Based on current aggregate of polls by Britain elects, using Flavibles new system, under a Remain pact including Labour, Lab / LDs could form a government. Without Labour, (just LDs, Greens and Nats), Tories don't get a majority, but massively ahead of Labour.
This suggests tactical voting is going to be super important, and that any result based on national polls is going to be really difficult to predict. I can't find any constituency level polling atm, so maybe with some of that it would look different, but who knows.
Yes, that's exactly what I think.
On topic, I think Boris has played a blinder in purely political terms, by convincing us all including the ever-sceptical DUP that he was Mr No Deal, scaring us shitless with the prospect, and then offering a deal. A super-Remainer colleague who detests Boris says "I can't believe that I'm actually hoping he gets his deal to leave the EU through, but he's somehow persuaded me that it's the least bad alternative".
The question is whether he's resisted the temptation to say different things to different people. We'll know in a few days, so no need to speculate.
Nick there you are. You nailed it last time on numbers of Lab MPs likely to vote with govt on the WA. Assuming it comes back more or less as is, what would you think Lab numbers-wise now?
I hope that kind of answers your question Mr Topping
Yes! Thank you it did. I would say also that by voting Leave (xenophobic campaign aside although I think it is an important factor and don't begrudge people for whom it is the primary one) you ushered in the era whereby we have the chance of a Corbyn PM. Vote Remain and we would be berating George Osborne for sticking out his little finger while having a pint of Old Peculiar on one of his PM's meet the people tours.
I'm sorry to say but anyone but the out and out leavers (eg. @Richard_Tyndall et al) should hang their heads in shame at their behaviour by voting Leave without understanding (and I appreciate you are well-educated, etc, etc) that it was overwhelmingly likely that we would end up precisely where we are today. That is, having to make a series of least worst decisions with the spectre of Jeremy Corbyn on the one hand, and born-again ex-Tories like @HYUFD who accept any old shit the "Tory" party feeds them on the other.
Your fault.
Sozza, you seem a hugely nice, engaging and articulate person but this is on you.
Do I have buyers remorse? To an extent, yes. I guess i had too much faith in our politicians and systems to be able to sort this kind of thing out. Guess the UK has lost most of what made it such an important diplomatic and effective player over the last couple of centuries. We're just "standard" now. So my worry about EU democracy, or the lack of it, actually, falls away.
To close: If Labour can be returned by its decent rational members to its decent centre-left roots with a decent, economically literate Leader, my quid pro quo would be to vote Remain, with an active and vigourous approach to reform the EU. Make ourselves as influential and important to the EU as France or Germany. Mold it into what we want.
(And I'll put the EU flag back on my number-plate)
The evident enfeeblement of our politics and diplomacy is BECAUSE of our European Union membership. We haven't had to rely on ourselves, when talking about trade or frontiers or customs, for a long time. The muscle memory is almost gone, the sinews have atrophied. The same would apply to France or Germany if they were in a similar position.
So we face a steep learning curve. It will be good for us, in the end.
I hope that kind of answers your question Mr Topping
Yes! Thank you it did. I would say also that by voting Leave (xenophobic campaign aside although I think it is an important factor and don't begrudge people for whom it is the primary one) you ushered in the era whereby we have the chance of a Corbyn PM. Vote Remain and we would be berating George Osborne for sticking out his little finger while having a pint of Old Peculiar on one of his PM's meet the people tours.
I'm sorry to say but anyone but the out and out leavers (eg. @Richard_Tyndall et al) should hang their heads in shame at their behaviour by voting Leave without understanding (and I appreciate you are well-educated, etc, etc) that it was overwhelmingly likely that we would end up precisely where we are today. That is, having to make a series of least worst decisions with the spectre of Jeremy Corbyn on the one hand, and born-again ex-Tories like @HYUFD who accept any old shit the "Tory" party feeds them on the other.
Your fault.
Sozza, you seem a hugely nice, engaging and articulate person but this is on you.
Do I have buyers remorse? To an extent, yes. I guess i had too much faith in our politicians and systems to be able to sort this kind of thing out. Guess the UK has lost most of what made it such an important diplomatic and effective player over the last couple of centuries. We're just "standard" now. So my worry about EU democracy, or the lack of it, actually, falls away.
To close: If Labour can be returned by its decent rational members to its decent centre-left roots with a decent, economically literate Leader, my quid pro quo would be to vote Remain, with an active and vigourous approach to reform the EU. Make ourselves as influential and important to the EU as France or Germany. Mold it into what we want.
(And I'll put the EU flag back on my number-plate)
I hope that kind of answers your question Mr Topping
Yes! Thank you it did. I would say also that by voting Leave (xenophobic campaign aside although I think it is an important factor and don't begrudge people for whom it is the primary one) you ushered in the era whereby we have the chance of a Corbyn PM. Vote Remain and we would be berating George Osborne for sticking out his little finger while having a pint of Old Peculiar on one of his PM's meet the people tours.
I'm sorry to say but anyone but the out and out leavers (eg. @Richard_Tyndall et al) should hang their heads in shame at their behaviour by voting Leave without understanding (and I appreciate you are well-educated, etc, etc) that it was overwhelmingly likely that we would end up precisely where we are today. That is, having to make a series of least worst decisions with the spectre of Jeremy Corbyn on the one hand, and born-again ex-Tories like @HYUFD who accept any old shit the "Tory" party feeds them on the other.
Your fault.
Sozza, you seem a hugely nice, engaging and articulate person but this is on you.
Do I have buyers remorse? To an extent, yes. I guess i had too much faith in our politicians and systems to be able to sort this kind of thing out. Guess the UK has lost most of what made it such an important diplomatic and effective player over the last couple of centuries. We're just "standard" now. So my worry about EU democracy, or the lack of it, actually, falls away.
To close: If Labour can be returned by its decent rational members to its decent centre-left roots with a decent, economically literate Leader, my quid pro quo would be to vote Remain, with an active and vigourous approach to reform the EU. Make ourselves as influential and important to the EU as France or Germany. Mold it into what we want.
(And I'll put the EU flag back on my number-plate)
The evident enfeeblement of our politics and diplomacy is BECAUSE of our European Union membership. We haven't had to rely on ourselves, when talking about trade or frontiers or customs, for a long time. The muscle memory is almost gone, the sinews have atrophied. The same would apply to France or Germany if they were in a similar position.
So we face a steep learning curve. It will be good for us, in the end.
