Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Expectations management or the harbinger of a truly terrible n

1356

Comments

  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @DPJHodges: Labour source re-Copeland: "Early samples look like we will win".
  • Options

    Lib Dems gain South Hams from Conservative

    And Dr Sarah Wollaston is quaking in her boots.....
    She is a LD.
  • Options
    Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905

    Presumably the towns in Copeland will be the first to send in ballot boxes. They'll be more Labour, you'd have thought.

    Indeed. As would probably be predicted, an analysis of the constituency suggests that all of the Labour voting wards are in Whitehaven and closely surrounding areas. The more rural areas are all Tory.

    http://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/pol2d_Copeland.html
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,698
    edited February 2017
    I just spoke to Andrew Stephenson, the Tory MP for Pendle, who is putting the brakes on any runaway triumphalism among his party colleagues. He said:

    It’s too early in the evening to say. This was always going to be an uphill battle for us. This has been a Labour seat for over 80 years and that Labour vote has been fairly stable over the years.

    I’ve spent the last couple of weeks knocking on doors here and it’s clear there is no enthusiasm for the Labour party. But at the same time there are a lot of people who for generations have voted Labour and that core vote is still there. Whether it’s going to turn out today, we don’t know yet.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/live/2017/feb/23/stoke-and-copeland-byelections-voting-almost-over-as-labour-hope-to-hold-seats-politics-live
  • Options
    MortimerMortimer Posts: 13,960
    From QT tonight, Justine G is becoming a grammar school convert, it seems. Good lass.

    Come on TSE. You'll cave eventually....
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,578

    Lib Dems gain South Hams from Conservative

    And Dr Sarah Wollaston is quaking in her boots.....
    As I said it would at the weekend
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @DPJHodges: Tories: "Early Whitehaven [Copeland] boxes show Labour doing similar to 2015".
  • Options
    bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 21,912
    Oh dear now Dan is predicting a Lab win

    (((Dan Hodges)))Verified account‏@DPJHodges 2m2 minutes ago
    More
    Labour source re-Copeland: "Early samples look like we will win".
  • Options
    Labour List Live blog on the by-elections:

    http://labourlist.org/2017/02/copeland-and-stoke-central-liveblog/
  • Options
    MarkSeniorMarkSenior Posts: 4,699
    12 Conservative council defences so far this year . Held 3 Lost 9 - 1 to Lab 1 to Ind 7 to Lib Dems
  • Options
    Danny565Danny565 Posts: 8,091
    If Labour turn out to win, Dimbleby must have one hell of a source.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,028
    Regarding Copeland I don't think the Tories are worth 1.5 or so. Perhaps around 1.8, but not 1.5...
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    Lib Dems gain South Hams from Conservative

    And Dr Sarah Wollaston is quaking in her boots.....
    She is a LD.
    No, she is a Tory, just a fairly sensible one nation Tory!
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,087
    Well I'm off. Occurs to me now I know the name of the Labour candidate in Copeland but not the Tory. Clearly I'm not in the seat and targeted, but I wonder if its notable that despite being betting favourites I never noted who this prospective winner was.

    Here's hoping for tight results at the least so Labour get a goddamn grip no matter what, and my wallet would prefer it be two holds.
  • Options

    But at the same time there are a lot of people who for generations have voted Labour and that core vote is still there.

    Donkeys.

    If that's the case, there has been no sea change, and all the northern seats are probably safe for Labour for another generation.
  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383
    International Spectator
    BREAKING: Alphabet, Google's parent company, has accused Uber of stealing parts of its self-driving car technology
  • Options
    MortimerMortimer Posts: 13,960
    The idea that Angela Rayner could ever be leader of a political party is simply laughable. She is just a bang a drum trade unionist, isn't she.


    CUTS CRISIS AHHHH TORIES.
  • Options
    viewcodeviewcode Posts: 19,160
    So, quick summary.

