Just woke up and this reminds me very much of Paddy Ashdown's comment on the 2010 UK election - the people have spoken, but we've no idea what they said.
Just woke up and this reminds me very much of Paddy Ashdown's comment on the 2010 UK election - the people have spoken, but we've no idea what they said.
I think he stole that from Bill Clinton talking about Florida, dunno who Bill got it from...
I still think Biden is value and it’s very much 50/50 at this. He needs, essentially, 2 of GA, MI, WI, PA and NC.
Let’s put NC in the Trump column immediately because it’s very very likely he will get a narrow win there.
The other states are harder to read:
GA - looks like it will be a nail biter. There are enough votes out there for Biden to take the victory, but it is going to be very very close.
PA - there are a lot of people suggesting the mail in ballots are going to bridge the gap. I think that looks a wee bit optimistic given the current Trump tally, but let’s charitably say this is a 60/40 percent chance for Trump.
MI - genuinely up in the air from my reading of the situation.
WI - again there is that gap that looks pretty sizeable but Milwaukee has yet to report and is expected to be very sizeable Dem. I think you give the edge to Biden here.
All in all, it’s on a knife edge but I could see Biden doing it. His team appear to be projecting confidence while Trump’s look defensive, if that is any reading of the situation, but it’s difficult to know if that’s from a reading of the campaign team’s view of the situation or whether it’s just projection.
Just woke up and this reminds me very much of Paddy Ashdown's comment on the 2010 UK election - the people have spoken, but we've no idea what they said.
I think he stole that from Bill Clinton talking about Florida, dunno who Bill got it from...
Morning all. Well that's the last time I pay attention to US polls. File under "for entertainment only" I think.
I must admit, the numbers coming out of AP don't look great for Biden. We will see.
Shout out to @Barnesian and the rest of the Zoom crew. Some really useful analysis, a very educational experience all round. Certainly better punditry than CNN!
I still think Biden is value and it’s very much 50/50 at this. He needs, essentially, 2 of GA, MI, WI, PA and NC.
Let’s put NC in the Trump column immediately because it’s very very likely he will get a narrow win there.
The other states are harder to read:
GA - looks like it will be a nail biter. There are enough votes out there for Biden to take the victory, but it is going to be very very close.
PA - there are a lot of people suggesting the mail in ballots are going to bridge the gap. I think that looks a wee bit optimistic given the current Trump tally, but let’s charitably say this is a 60/40 percent chance for Trump.
MI - genuinely up in the air from my reading of the situation.
WI - again there is that gap that looks pretty sizeable but Milwaukee has yet to report and is expected to be very sizeable Dem. I think you give the edge to Biden here.
All in all, it’s on a knife edge but I could see Biden doing it. His team appear to be projecting confidence while Trump’s look defensive, if that is any reading of the situation, but it’s difficult to know if that’s from a reading of the campaign team’s view of the situation or whether it’s just projection.
There is another issue about trying to decide if the gap can be closed. There is an assumption that if it's Dem areas to come then it's good for Biden, if it's Rep areas to come it's good for Trump.
But if it's just Mail-in ballots to come, then it doesn't matter if it's a Rep or Dem area. Both are likely to close the gap for Biden.
Also - beware of the "% vote reported" stat. I don't think this is anything other than an estimate. It's not like the UK where the first thing they do is count the number of ballot papers and you know the numbers of votes cast, before you know how they were cast.
If all the votes that came in on or before the day in WI, Mi and PA are carefully and properly counted, and Biden win only 2 of them, I don’t understand on what basis it goes into any court. It would be pretty solidly legit. And for Biden to win all three it would be comprehensive win. So I don’t understand the betting markets, what are they waiting for?
Also the amount of Dem votes in Georgia puts them in with at least 50/50 shout for the senate too?
I still think Biden is value and it’s very much 50/50 at this. He needs, essentially, 2 of GA, MI, WI, PA and NC.
Let’s put NC in the Trump column immediately because it’s very very likely he will get a narrow win there.
The other states are harder to read:
GA - looks like it will be a nail biter. There are enough votes out there for Biden to take the victory, but it is going to be very very close.
PA - there are a lot of people suggesting the mail in ballots are going to bridge the gap. I think that looks a wee bit optimistic given the current Trump tally, but let’s charitably say this is a 60/40 percent chance for Trump.
MI - genuinely up in the air from my reading of the situation.
WI - again there is that gap that looks pretty sizeable but Milwaukee has yet to report and is expected to be very sizeable Dem. I think you give the edge to Biden here.
All in all, it’s on a knife edge but I could see Biden doing it. His team appear to be projecting confidence while Trump’s look defensive, if that is any reading of the situation, but it’s difficult to know if that’s from a reading of the campaign team’s view of the situation or whether it’s just projection.
Trump's team have just issued three lawsuits in Pennsylvania. Maybe its a belt-and-braces approach but do you really think they would have done that if they did not hold some doubt as to the outcome of the race?
Trafalgar must have done pretty well as far as pollsters are concerned.
What is the next event that people can smugly take the mickey out of @HYUFD over his predictions, before he’s right and they’re wrong?
The acid test will come when the non-conservative wins. If HY successfully predicts that, he will deserve kudos.
I proposed Herdson points for successfully predicting the 2017 outlier in the other direction. Outside two large English-speaking countries, there have been a lot of results like J Trudeau I and arguably J Trudeau II which could also contribute to points.
Do we now have the prospect of weeks of postals being scrutinised and validated? Multiple votes by the same voter, fictitious voters, illegals registered as voters, dead voters....
If there is found to be a degree of fraud within there, intended to favour the Democrats, then that will really hurt them. They will be seen as trying to steal an election. The justification of "But it's to stop Trump!" will not play well.
Reminds of the saying "Never argue with an idiot". They drag you down to their level - and then win with experience.
I still think Biden is value and it’s very much 50/50 at this. He needs, essentially, 2 of GA, MI, WI, PA and NC.
Let’s put NC in the Trump column immediately because it’s very very likely he will get a narrow win there.
The other states are harder to read:
GA - looks like it will be a nail biter. There are enough votes out there for Biden to take the victory, but it is going to be very very close.
PA - there are a lot of people suggesting the mail in ballots are going to bridge the gap. I think that looks a wee bit optimistic given the current Trump tally, but let’s charitably say this is a 60/40 percent chance for Trump.
MI - genuinely up in the air from my reading of the situation.
WI - again there is that gap that looks pretty sizeable but Milwaukee has yet to report and is expected to be very sizeable Dem. I think you give the edge to Biden here.
