politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Marine le Pen might be 26% behind in the polls but she’s attra
Comments
-
So Labour is going to be defeated by the senile and infirm?!!surbiton said:In the Opinium tables, VI all 10, if we add up the numbers voting 18-34, 35-44, 45-54,
we get, C 259, Lab 269.
However, Labour are massacred thereafter. 55+ C 315, Lab 99.
The subsets are hilarious. Wales Con 29, Lab 14, PC 4. In fact, Con 29 out of 62.
At this rate, they will win every seat in Wales!0 -
It will also be interesting to see how many Greens stand.ThreeQuidder said:
They might manage that if they stand in all constituencies. But they won't...Pulpstar said:
Lol UKIP on 8%RobD said:New ORB poll from the Telegraph?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/06/tories-course-gain-biggest-landslide-election-victory-seen-fifty/
CON 46 (+4), LAB 31 (nc), LD9 (-1), UKIP 8 (nc)!?!
When do nominations close? Thursday?0 -
That's a good point. Worth remembering some UKIP voters will be going home back to Labour.Pulpstar said:Labour might hit 29%. (Which opinion polls would have as 30%)
Think about it - UKIP will collapse to around 3% I think since they won't run candidates.
Lib Dems will add around half the vote share back to end up ~ 12%.
The Greens might be eaten into a bit by Labour, perhaps end up with ~ 2%.
UKIP + LD + Green + Tory + Labour must come to 92% or so I think.
3+12+2+29 which would mean 46% for the Tories. (Equiv to a polling score of ~47)
So 2-3-12-29-46 could be the final result.
That'd mean a 17 pt lead but the Labour vote would be holding up where it needs to least - particularly in terms of stemming the Tory tide.0 -
There's an epidemic of the senile and infirm at just past age 54?! Why isn't that bigger news?justin124 said:
So Labour is going to be defeated by the senile and infirm?!!surbiton said:In the Opinium tables, VI all 10, if we add up the numbers voting 18-34, 35-44, 45-54,
we get, C 259, Lab 269.
However, Labour are massacred thereafter. 55+ C 315, Lab 99.
The subsets are hilarious. Wales Con 29, Lab 14, PC 4. In fact, Con 29 out of 62.
At this rate, they will win every seat in Wales!0 -
I predicted 44/27 Tory/labour earlier so can well see this been how it pans out. I don't see how Labour can reach 30%.Pulpstar said:Labour might hit 29%. (Which opinion polls would have as 30%)
Think about it - UKIP will collapse to around 3% I think since they won't run candidates.
Lib Dems will add around half the vote share back to end up ~ 12%.
The Greens might be eaten into a bit by Labour, perhaps end up with ~ 2%.
UKIP + LD + Green + Tory + Labour must come to 92% or so I think.
3+12+2+29 which would mean 46% for the Tories. (Equiv to a polling score of ~47)
So 2-3-12-29-46 could be the final result.
That'd mean a 17 pt lead but the Labour vote would be holding up where it needs to least - particularly in terms of stemming the Tory tide.0 -
Labour will do worse than the (roughly) 30% these polls are showing for Lab.justin124 said:The two polls out tonight are implying a swing of about 4.5% from Lab to Con. Applied universally that would give Labour circa 195 seats - though they might just hit 200 by picking up a few from the SNP.
0 -
You think 55 year olds are senile and infirm?justin124 said:
So Labour is going to be defeated by the senile and infirm?!!surbiton said:In the Opinium tables, VI all 10, if we add up the numbers voting 18-34, 35-44, 45-54,
we get, C 259, Lab 269.
However, Labour are massacred thereafter. 55+ C 315, Lab 99.
The subsets are hilarious. Wales Con 29, Lab 14, PC 4. In fact, Con 29 out of 62.
At this rate, they will win every seat in Wales!
You're one sad, strange little man.0 -
https://twitter.com/guardiannews/status/860736452367269888
Interesting vox pops from Macron territory.0 -
No, it's just the half life for brainwashing by the right wing media is ~55 years.Philip_Thompson said:
You think 55 year olds are senile and infirm?justin124 said:
So Labour is going to be defeated by the senile and infirm?!!surbiton said:In the Opinium tables, VI all 10, if we add up the numbers voting 18-34, 35-44, 45-54,
we get, C 259, Lab 269.
However, Labour are massacred thereafter. 55+ C 315, Lab 99.
The subsets are hilarious. Wales Con 29, Lab 14, PC 4. In fact, Con 29 out of 62.
At this rate, they will win every seat in Wales!
You're one sad, strange little man.0 -
Only a flu epidemic starting 6th June can minimise Labour's defeat.kle4 said:
There's an epidemic of the senile and infirm at just past age 54?! Why isn't that bigger news?justin124 said:
So Labour is going to be defeated by the senile and infirm?!!surbiton said:In the Opinium tables, VI all 10, if we add up the numbers voting 18-34, 35-44, 45-54,
we get, C 259, Lab 269.
However, Labour are massacred thereafter. 55+ C 315, Lab 99.
The subsets are hilarious. Wales Con 29, Lab 14, PC 4. In fact, Con 29 out of 62.
At this rate, they will win every seat in Wales!0 -
Students, university workers, Bobos think Corbyn is wonderful. Add Black and Muslim voters, people who maintain tribal loyalty to Labour, extreme left wingers, public sector unions, and 30% is quite feasible.kyf_100 said:
What if we're wrong and Corbyn really is picking up votes from the disenfranchised and disillusioned?SquareRoot said:
Labour are overstated. Does anyone really believe one in three will vote for Corbyn's party, with henchmen like McDonnell and Milne. I don'tRobD said:New ORB poll from the Telegraph?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/06/tories-course-gain-biggest-landslide-election-victory-seen-fifty/
CON 46 (+4), LAB 31 (nc), LD9 (-1), UKIP 8 (nc)
What if against all wisdom, there is a hardcore of people - old lefties set in their ways and young anti-capitalist types - who are boosting Corbyn's share of the vote? Add that to Labour's client vote of public sector types and is 31% impossible?
We're seeing these figures again and again and again.
It won't help him in the marginals, but it could explain the national share of vote holding up.
I can't believe it, but we'd be fools to discount the possibility entirely.0 -
55 year olds were 21 the last time Labour went batshit crazy left wing...Philip_Thompson said:
You think 55 year olds are senile and infirm?justin124 said:
So Labour is going to be defeated by the senile and infirm?!!surbiton said:In the Opinium tables, VI all 10, if we add up the numbers voting 18-34, 35-44, 45-54,
we get, C 259, Lab 269.
However, Labour are massacred thereafter. 55+ C 315, Lab 99.
The subsets are hilarious. Wales Con 29, Lab 14, PC 4. In fact, Con 29 out of 62.
At this rate, they will win every seat in Wales!
You're one sad, strange little man.0 -
Especially with a CPS bombshell. I think the earliest possible announcement would be May 8th (Mon), if the MP under question submitted their expenses the day after the election (TSE, correct me if I am wrong)Sean_F said:
Students, university workers, Bobos think Corbyn is wonderful. Add Black and Muslim voters, people who maintain tribal loyalty to Labour, extreme left wingers, public sector unions, and 30% is quite feasible.kyf_100 said:
What if we're wrong and Corbyn really is picking up votes from the disenfranchised and disillusioned?SquareRoot said:
Labour are overstated. Does anyone really believe one in three will vote for Corbyn's party, with henchmen like McDonnell and Milne. I don'tRobD said:New ORB poll from the Telegraph?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/06/tories-course-gain-biggest-landslide-election-victory-seen-fifty/
CON 46 (+4), LAB 31 (nc), LD9 (-1), UKIP 8 (nc)
What if against all wisdom, there is a hardcore of people - old lefties set in their ways and young anti-capitalist types - who are boosting Corbyn's share of the vote? Add that to Labour's client vote of public sector types and is 31% impossible?