I hope that kind of answers your question Mr Topping
Yes! Thank you it did. I would say also that by voting Leave (xenophobic campaign aside although I think it is an important factor and don't begrudge people for whom it is the primary one) you ushered in the era whereby we have the chance of a Corbyn PM. Vote Remain and we would be berating George Osborne for sticking out his little finger while having a pint of Old Peculiar on one of his PM's meet the people tours.
I'm sorry to say but anyone but the out and out leavers (eg. @Richard_Tyndall et al) should hang their heads in shame at their behaviour by voting Leave without understanding (and I appreciate you are well-educated, etc, etc) that it was overwhelmingly likely that we would end up precisely where we are today. That is, having to make a series of least worst decisions with the spectre of Jeremy Corbyn on the one hand, and born-again ex-Tories like @HYUFD who accept any old shit the "Tory" party feeds them on the other.
Your fault.
Sozza, you seem a hugely nice, engaging and articulate person but this is on you.
Do I have buyers remorse? To an extent, yes. I guess i had too much faith in our politicians and systems to be able to sort this kind of thing out. Guess the UK has lost most of what made it such an important diplomatic and effective player over the last couple of centuries. We're just "standard" now. So my worry about EU democracy, or the lack of it, actually, falls away.
To close: If Labour can be returned by its decent rational members to its decent centre-left roots with a decent, economically literate Leader, my quid pro quo would be to vote Remain, with an active and vigourous approach to reform the EU. Make ourselves as influential and important to the EU as France or Germany. Mold it into what we want.
(And I'll put the EU flag back on my number-plate)
The evident enfeeblement of our politics and diplomacy is BECAUSE of our European Union membership. We haven't had to rely on ourselves, when talking about trade or frontiers or customs, for a long time. The muscle memory is almost gone, the sinews have atrophied. The same would apply to France or Germany if they were in a similar position.
So we face a steep learning curve. It will be good for us, in the end.
By "we" do you mean Cornwall?
The male modelling community. We're being asked to do Blue Steel, and we've almost forgotten.
I`ve long thought that the best way to "dishonour" the 2016 Referndum result will come when leavers themselves say they have changed their minds. I believe that many have buyer`s remorse but are reluctant to admit it.
I wonder whether we are at last getting to the stage where sufficient leavers (in number and profile (eg Peter Oborne)) that admit that they have made a mistake will provide the escape hatch from this dreadful state of affairs.
The best thing about a deal were it to happen would be wasting Cherry and Maughams time on their coup in the courts jaunt Although any deal must get past the Gina Miller veto of course
I hope that kind of answers your question Mr Topping
Yes! Thank you it did. I would say also that by voting Leave (xenophobic campaign aside although I think it is an important factor and don't begrudge people for whom it is the primary one) you ushered in the era whereby we have the chance of a Corbyn PM. Vote Remain and we would be berating George Osborne for sticking out his little finger while having a pint of Old Peculiar on one of his PM's meet the people tours.
I'm sorry to say but anyone but the out and out leavers (eg. @Richard_Tyndall et al) should hang their heads in shame at their behaviour by voting Leave without understanding (and I appreciate you are well-educated, etc, etc) that it was overwhelmingly likely that we would end up precisely where we are today. That is, having to make a series of least worst decisions with the spectre of Jeremy Corbyn on the one hand, and born-again ex-Tories like @HYUFD who accept any old shit the "Tory" party feeds them on the other.
Your fault.
Sozza, you seem a hugely nice, engaging and articulate person but this is on you.
Do I have buyers remorse? To an extent, yes. I guess i had too much faith in our politicians and systems to be able to sort this kind of thing out. Guess the UK has lost most of what made it such an important diplomatic and effective player over the last couple of centuries. We're just "standard" now. So my worry about EU democracy, or the lack of it, actually, falls away.
To close: If Labour can be returned by its decent rational members to its decent centre-left roots with a decent, economically literate Leader, my quid pro quo would be to vote Remain, with an active and vigourous approach to reform the EU. Make ourselves as influential and important to the EU as France or Germany. Mold it into what we want.
(And I'll put the EU flag back on my number-plate)
The evident enfeeblement of our politics and diplomacy is BECAUSE of our European Union membership. We haven't had to rely on ourselves, when talking about trade or frontiers or customs, for a long time. The muscle memory is almost gone, the sinews have atrophied. The same would apply to France or Germany if they were in a similar position.
So we face a steep learning curve. It will be good for us, in the end.
By "we" do you mean Cornwall?
The male modelling community. We're being asked to do Blue Steel, and we've almost forgotten.
She's miles better than Hillary, and she doesn't have the dodgy baggage. She's also extremely well organised - I don't think she'll make the arrogant blunders that Hillary made in her campaign.
The fiasco of post-referendum negotiations is all directly attributable to the conduct of the Leave campaign. Leavers professing astonishment and dismay at how it has turned out no doubt are astonished when Santa Claus pulls off his beard.
I hope that kind of answers your question Mr Topping
Yes! Thank you it did. I would say also that by voting Leave (xenophobic campaign aside although I think it is an important factor and don't begrudge people for whom it is the primary one) you ushered in the era whereby we have the chance of a Corbyn PM. Vote Remain and we would be berating George Osborne for sticking out his little finger while having a pint of Old Peculiar on one of his PM's meet the people tours.
I'm sorry to say but anyone but the out and out leavers (eg. @Richard_Tyndall et al) should hang their heads in shame at their behaviour by voting Leave without understanding (and I appreciate you are well-educated, etc, etc) that it was overwhelmingly likely that we would end up precisely where we are today. That is, having to make a series of least worst decisions with the spectre of Jeremy Corbyn on the one hand, and born-again ex-Tories like @HYUFD who accept any old shit the "Tory" party feeds them on the other.
Your fault.
Sozza, you seem a hugely nice, engaging and articulate person but this is on you.
Do I have buyers remorse? To an extent, yes. I guess i had too much faith in our politicians and systems to be able to sort this kind of thing out. Guess the UK has lost most of what made it such an important diplomatic and effective player over the last couple of centuries. We're just "standard" now. So my worry about EU democracy, or the lack of it, actually, falls away.
To close: If Labour can be returned by its decent rational members to its decent centre-left roots with a decent, economically literate Leader, my quid pro quo would be to vote Remain, with an active and vigourous approach to reform the EU. Make ourselves as influential and important to the EU as France or Germany. Mold it into what we want.
(And I'll put the EU flag back on my number-plate)
Mold in that spelling is perhaps not what you were desiring.....
