Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Ready for President Chuck Grassley?

178101213

Comments

  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163

    https://twitter.com/Telegraph/status/1198357430293405698

    What was this called when Labour proposed it?

    Things unrepeatable in polite company.
  • https://twitter.com/Telegraph/status/1198357430293405698

    What was this called when Labour proposed it?

    Depending on the caveats, it’s quite cheap, but very clever retail politics. Don’t promise a cash sum, promise a change people can picture.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,676

    dr_spyn said:
    Will Labour let me fuck my neighbour's wife too?
    Yes but your neighbour has to have equal right to yours.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,616
    kle4 said:

    https://twitter.com/MoS_Politics/status/1198347409098711041

    Deltapoll, Tories -2, still massive lead though

    Weird LD movement lately. I think if they can settle around 15 they would take it.
    Their previous LD number looks an outlier.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    Chris said:

    Chris said:

    Chris said:

    Sorry which was the poll with a 19 point lead? I seem to have missed it :open_mouth:

    the outlier
    On any objective view, of course it is an outlier.

    In the last 9 polls shown by Britain Elects, the leads were 10, 10, 11, 12, 12, 13, 16, 18 and 19. The median is 12 - in other words, about one point higher than the lead at this time during the 2017 campaign.

    What I find remarkable is the confidence among Tories that 2017 isn't going to be repeated, despite the fact that the lead in the polls is so similar.

    Particularly as the main difference in the polls is that the Lib Dems are currently 7-8 points higher than they were in 2017. In other words, there is a bigger reservoir of potential anti-Tory tactical votes.

    Of course, none of us knows what it going to happen over the next three weeks. What surprises me is that so many people seem to think they do know!
    It is just 18 days away
    It's 19 days - two days short of three weeks.
    Poll day no campaigning. It’s 18.
    Really, it's irrelevant how exactly you count the days.

    The point is that the lead is only about one point more than at the same stage in 2017. Such changes as there were in the polls took place over about the last fortnight then, and they amounted to perhaps just one point decrease in the Tory rating, and perhaps two points increase in Labour's.

    But what really made the difference was that the final polls were systematically overestimating the lead by about 5 points. My question is whether people can be sure that's not happening again.
    .
    No. But underestimating by more than 5 may now be needed. Not impossible, polling companies seem to have an impossible job and getting it 'right' seems to be pure chance, but does seem more implausible.
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 10,061

    Floater said:

    How long before Labour comes out with its Socialist equivalent of Hague;s "Two weeks to save the pound"

    It will be the NHS and as they do it every couple of months no one listens anymore.
    Every couple of months? They do it every day . . . it is almost as common as antisemitic incidents.
    Soon Corbyn can retire to his allotment and check every day under the rhubarb leaves for Chuka and The Jews
  • Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905
    Cookie said:

    Chris said:

    Sorry which was the poll with a 19 point lead? I seem to have missed it :open_mouth:

    the outlier
    On any objective view, of course it is an outlier.

    In the last 9 polls shown by Britain Elects, the leads were 10, 10, 11, 12, 12, 13, 16, 18 and 19. The median is 12 - in other words, about one point higher than the lead at this time during the 2017 campaign.

    What I find remarkable is the confidence among Tories that 2017 isn't going to be repeated, despite the fact that the lead in the polls is so similar.

    Particularly as the main difference in the polls is that the Lib Dems are currently 7-8 points higher than they were in 2017. In other words, there is a bigger reservoir of potential anti-Tory tactical votes.

    Of course, none of us knows what it going to happen over the next three weeks. What surprises me is that so many people seem to think they do know!
    I'm an anti-Labourite rather than a Tory, but I'm certainly not complacent. I am *marginally* more confident now that the data appears to show the Labour has stalled, but I'm still very nervous. And probably will be until the result is known.
    Me too Black Rook. Calling it for the Tories now is like thinking the Terminator is defeated when there's still fifteen minutes of the film left to run.
    Indeed. And even if the relentless and evil machine is finally crushed, there's no guarantee that there won't be a sequel in which a new and even more vicious one comes to destroy us all. Oh the horror!
  • XtrainXtrain Posts: 341
    Chris said:

    Chris said:

    Chris said:

    Sorry which was the poll with a 19 point lead? I seem to have missed it :open_mouth:

    the outlier
    On any objective view, of course it is an outlier.

