"I would reject the idea that what has happened in the economy are as a result of the actions that Liz took," says the uber-loyal Truss supporter Simon Clarke.
No surprise that PB's pub bore posts moronic shit like this:
"About two centuries before the British took India, the racist supremacist Muslim Mughals took India, and built pyramids out of skulls. The Mughals were far far worse than the British. By some estimates they killed 40-80 million Indians. Others go higher"
This is how the site you link to describes itself (these are the site's own words) -
Truncile.com, owned by Trunicle India Pvt. Ltd., derived from True Chronicles, is a pro nationalist opinion and news portal, launched in July 2020. Trunicle focuses on topics that are related to India policy, governance and current affairs. It also focuses on publishing positive & development oriented articles for youth who today struggle to find relevant material online. Trunicle does this by empowering individuals to come and raise their voice for what is RIGHT. (emphasis mine)
Umm. And have you read about what he wrote in later life, which is discredited.
@hyufd. Just to add to my post - You wouldn't quote David Irving, would you, about the Holocaust so it is worth checking what and who you are quoting. Just because it is on the internet, it doesn't make it correct. Something I have mentioned to you a few times. Leon should bear that in mind also.
‘Guidance for Scotland’s biggest health board also says that any woman who complains about a transwoman sharing their ward should be advised that “the ward is indeed female-only and that there are no men present”.’
Unbelievable, Sturgeon and her cohorts have a lot to answer for.
It’s already led to cases like this in the NHS (location not disclosed):
A patient who was raped by a transgender woman on a hospital ward could not have been raped because her attacker is defined as a woman, heard the House of Lords.
Police were told by hospital staff that the reported incident was not true, telling officers: "There was no male in the hospital, therefore the rape could not have happened."
Does the Scottish government think that gaslighting rape victims is the new progressive future?
It's just ignorance. Our sexual offences legislation is gender neutral and there is no reason why a woman with a penis could not be found guilty of rape.
That is my understanding too.
Quite why such a serious sexual assault was not taken seriously by hospital staff is unclear. It doesn't matter what gender or sex the attacker and victim were, a sexual assault is a sexual assault.
‘Guidance for Scotland’s biggest health board also says that any woman who complains about a transwoman sharing their ward should be advised that “the ward is indeed female-only and that there are no men present”.’
Unbelievable, Sturgeon and her cohorts have a lot to answer for.
It’s already led to cases like this in the NHS (location not disclosed):
A patient who was raped by a transgender woman on a hospital ward could not have been raped because her attacker is defined as a woman, heard the House of Lords.
Police were told by hospital staff that the reported incident was not true, telling officers: "There was no male in the hospital, therefore the rape could not have happened."
Does the Scottish government think that gaslighting rape victims is the new progressive future?
It's just ignorance. Our sexual offences legislation is gender neutral and there is no reason why a woman with a penis could not be found guilty of rape.
Its not just ignorance. Its also a safeguarding issue as to why a single-sex area had anyone with a penis in it?
No surprise that PB's pub bore posts moronic shit like this:
"About two centuries before the British took India, the racist supremacist Muslim Mughals took India, and built pyramids out of skulls. The Mughals were far far worse than the British. By some estimates they killed 40-80 million Indians. Others go higher"
This is how the site you link to describes itself (these are the site's own words) -
Truncile.com, owned by Trunicle India Pvt. Ltd., derived from True Chronicles, is a pro nationalist opinion and news portal, launched in July 2020. Trunicle focuses on topics that are related to India policy, governance and current affairs. It also focuses on publishing positive & development oriented articles for youth who today struggle to find relevant material online. Trunicle does this by empowering individuals to come and raise their voice for what is RIGHT. (emphasis mine)
Umm. And have you read about what he wrote in later life, which is discredited.
@hyufd. Just to add to my post - You wouldn't quote David Irving, would you, about the Holocaust so it is worth checking what and who you are quoting. Just because it is on the internet, it doesn't make it correct. Something I have mentioned to you a few times. Leon should bear that in mind also.
Well the vast majority of historians agree the Holocaust happened unlike Irving.
Show me evidence then of historians who disprove Professor Lal's claims? Irving of course was just an author, he did not even have a PhD and certainly was never a Professor unlike Lal
‘Guidance for Scotland’s biggest health board also says that any woman who complains about a transwoman sharing their ward should be advised that “the ward is indeed female-only and that there are no men present”.’
Unbelievable, Sturgeon and her cohorts have a lot to answer for.
It’s already led to cases like this in the NHS (location not disclosed):
A patient who was raped by a transgender woman on a hospital ward could not have been raped because her attacker is defined as a woman, heard the House of Lords.
Police were told by hospital staff that the reported incident was not true, telling officers: "There was no male in the hospital, therefore the rape could not have happened."
Does the Scottish government think that gaslighting rape victims is the new progressive future?
It's just ignorance. Our sexual offences legislation is gender neutral and there is no reason why a woman with a penis could not be found guilty of rape.
It doesn't matter what gender or sex the attacker and victim were, a sexual assault is a sexual assault.
So keeping people with a penis out of women’s wards would be a good start…
England 1.11 to make the runs. I’d half forgotten how much fun betting in-play on cricket could be, since Betfair closed my account a couple of years back.
An illustration of the mess the Scottish Government has got itself into:
The Equality Act just contains one definition of ‘sex’, just contains one definition of ‘woman’, just contains one definition of ‘man’. And the structure of the Act supposes that the same concept applies across the Act, so when it uses ‘sex’ in one section, it means the same thing throughout the Act. Similarly when it says ‘woman’ in one particular provision it means it throughout the Act.