I hope that kind of answers your question Mr Topping
Yes! Thank you it did. I would say also that by voting Leave (xenophobic campaign aside although I think it is an important factor and don't begrudge people for whom it is the primary one) you ushered in the era whereby we have the chance of a Corbyn PM. Vote Remain and we would be berating George Osborne for sticking out his little finger while having a pint of Old Peculiar on one of his PM's meet the people tours.
I'm sorry to say but anyone but the out and out leavers (eg. @Richard_Tyndall et al) should hang their heads in shame at their behaviour by voting Leave without understanding (and I appreciate you are well-educated, etc, etc) that it was overwhelmingly likely that we would end up precisely where we are today. That is, having to make a series of least worst decisions with the spectre of Jeremy Corbyn on the one hand, and born-again ex-Tories like @HYUFD who accept any old shit the "Tory" party feeds them on the other.
Your fault.
Sozza, you seem a hugely nice, engaging and articulate person but this is on you.
Corbyn could have beaten Osborne after 9 years of austerity with no pro Brexit coalition behind the Tories to give a chance of a 4th term and with Farage and UKIP still up in the polls
Speaking of which what are the bets Becky vs Coleen - which is the leaver and which is the remainer?
I would put Coleen as the remainer and Vardy as the leaver.
Quite possibly. Merseyside was pretty solidly Remain.
Quite apart from the #Wagathachristie element, the fight is an interesting insight into British class structure. The original generation of 2006 Wags regard Rebekah Vardy as a lower class upstart wannabee. That is the root of what has transpired.
That's funny! Coleen lives in Prestbury. Couldn't be much further removed from Merseyside.
"You can take the girl out of Scouserville ... "
It would be a bit of a squeeze getting this into Upper Parliament St
I hope that kind of answers your question Mr Topping
Yes! Thank you it did. I would say also that by voting Leave (xenophobic campaign aside although I think it is an important factor and don't begrudge people for whom it is the primary one) you ushered in the era whereby we have the chance of a Corbyn PM. Vote Remain and we would be berating George Osborne for sticking out his little finger while having a pint of Old Peculiar on one of his PM's meet the people tours.
I'm sorry to say but anyone but the out and out leavers (eg. @Richard_Tyndall et al) should hang their heads in shame at their behaviour by voting Leave without understanding (and I appreciate you are well-educated, etc, etc) that it was overwhelmingly likely that we would end up precisely where we are today. That is, having to make a series of least worst decisions with the spectre of Jeremy Corbyn on the one hand, and born-again ex-Tories like @HYUFD who accept any old shit the "Tory" party feeds them on the other.
Your fault.
Sozza, you seem a hugely nice, engaging and articulate person but this is on you.
Corbyn could have beaten Osborne after 9 years of austerity with no pro Brexit coalition behind the Tories to give a chance of a 4th term and with Farage and UKIP still up in the polls
Incidentally, have we commented on the other headline at the top of the Mail front page? A bit of a turnaround for the Mail, albeit a very welcome if belated one.
Rather clever, but very polarising. On that brief glimpse, she's much less annoying than Hillary
Is anyone polarisable not yet polarised ?
Point is she would make Trump look the lumbering walrus-wit he is in any presidential debate. And she has the timing to deliver a punchline that Hillary never did.
I`ve long thought that the best way to "dishonour" the 2016 Referndum result will come when leavers themselves say they have changed their minds. I believe that many have buyer`s remorse but are reluctant to admit it.
I wonder whether we are at last getting to the stage where sufficient leavers (in number and profile (eg Peter Oborne)) that admit that they have made a mistake will provide the escape hatch from this dreadful state of affairs.
Peter Oborne has recently questioned the wisdom of the Leave vote in very measured terms. He has not as far as I know said that the 2016 vote should be overturned.
Rather clever, but very polarising. On that brief glimpse, she's much less annoying than Hillary
Is anyone polarisable not yet polarised ?
Point is she would make Trump look the lumbering walrus-wit he is in any presidential debate. And she has the timing to deliver a punchline that Hillary never did.
Hillary won all 3 post debate polls, she still lost the election as they made no difference to Trump's base in Midwestern swing states
Speaking of which what are the bets Becky vs Coleen - which is the leaver and which is the remainer?
I would put Coleen as the remainer and Vardy as the leaver.
Quite possibly. Merseyside was pretty solidly Remain.
Quite apart from the #Wagathachristie element, the fight is an interesting insight into British class structure. The original generation of 2006 Wags regard Rebekah Vardy as a lower class upstart wannabee. That is the root of what has transpired.
Even lower class than the others ?
Exactly!
One of the delights of the intricacies of the British class system is the awareness of status levels immediately adjacent.
The difference in status between a Baronet and an Earl, between a barrister and a QC, between a brickie and a sparky are acute to those involved but obscure to more distant social groups.
I was once with a friend who, in a "heated" (ie friendly) discussion, said "I outrank you" to the person he was arguing with.
Funny but that response will mainly go down well with coastal liberals who voted for Hillary over Trump in 2016 anyway.
I fail to see what Trump voters in the Midwestern and Southern swing states Warren us going to win over? Biden might though.
She’s not going to get Trump voters and is not going to try. It’s the Obama voters who didn’t bother last time she’s after.
Ding ding ding. Trump got less votes than Romney in Wisconsin. You don't need to win Trump voters, you need to get the huge number who didn't vote Hillary.
Rather clever, but very polarising. On that brief glimpse, she's much less annoying than Hillary
Is anyone polarisable not yet polarised ?
Point is she would make Trump look the lumbering walrus-wit he is in any presidential debate. And she has the timing to deliver a punchline that Hillary never did.
Hillary won all 3 post debate polls, she still lost the election as they made no difference to Trump's base in Midwestern swing states
Next you'll be telling us that 2020 is the 2020 2016...
Funny but that response will mainly go down well with coastal liberals who voted for Hillary over Trump in 2016 anyway.
I fail to see what Trump voters in the Midwestern and Southern swing states Warren us going to win over? Biden might though.
She’s not going to get Trump voters and is not going to try. It’s the Obama voters who didn’t bother last time she’s after.
Ding ding ding. Trump got less votes than Romney in Wisconsin. You don't need to win Trump voters, you need to get the huge number who didn't vote Hillary.
I hope that kind of answers your question Mr Topping
Y.
Your fault.
Sozza, you seem a hugely nice, engaging and articulate person but this is on you.
D
To close: If Labour can be returned by its decent rational members to its decent centre-left roots with a decent, economically literate Leader, my quid pro quo would be to vote Remain, with an active and vigourous approach to reform the EU. Make ourselves as influential and important to the EU as France or Germany. Mold it into what we want.