    Thinks

    We don't actually know anything yet, do we?
  • Options
    Scott_P said:

    @DPJHodges: Tories: "Early Whitehaven [Copeland] boxes show Labour doing similar to 2015".

    So Copeland too close to call (higher Tory turnout might steal it) but Stoke a comfortable Labour win.

    I'm too tired and can't be arsed.

    See you in the morning.
  • Options
    RoyalBlueRoyalBlue Posts: 3,223
    viewcode said:

    So, quick summary.

    Thinks

    We don't actually know anything yet, do we?

    Are you new to politicalbetting.com?
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,087

    But at the same time there are a lot of people who for generations have voted Labour and that core vote is still there.

    Donkeys.

    If that's the case, there has been no sea change, and all the northern seats are probably safe for Labour for another generation.
    And so they may rebuild, no matter what. No one is replacing them anytime soon, if they survive the next year.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,028
    viewcode said:

    So, quick summary.

    Thinks

    We don't actually know anything yet, do we?

    I think I do, but I don't like to count chickens and all that.
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    Mortimer said:

    The idea that Angela Rayner could ever be leader of a political party is simply laughable. She is just a bang a drum trade unionist, isn't she.


    CUTS CRISIS AHHHH TORIES.

    Yeah these oiks should clear off and leave it for the poshos with PPE.
  • Options
    kle4 said:

    Well I'm off. Occurs to me now I know the name of the Labour candidate in Copeland but not the Tory. Clearly I'm not in the seat and targeted, but I wonder if its notable that despite being betting favourites I never noted who this prospective winner was.

    Here's hoping for tight results at the least so Labour get a goddamn grip no matter what, and my wallet would prefer it be two holds.

    It's quite simple - the Labour candidate is the Maternity Hospital and the Tory candidate is the Power Station.
  • Options
    DanSmithDanSmith Posts: 1,215
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,218
    edited February 2017

    Scott_P said:

    @DPJHodges: Tories: "Early Whitehaven [Copeland] boxes show Labour doing similar to 2015".

    So Copeland too close to call (higher Tory turnout might steal it) but Stoke a comfortable Labour win.

    I'm too tired and can't be arsed.

    See you in the morning.
    Yes, Copeland is now Labour Whitehaven v Tory villages, if the latter has turned out more the Tories could yet scrape home
  • Options
    HurstLlamaHurstLlama Posts: 9,098
    Scott_P said:

    @DPJHodges: Labour source re-Copeland: "Early samples look like we will win".

    I don't know what "early samples" are. Counting won't even have started yet (the number of voting papers in the ballot boxes have to verified against the number issued first) and representatives of the different candidates are not allowed to approach close to the counting tables. God only knows what Hodge's source is talking about.
  • Options

    Mortimer said:

    The idea that Angela Rayner could ever be leader of a political party is simply laughable. She is just a bang a drum trade unionist, isn't she.


    CUTS CRISIS AHHHH TORIES.

    Yeah these oiks should clear off and leave it for the poshos with PPE.
    Current PM is neither, nor was the last lady PM......
  • Options
    FloaterFloater Posts: 14,195

    Kettering Barton Lib Dem gain from Con

    LD 644
    Con 337
    UKIP 106
    Green 42

    Most important result of the night :-)
  • Options
    DanSmithDanSmith Posts: 1,215
  • Options
    viewcodeviewcode Posts: 19,160
    RoyalBlue said:

    viewcode said:

    So, quick summary.

    Thinks

    We don't actually know anything yet, do we?

    Are you new to politicalbetting.com?
    :)
  • Options
    viewcodeviewcode Posts: 19,160
    Pulpstar said:

    viewcode said:

    So, quick summary.

    Thinks

    We don't actually know anything yet, do we?