All in all, it’s on a knife edge but I could see Biden doing it. His team appear to be projecting confidence while Trump’s look defensive, if that is any reading of the situation, but it’s difficult to know if that’s from a reading of the campaign team’s view of the situation or whether it’s just projection.
Very crudely - I have put all the nytimes county results into a spreadsheet, then assumed the unreported votes go as their counties have currently gone. That doesn't include absentee ballots (I think).
I thought when doing this I would see that Biden has lots of votes to come in. But actually it doesn't look that way. It looks like the gap widens in all 3 states? Maybe i've miscalculated somehow...
Clearly a significant proportion of Americans don't want to live in a democracy. They want a monarchy - peopled by reality TV stars.
Jefferson and co must be turning in their graves. I suppose you can say their experiment worked for a couple of hundred years.
Andrew Jackson approves of this message. Telling the supreme court to pound sand - when the supreme court ruled that he couldn't just ignore a treaty signed in the name of the US - was very Trumpian....
Davy Crockett also says hi - the reality TV star, before reality TV....
Do we now have the prospect of weeks of postals being scrutinised and validated? Multiple votes by the same voter, fictitious voters, illegals registered as voters, dead voters....
If there is found to be a degree of fraud within there, intended to favour the Democrats, then that will really hurt them. They will be seen as trying to steal an election. The justification of "But it's to stop Trump!" will not play well.
Reminds of the saying "Never argue with an idiot". They drag you down to their level - and then win with experience.
The GOP will try and go to court ASAP to cause this, but it looks like the remaining votes will be counted (at least the first time) within the next 48 hours and mostly within the next 12.
"Here’s a look at what we know about the outstanding vote in each battleground state:
Arizona: While some outlets, such as the Associated Press, have projected Arizona for Biden, ABC News has not. Before the election, officials did warn that any super-close races might not be resolved until the last votes are counted on Thursday or Friday. However, the race isn’t that close right now (Biden 52 percent, Trump 47 percent), so we might see a projection sooner.
Wisconsin: 81 percent of the expected vote is already reporting here, and the rest should trickle in over the next few hours. Earlier tonight, Milwaukee County (expected to be among the last places to finish counting) said to expect semi-final results around 6 a.m. Eastern.
Georgia: The big holdup here is Fulton County, which as of 2 a.m. was home to most of the outstanding ballots. The count there was delayed by a burst pipe (no ballots were damaged), and election officials told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution their goal was to go into Wednesday with just 20,000 ballots left to count. However, the secretary of state estimated those results would not be released until the afternoon.
Michigan: There are still hundreds of thousands of absentee ballots to be counted here, and it’s unclear if counting will continue throughout the night. Election officials did say earlier on Tuesday that they expected counting to wrap up by Wednesday night.
Pennsylvania: Major counties such as Philadelphia and Allegheny have reported their last ballots of the night (although Philadelphia will continue to count around the clock). Going into the election, many county and state election officials predicted that results wouldn’t approach completion until Friday.
North Carolina: 95 percent of the expected vote has already been counted here, so it seems quite possible that all we’re waiting on are late-arriving mail-in ballots, which have until Nov. 12 to arrive. That means we could be waiting over a week for a call here.
Maine: Honestly, this is anyone’s guess. Election officials are taking much longer here than they originally expected."
I already have. I think I may do some gardening - or rather cutting back of overgrown stuff - before heading back up North.
I take no pleasure in saying this but I did say that I was not convinced by all this talk of Biden landslides and that I feared there were more shy Trump voters than people were allowing for. Anyway, let's see.
One thing we can all agree on: the USA badly needs an Electoral Commission and some clear rules on postal voting and vote counting. The way they do it is all a mess.
Talking of which the role of Chair of the Electoral Commission over here is being advertised, for anyone interested.
Just a thought about the polls. How do the pollsters determine the demographic makeup of a state when coming up with their weightings? Are they at the worst point now because the annual census was 10 years ago, and every year that passes from that changes things and increases the amount of educated guesswork.
Thanks Barnesian and OGH for organising the Zoom last night, was enjoyable to catch up with the PBers who joined and go over the results together in one of the closest presidential elections in US history
Clearly a significant proportion of Americans don't want to live in a democracy. They want a monarchy - peopled by reality TV stars.
Jefferson and co must be turning in their graves. I suppose you can say their experiment worked for a couple of hundred years.
Nah, we can't explain this away like that.
If Trump wins it's because Americans thought he'd make the better President for them. We need to understand why, and not grab fig leaves.
Fat chance of that happening, don’t you remember Brexit? The bubble are trapped in a world where opinion polling & progressive theories are ring fenced, non negotiables
I already have. I think I may do some gardening - or rather cutting back of overgrown stuff - before heading back up North.
I take no pleasure in saying this but I did say that I was not convinced by all this talk of Biden landslides and that I feared there were more shy Trump voters than people were allowing for. Anyway, let's see.
One thing we can all agree on: the USA badly needs an Electoral Commission and some clear rules on postal voting and vote counting. The way they do it is all a mess.
Talking of which the role of Chair of the Electoral Commission over here is being advertised, for anyone interested.
The words "poisoned" and "chalice" just don't seem adequate.
Trafalgar must have done pretty well as far as pollsters are concerned.
What is the next event that people can smugly take the mickey out of @HYUFD over his predictions, before he’s right and they’re wrong?
The acid test will come when the non-conservative wins. If HY successfully predicts that, he will deserve kudos.
Maybe Tralfagar’s way of coming to their conclusions is better than traditional opinion polling
For sure. It is possible that HY is a shrewd judge of evidence and selected that, based on his experience, instinct and judgement, that he felt provided the best pointer of how things might go. And didn't bother to worry PB readers about the why and wherefore.
However it's also possible that he tipped the conservative to win because he always tips the conservative and wants the conservative to win, and simply dredges up whatever data he can find to support a preconceived outcome.
In the latter case, the surprise isn't HY's forecast, but the conservative win (if indeed that transpires).
As I said a few days back, if you always cheer for Arsenal, and Arsenal wins, you're a fan, not a pundit.
Clearly a significant proportion of Americans don't want to live in a democracy. They want a monarchy - peopled by reality TV stars.
Jefferson and co must be turning in their graves. I suppose you can say their experiment worked for a couple of hundred years.
Nah, we can't explain this away like that.
If Trump wins it's because Americans thought he'd make the better President for them. We need to understand why, and not grab fig leaves.
