Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The number of Tory MPs elected on December 12th will determine

12357

Comments

  • nichomar said:

    So why are you voting for the possibility that it happens? Corbyn is not going to win
    I will not even chance it
  • stodgestodge Posts: 14,389



    We have no idea how that would work out and I have only put it in there to alert posters that no deal has not gone away post a 31st January majority conservative government

    Yes, absolutely.

    Many have warned that Johnson (perhaps as part of the pact with Farage) will play along with trade negotiations next year and then leave at the end of 2020 without a Deal to WTO rules thereby allowing him the "luxury" of this hard-headed nonsense.

    Back in the summer you were vehemently opposed to No Deal (as were many Conservatives back then) but you all seem to have fallen hook, line and sinker for the Johnson/Cummings nonsense.

    If he gets a big majority, do you think Johnson will listen to anyone? His sheep in the Commons will do as they are told and if that means leaving without a trade deal this time next year so be it.

    When of course anyone tries to argue this the Conservative response is usually to wibble on about Corbyn, Venezuela and Marxism rather than to address the point.


  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,084

    With students’ consent, the service collects essential information from the university (such as date of birth and full name) and the student (National Insurance number) and automatically transfers it to the relevant, participating electoral registrars at local authorities, reducing the effort and expense it would take for universities and colleges to work with multiple electoral registrars across the UK.

    https://www.jisc.ac.uk/news/student-voter-registration-service-gains-its-1000th-sign-up-01-oct-2019
    Wow. What a bizarre system. What was the DfE smoking when they came up with this?
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 30,951

    There are so many reasonable criticisms of Corbyn but quite frankly I switch off when I hear he's a Marxist Communist spy who is simultaenously so fucking useless he can't take a view on anything.

    Milliband was apparently a Communist, I'm sure Brown was called a Communist as well.

    It just gets tiring after a while - and quite frankly the Tories have been doing their best to screw up the country over the last 9 years.
    Until Johnson publishes the Report on Russian involvement in UK elections he has no business calling anyone else pro-Russian. I find it fascinating that Johnson gets clean away with partying in Italy with former KGB operatives whilst Foreign Secretary.
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    spudgfsh said:

    There are 8 non-SNP seats on the map. 2 tories on the borders plus aberdeen. 4 LD (Orkney/Shetland, the bit at the top, 1 near glasgow and one near edinbrough) plus a labour one
    I can't add up. I got all those figure individually but made them make 7 not 8.

    That said, the Spectrum of possibilities where Con retain Aberdeen South but lose all but their bankers in the borders must be very, very slim.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,084

    Until Johnson publishes the Report on Russian involvement in UK elections he has no business calling anyone else pro-Russian. I find it fascinating that Johnson gets clean away with partying in Italy with former KGB operatives whilst Foreign Secretary.
    He was present, but he wasn't involved. He was banging some CIA chick on the other sofa when they were around.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 34,151

    Unis for as long as I can remember used to register people living in halls, but now standard practice seems to be just do everybody.
    I tried to vote in a local election while at university in about 1999 and was told my name wasn't on the register. I'd assumed it would be for some reason.
  • ydoethur said:

    He was present, but he wasn't involved. He was banging some CIA chick on the other sofa when they were around.
    You joke but Johnson will literally get away with anything whilst we have a corrupt press that is bought by Tory Party donors.

    I have absolutely no doubt whatsoever that Johnson is a deeply, deeply dodgy man.
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483

    My ancestors fought and died for thousands of years to bequeath me the vote. I'm not going to besmirch their memory by refusing to exercise it just because political parties are, almost without exception, led by liars and hypocrites.

    To be more serious, I'm probably going to vote Tory because decisive government with a working majority is, all things being equal, marginally better than anything else on offer.
    It honestly isn’t it won’t solve anything other than brexit which will bring more problems than it solves. They have thrown good economic management out of the window and have the worst of the nasty party on cabinet. Corbyn is marginally worse but it is not a binary choice, vote for a brake on idiotic majority government.
  • stodge said:

    Yes, absolutely.

