Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

Bet on Raducanu for SPOTY before tonight’s final – politicalbetting.com

1457910

Comments

  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,232

    Great match 4-4 now

    33 points each in those four games.
  • Options
    FarooqFarooq Posts: 10,775
    ping said:

    carnforth said:

    carnforth said:

    Also says "Cash out £12.91". Do I get the stake back too with that?

    I'd guess that includes the stake.
    Thanks. It is now at £20.12. So I suppose I will cash out if it reaches, say, £30. Thanks PB for the education.
    The general advice, from a pure value perspective, is to never cash out.

    Each time you bet, you pay the bookie overround. Cashing out, rather than waiting for it to settle, means you pay it twice.

    Only cash out if you think the opposite outcome is more likely than the stated odds indicate. Basically, treat each bet as an individual proposition. The +-figure should be meaningless in your calculation.
    exactly this
  • Options
    carnforthcarnforth Posts: 3,207
    ping said:

    carnforth said:

    carnforth said:

    Also says "Cash out £12.91". Do I get the stake back too with that?

    I'd guess that includes the stake.
    Thanks. It is now at £20.12. So I suppose I will cash out if it reaches, say, £30. Thanks PB for the education.
    The general advice, from a pure value perspective, is to never cash out.

    Each time you bet, you pay the bookie overround. Cashing out, rather than waiting for it to settle, means you pay it twice.

    Only cash out if you think the opposite outcome is more likely than the stated odds indicate. Basically, treat each bet as an individual proposition. The +-figure should be meaningless in your calculation.
    Ah, I see. I am paying for the bookmaker's services twice because I am, in effect, betting twice?
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,926
    Cashout at bookies is always total cash.
  • Options
    MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 25,178
    edited September 2021

    Wowsers. To think people laughed at people paying more tax.

    Boris Johnson's National Insurance increase could result in the breakdown of families and deter companies from hiring new staff and increasing wages, according to the Government's own analysis.

    A bombshell impact assessment produced by HM Revenue and Customs for the Treasury warned that one effect of the 1.25 percentage point tax increase "may be an impact on family formation, stability or breakdown as individuals, who are currently just about managing financially, will see their disposable income reduce".

    The disclosure comes as several MPs in Red Wall seats said they faced a major backlash from constituents over the move. One MP said they had received angry letters referring to the levy as the "poll tax 2.0" – a phrase that was also used spontaneously by voters in a focus group in a northern city last week.


    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2021/09/11/poll-tax-20-will-harm-jobs-families-treasurys-experts-admit/

    What is the problem? Doesn't everyone have wealthy benefactors to help out when finances are tight, like when the wife maxxes out the £52,000 credit card limit on curtains and wallpaper?

    More fool them if they don't.
  • Options
    This is magnificent tennis
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,190
    It feels like Fernandez is having to take more risks.
  • Options
    Whoever wins this match will be a worth Champion.
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,965
    tlg86 said:

    Raducanu’s strength is that she pounces on anything slightly short and punishes it.

    Gosh I'm a pervert.
    Thoroughly ashamed I am.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,232
    tlg86 said:

    It feels like Fernandez is having to take more risks.

    Well, she will in the next service game, as one break and she loses the set.

    But I think on the whole she is playing the smarter tennis by being more aggressive. She’s not going to beat somebody playing like Raducanu has played being defensive, is she?
  • Options
    Muge Cevik
    @mugecevik
    ·
    1h
    It’s very irresponsible reporting the number of cases among vaccinated without mentioning the baseline vaccination rates. Your QTs are full of people, who think vaccines don’t work.
    Well done @itvnews
  • Options
    geoffwgeoffw Posts: 8,153
    High octane match. Great advert for wimmins' tennis.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,232
    dixiedean said:

    tlg86 said:

    Raducanu’s strength is that she pounces on anything slightly short and punishes it.

    Gosh I'm a pervert.
    Thoroughly ashamed I am.
    At least you’re not the poster burbling about her legs, @Pulpstar having beaten you to it!
  • Options
    What a return that was by Raducanu. Truly great tennis.
  • Options
    AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    Tonight has been one of the very rare nights where i have successfully bet in-play on a sporting event.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,232
    Fernandez is going to hold here, isn’t she?

    What was that about taking too many risks?
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,745
    Feels like Fernandez has had more errors and that may just sneak it.
  • Options
    Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 26,611
    Raducanu takes the first set 6-4.
  • Options
    MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 25,178
    gealbhan said:

    No lead for Labour in the crucial Oponiumyum. AND ONLY A TEENY DROP FOR THE CONSERVATIVES after the week they have had.
    LAB: 38%
    CON: 38% (-2)
    LDM: 8% (+1)
    GRN: 6% (=)
    SNP: 5% (-1)

    Arch Remainer Starmer can’t win back Red Brex. Labour in trouble at next election. They just weren’t ready for what the Tories were going to do this week to take the chance, Red Brex are back on the Tory Train now.

    Starmer’s blown it!