However Trump even if he wins the EC will become the first re elected US President never to have won the national popular vote, a majority of Americans will never have voted for Trump
"Here’s a look at what we know about the outstanding vote in each battleground state:
Arizona: While some outlets, such as the Associated Press, have projected Arizona for Biden, ABC News has not. Before the election, officials did warn that any super-close races might not be resolved until the last votes are counted on Thursday or Friday. However, the race isn’t that close right now (Biden 52 percent, Trump 47 percent), so we might see a projection sooner.
Wisconsin: 81 percent of the expected vote is already reporting here, and the rest should trickle in over the next few hours. Earlier tonight, Milwaukee County (expected to be among the last places to finish counting) said to expect semi-final results around 6 a.m. Eastern.
Georgia: The big holdup here is Fulton County, which as of 2 a.m. was home to most of the outstanding ballots. The count there was delayed by a burst pipe (no ballots were damaged), and election officials told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution their goal was to go into Wednesday with just 20,000 ballots left to count. However, the secretary of state estimated those results would not be released until the afternoon.
Michigan: There are still hundreds of thousands of absentee ballots to be counted here, and it’s unclear if counting will continue throughout the night. Election officials did say earlier on Tuesday that they expected counting to wrap up by Wednesday night.
Pennsylvania: Major counties such as Philadelphia and Allegheny have reported their last ballots of the night (although Philadelphia will continue to count around the clock). Going into the election, many county and state election officials predicted that results wouldn’t approach completion until Friday.
North Carolina: 95 percent of the expected vote has already been counted here, so it seems quite possible that all we’re waiting on are late-arriving mail-in ballots, which have until Nov. 12 to arrive. That means we could be waiting over a week for a call here.
Maine: Honestly, this is anyone’s guess. Election officials are taking much longer here than they originally expected."
Trafalgar must have done pretty well as far as pollsters are concerned.
What is the next event that people can smugly take the mickey out of @HYUFD over his predictions, before he’s right and they’re wrong?
The acid test will come when the non-conservative wins. If HY successfully predicts that, he will deserve kudos.
I did say Trudeau would win re election last year which was not guaranteed and he was the leading non-conservative in Canada so I do not always predict the conservative will win
I still think Biden is value and it’s very much 50/50 at this. He needs, essentially, 2 of GA, MI, WI, PA and NC.
Let’s put NC in the Trump column immediately because it’s very very likely he will get a narrow win there.
The other states are harder to read:
GA - looks like it will be a nail biter. There are enough votes out there for Biden to take the victory, but it is going to be very very close.
PA - there are a lot of people suggesting the mail in ballots are going to bridge the gap. I think that looks a wee bit optimistic given the current Trump tally, but let’s charitably say this is a 60/40 percent chance for Trump.
MI - genuinely up in the air from my reading of the situation.
WI - again there is that gap that looks pretty sizeable but Milwaukee has yet to report and is expected to be very sizeable Dem. I think you give the edge to Biden here.
All in all, it’s on a knife edge but I could see Biden doing it. His team appear to be projecting confidence while Trump’s look defensive, if that is any reading of the situation, but it’s difficult to know if that’s from a reading of the campaign team’s view of the situation or whether it’s just projection.
Very crudely - I have put all the nytimes county results into a spreadsheet, then assumed the unreported votes go as their counties have currently gone. That doesn't include absentee ballots (I think).
I thought when doing this I would see that Biden has lots of votes to come in. But actually it doesn't look that way. It looks like the gap widens in all 3 states? Maybe i've miscalculated somehow...
Have you assumed that all votes to come mirror the votes cast so far? Whereas actually heavily Republican districts could have significant Biden votes outstanding, because Mail in.
It's not like a normal election where mail in ballots are a small proportion, and the outstanding votes are cast on the same basis as those already counted. So you can just work it out by whether areas to come are strong Dem or strong Republican.
Not a great night financially, about £400-500 in the red depending on how the spreads work out. My worst PB election night.
I hope Biden scrapes it, looking at that gurning orange oaf for another four years is not going to be pleasant, but could be worse, at least I am not American. It would be good if he would have to deal with some of his own mess, but I expect he will just run up the deficit and leave the bill for the next POTUS.
Clearly a significant proportion of Americans don't want to live in a democracy. They want a monarchy - peopled by reality TV stars.
Jefferson and co must be turning in their graves. I suppose you can say their experiment worked for a couple of hundred years.
Nah, we can't explain this away like that.
If Trump wins it's because Americans thought he'd make the better President for them. We need to understand why, and not grab fig leaves.
However Trump even if he wins the EC will become the first re elected US President never to have won the national popular vote, a majority of Americans will never have voted for Trump
YOu have to wonder, whoever wins this, its unlikely the other side will ever accept the result.
"Here’s a look at what we know about the outstanding vote in each battleground state:
Arizona: While some outlets, such as the Associated Press, have projected Arizona for Biden, ABC News has not. Before the election, officials did warn that any super-close races might not be resolved until the last votes are counted on Thursday or Friday. However, the race isn’t that close right now (Biden 52 percent, Trump 47 percent), so we might see a projection sooner.
Wisconsin: 81 percent of the expected vote is already reporting here, and the rest should trickle in over the next few hours. Earlier tonight, Milwaukee County (expected to be among the last places to finish counting) said to expect semi-final results around 6 a.m. Eastern.
Georgia: The big holdup here is Fulton County, which as of 2 a.m. was home to most of the outstanding ballots. The count there was delayed by a burst pipe (no ballots were damaged), and election officials told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution their goal was to go into Wednesday with just 20,000 ballots left to count. However, the secretary of state estimated those results would not be released until the afternoon.
Michigan: There are still hundreds of thousands of absentee ballots to be counted here, and it’s unclear if counting will continue throughout the night. Election officials did say earlier on Tuesday that they expected counting to wrap up by Wednesday night.
Pennsylvania: Major counties such as Philadelphia and Allegheny have reported their last ballots of the night (although Philadelphia will continue to count around the clock). Going into the election, many county and state election officials predicted that results wouldn’t approach completion until Friday.
North Carolina: 95 percent of the expected vote has already been counted here, so it seems quite possible that all we’re waiting on are late-arriving mail-in ballots, which have until Nov. 12 to arrive. That means we could be waiting over a week for a call here.
Maine: Honestly, this is anyone’s guess. Election officials are taking much longer here than they originally expected."
Clearly a significant proportion of Americans don't want to live in a democracy. They want a monarchy - peopled by reality TV stars.