    Many have warned that Johnson (perhaps as part of the pact with Farage) will play along with trade negotiations next year and then leave at the end of 2020 without a Deal to WTO rules thereby allowing him the "luxury" of this hard-headed nonsense.

    Back in the summer you were vehemently opposed to No Deal (as were many Conservatives back then) but you all seem to have fallen hook, line and sinker for the Johnson/Cummings nonsense.

    If he gets a big majority, do you think Johnson will listen to anyone? His sheep in the Commons will do as they are told and if that means leaving without a trade deal this time next year so be it.

    When of course anyone tries to argue this the Conservative response is usually to wibble on about Corbyn, Venezuela and Marxism rather than to address the point.


    The problem lies in your last paragraph. Corbyn's policies are Venezeulan in concept and hence why I will vote for Boris as defeating Corbyn is far more important to me than Brexit
  • ozymandiasozymandias Posts: 1,503

    You joke but Johnson will literally get away with anything whilst we have a corrupt press that is bought by Tory Party donors.

    I have absolutely no doubt whatsoever that Johnson is a deeply, deeply dodgy man.
    That corrupt press will include the Mirror, Morning Star, Grainuad, Observer, i,
    , Evening Standard and Independent then?

  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 54,235
    Just watched several episodes of The Crown series 3.

    Episode 3, about Aberfan, is a remarkable piece of film-making. Extraordinarily powerful.

    (The portrayal of Harold Wilson is very fine.)
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,084
    edited November 2019

    You joke but Johnson will literally get away with anything whilst we have a corrupt press that is bought by Tory Party donors.

    I have absolutely no doubt whatsoever that Johnson is a deeply, deeply dodgy man.
    I was not joking. I was making an entirely serious point. The issue is not that Johnson is not a 'deeply, deeply dodgy man,' because he clearly is. The issue is that Corbyn is far worse. Which is both some achievement and deeply alarming.
  • MrEdMrEd Posts: 5,578
    Cheers Pulpstar, a very interesting piece.

    In hindsight, it seems like every election (at least in recent times) has one overriding, usually not stated, theme that determines the results.

    In 2005, it was that the people wanted to send Tony Blair a message they were becoming dissatisfied but to keep him in power = reduced majority;

    In 2010, people didn't like Brown and were tired of Labour but didn't trust the Conservatives nor David Cameron enough to give them a majority = hung Parliament

    In 2015, it was that David Cameron had done just enough to earn people's trust but - more importantly - they didn't see Ed Milliband as PM material = Tory majority

    In 2017, it was that people didn't want Theresa May to have a majority given the more they saw (or didn't) of her, the more they distrusted her = hung Parliament.

    What is the theme for this election? Brexit is the obvious one but, actually, I think the key theme running through this is "Do you want Corbyn as PM?" If that is right, then do not expect many LD gains in Tory surburbia (as Tory remainers fear for their wealth under a Corbyn government) and, more to the point, expect a Tory landslide as fear of Corbyn proves the motivating factor of this election.
  • Alphabet_SoupAlphabet_Soup Posts: 3,565
    edited November 2019
    nichomar said:

    It honestly isn’t it won’t solve anything other than brexit which will bring more problems than it solves. They have thrown good economic management out of the window and have the worst of the nasty party on cabinet. Corbyn is marginally worse but it is not a binary choice, vote for a brake on idiotic majority government.
    We dodged a bullet in 2010 because it was possible to cobble a coalition together which was, in my opinion, a very good government. But the LDs have made it clear (and why wouldn't they?) that this will not happen again.
  • stodgestodge Posts: 14,389


    The problem lies in your last paragraph. Corbyn's policies are Venezeulan in concept and hence why I will vote for Boris as defeating Corbyn is far more important to me than Brexit

    While I acknowledge the disaster Corbyn would be to the economy and the country, that does not, in my view, condone handing a large majority and effectively untrammelled power to Boris Johnson for five years.