    I think I do, but I don't like to count chickens and all that.
    Good luck
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @jonnymorris: #stokebyelection Stoke postal vote sampling- 31% labour with Tories and UKIP both on 29%
  • Options
    Goddamnit, I've already spent my laying UKIP in Stoke winnings.
  • Options
    BojabobBojabob Posts: 642
    RobD said:

    Bojabob said:

    Let's hope @Danny565 is right and a defeat in Copeland is enough to see off Corbyn. The PLP should guarantee nominations to Rebecca Long-Bailey. Think Nandy would beat her. Took the 11/4 on the Labour double a few days back but neither hope nor expect to win it. Labour will hold Stoke by about 1,000 votes I think.

    Another forgotten password?
    I deliberately mangled it to stop me posting for a few days (I needed a break) then couldn't change it back!
  • Options
  • Options
    MortimerMortimer Posts: 13,960

    Mortimer said:

    The idea that Angela Rayner could ever be leader of a political party is simply laughable. She is just a bang a drum trade unionist, isn't she.


    CUTS CRISIS AHHHH TORIES.

    Yeah these oiks should clear off and leave it for the poshos with PPE.
    Revealing of your prejudices there perhaps?

    I'm not commenting on anything other than the fact that she is the worst sort of 'anti-Tory' pro state spending at any and all costs socialist. I thought they'd gone out with the ark......

  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @BBCRichardMoss: Sources at #CopelandByElection count suggesting on ballot boxes looked at so far, it's all square but postal votes may help Conservatives
  • Options
    viewcodeviewcode Posts: 19,160
    isam said:
    Postal vote sampling is illegal, isn't it? Or is that just before the polls close?
  • Options
    tpfkartpfkar Posts: 1,548

    Scott_P said:

    @DPJHodges: Labour source re-Copeland: "Early samples look like we will win".

    I don't know what "early samples" are. Counting won't even have started yet (the number of voting papers in the ballot boxes have to verified against the number issued first) and representatives of the different candidates are not allowed to approach close to the counting tables. God only knows what Hodge's source is talking about.
    That's not the case in my experience - the verification is face up so the counting agents get all their information from this phase. "Early samples" makes good sense as long as representative and weighted
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 41,059
    edited February 2017
    Scott_P said:

    @jonnymorris: #stokebyelection Stoke postal vote sampling- 31% labour with Tories and UKIP both on 29%

    Doesn't that make 1.12 a massive LAY?

    I took a fiver of the Tories at 108
  • Options
    Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905

    But at the same time there are a lot of people who for generations have voted Labour and that core vote is still there.

    Donkeys.

    If that's the case, there has been no sea change, and all the northern seats are probably safe for Labour for another generation.
    If the dire national polling does continue then I am quite sure it will be reflected in seats changing hands in a general election - which is, of course, a whole different ball game. Copeland is just the sort of place which, if it doesn't fall now, is primed to do so then.

    The issue for Labour is not, of course, that it is liable to be wiped out - merely that it will be driven back into deep heartland territories where the habit/cultural loyalty vote, and large concentrations of other voter groups still interested in voting Labour under Corbyn, reside. And there, on something well short of 200 seats post-boundary change, Labour will sit forever - unless it finally comes to its senses, or it is slowly and painstakingly worn down by an alternative party able to appeal in these areas in a way that currently eludes the Conservatives.
  • Options
    BojabobBojabob Posts: 642
  • Options
    I doubt the Tories will win Stoke, but 120/1 to win is utterly silly.

    I've nibbled £3 of that.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,087
    Last note, but if Labour do contrive to lose either of these seats, are there any MPs left in Lab who have not either already resigned from or refuse to serve in the shadow cabinet to take the place of any further resignations?
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    I don't know how Dimbleby can make an assessment of who's going to win the by-elections while in the middle of presenting Question Time.
  • Options
    isam said:

    Scott_P said:

    @jonnymorris: #stokebyelection Stoke postal vote sampling- 31% labour with Tories and UKIP both on 29%

    Doesn't that make 1.12 a massive LAY?

