Best any of us can do is contact people we know in Peterborough and make sure that 7000 signatures are collected on the petition. She needs to be out of Parliament once and for all.
If the ERG vote down Brady having voted down the Deal and Cooper and Grieve pass they will have opened the way to BINO which would be more likely than No Deal
To go a bit Keegan, from Mrs May's point of view the Brady means that she has to go to Brussels and get something, and the Cooper makes it less likely that she will succeed in doing so because the EU will just luv it that the threat of no deal has more or less gone.
I don't think her being black has a tin of beans to do with her sentence, OTOH it has probably made her brother's more severe because he is a young black man. The leniency is due to the judge being a bleeding lefty halfwit.
Best any of us can do is contact people we know in Peterborough and make sure that 7000 signatures are collected on the petition. She needs to be out of Parliament once and for all.
As I've said if Labour has any sense they'll support the petition. Surely the Tories (And minor parties) will ?
I don't think her being black has a tin of beans to do with her sentence, OTOH it has probably made her brother's more severe because he is a young black man. The leniency is due to the judge being a bleeding lefty halfwit.
Yes, I'd say gender might be a bigger part of it.
It didn't in the Huhne/Price case - they both got the same. And is was a fairly equivalent sort of case
There will be a recall petition which needs about 7000 signatures to force a by election. Her barristers comments in mitigation that she has stayed an MP as it is her only source of income likely to be at the top of the clipboards for that
I don't think her being black has a tin of beans to do with her sentence, OTOH it has probably made her brother's more severe because he is a young black man. The leniency is due to the judge being a bleeding lefty halfwit.
Yes, I'd say gender might be a bigger part of it.
It didn't in the Huhne/Price case - they both got the same. And is was a fairly equivalent sort of case
The judge was clearly undermining the jury's verdict.
I don't think her being black has a tin of beans to do with her sentence, OTOH it has probably made her brother's more severe because he is a young black man. The leniency is due to the judge being a bleeding lefty halfwit.
I think the reason that she got a lesser sentence is explained in these:
"Judge: what matters is that I am not sure that you passed the speeding ticket to your brother with the intention, expressly or otherwise, of perverting the course of justice."
"Judge: I sentence Festus on the basis that you were trying to avoid speeding points for yourself, not for your sister. There was no conspiracy between the two of you at the outset."
I don't think her being black has a tin of beans to do with her sentence, OTOH it has probably made her brother's more severe because he is a young black man. The leniency is due to the judge being a bleeding lefty halfwit.
Might be to do with Good Character? Don't know if Festus has previous.
I don't think her being black has a tin of beans to do with her sentence, OTOH it has probably made her brother's more severe because he is a young black man. The leniency is due to the judge being a bleeding lefty halfwit.
Yes, I'd say gender might be a bigger part of it.
It didn't in the Huhne/Price case - they both got the same. And is was a fairly equivalent sort of case
In general, women are dealt with more leniently by the criminal justice system than men.
In this case, it seems to be the fact that she is a prominent public figure which swayed the judge. I view that as an aggravating factor, not a mitigating factor.
I don't think her being black has a tin of beans to do with her sentence, OTOH it has probably made her brother's more severe because he is a young black man. The leniency is due to the judge being a bleeding lefty halfwit.
Might be to do with Good Character? Don't know if Festus has previous.
I don't think her being black has a tin of beans to do with her sentence, OTOH it has probably made her brother's more severe because he is a young black man. The leniency is due to the judge being a bleeding lefty halfwit.
Might be to do with Good Character? Don't know if Festus has previous.
Quite a lot, but nothing since 2014. See previous thread.
I don't think her being black has a tin of beans to do with her sentence, OTOH it has probably made her brother's more severe because he is a young black man. The leniency is due to the judge being a bleeding lefty halfwit.
Yes, I'd say gender might be a bigger part of it.
It didn't in the Huhne/Price case - they both got the same. And is was a fairly equivalent sort of case
In general, women are dealt with more leniently by the criminal justice system than men.