    If the only two reasons for voting Conservative are a) getting Brexit done and b) stopping Corbyn, these can be accomplished in a year.

    What then? I have very little confidence in Johnson and those surrounding him and I very much doubt they will make this country a better place for the vast majority in which to live.

    My hope is IF Boris gets his majority, by 2024 there will be a credible viable alternative Government on offer so we can send him and his ideas packing.

    I look forward to you joining me in supporting that credible alternative.
  • nunu2nunu2 Posts: 1,453
    edited November 2019

    We should abolish fees for people doing degrees which benefit the country and humanity.

    So those who read the medicines, STEM, history, and law don't have to pay a fee.
    You can qualify as a lawyer without law as your first degree though........
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    stodge said:

    While I acknowledge the disaster Corbyn would be to the economy and the country, that does not, in my view, condone handing a large majority and effectively untrammelled power to Boris Johnson for five years.

    If the only two reasons for voting Conservative are a) getting Brexit done and b) stopping Corbyn, these can be accomplished in a year.

    What then? I have very little confidence in Johnson and those surrounding him and I very much doubt they will make this country a better place for the vast majority in which to live.

    My hope is IF Boris gets his majority, by 2024 there will be a credible viable alternative Government on offer so we can send him and his ideas packing.

    I look forward to you joining me in supporting that credible alternative.
    At times I thought I was on my own in my view that both alternatives of corbyn and Johnson were unacceptable.
  • nunu2nunu2 Posts: 1,453
    kle4 said:

    How could someone running in such a high profile race, where race will be a factor, be so careless?
    Endorsements from Obama's country of birth......?
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,314
    nunu2 said:
    Weighting in polls is done all the time. The unweighted figures are a load of garbage given sampling effects.
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483

    We dodged a bullet in 2010 because it was possible to cobble a coalition together which was, in my opinion, a very good government. But the LDs have made it clear (and why wouldn't they?) that this will not happen again.
    Let the largest party govern with a minority they can’t do any harm, you actually don’t need a majority government just a functioning civil service.
  • spudgfshspudgfsh Posts: 1,562
    nichomar said:

    At times I thought I was on my own in my view that both alternatives of corbyn and Johnson were unacceptable.
    There's always Jo Swinson...
  • nunu2nunu2 Posts: 1,453
    RobD said:

    Weighting in polls is done all the time. The unweighted figures are a load of garbage given sampling effects.
    But upweighting one party by 47%?
  • nunu2 said:

    You can qualify as a lawyer without law as your first degree though........
    Indeed.

    But a law based degree sets you up for life with the skills you learn.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 30,951
    ydoethur said:

    He was present, but he wasn't involved. He was banging some CIA chick on the other sofa when they were around.
    Don't forget he never had intimate relations with Ms. Arcuri, which is why it was fine that she got a four figure handout from the Mayor's Fund. I think, if Boris simply forgets something has happened we can take his word for it and move on.
  • ozymandiasozymandias Posts: 1,503

    Don't forget he never had intimate relations with Ms. Arcuri, which is why it was fine that she got a four figure handout from the Mayor's Fund. I think, if Boris simply forgets something has happened we can take his word for it and move on.
    Worked for Corbyn.
  • Just watched several episodes of The Crown series 3.

    Episode 3, about Aberfan, is a remarkable piece of film-making. Extraordinarily powerful.

    (The portrayal of Harold Wilson is very fine.)

    Aberfan is as raw to us today as it was on the 21st October 1966. Just 8 days later on the 29th October our eldest son was born here in North Wales and the emotions were highly charged. The mass burials of 81 of the children had taken place on the 27th October and the Queen and Prince Philip visited Aberfan on the day he was born
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,314
    nunu2 said:

    But upweighting one party by 47%?
    Not sure how common that magnitude is, but I don't think any company uses raw numbers like that person on twitter wants them to do.
  • Re Deltapoll, do you have the figures to hand for turnout by age group?