We're seeing these figures again and again and again.
It won't help him in the marginals, but it could explain the national share of vote holding up.
I can't believe it, but we'd be fools to discount the possibility entirely.0 -
That's not a very nice way to describe Corbyn, Abbott and Macdonnell.justin124 said:
So Labour is going to be defeated by the senile and infirm?!!surbiton said:In the Opinium tables, VI all 10, if we add up the numbers voting 18-34, 35-44, 45-54,
we get, C 259, Lab 269.
However, Labour are massacred thereafter. 55+ C 315, Lab 99.
The subsets are hilarious. Wales Con 29, Lab 14, PC 4. In fact, Con 29 out of 62.
At this rate, they will win every seat in Wales!
Truthful though.0 -
How did Trump win in the rust belt ? About 5% who never or rarely voted came out for him.kyf_100 said:
What if we're wrong and Corbyn really is picking up votes from the disenfranchised and disillusioned?SquareRoot said:
Labour are overstated. Does anyone really believe one in three will vote for Corbyn's party, with henchmen like McDonnell and Milne. I don'tRobD said:New ORB poll from the Telegraph?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/06/tories-course-gain-biggest-landslide-election-victory-seen-fifty/
CON 46 (+4), LAB 31 (nc), LD9 (-1), UKIP 8 (nc)
What if against all wisdom, there is a hardcore of people - old lefties set in their ways and young anti-capitalist types - who are boosting Corbyn's share of the vote? Add that to Labour's client vote of public sector types and is 31% impossible?
We're seeing these figures again and again and again.
It won't help him in the marginals, but it could explain the national share of vote holding up.
I can't believe it, but we'd be fools to discount the possibility entirely.
In the UK, 30% don't vote [ I am talking about those on the electoral rolls ]. Corbyn appeals to some people. Can 5% of those come and vote. It won't solve Labour's problem but could cut the deficit.0 -
Is there going to be an election prediction competition this time? FWIW, for the GB vote, I'll go for something like:
Tories 45.6%
Labour 24.7%
LDs 11.8%
UKIP 6.9%
Greens 5.4%
SNP 5.0%
Others the balance0 -
Plenty of the Labour voters that I know are neither pro or anti Jezza, to them it is just court politics if they are aware of it at all. Fair numbers were Leavers too, mostly with the old school left wing leaver mentality that sees the EU as a capitalists club.Sean_F said:
Students, university workers, Bobos think Corbyn is wonderful. Add Black and Muslim voters, people who maintain tribal loyalty to Labour, extreme left wingers, public sector unions, and 30% is quite feasible.kyf_100 said:
What if we're wrong and Corbyn really is picking up votes from the disenfranchised and disillusioned?SquareRoot said:
Labour are overstated. Does anyone really believe one in three will vote for Corbyn's party, with henchmen like McDonnell and Milne. I don'tRobD said:New ORB poll from the Telegraph?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/06/tories-course-gain-biggest-landslide-election-victory-seen-fifty/
CON 46 (+4), LAB 31 (nc), LD9 (-1), UKIP 8 (nc)
What if against all wisdom, there is a hardcore of people - old lefties set in their ways and young anti-capitalist types - who are boosting Corbyn's share of the vote? Add that to Labour's client vote of public sector types and is 31% impossible?
We're seeing these figures again and again and again.
It won't help him in the marginals, but it could explain the national share of vote holding up.
I can't believe it, but we'd be fools to discount the possibility entirely.
0 -
Always classyjustin124 said:
So Labour is going to be defeated by the senile and infirm?!!surbiton said:In the Opinium tables, VI all 10, if we add up the numbers voting 18-34, 35-44, 45-54,
we get, C 259, Lab 269.
However, Labour are massacred thereafter. 55+ C 315, Lab 99.
The subsets are hilarious. Wales Con 29, Lab 14, PC 4. In fact, Con 29 out of 62.
At this rate, they will win every seat in Wales!
Is that what it means to be progressive?
0 -
What about all those early postal votes?surbiton said:
Only a flu epidemic starting 6th June can minimise Labour's defeat.kle4 said:
There's an epidemic of the senile and infirm at just past age 54?! Why isn't that bigger news?justin124 said:
So Labour is going to be defeated by the senile and infirm?!!surbiton said:In the Opinium tables, VI all 10, if we add up the numbers voting 18-34, 35-44, 45-54,
we get, C 259, Lab 269.
However, Labour are massacred thereafter. 55+ C 315, Lab 99.
The subsets are hilarious. Wales Con 29, Lab 14, PC 4. In fact, Con 29 out of 62.
At this rate, they will win every seat in Wales!0 -
I'm not going to predict vote shares per se, but I will make two predictions about the GE.
1) The Labour VI will be lower than 2015
2) The Tories will outperform UNS/Labour will under perform it.0 -
Been out. Le Pen's price has gone for a walk. Now 15 on Betfair.
I miss something?0 -
Isn't that the earliest possible deadline? An announcement can happen any day before and including the deadline.RobD said:
Especially with a CPS bombshell. I think the earliest possible announcement would be May 8th (Mon), if the MP under question submitted their expenses the day after the election (TSE, correct me if I am wrong)Sean_F said:
Students, university workers, Bobos think Corbyn is wonderful. Add Black and Muslim voters, people who maintain tribal loyalty to Labour, extreme left wingers, public sector unions, and 30% is quite feasible.kyf_100 said:
What if we're wrong and Corbyn really is picking up votes from the disenfranchised and disillusioned?SquareRoot said:
Labour are overstated. Does anyone really believe one in three will vote for Corbyn's party, with henchmen like McDonnell and Milne. I don'tRobD said:New ORB poll from the Telegraph?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/06/tories-course-gain-biggest-landslide-election-victory-seen-fifty/
CON 46 (+4), LAB 31 (nc), LD9 (-1), UKIP 8 (nc)
What if against all wisdom, there is a hardcore of people - old lefties set in their ways and young anti-capitalist types - who are boosting Corbyn's share of the vote? Add that to Labour's client vote of public sector types and is 31% impossible?
We're seeing these figures again and again and again.
It won't help him in the marginals, but it could explain the national share of vote holding up.
I can't believe it, but we'd be fools to discount the possibility entirely.0 -
I can feel another polling disaster inquiry coming on...0
-
There's a lot can happen in a month. I imagine someone somewhere is trying to hack into all the political parties as I write this (it's not me though!). And who knows what Wikileaks have....RobD said:
Especially with a CPS bombshell. I think the earliest possible announcement would be May 8th (Mon), if the MP under question submitted their expenses the day after the election (TSE, correct me if I am wrong)Sean_F said:
Students, university workers, Bobos think Corbyn is wonderful. Add Black and Muslim voters, people who maintain tribal loyalty to Labour, extreme left wingers, public sector unions, and 30% is quite feasible.kyf_100 said:
What if we're wrong and Corbyn really is picking up votes from the disenfranchised and disillusioned?SquareRoot said:
Labour are overstated. Does anyone really believe one in three will vote for Corbyn's party, with henchmen like McDonnell and Milne. I don'tRobD said:New ORB poll from the Telegraph?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/06/tories-course-gain-biggest-landslide-election-victory-seen-fifty/
CON 46 (+4), LAB 31 (nc), LD9 (-1), UKIP 8 (nc)
What if against all wisdom, there is a hardcore of people - old lefties set in their ways and young anti-capitalist types - who are boosting Corbyn's share of the vote? Add that to Labour's client vote of public sector types and is 31% impossible?