In this case, it seems to be the fact that she is a prominent public figure which swayed the judge. I view that as an aggravating factor, not a mitigating factor.
I cannot disagree with you on that.
A solicitor and MP should have been held to a higher standard in this case. She perverted the course of justice. As an officer of the law and a law-maker, that is beyond the acceptable.
Best any of us can do is contact people we know in Peterborough and make sure that 7000 signatures are collected on the petition. She needs to be out of Parliament once and for all.
As I've said if Labour has any sense they'll support the petition. Surely the Tories (And minor parties) will ?
I don't think her being black has a tin of beans to do with her sentence, OTOH it has probably made her brother's more severe because he is a young black man. The leniency is due to the judge being a bleeding lefty halfwit.
Yes, I'd say gender might be a bigger part of it.
It didn't in the Huhne/Price case - they both got the same. And is was a fairly equivalent sort of case
Huhne and Price colluded though. In this case, the judge seems to have sentenced on the basis that the crimes were independent of each other (somehow).
I trust that the Law Society will ensure she never works as a solicitor again ...
Professional standards for solicitors actually very high and dishonesty is a striking off offence - but it will have to wind through quasi judicial process before inevitable conclusion
I don't think her being black has a tin of beans to do with her sentence, OTOH it has probably made her brother's more severe because he is a young black man. The leniency is due to the judge being a bleeding lefty halfwit.
Yes, I'd say gender might be a bigger part of it.
It didn't in the Huhne/Price case - they both got the same. And is was a fairly equivalent sort of case
Huhne and Price colluded though. In this case, the judge seems to have sentenced on the basis that the crimes were independent of each other (somehow).
The judge clearly has some sort of agenda - it is just mindboggling
A dental student found guilty of sexually assaulting a six-year-old girl will face no punishment after being granted an absolute discharge.
Christopher Daniel, 18, denied carrying out numerous assaults on the girl while he was aged 15 to 17 and she was between six and eight.
He was granted the discharge by Sheriff Gerard Sinclair after being found guilty at Dumbarton sheriff court at the end of a three-day trial. It means that Daniel, from Glasgow, will not be placed on the sex offenders register and the guilty verdict was not recorded as a conviction.
The victim’s family were not allowed to see a report sent by the sheriff to the Crown Office explaining his “wholly exceptional” decision, an STV investigation has found. They believe that Daniel’s middle-class background, strong educational attainment and career prospects helped to convince the sheriff to grant the most lenient possible disposal.
I don't think her being black has a tin of beans to do with her sentence, OTOH it has probably made her brother's more severe because he is a young black man. The leniency is due to the judge being a bleeding lefty halfwit.
Yes, I'd say gender might be a bigger part of it.
It didn't in the Huhne/Price case - they both got the same. And is was a fairly equivalent sort of case
In general, women are dealt with more leniently by the criminal justice system than men.
In this case, it seems to be the fact that she is a prominent public figure which swayed the judge. I view that as an aggravating factor, not a mitigating factor.
I cannot disagree with you on that.
A solicitor and MP should have been held to a higher standard in this case. She perverted the course of justice. As an officer of the law and a law-maker, that is beyond the acceptable.
The judge has damaged justice today.
The Establishment look after their own will be what The Little People take out of that sentence.
I don't think her being black has a tin of beans to do with her sentence, OTOH it has probably made her brother's more severe because he is a young black man. The leniency is due to the judge being a bleeding lefty halfwit.
Yes, I'd say gender might be a bigger part of it.
It didn't in the Huhne/Price case - they both got the same. And is was a fairly equivalent sort of case
Huhne and Price colluded though. In this case, the judge seems to have sentenced on the basis that the crimes were independent of each other (somehow).
The judge clearly has some sort of agenda - it is just mindboggling
How are judges selected for cases like this? Just random chance?