Jefferson and co must be turning in their graves. I suppose you can say their experiment worked for a couple of hundred years.
Andrew Jackson approves of this message. Telling the supreme court to pound sand - when the supreme court ruled that he couldn't just ignore a treaty signed in the name of the US - was very Trumpian....
Davy Crockett also says hi - the reality TV star, before reality TV....
Reality stage star. Which he then had to live up to, by adopting the same hat.
Back to the election - the promised red mirage is clearing and we have a new president. Just. Phew.
"Here’s a look at what we know about the outstanding vote in each battleground state:
Arizona: While some outlets, such as the Associated Press, have projected Arizona for Biden, ABC News has not. Before the election, officials did warn that any super-close races might not be resolved until the last votes are counted on Thursday or Friday. However, the race isn’t that close right now (Biden 52 percent, Trump 47 percent), so we might see a projection sooner.
Wisconsin: 81 percent of the expected vote is already reporting here, and the rest should trickle in over the next few hours. Earlier tonight, Milwaukee County (expected to be among the last places to finish counting) said to expect semi-final results around 6 a.m. Eastern.
Georgia: The big holdup here is Fulton County, which as of 2 a.m. was home to most of the outstanding ballots. The count there was delayed by a burst pipe (no ballots were damaged), and election officials told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution their goal was to go into Wednesday with just 20,000 ballots left to count. However, the secretary of state estimated those results would not be released until the afternoon.
Michigan: There are still hundreds of thousands of absentee ballots to be counted here, and it’s unclear if counting will continue throughout the night. Election officials did say earlier on Tuesday that they expected counting to wrap up by Wednesday night.
Pennsylvania: Major counties such as Philadelphia and Allegheny have reported their last ballots of the night (although Philadelphia will continue to count around the clock). Going into the election, many county and state election officials predicted that results wouldn’t approach completion until Friday.
North Carolina: 95 percent of the expected vote has already been counted here, so it seems quite possible that all we’re waiting on are late-arriving mail-in ballots, which have until Nov. 12 to arrive. That means we could be waiting over a week for a call here.
Maine: Honestly, this is anyone’s guess. Election officials are taking much longer here than they originally expected."
The passage in bold seems unfathomable to me. Don't like the outcome? Get licking envelopes.
Trafalgar must have done pretty well as far as pollsters are concerned.
What is the next event that people can smugly take the mickey out of @HYUFD over his predictions, before he’s right and they’re wrong?
The acid test will come when the non-conservative wins. If HY successfully predicts that, he will deserve kudos.
Maybe Tralfagar’s way of coming to their conclusions is better than traditional opinion polling
For sure. It is possible that HY is a shrewd judge of evidence and selected that, based on his experience, instinct and judgement, that he felt provided the best pointer of how things might go. And didn't bother to worry PB readers about the why and wherefore.
However it's also possible that he tipped the conservative to win because he always tips the conservative and wants the conservative to win, and simply dredges up whatever data he can find to support a preconceived outcome.
In the latter case, the surprise isn't HY's forecast, but the conservative win (if indeed that transpires).
As I said a few days back, if you always cheer for Arsenal, and Arsenal wins, you're a fan, not a pundit.
I guess the same goes for those lefties who wrote the threads that tipped Remain, said to lay Boris for the leadership, and backed Clinton and Biden?
Biden might still win of course. He’s only the same price now as Trump was 24 hours ago
I still think Biden is value and it’s very much 50/50 at this. He needs, essentially, 2 of GA, MI, WI, PA and NC.
Let’s put NC in the Trump column immediately because it’s very very likely he will get a narrow win there.
The other states are harder to read:
GA - looks like it will be a nail biter. There are enough votes out there for Biden to take the victory, but it is going to be very very close.
PA - there are a lot of people suggesting the mail in ballots are going to bridge the gap. I think that looks a wee bit optimistic given the current Trump tally, but let’s charitably say this is a 60/40 percent chance for Trump.
MI - genuinely up in the air from my reading of the situation.
WI - again there is that gap that looks pretty sizeable but Milwaukee has yet to report and is expected to be very sizeable Dem. I think you give the edge to Biden here.
All in all, it’s on a knife edge but I could see Biden doing it. His team appear to be projecting confidence while Trump’s look defensive, if that is any reading of the situation, but it’s difficult to know if that’s from a reading of the campaign team’s view of the situation or whether it’s just projection.
Isn’t there a route via Nevada where he picks up GA and WI and gets exactly 270?
Trafalgar must have done pretty well as far as pollsters are concerned.
What is the next event that people can smugly take the mickey out of @HYUFD over his predictions, before he’s right and they’re wrong?
The acid test will come when the non-conservative wins. If HY successfully predicts that, he will deserve kudos.
Maybe Tralfagar’s way of coming to their conclusions is better than traditional opinion polling
For sure. It is possible that HY is a shrewd judge of evidence and selected that, based on his experience, instinct and judgement, that he felt provided the best pointer of how things might go. And didn't bother to worry PB readers about the why and wherefore.
However it's also possible that he tipped the conservative to win because he always tips the conservative and wants the conservative to win, and simply dredges up whatever data he can find to support a preconceived outcome.
In the latter case, the surprise isn't HY's forecast, but the conservative win (if indeed that transpires).
As I said a few days back, if you always cheer for Arsenal, and Arsenal wins, you're a fan, not a pundit.
I guess the same goes for those lefties who wrote the threads that tipped Remain, said to lay Boris for the leadership, and backed Clinton and Biden?
Biden might still win of course. He’s only the same price now as Trump was 24 hours ago
Absolutely. It's just sad that we don't win quite so often.
Trafalgar must have done pretty well as far as pollsters are concerned.
The stopped clock may be right again. They predicted Trump to win Minnesota; Biden won it by 8!
Yeah, you just ignore the one's that don't fit the narrative.
"When polls show a right winger winning they are robust rigorous and scientific. When the show someone even vaguely left of that who doesn't align with my beliefs then they are wishywashy nonsense that can't be trusted"
Trafalgar must have done pretty well as far as pollsters are concerned.
What is the next event that people can smugly take the mickey out of @HYUFD over his predictions, before he’s right and they’re wrong?
The acid test will come when the non-conservative wins. If HY successfully predicts that, he will deserve kudos.
Maybe Tralfagar’s way of coming to their conclusions is better than traditional opinion polling
For sure. It is possible that HY is a shrewd judge of evidence and selected that, based on his experience, instinct and judgement, that he felt provided the best pointer of how things might go. And didn't bother to worry PB readers about the why and wherefore.