    I took a fiver of the Tories at 108
    Labour will win on the day I expect, so it means Tories/UKIP again near tied for 2nd place with Labour fairly comfortably winning.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 59,022
    AndyJS said:

    I don't know how Dimbleby can make an assessment of who's going to win the by-elections while in the middle of presenting Question Time.

    The Dimbleby is all knowing.
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 41,059
    viewcode said:

    isam said:
    Postal vote sampling is illegal, isn't it? Or is that just before the polls close?
    I don't even know what it is.. but it cant mean a 1.12 fav can it?
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    Scott_P said:

    @jonnymorris: #stokebyelection Stoke postal vote sampling- 31% labour with Tories and UKIP both on 29%

    Whoops, Betfair wrong again in that case...
  • Options
    BojabobBojabob Posts: 642
    @DanSmith

    Even Corbyn won't withstand a double defeat surely? Not that I think it's likely.
  • Options
    viewcode said:

    isam said:
    Postal vote sampling is illegal, isn't it? Or is that just before the polls close?
    Yah, you can do the verification before the polls close.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,218
    viewcode said:

    isam said:
    Postal vote sampling is illegal, isn't it? Or is that just before the polls close?
    Not once they start counting them it is not
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    Mortimer said:

    The idea that Angela Rayner could ever be leader of a political party is simply laughable. She is just a bang a drum trade unionist, isn't she.


    CUTS CRISIS AHHHH TORIES.

    Yeah these oiks should clear off and leave it for the poshos with PPE.
    Current PM is neither, nor was the last lady PM......
    Yep, they did other degrees at Oxford. Such diversity is why places like Stoke and Copeland feel abandoned by Westminster. Politics is for Oxford grads, not the rest of us.
  • Options
    Popcorn!

    UKIP’s only MP dramatically conceded the Stoke by-election – saying the party’s new leader had lost to Labour. Douglas Carswell said it was “likely” Labour had held the seat just 45 minutes after the polls closed.

    UKIP’s Douglas Carswell shocked Question Time audiences when he claimed it was ‘likely’ Labour had held the Stoke seat It sparked an immediate bout of infighting, with claims he personally blocked a knighthood for Nigel Farage – which he denied. But it sets the stage for a fresh civil war today if the result is confirmed.


    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2943022/ukips-douglas-carswell-concedes-defeat-in-stoke-central-as-its-claimed-leader-paul-nuttall-could-finish-third/
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,028
    edited February 2017
    isam said:

    viewcode said:

    isam said:
    Postal vote sampling is illegal, isn't it? Or is that just before the polls close?
    I don't even know what it is.. but it cant mean a 1.12 fav can it?
    Good enough for me to get rid of UKIP betfair liability.

    I hope it is that close now !
  • Options

    Mortimer said:

    The idea that Angela Rayner could ever be leader of a political party is simply laughable. She is just a bang a drum trade unionist, isn't she.


    CUTS CRISIS AHHHH TORIES.

    Yeah these oiks should clear off and leave it for the poshos with PPE.
    Current PM is neither, nor was the last lady PM......
    Yep, they did other degrees at Oxford. Such diversity is why places like Stoke and Copeland feel abandoned by Westminster. Politics is for Oxford grads, not the rest of us.
    Lectures from Lib Dems on diversity! Whitest, malest party in the Hoc!
  • Options
    *Note to self*

    I am crap at betting on by-elections.

    *End note to self*
  • Options
    DanSmithDanSmith Posts: 1,215
    (((Dan Hodges)))Verified account‏@DPJHodges 40s41 seconds ago
    More
    Hold the mayo. Source at the Copeland count now tells me Tory boxes held up by closure of A66. Now neck and neck.

    Ignore Dan Hodges basically.
  • Options

    Popcorn!

    UKIP’s only MP dramatically conceded the Stoke by-election – saying the party’s new leader had lost to Labour. Douglas Carswell said it was “likely” Labour had held the seat just 45 minutes after the polls closed.