Best any of us can do is contact people we know in Peterborough and make sure that 7000 signatures are collected on the petition. She needs to be out of Parliament once and for all.
As I've said if Labour has any sense they'll support the petition. Surely the Tories (And minor parties) will ?
If Labour has any sense they'll organise it.
Guardian:
All major political parties, including Labour, have said they will campaign for Onasanya to be kicked out of parliament.
The six-week recall petition won’t be triggered unless and until her appeal against conviction is lost.
A dental student found guilty of sexually assaulting a six-year-old girl will face no punishment after being granted an absolute discharge.
Christopher Daniel, 18, denied carrying out numerous assaults on the girl while he was aged 15 to 17 and she was between six and eight.
He was granted the discharge by Sheriff Gerard Sinclair after being found guilty at Dumbarton sheriff court at the end of a three-day trial. It means that Daniel, from Glasgow, will not be placed on the sex offenders register and the guilty verdict was not recorded as a conviction.
The victim’s family were not allowed to see a report sent by the sheriff to the Crown Office explaining his “wholly exceptional” decision, an STV investigation has found. They believe that Daniel’s middle-class background, strong educational attainment and career prospects helped to convince the sheriff to grant the most lenient possible disposal.
So, to be clear,the judge thinks that lying and perverting to course of justice, blaming an innocent third party, is providing a good role model for young black women.
Of course, like everything else about him, Rees Mogg's Catholicism is a sham. He has voted for every restriction and reduction of welfare benefits since he has been an MP. His political position is the antithesis of Catholic social teaching and his support for nuclear weapons also contradicts the position of the Church whose whip he claims to take. It is only on same sex marriage that he comes close, which seems to point to a man who is simply a bigot in the same category as the DUP.
A dental student found guilty of sexually assaulting a six-year-old girl will face no punishment after being granted an absolute discharge.
Christopher Daniel, 18, denied carrying out numerous assaults on the girl while he was aged 15 to 17 and she was between six and eight.
He was granted the discharge by Sheriff Gerard Sinclair after being found guilty at Dumbarton sheriff court at the end of a three-day trial. It means that Daniel, from Glasgow, will not be placed on the sex offenders register and the guilty verdict was not recorded as a conviction.
The victim’s family were not allowed to see a report sent by the sheriff to the Crown Office explaining his “wholly exceptional” decision, an STV investigation has found. They believe that Daniel’s middle-class background, strong educational attainment and career prospects helped to convince the sheriff to grant the most lenient possible disposal.
Best any of us can do is contact people we know in Peterborough and make sure that 7000 signatures are collected on the petition. She needs to be out of Parliament once and for all.
My parents are next door in Rutland, will remind them to speak to anyone they know in Peterborough.
Hopefully someone will get a phone bank going and print some leaflets.
A dental student found guilty of sexually assaulting a six-year-old girl will face no punishment after being granted an absolute discharge.
Christopher Daniel, 18, denied carrying out numerous assaults on the girl while he was aged 15 to 17 and she was between six and eight.
He was granted the discharge by Sheriff Gerard Sinclair after being found guilty at Dumbarton sheriff court at the end of a three-day trial. It means that Daniel, from Glasgow, will not be placed on the sex offenders register and the guilty verdict was not recorded as a conviction.
The victim’s family were not allowed to see a report sent by the sheriff to the Crown Office explaining his “wholly exceptional” decision, an STV investigation has found. They believe that Daniel’s middle-class background, strong educational attainment and career prospects helped to convince the sheriff to grant the most lenient possible disposal.
A dental student found guilty of sexually assaulting a six-year-old girl will face no punishment after being granted an absolute discharge.
Christopher Daniel, 18, denied carrying out numerous assaults on the girl while he was aged 15 to 17 and she was between six and eight.
He was granted the discharge by Sheriff Gerard Sinclair after being found guilty at Dumbarton sheriff court at the end of a three-day trial. It means that Daniel, from Glasgow, will not be placed on the sex offenders register and the guilty verdict was not recorded as a conviction.