However it's also possible that he tipped the conservative to win because he always tips the conservative and wants the conservative to win, and simply dredges up whatever data he can find to support a preconceived outcome.
In the latter case, the surprise isn't HY's forecast, but the conservative win (if indeed that transpires).
As I said a few days back, if you always cheer for Arsenal, and Arsenal wins, you're a fan, not a pundit.
I guess the same goes for those lefties who wrote the threads that tipped Remain, said to lay Boris for the leadership, and backed Clinton and Biden?
Biden might still win of course. He’s only the same price now as Trump was 24 hours ago
That is not correct though is it (well it maybe for some)? It generally was because the evidence pointed to those results. If there is any criticism is not they were biased by their own bias but that they believed crap evidence. Should they have been aware the evidence was likely to have been crap or not?
I still think Biden is value and it’s very much 50/50 at this. He needs, essentially, 2 of GA, MI, WI, PA and NC.
Let’s put NC in the Trump column immediately because it’s very very likely he will get a narrow win there.
The other states are harder to read:
GA - looks like it will be a nail biter. There are enough votes out there for Biden to take the victory, but it is going to be very very close.
PA - there are a lot of people suggesting the mail in ballots are going to bridge the gap. I think that looks a wee bit optimistic given the current Trump tally, but let’s charitably say this is a 60/40 percent chance for Trump.
MI - genuinely up in the air from my reading of the situation.
WI - again there is that gap that looks pretty sizeable but Milwaukee has yet to report and is expected to be very sizeable Dem. I think you give the edge to Biden here.
All in all, it’s on a knife edge but I could see Biden doing it. His team appear to be projecting confidence while Trump’s look defensive, if that is any reading of the situation, but it’s difficult to know if that’s from a reading of the campaign team’s view of the situation or whether it’s just projection.
Very crudely - I have put all the nytimes county results into a spreadsheet, then assumed the unreported votes go as their counties have currently gone. That doesn't include absentee ballots (I think).
I thought when doing this I would see that Biden has lots of votes to come in. But actually it doesn't look that way. It looks like the gap widens in all 3 states? Maybe i've miscalculated somehow...
Have you assumed that all votes to come mirror the votes cast so far? Whereas actually heavily Republican districts could have significant Biden votes outstanding, because Mail in.
It's not like a normal election where mail in ballots are a small proportion, and the outstanding votes are cast on the same basis as those already counted. So you can just work it out by whether areas to come are strong Dem or strong Republican.
Yes - that's what I've done. Thanks for giving me hope.
I still think Biden is value and it’s very much 50/50 at this. He needs, essentially, 2 of GA, MI, WI, PA and NC.
Let’s put NC in the Trump column immediately because it’s very very likely he will get a narrow win there.
The other states are harder to read:
GA - looks like it will be a nail biter. There are enough votes out there for Biden to take the victory, but it is going to be very very close.
PA - there are a lot of people suggesting the mail in ballots are going to bridge the gap. I think that looks a wee bit optimistic given the current Trump tally, but let’s charitably say this is a 60/40 percent chance for Trump.
MI - genuinely up in the air from my reading of the situation.
WI - again there is that gap that looks pretty sizeable but Milwaukee has yet to report and is expected to be very sizeable Dem. I think you give the edge to Biden here.
All in all, it’s on a knife edge but I could see Biden doing it. His team appear to be projecting confidence while Trump’s look defensive, if that is any reading of the situation, but it’s difficult to know if that’s from a reading of the campaign team’s view of the situation or whether it’s just projection.
Isn’t there a route via Nevada where he picks up GA and WI and gets exactly 270?
So to be clear from those charts the consensus view is that when the dust settles Trump has probably won this?
Jeez.
I would say so yes. For me the only way Biden will win is if he somehow sneaks GA. Looking at the numbers in the 3 rust belt states, and yes there are lots of postal votes still to be counted, but to me the gaps are too big for Biden to win more than 1 of them. So if he loses GA and it seems he may just fall short there , Trump wins.
Well done to HYUFD and Mr Ed for both sticking to their Trump guns in the face of what was very negative polling for him. My own forecast was that Biden would win but only just so looks like I was also wrong, though I knew the landslide talk was nonsense.
One thing we can all agree on: the USA badly needs an Electoral Commission and some clear rules on postal voting and vote counting. The way they do it is all a mess.
Would be unconstitutional to have a federal commission with any teeth as I understand it and expecting the states to clean up their acts is hopeless.
There's certainly a case for a constitutional amendment for this, but, if you're opening that can of worms, the whole political system needs radical reform.
On the whole, I'm very glad we have a Parliamentary system, which isn't perfect but at least allows the possibility of indecisive results leading to a coalition or a new election a few months later. Their Presidential system was set up in reaction to ours, but ironically has worn much worse.
Trafalgar must have done pretty well as far as pollsters are concerned.
What is the next event that people can smugly take the mickey out of @HYUFD over his predictions, before he’s right and they’re wrong?
The acid test will come when the non-conservative wins. If HY successfully predicts that, he will deserve kudos.
Maybe Tralfagar’s way of coming to their conclusions is better than traditional opinion polling
For sure. It is possible that HY is a shrewd judge of evidence and selected that, based on his experience, instinct and judgement, that he felt provided the best pointer of how things might go. And didn't bother to worry PB readers about the why and wherefore.
However it's also possible that he tipped the conservative to win because he always tips the conservative and wants the conservative to win, and simply dredges up whatever data he can find to support a preconceived outcome.
In the latter case, the surprise isn't HY's forecast, but the conservative win (if indeed that transpires).
As I said a few days back, if you always cheer for Arsenal, and Arsenal wins, you're a fan, not a pundit.
I guess the same goes for those lefties who wrote the threads that tipped Remain, said to lay Boris for the leadership, and backed Clinton and Biden?
Biden might still win of course. He’s only the same price now as Trump was 24 hours ago
That is not correct though is it (well it maybe for some)? It generally was because the evidence pointed to those results. If there is any criticism is not they were biased by their own bias but that they believed crap evidence. Should they have been aware the evidence was likely to have been crap or not?
It's human nature to prefer the evidence that supports a favoured conclusion, and we're all susceptible, and likely all guilty. I wanted Biden to win and took the apparently building evidence pointing that way at face value. Had the evidence been pointing the other way, I expect I would have made more effort to cross-examine it.
We are however living through a period when conservatives are usually the winners and social democrats usually the losers. So that someone who tends to predict the winner and someone who tends to predict the conservative look the exactly the same.