But what the Scottish Ministers are now saying is that sometimes ‘woman’ means a biological woman in the Act, but other times, it means a biological woman plus a biological man who has a GRC. And that’s what worries me most of all about this massive shift in position, is that it’s a prescription for chaos. The Scottish Ministers have abandoned any coherent principle of statutory interpretation. All they have said is, if it doesn’t make sense to us when faced up with the implications of what they’re saying, then with one leap, oh, it’s a Section 9(3) understanding of sex, so biology still applies here. Now, that is not a position which is based on any kind of statutory interpretation. And that’s what we are about here. The law needs to be interpreted in a coherent and consistent fashion, not just for and among lawyers, but for those who have to apply the law.
An illustration of the mess the Scottish Government has got itself into:
The Equality Act just contains one definition of ‘sex’, just contains one definition of ‘woman’, just contains one definition of ‘man’. And the structure of the Act supposes that the same concept applies across the Act, so when it uses ‘sex’ in one section, it means the same thing throughout the Act. Similarly when it says ‘woman’ in one particular provision it means it throughout the Act.
But what the Scottish Ministers are now saying is that sometimes ‘woman’ means a biological woman in the Act, but other times, it means a biological woman plus a biological man who has a GRC. And that’s what worries me most of all about this massive shift in position, is that it’s a prescription for chaos. The Scottish Ministers have abandoned any coherent principle of statutory interpretation. All they have said is, if it doesn’t make sense to us when faced up with the implications of what they’re saying, then with one leap, oh, it’s a Section 9(3) understanding of sex, so biology still applies here. Now, that is not a position which is based on any kind of statutory interpretation. And that’s what we are about here. The law needs to be interpreted in a coherent and consistent fashion, not just for and among lawyers, but for those who have to apply the law.
More to the point the Equality Act is UK legislation and it is not open for the Scottish government to argue it has a different meaning in Scotland. They have already lost cases on the basis of this.
On topic, if Johnson isn't the answer, then the answer must be Truss. She has bounced back before and it's only a matter of time before the Conservative Party starts to have buyer's remorse about Sunak. Her fearless approach to the problems that faced us was jettisoned far too fast. I still think she will lead the Tories into the next election and win, handsomely at that.
Just a quick one for Phil since he's about this morning:
As you know I'm pro bitcoin (for the same reason I'm pro gold - I believe in private, i.e. non state issued money as a means of reining in central banks and infinite money printing). But even I'm shocked at the level of scamminess coming out of the FTX scandal.
For me, if someone builds a giant scam/ponzi on the back of gold, for example ("give me your gold and I'll give you 10% more back next month") it doesn't make gold itself a scam, it's just a scam built on gold... but wowza. FTX. Sam Bankman-Fried looking a lot like the new Elizabeth Holmes, and I honestly don't blame you at this point for saying it's all a giant scam.
For me, the underlying tech isn't a scam, self custody isn't a scam, but the sheer level of f***ery that's now coming out about FTX and some of the other players in the market goes beyond ponzi and into outright theft.
It really is little wonder you believe the whole thing is a scam. As I say, if you build a scam on the back of gold, gold itself isn't a scam. But if 99% of the players in the gold market were scam artists, I think it's a pretty legitimate position to take.
‘Guidance for Scotland’s biggest health board also says that any woman who complains about a transwoman sharing their ward should be advised that “the ward is indeed female-only and that there are no men present”.’
Unbelievable, Sturgeon and her cohorts have a lot to answer for.
It’s already led to cases like this in the NHS (location not disclosed):
A patient who was raped by a transgender woman on a hospital ward could not have been raped because her attacker is defined as a woman, heard the House of Lords.
Police were told by hospital staff that the reported incident was not true, telling officers: "There was no male in the hospital, therefore the rape could not have happened."
Does the Scottish government think that gaslighting rape victims is the new progressive future?
It's just ignorance. Our sexual offences legislation is gender neutral and there is no reason why a woman with a penis could not be found guilty of rape.
It doesn't matter what gender or sex the attacker and victim were, a sexual assault is a sexual assault.
So keeping people with a penis out of women’s wards would be a good start…
More that protecting all patients from assaults by other patients would be a good start.
But despite the result it was a great experience anyway. Also though it didn't seem great at the time, it was good in hindsight to have seen McGrath and Warne bowling in their prime. They just seemed unplayable.
HYUFD has form for posting anti-vaxx nonsense on this site as part of his never-ending quest to refuse losing an argument.
When have I ever posted anti vaxx information? Never so don't lie
I remember in September 2021 you posted some utter bollocks about Bill Gates and the vaccine that Robert called you out on and you refused to back down on.
Just a quick one for Phil since he's about this morning:
As you know I'm pro bitcoin (for the same reason I'm pro gold - I believe in private, i.e. non state issued money as a means of reining in central banks and infinite money printing). But even I'm shocked at the level of scamminess coming out of the FTX scandal.
For me, if someone builds a giant scam/ponzi on the back of gold, for example ("give me your gold and I'll give you 10% more back next month") it doesn't make gold itself a scam, it's just a scam built on gold... but wowza. FTX. Sam Bankman-Fried looking a lot like the new Elizabeth Holmes, and I honestly don't blame you at this point for saying it's all a giant scam.
For me, the underlying tech isn't a scam, self custody isn't a scam, but the sheer level of f***ery that's now coming out about FTX and some of the other players in the market goes beyond ponzi and into outright theft.
It really is little wonder you believe the whole thing is a scam. As I say, if you build a scam on the back of gold, gold itself isn't a scam. But if 99% of the players in the gold market were scam artists, I think it's a pretty legitimate position to take.
Correct. Bitcoin itself isn’t a scam. What’s important is to have your own wallet address, because almost everyone talking about or dealing in Bitcoin or cryptocurrencies, appear to be somewhat less than totally honest.
Just a quick one for Phil since he's about this morning:
As you know I'm pro bitcoin (for the same reason I'm pro gold - I believe in private, i.e. non state issued money as a means of reining in central banks and infinite money printing). But even I'm shocked at the level of scamminess coming out of the FTX scandal.