We're seeing these figures again and again and again.
It won't help him in the marginals, but it could explain the national share of vote holding up.
I can't believe it, but we'd be fools to discount the possibility entirely.0 -
I saw that in the TelegraphFrancisUrquhart said:Bonkers...made comments 2 years ago, now the plod investigating.
Stephen Fry faces blasphemy probe after God comments
Officers are understood to be examining whether the British comedian committed a criminal offence under the Defamation Act when he appeared on RTE in 2015.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-39830447
Seriously, if people want to criticise religion let them.0 -
Yes, I should have worded it like that. Unfortunately, we don't know when the various submissions occurred. I assume the CPS will announce no charges, so we should expect to hear something in the next couple of weeks.Philip_Thompson said:
Isn't that the earliest possible deadline? An announcement can happen any day before and including the deadline.RobD said:
Especially with a CPS bombshell. I think the earliest possible announcement would be May 8th (Mon), if the MP under question submitted their expenses the day after the election (TSE, correct me if I am wrong)Sean_F said:
Students, university workers, Bobos think Corbyn is wonderful. Add Black and Muslim voters, people who maintain tribal loyalty to Labour, extreme left wingers, public sector unions, and 30% is quite feasible.kyf_100 said:
What if we're wrong and Corbyn really is picking up votes from the disenfranchised and disillusioned?SquareRoot said:
Labour are overstated. Does anyone really believe one in three will vote for Corbyn's party, with henchmen like McDonnell and Milne. I don'tRobD said:New ORB poll from the Telegraph?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/06/tories-course-gain-biggest-landslide-election-victory-seen-fifty/
CON 46 (+4), LAB 31 (nc), LD9 (-1), UKIP 8 (nc)
What if against all wisdom, there is a hardcore of people - old lefties set in their ways and young anti-capitalist types - who are boosting Corbyn's share of the vote? Add that to Labour's client vote of public sector types and is 31% impossible?
We're seeing these figures again and again and again.
It won't help him in the marginals, but it could explain the national share of vote holding up.
I can't believe it, but we'd be fools to discount the possibility entirely.0 -
It does say there has not been a case brought since the law was brought, and it is unlikely this one will be, which just makes clear how pointless the law is even if it were ok, which it isn't. One wonders how much time the police have to spend looking into complaints before deciding its not in the public interest to proceed.Floater said:
I saw that in the TelegraphFrancisUrquhart said:Bonkers...made comments 2 years ago, now the plod investigating.
Stephen Fry faces blasphemy probe after God comments
Officers are understood to be examining whether the British comedian committed a criminal offence under the Defamation Act when he appeared on RTE in 2015.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-39830447
Seriously, if people want to criticise religion let them.0 -
Following my usual practice, please note that today I have placed a bet with BetFred.
* Date: 2017-05-06
* Market: 2017 French Presidential.
* Winner: Emmanuel Macron
* Stake: £100
* Odds: 1/10
Of course, if the Putin hack sways the election in LePen's favor I shall appear very silly. But you go to war with the army you have.0 -
UKIP managed to lose more councillors in England than Labour
Britain Elects @britainelects 22h22 hours ago
English results:
Con: 1,457 (+338)
Lab: 411 (-147)
LDem: 306 (-32)
Grn: 20 (-)
UKIP: 1 (-148)
Ind / Oth: 198 (-6)
0 -
I hope they charge him and it goes to court. Not because I think he should be punished - far from it, I hold blasphemy laws in contempt and cannot believe that such a law is compatible with the ECHR - but because listening to Fry take on whichever poor sod got the task of prosecuting him would be pure comedy gold.Floater said:
I saw that in the TelegraphFrancisUrquhart said:Bonkers...made comments 2 years ago, now the plod investigating.
Stephen Fry faces blasphemy probe after God comments
Officers are understood to be examining whether the British comedian committed a criminal offence under the Defamation Act when he appeared on RTE in 2015.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-39830447
Seriously, if people want to criticise religion let them.0 -
Final numbers on the BBC were Lab-142, UKIP -143. Although they report a lower number of Tory councillors (1439), so maybe they aren't final?logical_song said:UKIP managed to lose more councillors in England than Labour
Britain Elects @britainelects 22h22 hours ago
English results:
Con: 1,457 (+338)
Lab: 411 (-147)
LDem: 306 (-32)
Grn: 20 (-)
UKIP: 1 (-148)
Ind / Oth: 198 (-6)0 -
For a Corbyn led Labour party the "far-right" UKIP losing almost 150 Council seats is seen as a win. It's actually a bigger goal for them then *actually* winning I would guess.frpenkridge said:Labour did win the local elections. I saw on facebook that they are cock-a-hoop over their dramatic wins in Margate and Ramsgate.
0 -
Long enough to meet Stephen Fry, get to shake his hand and get him to autograph something.kle4 said:
It does say there has not been a case brought since the law was brought, and it is unlikely this one will be, which just makes clear how pointless the law is even if it were ok, which it isn't. One wonders how much time the police have to spend looking into complaints before deciding its not in the public interest to proceed.Floater said:
I saw that in the TelegraphFrancisUrquhart said:Bonkers...made comments 2 years ago, now the plod investigating.
Stephen Fry faces blasphemy probe after God comments
Officers are understood to be examining whether the British comedian committed a criminal offence under the Defamation Act when he appeared on RTE in 2015.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-39830447
Seriously, if people want to criticise religion let them.
Bugger! Showing my age. Forget to add 'and get a selfie with him'.0 -
51% : Tory support in Scotland? Or Wales Or Midlands? Or North? Or London
51% : Those in favour of remain exc D/K
51% : Average margin of error of opinion polls in the UK
51% : Percentage of UKIP voters switched to Tories
51% : percentage of Labour supporters certain to vote
51% : May's net popularity
51% : Percentage of Labour supporters who think Corbyn should resign.
0 -
Bobo?Sean_F said:
Students, university workers, Bobos think Corbyn is wonderful. Add Black and Muslim voters, people who maintain tribal loyalty to Labour, extreme left wingers, public sector unions, and 30% is quite feasible.kyf_100 said:
What if we're wrong and Corbyn really is picking up votes from the disenfranchised and disillusioned?SquareRoot said:
Labour are overstated. Does anyone really believe one in three will vote for Corbyn's party, with henchmen like McDonnell and Milne. I don'tRobD said:New ORB poll from the Telegraph?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/06/tories-course-gain-biggest-landslide-election-victory-seen-fifty/
CON 46 (+4), LAB 31 (nc), LD9 (-1), UKIP 8 (nc)
What if against all wisdom, there is a hardcore of people - old lefties set in their ways and young anti-capitalist types - who are boosting Corbyn's share of the vote? Add that to Labour's client vote of public sector types and is 31% impossible?
We're seeing these figures again and again and again.
It won't help him in the marginals, but it could explain the national share of vote holding up.
I can't believe it, but we'd be fools to discount the possibility entirely.0 -
Yes, exactly. This was the promised land of disaffected non-voters the Corbynites claimed he would lead them to all along.surbiton said:
How did Trump win in the rust belt ? About 5% who never or rarely voted came out for him.kyf_100 said:
What if we're wrong and Corbyn really is picking up votes from the disenfranchised and disillusioned?SquareRoot said:
Labour are overstated. Does anyone really believe one in three will vote for Corbyn's party, with henchmen like McDonnell and Milne. I don'tRobD said:New ORB poll from the Telegraph?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/06/tories-course-gain-biggest-landslide-election-victory-seen-fifty/
CON 46 (+4), LAB 31 (nc), LD9 (-1), UKIP 8 (nc)
What if against all wisdom, there is a hardcore of people - old lefties set in their ways and young anti-capitalist types - who are boosting Corbyn's share of the vote? Add that to Labour's client vote of public sector types and is 31% impossible?