I still think Biden is value and it’s very much 50/50 at this. He needs, essentially, 2 of GA, MI, WI, PA and NC.
Let’s put NC in the Trump column immediately because it’s very very likely he will get a narrow win there.
The other states are harder to read:
GA - looks like it will be a nail biter. There are enough votes out there for Biden to take the victory, but it is going to be very very close.
PA - there are a lot of people suggesting the mail in ballots are going to bridge the gap. I think that looks a wee bit optimistic given the current Trump tally, but let’s charitably say this is a 60/40 percent chance for Trump.
MI - genuinely up in the air from my reading of the situation.
WI - again there is that gap that looks pretty sizeable but Milwaukee has yet to report and is expected to be very sizeable Dem. I think you give the edge to Biden here.
All in all, it’s on a knife edge but I could see Biden doing it. His team appear to be projecting confidence while Trump’s look defensive, if that is any reading of the situation, but it’s difficult to know if that’s from a reading of the campaign team’s view of the situation or whether it’s just projection.
Very crudely - I have put all the nytimes county results into a spreadsheet, then assumed the unreported votes go as their counties have currently gone. That doesn't include absentee ballots (I think).
I thought when doing this I would see that Biden has lots of votes to come in. But actually it doesn't look that way. It looks like the gap widens in all 3 states? Maybe i've miscalculated somehow...
Have you assumed that all votes to come mirror the votes cast so far? Whereas actually heavily Republican districts could have significant Biden votes outstanding, because Mail in.
It's not like a normal election where mail in ballots are a small proportion, and the outstanding votes are cast on the same basis as those already counted. So you can just work it out by whether areas to come are strong Dem or strong Republican.
Yes - that's what I've done. Thanks for giving me hope.
It looks like Trump is going to sweep the board in the midwest again winning Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. He looks like he is holding Georgia too. Is that not enough?
Trafalgar must have done pretty well as far as pollsters are concerned.
What is the next event that people can smugly take the mickey out of @HYUFD over his predictions, before he’s right and they’re wrong?
The acid test will come when the non-conservative wins. If HY successfully predicts that, he will deserve kudos.
Maybe Tralfagar’s way of coming to their conclusions is better than traditional opinion polling
For sure. It is possible that HY is a shrewd judge of evidence and selected that, based on his experience, instinct and judgement, that he felt provided the best pointer of how things might go. And didn't bother to worry PB readers about the why and wherefore.
However it's also possible that he tipped the conservative to win because he always tips the conservative and wants the conservative to win, and simply dredges up whatever data he can find to support a preconceived outcome.
In the latter case, the surprise isn't HY's forecast, but the conservative win (if indeed that transpires).
As I said a few days back, if you always cheer for Arsenal, and Arsenal wins, you're a fan, not a pundit.
I guess the same goes for those lefties who wrote the threads that tipped Remain, said to lay Boris for the leadership, and backed Clinton and Biden?
Biden might still win of course. He’s only the same price now as Trump was 24 hours ago
That is not correct though is it (well it maybe for some)? It generally was because the evidence pointed to those results. If there is any criticism is not they were biased by their own bias but that they believed crap evidence. Should they have been aware the evidence was likely to have been crap or not?
It's human nature to prefer the evidence that supports a favoured conclusion, and we're all susceptible, and likely all guilty. I wanted Biden to win and took the apparently building evidence pointing that way at face value. Had the evidence been pointing the other way, I expect I would have made more effort to cross-examine it.
We are however living through a period when conservatives are usually the winners and social democrats usually the losers. So that someone who tends to predict the winner and someone who tends to predict the conservative look the exactly the same.
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool" (RPF)
It applies just as much to the pandemic & is another reason why all the data should be made oublic.
It looks like Trump is going to sweep the board in the midwest again winning Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. He looks like he is holding Georgia too. Is that not enough?
Of course it is. But you're making massive assumptions about the split of votes to come. If it's all mail in ballots, and mail in ballots are, say, 2-1 Biden then it's nowhere near a sweep.
If Trump had handled covid only a fraction more competently, and its hard to see how he could have done worse, then he would certainly have been re-elected.
It looks like Trump is going to sweep the board in the midwest again winning Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. He looks like he is holding Georgia too. Is that not enough?
It looks like Trump is going to sweep the board in the midwest again winning Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. He looks like he is holding Georgia too. Is that not enough?
Why do you say it looks like that? Given the votes left out in Wisconsin, for example, it's very unclear. Milwaukee alone may have enough absentee votes with enough of a Biden lean to close the gap, or maybe not. And we don't know how other cities will skew with the remaining votes.
Trafalgar must have done pretty well as far as pollsters are concerned.
What is the next event that people can smugly take the mickey out of @HYUFD over his predictions, before he’s right and they’re wrong?
The acid test will come when the non-conservative wins. If HY successfully predicts that, he will deserve kudos.
Maybe Tralfagar’s way of coming to their conclusions is better than traditional opinion polling
For sure. It is possible that HY is a shrewd judge of evidence and selected that, based on his experience, instinct and judgement, that he felt provided the best pointer of how things might go. And didn't bother to worry PB readers about the why and wherefore.
However it's also possible that he tipped the conservative to win because he always tips the conservative and wants the conservative to win, and simply dredges up whatever data he can find to support a preconceived outcome.
In the latter case, the surprise isn't HY's forecast, but the conservative win (if indeed that transpires).
As I said a few days back, if you always cheer for Arsenal, and Arsenal wins, you're a fan, not a pundit.
I guess the same goes for those lefties who wrote the threads that tipped Remain, said to lay Boris for the leadership, and backed Clinton and Biden?
Biden might still win of course. He’s only the same price now as Trump was 24 hours ago
That is not correct though is it (well it maybe for some)? It generally was because the evidence pointed to those results. If there is any criticism is not they were biased by their own bias but that they believed crap evidence. Should they have been aware the evidence was likely to have been crap or not?
I think they should have been aware. Polls aren’t gospel, they are articles of faith as much as whatever Trafalgar do is, just the crowd on here treat the former with reverence, and work backwards when they’re wrong to find things they got right.
If Trump had handled covid only a fraction more competently, and its hard to see how he could have done worse, then he would certainly have been re-elected.
It is quite shocking how badly he handled the virus, but is on the verge of re-election.
Then again, the UK Tories are still holding up in the polls, mostly.
In the US, the tendency for presidents to get their second term appears a pretty strong pull on voters.
If Trump had handled covid only a fraction more competently, and its hard to see how he could have done worse, then he would certainly have been re-elected.