For me, if someone builds a giant scam/ponzi on the back of gold, for example ("give me your gold and I'll give you 10% more back next month") it doesn't make gold itself a scam, it's just a scam built on gold... but wowza. FTX. Sam Bankman-Fried looking a lot like the new Elizabeth Holmes, and I honestly don't blame you at this point for saying it's all a giant scam.
For me, the underlying tech isn't a scam, self custody isn't a scam, but the sheer level of f***ery that's now coming out about FTX and some of the other players in the market goes beyond ponzi and into outright theft.
It really is little wonder you believe the whole thing is a scam. As I say, if you build a scam on the back of gold, gold itself isn't a scam. But if 99% of the players in the gold market were scam artists, I think it's a pretty legitimate position to take.
Thank you and kudos for you to put your hands up and say that.
Yes, I've said repeatedly that the technology itself certainly could have legitimate uses, but the market that exists atm has been taken over by scammers not the technology.
With that post you and I now seem to be on the exact same page, and I wasn't expecting that so soon. Credit to you for that, its not often people say things like that.
‘Guidance for Scotland’s biggest health board also says that any woman who complains about a transwoman sharing their ward should be advised that “the ward is indeed female-only and that there are no men present”.’
Unbelievable, Sturgeon and her cohorts have a lot to answer for.
It’s already led to cases like this in the NHS (location not disclosed):
A patient who was raped by a transgender woman on a hospital ward could not have been raped because her attacker is defined as a woman, heard the House of Lords.
Police were told by hospital staff that the reported incident was not true, telling officers: "There was no male in the hospital, therefore the rape could not have happened."
Does the Scottish government think that gaslighting rape victims is the new progressive future?
It's just ignorance. Our sexual offences legislation is gender neutral and there is no reason why a woman with a penis could not be found guilty of rape.
It doesn't matter what gender or sex the attacker and victim were, a sexual assault is a sexual assault.
So keeping people with a penis out of women’s wards would be a good start…
More that protecting all patients from assaults by other patients would be a good start.
Single sex wards are meant to do that. Letting a man playing dress up into a female ward has resulted in a woman being raped. The solution is to not let men playing dress up into women's wards.
But despite the result it was a great experience anyway. Also though it didn't seem great at the time, it was good in hindsight to have seen McGrath and Warne bowling in their prime. They just seemed unplayable.
Cool. The place it reminds me of most, is the Camp Nou in Barcelona. A cauldron of noise. I was there in 2002, while working on a project in the city, to watch Liverpool hold the hosts to a draw. Sitting in the wrong end of course, with a jumper over the red shirt. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/champions_league/1868466.stm
RRR is rapidly creeping back up which is putting pressure on the wickets though.
When you only need to turn over a run a ball its a lot simpler, but back up to over 8 per over now.
Two boundaries sorts that. But we have to knock them
Need many more than 2 now.
Even getting a boundary that over, the RRR crept up a little bit further, whereas if we'd kept it to a run a ball it would have shrank. The RRR and wickets is adding to the pressure respectively.
No surprise that PB's pub bore posts moronic shit like this:
"About two centuries before the British took India, the racist supremacist Muslim Mughals took India, and built pyramids out of skulls. The Mughals were far far worse than the British. By some estimates they killed 40-80 million Indians. Others go higher"
This is how the site you link to describes itself (these are the site's own words) -
Truncile.com, owned by Trunicle India Pvt. Ltd., derived from True Chronicles, is a pro nationalist opinion and news portal, launched in July 2020. Trunicle focuses on topics that are related to India policy, governance and current affairs. It also focuses on publishing positive & development oriented articles for youth who today struggle to find relevant material online. Trunicle does this by empowering individuals to come and raise their voice for what is RIGHT. (emphasis mine)
Umm. And have you read about what he wrote in later life, which is discredited.
@hyufd. Just to add to my post - You wouldn't quote David Irving, would you, about the Holocaust so it is worth checking what and who you are quoting. Just because it is on the internet, it doesn't make it correct. Something I have mentioned to you a few times. Leon should bear that in mind also.
Well the vast majority of historians agree the Holocaust happened unlike Irving.
Show me evidence then of historians who disprove Professor Lal's claims? Irving of course was just an author, he did not even have a PhD and certainly was never a Professor unlike Lal
There are critiques of Prof Lal's work in terms of numbers on the quite obvious grounds of the lack of decent census data on medieval India before and after the arrival of Islam.
This is not an idle piece of historical analysis, but a very active political agenda in India. The Hindutva activists use it as a way to stir up communal violence. We saw some of that in my City in September.
HYUFD has form for posting anti-vaxx nonsense on this site as part of his never-ending quest to refuse losing an argument.
When have I ever posted anti vaxx information? Never so don't lie
I remember in September 2021 you posted some utter bollocks about Bill Gates and the vaccine that Robert called you out on and you refused to back down on.
It was not anti vaccine, it was pointing out concerns over Gates' pushing monopoly patent rights.
In the developing world issues like that have delayed access to vaccines
HYUFD has form for posting anti-vaxx nonsense on this site as part of his never-ending quest to refuse losing an argument.
When have I ever posted anti vaxx information? Never so don't lie
I remember in September 2021 you posted some utter bollocks about Bill Gates and the vaccine that Robert called you out on and you refused to back down on.
It was not anti vaccine, it was pointing out concerns over Gates' pushing monopoly patent rights.
In the developing world issues like that have delayed access to vaccines
The stuff Gates is doing with food and medicine, is very worrying.
‘Guidance for Scotland’s biggest health board also says that any woman who complains about a transwoman sharing their ward should be advised that “the ward is indeed female-only and that there are no men present”.’
Unbelievable, Sturgeon and her cohorts have a lot to answer for.
It’s already led to cases like this in the NHS (location not disclosed):
A patient who was raped by a transgender woman on a hospital ward could not have been raped because her attacker is defined as a woman, heard the House of Lords.
Police were told by hospital staff that the reported incident was not true, telling officers: "There was no male in the hospital, therefore the rape could not have happened."