    You may be right, but please show your workings, otherwise it looks like you are just guessing.
  • Options
    RADUCANU takes first set 6-4!
  • Options
    MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 37,607
    Get in!
  • Options
    IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830
    Yay
  • Options
    Terrific
  • Options
    Pro_RataPro_Rata Posts: 4,811
    That was brutal stuff.

    They've both turned up. What more can you ask for.
  • Options
    RADUCANU!!!!
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,232
    ydoethur said:

    Fernandez is going to hold here, isn’t she?

    What was that about taking too many risks?

    I’ve still got it.

    And Fernandez has more miles in her legs than Raducanu - although given her youth that shouldn’t be a fatal problem for her.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,745
    A 1hr set without even getting to tie break says it all really, evenly matched.
  • Options
    After the first set:-
    Raducanu 1.23
    Fernandez 5.2
  • Options
    MattWMattW Posts: 18,530
    edited September 2021
    tlg86 said:

    Raducanu’s strength is that she pounces on anything slightly short and punishes it.

    Has Big Bad John appeared?
  • Options

    After the first set:-
    Raducanu 1.23
    Fernandez 5.2

    SPotY 1.34
    US Open 1.23
  • Options
    gealbhangealbhan Posts: 2,362

    gealbhan said:

    No lead for Labour in the crucial Oponiumyum. AND ONLY A TEENY DROP FOR THE CONSERVATIVES after the week they have had.
    LAB: 38%
    CON: 38% (-2)
    LDM: 8% (+1)
    GRN: 6% (=)
    SNP: 5% (-1)

    Arch Remainer Starmer can’t win back Red Brex. Labour in trouble at next election. They just weren’t ready for what the Tories were going to do this week to take the chance, Red Brex are back on the Tory Train now.

    Starmer’s blown it!

    You may be right, but please show your workings, otherwise it looks like you are just guessing.
    Already posted below by carlotta sense.

    I’ll dig them out for you now so the penny can drop for you.
  • Options
    turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 15,191
    ydoethur said:

    Pro_Rata said:

    That was brutal stuff.

    They've both turned up. What more can you ask for.

    You’d bloody hope they would at least turn up. Who do you think they are, the Indian cricket team?
    Oh they’ll turn up... at the IPL. Money grabbing shysters.
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,190
    I think Emma might win this second set comfortably.
  • Options
    Not over yet. Her opponent still has a lot to say.....
  • Options
    Can Raducanu go all the way from Qualifying without losing a single Set?
  • Options
    IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830

    After the first set:-
    Raducanu 1.23
    Fernandez 5.2

    F stonking value
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,232
    edited September 2021
    tlg86 said:

    I think Emma might win this second set comfortably.

    You just had to say that, didn’t you?

    Edit - although that was a lovely set up to win that game.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,926
    ydoethur said:

    dixiedean said:

    tlg86 said:

    Raducanu’s strength is that she pounces on anything slightly short and punishes it.

    Gosh I'm a pervert.
    Thoroughly ashamed I am.
    At least you’re not the poster burbling about her legs, @Pulpstar having beaten you to it!
    They are very long though !
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,745

    Muge Cevik
    @mugecevik
    ·
    1h
    It’s very irresponsible reporting the number of cases among vaccinated without mentioning the baseline vaccination rates. Your QTs are full of people, who think vaccines don’t work.
    Well done @itvnews

    Wait until they find out how many car crash fatalities were wearing seatbelts!
    I was going to say cycle accidents and helmets, but people do actually still debate that one apparently.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,232
    Pulpstar said:

    ydoethur said:

    dixiedean said:

    tlg86 said:

    Raducanu’s strength is that she pounces on anything slightly short and punishes it.

    Gosh I'm a pervert.
    Thoroughly ashamed I am.
    At least you’re not the poster burbling about her legs, @Pulpstar having beaten you to it!
    They are very long though !
    I would advise you to leave the obsessing about teenage girls’ legs to SeanT…
  • Options
    IshmaelZ said:

    After the first set:-
    Raducanu 1.23
    Fernandez 5.2

    F stonking value
    Fernandez out to 6. A surprisingly thin market though.
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,190
    ydoethur said:

    tlg86 said:

    I think Emma might win this second set comfortably.

    You just had to say that, didn’t you?

    Edit - although that was a lovely set up to win that game.
    Fernandez was hanging on for dear life in that first set. Mentally it takes a lot of a player.
  • Options
    carnforthcarnforth Posts: 3,207
    Just had another £20 at 7/1. Am I a gambling addict now?
  • Options
    MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 25,178
    tlg86 said:

    I think Emma might win this second set comfortably.

    Now you've said that I will put a wad on Fernandez.
  • Options
    gealbhangealbhan Posts: 2,362

    gealbhan said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    gealbhan said:

    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    So who will be watching Last Night of the Proms tonight? Someone's got to make sure all the old songs are still there while the rest of us watch the tennis. You'd think Channel 4 would have splashed it on their website but no.