    In the last 9 polls shown by Britain Elects, the leads were 10, 10, 11, 12, 12, 13, 16, 18 and 19. The median is 12 - in other words, about one point higher than the lead at this time during the 2017 campaign.

    What I find remarkable is the confidence among Tories that 2017 isn't going to be repeated, despite the fact that the lead in the polls is so similar.

    Particularly as the main difference in the polls is that the Lib Dems are currently 7-8 points higher than they were in 2017. In other words, there is a bigger reservoir of potential anti-Tory tactical votes.

    Of course, none of us knows what it going to happen over the next three weeks. What surprises me is that so many people seem to think they do know!
    It is just 18 days away
    It's 19 days - two days short of three weeks.
    Poll day no campaigning. It’s 18.
    Really, it's irrelevant how exactly you count the days.

    The point is that the lead is only about one point more than at the same stage in 2017. Such changes as there were in the polls took place over about the last fortnight then, and they amounted to perhaps just one point decrease in the Tory rating, and perhaps two points increase in Labour's.

    But what really made the difference was that the final polls were systematically overestimating the lead by about 5 points. My question is whether people can be sure that's not happening again.
    .
    You can never be sure.
  • FloaterFloater Posts: 14,207

    Floater said:

    How long before Labour comes out with its Socialist equivalent of Hague;s "Two weeks to save the pound"

    It will be the NHS and as they do it every couple of months no one listens anymore.
    Every couple of months? They do it every day . . . it is almost as common as antisemitic incidents.

    Floater said:

    How long before Labour comes out with its Socialist equivalent of Hague;s "Two weeks to save the pound"

    It will be the NHS and as they do it every couple of months no one listens anymore.
    Every couple of months? They do it every day . . . it is almost as common as antisemitic incidents.
    Be real - no way is it as common as anti semitic incidents
  • ByronicByronic Posts: 3,578

    Byronic said:

    After the Tories' euphoria over this evening's Opinium 19% lead for them, it's back to earth with YouGov who report an unchanged 12% lead for the Blue team, indicating a far more modest majority of just 36 seats. It wouldn't take much of a late swing to eliminate that. It's not all over yet, not by any means.



    Baxtering Deltapoll’s 13 lead gives a Tory majority of 102

    Just shows how quickly a win becomes a landslide if the Tories have a double digit lead
    That simply isn't so. Adopting Deltapoll's 13% lead for the Tories, as opposed to YouGov's 12% lead, you clearly haven't correctly completed the section loading support for the SNP in Scotland. Having done this myself, allowing them 42% of the vote North of the Border and also allocating 3% of the OK vote to the Greens, although they only win 1 seat, this results in the Tories winning 360 seats for an overall majority of 70 seats, way short of the 102 seat majority you wrongly claim.
    Whatevs. The Tory lead doubles with just one point extra. My thesis is good. You’re just a pedant obsessed with maths and “getting the sums right”, like that matters. It’s just pathetic.
  • ozymandiasozymandias Posts: 1,503

    Floater said:

    How long before Labour comes out with its Socialist equivalent of Hague;s "Two weeks to save the pound"

    It will be the NHS and as they do it every couple of months no one listens anymore.
    Every couple of months? They do it every day . . . it is almost as common as antisemitic incidents.
    Soon Corbyn can retire to his allotment and check every day under the rhubarb leaves for Chuka and The Jews
    Alternatively re-purpose his allotment for re-development into a Synagogue and Israeli Community centre.
  • felixfelix Posts: 15,164
    there is a severe straw shortage being created on here tonight as Corbynistas are buying up balefuls for clutching purposes.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426

    https://twitter.com/Telegraph/status/1198357430293405698

    What was this called when Labour proposed it?

    It is not the headlines but Boris canvassing with his Father that is good to see
    Stan (Laurel) and one who is always Hard-y?
  • https://twitter.com/Telegraph/status/1198357430293405698

    What was this called when Labour proposed it?