Does the Scottish government think that gaslighting rape victims is the new progressive future?
It's just ignorance. Our sexual offences legislation is gender neutral and there is no reason why a woman with a penis could not be found guilty of rape.
It doesn't matter what gender or sex the attacker and victim were, a sexual assault is a sexual assault.
So keeping people with a penis out of women’s wards would be a good start…
More that protecting all patients from assaults by other patients would be a good start.
Since 98% of sexual assault convictions are committed by people with penises, do you think that might be a place to start?
HYUFD has form for posting anti-vaxx nonsense on this site as part of his never-ending quest to refuse losing an argument.
When have I ever posted anti vaxx information? Never so don't lie
I remember in September 2021 you posted some utter bollocks about Bill Gates and the vaccine that Robert called you out on and you refused to back down on.
It was not anti vaccine, it was pointing out concerns over Gates' pushing monopoly patent rights.
In the developing world issues like that have delayed access to vaccines
The stuff Gates is doing with food and medicine, is very worrying.
With medicine he seems to have done a lot to help the developing world.
With food, I don't see anything positive in what he's doing. Buying up vast tracts of land is rather concerning.
HYUFD has form for posting anti-vaxx nonsense on this site as part of his never-ending quest to refuse losing an argument.
When have I ever posted anti vaxx information? Never so don't lie
I remember in September 2021 you posted some utter bollocks about Bill Gates and the vaccine that Robert called you out on and you refused to back down on.
It was not anti vaccine, it was pointing out concerns over Gates' pushing monopoly patent rights.
In the developing world issues like that have delayed access to vaccines
The stuff Gates is doing with food and medicine, is very worrying.
Did Nigel Farage get a place in today's commemoration at the Cenotaph in the end, by dint of being leader of Reform UK? Last I heard he was saying he wanted to come.
‘Guidance for Scotland’s biggest health board also says that any woman who complains about a transwoman sharing their ward should be advised that “the ward is indeed female-only and that there are no men present”.’
Unbelievable, Sturgeon and her cohorts have a lot to answer for.
It’s already led to cases like this in the NHS (location not disclosed):
A patient who was raped by a transgender woman on a hospital ward could not have been raped because her attacker is defined as a woman, heard the House of Lords.
Police were told by hospital staff that the reported incident was not true, telling officers: "There was no male in the hospital, therefore the rape could not have happened."
Does the Scottish government think that gaslighting rape victims is the new progressive future?
It's just ignorance. Our sexual offences legislation is gender neutral and there is no reason why a woman with a penis could not be found guilty of rape.
It doesn't matter what gender or sex the attacker and victim were, a sexual assault is a sexual assault.
So keeping people with a penis out of women’s wards would be a good start…
More that protecting all patients from assaults by other patients would be a good start.
Since 98% of sexual assault convictions are committed by people with penises, do you think that might be a place to start?
No.
Women hospital patients should be allowed to be visited by males under the same rules as any patient being visited by anyone.
Did Nigel Farage get a place in today's commemoration at the Cenotaph in the end, by dint of being leader of Reform UK? Last I heard he was saying he wanted to come.
He isn't leader of Reform or any other political party. The leader is Richard Tice. And given they have no elected representatives in Parliament I don't see why they should be present any more than the Monster Raving Loony Party.
‘Guidance for Scotland’s biggest health board also says that any woman who complains about a transwoman sharing their ward should be advised that “the ward is indeed female-only and that there are no men present”.’
Unbelievable, Sturgeon and her cohorts have a lot to answer for.
It’s already led to cases like this in the NHS (location not disclosed):
A patient who was raped by a transgender woman on a hospital ward could not have been raped because her attacker is defined as a woman, heard the House of Lords.
Police were told by hospital staff that the reported incident was not true, telling officers: "There was no male in the hospital, therefore the rape could not have happened."
Does the Scottish government think that gaslighting rape victims is the new progressive future?
It's just ignorance. Our sexual offences legislation is gender neutral and there is no reason why a woman with a penis could not be found guilty of rape.
It doesn't matter what gender or sex the attacker and victim were, a sexual assault is a sexual assault.
So keeping people with a penis out of women’s wards would be a good start…
More that protecting all patients from assaults by other patients would be a good start.
Yes, and protecting all patients would entail taking the most obvious, time tested and value-for-money precautions, like penis yes/no ward discrimination, would it not?
An illustration of the mess the Scottish Government has got itself into:
The Equality Act just contains one definition of ‘sex’, just contains one definition of ‘woman’, just contains one definition of ‘man’. And the structure of the Act supposes that the same concept applies across the Act, so when it uses ‘sex’ in one section, it means the same thing throughout the Act. Similarly when it says ‘woman’ in one particular provision it means it throughout the Act.
But what the Scottish Ministers are now saying is that sometimes ‘woman’ means a biological woman in the Act, but other times, it means a biological woman plus a biological man who has a GRC. And that’s what worries me most of all about this massive shift in position, is that it’s a prescription for chaos. The Scottish Ministers have abandoned any coherent principle of statutory interpretation. All they have said is, if it doesn’t make sense to us when faced up with the implications of what they’re saying, then with one leap, oh, it’s a Section 9(3) understanding of sex, so biology still applies here. Now, that is not a position which is based on any kind of statutory interpretation. And that’s what we are about here. The law needs to be interpreted in a coherent and consistent fashion, not just for and among lawyers, but for those who have to apply the law.
They are such a useless bunch , greedy , weird self seeking arseholes. There ar eno redeeming factors in a cabinet of 2nd rate duffers who are just Sturgeon butt licking troughers. Their other good one is they can self id as disabled.
Did Nigel Farage get a place in today's commemoration at the Cenotaph in the end, by dint of being leader of Reform UK? Last I heard he was saying he wanted to come.
He was ranting about an Albanian flag draped over the Churchill statue
Just a quick one for Phil since he's about this morning:
As you know I'm pro bitcoin (for the same reason I'm pro gold - I believe in private, i.e. non state issued money as a means of reining in central banks and infinite money printing). But even I'm shocked at the level of scamminess coming out of the FTX scandal.
