Hence forth Tory Swinson is renamed super Jo as she has managed to halve LD VI in a couple of months.
Long may she reign.
Well at least she doesn't help the tories as much as corbyn whch i is the single reason Johnson is heading for a majority.
Why are LDs down from 22 to 12?
Nothing to do with Super Jo or Jezza?
Totally due to the sheer horror that many people feel about corbyn getting into power, you should really question why you want to lose elections and fail the people you pretend to want to help because losing with a true socialist platform is more important than actually changing people’s lives. Labour sub 200 big Tory majority all because of corbyn and his clique.
So since October LD down from 22 to 12 and its all Corbyns fault. At least your consistent.
Your leader is a voter repellent hypocritical lightweight you should get rid and get Layla in.
No way LD vote would be nose diving faster than a Beoing 737 Max without Super Jo.
You would find any lib dem leader repellent because you see them trying to occupy your entitled space in the ‘any but Tory vote’ spectrum and the bastards get elected to local councils depriving you of your god given right to anoint the next labour candidate. The tories believe the same, the duopoly is all they want to preserve but it will be what it will be. I predict that corbyn will be an even better helper than Michael Foot was to the Tory cause. It’s you’re own fault, nobody else you support him you live with him but at least criticism lib dem policies rather than petty personality slurs.
"Totally" she is totally shite.
Which policies the skills wallet winner or the 30 trillion trees
Hence forth Tory Swinson is renamed super Jo as she has managed to halve LD VI in a couple of months.
Long may she reign.
Well at least she doesn't help the tories as much as corbyn whch i is the single reason Johnson is heading for a majority.
Why are LDs down from 22 to 12?
Nothing to do with Super Jo or Jezza?
Totally due to the sheer horror that many people feel about corbyn getting into power, you should really question why you want to lose elections and fail the people you pretend to want to help because losing with a true socialist platform is more important than actually changing people’s lives. Labour sub 200 big Tory majority all because of corbyn and his clique.
So since October LD down from 22 to 12 and its all Corbyns fault. At least your consistent.
Your leader is a voter repellent hypocritical lightweight you should get rid and get Layla in.
No way LD vote would be nose diving faster than a Beoing 737 Max without Super Jo.
As has already been explained, the LD vote going down is because of successful tactical voting. It will be going up in LD target seats and dropping rapidly in non-target seats to avoid splitting the remain vote. There are many more non-target seats so the average LD share comes down but hopefully the number of targets seats won by LDs goes up.
I'm not dismayed by it. It's nothing to do with Jo but a function of successful targeting.
But there is something fundamentally wrong with your model in London. I do not suggest the LDs will win Finchley or Hampstead - but those LD %s are impossible.
Hence forth Tory Swinson is renamed super Jo as she has managed to halve LD VI in a couple of months.
Long may she reign.
Well at least she doesn't help the tories as much as corbyn whch i is the single reason Johnson is heading for a majority.
Why are LDs down from 22 to 12?
Nothing to do with Super Jo or Jezza?
Totally due to the sheer horror that many people feel about corbyn getting into power, you should really question why you want to lose elections and fail the people you pretend to want to help because losing with a true socialist platform is more important than actually changing people’s lives. Labour sub 200 big Tory majority all because of corbyn and his clique.
So since October LD down from 22 to 12 and its all Corbyns fault. At least your consistent.
Your leader is a voter repellent hypocritical lightweight you should get rid and get Layla in.
No way LD vote would be nose diving faster than a Beoing 737 Max without Super Jo.
You would find any lib dem leader repellent because you see them trying to occupy your entitled space in the ‘any but Tory vote’ spectrum and the bastards get elected to local councils depriving you of your god given right to anoint the next labour candidate. The tories believe the same, the duopoly is all they want to preserve but it will be what it will be. I predict that corbyn will be an even better helper than Michael Foot was to the Tory cause. It’s you’re own fault, nobody else you support him you live with him but at least criticism lib dem policies rather than petty personality slurs.
"Totally" she is totally shite.
Which policies the skills wallet winner or the 30 trillion trees
It is difficult to know why you should want to play the caricature of a student trot in such a way that will repel any floating voters - but I guess that is another small benefit to the LDs.
Why Daniel Levy blames his manager when he is completely culpable is beyond me. A lying shyster who I still recall tapping up Berahino and ruining his career by suggesting he had made a £20m+ offer when it was £5m + add ons which would have never been paid.
Hence forth Tory Swinson is renamed super Jo as she has managed to halve LD VI in a couple of months.
