Options
politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » And so MPs move on to vote against leaving the EU with no deal

So after last night’s excitement today’s focus is a new Commons vote at 7pm on ruling out the UK leaving the EU with no deal. Then we’ll get tomorrow’s Article 50 extension move.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
If MPs vote down the possibility of a no-deal Brexit on Wednesday night, they will vote on Thursday on whether to seek an extension to article 50. Efforts are under way to persuade Theresa May to announce plans then to hold debates on Brexit options the following week in order to determine a new path for parliament during a short extension.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/mar/13/group-of-mps-plan-to-force-indicative-votes-on-brexit-options
(Thank you kindly, by the way...
That puts the whole question of Brexit (being trashed in the Commons with almost every speech) back on the table.
https://edition.cnn.com/world/live-news/boeing-737-max-8-ethiopia-airlines-crash/h_90b712a98f5346d3ffddcbb61990aa40
Not before bloody time...
Those who want a vote to prevent no deal is more reasonable.
And the accepted terminology now is ERG Remainers. People who fight against Brexit that hard deserve the label.
turns off BBC Parliament
The new terminology is a bit like the Sinn Fein/IRA tag that unionists in Northern Ireland use!
Yes they would not get that through the House. But that even most of those most damning about Brexit won't even try to do that just makes me think that implicitly they don't Brexit is as bad as they say.
What I don't get is why they weren't grounded after the LionAir crash. It should have been obvious even to somebody as thick as a Boeing executive that something was out of place then. And if that had happened these people in Ethiopia wouldn't have died.
Pennycook (a boy trying to do a man's job) followed Baron.
And Corbyn would if he ever got into power.
I have a theory that it's probably something to do with penis length, or lack thereof.
Buggering about some more, I'm guessing, will not pass the EU's reasoned justification test.
If you think the Withdrawal Agreement is so bad that you cannot vote for it, you have no business putting it to the public.
That, he argues, "desensitised many people in this country to the risks involved".
I certainly hope no one else ever endlessly repeats nonsensical mantras, like 'For the many not the few'.
Mind you that could equally be No Deal, 6 months of increasing pain, a new Tory Leader and a General election with Corbyn winning 400 seats.
This completely contradicts what the EU were saying publicly yesterday.
This is the moment Brexit dies.
https://twitter.com/heidiallen75/status/1105902971030786050
It implies there was a time the disagraced national security risk had 'it.'
And just in time to get "No Deal" off the table!
Edit/division
His arguments about desensitising the country can't really apply to the slogans because they aren't really policy positions.