For me, if someone builds a giant scam/ponzi on the back of gold, for example ("give me your gold and I'll give you 10% more back next month") it doesn't make gold itself a scam, it's just a scam built on gold... but wowza. FTX. Sam Bankman-Fried looking a lot like the new Elizabeth Holmes, and I honestly don't blame you at this point for saying it's all a giant scam.
For me, the underlying tech isn't a scam, self custody isn't a scam, but the sheer level of f***ery that's now coming out about FTX and some of the other players in the market goes beyond ponzi and into outright theft.
It really is little wonder you believe the whole thing is a scam. As I say, if you build a scam on the back of gold, gold itself isn't a scam. But if 99% of the players in the gold market were scam artists, I think it's a pretty legitimate position to take.
For anyone not following this, which would be a sane decision, today custodial exchanges have been under pressure to provide an attestation that they have all the cybercoins they say they do. To accomplish this they've been following the practice set by the Bitfinex/Tether exchange and borrowing coins from each other, doing the attestation then sending them back.
Did Nigel Farage get a place in today's commemoration at the Cenotaph in the end, by dint of being leader of Reform UK? Last I heard he was saying he wanted to come.
He isn't leader of Reform or any other political party. The leader is Richard Tice. And given they have no elected representatives in Parliament I don't see why they should be present any more than the Monster Raving Loony Party.
Sorry - I was getting confused. I took it into my head that an article from several years ago was recent. Agreed there's no good reason to invite him.
‘Guidance for Scotland’s biggest health board also says that any woman who complains about a transwoman sharing their ward should be advised that “the ward is indeed female-only and that there are no men present”.’
Unbelievable, Sturgeon and her cohorts have a lot to answer for.
It’s already led to cases like this in the NHS (location not disclosed):
A patient who was raped by a transgender woman on a hospital ward could not have been raped because her attacker is defined as a woman, heard the House of Lords.
Police were told by hospital staff that the reported incident was not true, telling officers: "There was no male in the hospital, therefore the rape could not have happened."
Does the Scottish government think that gaslighting rape victims is the new progressive future?
It's just ignorance. Our sexual offences legislation is gender neutral and there is no reason why a woman with a penis could not be found guilty of rape.
It doesn't matter what gender or sex the attacker and victim were, a sexual assault is a sexual assault.
So keeping people with a penis out of women’s wards would be a good start…
More that protecting all patients from assaults by other patients would be a good start.
Yes, and protecting all patients would entail taking the most obvious, time tested and value-for-money precautions, like penis yes/no ward discrimination, would it not?
Absolute brain fart of a post.
Penis discrimination is exactly the same as calling all trans people rapists
No surprise that PB's pub bore posts moronic shit like this:
"About two centuries before the British took India, the racist supremacist Muslim Mughals took India, and built pyramids out of skulls. The Mughals were far far worse than the British. By some estimates they killed 40-80 million Indians. Others go higher"
This is how the site you link to describes itself (these are the site's own words) -
Truncile.com, owned by Trunicle India Pvt. Ltd., derived from True Chronicles, is a pro nationalist opinion and news portal, launched in July 2020. Trunicle focuses on topics that are related to India policy, governance and current affairs. It also focuses on publishing positive & development oriented articles for youth who today struggle to find relevant material online. Trunicle does this by empowering individuals to come and raise their voice for what is RIGHT. (emphasis mine)
Umm. And have you read about what he wrote in later life, which is discredited.
@hyufd. Just to add to my post - You wouldn't quote David Irving, would you, about the Holocaust so it is worth checking what and who you are quoting. Just because it is on the internet, it doesn't make it correct. Something I have mentioned to you a few times. Leon should bear that in mind also.
Well the vast majority of historians agree the Holocaust happened unlike Irving.
Show me evidence then of historians who disprove Professor Lal's claims? Irving of course was just an author, he did not even have a PhD and certainly was never a Professor unlike Lal
Well you don't have to look far. Just read his Wikipedia page and there are lots of references of others calling him out on his later works. Some very strongly. You can't pick and choose your internet sources.
Did Nigel Farage get a place in today's commemoration at the Cenotaph in the end, by dint of being leader of Reform UK? Last I heard he was saying he wanted to come.
He was ranting about an Albanian flag draped over the Churchill statue
‘Guidance for Scotland’s biggest health board also says that any woman who complains about a transwoman sharing their ward should be advised that “the ward is indeed female-only and that there are no men present”.’
Unbelievable, Sturgeon and her cohorts have a lot to answer for.
It’s already led to cases like this in the NHS (location not disclosed):
A patient who was raped by a transgender woman on a hospital ward could not have been raped because her attacker is defined as a woman, heard the House of Lords.
Police were told by hospital staff that the reported incident was not true, telling officers: "There was no male in the hospital, therefore the rape could not have happened."
Does the Scottish government think that gaslighting rape victims is the new progressive future?
It's just ignorance. Our sexual offences legislation is gender neutral and there is no reason why a woman with a penis could not be found guilty of rape.
It doesn't matter what gender or sex the attacker and victim were, a sexual assault is a sexual assault.
So keeping people with a penis out of women’s wards would be a good start…
More that protecting all patients from assaults by other patients would be a good start.
Since 98% of sexual assault convictions are committed by people with penises, do you think that might be a place to start?
It may well put Trans-women at risk. This does sound to have been an incident on a psychiatric ward. As per prisons, I think Trans-people who are either threat or at risk of sexual assault should be individually risk assessed and mitigations arranged, such as sideroom with ensuite toilet facilities.
In a general medical setting we do not segregate sexes in outpatients, daycase or investigation suites. There are also many mixed wards, where a single speciality manages patients of both sexes, with separation by use of bays and siderooms.