    Let’s hope somebody is, choleric EU flag count by the Gammons has become a fine tradition.
    As is, equally, a hand wringing series of articles in the guardian saying ‘how can we let this jingoistic Rule Britannia nonsense go on’

    ......
    The guardian publishes this wank because their idiot readers lap it up. Every year. Without fail. I
    I haven't seen anything on it in the Guardian today. Could you direct me to it?
    It worries me that you’re a doctor. You’re not the brightest


    https://www.theguardian.com/music/2021/sep/10/rewrite-rule-britannia-what-would-you-do-with-the-last-night-of-the-proms?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
    Jersulem also stolen from the intention of the original prose, nor is it remotely as good or as patriotic as Parry’s blessed pair, thanks to fact Jerusalem not a real hymn, so we can swap that out for a change and have a far better prom.

    .
    Jerusalem is an exceptionally great poem.
    Jerusalem is remarkable for being claimed by both right and left -- as a paean to England and to socialism.
    “ paean … and to socialism. “

    Absolutely none of it is paean to Socialism. Which bit were you thinking of?
    Dark satanic mills ... building the new Jerusalem.
    the one reference to a mill dark and satanic is poetic reference to an actual mill gutted by fire standing between a poet’s home and his bread shop – possibly gutted in industrial dispute over pay. Blake believed in hell, to him this ruin looked like hell had visited it. This is what poets do.

    It’s not written as a hymn called Jerusalem - who said it was, it’s preamble to Milton.
    the reference to Jerusalem is Blake’s genuine belief Jesus and Joseph were building a bit of Jerusalem here. They were here, it may have been more than business, they may have been looking for a bolt hole if the sectarian war got much worse. As it proved, despite being on the leadership council, Joseph couldn’t stop them getting Jesus bumped off.

    As an historical person Jesus is certainly not wholly owned by Christianity. Not that his own religion cares to make much fuss of him. He was a Jew, called Yeshua, likely born into an extended family with Hellenised (Greek influenced) views, so possible but not certain he may have heard the Greek words Jesus and Christ in his lifetime. Why is Christianity so Greek? It was a language most widely used, so Romans utilised Greek to promote their empire, that was essentially a commercial project. The language of the Roman Empire was Greek. The first Christian documents, those of Paul, were written in Greek whilst in Greece. In the sectarian make up of Judea at the time of Yeshua’s birth there is likely to have been contention between Hellenised Jews, looking to adopt Greek Platonic philosophy along with the Torah, versus Orthodox Jews, such as the Pharisee, opposing this approach. So a child born not just into a family of wealth, religious and political leadership, but born moreover into sectarian disagreement.

    Before the time of his ministry there is something like a “gap year” about a decade and a half little evidence what young Yeshua was up to, other than he was associate of Joseph of Arimathea - this is someone who may have been Yeshua’s relative such as his Mother’s Uncle, for the considerate in loco parentis he showed Yoshua throughout remainder of his life and death we can call him Uncle. Uncle Joseph was a wealthy Rabbi, with trading links around the Mediterranean, Europe including Britain, also worked on building projects in pursuit of “the kingdom”. He may have been an Essenes - the sect who wrote the Dead Sea scrolls. It’s widely documented Joseph swapped the sunny skies of Judea for our clouded hills and pastures green at least once, he died at Glastonbury. And not simply in exile or mission, its possible for someone with his wealth and business links he owned the settlement and the surrounding lands.

    Blake enthusiastically researched the oral history’s of Britain, Europe and the Mediterranean looking for and finding correlating evidence for Yeshua’s visit to Britain.

    In the poets mind it was literal. You are projecting. And wrong.
  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,378
    edited September 2021

    IshmaelZ said:

    After the first set:-
    Raducanu 1.23
    Fernandez 5.2

    F stonking value
    Fernandez out to 6. A surprisingly thin market though.
    LOL I've just realised there are two markets and she is even longer on the match compared with the outright. Am I missing something because there really should not be any difference?
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,232
    edited September 2021
    tlg86 said:

    ydoethur said:

    tlg86 said:

    I think Emma might win this second set comfortably.

    You just had to say that, didn’t you?

    Edit - although that was a lovely set up to win that game.
    Fernandez was hanging on for dear life in that first set. Mentally it takes a lot of a player.
    So much so that she’s just fought back to deuce win the game from 0-40 down on serve again.

    She’s tough.
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,190
    That was some hold by Fernandez.
  • Options
    Pro_RataPro_Rata Posts: 4,811
    ydoethur said:

    tlg86 said:

    ydoethur said:

    tlg86 said:

    I think Emma might win this second set comfortably.

    You just had to say that, didn’t you?

    Edit - although that was a lovely set up to win that game.
    Fernandez was hanging on for dear life in that first set. Mentally it takes a lot of a player.
    So much so that she’s just fought back to deuce from 0-40 down on serve again.

    She’s tough.
    Fernandez lost opening sets to both Kerber and Osaka.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,232
    Pro_Rata said:

    ydoethur said:

    tlg86 said:

    ydoethur said:

    tlg86 said:

    I think Emma might win this second set comfortably.

    You just had to say that, didn’t you?

    Edit - although that was a lovely set up to win that game.
    Fernandez was hanging on for dear life in that first set. Mentally it takes a lot of a player.
    So much so that she’s just fought back to deuce from 0-40 down on serve again.