Long may she reign.
Well at least she doesn't help the tories as much as corbyn whch i is the single reason Johnson is heading for a majority.
Why are LDs down from 22 to 12?
Nothing to do with Super Jo or Jezza?
Totally due to the sheer horror that many people feel about corbyn getting into power, you should really question why you want to lose elections and fail the people you pretend to want to help because losing with a true socialist platform is more important than actually changing people’s lives. Labour sub 200 big Tory majority all because of corbyn and his clique.
So since October LD down from 22 to 12 and its all Corbyns fault. At least your consistent.
Your leader is a voter repellent hypocritical lightweight you should get rid and get Layla in.
No way LD vote would be nose diving faster than a Beoing 737 Max without Super Jo.
You would find any lib dem leader repellent because you see them trying to occupy your entitled space in the ‘any but Tory vote’ spectrum and the bastards get elected to local councils depriving you of your god given right to anoint the next labour candidate. The tories believe the same, the duopoly is all they want to preserve but it will be what it will be. I predict that corbyn will be an even better helper than Michael Foot was to the Tory cause. It’s you’re own fault, nobody else you support him you live with him but at least criticism lib dem policies rather than petty personality slurs.
"Totally" she is totally shite.
Which policies the skills wallet winner or the 30 trillion trees
It is difficult to know why you should want to play the caricature of a student trot in such a way that will repel any floating voters - but I guess that is another small benefit to the LDs.
Hence forth Tory Swinson is renamed super Jo as she has managed to halve LD VI in a couple of months.
Long may she reign.
Well at least she doesn't help the tories as much as corbyn whch i is the single reason Johnson is heading for a majority.
Why are LDs down from 22 to 12?
Nothing to do with Super Jo or Jezza?
Totally due to the sheer horror that many people feel about corbyn getting into power, you should really question why you want to lose elections and fail the people you pretend to want to help because losing with a true socialist platform is more important than actually changing people’s lives. Labour sub 200 big Tory majority all because of corbyn and his clique.
So since October LD down from 22 to 12 and its all Corbyns fault. At least your consistent.
Your leader is a voter repellent hypocritical lightweight you should get rid and get Layla in.
No way LD vote would be nose diving faster than a Beoing 737 Max without Super Jo.
You would find any lib dem leader repellent because you see them trying to occupy your entitled space in the ‘any but Tory vote’ spectrum and the bastards get elected to local councils depriving you of your god given right to anoint the next labour candidate. The tories believe the same, the duopoly is all they want to preserve but it will be what it will be. I predict that corbyn will be an even better helper than Michael Foot was to the Tory cause. It’s you’re own fault, nobody else you support him you live with him but at least criticism lib dem policies rather than petty personality slurs.
"Totally" she is totally shite.
Which policies the skills wallet winner or the 30 trillion trees
It is difficult to know why you should want to play the caricature of a student trot in such a way that will repel any floating voters - but I guess that is another small benefit to the LDs.
Although I think Johnson running away from one of the debates isn't a great idea.
Corbyn will do well (be seen widely to have "won") and it will make absolutely no difference whatsoever.
Yes. I would imagine that any performance other than bursting into flames in the middle of the stage will be seen as a victory for Corbyn, so low are expectations.
On the other hand, what proportion of the electorate will be paying attention, and how many of those will be undecided? Not many and even fewer, I would suspect.
Being a pessimist I'm still concerned by the possibility of Labour catching up as in 2017, but one has to remember at this point that, looking back through electoral history, campaigns often make little difference to the outcome. If most voters have already made up their minds then the partial stand-down of the Brexit Party and a modest squeeze of the Lib Dem vote share may be about as far as it goes between now and election day.
We shall, of course, find out in just over three weeks' time...
Hence forth Tory Swinson is renamed super Jo as she has managed to halve LD VI in a couple of months.
Long may she reign.
Well at least she doesn't help the tories as much as corbyn whch i is the single reason Johnson is heading for a majority.
Why are LDs down from 22 to 12?
Nothing to do with Super Jo or Jezza?
Totally due to the sheer horror that many people feel about corbyn getting into power, you should really question why you want to lose elections and fail the people you pretend to want to help because losing with a true socialist platform is more important than actually changing people’s lives. Labour sub 200 big Tory majority all because of corbyn and his clique.
So since October LD down from 22 to 12 and its all Corbyns fault. At least your consistent.
Your leader is a voter repellent hypocritical lightweight you should get rid and get Layla in.
