A comment earlier saying Corbyn has been able to carry on due to good electoral results....
Well yes and no - fine By-elections have been alright, London Mayoral election good result.
But lets look at 3 other elections
Scottish Parliament Election 2016 - came third, worst performance in Scottish parliament since creation in 1999, lost 1/3 of seats, most seats any party have ever lost in one election. First time not finishing either 1st or 2nd in a Scottish election (Scottish Parliament or UK general election) for generations.
Welsh Parliament Election 2016 - lost 7.6% of vote, second largest fall in vote in Welsh Parliament history.
Local Elections 2016 - Labour vote share fell by 4.3%, largest vote share fall of any party in 2016.
Is it socially acceptable for someone to want Labour to lose in Stoke simply because Jack Dromey is their Campaign Manager? (I'm asking for a friend...)
Think turnout will be the biggest story of the night
If the Tories win Copeland it most certainly will not, 30% for a by election in an industrial Labour seat is par for the course, especially in this weather
Expectation management from LD / Tim Farron letter to the faithful at 10.01pm:
"We always knew that both of these by-elections would be tough; in Stoke we started from 5th place and in both Copeland and Stoke we lost our deposit in 2015. The Conservatives, Labour and UKIP have all thrown the kitchen sink at these by-elections."
If the Conservatives do gain Copeland will that have any effect of Labour's 'NHSNHSNHSNHSNHS' strategy ?
Perhaps they could change to a 'BHSBHSBHSBHSBHS' strategy of 'fairness'.
Labour will never cease to bang on about the NHS. After all, polling evidence suggests that Labour is (more or less) consistently trusted over the Tories on only two important policy areas - the NHS and housing - and the latter is primarily of interest to younger and poorer voters with disproportionately low turnout rates.
If they only have one good card left then they are bound to play it every time.
The market seems extremely confident Labour will hold Stoke. More so than the Tories gaining Copeland.
Seems sensible. The former being wrong requires a labour collapse in a heartland, the latter doing merely poorly. Albeit historically poorly, but still nowhere near ther drop needed in Stoke, with a split on who could benefit.
Think turnout will be the biggest story of the night
If the Tories win Copeland it most certainly will not, 30% for a by election in an industrial Labour seat is par for the course, especially in this weather
Good point. A quick search reveals the lowest turnout for a Parliamentary by-election in modern history was 18.2% (Manchester Central, 2012.)
Think turnout will be the biggest story of the night
If the Tories win Copeland it most certainly will not, 30% for a by election in an industrial Labour seat is par for the course, especially in this weather
Good point. A quick search reveals the lowest turnout for a Parliamentary by-election in modern history was 18.2% (Manchester Central, 2012.)
Is it socially acceptable for someone to want Labour to lose in Stoke simply because Jack Dromey is their Campaign Manager? (I'm asking for a friend...)
And "Throwing the kitchen sink" will be the biggest cliche of the night!
Indeed - at least make it the bathroom sink. More likely to be heavier and sturdier, has further to fall so even more force behind it, and since people go for the kitchen sink first, throwing the bathroom sink is even more appropriate as a sign of the extent of effort.
@benrileysmith: Corbyn backers planning "day of reckoning" tomorrow against Labour moderates if they lose by-election, reports Newsnight.
If he loses either by-election, it would be about damn time some of them admitted the party either needs to come to its senses, and if the members won't, then that they are in the wron party.
Think turnout will be the biggest story of the night
If the Tories win Copeland it most certainly will not, 30% for a by election in an industrial Labour seat is par for the course, especially in this weather
Good point. A quick search reveals the lowest turnout for a Parliamentary by-election in modern history was 18.2% (Manchester Central, 2012.)
Fair point. But don't think Tories will take Copeland. Will be the NHS wot won it for Labour...
HM Opposition start two mid term by-elections with a 7% and a 17% lead in seats they are defending. We really should be discussing the growth of their majorities. Anything else is an indictment.
Think turnout will be the biggest story of the night
If the Tories win Copeland it most certainly will not, 30% for a by election in an industrial Labour seat is par for the course, especially in this weather
Good point. A quick search reveals the lowest turnout for a Parliamentary by-election in modern history was 18.2% (Manchester Central, 2012.)
Fair point. But don't think Tories will take Copeland. Will be the NHS wot won it for Labour...
Quote from a resident this morning in Copeland "there's more to life than the NHS. That's all they go on about. There's loads of things in Whitehaven that need attention". But they did castigate us for not even acknowledging that the NHS is an issue of concern for residents.
And "Throwing the kitchen sink" will be the biggest cliche of the night!
Indeed - at least make it the bathroom sink. More likely to be heavier and sturdier, has further to fall so even more force behind it, and since people go for the kitchen sink first, throwing the bathroom sink is even more appropriate as a sign of the extent of effort.
Bathroom sink also has the advantage of a more middle-class ring to it...
Comments
Goodness.
Well yes and no - fine By-elections have been alright, London Mayoral election good result.
But lets look at 3 other elections
Scottish Parliament Election 2016 - came third, worst performance in Scottish parliament since creation in 1999, lost 1/3 of seats, most seats any party have ever lost in one election. First time not finishing either 1st or 2nd in a Scottish election (Scottish Parliament or UK general election) for generations.
Welsh Parliament Election 2016 - lost 7.6% of vote, second largest fall in vote in Welsh Parliament history.
Local Elections 2016 - Labour vote share fell by 4.3%, largest vote share fall of any party in 2016.
Doesn't look too good to me....
Perhaps they could change to a 'BHSBHSBHSBHSBHS' strategy of 'fairness'.
I laid 1.15 the new low!
"We always knew that both of these by-elections would be tough; in Stoke we started from 5th place and in both Copeland and Stoke we lost our deposit in 2015. The Conservatives, Labour and UKIP have all thrown the kitchen sink at these by-elections."
Fairly low base then...
If they only have one good card left then they are bound to play it every time.
Beth RigbyVerified account@BethRigby 2m2 minutes ago
Interesting...Tory tells me party needed stronger message on #NHS in #Copeland. Services matter in remote areas. His prediction? Labour hold
Hmmm seemed to just be a blip, back to 75% now
IIRC
Labour 6500
Tory 5000
UKIP 4000
Others 1500
Sadly, we may be disappointed.
LD 644
Con 337
UKIP 106
Green 42
Tory 4,000
Ukip 4,000...
Lib Dem 4,001 ?! ;-))
Barton (Kettering) result:
LDEM: 57.0% (+57.0)
CON: 29.8% (-19.3)
UKIP: 9.4% (-14.1)
GRN: 3.7% (-3.5)
No Labour unlike previous.
Anything less is a serious problem. Both defeats would be a catastrophe.
It's a big night.