We're seeing these figures again and again and again.
It won't help him in the marginals, but it could explain the national share of vote holding up.
I can't believe it, but we'd be fools to discount the possibility entirely.
In the UK, 30% don't vote [ I am talking about those on the electoral rolls ]. Corbyn appeals to some people. Can 5% of those come and vote. It won't solve Labour's problem but could cut the deficit.
I think it will help Labour pile up votes in seats that are already absolutely safe, but I can't discount the possibility that it will help bring people out in 'rust belt' areas where we are currently assuming the Con + UKIP vote from 2015 going mostly to the Conservatives this time would otherwise wipe Labour out.
Even if it does only help Labour pile up votes in safe seats, getting somewhere close to 30% share of the vote will be all the mandate Corbyn needs to carry on...0 -
Maybe. Particularly UKIP if they don't have so many candidates. I just have a feeling that the protest vote could be surprisingly high this time, given Labour's state.IanB2 said:
UKIP and Green look a tad high?MTimT said:Is there going to be an election prediction competition this time? FWIW, for the GB vote, I'll go for something like:
Tories 45.6%
Labour 24.7%
LDs 11.8%
UKIP 6.9%
Greens 5.4%
SNP 5.0%
Others the balance0 -
Beofre I clicked on it I thought it was a going to be in a Muslim country, not Ireland. LOL. Suprising.MTimT said:
I hope they charge him and it goes to court. Not because I think he should be punished - far from it, I hold blasphemy laws in contempt and cannot believe that such a law is compatible with the ECHR - but because listening to Fry take on whichever poor sod got the task of prosecuting him would be pure comedy gold.Floater said:
I saw that in the TelegraphFrancisUrquhart said:Bonkers...made comments 2 years ago, now the plod investigating.
Stephen Fry faces blasphemy probe after God comments
Officers are understood to be examining whether the British comedian committed a criminal offence under the Defamation Act when he appeared on RTE in 2015.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-39830447
Seriously, if people want to criticise religion let them.0 -
Bohemian and bourgeois, no?matt said:
Bobo?Sean_F said:
Students, university workers, Bobos think Corbyn is wonderful. Add Black and Muslim voters, people who maintain tribal loyalty to Labour, extreme left wingers, public sector unions, and 30% is quite feasible.kyf_100 said:
What if we're wrong and Corbyn really is picking up votes from the disenfranchised and disillusioned?SquareRoot said:
Labour are overstated. Does anyone really believe one in three will vote for Corbyn's party, with henchmen like McDonnell and Milne. I don'tRobD said:New ORB poll from the Telegraph?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/06/tories-course-gain-biggest-landslide-election-victory-seen-fifty/
CON 46 (+4), LAB 31 (nc), LD9 (-1), UKIP 8 (nc)
What if against all wisdom, there is a hardcore of people - old lefties set in their ways and young anti-capitalist types - who are boosting Corbyn's share of the vote? Add that to Labour's client vote of public sector types and is 31% impossible?
We're seeing these figures again and again and again.
It won't help him in the marginals, but it could explain the national share of vote holding up.
I can't believe it, but we'd be fools to discount the possibility entirely.0 -
The Spanish flu in 1918-19 took the young and the strong though....surbiton said:
Only a flu epidemic starting 6th June can minimise Labour's defeat.kle4 said:
There's an epidemic of the senile and infirm at just past age 54?! Why isn't that bigger news?justin124 said:
So Labour is going to be defeated by the senile and infirm?!!surbiton said:In the Opinium tables, VI all 10, if we add up the numbers voting 18-34, 35-44, 45-54,
we get, C 259, Lab 269.
However, Labour are massacred thereafter. 55+ C 315, Lab 99.
The subsets are hilarious. Wales Con 29, Lab 14, PC 4. In fact, Con 29 out of 62.
At this rate, they will win every seat in Wales!0 -
That one escaped me too. A quick google leads me to believe it is 'BOurgeois BOhemiam'.matt said:
Bobo?Sean_F said:
Students, university workers, Bobos think Corbyn is wonderful. Add Black and Muslim voters, people who maintain tribal loyalty to Labour, extreme left wingers, public sector unions, and 30% is quite feasible.kyf_100 said:
What if we're wrong and Corbyn really is picking up votes from the disenfranchised and disillusioned?SquareRoot said:
Labour are overstated. Does anyone really believe one in three will vote for Corbyn's party, with henchmen like McDonnell and Milne. I don'tRobD said:New ORB poll from the Telegraph?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/06/tories-course-gain-biggest-landslide-election-victory-seen-fifty/
CON 46 (+4), LAB 31 (nc), LD9 (-1), UKIP 8 (nc)
What if against all wisdom, there is a hardcore of people - old lefties set in their ways and young anti-capitalist types - who are boosting Corbyn's share of the vote? Add that to Labour's client vote of public sector types and is 31% impossible?
We're seeing these figures again and again and again.
It won't help him in the marginals, but it could explain the national share of vote holding up.
I can't believe it, but we'd be fools to discount the possibility entirely.
I've never heard that one before, but I saw an Observer article asking it was next after Hippy and Yuppie.
Personally I think hippy is making a comeback, at least in my own lexicon, though I prefer sandalista.0 -
Have Rallings and Thrasher offered an explanation yet?RobD said:
Final numbers on the BBC were Lab-142, UKIP -143. Although they report a lower number of Tory councillors (1439), so maybe they aren't final?logical_song said:UKIP managed to lose more councillors in England than Labour
Britain Elects @britainelects 22h22 hours ago
English results:
Con: 1,457 (+338)
Lab: 411 (-147)
LDem: 306 (-32)
Grn: 20 (-)
UKIP: 1 (-148)
Ind / Oth: 198 (-6)
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/lib-dems-set-to-gain-100-council-seats-djx8cn0xh0 -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9JDPm_QHk4Philip_Thompson said:You think 55 year olds are senile and infirm?
You're one sad, strange little man.
0 -
I suspected they underestimated the amount of UKIP voters switching to the Tories. Despite the LDs improving in vote share, the Tories improved more.Stark_Dawning said:
Have Rallings and Thrasher offered an explanation yet?RobD said:
Final numbers on the BBC were Lab-142, UKIP -143. Although they report a lower number of Tory councillors (1439), so maybe they aren't final?logical_song said:UKIP managed to lose more councillors in England than Labour
Britain Elects @britainelects 22h22 hours ago
English results:
Con: 1,457 (+338)
Lab: 411 (-147)
LDem: 306 (-32)
Grn: 20 (-)
UKIP: 1 (-148)
Ind / Oth: 198 (-6)
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/lib-dems-set-to-gain-100-council-seats-djx8cn0xh0 -
Surely you are looking at the latest possible announcements in that case: the CPS have a maximum of two years, not a minimum. On the other hand, would the expense returns for the more interesting seats have been submitted early?RobD said:
Especially with a CPS bombshell. I think the earliest possible announcement would be May 8th (Mon), if the MP under question submitted their expenses the day after the election (TSE, correct me if I am wrong)Sean_F said:
Students, university workers, Bobos think Corbyn is wonderful. Add Black and Muslim voters, people who maintain tribal loyalty to Labour, extreme left wingers, public sector unions, and 30% is quite feasible.kyf_100 said:
What if we're wrong and Corbyn really is picking up votes from the disenfranchised and disillusioned?SquareRoot said:
Labour are overstated. Does anyone really believe one in three will vote for Corbyn's party, with henchmen like McDonnell and Milne. I don'tRobD said:New ORB poll from the Telegraph?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/06/tories-course-gain-biggest-landslide-election-victory-seen-fifty/
CON 46 (+4), LAB 31 (nc), LD9 (-1), UKIP 8 (nc)
What if against all wisdom, there is a hardcore of people - old lefties set in their ways and young anti-capitalist types - who are boosting Corbyn's share of the vote? Add that to Labour's client vote of public sector types and is 31% impossible?