(And I'll put the EU flag back on my number-plate)
The evident enfeeblement of our politics and diplomacy is BECAUSE of our European Union membership. We haven't had to rely on ourselves, when talking about trade or frontiers or customs, for a long time. The muscle memory is almost gone, the sinews have atrophied. The same would apply to France or Germany if they were in a similar position.
So we face a steep learning curve. It will be good for us, in the end.
There is something to this. But if we look at France and the UK, both were rule makers - super-powers who influenced events all over the globe. Once.
France (grudgingly) realised it couldn't be the global rule maker it had previously been after WW2. That age was over. So it was instrumental in creating what became the EU in order to re-orientate its ability to make and influence the rules within a European context. Germany was hobbled and contrite and France could make a lot of hay.
The UK had exactly the same problem, but unlike the French we are, as a nation, much less nationalistic. Or overtly so anyway. We could have forged the Commonwealth into an EU analogue, but there was neither the political will or the desire of the newly freed countries to tie-back up with their ejected masters.
We were kept out of the European project precisely because of our differing approach to both politics in general and, to be blunt, we were still a major competitor of France.
When we were allowed into the European party it wasn't from a position of strength. It was within a context of a deteriorating economy and diplomatic influence. The EU was therefore seen as a plaster to stop the rot (we need help!) rather than an opportunity, as the French always saw it to increase and bolster their own standing.
So yes our diplomatic ability to get things done has deteriorated, and being int he EU has prevented it from becoming what it once was. But that's because we never saw the EU as an opportunity to dominate Europe (politically) and correspondingly convert our previous influence into a new influence.
Rather clever, but very polarising. On that brief glimpse, she's much less annoying than Hillary
Is anyone polarisable not yet polarised ?
Point is she would make Trump look the lumbering walrus-wit he is in any presidential debate. And she has the timing to deliver a punchline that Hillary never did.
Hillary won all 3 post debate polls, she still lost the election as they made no difference to Trump's base in Midwestern swing states
What base? The base that voted for Romney at almost exactly the same rate?
Missing Obama voters is the key, not cracking the "always voted Republican all their life block" .
I hope that kind of answers your question Mr Topping
Yes! Thank you it did. I would say also that by voting Leave (xenophobic campaign aside although I think it is an important factor and don't begrudge people for whom it is the primary one) you ushered in the era whereby we have the chance of a Corbyn PM. Vote Remain and we would be berating George Osborne for sticking out his little finger while having a pint of Old Peculiar on one of his PM's meet the people tours.
I'm sorry to say but anyone but the out and out leavers (eg. @Richard_Tyndall et al) should hang their heads in shame at their behaviour by voting Leave without understanding (and I appreciate you are well-educated, etc, etc) that it was overwhelmingly likely that we would end up precisely where we are today. That is, having to make a series of least worst decisions with the spectre of Jeremy Corbyn on the one hand, and born-again ex-Tories like @HYUFD who accept any old shit the "Tory" party feeds them on the other.
Your fault.
Sozza, you seem a hugely nice, engaging and articulate person but this is on you.
Corbyn could have beaten Osborne after 9 years of austerity with no pro Brexit coalition behind the Tories to give a chance of a 4th term and with Farage and UKIP still up in the polls
No he wouldn't have.
The last Opinium poll before the 2016 EU referendum had Tories 34%, Labour 30%, LDs 19%.
France (grudgingly) realised it couldn't be the global rule maker it had previously been after WW2. That age was over. So it was instrumental in creating what became the EU in order to re-orientate its ability to make and influence the rules within a European context. Germany was hobbled and contrite and France could make a lot of hay.
I think it took a hell of lot longer than immediately post WW2 for France to accept it couldn't be a global ruler. Especially in Africa. Despite Algeria, it still holds on to that notion in parts of that continent.
I think you have to read Tusk properly. He's saying as of the start of the Barnier/Barclay meeting the EU still hadn't received new British proposals. He is also saying today is tge last day to get draft International Treaty text signed off by legal before EUCO. Given he was speaking a few minutes after the breakfast meeting ended he will have known the result.
Funny but that response will mainly go down well with coastal liberals who voted for Hillary over Trump in 2016 anyway.
I fail to see what Trump voters in the Midwestern and Southern swing states Warren us going to win over? Biden might though.
She’s not going to get Trump voters and is not going to try. It’s the Obama voters who didn’t bother last time she’s after.
If the Dems understand that they are not trying to persuade the un-persuadable, that will be a massive breakthrough for them. I fear that they will tack back towards the "old white guy" space and find that he loses to the "undeniably more old white guy" candidate.
I hope that kind of answers your question Mr Topping
Yes! Thank you it did. I would say also that by voting Leave (xenophobic campaign aside although I think it is an important factor and don't begrudge people for whom it is the primary one) you ushered in the era whereby we have the chance of a Corbyn PM. Vote Remain and we would be berating George Osborne for sticking out his little finger while having a pint of Old Peculiar on one of his PM's meet the people tours.
I'm sorry to say but anyone but the out and out leavers (eg. @Richard_Tyndall et al) should hang their heads in shame at their behaviour by voting Leave without understanding (and I appreciate you are well-educated, etc, etc) that it was overwhelmingly likely that we would end up precisely where we are today. That is, having to make a series of least worst decisions with the spectre of Jeremy Corbyn on the one hand, and born-again ex-Tories like @HYUFD who accept any old shit the "Tory" party feeds them on the other.
Your fault.
Sozza, you seem a hugely nice, engaging and articulate person but this is on you.
Corbyn could have beaten Osborne after 9 years of austerity with no pro Brexit coalition behind the Tories to give a chance of a 4th term and with Farage and UKIP still up in the polls
No he wouldn't have.
The last Opinium poll before the 2016 EU referendum had Tories 34%, Labour 30%, LDs 19%.
Rather clever, but very polarising. On that brief glimpse, she's much less annoying than Hillary
Is anyone polarisable not yet polarised ?
Point is she would make Trump look the lumbering walrus-wit he is in any presidential debate. And she has the timing to deliver a punchline that Hillary never did.
Hillary won all 3 post debate polls, she still lost the election as they made no difference to Trump's base in Midwestern swing states
What base? The base that voted for Romney at almost exactly the same rate?
Missing Obama voters is the key, not cracking the "always voted Republican all their life block" .
Trump did better with working class voters and poor voters than Romney in the key swing states that counted in the Midwest and South, Trump did worse than Romney with upper middle class voters in the coastal states that are safe Democratic anyway.
For example, Trump got 47.5% in Michigan and Romney only got 44.7%.
In California though Romney got 37.1% but Trump only got 31.6%.