    UKIP’s Douglas Carswell shocked Question Time audiences when he claimed it was ‘likely’ Labour had held the Stoke seat It sparked an immediate bout of infighting, with claims he personally blocked a knighthood for Nigel Farage – which he denied. But it sets the stage for a fresh civil war today if the result is confirmed.


    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2943022/ukips-douglas-carswell-concedes-defeat-in-stoke-central-as-its-claimed-leader-paul-nuttall-could-finish-third/

    It takes a certain chutzpah, for a single member party to have a back bench rebellion.
  • Options
    NeilVWNeilVW Posts: 726
    edited February 2017
    isam said:
    Isn't postal vote turnout usually higher than on-the-day turnout?
  • Options
    DanSmithDanSmith Posts: 1,215

    *Note to self*

    I am crap at betting on by-elections.

    *End note to self*

    hold your nerve !
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,190
    isam said:
    UKIP postals sent back before Nuttall was seen to be such a pillock?
  • Options
    RoyalBlueRoyalBlue Posts: 3,223

    *Note to self*

    I am crap at betting on by-elections.

    *End note to self*

    I thought you were going to bed :tongue:
  • Options
    nunununu Posts: 6,024
    (Dan Hodges)))Verified account‏@DPJHodges 2m2 minutes ago

    Hold the mayo. Source at the Copeland count now tells me Tory boxes held up by closure of A66. Now neck and neck.
    0 replies 1 retweet 1 like
  • Options
    MortimerMortimer Posts: 13,960

    *Note to self*

    I am crap at betting on by-elections.

    *End note to self*

    Yeh - me too, usually.

    That said, if the Tories perform (i.e. 2nd or 1st) in Stoke I might be breaking my By-election success duck tonight.....
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,578
    isam said:

    viewcode said:

    isam said:
    Postal vote sampling is illegal, isn't it? Or is that just before the polls close?
    I don't even know what it is.. but it cant mean a 1.12 fav can it?
    It is not illegal - although saying anything about it prior to close of poll certainly is - but it is almost impossible to do (given that papers are supposed to be verified face down) unless the verification is sloppily managed.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 59,022
    nunu said:

    (Dan Hodges)))Verified account‏@DPJHodges 2m2 minutes ago

    Hold the mayo. Source at the Copeland count now tells me Tory boxes held up by closure of A66. Now neck and neck.
    0 replies 1 retweet 1 like

    Ah, MI5 coming through for the Tories!
  • Options
    Danny565Danny565 Posts: 8,091
    Hahaha oh god, if those Stoke postal votes are accurate....
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,028
    edited February 2017
  • Options
    DanSmith said:

    *Note to self*

    I am crap at betting on by-elections.

    *End note to self*

    hold your nerve !
    That's my problem.
  • Options

    Popcorn!

    UKIP’s only MP dramatically conceded the Stoke by-election – saying the party’s new leader had lost to Labour. Douglas Carswell said it was “likely” Labour had held the seat just 45 minutes after the polls closed.

    UKIP’s Douglas Carswell shocked Question Time audiences when he claimed it was ‘likely’ Labour had held the Stoke seat It sparked an immediate bout of infighting, with claims he personally blocked a knighthood for Nigel Farage – which he denied. But it sets the stage for a fresh civil war today if the result is confirmed.


    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2943022/ukips-douglas-carswell-concedes-defeat-in-stoke-central-as-its-claimed-leader-paul-nuttall-could-finish-third/

    It takes a certain chutzpah, for a single member party to have a back bench rebellion.
    It takes a particular type of idiocy to think that the single MP of a minor party could '"personally block" a knighthood.
  • Options
    BojabobBojabob Posts: 642

    Mortimer said:

    The idea that Angela Rayner could ever be leader of a political party is simply laughable. She is just a bang a drum trade unionist, isn't she.


