said:

    I don't particularly get the Kamala hate, apart from the obvious, but she is next in line.

    It's time to pass the baton Joe.
    Which he won't without clear poll evidence Kamala holds the swing states he won in 2020 and Hillary lost to Trump in 2016
  • Alphabet_SoupAlphabet_Soup Posts: 3,557
    rcs1000 said:

    Exactly: we have the House of Lords for that
    The oath is to the King, his heirs and successors which could easily be construed to include an elected president according to taste.
  • FairlieredFairliered Posts: 5,472
    Bad news for all you football supporters. The game has been postponed due to the weather.





    The friendly between Peterhead and Aberdeen has been called off due to heavy rain.
  • No_Offence_AlanNo_Offence_Alan Posts: 4,906
    Carnyx said:

    It's not been compulsory to swear an oath of loyalty for a very long time, certainly on grounds of conscience.

    https://victoriancommons.wordpress.com/2023/10/23/quakers-in-the-commons-joseph-pease-and-the-right-to-affirm/
    I understand that Quakers object to oaths in general because it implies they might not be telling the truth the rest of the time.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 30,410
    Nunu5 said:

    All the debate about whether the Tories should go right to get reform votes or centre-leftish to get lablibgreen votes are moot.

    Tories lost because on every policy they failed. From immigration to NHS to public debt and tax and spend. So they lost votes in all directions. Unless the public are convinced they are competent once again then they will not be in a position to gain enough votes back from anyone. They public have to trust they will do better on immigration and other policies not just promise "lower immigration and better services".

    They should listen to Ben Houchen

    It isn't really moot, because the lack of parliamentary unity meant they didn't have an effective majority. That made really significant reform very difficult. We have really big vested interests in this country against low taxes, against reform of public services, against creating the conditions for economic growth and social mobility, against reducing immigration, against any divergence from the EU. Without a united party, the Tories never stood a chance of implementing successful reforms.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,474
    edited July 2024
    stodge said:

    Why don't we look at how the "classes" matched up between 2024 and 2019:

    AB: Labour 36% (+6), Conservatives 25% (-20), Liberal Democrats 14% (-2)
    C1: Labour 36% (+4), Conservatives 23% (-22). Liberal Democrats 13% (+1)
    C2: Labour 32% (nc), Conservatives 24% (-23), Liberal Democrats 11% (+2)
    DE: Labour 34% (-7), Conservatives 23% (-18), Liberal Democrats 10% (+1)


    That pretty much tells you all you need to know especially around where the Labour gains were and possibly why the Conservatives managed to hold 30-40 seats which looked as though they could fall to either Labour or the LDs.

    As an aside, Redfield & Wilton picked up higher levels of uncertainty among women voting than men and it looks as though the DK women broke disproportionately back to the Conservatives.

    There's increasing evidence the "supermajority" meme had some impact in the final days but I'm very much of the view a lot of Labour supporters just didn't bother to vote as the result seemed a foregone conclusion. I hope someone is tracking turnout numbers by constituency - my suspicion is the biggest falls in turnout will be in those areas which were nominally "safe" for Labour.
    Yes Reform are now the most working class party, not Labour. The LDs the most middle class party, not the Tories.

    Age and home ownership status is the biggest difference between Tories and Labour now not social class and income
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 62,082
    stodge said:

    Why don't we look at how the "classes" matched up between 2024 and 2019:

    AB: Labour 36% (+6), Conservatives 25% (-20), Liberal Democrats 14% (-2)
    C1: Labour 36% (+4), Conservatives 23% (-22). Liberal Democrats 13% (+1)
    C2: Labour 32% (nc), Conservatives 24% (-23), Liberal Democrats 11% (+2)
    DE: Labour 34% (-7), Conservatives 23% (-18), Liberal Democrats 10% (+1)


    That pretty much tells you all you need to know especially around where the Labour gains were and possibly why the Conservatives managed to hold 30-40 seats which looked as though they could fall to either Labour or the LDs.

    As an aside, Redfield & Wilton picked up higher levels of uncertainty among women voting than men and it looks as though the DK women broke disproportionately back to the Conservatives.

    There's increasing evidence the "supermajority" meme had some impact in the final days but I'm very much of the view a lot of Labour supporters just didn't bother to vote as the result seemed a foregone conclusion. I hope someone is tracking turnout numbers by constituency - my suspicion is the biggest falls in turnout will be in those areas which were nominally "safe" for Labour.
    It worked.

    I think a week before the election the Conservatives were more or less on course for a wipeout.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 62,082
    Pulpstar said:

    I don't think you're wrong. The Conservatives need to get Reform voters before they do anything else. Far too early to move to the centre just yet, perhaps for the 2030s election or some such. If they go to the centre now they'll make next to no progress.
    It's not about simple Right v. Centre, this is a very old debate, but about both - the broadest church possible - and showing you'll deliver.

    Conservatives lost votes in both directions, and therefore they must address both to return.