The victim’s family were not allowed to see a report sent by the sheriff to the Crown Office explaining his “wholly exceptional” decision, an STV investigation has found. They believe that Daniel’s middle-class background, strong educational attainment and career prospects helped to convince the sheriff to grant the most lenient possible disposal.
A dental student found guilty of sexually assaulting a six-year-old girl will face no punishment after being granted an absolute discharge.
Christopher Daniel, 18, denied carrying out numerous assaults on the girl while he was aged 15 to 17 and she was between six and eight.
He was granted the discharge by Sheriff Gerard Sinclair after being found guilty at Dumbarton sheriff court at the end of a three-day trial. It means that Daniel, from Glasgow, will not be placed on the sex offenders register and the guilty verdict was not recorded as a conviction.
The victim’s family were not allowed to see a report sent by the sheriff to the Crown Office explaining his “wholly exceptional” decision, an STV investigation has found. They believe that Daniel’s middle-class background, strong educational attainment and career prospects helped to convince the sheriff to grant the most lenient possible disposal.
Good grief. In effect, the Sheriff was condoning the offence.
People like Xenon will be shocked to learn that Christopher Daniel is white.
I don't think that having good career prospects, or educational prospects, ahead of you, should result in any sentencing discount. If anything, it seems worse for such people to commit serious offences than it is for people who have nothing.
A dental student found guilty of sexually assaulting a six-year-old girl will face no punishment after being granted an absolute discharge.
Christopher Daniel, 18, denied carrying out numerous assaults on the girl while he was aged 15 to 17 and she was between six and eight.
He was granted the discharge by Sheriff Gerard Sinclair after being found guilty at Dumbarton sheriff court at the end of a three-day trial. It means that Daniel, from Glasgow, will not be placed on the sex offenders register and the guilty verdict was not recorded as a conviction.
The victim’s family were not allowed to see a report sent by the sheriff to the Crown Office explaining his “wholly exceptional” decision, an STV investigation has found. They believe that Daniel’s middle-class background, strong educational attainment and career prospects helped to convince the sheriff to grant the most lenient possible disposal.
Good grief. In effect, the Sheriff was condoning the offence.
People like Xenon will be shocked to learn that Christopher Daniel is white.
I don't think that having good career prospects, or educational prospects, ahead of you, should result in any sentencing discount. If anything, it seems worse for such people to commit serious offences than it is for people who have nothing.
What happened to that female student who stabbed her boyfriend and was convicted but she was still intending to become a doctor?
I think hizzoner based her confusion on her MS/chaos on becoming an unexpected MP.
Can she appeal against sentence? I don't know why she would, mind. Logically.
She can appeal against both sentence and conviction.
Does the recall mechanism get triggered before appeal?
I don't think so, I've seen some people say the recall petition can only begin once she's exhausted the appellate process.
God, this saga could go on for months then.
Indeed, like I said earlier, the AG could ask for a sentence review if he thinks it was unduly lenient.
Although given the political sensitivities of a Tory AG appearing to try to engineer a by election in a Labour held seat I cannot see it happening.
Plus it's not a sufficiently heinous crime to intervene on. One lenient sentence for dodging a speeding fine is hardly up there with the Great Judicial Mistakes.
A dental student found guilty of sexually assaulting a six-year-old girl will face no punishment after being granted an absolute discharge.
Christopher Daniel, 18, denied carrying out numerous assaults on the girl while he was aged 15 to 17 and she was between six and eight.
He was granted the discharge by Sheriff Gerard Sinclair after being found guilty at Dumbarton sheriff court at the end of a three-day trial. It means that Daniel, from Glasgow, will not be placed on the sex offenders register and the guilty verdict was not recorded as a conviction.
The victim’s family were not allowed to see a report sent by the sheriff to the Crown Office explaining his “wholly exceptional” decision, an STV investigation has found. They believe that Daniel’s middle-class background, strong educational attainment and career prospects helped to convince the sheriff to grant the most lenient possible disposal.