    She’s tough.
    Fernandez lost opening sets to both Kerber and Osaka.
    Didn’t she save match points in a couple of rounds as well?
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,232
    tlg86 said:

    That was some hold by Fernandez.

    I’m blaming you for this.
  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,378
    edited September 2021
    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    gealbhan said:

    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    So who will be watching Last Night of the Proms tonight? Someone's got to make sure all the old songs are still there while the rest of us watch the tennis. You'd think Channel 4 would have splashed it on their website but no.

    Let’s hope somebody is, choleric EU flag count by the Gammons has become a fine tradition.
    As is, equally, a hand wringing series of articles in the guardian saying ‘how can we let this jingoistic Rule Britannia nonsense go on’

    ......
    The guardian publishes this wank because their idiot readers lap it up. Every year. Without fail. I
    I haven't seen anything on it in the Guardian today. Could you direct me to it?
    It worries me that you’re a doctor. You’re not the brightest


    https://www.theguardian.com/music/2021/sep/10/rewrite-rule-britannia-what-would-you-do-with-the-last-night-of-the-proms?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
    Jersulem also stolen from the intention of the original prose, nor is it remotely as good or as patriotic as Parry’s blessed pair, thanks to fact Jerusalem not a real hymn, so we can swap that out for a change and have a far better prom.

    .
    Jerusalem is an exceptionally great poem.
    Jerusalem is remarkable for being claimed by both right and left -- as a paean to England and to socialism.
    “ paean … and to socialism. “

    Absolutely none of it is paean to Socialism. Which bit were you thinking of?
    Dark satanic mills ... building the new Jerusalem.
    the one reference to a mill dark and satanic is poetic reference to an actual mill gutted by fire standing between a poet’s home and his bread shop – possibly gutted in industrial dispute over pay. Blake believed in hell, to him this ruin looked like hell had visited it. This is what poets do.

    It’s not written as a hymn called Jerusalem - who said it was, it’s preamble to Milton.
    the reference to Jerusalem is Blake’s genuine belief Jesus and Joseph were building a bit of Jerusalem here. They were here, it may have been more than business, they may have been looking for a bolt hole if the sectarian war got much worse. As it proved, despite being on the leadership council, Joseph couldn’t stop them getting Jesus bumped off.

    As an historical person Jesus is certainly not wholly owned by Christianity. Not that his own religion cares to make much fuss of him. He was a Jew, called Yeshua, likely born into an extended family with Hellenised (Greek influenced) views, so possible but not certain he may have heard the Greek words Jesus and Christ in his lifetime. Why is Christianity so Greek? It was a language most widely used, so Romans utilised Greek to promote their empire, that was essentially a commercial project. The language of the Roman Empire was Greek. The first Christian documents, those of Paul, were written in Greek whilst in Greece. In the sectarian make up of Judea at the time of Yeshua’s birth there is likely to have been contention between Hellenised Jews, looking to adopt Greek Platonic philosophy along with the Torah, versus Orthodox Jews, such as the Pharisee, opposing this approach. So a child born not just into a family of wealth, religious and political leadership, but born moreover into sectarian disagreement.

    Before the time of his ministry there is something like a “gap year” about a decade and a half little evidence what young Yeshua was up to, other than he was associate of Joseph of Arimathea - this is someone who may have been Yeshua’s relative such as his Mother’s Uncle, for the considerate in loco parentis he showed Yoshua throughout remainder of his life and death we can call him Uncle. Uncle Joseph was a wealthy Rabbi, with trading links around the Mediterranean, Europe including Britain, also worked on building projects in pursuit of “the kingdom”. He may have been an Essenes - the sect who wrote the Dead Sea scrolls. It’s widely documented Joseph swapped the sunny skies of Judea for our clouded hills and pastures green at least once, he died at Glastonbury. And not simply in exile or mission, its possible for someone with his wealth and business links he owned the settlement and the surrounding lands.

    Blake enthusiastically researched the oral history’s of Britain, Europe and the Mediterranean looking for and finding correlating evidence for Yeshua’s visit to Britain.

    In the poets mind it was literal. You are projecting. And wrong.
    The Labour Party sings Jerusalem. As I said, it is claimed by both sides.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--dfp4b6akU
  • Options
    MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 25,178
    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    No lead for Labour in the crucial Oponiumyum. AND ONLY A TEENY DROP FOR THE CONSERVATIVES after the week they have had.
    LAB: 38%
    CON: 38% (-2)
    LDM: 8% (+1)
    GRN: 6% (=)
    SNP: 5% (-1)

    Arch Remainer Starmer can’t win back Red Brex. Labour in trouble at next election. They just weren’t ready for what the Tories were going to do this week to take the chance, Red Brex are back on the Tory Train now.

    Starmer’s blown it!

    You may be right, but please show your workings, otherwise it looks like you are just guessing.
    Already posted below by carlotta sense.

    I’ll dig them out for you now so the penny can drop for you.
    Very little of what Carlotta posts makes sense to me!

    For what it is worth I believe the Conservatives are odds on for an albeit reduced majority in 2024. However the polls have suggested over the last few days that a handful of their percentage point support is rather soft.