We're seeing these figures again and again and again.
It won't help him in the marginals, but it could explain the national share of vote holding up.
I can't believe it, but we'd be fools to discount the possibility entirely.0 -
They must be feeling disgruntled with their paper of choice then - is there now a columnist at the Guardian who hasn't proclaimed him an utter liability?SeanT said:
French term. The bohemian bourgeoisie. The best UK equivalent (and it is quite close) is Guardianista.matt said:
Bobo?Sean_F said:
Students, university workers, Bobos think Corbyn is wonderful. Add Black and Muslim voters, people who maintain tribal loyalty to Labour, extreme left wingers, public sector unions, and 30% is quite feasible.kyf_100 said:
What if we're wrong and Corbyn really is picking up votes from the disenfranchised and disillusioned?SquareRoot said:
Labour are overstated. Does anyone really believe one in three will vote for Corbyn's party, with henchmen like McDonnell and Milne. I don'tRobD said:New ORB poll from the Telegraph?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/06/tories-course-gain-biggest-landslide-election-victory-seen-fifty/
CON 46 (+4), LAB 31 (nc), LD9 (-1), UKIP 8 (nc)
What if against all wisdom, there is a hardcore of people - old lefties set in their ways and young anti-capitalist types - who are boosting Corbyn's share of the vote? Add that to Labour's client vote of public sector types and is 31% impossible?
We're seeing these figures again and again and again.
It won't help him in the marginals, but it could explain the national share of vote holding up.
I can't believe it, but we'd be fools to discount the possibility entirely.0 -
Bourgeois Bohemians.matt said:
Bobo?Sean_F said:
Students, university workers, Bobos think Corbyn is wonderful. Add Black and Muslim voters, people who maintain tribal loyalty to Labour, extreme left wingers, public sector unions, and 30% is quite feasible.kyf_100 said:
What if we're wrong and Corbyn really is picking up votes from the disenfranchised and disillusioned?SquareRoot said:
Labour are overstated. Does anyone really believe one in three will vote for Corbyn's party, with henchmen like McDonnell and Milne. I don'tRobD said:New ORB poll from the Telegraph?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/06/tories-course-gain-biggest-landslide-election-victory-seen-fifty/
CON 46 (+4), LAB 31 (nc), LD9 (-1), UKIP 8 (nc)
What if against all wisdom, there is a hardcore of people - old lefties set in their ways and young anti-capitalist types - who are boosting Corbyn's share of the vote? Add that to Labour's client vote of public sector types and is 31% impossible?
We're seeing these figures again and again and again.
It won't help him in the marginals, but it could explain the national share of vote holding up.
I can't believe it, but we'd be fools to discount the possibility entirely.0 -
I remember the eighties bubble, when it meant "Burnt out, but opulent".SeanT said:
French term. The bohemian bourgeoisie. The best UK equivalent (and it is quite close) is Guardianista.matt said:
Bobo?Sean_F said:
Students, university workers, Bobos think Corbyn is wonderful. Add Black and Muslim voters, people who maintain tribal loyalty to Labour, extreme left wingers, public sector unions, and 30% is quite feasible.kyf_100 said:
What if we're wrong and Corbyn really is picking up votes from the disenfranchised and disillusioned?SquareRoot said:
Labour are overstated. Does anyone really believe one in three will vote for Corbyn's party, with henchmen like McDonnell and Milne. I don'tRobD said:New ORB poll from the Telegraph?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/06/tories-course-gain-biggest-landslide-election-victory-seen-fifty/
CON 46 (+4), LAB 31 (nc), LD9 (-1), UKIP 8 (nc)
What if against all wisdom, there is a hardcore of people - old lefties set in their ways and young anti-capitalist types - who are boosting Corbyn's share of the vote? Add that to Labour's client vote of public sector types and is 31% impossible?
We're seeing these figures again and again and again.
It won't help him in the marginals, but it could explain the national share of vote holding up.
I can't believe it, but we'd be fools to discount the possibility entirely.
0 -
Public approval / disapproval of...
T. May: 46 / 33
J. Corbyn: 21 / 53
T. Farron: 14 / 39
P. Nuttall: 8 / 48
Fairly believable vote shares.0 -
The country which is currently arguing over whether the state should build a new central maternity hospital in Dublin and pass title to an order of particularly bigoted and unpleasant nuns.nunu said:
Beofre I clicked on it I thought it was a going to be in a Muslim country, not Ireland. LOL. Suprising.MTimT said:
I hope they charge him and it goes to court. Not because I think he should be punished - far from it, I hold blasphemy laws in contempt and cannot believe that such a law is compatible with the ECHR - but because listening to Fry take on whichever poor sod got the task of prosecuting him would be pure comedy gold.Floater said:
I saw that in the TelegraphFrancisUrquhart said:Bonkers...made comments 2 years ago, now the plod investigating.
Stephen Fry faces blasphemy probe after God comments
Officers are understood to be examining whether the British comedian committed a criminal offence under the Defamation Act when he appeared on RTE in 2015.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-39830447
Seriously, if people want to criticise religion let them.0 -
Damn, I can't let that narrative hook go unanswered...kle4 said:That one escaped me too. A quick google leads me to believe it is 'BOurgeois BOhemian'...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CU3mc0yvRNk
0 -
That idea has become something of a myth. It took infants, young adults and old adults. This is because, unlike most flus that bind in the nasal passages, this one bound deep in the lungs:MarqueeMark said:
The Spanish flu in 1918-19 took the young and the strong though....surbiton said:
Only a flu epidemic starting 6th June can minimise Labour's defeat.kle4 said:
There's an epidemic of the senile and infirm at just past age 54?! Why isn't that bigger news?justin124 said:
So Labour is going to be defeated by the senile and infirm?!!surbiton said:In the Opinium tables, VI all 10, if we add up the numbers voting 18-34, 35-44, 45-54,
we get, C 259, Lab 269.
However, Labour are massacred thereafter. 55+ C 315, Lab 99.
The subsets are hilarious. Wales Con 29, Lab 14, PC 4. In fact, Con 29 out of 62.
At this rate, they will win every seat in Wales!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1918_flu_pandemic#/media/File:W_curve.png
Also, epidemics don't hit everywhere all at once but come in waves over a period of time, hitting different parts of a country at different times - the Spanish flu came in 3 waves in the UK:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1918_flu_pandemic#/media/File:1918_spanish_flu_waves.gif0 -
ELBOW updated for ORB:RobD said:New ORB poll from the Telegraph?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/06/tories-course-gain-biggest-landslide-election-victory-seen-fifty/
CON 46 (+4), LAB 31 (nc), LD9 (-1), UKIP 8 (nc)
Con 47.00
Lab 28.67
LD 9.50
UKIP 6.67
Tory Lead 18.33 (was 18.22 last week).0 -
So the VI polls turn that into 10% of people will go well I think corbyn is utter shit but still going to vote labour. Having a giraffe.chestnut said:Public approval / disapproval of...
T. May: 46 / 33
J. Corbyn: 21 / 53
T. Farron: 14 / 39
P. Nuttall: 8 / 48
Fairly believable vote shares.0 -
My guess at present
CON 44%
LAB 28%
LIB 12%
UKIP 5%
GREEN 5%
For the Tories to breach 44% would in itself be quite an achievement. That hasn't happened since 1970 (when Labour actually lost with a vote share of 43%).