I think the judge has taken a slice of racial bias here - but both ways creating over-leniency for Fiona as she's a 'black woman made good'; yet her brother is clearly a ne'er do well (I note his last conviction was 2014...) black man.
A dental student found guilty of sexually assaulting a six-year-old girl will face no punishment after being granted an absolute discharge.
Christopher Daniel, 18, denied carrying out numerous assaults on the girl while he was aged 15 to 17 and she was between six and eight.
He was granted the discharge by Sheriff Gerard Sinclair after being found guilty at Dumbarton sheriff court at the end of a three-day trial. It means that Daniel, from Glasgow, will not be placed on the sex offenders register and the guilty verdict was not recorded as a conviction.
The victim’s family were not allowed to see a report sent by the sheriff to the Crown Office explaining his “wholly exceptional” decision, an STV investigation has found. They believe that Daniel’s middle-class background, strong educational attainment and career prospects helped to convince the sheriff to grant the most lenient possible disposal.
Good grief. In effect, the Sheriff was condoning the offence.
People like Xenon will be shocked to learn that Christopher Daniel is white.
I don't think that having good career prospects, or educational prospects, ahead of you, should result in any sentencing discount. If anything, it seems worse for such people to commit serious offences than it is for people who have nothing.
What happened to that female student who stabbed her boyfriend and was convicted but she was still intending to become a doctor?
I think hizzoner based her confusion on her MS/chaos on becoming an unexpected MP.
Can she appeal against sentence? I don't know why she would, mind. Logically.
She can appeal against both sentence and conviction.
Does the recall mechanism get triggered before appeal?
I don't think so, I've seen some people say the recall petition can only begin once she's exhausted the appellate process.
God, this saga could go on for months then.
Indeed, like I said earlier, the AG could ask for a sentence review if he thinks it was unduly lenient.
Although given the political sensitivities of a Tory AG appearing to try to engineer a by election in a Labour held seat I cannot see it happening.
Plus it's not a sufficiently heinous crime to intervene on. One lenient sentence for dodging a speeding fine is hardly up there with the Great Judicial Mistakes.
It's a heinous crime for gamblers, one that would have ensured a by election in a marginal.
A dental student found guilty of sexually assaulting a six-year-old girl will face no punishment after being granted an absolute discharge.
Christopher Daniel, 18, denied carrying out numerous assaults on the girl while he was aged 15 to 17 and she was between six and eight.
He was granted the discharge by Sheriff Gerard Sinclair after being found guilty at Dumbarton sheriff court at the end of a three-day trial. It means that Daniel, from Glasgow, will not be placed on the sex offenders register and the guilty verdict was not recorded as a conviction.
The victim’s family were not allowed to see a report sent by the sheriff to the Crown Office explaining his “wholly exceptional” decision, an STV investigation has found. They believe that Daniel’s middle-class background, strong educational attainment and career prospects helped to convince the sheriff to grant the most lenient possible disposal.
Good grief. In effect, the Sheriff was condoning the offence.
People like Xenon will be shocked to learn that Christopher Daniel is white.
I don't think that having good career prospects, or educational prospects, ahead of you, should result in any sentencing discount. If anything, it seems worse for such people to commit serious offences than it is for people who have nothing.
What happened to that female student who stabbed her boyfriend and was convicted but she was still intending to become a doctor?
I know.
I can see that there are inevitable ways that being middle class will help you get more lenient treatment (and it overlaps with race). You'll have a good solicitor/barrister; he'll make sure you wear a suit, and address the judge and prosecution respectfully. He'll make sure you engage with the system, advising you to plead guilty if necessary, and to make a heartfelt statement in mitigation.
I think hizzoner based her confusion on her MS/chaos on becoming an unexpected MP.
Can she appeal against sentence? I don't know why she would, mind. Logically.
She can appeal against both sentence and conviction.
Does the recall mechanism get triggered before appeal?