    My view has always been what happens to the post Brexit, post Covid economy. If it bombs Johnson is on his way to earning millions per night on the US after dinner circuit. If it booms he remains in Prime Ministerial penury.

    If the economy bombs Starmer being in Nippy's pocket will be less of an issue.
  • Options
    Reports PCR travel tests to be dropped for vaxxed:

    https://twitter.com/AllieHBNews/status/1436804678470316032?s=20
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,232
    What’s the penalty for @tlg86 ? Twelve months on ConHome?
  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,216
    edited September 2021
    kle4 said:

    Muge Cevik
    @mugecevik
    ·
    1h
    It’s very irresponsible reporting the number of cases among vaccinated without mentioning the baseline vaccination rates. Your QTs are full of people, who think vaccines don’t work.
    Well done @itvnews

    Wait until they find out how many car crash fatalities were wearing seatbelts!
    I was going to say cycle accidents and helmets, but people do actually still debate that one apparently.
    Peston's crap is still up on itv news website.

    Edit: And appears to be the most read story.

  • Options
    gealbhangealbhan Posts: 2,362
    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    No lead for Labour in the crucial Oponiumyum. AND ONLY A TEENY DROP FOR THE CONSERVATIVES after the week they have had.
    LAB: 38%
    CON: 38% (-2)
    LDM: 8% (+1)
    GRN: 6% (=)
    SNP: 5% (-1)

    Arch Remainer Starmer can’t win back Red Brex. Labour in trouble at next election. They just weren’t ready for what the Tories were going to do this week to take the chance, Red Brex are back on the Tory Train now.

    Starmer’s blown it!

    You may be right, but please show your workings, otherwise it looks like you are just guessing.
    Already posted below by carlotta sense.

    I’ll dig them out for you now so the penny can drop for you.
    This mid term is a disaster for Labour and Starmer, just not getting Red Brex back on board.

    Ignore the headlines, or any leads under about 15%, con to d/k is switchback

    Cons not switching to Lab in big numbers:

    What would 2019 Conservative voters do now?(Compared to 13th May, the peak of the Tory vaccine bounce)

    Stick with the Tories: 66% (-16)
    Switch to Labour: 5% (+2)
    Switch to other parties: 10% (+5)
    Undecided about how they would vote: 18% (+8)

    https://twitter.com/OpiniumResearch/status/1436766744056524800?s=20
  • Options
    Ouch! Could be a 3-setter!
  • Options

    Rachel Clarke
    @doctor_oxford
    ·
    11m
    This simply isn’t good enough,
    @itvnews
    . Inaccurate, high profile stories like this fuel vaccine hesitancy.

    You have no idea how utterly wretched it is to care for unvaccinated patients as they die from Covid - whose lives need not have been lost.
  • Options
    AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    Fernandez hit @12

    If you knew what you were doing in-play betting would be some easy money.
  • Options

    ITV News
    @itvnews
    Replying to
    @itvnews
    We’ve updated an earlier version of this article with a new headline.
  • Options
    Wow what a shot!
  • Options
    ydoethur said:

    What’s the penalty for @tlg86 ? Twelve months on ConHome?

    A shame parade.


  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,190
    ydoethur said:

    What’s the penalty for @tlg86 ? Twelve months on ConHome?

    Stop wetting yourself. She’s got this under control.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,232
    edited September 2021
    Thank you @tlg86 for keeping your mouth shut and letting matters improve.

    One thing that is notable is that serving isn’t the usual decisive advantage. It’s as though the other is returning in ways they don’t quite expect and they don’t know how to handle it.
  • Options
    Immediately broken back, 2-2
  • Options

    PMSL 😂😂😂
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,232
    tlg86 said:

    ydoethur said:

    What’s the penalty for @tlg86 ? Twelve months on ConHome?

    Stop wetting yourself. She’s got this under control.
    Spoke too soon…
  • Options
    MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 25,178
    ydoethur said:

    What’s the penalty for @tlg86 ? Twelve months on ConHome?

    That is Priti Patel level restorative justice!
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,926
    Can't see Fernández winning from here
  • Options
    She is a bit good, like.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,232

    ydoethur said:

    What’s the penalty for @tlg86 ? Twelve months on ConHome?

    That is Priti Patel level restorative justice!
    I thought about ‘explaining basic maths to Hyufd’ but I thought that would be a trifle unfair.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,232

    She is a bit good, like.

    Which she?
  • Options
    She is making it look easy.
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,629
    ydoethur said:

    dixiedean said:

    tlg86 said:

    Raducanu’s strength is that she pounces on anything slightly short and punishes it.

    Gosh I'm a pervert.
    Thoroughly ashamed I am.
    At least you’re not the poster burbling about her legs, @Pulpstar having beaten you to it!
    I quite like Fernandez's little dance with every serve.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,745
    edited September 2021
    Interesting that both players have had lots of break points, but taken far less of them compared to their average thus far in the tournament - that's battling tennis.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,232
    WHAT A WINNER TO BREAK!
  • Options
    4-2 second set
  • Options
    COME ON!
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,987
    edited September 2021

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    gealbhan said:

    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    So who will be watching Last Night of the Proms tonight? Someone's got to make sure all the old songs are still there while the rest of us watch the tennis. You'd think Channel 4 would have splashed it on their website but no.