No way LD vote would be nose diving faster than a Beoing 737 Max without Super Jo.
You would find any lib dem leader repellent because you see them trying to occupy your entitled space in the ‘any but Tory vote’ spectrum and the bastards get elected to local councils depriving you of your god given right to anoint the next labour candidate. The tories believe the same, the duopoly is all they want to preserve but it will be what it will be. I predict that corbyn will be an even better helper than Michael Foot was to the Tory cause. It’s you’re own fault, nobody else you support him you live with him but at least criticism lib dem policies rather than petty personality slurs.
"Totally" she is totally shite.
Which policies the skills wallet winner or the 30 trillion trees
It is difficult to know why you should want to play the caricature of a student trot in such a way that will repel any floating voters - but I guess that is another small benefit to the LDs.
At his best, Boris is showbiz, brings sparkle, is genuinely funny and is someone everyone wants to be friends with. At his worst he is a gallumphing, plodding, inarticulate bully.
At his best, Corbs is a hugely effective advocate of those in need of help and fighter against injustice; at his worst he is shouty, small-minded, and bigoted.
My Lib Dem council (since May this year) have just bunged a gumpf newsletter through my door, which I’m sure I’ve paid for, saying they’ve declared a climate emergency on our behalf. They are now imploring us all to ‘eat less meat’.
I’m going to eat more meat.
I may end up posting pork chops through their letterbox.
I'm gonna vote LD tactically here but Swinson is awful, she does this annoying head nodding thing that drives me mad
Swinson needed a good year plus in the role as leader. This election came far too soon.
Actually, Cable hung on far too long as Leader to give her a chance to grow into the requirements of the post. Not helped by making a fundamental error in going too far on Brexit. They should have mirrored Labour's (admittedly shite) position and then positioned themselves as the Not Bat-shit Crazy Left.
Hence forth Tory Swinson is renamed super Jo as she has managed to halve LD VI in a couple of months.
Long may she reign.
Well at least she doesn't help the tories as much as corbyn whch i is the single reason Johnson is heading for a majority.
Why are LDs down from 22 to 12?
Nothing to do with Super Jo or Jezza?
Totally due to the sheer horror that many people feel about corbyn getting into power, you should really question why you want to lose elections and fail the people you pretend to want to help because losing with a true socialist platform is more important than actually changing people’s lives. Labour sub 200 big Tory majority all because of corbyn and his clique.
So since October LD down from 22 to 12 and its all Corbyns fault. At least your consistent.
Your leader is a voter repellent hypocritical lightweight you should get rid and get Layla in.
No way LD vote would be nose diving faster than a Beoing 737 Max without Super Jo.
You would find any lib dem leader repellent because you see them trying to occupy your entitled space in the ‘any but Tory vote’ spectrum and the bastards get elected to local councils depriving you of your god given right to anoint the next labour candidate. The tories believe the same, the duopoly is all they want to preserve but it will be what it will be. I predict that corbyn will be an even better helper than Michael Foot was to the Tory cause. It’s you’re own fault, nobody else you support him you live with him but at least criticism lib dem policies rather than petty personality slurs.
"Totally" she is totally shite.
Which policies the skills wallet winner or the 30 trillion trees
It is difficult to know why you should want to play the caricature of a student trot in such a way that will repel any floating voters - but I guess that is another small benefit to the LDs.
It's not working so far though is it?
Every little helps and we are in your debt.
You think Super Jo is good?
Tou are in for a shock on the 12th.
I offered no opinion on Swinson so I presume this was just another extension of your student trot persona - misrepresentation. However, since you ask, I prefer her to Corbyn and Johnson. Although, tbf, I would prefer an outbreak of amoebic dysentry to either of them.
Inevitable given he's less successful than George Graham and Juande Ramos
He's still not won a trophy ... what this means for Spurs, it's not good for sure, Jezza won't nationalise us as he's a poxy gooner!! So that's something positive.
Not abolishing private schools, which surprises me.
Their proposals for the former are meaningless drivel. Leaving aside the fact Gove promised something similar in 2010 (I wonder how that went?) what they are proposing is either local authority control or effectively academy chain control. Both have been utterly disastrous. They are a recipe fo cronyism, incompetence and waste.
Even if their proposals on private education and charitable status are legal and practical, as I have repeatedly pointed out VAT on school fees would close most private schools. So while they have the right idea in terms of cutting class sizes to 20, the money they have put aside for it is laughably inadequate. £12 billion a year would be none too much.