    Daft and it’s daft from the Cons - oooh we are soooo green and Greta - but take your Range Rover 3 miles for a scan on your ingrowing toe nail and chug out those fumes with free parking.

  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936
    edited November 2019
    Flashy5 said:

    https://twitter.com/Telegraph/status/1198357430293405698

    What was this called when Labour proposed it?

    Daft and it’s daft from the Cons - oooh we are soooo green and Greta - but take your Range Rover 3 miles for a scan on your ingrowing toe nail and chug out those fumes with free parking.

    what? :D
  • Byronic said:

    The average Tory lead must be near 13, 14 now?

    That’s huge.

    13.5% for the 10 polls so far this week excluding Deltapoll (just seen that one!)
    13.5% for the 11 polls including Deltapoll!
  • Is that MRP coming or...?
  • Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905

    https://twitter.com/Telegraph/status/1198357430293405698

    What was this called when Labour proposed it?

    I don't seem to recall the hospital parking charges pledge being particularly contentious.

    It was the total weight of spending, the preposterous claims about how it was to be paid for, the huge wave of needless nationalisations and the plans to confiscate property at will that didn't go down so well.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426
    Flashy5 said:

    https://twitter.com/Telegraph/status/1198357430293405698

    What was this called when Labour proposed it?

    Daft and it’s daft from the Cons - oooh we are soooo green and Greta - but take your Range Rover 3 miles for a scan on your ingrowing toe nail and chug out those fumes with free parking.

    It’s also going to make it bloody hard to park at hospitals for those who need to, rather than those with routine appointments who can catch the bus.

    (I walk, which I appreciate I am fortunate in being able to do)
  • EndillionEndillion Posts: 4,976

    dr_spyn said:
    Will Labour let me fuck my neighbour's wife too?
    Yes but your neighbour has to have equal right to yours.
    Unless your neighbour's a higher rate taxpayer, right?
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,751
    kle4 said:

    Chris said:

    Chris said:

    Chris said:

    Sorry which was the poll with a 19 point lead? I seem to have missed it :open_mouth:

    the outlier
    On any objective view, of course it is an outlier.

    In the last 9 polls shown by Britain Elects, the leads were 10, 10, 11, 12, 12, 13, 16, 18 and 19. The median is 12 - in other words, about one point higher than the lead at this time during the 2017 campaign.

    What I find remarkable is the confidence among Tories that 2017 isn't going to be repeated, despite the fact that the lead in the polls is so similar.

    Particularly as the main difference in the polls is that the Lib Dems are currently 7-8 points higher than they were in 2017. In other words, there is a bigger reservoir of potential anti-Tory tactical votes.

    Of course, none of us knows what it going to happen over the next three weeks. What surprises me is that so many people seem to think they do know!
    It is just 18 days away
    It's 19 days - two days short of three weeks.
    Poll day no campaigning. It’s 18.
    Really, it's irrelevant how exactly you count the days.

    The point is that the lead is only about one point more than at the same stage in 2017. Such changes as there were in the polls took place over about the last fortnight then, and they amounted to perhaps just one point decrease in the Tory rating, and perhaps two points increase in Labour's.

    But what really made the difference was that the final polls were systematically overestimating the lead by about 5 points. My question is whether people can be sure that's not happening again.
    .
    No. But underestimating by more than 5 may now be needed.
    As I keep saying, according to the polls the lead is about one point more than at this point last time.

    But if you're taking comfort from that one point extra lead over Labour, you need to remember that at this point in 2017 the polls put the Tories about 37 points ahead of the Lib Dems, compared with only 26-27 points now.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,468
    Interesting to see the detail on the hospital car parking charges policy. The RVI in Newcastle is right in the middle of the city and its car parks are constantly full, so much so that staff are not allowed to park there.

    No charges and it will be used by shoppers or commuters and the problem will get worse.
  • So MRP is saying not a wipe out for Labour - but a modest Tory majority. What lead that does that imply?
  • That's terrible for the LDs and rather better than I'd thought for the SNP.
  • RogerRoger Posts: 19,914

    https://twitter.com/Telegraph/status/1198357430293405698

    What was this called when Labour proposed it?