    Let’s hope somebody is, choleric EU flag count by the Gammons has become a fine tradition.
    As is, equally, a hand wringing series of articles in the guardian saying ‘how can we let this jingoistic Rule Britannia nonsense go on’

    ......
    The guardian publishes this wank because their idiot readers lap it up. Every year. Without fail. I
    I haven't seen anything on it in the Guardian today. Could you direct me to it?
    It worries me that you’re a doctor. You’re not the brightest


    https://www.theguardian.com/music/2021/sep/10/rewrite-rule-britannia-what-would-you-do-with-the-last-night-of-the-proms?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
    Jersulem also stolen from the intention of the original prose, nor is it remotely as good or as patriotic as Parry’s blessed pair, thanks to fact Jerusalem not a real hymn, so we can swap that out for a change and have a far better prom.

    .
    Jerusalem is an exceptionally great poem.
    Jerusalem is remarkable for being claimed by both right and left -- as a paean to England and to socialism.
    “ paean … and to socialism. “

    Absolutely none of it is paean to Socialism. Which bit were you thinking of?
    Dark satanic mills ... building the new Jerusalem.
    the one reference to a mill dark and satanic is poetic reference to an actual mill gutted by fire standing between a poet’s home and his bread shop – possibly gutted in industrial dispute over pay. Blake believed in hell, to him this ruin looked like hell had visited it. This is what poets do.

    It’s not written as a hymn called Jerusalem - who said it was, it’s preamble to Milton.
    the reference to Jerusalem is Blake’s genuine belief Jesus and Joseph were building a bit of Jerusalem here. They were here, it may have been more than business, they may have been looking for a bolt hole if the sectarian war got much worse. As it proved, despite being on the leadership council, Joseph couldn’t stop them getting Jesus bumped off.

    As an historical person Jesus is certainly not wholly owned by Christianity. Not that his own religion cares to make much fuss of him. He was a Jew, called Yeshua, likely born into an extended family with Hellenised (Greek influenced) views, so possible but not certain he may have heard the Greek words Jesus and Christ in his lifetime. Why is Christianity so Greek? It was a language most widely used, so Romans utilised Greek to promote their empire, that was essentially a commercial project. The language of the Roman Empire was Greek. The first Christian documents, those of Paul, were written in Greek whilst in Greece. In the sectarian make up of Judea at the time of Yeshua’s birth there is likely to have been contention between Hellenised Jews, looking to adopt Greek Platonic philosophy along with the Torah, versus Orthodox Jews, such as the Pharisee, opposing this approach. So a child born not just into a family of wealth, religious and political leadership, but born moreover into sectarian disagreement.

    Before the time of his ministry there is something like a “gap year” about a decade and a half little evidence what young Yeshua was up to, other than he was associate of Joseph of Arimathea - this is someone who may have been Yeshua’s relative such as his Mother’s Uncle, for the considerate in loco parentis he showed Yoshua throughout remainder of his life and death we can call him Uncle. Uncle Joseph was a wealthy Rabbi, with trading links around the Mediterranean, Europe including Britain, also worked on building projects in pursuit of “the kingdom”. He may have been an Essenes - the sect who wrote the Dead Sea scrolls. It’s widely documented Joseph swapped the sunny skies of Judea for our clouded hills and pastures green at least once, he died at Glastonbury. And not simply in exile or mission, its possible for someone with his wealth and business links he owned the settlement and the surrounding lands.

    Blake enthusiastically researched the oral history’s of Britain, Europe and the Mediterranean looking for and finding correlating evidence for Yeshua’s visit to Britain.

    In the poets mind it was literal. You are projecting. And wrong.
    The Labour Party sings Jerusalem. As I said, it is claimed by both sides.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--dfp4b6akU
    For me, and bearing in mind I am really not a fan of socialism at all, I think it is ridiculous to claim that it belongs to one side or another. It is a poem/song about hope and striving for a better country. That belongs to all mainstream political parties - or should anyway. I love Jerusalem for its poignancy and it is a million times better as a song and a tune than, for example, Rule Britannia.
    Hear, hear: I am a fan of neither socialism, nor organized religion, but Jerusalem is a beautiful poem, and a very complex piece of music.

    And it doesn't belong to anyone.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,745
    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    What’s the penalty for @tlg86 ? Twelve months on ConHome?

    That is Priti Patel level restorative justice!
    I thought about ‘explaining basic maths to Hyufd’ but I thought that would be a trifle unfair.
    There has to be some possibility of redemption in the process.
  • Options
    Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 26,611
    I didn't know until now that Virginia Wade won the US Open in 1968, the last time a UK player was in the final.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,232
    rcs1000 said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    gealbhan said:

    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    So who will be watching Last Night of the Proms tonight? Someone's got to make sure all the old songs are still there while the rest of us watch the tennis. You'd think Channel 4 would have splashed it on their website but no.