I don't think so, I've seen some people say the recall petition can only begin once she's exhausted the appellate process.
God, this saga could go on for months then.
Indeed, like I said earlier, the AG could ask for a sentence review if he thinks it was unduly lenient.
Although given the political sensitivities of a Tory AG appearing to try to engineer a by election in a Labour held seat I cannot see it happening.
Plus it's not a sufficiently heinous crime to intervene on. One lenient sentence for dodging a speeding fine is hardly up there with the Great Judicial Mistakes.
It's a heinous crime for gamblers, one that would have ensured a by election in a marginal.
A dental student found guilty of sexually assaulting a six-year-old girl will face no punishment after being granted an absolute discharge.
Christopher Daniel, 18, denied carrying out numerous assaults on the girl while he was aged 15 to 17 and she was between six and eight.
He was granted the discharge by Sheriff Gerard Sinclair after being found guilty at Dumbarton sheriff court at the end of a three-day trial. It means that Daniel, from Glasgow, will not be placed on the sex offenders register and the guilty verdict was not recorded as a conviction.
The victim’s family were not allowed to see a report sent by the sheriff to the Crown Office explaining his “wholly exceptional” decision, an STV investigation has found. They believe that Daniel’s middle-class background, strong educational attainment and career prospects helped to convince the sheriff to grant the most lenient possible disposal.
Good grief. In effect, the Sheriff was condoning the offence.
People like Xenon will be shocked to learn that Christopher Daniel is white.
I don't think that having good career prospects, or educational prospects, ahead of you, should result in any sentencing discount. If anything, it seems worse for such people to commit serious offences than it is for people who have nothing.
What happened to that female student who stabbed her boyfriend and was convicted but she was still intending to become a doctor?
A dental student found guilty of sexually assaulting a six-year-old girl will face no punishment after being granted an absolute discharge.
Christopher Daniel, 18, denied carrying out numerous assaults on the girl while he was aged 15 to 17 and she was between six and eight.
He was granted the discharge by Sheriff Gerard Sinclair after being found guilty at Dumbarton sheriff court at the end of a three-day trial. It means that Daniel, from Glasgow, will not be placed on the sex offenders register and the guilty verdict was not recorded as a conviction.
The victim’s family were not allowed to see a report sent by the sheriff to the Crown Office explaining his “wholly exceptional” decision, an STV investigation has found. They believe that Daniel’s middle-class background, strong educational attainment and career prospects helped to convince the sheriff to grant the most lenient possible disposal.
Good grief. In effect, the Sheriff was condoning the offence.
People like Xenon will be shocked to learn that Christopher Daniel is white.
I don't think that having good career prospects, or educational prospects, ahead of you, should result in any sentencing discount. If anything, it seems worse for such people to commit serious offences than it is for people who have nothing.
What happened to that female student who stabbed her boyfriend and was convicted but she was still intending to become a doctor?
I know.
I can see that there are inevitable ways that being middle class will help you get more lenient treatment (and it overlaps with race). You'll have a good solicitor/barrister; he'll make sure you wear a suit, and address the judge and prosecution respectfully. He'll make sure you engage with the system, advising you to plead guilty if necessary, and to make a heartfelt statement in mitigation.
Interesting article but I think there are too many important differences for the analogy to stick. Militant knew what they wanted, even if what they wanted was barking mad (rather like Corbyn’s aims today). The ERG only seem to know what they don’t want. Militant wanted power; the ERG seem to be happy with being back street drivers without the responsibility that goes with office. Militant tried to incite mobs to exert pressure on politicians to achieve their aims. The ERG seem to be a single issue group and rely exclusively on the referendum result to defend their actions but otherwise seem to eschew the need for popular support for what they do.
Militant were an existential threat to Labour before a Kinnock took them on. If ever we leave the EU, it’s tough to see the ERG continue as a viable group.
A dental student found guilty of sexually assaulting a six-year-old girl will face no punishment after being granted an absolute discharge.