    It is not the headlines but Boris canvassing with his Father that is good to see
    Yes it's nice to know that one member of the family hasn't disowned him
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936
    I thought more parliamentary scrutiny was a good thing? :)
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 10,061
    Polls aside from Opinium settling on a low double figure lead of about 12%. Enough for a very tidy majority
  • ByronicByronic Posts: 3,578
    Tories would be more than happy with that. A solid majority, enough to deliver Brexit, and see through 5 years. Bring it on.
  • squareroot2squareroot2 Posts: 6,729
    Floater said:

    dr_spyn said:
    You know they will blame ... a dark conspiracy by powerful shadowy figures .... you just know it.
    You mean the jews?
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426
    Hmmm.

    Carmarthen East, Ceredigion, Dwyfor, Arfon, Ynys Môn.

    Not sure Plaid will get all five.
  • I'm fairly sure this is similar to the first MRP prediction last time and it was all downhill from there?
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936
    Byronic said:

    Tories would be more than happy with that. A solid majority, enough to deliver Brexit, and see through 5 years. Bring it on.
    Also isn't too big, keeping the activists on their toes.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    edited November 2019
    Honestly, I don't understand how anyone used to win a big majority.

    So MRP is saying not a wipe out for Labour - but a modest Tory majority. What lead that does that imply?

    If Labour are above 200 but going backwards it is bad but not disastrous, if they drop below 200 it's catastrophic, I'd suggest, 9 years into a tory led government.
  • Flashy5 said:

    https://twitter.com/Telegraph/status/1198357430293405698

    What was this called when Labour proposed it?

    Daft and it’s daft from the Cons - oooh we are soooo green and Greta - but take your Range Rover 3 miles for a scan on your ingrowing toe nail and chug out those fumes with free parking.

    To be fair, I wouldn’t want to walk three miles with an ingrowing toenail.

    Here the devil will be in the detail: my local hospital in in the town centre so parking charges help discourage people parking there and then going into town. There are some obvious workarounds, but I can see the policy making finding a space even worse.
  • Is this like the Best for Britain one, with second-hand YouGov data?

    Lib Dems only on 14. That would be bad for them.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936

    I'm fairly sure this is similar to the first MRP prediction last time and it was all downhill from there?

    Except Labour had been gaining for about a week by this point.
  • Interesting to see the detail on the hospital car parking charges policy. The RVI in Newcastle is right in the middle of the city and its car parks are constantly full, so much so that staff are not allowed to park there.

    No charges and it will be used by shoppers or commuters and the problem will get worse.

    Correct - it’s a statist one size fits all policy that should be left to each hospital to figure out - not a dictat from No 10.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 38,868
  • BTW, apparently it's not a YouGov model as per last time, it's just using YouGov data. Don't know how or if that impacts the result
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426

    So MRP is saying not a wipe out for Labour - but a modest Tory majority. What lead that does that imply?

    This would be their joint worst result in terms of seats since World War II. If ‘not a wipeout’ is their new metric they are more fecked than a White House intern under Clinton.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,724
    edited November 2019

    Interesting to see the detail on the hospital car parking charges policy. The RVI in Newcastle is right in the middle of the city and its car parks are constantly full, so much so that staff are not allowed to park there.

    No charges and it will be used by shoppers or commuters and the problem will get worse.

    Yes, that is a problem for Leicester Royal Infirmary. When it was free, commuters would park there then walk into town. Very busy for rugby and football matches as well.

    Presumably parking will be free for staff too!
  • ByronicByronic Posts: 3,578

    Flashy5 said:

    https://twitter.com/Telegraph/status/1198357430293405698

    What was this called when Labour proposed it?

    Daft and it’s daft from the Cons - oooh we are soooo green and Greta - but take your Range Rover 3 miles for a scan on your ingrowing toe nail and chug out those fumes with free parking.

    To be fair, I wouldn’t want to walk three miles with an ingrowing toenail.