0 -
Those numbers are dire for Farron.chestnut said:Public approval / disapproval of...
T. May: 46 / 33
J. Corbyn: 21 / 53
T. Farron: 14 / 39
P. Nuttall: 8 / 48
Fairly believable vote shares.0 -
I love that song, although I confess with music I really don't pay much attention to the lyrics, which must upset many artists.viewcode said:
Damn, I can't let that narrative hook go unanswered...kle4 said:That one escaped me too. A quick google leads me to believe it is 'BOurgeois BOhemian'...
https://w.youtube.com/watch?v=CU3mc0yvRNk0 -
Thx. A very minority sport then.Sean_F said:
Bourgeois Bohemians.matt said:
Bobo?Sean_F said:
Students, university workers, Bobos think Corbyn is wonderful. Add Black and Muslim voters, people who maintain tribal loyalty to Labour, extreme left wingers, public sector unions, and 30% is quite feasible.kyf_100 said:
What if we're wrong and Corbyn really is picking up votes from the disenfranchised and disillusioned?SquareRoot said:
Labour are overstated. Does anyone really believe one in three will vote for Corbyn's party, with henchmen like McDonnell and Milne. I don'tRobD said:New ORB poll from the Telegraph?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/06/tories-course-gain-biggest-landslide-election-victory-seen-fifty/
CON 46 (+4), LAB 31 (nc), LD9 (-1), UKIP 8 (nc)
What if against all wisdom, there is a hardcore of people - old lefties set in their ways and young anti-capitalist types - who are boosting Corbyn's share of the vote? Add that to Labour's client vote of public sector types and is 31% impossible?
We're seeing these figures again and again and again.
It won't help him in the marginals, but it could explain the national share of vote holding up.
I can't believe it, but we'd be fools to discount the possibility entirely.0 -
I think they have a month to submit their claims. So the last deadline is June 7th. Some submit quick, some don't.Fysics_Teacher said:
Surely you are looking at the latest possible announcements in that case: the CPS have a maximum of two years, not a minimum. On the other hand, would the expense returns for the more interesting seats have been submitted early?RobD said:
Especially with a CPS bombshell. I think the earliest possible announcement would be May 8th (Mon), if the MP under question submitted their expenses the day after the election (TSE, correct me if I am wrong)Sean_F said:
Students, university workers, Bobos think Corbyn is wonderful. Add Black and Muslim voters, people who maintain tribal loyalty to Labour, extreme left wingers, public sector unions, and 30% is quite feasible.kyf_100 said:
What if we're wrong and Corbyn really is picking up votes from the disenfranchised and disillusioned?SquareRoot said:
Labour are overstated. Does anyone really believe one in three will vote for Corbyn's party, with henchmen like McDonnell and Milne. I don'tRobD said:New ORB poll from the Telegraph?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/06/tories-course-gain-biggest-landslide-election-victory-seen-fifty/
CON 46 (+4), LAB 31 (nc), LD9 (-1), UKIP 8 (nc)
What if against all wisdom, there is a hardcore of people - old lefties set in their ways and young anti-capitalist types - who are boosting Corbyn's share of the vote? Add that to Labour's client vote of public sector types and is 31% impossible?
We're seeing these figures again and again and again.
It won't help him in the marginals, but it could explain the national share of vote holding up.
I can't believe it, but we'd be fools to discount the possibility entirely.0 -
I am well over 55 and neither senile nor infirm.justin124 said:
So Labour is going to be defeated by the senile and infirm?!!surbiton said:In the Opinium tables, VI all 10, if we add up the numbers voting 18-34, 35-44, 45-54,
we get, C 259, Lab 269.
However, Labour are massacred thereafter. 55+ C 315, Lab 99.
The subsets are hilarious. Wales Con 29, Lab 14, PC 4. In fact, Con 29 out of 62.
At this rate, they will win every seat in Wales!
But making comments like that reminds me that mental faculties start deteriorating at a much earlier age if you don't look after yourself or stigmatise groups of people you don't know..
:-)0 -
Need a D for the present incaranation, Dubai.SeanT said:
80s/90s sociopolitical acronyms were fun. Remember the FILTH = Failed In London, Try Hong kong?foxinsoxuk said:
I remember the eighties bubble, when it meant "Burnt out, but opulent".SeanT said:
French term. The bohemian bourgeoisie. The best UK equivalent (and it is quite close) is Guardianista.matt said:
Bobo?Sean_F said:
Students, university workers, Bobos think Corbyn is wonderful. Add Black and Muslim voters, people who maintain tribal loyalty to Labour, extreme left wingers, public sector unions, and 30% is quite feasible.kyf_100 said:
What if we're wrong and Corbyn really is picking up votes from the disenfranchised and disillusioned?SquareRoot said:
Labour are overstated. Does anyone really believe one in three will vote for Corbyn's party, with henchmen like McDonnell and Milne. I don'tRobD said:New ORB poll from the Telegraph?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/06/tories-course-gain-biggest-landslide-election-victory-seen-fifty/
CON 46 (+4), LAB 31 (nc), LD9 (-1), UKIP 8 (nc)
What if against all wisdom, there is a hardcore of people - old lefties set in their ways and young anti-capitalist types - who are boosting Corbyn's share of the vote? Add that to Labour's client vote of public sector types and is 31% impossible?
We're seeing these figures again and again and again.
It won't help him in the marginals, but it could explain the national share of vote holding up.
I can't believe it, but we'd be fools to discount the possibility entirely.
Also the "Lombards", from Lombard St in the City, and after Thatcher's Big Bang.
= Lot Of Money But A Right Dickhead.0 -
Bit of a delay, but just caught up with Isle of Wight gossip after a visit from my Sister and let us say Mr Turner has not been popular on the Island for a long time and was only voted for by the old codgers on the Island because of his rosette.
The local party has tried to deselect him for a long time and I've now got all the gossip on the personal issues that would effect anyone's ability to do the job properly. I have a friend whose parents are involved in the local party.
His public slip up at the school was the excuse needed to give him the boot, no one is sad to see him go.0 -
All those thinking the election expenses could hurt the Tories, is there more danger of a wikileaks / Russian hack against the Tories being the black swan event?
They will definitely prefer the idiot communist lot who are feedle on security to Mrs stick it up your junker.0 -
DINKYs = Double Income, No Kids Yet.SeanT said:
80s/90s sociopolitical acronyms were fun. Remember the FILTH = Failed In London, Try Hong kong?foxinsoxuk said:
I remember the eighties bubble, when it meant "Burnt out, but opulent".SeanT said:
French term. The bohemian bourgeoisie. The best UK equivalent (and it is quite close) is Guardianista.matt said:
Bobo?Sean_F said:
Students, university workers, Bobos think Corbyn is wonderful. Add Black and Muslim voters, people who maintain tribal loyalty to Labour, extreme left wingers, public sector unions, and 30% is quite feasible.kyf_100 said:
What if we're wrong and Corbyn really is picking up votes from the disenfranchised and disillusioned?SquareRoot said:
Labour are overstated. Does anyone really believe one in three will vote for Corbyn's party, with henchmen like McDonnell and Milne. I don'tRobD said:New ORB poll from the Telegraph?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/06/tories-course-gain-biggest-landslide-election-victory-seen-fifty/
CON 46 (+4), LAB 31 (nc), LD9 (-1), UKIP 8 (nc)
What if against all wisdom, there is a hardcore of people - old lefties set in their ways and young anti-capitalist types - who are boosting Corbyn's share of the vote? Add that to Labour's client vote of public sector types and is 31% impossible?
We're seeing these figures again and again and again.