No surprise that PB's pub bore posts moronic shit like this:
"About two centuries before the British took India, the racist supremacist Muslim Mughals took India, and built pyramids out of skulls. The Mughals were far far worse than the British. By some estimates they killed 40-80 million Indians. Others go higher"
This is how the site you link to describes itself (these are the site's own words) -
Truncile.com, owned by Trunicle India Pvt. Ltd., derived from True Chronicles, is a pro nationalist opinion and news portal, launched in July 2020. Trunicle focuses on topics that are related to India policy, governance and current affairs. It also focuses on publishing positive & development oriented articles for youth who today struggle to find relevant material online. Trunicle does this by empowering individuals to come and raise their voice for what is RIGHT. (emphasis mine)
Umm. And have you read about what he wrote in later life, which is discredited.
@hyufd. Just to add to my post - You wouldn't quote David Irving, would you, about the Holocaust so it is worth checking what and who you are quoting. Just because it is on the internet, it doesn't make it correct. Something I have mentioned to you a few times. Leon should bear that in mind also.
Well the vast majority of historians agree the Holocaust happened unlike Irving.
Show me evidence then of historians who disprove Professor Lal's claims? Irving of course was just an author, he did not even have a PhD and certainly was never a Professor unlike Lal
Well you don't have to look far. Just read his Wikipedia page and there are lots of references of others calling him out on his later works. Some very strongly. You can't pick and choose your internet sources.
Professor Jeremy Black formerly of Exeter University and now at the US Foreign Policy Institute regards Lal as a good scholar only considered rightwing by Indian Muslim Marxist historians, which says something
Did Nigel Farage get a place in today's commemoration at the Cenotaph in the end, by dint of being leader of Reform UK? Last I heard he was saying he wanted to come.
He was ranting about an Albanian flag draped over the Churchill statue
Did Nigel Farage get a place in today's commemoration at the Cenotaph in the end, by dint of being leader of Reform UK? Last I heard he was saying he wanted to come.
He was ranting about an Albanian flag draped over the Churchill statue
That performance against India deserved that World Cup. Whoopoohooooo!
Yes, that was a format changing performance. All the old stuff about setting a base, watching wickets in the power play etc etc just in the bin. Attack from ball 1 and keep going. Not a backward step.
‘Guidance for Scotland’s biggest health board also says that any woman who complains about a transwoman sharing their ward should be advised that “the ward is indeed female-only and that there are no men present”.’
Unbelievable, Sturgeon and her cohorts have a lot to answer for.
It’s already led to cases like this in the NHS (location not disclosed):
A patient who was raped by a transgender woman on a hospital ward could not have been raped because her attacker is defined as a woman, heard the House of Lords.
Police were told by hospital staff that the reported incident was not true, telling officers: "There was no male in the hospital, therefore the rape could not have happened."
Does the Scottish government think that gaslighting rape victims is the new progressive future?
It's just ignorance. Our sexual offences legislation is gender neutral and there is no reason why a woman with a penis could not be found guilty of rape.
It doesn't matter what gender or sex the attacker and victim were, a sexual assault is a sexual assault.
So keeping people with a penis out of women’s wards would be a good start…
More that protecting all patients from assaults by other patients would be a good start.
Since 98% of sexual assault convictions are committed by people with penises, do you think that might be a place to start?
‘Guidance for Scotland’s biggest health board also says that any woman who complains about a transwoman sharing their ward should be advised that “the ward is indeed female-only and that there are no men present”.’
Unbelievable, Sturgeon and her cohorts have a lot to answer for.
It’s already led to cases like this in the NHS (location not disclosed):
A patient who was raped by a transgender woman on a hospital ward could not have been raped because her attacker is defined as a woman, heard the House of Lords.
Police were told by hospital staff that the reported incident was not true, telling officers: "There was no male in the hospital, therefore the rape could not have happened."
Does the Scottish government think that gaslighting rape victims is the new progressive future?
It's just ignorance. Our sexual offences legislation is gender neutral and there is no reason why a woman with a penis could not be found guilty of rape.
It doesn't matter what gender or sex the attacker and victim were, a sexual assault is a sexual assault.
So keeping people with a penis out of women’s wards would be a good start…
More that protecting all patients from assaults by other patients would be a good start.
Since 98% of sexual assault convictions are committed by people with penises, do you think that might be a place to start?
It may well put Trans-women at risk.
So Trans women are at risk from men?
Yes. Does that surprise you?
Imagine being a trans-woman in a male prison, or psychiatric facility.
No surprise that PB's pub bore posts moronic shit like this:
"About two centuries before the British took India, the racist supremacist Muslim Mughals took India, and built pyramids out of skulls. The Mughals were far far worse than the British. By some estimates they killed 40-80 million Indians. Others go higher"
This is how the site you link to describes itself (these are the site's own words) -
Truncile.com, owned by Trunicle India Pvt. Ltd., derived from True Chronicles, is a pro nationalist opinion and news portal, launched in July 2020. Trunicle focuses on topics that are related to India policy, governance and current affairs. It also focuses on publishing positive & development oriented articles for youth who today struggle to find relevant material online. Trunicle does this by empowering individuals to come and raise their voice for what is RIGHT. (emphasis mine)
They are a load of Hindu nationalist nonsense. Aside from noting that the total is given for thirteen centuries, it’s absurd to term what were wars between states of multiple kinds, over many centuries, as an ‘islamic genocide’ of Hindus. And accepting at face value casualty figures from so long ago is pitiful history.
I’d also note that the mainly Hindu population of India grew at a historically unprecedented rate under Mughal rule.
‘Guidance for Scotland’s biggest health board also says that any woman who complains about a transwoman sharing their ward should be advised that “the ward is indeed female-only and that there are no men present”.’
Unbelievable, Sturgeon and her cohorts have a lot to answer for.
It’s already led to cases like this in the NHS (location not disclosed):
A patient who was raped by a transgender woman on a hospital ward could not have been raped because her attacker is defined as a woman, heard the House of Lords.