    Let’s hope somebody is, choleric EU flag count by the Gammons has become a fine tradition.
    As is, equally, a hand wringing series of articles in the guardian saying ‘how can we let this jingoistic Rule Britannia nonsense go on’

    ......
    The guardian publishes this wank because their idiot readers lap it up. Every year. Without fail. I
    I haven't seen anything on it in the Guardian today. Could you direct me to it?
    It worries me that you’re a doctor. You’re not the brightest


    https://www.theguardian.com/music/2021/sep/10/rewrite-rule-britannia-what-would-you-do-with-the-last-night-of-the-proms?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
    Jersulem also stolen from the intention of the original prose, nor is it remotely as good or as patriotic as Parry’s blessed pair, thanks to fact Jerusalem not a real hymn, so we can swap that out for a change and have a far better prom.

    .
    Jerusalem is an exceptionally great poem.
    Jerusalem is remarkable for being claimed by both right and left -- as a paean to England and to socialism.
    “ paean … and to socialism. “

    Absolutely none of it is paean to Socialism. Which bit were you thinking of?
    Dark satanic mills ... building the new Jerusalem.
    the one reference to a mill dark and satanic is poetic reference to an actual mill gutted by fire standing between a poet’s home and his bread shop – possibly gutted in industrial dispute over pay. Blake believed in hell, to him this ruin looked like hell had visited it. This is what poets do.

    It’s not written as a hymn called Jerusalem - who said it was, it’s preamble to Milton.
    the reference to Jerusalem is Blake’s genuine belief Jesus and Joseph were building a bit of Jerusalem here. They were here, it may have been more than business, they may have been looking for a bolt hole if the sectarian war got much worse. As it proved, despite being on the leadership council, Joseph couldn’t stop them getting Jesus bumped off.

    As an historical person Jesus is certainly not wholly owned by Christianity. Not that his own religion cares to make much fuss of him. He was a Jew, called Yeshua, likely born into an extended family with Hellenised (Greek influenced) views, so possible but not certain he may have heard the Greek words Jesus and Christ in his lifetime. Why is Christianity so Greek? It was a language most widely used, so Romans utilised Greek to promote their empire, that was essentially a commercial project. The language of the Roman Empire was Greek. The first Christian documents, those of Paul, were written in Greek whilst in Greece. In the sectarian make up of Judea at the time of Yeshua’s birth there is likely to have been contention between Hellenised Jews, looking to adopt Greek Platonic philosophy along with the Torah, versus Orthodox Jews, such as the Pharisee, opposing this approach. So a child born not just into a family of wealth, religious and political leadership, but born moreover into sectarian disagreement.

    Before the time of his ministry there is something like a “gap year” about a decade and a half little evidence what young Yeshua was up to, other than he was associate of Joseph of Arimathea - this is someone who may have been Yeshua’s relative such as his Mother’s Uncle, for the considerate in loco parentis he showed Yoshua throughout remainder of his life and death we can call him Uncle. Uncle Joseph was a wealthy Rabbi, with trading links around the Mediterranean, Europe including Britain, also worked on building projects in pursuit of “the kingdom”. He may have been an Essenes - the sect who wrote the Dead Sea scrolls. It’s widely documented Joseph swapped the sunny skies of Judea for our clouded hills and pastures green at least once, he died at Glastonbury. And not simply in exile or mission, its possible for someone with his wealth and business links he owned the settlement and the surrounding lands.

    Blake enthusiastically researched the oral history’s of Britain, Europe and the Mediterranean looking for and finding correlating evidence for Yeshua’s visit to Britain.

    In the poets mind it was literal. You are projecting. And wrong.
    The Labour Party sings Jerusalem. As I said, it is claimed by both sides.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--dfp4b6akU
    For me, and bearing in mind I am really not a fan of socialism at all, I think it is ridiculous to claim that it belongs to one side or another. It is a poem/song about hope and striving for a better country. That belongs to all mainstream political parties - or should anyway. I love Jerusalem for its poignancy and it is a million times better as a song and a tune than, for example, Rule Britannia.
    Hear, hear: I am a fan of neither socialism, nor organized religion, but Jerusalem is a beautiful poem, and a very complex piece of music.
    It’s just too damn hard on my organ.
  • Options
    5-2 OMG!!
  • Options
    ydoethur said:

    She is a bit good, like.

    Which she?
    Well I'm not supporting the Canadian!
  • Options
    Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 26,611

    She is making it look easy.

    She certainly is.
  • Options
    Pulpstar said:

    Can't see Fernández winning from here

    30 on Betfair.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,232

    5-2 OMG!!

    Fernandez is capable of coming back. She’s done it before to some very fine players int his tournament.

    But - you have to say she is now up against it. It’s no chances tennis.
  • Options
    One game away. Come on Radacanu!

    She is phenomenal.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,745
    I never cause a spoiling, but IF it ends 6-4, 6-2/3 it will look easier than it was.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,232

    ydoethur said:

    She is a bit good, like.