    I wonder if their results are similarly weighted to Kantar's.
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483

    Come on mirror yes marginally popular Morning Star don’t be silly the rest unfortunately not read by anybody who wants their convictions challenged, when did the morning star have ant influence?
  • BluerBlueBluerBlue Posts: 521
    edited November 2019
    nichomar said:


    Well, my college JCR always carried a copy...
  • stodge said:

    While I acknowledge the disaster Corbyn would be to the economy and the country, that does not, in my view, condone handing a large majority and effectively untrammelled power to Boris Johnson for five years.

    If the only two reasons for voting Conservative are a) getting Brexit done and b) stopping Corbyn, these can be accomplished in a year.

    What then? I have very little confidence in Johnson and those surrounding him and I very much doubt they will make this country a better place for the vast majority in which to live.

    My hope is IF Boris gets his majority, by 2024 there will be a credible viable alternative Government on offer so we can send him and his ideas packing.

    I look forward to you joining me in supporting that credible alternative.
    The problem is you cannot control a majority, you can only vote positively to stop Corbyn

    I think Boris may actually follow quite a liberal programme but how I will vote in 5 years time I could not say, and at my age I may not be involved !!!!
  • Well I think we have the reasons for the massive disparity in leads then, it's almost entirely down to turnout.

    Somebody is going to end up with major egg on their face
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    spudgfsh said:

    There's always Jo Swinson...
    No problem then you have found a solution
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,084
    nichomar said:

    At times I thought I was on my own in my view that both alternatives of corbyn and Johnson were unacceptable.
    And I thought you read every word of my posts :disappointed:
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,314

    Well I think we have the reasons for the massive disparity in leads then, it's almost entirely down to turnout.

    Somebody is going to end up with major egg on their face

    How'd you arrive at that conclusion without getting the turnout figures for the poll?
  • NeilVWNeilVW Posts: 738
    NeilVW said:

    I asked that very question of Mr Wells, and will report back his answer. If he doesn’t have it to hand, I’ll have to crank up the spreadsheet and estimate it myself.

    10,000-seat majority and under for any party is quite a wide spread of seats - about a 20-point lead assuming average turnout?
    Going back to this, I worked out that there are 283 seats in GB with a 2017 majority of under 10,000 (“marginals” for these purposes). The average Con lead over Lab in the 283 was 2.0 points. YouGov found a 20-point lead, suggesting a 9% swing in marginals (compared with about 7% overall). Among those certain to vote in these marginals, they found a 26% lead (a swing of 12%).

    For the record, the 283 seats are made up as follows:

    - 127 won by Con in 2017
    - 105 Lab
    - 12 LD
    - 4 PC
    - 35 SNP
  • BluerBlueBluerBlue Posts: 521
    edited November 2019

    Well I think we have the reasons for the massive disparity in leads then, it's almost entirely down to turnout.

    Somebody is going to end up with major egg on their face

    Which age group can you rely upon to either get their postal vote sorted in plenty of time or make it to the polling station in the depths of winter?
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 34,151
    edited November 2019
    nunu2 said:
    It sounds like someone who doesn't know what they're talking about, and is criticising the polls because they don't like what they're showing at present.
  • ozymandiasozymandias Posts: 1,503
    RobD said:

    How'd you arrive at that conclusion without getting the turnout figures for the poll?
    RobD said:

    How'd you arrive at that conclusion without getting the turnout figures for the poll?
    He's a Labour ramper.
  • geoffwgeoffw Posts: 8,976

    Just watched several episodes of The Crown series 3.

    Episode 3, about Aberfan, is a remarkable piece of film-making. Extraordinarily powerful.

    (The portrayal of Harold Wilson is very fine.)

    Only saw episode 1. Olivia Coleman is a great actress but didn't convince me as EIIR. Wilson good, yes, but Blunt not much of a likeness. However the period is really well captured.
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    ydoethur said:

    And I thought you read every word of my posts :disappointed:
    To the point that I know you are seriously upset that you can’t vote for who you want because of the unite alliance, yes but I’m a sad pensioner with little else to do!
  • ArthurArthur Posts: 63

    We should abolish fees for people doing degrees which benefit the country and humanity.