No matter what Clinton said it always had a feel of preparation, like nothing was off the cuff.
Warren however to me seems more natural, and 100% more likeable. Will she win the electoral college? Who knows.
Warren is a female John Kerry or Michael Dukakis to Hillary's Al Gore
Are you capable of any comment on US presidential politics other than far fetched equivalencies ?
I say what I have learnt from the last few decades of US presidential elections, if liberals on here don't like the findings tough
LOL.
I think people ignore that Warren used to be a Republican and probably voted for Reagan. She had a Damascus moment when she was studying poverty and realised that government regulation can do good for people. She is good at explaining why the government should do things in a way GOP voters understand and like. She isn't Bernie or Biden, who have better support amongst working class white voters atm, but she will do better than Clinton did.
Dr Abiy Ahmed (Ethiopia) wins the Nobel peace prize!
Who is he
Leader of Ethiopia.
He has brought to an end the long running war with Eritrea, freed political prisoners, restored democracy, revitalised the economy and started a massive reforestation programme.
Rather clever, but very polarising. On that brief glimpse, she's much less annoying than Hillary
Is anyone polarisable not yet polarised ?
Point is she would make Trump look the lumbering walrus-wit he is in any presidential debate. And she has the timing to deliver a punchline that Hillary never did.
Hillary won all 3 post debate polls, she still lost the election as they made no difference to Trump's base in Midwestern swing states
What base? The base that voted for Romney at almost exactly the same rate?
Missing Obama voters is the key, not cracking the "always voted Republican all their life block" .
Trump did better with working class voters and poor voters in the key swing states that counted in the Midwest and South, Trump did worse than Romney with upper middle class voters in the coastal states that are safe Democratic anyway.
For example, Trump got 47.5% in Michigan and Romney only got 44.7%.
In California though Romney got 37.1% but Trump only got 31.6%.
He did significantly worse with black and other ethnic minority voters. That’s why he is trying to suppress their vote in 2020.
Latest IBID/TIPP and Emerson polls have Warren with only a 2% popular vote lead over Trump, ie exactly the same as Hillary's popular vote lead in 2016 when she lost the Electoral College to Trump.
No matter what Clinton said it always had a feel of preparation, like nothing was off the cuff.
Warren however to me seems more natural, and 100% more likeable. Will she win the electoral college? Who knows.
Warren is a female John Kerry or Michael Dukakis to Hillary's Al Gore
Are you capable of any comment on US presidential politics other than far fetched equivalencies ?
I say what I have learnt from the last few decades of US presidential elections, if liberals on here don't like the findings tough
LOL.
I think people ignore that Warren used to be a Republican and probably voted for Reagan. She had a Damascus moment when she was studying poverty and realised that government regulation can do good for people. She is good at explaining why the government should do things in a way GOP voters understand and like. She isn't Bernie or Biden, who have better support amongst working class white voters atm, but she will do better than Clinton did.
It would be quite ironic if the ex-Republican beat the ex-Democrat in 2020, as I think she would by some margin if given the opportunity.
Rather clever, but very polarising. On that brief glimpse, she's much less annoying than Hillary
Is anyone polarisable not yet polarised ?
Point is she would make Trump look the lumbering walrus-wit he is in any presidential debate. And she has the timing to deliver a punchline that Hillary never did.
Hillary won all 3 post debate polls, she still lost the election as they made no difference to Trump's base in Midwestern swing states
What base? The base that voted for Romney at almost exactly the same rate?
Missing Obama voters is the key, not cracking the "always voted Republican all their life block" .
Trump did better with working class voters and poor voters in the key swing states that counted in the Midwest and South, Trump did worse than Romney with upper middle class voters in the coastal states that are safe Democratic anyway.
For example, Trump got 47.5% in Michigan and Romney only got 44.7%.
In California though Romney got 37.1% but Trump only got 31.6%.
He did significantly worse with black and other ethnic minority voters. That’s why he is trying to suppress their vote in 2020.
Morris Dancer's post very similar to my views and experience in the polling booth! Pencil did hover a little. I knew we'd be worse off for a few years.
To say you backed every word of what VoteLeave said if you voted Leave is total nonsense. Like saying every single word of a party manifesto must have been read, understood and 100% agreed with by every single voter for that party. Clearly untrue and ridiculous.
I expected us to Leave, and leave in a manner which would now be described as "hard" (A term never mentioned in the referendum campaign as far as oi remember, but like 99% of voters, i didn't follow it all that closely) but then begin the process of negotiating to in some way rejoin the bits we liked. of course we wouldn't get all we wanted, i knew that too.
As it turns out we need to agree a lot before we can do a lot more negotiating during a transition period. OK, makes sense. The exact manner of leaving and the details was absolutely not on the ballot paper, or even that important to voters. Leave means leave, that's just what people thought... it's not a difficult concept
She's miles better than Hillary, and she doesn't have the dodgy baggage. She's also extremely well organised - I don't think she'll make the arrogant blunders that Hillary made in her campaign.
At an Invesco investment conference recently we were told she was the US version of Corbyn in terms of US political spectrum and with her potential policies for tech, banks and pharma stocks? Was that overly alarmist?
Latest IBID/TIPP and Emerson polls have Warren with only a 2% popular vote lead over Trump, ie exactly the same as Hillary's popular vote lead in 2016 when she lost the Electoral College to Trump.
No matter what Clinton said it always had a feel of preparation, like nothing was off the cuff.
Warren however to me seems more natural, and 100% more likeable. Will she win the electoral college? Who knows.
Warren is a female John Kerry or Michael Dukakis to Hillary's Al Gore
Are you capable of any comment on US presidential politics other than far fetched equivalencies ?
I say what I have learnt from the last few decades of US presidential elections, if liberals on here don't like the findings tough
LOL.
I think people ignore that Warren used to be a Republican and probably voted for Reagan. She had a Damascus moment when she was studying poverty and realised that government regulation can do good for people. She is good at explaining why the government should do things in a way GOP voters understand and like. She isn't Bernie or Biden, who have better support amongst working class white voters atm, but she will do better than Clinton did.
Not so sure, I think Warren could lose a few fiscal conservatives who voted for Hillary as they dislike Trump in areas like Orange County, California while failing to win working class Trump voters in the Midwest
Rather clever, but very polarising. On that brief glimpse, she's much less annoying than Hillary
Is anyone polarisable not yet polarised ?
Point is she would make Trump look the lumbering walrus-wit he is in any presidential debate. And she has the timing to deliver a punchline that Hillary never did.