    CUTS CRISIS AHHHH TORIES.

    Yeah these oiks should clear off and leave it for the poshos with PPE.
    Current PM is neither, nor was the last lady PM......
    Yep, they did other degrees at Oxford. Such diversity is why places like Stoke and Copeland feel abandoned by Westminster. Politics is for Oxford grads, not the rest of us.
    Lectures from Lib Dems on diversity! Whitest, malest party in the Hoc!
    True. But as they only have nine MPs they have a small pool. What percentage of the PCP are women?
  • Options
    RoyalBlue said:

    *Note to self*

    I am crap at betting on by-elections.

    *End note to self*

    I thought you were going to bed :tongue:
    I know. Things got interesting.

    I seriously am going now!
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,949
    HYUFD said:
    Dan's making a fool of himself on Twitter again then?
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 28,046

    But at the same time there are a lot of people who for generations have voted Labour and that core vote is still there.

    Donkeys.

    If that's the case, there has been no sea change, and all the northern seats are probably safe for Labour for another generation.

    But at the same time there are a lot of people who for generations have voted Labour and that core vote is still there.

    Donkeys.

    If that's the case, there has been no sea change, and all the northern seats are probably safe for Labour for another generation.


    Are Tory voters in Surrey also donkeys? Just wondering.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @DPJHodges: Labour sources now back to saying they think Tories might just edge it. If Copeland had any chads, they'd be hanging...
  • Options
    YBarddCwscYBarddCwsc Posts: 7,172

    Mortimer said:

    The idea that Angela Rayner could ever be leader of a political party is simply laughable. She is just a bang a drum trade unionist, isn't she.


    CUTS CRISIS AHHHH TORIES.

    Yeah these oiks should clear off and leave it for the poshos with PPE.
    Current PM is neither, nor was the last lady PM......
    Yep, they did other degrees at Oxford. Such diversity is why places like Stoke and Copeland feel abandoned by Westminster. Politics is for Oxford grads, not the rest of us.
    Do you really think the LibDems are any better?

    Seriously, LibDem cabinet ministers in the coalition were Huhne (PPE, Oxford), Davey (PPE, Oxford), Alexander (PPE, Oxford), Clegg (Anthropology, Cambridge), Cable (Economics, Cambridge), Laws (Economics, Cambridge).

    No wonder the rest us think the LibDems can talk the talk, but they can't walk the walk.
  • Options
    Remember when some right old numpties where piling on a Tory victory in Stoke a few days ago.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,028

    DanSmith said:

    *Note to self*

    I am crap at betting on by-elections.

    *End note to self*

    hold your nerve !
    That's my problem.
    Or change your mind when it is cheap to do so :>
  • Options
    DanSmithDanSmith Posts: 1,215
    Scott_P said:

    @DPJHodges: Labour sources now back to saying they think Tories might just edge it. If Copeland had any chads, they'd be hanging...

    It's a shame we don't get live results like in the USA, we could probably call this already if we could.
  • Options
    Bojabob said:

    Mortimer said:

    The idea that Angela Rayner could ever be leader of a political party is simply laughable. She is just a bang a drum trade unionist, isn't she.


    CUTS CRISIS AHHHH TORIES.

    Yeah these oiks should clear off and leave it for the poshos with PPE.
    Current PM is neither, nor was the last lady PM......
    Yep, they did other degrees at Oxford. Such diversity is why places like Stoke and Copeland feel abandoned by Westminster. Politics is for Oxford grads, not the rest of us.
    Lectures from Lib Dems on diversity! Whitest, malest party in the Hoc!
    True. But as they only have nine MPs they have a small pool. What percentage of the PCP are women?
    When the Lib Dems had more than 50 MPS, how many of them were black or ethnic minority?
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 41,059
    Tory Copeland UKIP Stoke value at 17
  • Options
    Danny565Danny565 Posts: 8,091
    I might as well ask my cat what the count in Copeland is looking like rather than Dan Hodges.
  • Options
    viewcodeviewcode Posts: 19,160
    @isam, re postal vote sampling