    So those who read the medicines, STEM, history, and law don't have to pay a fee.
    Medicine and law should be taught alongside motorcycle maintenance at specialised trade schools. They aren't academic subjects. Academia should be for those who love learning. There's a big difference between work training and academic study.

  • AndrewAndrew Posts: 2,900
    edited November 2019
    For all the headline numbers, one thing seems really static: Corbyn's approval numbers. He's stuck around net -42/-43, and it's not shifting at all.

    That would suggest an general election gap in the 12/13% ballpark, which is what poll aggregates seem to be trending towards.
  • He's a Labour ramper.
    Yup bought and paid for by Jeremy Corbyn himself.
  • geoffw said:

    Only saw episode 1. Olivia Coleman is a great actress but didn't convince me as EIIR. Wilson good, yes, but Blunt not much of a likeness. However the period is really well captured.
    Jason Watkins is really exceptional as Wilson, brilliant casting. The Aberfan episode is incredible, a tough watch but superb.

    I'm at the point where Dickie Mountbatten (Charles Dance) is involved in the plot against Wilson, and it is just astonishingly well acted.
  • Andrew said:

    For all the headline numbers, one thing seems really static: Corbyn's approval numbers. He's stuck around net -42/-43, and it's not shifting at all.

    That's a really important spot, thanks. I don't suppose you checked if Boris' were fluctuating at the same time? Yes, I'm lazy :wink:
  • Regarding Deltapoll, I thought I posted the data tables this morning.

    Here you go again.

    http://www.deltapoll.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Deltapoll-MoS191116.pdf
  • ozymandiasozymandias Posts: 1,503

    Yup bought and paid for by Jeremy Corbyn himself.
    I doubt he's that clever.
  • I doubt he's that clever.
    Nah he gets the Russians to do it.
  • BluerBlue said:

    That's a really important spot, thanks. I don't suppose you checked if Boris' were fluctuating at the same time? Yes, I'm lazy :wink:
    Yes they went briefly negative and now he's back up to positive again.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,314

    Regarding Deltapoll, I thought I posted the data tables this morning.

    Here you go again.

    http://www.deltapoll.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Deltapoll-MoS191116.pdf

    As far as I can tell they don't have turnout figures listed.
  • ozymandiasozymandias Posts: 1,503

    Nah he gets the Russians to do it.
    Russians? They're capitalist now - didn't you know?
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 34,151
  • Nah he gets the Russians to do it.
    Probably the same Russians he wanted to send the Novichok sample to for them to check...
  • Russians? They're capitalist now - didn't you know?
    Is that right?

    I'll let Corbyn know, thanks for your feedback
  • nichomar said:

    Let the largest party govern with a minority they can’t do any harm, you actually don’t need a majority government just a functioning civil service.
    All too often a government has to take unpopular decisions. The CS won't do it for them. Minority government is just a recipe for temporisation. We're already suffering from this on multiple fronts.
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    Arthur said:

    Medicine and law should be taught alongside motorcycle maintenance at specialised trade schools. They aren't academic subjects. Academia should be for those who love learning. There's a big difference between work training and academic study.

    Well that is a very interesting theory! I suspect you may be in a minority on this but I suggest you consider that until you understand the basics you can’t push back the boundary’s of science and without that we would be in a Johnson Greek classical dark age arguing if the earth was flat and if the sun moved round the earth.
  • RobD said:

    As far as I can tell they don't have turnout figures listed.
    Thought they weighted based on reported likelihood to vote - which is in there? V002?
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483

    All too often a government has to take unpopular decisions. The CS won't do it for them. Minority government is just a recipe for temporisation. We're already suffering from this on multiple fronts.
    It’s been quite stable in Spain apart from Catalonia with no majority for four years.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,314

    Thought they weighted based on reported likelihood to vote - which is in there? V002?
    You are talking about the Deltapoll PDF?
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,314
    Both words legally meaningless, so why fuss about it :p
  • The eco-fascists will be chaining themselves to Jezza fence again.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 30,951
    Arthur said:

    Medicine and law should be taught alongside motorcycle maintenance at specialised trade schools. They aren't academic subjects. Academia should be for those who love learning. There's a big difference between work training and academic study.