Hillary won all 3 post debate polls, she still lost the election as they made no difference to Trump's base in Midwestern swing states
What base? The base that voted for Romney at almost exactly the same rate?
Missing Obama voters is the key, not cracking the "always voted Republican all their life block" .
Trump did better with working class voters and poor voters than Romney in the key swing states that counted in the Midwest and South, Trump did worse than Romney with upper middle class voters in the coastal states that are safe Democratic anyway.
For example, Trump got 47.5% in Michigan and Romney only got 44.7%.
In California though Romney got 37.1% but Trump only got 31.6%.
I mean, Trump won at the margins previously, and it is uncommon for a POTUS to do better in their reelection campaign than their first; especially a POTUS as unpopular as this one. Democrats have lots of possible target states to make headway. The rust belt will like Warren more than Clinton. Florida has given the vote to ex convicts and has had recent immigrants with voting rights from Puerto Rico. Nevada is increasingly looking purple, and I know every year people talk about Texas, but again, it could happen.
This is no cake walk for Trump; far from it. Should his approvals fall any further and / or a real *cough*MittRomney*cough* primary challenger turn up who can get around 25% of the GOP vote, it doesn't spell good odds for his reelection.
I hope that kind of answers your question Mr Topping
Y.
Your fault.
Sozza, you seem a hugely nice, engaging and articulate person but this is on you.
D
T
(And I'll put the EU flag back on my number-plate)
The evident enfeeblem
So we face a steep learning curve. It will be good for us, in the end.
There is something to this. But if we look at France and the UK, both were rule makers - super-powers who influenced events all over the globe. Once.
When we were allowed into the European party it wasn't from a position of strength. It was within a context of a deteriorating economy and diplomatic influence. The EU was therefore seen as a plaster to stop the rot (we need help!) rather than an opportunity, as the French always saw it to increase and bolster their own standing.
So yes our diplomatic ability to get things done has deteriorated, and being int he EU has prevented it from becoming what it once was. But that's because we never saw the EU as an opportunity to dominate Europe (politically) and correspondingly convert our previous influence into a new influence.
All true.
You miss one important point. The UK could gently retire from the global scene, knowing that the world would continue to be dominated by its values, because of the size of the ex-Empire, and because of the socio-cultural dominance of the United States.
By 1945, moreover, the global hegemony of the English Language was inevitable, with so many major players speaking it, esp the USA. And English was the language of the victors of World War 2. It was a premium brand.
So England/Britain could be much more relaxed about decline than France, which faced cultural usurpation by the Anglo-Saxons AND the steep descent of the French language into irrelevance,
That's another reason why the French were keen on Europe, as a way of preserving French culture and language at the highest levels. Then we joined the EU and got them all to speak English.
She's miles better than Hillary, and she doesn't have the dodgy baggage. She's also extremely well organised - I don't think she'll make the arrogant blunders that Hillary made in her campaign.
At an Invesco investment conference recently we were told she was the US version of Corbyn in terms of US political spectrum and with her potential policies for tech, banks and pharma stocks? Was that overly alarmist?
Yes.
For a start, she's a capitalist, unlike Sanders. And just as pertinently, even Bernie would struggle to get any real socialism through Congress.
One might also note that previous antitrust efforts against first the oil companies, and later telecoms, did no real damage to their investors.
She's miles better than Hillary, and she doesn't have the dodgy baggage. She's also extremely well organised - I don't think she'll make the arrogant blunders that Hillary made in her campaign.
Yes, she does have a determination and drive as well as quite impressive grass roots support. I cannot see Biden or Bernie going the distance.
I don't like to correct such an expert on polls as your good self but I'm sure I would have remembered a 19% poll rating for the LDs in the 2015-17 Parliament.
You're quoting the UKIP vote share for the pre-referendum Opinium poll. LD vote share was 6% so a significant step forward for the Party since then as I'm sure you would agree.
All those remainers who are breathing a sigh of relief at a glimpse of ankle from yesterday's news, pay attention. This is hard Brexit. You've been gaslit into fearing No Deal so much you're now willing to listen to what was, three years ago, the nightmare scenario. Classic Overton window shenanigans. This is not a compromise. Revoke.
No matter what Clinton said it always had a feel of preparation, like nothing was off the cuff.
Warren however to me seems more natural, and 100% more likeable. Will she win the electoral college? Who knows.
Agree with tht first point. Also Ed Milliband's problem.
But also, the ability to essentially say to the hypothetical voter, "I disagree with you on this, if that's a big problem then don't vote for me". That gets my respect whatever my own view on the issue.
I`ve long thought that the best way to "dishonour" the 2016 Referndum result will come when leavers themselves say they have changed their minds. I believe that many have buyer`s remorse but are reluctant to admit it.
As we know from the whole "Shy Tory" syndrome, people who are reluctant to admit a political affiliation will nonetheless cast their General Election vote that way.
Factor in the likelihood that Brexit-in-practice will turn out not to be sunlit uplands, and the next General Election is going to be astonishingly difficult to call.
@Byronic and @ozymandias are fooling themselves. The disasters of the last few years are all down to the fact that Leave campaigned for xenophobia and hosing money at the NHS and not much else. It turns out that can’t be turned into a sane plan for Brexit. Nor can it just be ignored. Blaming the diplomats for your own moral failings is risible.
Latest IBID/TIPP and Emerson polls have Warren with only a 2% popular vote lead over Trump, ie exactly the same as Hillary's popular vote lead in 2016 when she lost the Electoral College to Trump.
Biden has a 7% lead over Trump with IBID/TIPP.
Latest Fox poll has Warren with a 10% lead over Trump, the same as Biden. That poll was published yesterday, as opposed to the "latest" poll you cited which was published 4 days ago.
The only problem with this analysis is that T May did not negotiate a long term brexit end point. She negotiated a transition deal with the future to be negotiated. Also how dividing a reduction in GDP and dividing by the population and shouting we will ALL be poorer is a little hyperbolic.
No matter what Clinton said it always had a feel of preparation, like nothing was off the cuff.
Warren however to me seems more natural, and 100% more likeable. Will she win the electoral college? Who knows.
Warren is a female John Kerry or Michael Dukakis to Hillary's Al Gore
Are you capable of any comment on US presidential politics other than far fetched equivalencies ?
I say what I have learnt from the last few decades of US presidential elections, if liberals on here don't like the findings tough
So what was your equivalency for that famous 50/1 shot tipped by Mike?