    Here the devil will be in the detail: my local hospital in in the town centre so parking charges help discourage people parking there and then going into town. There are some obvious workarounds, but I can see the policy making finding a space even worse.
    Surely they’d adopt a supermarket approach. If you go to the hospital and see someone you get a ticket docked. Which allows free parking. Simple
  • Byronic said:

    Tories would be more than happy with that. A solid majority, enough to deliver Brexit, and see through 5 years. Bring it on.
    I would be delighted
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,679
    edited November 2019
    NOTE THIS IS NOT THE OFFICIAL YOUGOV MRP

    Merely another organisation using YouGov data and applying their own methodology.
  • https://twitter.com/Telegraph/status/1198357430293405698

    What was this called when Labour proposed it?

    This just demonstrates Boris's teflon quality - he's politically invincible. Let's be honest, if Boris stood up tomorrow and promised free broadband for all it would be declared a masterstroke. Unfair perhaps, but Boris has earned this by outwitting the EU at every turn and securing the greatest Brexit deal imaginable.
  • CookieCookie Posts: 13,843
    ydoethur said:

    Hmmm.

    Carmarthen East, Ceredigion, Dwyfor, Arfon, Ynys Môn.

    Not sure Plaid will get all five.
    I have a slight fancy for Plaid winning Rhondda.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936

    NOTE THIS IS NOT THE OFFICIAL YOUGOV MRP

    Merely another organisation using YouGov data and applying their own methodology.

    for feck's sake... gimme the real MRP.
  • If that result is repeated, what percentage of the vote are Tories and Labour on? Surely a lot tighter than 19 points?
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 38,868

    NOTE THIS IS NOT THE OFFICIAL YOUGOV MRP

    Merely another organisation using YouGov data and applying their own methodology.

    Boooooo.
  • Foxy said:

    Interesting to see the detail on the hospital car parking charges policy. The RVI in Newcastle is right in the middle of the city and its car parks are constantly full, so much so that staff are not allowed to park there.

    No charges and it will be used by shoppers or commuters and the problem will get worse.

    Yes, that is a problem for Leicester Royal Infirmary. When it was free, commuters would park there then walk into town. Very busy for rugby and football matches as well.

    Presumably parking will be free for staff too!
    I hope so
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426
    Cookie said:

    ydoethur said:

    Hmmm.

    Carmarthen East, Ceredigion, Dwyfor, Arfon, Ynys Môn.

    Not sure Plaid will get all five.
    I have a slight fancy for Plaid winning Rhondda.
    Your personal romantic fantasies are no concern of ours.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936

    If that result is repeated, what percentage of the vote are Tories and Labour on? Surely a lot tighter than 19 points?

    Well if it's the YouGov numbers they are using, I suspect it's the same as the YouGov lead...
  • Chris said:

    kle4 said:

    Chris said:

    Chris said:

    Chris said:

    Sorry which was the poll with a 19 point lead? I seem to have missed it :open_mouth:

    the outlier
    On any objective view, of course it is an outlier.

    In the last 9 polls shown by Britain Elects, the leads were 10, 10, 11, 12, 12, 13, 16, 18 and 19. The median is 12 - in other words, about one point higher than the lead at this time during the 2017 campaign.

    What I find remarkable is the confidence among Tories that 2017 isn't going to be repeated, despite the fact that the lead in the polls is so similar.

    Particularly as the main difference in the polls is that the Lib Dems are currently 7-8 points higher than they were in 2017. In other words, there is a bigger reservoir of potential anti-Tory tactical votes.

    Of course, none of us knows what it going to happen over the next three weeks. What surprises me is that so many people seem to think they do know!
    It is just 18 days away
    It's 19 days - two days short of three weeks.
    Poll day no campaigning. It’s 18.
    Really, it's irrelevant how exactly you count the days.

    The point is that the lead is only about one point more than at the same stage in 2017. Such changes as there were in the polls took place over about the last fortnight then, and they amounted to perhaps just one point decrease in the Tory rating, and perhaps two points increase in Labour's.

    But what really made the difference was that the final polls were systematically overestimating the lead by about 5 points. My question is whether people can be sure that's not happening again.
    .
    No. But underestimating by more than 5 may now be needed.
    As I keep saying, according to the polls the lead is about one point more than at this point last time.