Personally I don't think Covid made much difference to the election result.
It looks like Trump is going to sweep the board in the midwest again winning Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. He looks like he is holding Georgia too. Is that not enough?
So to be clear from those charts the consensus view is that when the dust settles Trump has probably won this?
Jeez.
I would say so yes. For me the only way Biden will win is if he somehow sneaks GA. Looking at the numbers in the 3 rust belt states, and yes there are lots of postal votes still to be counted, but to me the gaps are too big for Biden to win more than 1 of them. So if he loses GA and it seems he may just fall short there , Trump wins.
Well done to HYUFD and Mr Ed for both sticking to their Trump guns in the face of what was very negative polling for him. My own forecast was that Biden would win but only just so looks like I was also wrong, though I knew the landslide talk was nonsense.
I'm infrequent on here at the moment but I've always said I can't see Sleepy Joe being POTUS and I went on record to say Crazy Nancy's shenanigans a couple of weeks ago ware a bad omen for the Dems
It looks like Trump is going to sweep the board in the midwest again winning Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. He looks like he is holding Georgia too. Is that not enough?
This is nonsense.
He might do those things but you have no evidence for it. Nor do I. Nor do the news channels.
Currently it's roughly 60:40 Biden gets to win but it's very tight.
If Trump had handled covid only a fraction more competently, and its hard to see how he could have done worse, then he would certainly have been re-elected.
It is quite shocking how badly he handled the virus, but is on the verge of re-election.
Then again, the UK Tories are still holding up in the polls, mostly.
In the US, the tendency for presidents to get their second term appears a pretty strong pull on voters.
To win elections in this internet age you need a big personality. Trump is completely mad but he is not boring, Biden is.
Any more views on GA? I can see Biden winning in WI, but losing PA and MI now. Which means he needs GA. I saw earlier posts suggesting its 50/50 but is that right? Or wishful thinking and another case of very close but no cigar like several other states.
I'm fairly confident Biden will win Wisconsin, so he gets to 254 ECVs.
PA just looks out of reach to me. Georgia prob narrowly Trump.
Which means it comes down to Michigan, and if Biden clinches it he probably wins 270 to 268.
I think he's lost Wisconsin. There's just not enough votes left.
Why not? 3.6% ahead with 17% to come. That means he just needs around 65% of outstanding votes. Which is certainly possible.
Yes I think WI is provably Biden’s best chance. If he doesn’t get GA though, it’s not enough. He’ll need Michigan too. I can’t really say what the state of the race is there, it looks a bit confused.
I don’t think he’s out of this though. I think the consensus on here seems to be forming around a second Trump term but I just don’t think we’ve got the necessary information for that yet.
Trafalgar must have done pretty well as far as pollsters are concerned.
What is the next event that people can smugly take the mickey out of @HYUFD over his predictions, before he’s right and they’re wrong?
The acid test will come when the non-conservative wins. If HY successfully predicts that, he will deserve kudos.
Maybe Tralfagar’s way of coming to their conclusions is better than traditional opinion polling
For sure. It is possible that HY is a shrewd judge of evidence and selected that, based on his experience, instinct and judgement, that he felt provided the best pointer of how things might go. And didn't bother to worry PB readers about the why and wherefore.
However it's also possible that he tipped the conservative to win because he always tips the conservative and wants the conservative to win, and simply dredges up whatever data he can find to support a preconceived outcome.
In the latter case, the surprise isn't HY's forecast, but the conservative win (if indeed that transpires).
As I said a few days back, if you always cheer for Arsenal, and Arsenal wins, you're a fan, not a pundit.
I guess the same goes for those lefties who wrote the threads that tipped Remain, said to lay Boris for the leadership, and backed Clinton and Biden?
Biden might still win of course. He’s only the same price now as Trump was 24 hours ago
As much as I love this site, I don't take much notice of what people think will happen because they are mostly biased to what they want to happen. There aren't many people who I trust to be objective, particularly in terms of this election. @Richard_Nabavi suggested that the figures coming out of from Florida yesterday weren't great for Biden, and that made me think that this was going to be close. I trust him to be objective. Most people on here, unfortunately, aren't.
Any more views on GA? I can see Biden winning in WI, but losing PA and MI now. Which means he needs GA. I saw earlier posts suggesting its 50/50 but is that right? Or wishful thinking and another case of very close but no cigar like several other states.
It looks like Trump is going to sweep the board in the midwest again winning Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. He looks like he is holding Georgia too. Is that not enough?
This is nonsense.
He might do those things but you have no evidence for it. Nor do I. Nor do the news channels.
Currently it's roughly 60:40 Biden gets to win but it's very tight.
The evidence is the votes cast and the votes outstanding. The problem I see is that even if Biden comes from behind in 1 of these its not enough. Trump has a margin of comfort right now.
Comments
Just like .. er .. one of them.
Everyone else must still be hung over.
Thanks for the Zoom call, @Barnesian .
Nice crisp, sunny day. Time for some garden.
Jefferson and co must be turning in their graves. I suppose you can say their experiment worked for a couple of hundred years.
Let’s put NC in the Trump column immediately because it’s very very likely he will get a narrow win there.
The other states are harder to read:
GA - looks like it will be a nail biter. There are enough votes out there for Biden to take the victory, but it is going to be very very close.
PA - there are a lot of people suggesting the mail in ballots are going to bridge the gap. I think that looks a wee bit optimistic given the current Trump tally, but let’s charitably say this is a 60/40 percent chance for Trump.
MI - genuinely up in the air from my reading of the situation.
WI - again there is that gap that looks pretty sizeable but Milwaukee has yet to report and is expected to be very sizeable Dem. I think you give the edge to Biden here.
All in all, it’s on a knife edge but I could see Biden doing it. His team appear to be projecting confidence while Trump’s look defensive, if that is any reading of the situation, but it’s difficult to know if that’s from a reading of the campaign team’s view of the situation or whether it’s just projection.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1114491.stm
"The people have spoken, but it will take a while to determine exactly what they said."
At least for another few hours.
I must admit, the numbers coming out of AP don't look great for Biden. We will see.
Shout out to @Barnesian and the rest of the Zoom crew. Some really useful analysis, a very educational experience all round. Certainly better punditry than CNN!
But if it's just Mail-in ballots to come, then it doesn't matter if it's a Rep or Dem area. Both are likely to close the gap for Biden.
Also - beware of the "% vote reported" stat. I don't think this is anything other than an estimate. It's not like the UK where the first thing they do is count the number of ballot papers and you know the numbers of votes cast, before you know how they were cast.