    The election experts on here can explain it better than I can, but I think the theory goes like this:

    * Postal votes are sent in in an envelope.
    * Both the ballot paper and the envelope have a number on them
    * To verify it's a valid vote, the ballot paper is removed from the envelope and the numbers are compared
    * This takes place before the polls close (is that still the case?)
    * The party election agents are allowed to witness this process and they make guesstimates.
    * They are not allowed to discuss this (before the poll closes)
    * It's a good forward indicator of the election result, and correctly predicted ScotInd14 and EUREF16.

    If any of the above is inaccurate, somebody on here will say
  • Options
    BojabobBojabob Posts: 642
    kle4 said:

    Last note, but if Labour do contrive to lose either of these seats, are there any MPs left in Lab who have not either already resigned from or refuse to serve in the shadow cabinet to take the place of any further resignations?

    Good question. Corbyn will simply hire several who have already resigned, whether or not they actually agree to be in the Shadow Cabinet, doesn't matter.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,578
    NeilVW said:

    isam said:
    Isn't postal vote turnout usually higher than on-the-day turnout?
    Yes, although as postal voting becomes more common, and as people are 'encouraged' to sign up by party activists despite not really wanting one, and as people who want one for a particular one-off reason (or one type of election) sign themselves up indefinitely for all elections, the differential in turnout is narrowing. I can remember when PV turnout was close to 90%, nowadays it is often nearer to 70%, and I would guess Stoke is lower still even in a GE.
  • Options
    TudorRoseTudorRose Posts: 1,662
    DanSmith said:

    Scott_P said:

    @DPJHodges: Labour sources now back to saying they think Tories might just edge it. If Copeland had any chads, they'd be hanging...

    It's a shame we don't get live results like in the USA, we could probably call this already if we could.
    Has California declared yet?!
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 59,022
    TudorRose said:

    DanSmith said:

    Scott_P said:

    @DPJHodges: Labour sources now back to saying they think Tories might just edge it. If Copeland had any chads, they'd be hanging...

    It's a shame we don't get live results like in the USA, we could probably call this already if we could.
    Has California declared yet?!
    LOL :smiley:
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,949
    Danny565 said:

    I might as well ask my cat what the count in Copeland is looking like rather than Dan Hodges.

    Even Plato's pussy knows more than Dan Hodges...
  • Options

    Popcorn!

    UKIP’s only MP dramatically conceded the Stoke by-election – saying the party’s new leader had lost to Labour. Douglas Carswell said it was “likely” Labour had held the seat just 45 minutes after the polls closed.

    UKIP’s Douglas Carswell shocked Question Time audiences when he claimed it was ‘likely’ Labour had held the Stoke seat It sparked an immediate bout of infighting, with claims he personally blocked a knighthood for Nigel Farage – which he denied. But it sets the stage for a fresh civil war today if the result is confirmed.


    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2943022/ukips-douglas-carswell-concedes-defeat-in-stoke-central-as-its-claimed-leader-paul-nuttall-could-finish-third/

    It takes a certain chutzpah, for a single member party to have a back bench rebellion.
    It takes a particular type of idiocy to think that the single MP of a minor party could '"personally block" a knighthood.
    Actually it is possible.

    A letter from an MP/Peer can delay/block an honour.

    They can explain why or if a further investigation is needed before awarding an honour.
  • Options
    RobD said:

    nunu said:

    (Dan Hodges)))Verified account‏@DPJHodges 2m2 minutes ago

    Hold the mayo. Source at the Copeland count now tells me Tory boxes held up by closure of A66. Now neck and neck.
    0 replies 1 retweet 1 like

    Ah, MI5 coming through for the Tories!
    You know that's going to be quoted in the press if Labour lose, don't you?
This discussion has been closed.