    I am not sure an NVQ level 4 in brain surgery really works. Observational assessment whilst the candidate demonstrates competence, or lack of it, in a real workplace learning situation may have a drawback or two.
  • ozymandiasozymandias Posts: 1,503
    nichomar said:

    We of science and without that we would be in a Johnson Greek classical dark age arguing if the earth was flat and if the sun moved round the earth.
    nichomar said:

    Well that is a very interesting theory! I suspect you may be in a minority on this but I suggest you consider that until you understand the basics you can’t push back the boundary’s of science and without that we would be in a Johnson Greek classical dark age arguing if the earth was flat and if the sun moved round the earth.
    Of course the Greeks calculated the Earth was in fact round.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/history/ancient-greeks-proved-earth-round-eratosthenes-alexandria-syene-summer-solstice-a8131376.html
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 54,235

    Aberfan is as raw to us today as it was on the 21st October 1966. Just 8 days later on the 29th October our eldest son was born here in North Wales and the emotions were highly charged. The mass burials of 81 of the children had taken place on the 27th October and the Queen and Prince Philip visited Aberfan on the day he was born
    Might be an especially tough watch for you then.

    That line of children's coffins extending forever is as visceral as it gets.
  • RobD said:

    You are talking about the Deltapoll PDF?
    I am yes.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,084

    Of course the Greeks calculated the Earth was in fact round.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/history/ancient-greeks-proved-earth-round-eratosthenes-alexandria-syene-summer-solstice-a8131376.html
    Nobody believed the earth was flat. Nada. Zero. Zilch. Everyone knew it was spherical, if only from observation of the horizon. Aquinas based whole theories on this.

    The flat earth myth was invented by Washington Irving in his biography of Columbus as an anti-Catholic polemic, and unfortunately the popular success of this work of mostly fiction means it has stuck.
  • Andy_JS said:
    This week is going to be crucial. If that lead extends further, Labour is in trouble
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,084
    Andy_JS said:

    It sounds like someone who doesn't know what they're talking about, and is criticising the polls because they don't like what they're showing at present.
    I think however we should remember in 2017 the unweighted samples were far closer to the result than the ones that went through weighting. That may of course have been a coincidence, or it may be pollsters are overthinking their past failures.
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    edited November 2019

    Of course the Greeks calculated the Earth was in fact round.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/history/ancient-greeks-proved-earth-round-eratosthenes-alexandria-syene-summer-solstice-a8131376.html
    Took a while to catch on though I just thought that medicine and motor cycle maintenance was an odd comparison. In reality of course routine diagnosis of both will be solved by good AI the problem comes when we can’t make the next leap forward
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,314

    I am yes.
    What page are they listed on? I think I went through every page and didn't see a question on likelihood to vote. V002 is the tab in the excel document containing turnout figures for Opinium, however.
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,767
    You can get rough feel for Deltapoll turnout from weighted numbers.

    18 to 24s (8 year cohort) - 175 people
    55 to 64s (10 year cohort) - 234 people

    So assumed turnout in 18 to 24s is a bit lower than 55 to 64s but not substantially lower.

    Numbers look very reasonable to me.
  • ozymandiasozymandias Posts: 1,503
    ydoethur said:

    Nobody believed the earth was flat. Nada. Zero. Zilch. Everyone knew it was spherical, if only from observation of the horizon. Aquinas based whole theories on this.