  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,474
    edited July 2024

    I am against the monarchy in principle but not in actuality so I would take the oath on that basis.

    Indeed and while we are less religious now in the UK and MPs can issue an oath of affirmation which does not mention God we are still majority monarchist by a clear margin in the UK and the King remains head of state.

    Essentially more Brits believe in the King than believe in Christ or Muhammad
  • Tim_in_RuislipTim_in_Ruislip Posts: 439
    edited July 2024
    edit
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 30,846
    ...
    HYUFD said:

    The LDs the most middle class party, not the Tories.

    Not according to those stats.
  • FrankBoothFrankBooth Posts: 10,022
    GIN1138 said:

    To be fair I'm sure the SDLP leader isn't generally as irritating and annoying as Clive Lewis...
    So far as I know Lewis doesn't dispute that Norwich is sovereign UK territory.

    Actually looking at it, it isn't so bad. He's being honest about it and not avoiding it.
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,753
    stodge said:

    Evening all :)

    I'm sure it's been mentioned elsewhere but I was at Lingfield this afternoon (Simon Holt on the commentary) as news filtered out about poor John Hunt.

    https://www.racingpost.com/news/britain/three-women-murdered-in-crossbow-attack-are-family-of-bbc-commentator-john-hunt-aydF93J6Aa0Q/

    Needless to say, everyone was horrified and stunned and it cast a shadow over the afternoon.

    My thoughts very much with John who was calling at Lingfield yesterday and whose voice is so familiar to regular racegoers.

    It's absolutely awful isn't it? It's hard to imagine what sort of rage could lead to someone murdering three people and no doubt if John has been home he's have been a fourth victim.

    RIP to all of them.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 34,105
    edited July 2024
    Evening all. Is curse of ITV still a thing?
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,753
    edited July 2024

    So far as I know Lewis doesn't dispute that Norwich is sovereign UK territory.

    Are you sure?

    If Clive Lewis can find something to get attention over he will, including championing independence of the Peoples Republic of Norwich....
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 30,846
    edited July 2024
    I wondered what funct
    boulay said:

    Yes, I watched election night on ITV and the Tories lost. Bloody ITV.
    Indeed. I watched Laura on the BBC and it appeared Labour and the Lib Dems had lost.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 34,105
    England 2-1.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 62,082
    Andy_JS said:

    England 2-1.

    Jesus. That was quick.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 44,516
    Andy_JS said:

    Evening all. Is curse of ITV still a thing?

    No. That's been buried.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,975
    GSTK needs a better intro as the fans always mess up the timing
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 54,203

    Bad news for all you football supporters. The game has been postponed due to the weather.





    The friendly between Peterhead and Aberdeen has been called off due to heavy rain.

    Bloody snowflakes...
  • FrankBoothFrankBooth Posts: 10,022
    How do the English feel about the Dutch? Sense there is no real animosity there?
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,474
    edited July 2024

    ...

    Not according to those stats.
    Percentage wise of their vote they are
  • LeonLeon Posts: 59,274

    It is beyond stupid.

    The Dems are condemning the rest of the world to Trump 2.0 chaos and danger because they don't want to upset an old man and his stupidly ambitious wife.

    The NY Times opinion writers and board all have it right.

    I'm fucking :rage:
    Most of PB told me I was "ranting on" when I started mentioning Biden's obvious senility about a year ago
  • FrankBoothFrankBooth Posts: 10,022
    Joe Gomez had a very good season for Liverpool. Bit surprised he wouldn't be fancied in a back 3.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,933
    Leon said:

    Most of PB told me I was "ranting on" when I started mentioning Biden's obvious senility about a year ago
    You’re always ranting on, the subject matter is immaterial.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 53,377
    Evening all! It'll probably be penalties again :lol:
  • boulayboulay Posts: 6,039
    At least we look lively. Better.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 30,846
    edited July 2024
    ...
    HYUFD said:

    Percentage wise of their vote they are
    That's not how it works.

    Good start by Engerland

    Edit. 0-1. I'll just stfu
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 22,100
    Leon said:

    Most of PB told me I was "ranting on" when I started mentioning Biden's obvious senility about a year ago
    They are obviously trying to organise an exit. There’s a wafer thin line between him leaving (or appearing to leave) on his own volition and him staying. But pressuring him publicly to leave against his will is a sure fire way to get him to dig in.

    I think he will leave, but the path is not straightforward.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,933
    Oops
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 53,377
    OK, maybe not penalties then :(
  • FlatlanderFlatlander Posts: 4,871
    Oh no
  • Tim_in_RuislipTim_in_Ruislip Posts: 439
    edited July 2024
    Right Southgate.

    This is when you earn your reputation.
  • boulayboulay Posts: 6,039
    Oops
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 54,203
    Fucking Starmer....
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 121,389
    North London screws England at a second major tournament in a row.

    First it was Harry Kane, now it is Declan Rice.
  • stodgestodge Posts: 14,379

    It worked.