Police were told by hospital staff that the reported incident was not true, telling officers: "There was no male in the hospital, therefore the rape could not have happened."
Does the Scottish government think that gaslighting rape victims is the new progressive future?
It's just ignorance. Our sexual offences legislation is gender neutral and there is no reason why a woman with a penis could not be found guilty of rape.
It doesn't matter what gender or sex the attacker and victim were, a sexual assault is a sexual assault.
So keeping people with a penis out of women’s wards would be a good start…
More that protecting all patients from assaults by other patients would be a good start.
Since 98% of sexual assault convictions are committed by people with penises, do you think that might be a place to start?
It may well put Trans-women at risk.
So Trans women are at risk from men?
Yes. Does that surprise you?
Imagine being a trans-woman in a male prison, or psychiatric facility.
I notice you deleted the "other" as in "other men".
So the solution is to put biological women at risk from Trans Women?
Pop quiz. What are the relative sexual assault offending rates between women, men and Trans women? One is very different from the other two. Two cluster closely.
Talk of SPotY reminds me of Time Person of the Year, and whether after the mid-terms, Joe Biden is now a contender, but no-one seems to be betting on it, probably because President Zelensky has looked home and hosed since the SMO.
Just a quick one for Phil since he's about this morning:
As you know I'm pro bitcoin (for the same reason I'm pro gold - I believe in private, i.e. non state issued money as a means of reining in central banks and infinite money printing). But even I'm shocked at the level of scamminess coming out of the FTX scandal.
For me, if someone builds a giant scam/ponzi on the back of gold, for example ("give me your gold and I'll give you 10% more back next month") it doesn't make gold itself a scam, it's just a scam built on gold... but wowza. FTX. Sam Bankman-Fried looking a lot like the new Elizabeth Holmes, and I honestly don't blame you at this point for saying it's all a giant scam.
For me, the underlying tech isn't a scam, self custody isn't a scam, but the sheer level of f***ery that's now coming out about FTX and some of the other players in the market goes beyond ponzi and into outright theft.
It really is little wonder you believe the whole thing is a scam. As I say, if you build a scam on the back of gold, gold itself isn't a scam. But if 99% of the players in the gold market were scam artists, I think it's a pretty legitimate position to take.
For anyone not following this, which would be a sane decision, today custodial exchanges have been under pressure to provide an attestation that they have all the cybercoins they say they do. To accomplish this they've been following the practice set by the Bitfinex/Tether exchange and borrowing coins from each other, doing the attestation then sending them back.
Talk of SPotY reminds me of Time Person of the Year, and whether after the mid-terms, Joe Biden is now a contender, but no-one seems to be betting on it, probably because President Zelensky has looked home and hosed since the SMO.
For this speech alone:
"Read lips: Without gas or without you? Without you. Without light or without you? Without you. Without water or without you? Without you. Without food or without you? Without you.
"Cold, hunger, darkness and thirst are not as terrible and deadly for us as your "friendship and brotherhood."
Hunt says everyone is going to have to pay more tax. Rachel Reeves says everyone, particularly "higher earners", will have to pay even more tax.
Maybe it's time I looked again at moving to Canada or Australia. My tits are clearly going to be squeezed till they're purple if I stay here and my job is hard and stressful enough as it is.
No surprise that PB's pub bore posts moronic shit like this:
"About two centuries before the British took India, the racist supremacist Muslim Mughals took India, and built pyramids out of skulls. The Mughals were far far worse than the British. By some estimates they killed 40-80 million Indians. Others go higher"
This is how the site you link to describes itself (these are the site's own words) -
Truncile.com, owned by Trunicle India Pvt. Ltd., derived from True Chronicles, is a pro nationalist opinion and news portal, launched in July 2020. Trunicle focuses on topics that are related to India policy, governance and current affairs. It also focuses on publishing positive & development oriented articles for youth who today struggle to find relevant material online. Trunicle does this by empowering individuals to come and raise their voice for what is RIGHT. (emphasis mine)
Umm. And have you read about what he wrote in later life, which is discredited.
@hyufd. Just to add to my post - You wouldn't quote David Irving, would you, about the Holocaust so it is worth checking what and who you are quoting. Just because it is on the internet, it doesn't make it correct. Something I have mentioned to you a few times. Leon should bear that in mind also.
Well the vast majority of historians agree the Holocaust happened unlike Irving.
Show me evidence then of historians who disprove Professor Lal's claims? Irving of course was just an author, he did not even have a PhD and certainly was never a Professor unlike Lal
There are critiques of Prof Lal's work in terms of numbers on the quite obvious grounds of the lack of decent census data on medieval India before and after the arrival of Islam.
This is not an idle piece of historical analysis, but a very active political agenda in India. The Hindutva activists use it as a way to stir up communal violence. We saw some of that in my City in September.
HYUFD is an activist in a party which actively tries to suppress historical debate and to force schools to use dodgy old textbooks. I mean, 'My Island Story'. WTF!?!
Comments
"I would reject the idea that what has happened in the economy are as a result of the actions that Liz took," says the uber-loyal Truss supporter Simon Clarke.
https://twitter.com/KevinASchofield/status/1591735592882143232
Quite why such a serious sexual assault was not taken seriously by hospital staff is unclear. It doesn't matter what gender or sex the attacker and victim were, a sexual assault is a sexual assault.
Well the vast majority of historians agree the Holocaust happened unlike Irving.
Show me evidence then of historians who disprove Professor Lal's claims? Irving of course was just an author, he did not even have a PhD and certainly was never a Professor unlike Lal
The Equality Act just contains one definition of ‘sex’, just contains one definition of ‘woman’, just contains one definition of ‘man’. And the structure of the Act supposes that the same concept applies across the Act, so when it uses ‘sex’ in one section, it means the same thing throughout the Act. Similarly when it says ‘woman’ in one particular provision it means it throughout the Act.