    The flat earth myth was invented by Washington Irving in his biography of Columbus as an anti-Catholic polemic, and unfortunately the popular success of this work of mostly fiction means it has stuck.
    That's actually really interesting - thanks. :smiley:
  • RobD said:

    What page are they listed on? I think I went through every page and didn't see a question on likelihood to vote. V002 is the tab in the excel document containing turnout figures for Opinium, however.
    I'm so sorry, I'm looking at completely the wrong pollster. I did have Opinium open and I've just checked again - you're quite right.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,314

    I'm so sorry, I'm looking at completely the wrong pollster. I did have Opinium open and I've just checked again - you're quite right.
    Up to our ears in polls these days.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 54,235

    This week is going to be crucial. If that lead extends further, Labour is in trouble
    Brexit still on a very high 8 though - that Tory lead is going to extend even if Labour have a campaigning week on par with the Tories.....
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 98,314
    RobD said:

    Up to our ears in polls these days.
    And yet you're never satisfied.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 34,151
    edited November 2019
    ydoethur said:

    I think however we should remember in 2017 the unweighted samples were far closer to the result than the ones that went through weighting. That may of course have been a coincidence, or it may be pollsters are overthinking their past failures.
    The polls have almost always been very accurate, including with the Conservative share in 2017. The only mistake they've made recently was slightly underestimating Labour in 2017 by around 4%, which was not good but not terrible either. There may have been a last-minute surge to Labour in 2017 which by definition would have been very difficult to capture, similar to the Conservatives in 1992.
  • maaarshmaaarsh Posts: 3,592

    This week is going to be crucial. If that lead extends further, Labour is in trouble
    Indeed, right now it's all going well - got the Tories right where they want them, but can't let this position slip.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 23,960
    edited November 2019
    nichomar said:

    Johnson’s majority makes no difference to the future relationship with the EU it is already defined, it will be significantly worse than our current arrangement but be heralded as a dramatic victory by our pathological liar and amoral PM. Then life can progress but by 31/6 next year is really stretch the bounds of possibility. Don’t forget the extension has to be requested by that date or in the words of Noel Edmonds it’s deal or no deal
    So, I paraphrase:

    @Big_G_NorthWales , 2019/09: "Boris is risking No Deal! I cannot approve that! I shall leave the party!"
    @Big_G_NorthWales , 2019/10: "Boris has signed a Deal! I applaud that! I shall rejoin the party!"
    @Big_G_NorthWales , 2019/11: "Boris is risking No Deal! I approve that! I shall not leave the party!"


  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,314
    kle4 said:

    And yet you're never satisfied.
    Did someone mention polls? :o
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 19,135
    ydoethur said:

    Nobody believed the earth was flat. Nada. Zero. Zilch. Everyone knew it was spherical, if only from observation of the horizon. Aquinas based whole theories on this.

    The flat earth myth was invented by Washington Irving in his biography of Columbus as an anti-Catholic polemic, and unfortunately the popular success of this work of mostly fiction means it has stuck.
    Right, so probably more people now (claim) to believe the world is flat then at any time in at least thousands of years.

    Thanks social media. Thanks a bunch.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,084

    That's actually really interesting - thanks. :smiley:
    The amusing irony of Columbus' voyage is that contrary to popular myth, he was wrong and everyone else was right. Nobody thought he would fall off the edge of the world, but they all said it was impossible for two caravels and a nao to carry sufficient supplies for a westbound voyage to Japan. Everyone would die of thirst before they got there. By contrast Columbus thought the world far smaller than it was, although it had been correctly measured by Erastothenes centuries before.

    And had he not crashed into America, the doomsayers would have been right. Indeed, even the first European transpacific voyage under Magellan ran so short of provisions they were forced to eat the leatherwork on the masts. But because America was there, he believed he was right, even though he was still completely wrong.

    Which is quite funny when you think about it.
  • nunu2nunu2 Posts: 1,453
    Andy_JS said:

    It sounds like someone who doesn't know what they're talking about, and is criticising the polls because they don't like what they're showing at present.
    He's Bernie/Corbyn supporter but his model was very spon on in 2017? So I dont know.

  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,084

    Right, so probably more people now (claim) to believe the world is flat then at any time in at least thousands of years.