I predicted Obama would be re elected in 2012 when some on here were tipping Romney, in 2016 on election night I was saying Trump still had a chance even when RCS called it for Hillary
The only problem with this analysis is that T May did not negotiate a long term brexit end point. She negotiated a transition deal with the future to be negotiated. Also how dividing a reduction in GDP and dividing by the population and shouting we will ALL be poorer is a little hyperbolic.
I`ve long thought that the best way to "dishonour" the 2016 Referndum result will come when leavers themselves say they have changed their minds. I believe that many have buyer`s remorse but are reluctant to admit it.
As we know from the whole "Shy Tory" syndrome, people who are reluctant to admit a political affiliation will nonetheless cast their General Election vote that way.
Factor in the likelihood that Brexit-in-practice will turn out not to be sunlit uplands, and the next General Election is going to be astonishingly difficult to call.
Brexit with deal will mean no difference is noted at the GE as we will be in transition. It's the one after this one that the Brexit economic outcome will decide. This election will be about the buckling and collapse of the Labour shields in England and Wales
@Byronic and @ozymandias are fooling themselves. The disasters of the last few years are all down to the fact that Leave campaigned for xenophobia and hosing money at the NHS and not much else. It turns out that can’t be turned into a sane plan for Brexit. Nor can it just be ignored. Blaming the diplomats for your own moral failings is risible.
This is the 98,483rd occasion on which you've said this. It doesn't grow more persuasive over time.
Rather clever, but very polarising. On that brief glimpse, she's much less annoying than Hillary
Is anyone polarisable not yet polarised ?
Point is she would make Trump look the lumbering walrus-wit he is in any presidential debate. And she has the timing to deliver a punchline that Hillary never did.
Hillary won all 3 post debate polls, she still lost the election as they made no difference to Trump's base in Midwestern swing states
What base? The base that voted for Romney at almost exactly the same rate?
Missing Obama voters is the key, not cracking the "always voted Republican all their life block" .
Trump did better with working class voters and poor voters in the key swing states that counted in the Midwest and South, Trump did worse than Romney with upper middle class voters in the coastal states that are safe Democratic anyway.
For example, Trump got 47.5% in Michigan and Romney only got 44.7%.
In California though Romney got 37.1% but Trump only got 31.6%.
He did significantly worse with black and other ethnic minority voters. That’s why he is trying to suppress their vote in 2020.
Wrong.
Trump won 8% of the black vote, Romney only won 6% of the black vote.
Trump also won 29% of the Hispanic vote, Romney only won 27% of the Hispanic vote.
Incidentally, have we commented on the other headline at the top of the Mail front page? A bit of a turnaround for the Mail, albeit a very welcome if belated one.
I don't think so, but yes - and potentially a vey powerful one. I haven't read the story, but assuming it's a personal account of a bad outcome from one of the diseases protected against by MMR it may make people stop and think (in a way that straightforward medical advice, unfortunately, sometimes fails to do).
@Byronic and @ozymandias are fooling themselves. The disasters of the last few years are all down to the fact that Leave campaigned for xenophobia and hosing money at the NHS and not much else. It turns out that can’t be turned into a sane plan for Brexit. Nor can it just be ignored. Blaming the diplomats for your own moral failings is risible.
This is the 98,483rd occasion on which you've said this. It doesn't grow more persuasive over time.
It does become funnier though, with the side salad of derangement.....
No matter what Clinton said it always had a feel of preparation, like nothing was off the cuff.
Warren however to me seems more natural, and 100% more likeable. Will she win the electoral college? Who knows.
Agree with tht first point. Also Ed Milliband's problem.
But also, the ability to essentially say to the hypothetical voter, "I disagree with you on this, if that's a big problem then don't vote for me". That gets my respect whatever my own view on the issue.
I`ve long thought that the best way to "dishonour" the 2016 Referndum result will come when leavers themselves say they have changed their minds. I believe that many have buyer`s remorse but are reluctant to admit it.
At the moment, the only remorse I have is that three and a half years on the goods I bought have still to be delivered and that the supplier is now arguing that the contract I signed was worthless.
All those remainers who are breathing a sigh of relief at a glimpse of ankle from yesterday's news, pay attention. This is hard Brexit. You've been gaslit into fearing No Deal so much you're now willing to listen to what was, three years ago, the nightmare scenario. Classic Overton window shenanigans. This is not a compromise. Revoke.
I have no idea what an Overton is, but I am up for a darned good revocation!
No matter what Clinton said it always had a feel of preparation, like nothing was off the cuff.
Warren however to me seems more natural, and 100% more likeable. Will she win the electoral college? Who knows.
Warren is a female John Kerry or Michael Dukakis to Hillary's Al Gore
Are you capable of any comment on US presidential politics other than far fetched equivalencies ?
I say what I have learnt from the last few decades of US presidential elections, if liberals on here don't like the findings tough
LOL.
I think people ignore that Warren used to be a Republican and probably voted for Reagan. She had a Damascus moment when she was studying poverty and realised that government regulation can do good for people. She is good at explaining why the government should do things in a way GOP voters understand and like. She isn't Bernie or Biden, who have better support amongst working class white voters atm, but she will do better than Clinton did.
Not so sure, I think Warren could lose a few fiscal conservatives who voted for Hillary as they dislike Trump in areas like Orange County, California while failing to win working class Trump voters in the Midwest
She can afford to lose fiscal conservatives in OC, or NY, or anywhere solidly blue. Any Dem will do better than pre Trump era in the suburbs; we've seen this in House races across multiple states. And I think Clinton was uniquely reviled by many voters, even historic Democratic voters. Warren is much more popular than Clinton, and will do better with working class whites than Clinton. Trump barely won the rust belt first time around, and he hasn't become any more popular.
Trump 2016: Michigan, won by ~ 0.25%, Pennsylvannia, won by less than 1%, Wisconsin, won by less than 1%. If Warren loses no Clinton state, that is a Warren win.
I`ve long thought that the best way to "dishonour" the 2016 Referndum result will come when leavers themselves say they have changed their minds. I believe that many have buyer`s remorse but are reluctant to admit it.
At the moment, the only remorse I have is that three and a half years on the goods I bought have still to be delivered and that the supplier is now arguing that the contract I signed was worthless.
I trust you won't be purchasing from that supplier again?
@Byronic and @ozymandias are fooling themselves. The disasters of the last few years are all down to the fact that Leave campaigned for xenophobia and hosing money at the NHS and not much else. It turns out that can’t be turned into a sane plan for Brexit. Nor can it just be ignored. Blaming the diplomats for your own moral failings is risible.
This is the 98,483rd occasion on which you've said this. It doesn't grow more persuasive over time.
I realise that it is not new. Nor is it complicated. It is simple and true and the point that Leavers will never get over.