    But if you're taking comfort from that one point extra lead over Labour, you need to remember that at this point in 2017 the polls put the Tories about 37 points ahead of the Lib Dems, compared with only 26-27 points now.
    You keep comparing it to 2017. What was the Tory lead this far out from the 2015 election?
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,468
    Byronic said:

    Flashy5 said:

    https://twitter.com/Telegraph/status/1198357430293405698

    What was this called when Labour proposed it?

    Daft and it’s daft from the Cons - oooh we are soooo green and Greta - but take your Range Rover 3 miles for a scan on your ingrowing toe nail and chug out those fumes with free parking.

    To be fair, I wouldn’t want to walk three miles with an ingrowing toenail.

    Here the devil will be in the detail: my local hospital in in the town centre so parking charges help discourage people parking there and then going into town. There are some obvious workarounds, but I can see the policy making finding a space even worse.
    Surely they’d adopt a supermarket approach. If you go to the hospital and see someone you get a ticket docked. Which allows free parking. Simple
    Who’s going to do that? How would they verify it? Where would it take place?

    Nothing is as simple as that.
  • RobD said:

    If that result is repeated, what percentage of the vote are Tories and Labour on? Surely a lot tighter than 19 points?

    Well if it's the YouGov numbers they are using, I suspect it's the same as the YouGov lead...
    Ah I didn't realise it was that simple, thanks
  • BromBrom Posts: 3,760
    Floater said:

    dr_spyn said:
    You know they will blame ... a dark conspiracy by powerful shadowy figures .... you just know it.
    Jon Trickett is quite possibly one of these idiots
  • NOTE THIS IS NOT THE OFFICIAL YOUGOV MRP

    Merely another organisation using YouGov data and applying their own methodology.

    Ah.
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 4,502

    NOTE THIS IS NOT THE OFFICIAL YOUGOV MRP

    Merely another organisation using YouGov data and applying their own methodology.

    I’m now very confused ! Does this mean YouGov themselves won’t be doing their own , if they are why would they let someone else use their data ?
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426
    No. That will be Thornberry.

    Corbyn or Johnson would be much sweeter, but also somewhat unlikely.
  • If the lead is 10 points as per ComRes, I think Labour can do it - but if it's any higher they can't.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 38,868

    Byronic said:

    Flashy5 said:

    https://twitter.com/Telegraph/status/1198357430293405698

    What was this called when Labour proposed it?

    Daft and it’s daft from the Cons - oooh we are soooo green and Greta - but take your Range Rover 3 miles for a scan on your ingrowing toe nail and chug out those fumes with free parking.

    To be fair, I wouldn’t want to walk three miles with an ingrowing toenail.

    Here the devil will be in the detail: my local hospital in in the town centre so parking charges help discourage people parking there and then going into town. There are some obvious workarounds, but I can see the policy making finding a space even worse.
    Surely they’d adopt a supermarket approach. If you go to the hospital and see someone you get a ticket docked. Which allows free parking. Simple
    Who’s going to do that? How would they verify it? Where would it take place?

    Nothing is as simple as that.
    The supermarket near my parents has a number plate scanner on entry and exit, it automatically gives you a ticket if you stay longer than the 3h limit.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936

    If the lead is 10 points as per ComRes, I think Labour can do it - but if it's any higher they can't.

    Do what?
  • Byronic said:

    Flashy5 said:

    https://twitter.com/Telegraph/status/1198357430293405698

    What was this called when Labour proposed it?

    Daft and it’s daft from the Cons - oooh we are soooo green and Greta - but take your Range Rover 3 miles for a scan on your ingrowing toe nail and chug out those fumes with free parking.

    To be fair, I wouldn’t want to walk three miles with an ingrowing toenail.

    Here the devil will be in the detail: my local hospital in in the town centre so parking charges help discourage people parking there and then going into town. There are some obvious workarounds, but I can see the policy making finding a space even worse.
    Surely they’d adopt a supermarket approach. If you go to the hospital and see someone you get a ticket docked. Which allows free parking. Simple
    Exactly: an obvious workaround.
  • Very close in fact to the Baxterised projection of YouGov's own poll this evening and also to the likes of Prof. Stephen Fisher and indeed the spread-betting markets.
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 10,061
    They cut 20k off Raabs majority but only get 14 seats??? Seems a little odd
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,724
    Sounds about right to me, thoughI think a bit light on the LDs, who are pretty steadily polling at double 2017 figures.