''State returning officer''
Also the amount of Dem votes in Georgia puts them in with at least 50/50 shout for the senate too?
If there is found to be a degree of fraud within there, intended to favour the Democrats, then that will really hurt them. They will be seen as trying to steal an election. The justification of "But it's to stop Trump!" will not play well.
Reminds of the saying "Never argue with an idiot". They drag you down to their level - and then win with experience.
I thought when doing this I would see that Biden has lots of votes to come in. But actually it doesn't look that way.
It looks like the gap widens in all 3 states? Maybe i've miscalculated somehow...
If Trump wins it's because Americans thought he'd make the better President for them. We need to understand why, and not grab fig leaves.
Davy Crockett also says hi - the reality TV star, before reality TV....
"Here’s a look at what we know about the outstanding vote in each battleground state:
Arizona: While some outlets, such as the Associated Press, have projected Arizona for Biden, ABC News has not. Before the election, officials did warn that any super-close races might not be resolved until the last votes are counted on Thursday or Friday. However, the race isn’t that close right now (Biden 52 percent, Trump 47 percent), so we might see a projection sooner.
Wisconsin: 81 percent of the expected vote is already reporting here, and the rest should trickle in over the next few hours. Earlier tonight, Milwaukee County (expected to be among the last places to finish counting) said to expect semi-final results around 6 a.m. Eastern.
Georgia: The big holdup here is Fulton County, which as of 2 a.m. was home to most of the outstanding ballots. The count there was delayed by a burst pipe (no ballots were damaged), and election officials told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution their goal was to go into Wednesday with just 20,000 ballots left to count. However, the secretary of state estimated those results would not be released until the afternoon.
Michigan: There are still hundreds of thousands of absentee ballots to be counted here, and it’s unclear if counting will continue throughout the night. Election officials did say earlier on Tuesday that they expected counting to wrap up by Wednesday night.
Pennsylvania: Major counties such as Philadelphia and Allegheny have reported their last ballots of the night (although Philadelphia will continue to count around the clock). Going into the election, many county and state election officials predicted that results wouldn’t approach completion until Friday.
North Carolina: 95 percent of the expected vote has already been counted here, so it seems quite possible that all we’re waiting on are late-arriving mail-in ballots, which have until Nov. 12 to arrive. That means we could be waiting over a week for a call here.
Maine: Honestly, this is anyone’s guess. Election officials are taking much longer here than they originally expected."
I take no pleasure in saying this but I did say that I was not convinced by all this talk of Biden landslides and that I feared there were more shy Trump voters than people were allowing for. Anyway, let's see.
One thing we can all agree on: the USA badly needs an Electoral Commission and some clear rules on postal voting and vote counting. The way they do it is all a mess.
Talking of which the role of Chair of the Electoral Commission over here is being advertised, for anyone interested.
Jeez.
However it's also possible that he tipped the conservative to win because he always tips the conservative and wants the conservative to win, and simply dredges up whatever data he can find to support a preconceived outcome.
In the latter case, the surprise isn't HY's forecast, but the conservative win (if indeed that transpires).
As I said a few days back, if you always cheer for Arsenal, and Arsenal wins, you're a fan, not a pundit.
I'm off to listen to music from one A Fältskog for half an hour. Blonde from Abba - 70 and a half last month. Then off for the pre-lockdown bike ride.
https://results.decisiondeskhq.com
It's not like a normal election where mail in ballots are a small proportion, and the outstanding votes are cast on the same basis as those already counted. So you can just work it out by whether areas to come are strong Dem or strong Republican.
Not a great night financially, about £400-500 in the red depending on how the spreads work out. My worst PB election night.
I hope Biden scrapes it, looking at that gurning orange oaf for another four years is not going to be pleasant, but could be worse, at least I am not American. It would be good if he would have to deal with some of his own mess, but I expect he will just run up the deficit and leave the bill for the next POTUS.
Back to the election - the promised red mirage is clearing and we have a new president. Just. Phew.
Time to do a days work now 🙂
Biden might still win of course. He’s only the same price now as Trump was 24 hours ago
https://twitter.com/benwikler/status/1323910181894397952
"When polls show a right winger winning they are robust rigorous and scientific. When the show someone even vaguely left of that who doesn't align with my beliefs then they are wishywashy nonsense that can't be trusted"
It's a solid system.
amrstrong
bedford
cameron
clarion
crawford
erie
fayette
fulton
huntingdon
pike
warren
york
All the above not done any counting yet
Philly - 32% outstanding
Bucks - 25% outstanding
Mongomery - 14% outstanding
More dramatic movements in the middle of the night?
PA just looks out of reach to me. Georgia prob narrowly Trump.
Which means it comes down to Michigan, and if Biden clinches it he probably wins 270 to 268.
Well done to HYUFD and Mr Ed for both sticking to their Trump guns in the face of what was very negative polling for him. My own forecast was that Biden would win but only just so looks like I was also wrong, though I knew the landslide talk was nonsense.
There's certainly a case for a constitutional amendment for this, but, if you're opening that can of worms, the whole political system needs radical reform.
On the whole, I'm very glad we have a Parliamentary system, which isn't perfect but at least allows the possibility of indecisive results leading to a coalition or a new election a few months later. Their Presidential system was set up in reaction to ours, but ironically has worn much worse.
We are however living through a period when conservatives are usually the winners and social democrats usually the losers. So that someone who tends to predict the winner and someone who tends to predict the conservative look the exactly the same.
It applies just as much to the pandemic & is another reason why all the data should be made oublic.
I can cash out now for an absolutely certain £1,600 haircut. Or I can stay in and win nearly £3k if Biden wins, but risk losing £3.4k if Trump wins.
I'm not sure I'll be much less happy with losing £3.4k compared to £1.6k, and even more annoyed if Biden eventually clinches it by a whisker.
What to do..?
Then again, the UK Tories are still holding up in the polls, mostly.
In the US, the tendency for presidents to get their second term appears a pretty strong pull on voters.
He might do those things but you have no evidence for it. Nor do I. Nor do the news channels.
Currently it's roughly 60:40 Biden gets to win but it's very tight.
I don’t think he’s out of this though. I think the consensus on here seems to be forming around a second Trump term but I just don’t think we’ve got the necessary information for that yet.
I got up at 5:20 (thanks to my bladder), checked the TV, groaned and returned to bed.
Although it does look like the voters, at least enough of them in the right places, prefer easy answers to honest answers.