It won't help him in the marginals, but it could explain the national share of vote holding up.
I can't believe it, but we'd be fools to discount the possibility entirely.
Also the "Lombards", from Lombard St in the City, and after Thatcher's Big Bang.
= Lot Of Money But A Right Dickhead.
I think I'm the only one who remembers BCBG - bon chic, bon genre - but it never really caught on in England0 -
Those are the 1983 shares for Con and Lab. Looks about right to me, although I'd put the smaller parties slightly higher, eg. Con 42%, Lab 26%, LD 14%, UKIP 7%, Green 5%.houndtang said:My guess at present
CON 44%
LAB 28%
LIB 12%
UKIP 5%
GREEN 5%
For the Tories to breach 44% would in itself be quite an achievement. That hasn't happened since 1970 (when Labour actually lost with a vote share of 43%).0 -
I love it too, tho' it came from the very early Noughties, which was a bit of a awkward time in musickle4 said:
I love that song, although I confess with music I really don't pay much attention to the lyrics, which must upset many artists.viewcode said:
Damn, I can't let that narrative hook go unanswered...kle4 said:That one escaped me too. A quick google leads me to believe it is 'BOurgeois BOhemian'...
https://w.youtube.com/watch?v=CU3mc0yvRNk0 -
I'm struggling to think of a revelation that could possibly derail Theresa right now. As Home Secretary she deliberately waived visa restrictions in the full knowledge that the applicants were Jihadist terrorists?FrancisUrquhart said:All those thinking the election expenses could hurt the Tories, is there more danger of a wikileaks / Russian hack against the Tories being the black swan event?
They will definitely prefer the idiot communist lot who are feedle on security to Mrs stick it up your junker.0 -
It's getting that way!matt said:
Need a D for the present incaranation, Dubai.SeanT said:
80s/90s sociopolitical acronyms were fun. Remember the FILTH = Failed In London, Try Hong kong?foxinsoxuk said:
I remember the eighties bubble, when it meant "Burnt out, but opulent".SeanT said:
French term. The bohemian bourgeoisie. The best UK equivalent (and it is quite close) is Guardianista.matt said:
Bobo?Sean_F said:
Students, university workers, Bobos think Corbyn is wonderful. Add Black and Muslim voters, people who maintain tribal loyalty to Labour, extreme left wingers, public sector unions, and 30% is quite feasible.kyf_100 said:
What if we're wrong and Corbyn really is picking up votes from the disenfranchised and disillusioned?SquareRoot said:
Labour are overstated. Does anyone really believe one in three will vote for Corbyn's party, with henchmen like McDonnell and Milne. I don'tRobD said:New ORB poll from the Telegraph?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/06/tories-course-gain-biggest-landslide-election-victory-seen-fifty/
CON 46 (+4), LAB 31 (nc), LD9 (-1), UKIP 8 (nc)
What if against all wisdom, there is a hardcore of people - old lefties set in their ways and young anti-capitalist types - who are boosting Corbyn's share of the vote? Add that to Labour's client vote of public sector types and is 31% impossible?
We're seeing these figures again and again and again.
It won't help him in the marginals, but it could explain the national share of vote holding up.
I can't believe it, but we'd be fools to discount the possibility entirely.
Also the "Lombards", from Lombard St in the City, and after Thatcher's Big Bang.
= Lot Of Money But A Right Dickhead.0 -
I'd go:IanB2 said:
UKIP and Green look a tad high?MTimT said:Is there going to be an election prediction competition this time? FWIW, for the GB vote, I'll go for something like:
Tories 45.6%
Labour 24.7%
LDs 11.8%
UKIP 6.9%
Greens 5.4%
SNP 5.0%
Others the balance
Tories ....... 43.5%
Labour ...... 27.7%
LibDem ..... 13.3%
UKIP ........... 5.2%
Greens ....... 4.1%
SNP ............ 4.8%
Others ........ 1.4%
Tory Seats: 385 = 120 Overall Majority0 -
RobD said:
I think they have a month to submit their claims. So the last deadline is June 7th. Some submit quick, some don't.Fysics_Teacher said:
Surely you are looking at the latest possible announcements in that case: the CPS have a maximum of two years, not a minimum. On the other hand, would the expense returns for the more interesting seats have been submitted early?RobD said:
Especially with a CPS bombshell. I think the earliest possible announcement would be May 8th (Mon), if the MP under question submitted their expenses the day after the election (TSE, correct me if I am wrong)Sean_F said:
Students, university workers, Bobos think Corbyn is wonderful. Add Black and Muslim voters, people who maintain tribal loyalty to Labour, extreme left wingers, public sector unions, and 30% is quite feasible.kyf_100 said:
What if we're wrong and Corbyn really is picking up votes from the disenfranchised and disillusioned?SquareRoot said:
Labour are overstated. Does anyone really believe one in three will vote for Corbyn's party, with henchmen like McDonnell and Milne. I don'tRobD said:New ORB poll from the Telegraph?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/06/tories-course-gain-biggest-landslide-election-victory-seen-fifty/
CON 46 (+4), LAB 31 (nc), LD9 (-1), UKIP 8 (nc)
What if against all wisdom, there is a hardcore of people - old lefties set in their ways and young anti-capitalist types - who are boosting Corbyn's share of the vote? Add that to Labour's client vote of public sector types and is 31% impossible?
We're seeing these figures again and again and again.
It won't help him in the marginals, but it could explain the national share of vote holding up.
I can't believe it, but we'd be fools to discount the possibility entirely.
But the CPS don't have to wait to the last minute. So they are delaying it because:-
a) They don't have a case and want to make everyone wait.
b) It's a complex case and they need to consider it as carefully as possible.
c) They hate the Tories and want to damage them as much as possible.
Any other reasons?
0 -
d) The Tory Party was uncooperative.MarkHopkins said:RobD said:
I think they have a month to submit their claims. So the last deadline is June 7th. Some submit quick, some don't.Fysics_Teacher said:
Surely you are looking at the latest possible announcements in that case: the CPS have a maximum of two years, not a minimum. On the other hand, would the expense returns for the more interesting seats have been submitted early?RobD said:
Especially with a CPS bombshell. I think the earliest possible announcement would be May 8th (Mon), if the MP under question submitted their expenses the day after the election (TSE, correct me if I am wrong)Sean_F said:
Students, university workers, Bobos think Corbyn is wonderful. Add Black and Muslim voters, people who maintain tribal loyalty to Labour, extreme left wingers, public sector unions, and 30% is quite feasible.kyf_100 said:
What if we're wrong and Corbyn really is picking up votes from the disenfranchised and disillusioned?SquareRoot said:
Labour are overstated. Does anyone really believe one in three will vote for Corbyn's party, with henchmen like McDonnell and Milne. I don'tRobD said:New ORB poll from the Telegraph?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/06/tories-course-gain-biggest-landslide-election-victory-seen-fifty/
CON 46 (+4), LAB 31 (nc), LD9 (-1), UKIP 8 (nc)
What if against all wisdom, there is a hardcore of people - old lefties set in their ways and young anti-capitalist types - who are boosting Corbyn's share of the vote? Add that to Labour's client vote of public sector types and is 31% impossible?
We're seeing these figures again and again and again.
It won't help him in the marginals, but it could explain the national share of vote holding up.
I can't believe it, but we'd be fools to discount the possibility entirely.
But the CPS don't have to wait to the last minute. So they are delaying it because:-
a) They don't have a case and want to make everyone wait.
b) It's a complex case and they need to consider it as carefully as possible.
c) They hate the Tories and want to damage them as much as possible.