I`ve long thought that the best way to "dishonour" the 2016 Referndum result will come when leavers themselves say they have changed their minds. I believe that many have buyer`s remorse but are reluctant to admit it.
At the moment, the only remorse I have is that three and a half years on the goods I bought have still to be delivered and that the supplier is now arguing that the contract I signed was worthless.
You didn't sign a contract. You expressed an opinion. And since then you've not been able to agree with your fellow travellers what you wanted.
Latest IBID/TIPP and Emerson polls have Warren with only a 2% popular vote lead over Trump, ie exactly the same as Hillary's popular vote lead in 2016 when she lost the Electoral College to Trump.
Biden has a 7% lead over Trump with IBID/TIPP.
Latest Fox poll has Warren with a 10% lead over Trump, the same as Biden. That poll was published yesterday, as opposed to the "latest" poll you cited which was published 4 days ago.
So on average Biden still does better than Warren then
Comments
So we face a steep learning curve. It will be good for us, in the end.
I wonder whether we are at last getting to the stage where sufficient leavers (in number and profile (eg Peter Oborne)) that admit that they have made a mistake will provide the escape hatch from this dreadful state of affairs.
Although any deal must get past the Gina Miller veto of course
No matter what Clinton said it always had a feel of preparation, like nothing was off the cuff.
Warren however to me seems more natural, and 100% more likeable. Will she win the electoral college? Who knows.
Point is she would make Trump look the lumbering walrus-wit he is in any presidential debate.
And she has the timing to deliver a punchline that Hillary never did.
Trump got less votes than Romney in Wisconsin. You don't need to win Trump voters, you need to get the huge number who didn't vote Hillary.
France (grudgingly) realised it couldn't be the global rule maker it had previously been after WW2. That age was over. So it was instrumental in creating what became the EU in order to re-orientate its ability to make and influence the rules within a European context. Germany was hobbled and contrite and France could make a lot of hay.
The UK had exactly the same problem, but unlike the French we are, as a nation, much less nationalistic. Or overtly so anyway. We could have forged the Commonwealth into an EU analogue, but there was neither the political will or the desire of the newly freed countries to tie-back up with their ejected masters.
We were kept out of the European project precisely because of our differing approach to both politics in general and, to be blunt, we were still a major competitor of France.
When we were allowed into the European party it wasn't from a position of strength. It was within a context of a deteriorating economy and diplomatic influence. The EU was therefore seen as a plaster to stop the rot (we need help!) rather than an opportunity, as the French always saw it to increase and bolster their own standing.
So yes our diplomatic ability to get things done has deteriorated, and being int he EU has prevented it from becoming what it once was. But that's because we never saw the EU as an opportunity to dominate Europe (politically) and correspondingly convert our previous influence into a new influence.
Missing Obama voters is the key, not cracking the "always voted Republican all their life block" .
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2017_United_Kingdom_general_election
The latest Opinium poll has Tories 38%, Labour 23%, LDs 15%
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_next_United_Kingdom_general_election
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_warren-6251.html
https://www.fraudguarantee.com/our-team.html
For example, Trump got 47.5% in Michigan and Romney only got 44.7%.
In California though Romney got 37.1% but Trump only got 31.6%.
He has brought to an end the long running war with Eritrea, freed political prisoners, restored democracy, revitalised the economy and started a massive reforestation programme.
Ethiopia has perhaps turned a corner.
Biden has a 7% lead over Trump with IBID/TIPP.
To say you backed every word of what VoteLeave said if you voted Leave is total nonsense. Like saying every single word of a party manifesto must have been read, understood and 100% agreed with by every single voter for that party. Clearly untrue and ridiculous.
I expected us to Leave, and leave in a manner which would now be described as "hard" (A term never mentioned in the referendum campaign as far as oi remember, but like 99% of voters, i didn't follow it all that closely) but then begin the process of negotiating to in some way rejoin the bits we liked. of course we wouldn't get all we wanted, i knew that too.
As it turns out we need to agree a lot before we can do a lot more negotiating during a transition period. OK, makes sense. The exact manner of leaving and the details was absolutely not on the ballot paper, or even that important to voters. Leave means leave, that's just what people thought... it's not a difficult concept
This is no cake walk for Trump; far from it. Should his approvals fall any further and / or a real *cough*MittRomney*cough* primary challenger turn up who can get around 25% of the GOP vote, it doesn't spell good odds for his reelection.
You miss one important point. The UK could gently retire from the global scene, knowing that the world would continue to be dominated by its values, because of the size of the ex-Empire, and because of the socio-cultural dominance of the United States.
By 1945, moreover, the global hegemony of the English Language was inevitable, with so many major players speaking it, esp the USA. And English was the language of the victors of World War 2. It was a premium brand.
So England/Britain could be much more relaxed about decline than France, which faced cultural usurpation by the Anglo-Saxons AND the steep descent of the French language into irrelevance,
That's another reason why the French were keen on Europe, as a way of preserving French culture and language at the highest levels. Then we joined the EU and got them all to speak English.
Heh.
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/11/mitt-romney-2020-plan-to-help-republicans-044221
Very happy about my 1000/1 bet on him for 2020.
For a start, she's a capitalist, unlike Sanders.
And just as pertinently, even Bernie would struggle to get any real socialism through Congress.
One might also note that previous antitrust efforts against first the oil companies, and later telecoms, did no real damage to their investors.
You're quoting the UKIP vote share for the pre-referendum Opinium poll. LD vote share was 6% so a significant step forward for the Party since then as I'm sure you would agree.
But also, the ability to essentially say to the hypothetical voter, "I disagree with you on this, if that's a big problem then don't vote for me". That gets my respect whatever my own view on the issue.
Factor in the likelihood that Brexit-in-practice will turn out not to be sunlit uplands, and the next General Election is going to be astonishingly difficult to call.
That said there is a definite tiny subset of crotchety old writers who have been driven tonto by Brexit.
Philip Pullman
Ian McEwan
Michael Morpurgo
and now
John Le Carre?
Have all gone variously round the bend. There are probably others.
I think he might just manage that.
https://twitter.com/bbcnolan/status/1182583171243749376?s=21
Trump won 8% of the black vote, Romney only won 6% of the black vote.
Trump also won 29% of the Hispanic vote, Romney only won 27% of the Hispanic vote.
We await a more mainstream position.
Trump 2016: Michigan, won by ~ 0.25%, Pennsylvannia, won by less than 1%, Wisconsin, won by less than 1%. If Warren loses no Clinton state, that is a Warren win.