But what the Scottish Ministers are now saying is that sometimes ‘woman’ means a biological woman in the Act, but other times, it means a biological woman plus a biological man who has a GRC. And that’s what worries me most of all about this massive shift in position, is that it’s a prescription for chaos. The Scottish Ministers have abandoned any coherent principle of statutory interpretation. All they have said is, if it doesn’t make sense to us when faced up with the implications of what they’re saying, then with one leap, oh, it’s a Section 9(3) understanding of sex, so biology still applies here. Now, that is not a position which is based on any kind of statutory interpretation. And that’s what we are about here. The law needs to be interpreted in a coherent and consistent fashion, not just for and among lawyers, but for those who have to apply the law.
https://forwomen.scot/12/11/2022/judicial-review-2-substantive-hearing/
Definite bucket-list stadium to visit.
As you know I'm pro bitcoin (for the same reason I'm pro gold - I believe in private, i.e. non state issued money as a means of reining in central banks and infinite money printing). But even I'm shocked at the level of scamminess coming out of the FTX scandal.
For me, if someone builds a giant scam/ponzi on the back of gold, for example ("give me your gold and I'll give you 10% more back next month") it doesn't make gold itself a scam, it's just a scam built on gold... but wowza. FTX. Sam Bankman-Fried looking a lot like the new Elizabeth Holmes, and I honestly don't blame you at this point for saying it's all a giant scam.
For me, the underlying tech isn't a scam, self custody isn't a scam, but the sheer level of f***ery that's now coming out about FTX and some of the other players in the market goes beyond ponzi and into outright theft.
It really is little wonder you believe the whole thing is a scam. As I say, if you build a scam on the back of gold, gold itself isn't a scam. But if 99% of the players in the gold market were scam artists, I think it's a pretty legitimate position to take.
But despite the result it was a great experience anyway. Also though it didn't seem great at the time, it was good in hindsight to have seen McGrath and Warne bowling in their prime. They just seemed unplayable.
When you only need to turn over a run a ball its a lot simpler, but back up to over 8 per over now.
Mark my words within a decade they'll be stripped off all their titles they won under the ADFG.
Thread.
https://twitter.com/sportingintel/status/1591570024258359296
Yes, I've said repeatedly that the technology itself certainly could have legitimate uses, but the market that exists atm has been taken over by scammers not the technology.
With that post you and I now seem to be on the exact same page, and I wasn't expecting that so soon. Credit to you for that, its not often people say things like that.
I was there in 2002, while working on a project in the city, to watch Liverpool hold the hosts to a draw.
Sitting in the wrong end of course, with a jumper over the red shirt.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/champions_league/1868466.stm
Even getting a boundary that over, the RRR crept up a little bit further, whereas if we'd kept it to a run a ball it would have shrank. The RRR and wickets is adding to the pressure respectively.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Growth_of_Muslim_Population_in_Medieval_India
This is not an idle piece of historical analysis, but a very active political agenda in India. The Hindutva activists use it as a way to stir up communal violence. We saw some of that in my City in September.
In the developing world issues like that have delayed access to vaccines
20 from 22 required.
With food, I don't see anything positive in what he's doing. Buying up vast tracts of land is rather concerning.
https://www.theonion.com/evil-genius-gates-drops-windows-98-into-nyc-water-suppl-1819564734
I thought having Starmer in her phone as Mr Darcy quite witty. The rather stuffy lawyer that you turn to in a crisis when passion let's you down...
https://twitter.com/Marthalanefox/status/1591373351196434432?t=04LYlBgr0Svcj7kMY7aB8w&s=19
Women hospital patients should be allowed to be visited by males under the same rules as any patient being visited by anyone.
Absolute brain fart of a post.
BEN BLOODY STOKES
https://twitter.com/Nigel_Farage/status/1591459999758393344?s=20&t=4MZBktAWO1Madi_nccgtkw
PS If anyone's interested I have a story from when Mt Gox fell over: https://cryptodon.lol/web/@edmundedgar/109328621991453452
About to text some Aussies.
In a general medical setting we do not segregate sexes in outpatients, daycase or investigation suites. There are also many mixed wards, where a single speciality manages patients of both sexes, with separation by use of bays and siderooms.
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=AiZtAgAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/K._S._Lal
https://twitter.com/LouisHenwood/status/1591532804722274304?t=wjUeHI1BhSAPqfBTl7ekTA&s=19
Edit: and player of the tournament!
Imagine being a trans-woman in a male prison, or psychiatric facility.
Aside from noting that the total is given for thirteen centuries, it’s absurd to term what were wars between states of multiple kinds, over many centuries, as an ‘islamic genocide’ of Hindus.
And accepting at face value casualty figures from so long ago is pitiful history.
I’d also note that the mainly Hindu population of India grew at a historically unprecedented rate under Mughal rule.
So the solution is to put biological women at risk from Trans Women?
Pop quiz. What are the relative sexual assault offending rates between women, men and Trans women? One is very different from the other two. Two cluster closely.
"Read lips:
Without gas or without you?
Without you.
Without light or without you?
Without you.
Without water or without you?
Without you.
Without food or without you?
Without you.
"Cold, hunger, darkness and thirst are not as terrible and deadly for us as your "friendship and brotherhood."
Brilliant, brilliant oratory.
Hunt says everyone is going to have to pay more tax. Rachel Reeves says everyone, particularly "higher earners", will have to pay even more tax.
Maybe it's time I looked again at moving to Canada or Australia. My tits are clearly going to be squeezed till they're purple if I stay here and my job is hard and stressful enough as it is.
Looking at Betfair now, there’s only four sportspeople layable at sensible prices:
Beth Mead
Harry Kane
Ben Stokes
Ronnie O’Sullivan.
I reckon the winner isn’t one of those four.
https://www.betfair.com/exchange/special-bets/event/31141809/multi-market?marketIds=1.192647553
For the World Cup to provide a winner it would probably have to be a last-minute winner (as per Wilkinson 2003) or a hat trick in the final.