    Thanks social media. Thanks a bunch.
    Probably. The only flat earther I actually know of for definite before the twentieth century was Paul Kruger, President of the Boer Republics.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 98,314
    ydoethur said:

    But because America was there, he believed he was right, even though he was still completely wrong.

    Which is quite funny when you think about it.
    Sure, but not when all their presidential candidates adopt that approach as policy.
  • nichomar said:

    Took a while to catch on though I just thought that medicine and motor cycle maintenance was an odd comparison. In reality of course routine diagnosis of both will be solved by good AI the problem comes when we can’t make the next leap forward

    Motorcycle maintenance is taught with Zen. Has been for years...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zen_and_the_Art_of_Motorcycle_Maintenance
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 19,135
    NeilVW said:

    Going back to this, I worked out that there are 283 seats in GB with a 2017 majority of under 10,000 (“marginals” for these purposes). The average Con lead over Lab in the 283 was 2.0 points. YouGov found a 20-point lead, suggesting a 9% swing in marginals (compared with about 7% overall). Among those certain to vote in these marginals, they found a 26% lead (a swing of 12%).

    For the record, the 283 seats are made up as follows:

    - 127 won by Con in 2017
    - 105 Lab
    - 12 LD
    - 4 PC
    - 35 SNP
    Fab work, thanks. No comfort for Labour, but suggests considering majorities upto 5,000 would be more useful.
  • Might be an especially tough watch for you then.

    That line of children's coffins extending forever is as visceral as it gets.
    My wife and I would find it hard. A neighbour painted a very large mural of each child's individual face rising to heaven and into Jesus's hand. It was just so emotional as he had obtained photos of all of them to produce the painting
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,084
    Andy_JS said:

    The polls have almost always been very accurate, including with the Conservative share in 2017. The only mistake they've made recently was slightly underestimating Labour in 2017 by around 4%, which was not good but not terrible either. There may have been a last-minute surge to Labour in 2017 which by definition would have been very difficult to capture, similar to the Conservatives in 1992.
    The point is the unweighted samples did pick up that surge, but the weighted ones discounted it.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,967
    viewcode said:

    So, I paraphrase:

    @Big_G_NorthWales , 2019/09: "Boris is risking No Deal! I cannot approve that! I shall leave the party!"
    @Big_G_NorthWales , 2019/10: "Boris has signed a Deal! I applaud that! I shall rejoin the party!"
    @Big_G_NorthWales , 2019/11: "Boris is risking No Deal! I approve that! I shall not leave the party!"


    Big_G wins this year’s drama queen award, and if he ends up voting for Bozo we at least know that we can safely ignore his future hysteria.
  • Just watched several episodes of The Crown series 3.

    Episode 3, about Aberfan, is a remarkable piece of film-making. Extraordinarily powerful.

    (The portrayal of Harold Wilson is very fine.)

    It's superb.

    We've just finished Aberfan and my wife has decided to sleep with the baby rather than me.
  • https://mobile.twitter.com/djjohnso/status/1196177362058125317

    Bit more from that bloke here.

    Take with as much salt as you wish, I'm only posting it for the purposes of information.
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    ydoethur said:

    Nobody believed the earth was flat. Nada. Zero. Zilch. Everyone knew it was spherical, if only from observation of the horizon. Aquinas based whole theories on this.

    The flat earth myth was invented by Washington Irving in his biography of Columbus as an anti-Catholic polemic, and unfortunately the popular success of this work of mostly fiction means it has stuck.
    My fault for picking a historical myth with an excess of historians on here, I’ll stick to the science of chocolate and postal measurement surveys in future. I do a good line on TBI early onset dementia but it’s not very interesting.
  • I'm so sorry, I'm looking at completely the wrong pollster. I did have Opinium open and I've just checked again - you're quite right.
    By the way, I agree with you that the obvious Corbyn play is to pledge to wipe out all student loans and debt.

    So I expect it too.
This discussion has been closed.