    I think a week before the election the Conservatives were more or less on course for a wipeout.
    More research is needed. I suspect there will be evidence Labour voters disproportionately stayed at home (no doubt some Conservatives did as well but until we see turnout evidence I remain to be convinced).

    Let me offer three examples from suburban London:

    Bromley & Biggin Hill: - Conservative vote down 20 points, Labour up 8 - swing "only" 14% and the Conservative survived by 302 votes.

    Croydon South: - Conservative down 14.5, Labour up seven - the swing "only" 10.75%. Chris Philp survives with a majority of 2,313.

    Orpington: - Conservative down 24, Labour up seven - the swing 15.5%. Gareth saved his Bacon by 5,118.

    Had we seen the kind of swings we saw further north such as the 24.5% Conservative to Labour swing we saw in Amber Valley, both Bromley & Biggin Hill and Croydon South would have fallen.

    There's evidence (YouGov backes this) the Conservatives managed to prevent a similar collapse in the AB vote to that seen in C1 and C2 classes. The three seats I mention would be overwhelmingly AB (Orpington has more C1 in the Crays).
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 50,732
    Cracking goal to be fair.
  • jonny83jonny83 Posts: 1,273
    Thunderbolt of a strike!
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 37,391
    Andy_JS said:

    Evening all. Is curse of ITV still a thing?

    Looks like it
  • FrankBoothFrankBooth Posts: 10,022
    What were the odds before the game?
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,904
    Disappointing that Shaw isn't playing. He is really important in generating attacks down the left.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 50,732
    At least England will have to attack. Can't sit back now.
  • TazTaz Posts: 17,116
    He’s got a foot like a traction engine.
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 18,156
    HYUFD said:

    Yes Reform are now the most working class party, not Labour. The LDs the most middle class party, not the Tories.

    Age and home ownership status is the biggest difference between Tories and Labour now not social class and income
    Here's the chart you want.

    All the constituencies, deprived on left, undeprived on right. Colours as you'd expect.



    https://twitter.com/undertheraedar/status/1810214903971459216

    Suspect Reform are the party of people and places that don't see themselves as doing well, but are doing better than they realise.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 121,389
    jonny83 said:

    Thunderbolt of a strike!

    The technical term for that strike is 'thunderbastard'.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 50,732

    What were the odds before the game?

    England 2.6, Netherlands 3.1 with bet365 I think.
  • FossFoss Posts: 1,332
    If Harris goes too hard on Biden then she’ll be viewed as a traitor by at least some of the people Biden has and she’ll need.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 121,389
    No way is this a penalty.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,866
    Penalty!
  • LeonLeon Posts: 59,274
    IanB2 said:

    You’re always ranting on, the subject matter is immaterial.
    I'm nearly always RIGHT

    More notably, I'm usually right against the PB consensus, because you are all a bit intellectually mediocre, and you all herd like some pathetic sheepfold of bleating centrist dads. Soz
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,866

    No way is this a penalty.

    That aged well.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,933
    edited July 2024
    Luck beyond our due, there
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 54,203
    Lucky Starmer!!!
  • FlatlanderFlatlander Posts: 4,871
    Wow. Harsh. But who cares...
  • EabhalEabhal Posts: 9,939
    No way that is a pen!
  • jonny83jonny83 Posts: 1,273

    No way is this a penalty.

    Should definitely not be a Pen
  • One of the worst decisions I've ever seen.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 50,732
    dixiedean said:

    That aged well.
    It's still true, but that's the breaks.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 34,105
    I'd be fuming if I was a Dutch fan with this penalty decision.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 121,389
    dixiedean said:

    That aged well.
    I forgot this referee was banned for his involvement in a match fixing scandal.
  • Tim_in_RuislipTim_in_Ruislip Posts: 439
    edited July 2024
    Very surprised at that penalty decision.

    Anyway, 1-1.
  • EabhalEabhal Posts: 9,939
    The guy passing notes to Starmer at NATO is going to be busy
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,975
    Starmer’s genie now being deployed for the football
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 75,819
    dixiedean said:

    That aged well.
    TSE is quite correct (in my uninformed view).

    But I'll take it.
  • boulayboulay Posts: 6,039
    I guess dangerous play? Harsh but happy.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,866

    Here's the chart you want.

    All the constituencies, deprived on left, undeprived on right. Colours as you'd expect.



    https://twitter.com/undertheraedar/status/1810214903971459216

    Suspect Reform are the party of people and places that don't see themselves as doing well, but are doing better than they realise.
    The seats they won tend to be doing worse than some well-off neighbours.
    They are doing relatively badly, not absolutely.
  • EabhalEabhal Posts: 9,939

    I forgot this referee was banned for his involvement in a match fixing scandal.
    What's Sunak up to nowadays?
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 53,377
    Iffy penalty decision, but hey-ho!

    1-1
This discussion has been closed.