    Which she?
    Well I'm not supporting the Canadian!
    That doesn’t narrow it down :smile:
  • Options

    Pulpstar said:

    Can't see Fernández winning from here

    30 on Betfair.
    That's probably fair at 5-2 and a set down.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,745
    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    She is a bit good, like.

    Which she?
    Well I'm not supporting the Canadian!
    That doesn’t narrow it down :smile:
    I do like her twitter bio, which just says

    london|toronto|shenyang|bucharest
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,232
    Do they check the ball for snow after that point?
  • Options
    MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 25,178
    ydoethur said:

    rcs1000 said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    gealbhan said:

    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    So who will be watching Last Night of the Proms tonight? Someone's got to make sure all the old songs are still there while the rest of us watch the tennis. You'd think Channel 4 would have splashed it on their website but no.

    Let’s hope somebody is, choleric EU flag count by the Gammons has become a fine tradition.
    As is, equally, a hand wringing series of articles in the guardian saying ‘how can we let this jingoistic Rule Britannia nonsense go on’

    ......
    The guardian publishes this wank because their idiot readers lap it up. Every year. Without fail. I
    I haven't seen anything on it in the Guardian today. Could you direct me to it?
    It worries me that you’re a doctor. You’re not the brightest


    https://www.theguardian.com/music/2021/sep/10/rewrite-rule-britannia-what-would-you-do-with-the-last-night-of-the-proms?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
    Jersulem also stolen from the intention of the original prose, nor is it remotely as good or as patriotic as Parry’s blessed pair, thanks to fact Jerusalem not a real hymn, so we can swap that out for a change and have a far better prom.

    .
    Jerusalem is an exceptionally great poem.
    Jerusalem is remarkable for being claimed by both right and left -- as a paean to England and to socialism.
    “ paean … and to socialism. “

    Absolutely none of it is paean to Socialism. Which bit were you thinking of?
    Dark satanic mills ... building the new Jerusalem.
    the one reference to a mill dark and satanic is poetic reference to an actual mill gutted by fire standing between a poet’s home and his bread shop – possibly gutted in industrial dispute over pay. Blake believed in hell, to him this ruin looked like hell had visited it. This is what poets do.

    It’s not written as a hymn called Jerusalem - who said it was, it’s preamble to Milton.
    the reference to Jerusalem is Blake’s genuine belief Jesus and Joseph were building a bit of Jerusalem here. They were here, it may have been more than business, they may have been looking for a bolt hole if the sectarian war got much worse. As it proved, despite being on the leadership council, Joseph couldn’t stop them getting Jesus bumped off.

    As an historical person Jesus is certainly not wholly owned by Christianity. Not that his own religion cares to make much fuss of him. He was a Jew, called Yeshua, likely born into an extended family with Hellenised (Greek influenced) views, so possible but not certain he may have heard the Greek words Jesus and Christ in his lifetime. Why is Christianity so Greek? It was a language most widely used, so Romans utilised Greek to promote their empire, that was essentially a commercial project. The language of the Roman Empire was Greek. The first Christian documents, those of Paul, were written in Greek whilst in Greece. In the sectarian make up of Judea at the time of Yeshua’s birth there is likely to have been contention between Hellenised Jews, looking to adopt Greek Platonic philosophy along with the Torah, versus Orthodox Jews, such as the Pharisee, opposing this approach. So a child born not just into a family of wealth, religious and political leadership, but born moreover into sectarian disagreement.

    Before the time of his ministry there is something like a “gap year” about a decade and a half little evidence what young Yeshua was up to, other than he was associate of Joseph of Arimathea - this is someone who may have been Yeshua’s relative such as his Mother’s Uncle, for the considerate in loco parentis he showed Yoshua throughout remainder of his life and death we can call him Uncle. Uncle Joseph was a wealthy Rabbi, with trading links around the Mediterranean, Europe including Britain, also worked on building projects in pursuit of “the kingdom”. He may have been an Essenes - the sect who wrote the Dead Sea scrolls. It’s widely documented Joseph swapped the sunny skies of Judea for our clouded hills and pastures green at least once, he died at Glastonbury. And not simply in exile or mission, its possible for someone with his wealth and business links he owned the settlement and the surrounding lands.

    Blake enthusiastically researched the oral history’s of Britain, Europe and the Mediterranean looking for and finding correlating evidence for Yeshua’s visit to Britain.

    In the poets mind it was literal. You are projecting. And wrong.
    The Labour Party sings Jerusalem. As I said, it is claimed by both sides.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--dfp4b6akU
    For me, and bearing in mind I am really not a fan of socialism at all, I think it is ridiculous to claim that it belongs to one side or another. It is a poem/song about hope and striving for a better country. That belongs to all mainstream political parties - or should anyway. I love Jerusalem for its poignancy and it is a million times better as a song and a tune than, for example, Rule Britannia.
    Hear, hear: I am a fan of neither socialism, nor organized religion, but Jerusalem is a beautiful poem, and a very complex piece of music.
    It’s just too damn hard on my organ.
    Are you channelling TSE now ? Ooh arr Mrs!
  • Options
    Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 26,611
    Match point.
This discussion has been closed.