  • We've got the bizarre situation of the Tories going from NOM to mega-landslide while still losing seats. This is surely an exceptional occurrence.
  • So the Tory manifesto is going to be boring, very very boring
  • ozymandiasozymandias Posts: 1,503

    So the Tory manifesto is going to be boring, very very boring

    But sane.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936

    So the Tory manifesto is going to be boring, very very boring

    Somehow I don't think you are the target audience.
  • ByronicByronic Posts: 3,578

    Byronic said:

    Flashy5 said:

    https://twitter.com/Telegraph/status/1198357430293405698

    What was this called when Labour proposed it?

    Daft and it’s daft from the Cons - oooh we are soooo green and Greta - but take your Range Rover 3 miles for a scan on your ingrowing toe nail and chug out those fumes with free parking.

    To be fair, I wouldn’t want to walk three miles with an ingrowing toenail.

    Here the devil will be in the detail: my local hospital in in the town centre so parking charges help discourage people parking there and then going into town. There are some obvious workarounds, but I can see the policy making finding a space even worse.
    Surely they’d adopt a supermarket approach. If you go to the hospital and see someone you get a ticket docked. Which allows free parking. Simple
    Who’s going to do that? How would they verify it? Where would it take place?

    Nothing is as simple as that.
    Have you really not been in car parks or shopping centres where they do this?
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    Why would Raab be so vulnerable? I mean, he's pretty bad but that's no barrier to people retaining stonking majorities, are there local factors at play?
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,751

    Chris said:

    kle4 said:

    Chris said:

    Chris said:

    Chris said:

    Sorry which was the poll with a 19 point lead? I seem to have missed it :open_mouth:

    the outlier
    On any objective view, of course it is an outlier.

    In the last 9 polls shown by Britain Elects, the leads were 10, 10, 11, 12, 12, 13, 16, 18 and 19. The median is 12 - in other words, about one point higher than the lead at this time during the 2017 campaign.

    What I find remarkable is the confidence among Tories that 2017 isn't going to be repeated, despite the fact that the lead in the polls is so similar.

    Particularly as the main difference in the polls is that the Lib Dems are currently 7-8 points higher than they were in 2017. In other words, there is a bigger reservoir of potential anti-Tory tactical votes.

    Of course, none of us knows what it going to happen over the next three weeks. What surprises me is that so many people seem to think they do know!
    It is just 18 days away
    It's 19 days - two days short of three weeks.
    Poll day no campaigning. It’s 18.
    Really, it's irrelevant how exactly you count the days.

    The point is that the lead is only about one point more than at the same stage in 2017. Such changes as there were in the polls took place over about the last fortnight then, and they amounted to perhaps just one point decrease in the Tory rating, and perhaps two points increase in Labour's.

    But what really made the difference was that the final polls were systematically overestimating the lead by about 5 points. My question is whether people can be sure that's not happening again.
    .
    No. But underestimating by more than 5 may now be needed.
    As I keep saying, according to the polls the lead is about one point more than at this point last time.

    But if you're taking comfort from that one point extra lead over Labour, you need to remember that at this point in 2017 the polls put the Tories about 37 points ahead of the Lib Dems, compared with only 26-27 points now.
    You keep comparing it to 2017. What was the Tory lead this far out from the 2015 election?
    That's not really relevant. I'm not trying to make a projection.

    I'm simply suggesting people shouldn't be confident that the same thing as 2017 won't happen again - because we are very close to the same situation, according to the polls. That doesn't imply they should be confident the same thing will happen again!
  • ydoethur said:

    Hmmm.

    Carmarthen East, Ceredigion, Dwyfor, Arfon, Ynys Môn.