So - just to be clear - they’re proposing zero carbon transport and proposing to eliminate the only realistic way of achieving it? They want to build lots of railway lines, just not the only one that will make a big difference?
A read through and it’s a bunch of unicorn policies put forward by a bunch of self righteous but dimwitted authoritarians. It’s like Labour’s policy offering but with a better colour scheme and less violence.
Weird observation: Both Johnson and Corbyn were trying to look confident but not quite smug in the first shot. Johnson's mouth naturally curves up into a not quite cheeky grin, whereas Corbyn's naturally curves down into a not quite smug smirk.
Feel your pain, we're lucky FSG back Klopp in the transfer market.
Lose the Champions League final? Spend nearly £180 million that summer to win it the next year.
Have a struggling defence? Break the world record transfer fee for a GK and Centre back in the space of 6 months.
Levy should take note.
No transfers for 2 transfer windows, muck up the contracts of your entire starting back 4 and key central midfielder. Pay under the market rate to the whole squad.
Corbyn offering dither and delay will be a big theme from Boris, I am sure. It's not a terrible line, but Corbyn will need to hit back on the government incompetence.
Brexit will take a long time, it's true, but given Corbyn is offering a referendum which might also see us Brexit, I don't see how he can hit Boris for that point since his own plan might do the same.
Not abolishing private schools, which surprises me.
Their proposals for the former are meaningless drivel. Leaving aside the fact Gove promised something similar in 2010 (I wonder how that went?) what they are proposing is either local authority control or effectively academy chain control. Both have been utterly disastrous. They are a recipe fo cronyism, incompetence and waste.
Even if their proposals on private education and charitable status are legal and practical, as I have repeatedly pointed out VAT on school fees would close most private schools. So while they have the right idea in terms of cutting class sizes to 20, the money they have put aside for it is laughably inadequate. £12 billion a year would be none too much.
So - just to be clear - they’re proposing zero carbon transport and proposing to eliminate the only realistic way of achieving it? They want to build lots of railway lines, just not the only one that will make a big difference?
A read through and it’s a bunch of unicorn policies put forward by a bunch of self righteous but dimwitted authoritarians. It’s like Labour’s policy offering but with a better colour scheme and less violence.
Comments
Which policies the skills wallet winner or the 30 trillion trees
https://twitter.com/piersmorgan/status/1196876197097091074
Also in YouGov latest poll, youth intention up significantly. One to watch I think.
On the other hand, what proportion of the electorate will be paying attention, and how many of those will be undecided? Not many and even fewer, I would suspect.
Being a pessimist I'm still concerned by the possibility of Labour catching up as in 2017, but one has to remember at this point that, looking back through electoral history, campaigns often make little difference to the outcome. If most voters have already made up their minds then the partial stand-down of the Brexit Party and a modest squeeze of the Lib Dem vote share may be about as far as it goes between now and election day.
We shall, of course, find out in just over three weeks' time...
Lose the Champions League final? Spend nearly £180 million that summer to win it the next year.
Have a struggling defence? Break the world record transfer fee for a GK and Centre back in the space of 6 months.
Levy should take note.
Tou are in for a shock on the 12th.
At his best, Corbs is a hugely effective advocate of those in need of help and fighter against injustice; at his worst he is shouty, small-minded, and bigoted.
Which ones will turn up tonight?
I’m going to eat more meat.
I may end up posting pork chops through their letterbox.
Actually, Cable hung on far too long as Leader to give her a chance to grow into the requirements of the post. Not helped by making a fundamental error in going too far on Brexit. They should have mirrored Labour's (admittedly shite) position and then positioned themselves as the Not Bat-shit Crazy Left.
Even if their proposals on private education and charitable status are legal and practical, as I have repeatedly pointed out VAT on school fees would close most private schools. So while they have the right idea in terms of cutting class sizes to 20, the money they have put aside for it is laughably inadequate. £12 billion a year would be none too much. So - just to be clear - they’re proposing zero carbon transport and proposing to eliminate the only realistic way of achieving it? They want to build lots of railway lines, just not the only one that will make a big difference?
A read through and it’s a bunch of unicorn policies put forward by a bunch of self righteous but dimwitted authoritarians. It’s like Labour’s policy offering but with a better colour scheme and less violence.
Anyway... Poch.... sniff.
Battle lines drawn.
Honestly, can he not remember more than 3 words at a time?
Take a bow Mr Levy.
JEREMY: That's not up to me
And the grave gets dug deeper.
Corbyn can't say whether he will campaign for Leave or Remain in JezRef.
Little Wonky!