Any other reasons?
e) The Tory Party went to court to stop this happening.0 -
-
I'd be absolutely shitting myself now if I were doing IT for one of the major parties. To the point of hiring some ex-GCHQ and MI6 guys to run information security, and of seriously exploring the dusting off of fax machines and conference call equipment for the really confidential stuff. Not getting hacked when the Russians really want to do it, is bloody hard work.FrancisUrquhart said:All those thinking the election expenses could hurt the Tories, is there more danger of a wikileaks / Russian hack against the Tories being the black swan event?
They will definitely prefer the idiot communist lot who are feedle on security to Mrs stick it up your junker.0 -
Andy - your numbers are almost identical to mine. I have Con 2+ higher, and Lab and LD 1+ lower.AndyJS said:
Those are the 1983 shares for Con and Lab. Looks about right to me, although I'd put the smaller parties slightly higher, eg. Con 42%, Lab 26%, LD 14%, UKIP 7%, Green 5%.houndtang said:My guess at present
CON 44%
LAB 28%
LIB 12%
UKIP 5%
GREEN 5%
For the Tories to breach 44% would in itself be quite an achievement. That hasn't happened since 1970 (when Labour actually lost with a vote share of 43%).0 -
I suppose the bobos are up against the NAPs, the true bourgeoisie of Neuilly, Auteuil and Passy on the leafy western fringes of Paris. The Le Pen family with their villa in Saint Cloud are part of that set, despite their pretended common touch.0
-
Isn't it entirely in the CPS' hands now? The decision is based on the information in the case fileTheScreamingEagles said:
d) The Tory Party was uncooperative.MarkHopkins said:RobD said:
I think they have a month to submit their claims. So the last deadline is June 7th. Some submit quick, some don't.Fysics_Teacher said:
Surely you are looking at the latest possible announcements in that case: the CPS have a maximum of two years, not a minimum. On the other hand, would the expense returns for the more interesting seats have been submitted early?RobD said:
Especially with a CPS bombshell. I think the earliest possible announcement would be May 8th (Mon), if the MP under question submitted their expenses the day after the election (TSE, correct me if I am wrong)Sean_F said:
Students, university workers, Bobos think Corbyn is wonderful. Add Black and Muslim voters, people who maintain tribal loyalty to Labour, extreme left wingers, public sector unions, and 30% is quite feasible.kyf_100 said:
What if we're wrong and Corbyn really is picking up votes from the disenfranchised and disillusioned?SquareRoot said:
Labour are overstated. Does anyone really believe one in three will vote for Corbyn's party, with henchmen like McDonnell and Milne. I don'tRobD said:New ORB poll from the Telegraph?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/06/tories-course-gain-biggest-landslide-election-victory-seen-fifty/
CON 46 (+4), LAB 31 (nc), LD9 (-1), UKIP 8 (nc)
What if against all wisdom, there is a hardcore of people - old lefties set in their ways and young anti-capitalist types - who are boosting Corbyn's share of the vote? Add that to Labour's client vote of public sector types and is 31% impossible?
We're seeing these figures again and again and again.
It won't help him in the marginals, but it could explain the national share of vote holding up.
I can't believe it, but we'd be fools to discount the possibility entirely.
But the CPS don't have to wait to the last minute. So they are delaying it because:-
a) They don't have a case and want to make everyone wait.
b) It's a complex case and they need to consider it as carefully as possible.
c) They hate the Tories and want to damage them as much as possible.
Any other reasons?
e) The Tory Party went to court to stop this happening.0 -
Very nice out that way. I was a little further out at Maisons Lafitte for a while, right by the chateau.FF43 said:I suppose the bobos are up against the NAPs, the true bourgeoisie of Neuilly, Auteuil and Passy on the leafy western fringes of Paris. The Le Pen family with their villa in Saint Cloud are part of that set, despite their pretended common touch.
0 -
It is, but it is dependant on say if the likes of Craig Mackinlay exercised their right to silence when they were questioned under caution.RobD said:
Isn't it entirely in the CPS' hands now? The decision is based on the information in the case file
That might make the job of the CPS that much harder.0 -
Liverpool fans to unveil huge Jeremy Corbyn banner at Anfield tomorrow
0 -
I hope diane abbott didn't have anything to do with the measurements!bigjohnowls said:Liverpool fans to unveil huge Jeremy Corbyn banner at Anfield tomorrow
0 -
FrancisUrquhart said:
I hope diane abbott didn't have anything to do with the measurements!bigjohnowls said:Liverpool fans to unveil huge Jeremy Corbyn banner at Anfield tomorrow
It will be a massive 4" x 2".
0 -
Please let it be JICIPM in huge letters.bigjohnowls said:Liverpool fans to unveil huge Jeremy Corbyn banner at Anfield tomorrow
0 -
A minute's silence for the Labour Party?bigjohnowls said:Liverpool fans to unveil huge Jeremy Corbyn banner at Anfield tomorrow
0 -
LOLRobD said:
Please let it be JICIPM in huge letters.bigjohnowls said:Liverpool fans to unveil huge Jeremy Corbyn banner at Anfield tomorrow
0 -
"You'll Never Walk Alone ....bigjohnowls said:Liverpool fans to unveil huge Jeremy Corbyn banner at Anfield tomorrow
Into The Electoral Abyss
You'll Take Dozens Of Labour MP With You ...."0 -
Re France - is tomorrrow Hollande's last day or is there a transistional period0
-
A massive black armband, to commemorate the passing of the Labour Party?bigjohnowls said:Liverpool fans to unveil huge Jeremy Corbyn banner at Anfield tomorrow
0 -
The inauguration is the following weekend.Big_G_NorthWales said:Re France - is tomorrrow Hollande's last day or is there a transistional period
0 -
There was a nine day transitional period last time.Big_G_NorthWales said:Re France - is tomorrrow Hollande's last day or is there a transistional period
0 -
The Scousers' notorious tendency to mark disasters continues, I see.bigjohnowls said:Liverpool fans to unveil huge Jeremy Corbyn banner at Anfield tomorrow
0 -
spit it out then.. if you haven't already....MarqueeMark said:
The Spanish flu in 1918-19 took the young and the strong though....surbiton said:
Only a flu epidemic starting 6th June can minimise Labour's defeat.kle4 said:
There's an epidemic of the senile and infirm at just past age 54?! Why isn't that bigger news?justin124 said:
So Labour is going to be defeated by the senile and infirm?!!surbiton said:In the Opinium tables, VI all 10, if we add up the numbers voting 18-34, 35-44, 45-54,
we get, C 259, Lab 269.
However, Labour are massacred thereafter. 55+ C 315, Lab 99.
The subsets are hilarious. Wales Con 29, Lab 14, PC 4. In fact, Con 29 out of 62.
At this rate, they will win every seat in Wales!0 -
Also re France - the media are going to saturate the news channels tomorrow and monday at least, so doubt any of the manifestos will be forthcoming before mid week0
-
Never will the mocking words "sign on, sign on, with a pen in your hand, 'cos you'll never get a job" be more appropriate.JackW said:
"You'll Never Walk Alone ....bigjohnowls said:Liverpool fans to unveil huge Jeremy Corbyn banner at Anfield tomorrow
Into The Electoral Abyss
You'll Take Dozens Of Labour MP With You ...."0 -
I heard some background to one of the cases today. 12 "charges" were being investigated by the police relating to expenses.RobD said:
Isn't it entirely in the CPS' hands now? The decision is based on the information in the case file
One was - why were there no receipts submitted for their Facebook page?
Another was - why was there no receipt for an advert in the local paper where the by now MP thanked the voters for their support.
Another was a claim that the then Home Secretary, now PM, arrived in the constituency in a second, secret trip by the battle-bus - rather than driven in by Special Branch minders.
On and on. Nonsense, top to bottom.0