    Not sure Plaid will get all five.
    It's probably less accurate in the Plaid and SNP contests.
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,534



    I think it's simply a correction to the last poll, which had a weird LD dip. Corbyn's improved leader rating reflects the debate, where a substantial majority said he "did well", and he effectively tied the result - quite a lot of people thought "He's actually not that bad" but without rushing to vote Labour.

    most people didn't watch the debate, nor do they give a flying fuck about the debate either. to ascribe changes in polling to a debate few watched is ludicrous IMHO.. WVM loathes Corbyn.. you heard it here ………….
    To what do you ascribe the sharp recovery in Corbyn's rating, then (admittedly just from "dreadful" to "bad")? I'm not wedded to the debate theory, but it's the obvious thing for a change during this week, no? It's not helped the party yet, though, so it's of marginal interest.
  • RobD said:

    If the lead is 10 points as per ComRes, I think Labour can do it - but if it's any higher they can't.

    Do what?
    Cause a Hung Parliament
  • That is pretty similar to my model, which awards the Tories 353 seats, Labour 205, Lib Dem 18, SNP 51, Green 1 and PC 4, for a majority of 62. Waiting for the next Survation though to update the results.
  • BromBrom Posts: 3,760
    Majority of 48. That would be lovely.
  • So the Tory manifesto is going to be boring, very very boring

    Boring the better. No dementia tax foul ups
  • nico67 said:

    NOTE THIS IS NOT THE OFFICIAL YOUGOV MRP

    Merely another organisation using YouGov data and applying their own methodology.

    I’m now very confused ! Does this mean YouGov themselves won’t be doing their own , if they are why would they let someone else use their data ?
    YouGov will be doing their own version which should come out next week.

    YouGov do sell their data to other organisations so they can do their analysis/predictions.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163

    So the Tory manifesto is going to be boring, very very boring

    Well, I promise to go through it with a moderately fine toothcomb if anyone wants to skip it in that case.
  • How can the Lib Dems be on only 14 seats in this model and within 3,000 votes of unseating Raab?

    I would have thought that if they get that close to winning Raab's seat they would have to be into the high 20s at a minimum already.
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 4,502
    kle4 said:

    Why would Raab be so vulnerable? I mean, he's pretty bad but that's no barrier to people retaining stonking majorities, are there local factors at play?
    It voted Remain but wasn’t like a stonking majority . Perhaps the fact he’s a vile odious creep is having an impact but that’s not an impediment to people like Francois and the rest of the ERG nutjobs .

    I can’t see the Tories losing Esher , that would only have a chance if they were having a bad night and I just can’t see that happening .
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,696
    kle4 said:

    So the Tory manifesto is going to be boring, very very boring

    Well, I promise to go through it with a moderately fine toothcomb if anyone wants to skip it in that case.
    Will the Tories be costing their proposals this time?
  • kle4 said:

    Why would Raab be so vulnerable? I mean, he's pretty bad but that's no barrier to people retaining stonking majorities, are there local factors at play?
    Hardline Brexiteer in a very Remainy part of the world.

    He's a human dildo given the way he's embarrassed himself over the location of Dover and handling of the Harry Dunn incident. Threatening to bankrupt his parents is not a good look.
  • If I had to guess I'd put the SNP at 43-44 seats in Scotland, not 49.
  • Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905
    Had hoped to see Labour beaten down to sub-200 but that would do as a result.

    48 is more than enough to see the Govt through to 2024. They could execute boundary reform, wait for the SNP to win in 2021 and legislate for Indyref2. Notional majority of maybe 75 going into the next election, or more like 125 if Scotland goes.

    Meanwhile, Ladbrokes now rate a Tory majority at 2/5, Hung Parliament at 9/4. Con at 1/20 for most seats.

    The Rook household is united in its loathing of Corbyn and is trying not to get too excited. We both still fear that it could all go disastrously wrong...
  • I've been deliberately avoiding all the political news today - are we good? :smile:
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 4,502

    nico67 said:

    NOTE THIS IS NOT THE OFFICIAL YOUGOV MRP

    Merely another organisation using YouGov data and applying their own methodology.

    I’m now very confused ! Does this mean YouGov themselves won’t be doing their own , if they are why would they let someone else use their data ?
    YouGov will be doing their own version which should come out next week.

    YouGov do sell their data to other organisations so they can do their analysis/predictions.
    Thanks for that . Very much appreciated. The YouGov model did pretty well last time .
  • Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905
    BluerBlue said:

    I've been deliberately avoiding all the political news today - are we good? :smile:

    Possibly. Nobody really knows.
This discussion has been closed.