It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.
nico67 said:> @RobD said:> > @timmo said:> > Brexit 17307> > Lib Dem 18706> > Conservative 4863> > Labour 5563> > Green 4663> > Change 2062> > > > Sutton result> > Here we go!Interesting Sutton voted to leave by 53 v 47. Yet Lib Dems top there .
> @RobD said:> > @timmo said:> > Brexit 17307> > Lib Dem 18706> > Conservative 4863> > Labour 5563> > Green 4663> > Change 2062> > > > Sutton result> > Here we go!Interesting Sutton voted to leave by 53 v 47. Yet Lib Dems top there .
eristdoof said:> @Paristonda said:> Lib Dems getting 17% but no seat in the NE, quite a threshold for a "PR" systemwhy should 17% get a seat when there are only 3 seats in the NE?
> @Paristonda said:> Lib Dems getting 17% but no seat in the NE, quite a threshold for a "PR" systemwhy should 17% get a seat when there are only 3 seats in the NE?
Comments
Holborn & StP (Starmer's seat) LD 11828, Lab 9631, Green 6446, BXP 4052, ChUK 1688, Con 1411.
Hampstead & Kilburn LD 9568, Lab 3875, Green 2880, BXP 2349, ChUK 1664, Con 1455
All things being relative, not a bad result for Starmer.
2 Brexit Party MEPs and 1 Labour MEP elected from the region
Tories behind the Greens
> Lib Dems getting 17% but no seat in the NE, quite a threshold for a "PR" system
why should 17% get a seat when there are only 3 seats in the NE?