Christopher Daniel, 18, denied carrying out numerous assaults on the girl while he was aged 15 to 17 and she was between six and eight.
He was granted the discharge by Sheriff Gerard Sinclair after being found guilty at Dumbarton sheriff court at the end of a three-day trial. It means that Daniel, from Glasgow, will not be placed on the sex offenders register and the guilty verdict was not recorded as a conviction.
The victim’s family were not allowed to see a report sent by the sheriff to the Crown Office explaining his “wholly exceptional” decision, an STV investigation has found. They believe that Daniel’s middle-class background, strong educational attainment and career prospects helped to convince the sheriff to grant the most lenient possible disposal.
Comments
Out in time for Mays Plan F
There will be a recall petition which needs about 7000 signatures to force a by election. Her barristers comments in mitigation that she has stayed an MP as it is her only source of income likely to be at the top of the clipboards for that
Now, how many people have I offended?
"Judge: what matters is that I am not sure that you passed the speeding ticket to your brother with the intention, expressly or otherwise, of perverting the course of justice."
"Judge: I sentence Festus on the basis that you were trying to avoid speeding points for yourself, not for your sister. There was no conspiracy between the two of you at the outset."
In this case, it seems to be the fact that she is a prominent public figure which swayed the judge. I view that as an aggravating factor, not a mitigating factor.
A solicitor and MP should have been held to a higher standard in this case. She perverted the course of justice. As an officer of the law and a law-maker, that is beyond the acceptable.
The judge has damaged justice today.
https://twitter.com/tombarton/status/1090231209525997569
https://twitter.com/tombarton/status/1090231994401898497
Christopher Daniel, 18, denied carrying out numerous assaults on the girl while he was aged 15 to 17 and she was between six and eight.
He was granted the discharge by Sheriff Gerard Sinclair after being found guilty at Dumbarton sheriff court at the end of a three-day trial. It means that Daniel, from Glasgow, will not be placed on the sex offenders register and the guilty verdict was not recorded as a conviction.
The victim’s family were not allowed to see a report sent by the sheriff to the Crown Office explaining his “wholly exceptional” decision, an STV investigation has found. They believe that Daniel’s middle-class background, strong educational attainment and career prospects helped to convince the sheriff to grant the most lenient possible disposal.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/student-guilty-of-sex-assault-on-girl-6-will-not-be-punished-rpzdx6bmv
The judge has got it wrong.
All major political parties, including Labour, have said they will campaign for Onasanya to be kicked out of parliament.
The six-week recall petition won’t be triggered unless and until her appeal against conviction is lost.
I'll get my coat.
https://twitter.com/BrunoBrussels/status/1090219163275218944
[And since this is PedanticBetting.com, are those final apostrophes misplaced? people's jobs rather than peoples' jobs? ]
My parents are next door in Rutland, will remind them to speak to anyone they know in Peterborough.
Hopefully someone will get a phone bank going and print some leaflets.
Strangely you never seem to post anything regarding the child rape gangs that seem to appear wherever a particular ideology is present.
Although given the political sensitivities of a Tory AG appearing to try to engineer a by election in a Labour held seat I cannot see it happening.
Corbyn first.
https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1090240172732624897?s=19
https://theneedleblog.wordpress.com/2013/02/19/the-bias-judge/
Coffee and late nights?
I can see that there are inevitable ways that being middle class will help you get more lenient treatment (and it overlaps with race). You'll have a good solicitor/barrister; he'll make sure you wear a suit, and address the judge and prosecution respectfully. He'll make sure you engage with the system, advising you to plead guilty if necessary, and to make a heartfelt statement in mitigation.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/06/08/oxford-university-student-avoided-prison-stabbing-boyfriend/
Just file under "things that make you go hmmmmmm....."
Militant were an existential threat to Labour before a Kinnock took them on. If ever we leave the EU, it’s tough to see the ERG continue as a viable group.
Sounds like a message for Trump ...