Now just a question of how well Le Pen might manage. Presumably much better than her dad's 17%, so time to improve on that for when Le Pen III has a go. Though having stumbled from topping the first round as long expected, perhaps it won't be as good a runner up as she'd like.
As previously noted, it's not correct that "we’ve not had any votes counted yet". Estimates in France are based on precisely that from a sample of polling stations, and NOT on asking people on the way out.
Well, petite merde. Would've preferred Fillon. What an arse. Refuses to go after I get a nice position on Juppe and Bayrou, then the incompetent weasel can't even knock out Le Pen.
Can someone explain Macron's apppeal? Seems bizarre France would now suddenly go for a Blair type figure given how discredited centrist politicans are elsewhere in the world.
Can someone explain Macron's apppeal? Seems bizarre France would now suddenly go for a Blair type figure given how discredited centrist politicans are elsewhere in the world.
He is not a crook, borderline Fascist, or to the Left of Corbyn? Also France has never had a Blairite figure.
Can someone explain Macron's apppeal? Seems bizarre France would now suddenly go for a Blair type figure given how discredited centrist politicans are elsewhere in the world.
Not everywhere, Trudeau is another centrist liberal like Macron and Le Pen has still got a higher total than FN have ever achieved before
Can someone explain Macron's apppeal? Seems bizarre France would now suddenly go for a Blair type figure given how discredited centrist politicans are elsewhere in the world.
Centrist politicians are slightly less discredited than the world's Leftist or Rightist politicians?
Can someone explain Macron's apppeal? Seems bizarre France would now suddenly go for a Blair type figure given how discredited centrist politicans are elsewhere in the world.
Not everywhere, Trudeau is another centrist liberal like Macron and Le Pen has still got a higher total than FN have ever achieved before
Also whilst there are some discredited Blairite types, how many examples are there of Blairite types being actually rejected at the polls? And certainly at the point where they have no record in office and remain a blank sheet.
Can someone explain Macron's apppeal? Seems bizarre France would now suddenly go for a Blair type figure given how discredited centrist politicans are elsewhere in the world.
Doesn't seem to have obvious downsides, France usually less centrist(?) so he stands out more, and relatively fresh so people are projecting a lot onto him in the face of other unappealing candidates.
If the last one, then he'll have a tough time of it moving forward (after he's won election, obviously)
The BBC are stating the Kantar figures 23 23 19 19
Clearly multiple 'exit polls'.
As long as the first two are correct, who cares. The Americans should learn from the French how to conduct elections. How to get rid of people with bad smell.
Can someone explain Macron's apppeal? Seems bizarre France would now suddenly go for a Blair type figure given how discredited centrist politicans are elsewhere in the world.
Not everywhere, Trudeau is another centrist liberal like Macron and Le Pen has still got a higher total than FN have ever achieved before
Also whilst there are some discredited Blairite types, how many examples are there of Blairite types being actually rejected at the polls? And certainly at the point where they have no record in office and remain a blank sheet.
PASOK in Greece maybe, Hillary was pretty Blairite
One of the exit polls has the two frontrunners neck and neck which makes things slightly more interesting.
I don't really understand why there would be more than one exit poll (of the 'vote count' variety). Surely the production of such a poll requires the granting of official access to the ballot papers, and if so why would the authorities want more than one of them? Or is it insurance against an outlier?
The BBC are stating the Kantar figures 23 23 19 19
Clearly multiple 'exit polls'.
As long as the first two are correct, who cares. The Americans should learn from the French how to conduct elections. How to get rid of people with bad smell.
How would the French system have got rid of either Trump or Clinton?
My guess is that the order in the first round would have been Trump, Clinton, Sanders, Cruz ... Unless a bunch of Dems deserted to Kasich, but why would they in Round 1?
Can someone explain Macron's apppeal? Seems bizarre France would now suddenly go for a Blair type figure given how discredited centrist politicans are elsewhere in the world.
Not everywhere, Trudeau is another centrist liberal like Macron and Le Pen has still got a higher total than FN have ever achieved before
Also whilst there are some discredited Blairite types, how many examples are there of Blairite types being actually rejected at the polls? And certainly at the point where they have no record in office and remain a blank sheet.
PASOK in Greece maybe, Hillary was pretty Blairite
I assumed we were discussing "Blair(ite) types", ie. fresh faced young politicians who seem to promise the world and allow the electorate to project their hopes on to them. I don't think Hillary quite qualifies...!
For a French political novice can someone please clarify - Macron is a president with no political party for the parliament?
Sounds like a complete shambles in the making.
He has a complete slate of candidates for the Assembly elections. How well they do is another question altogether. My guess is that he'll end up with about a third of the seats, with LR getting 40%, and the Socialists 10-15%. I expect the FN to do quite poorly (3-5) seats.
One of the exit polls has the two frontrunners neck and neck which makes things slightly more interesting.
I don't really understand why there would be more than one exit poll (of the 'vote count' variety). Surely the production of such a poll requires the granting of official access to the ballot papers, and if so why would the authorities want more than one of them? Or is it insurance against an outlier?
I agree, it's confusing. As you say only one of them can be based on the actual votes.
The BBC are stating the Kantar figures 23 23 19 19
Clearly multiple 'exit polls'.
As long as the first two are correct, who cares. The Americans should learn from the French how to conduct elections. How to get rid of people with bad smell.
Yeah, don't have as the only other option someone with the stale smell of decay.
Obviously at your own risk, but if you believe the level-pegging (at the top) poll, you can lay Macron to win round one at 1.13. I did that a bit, just to eliminate any redness.
One of the exit polls has the two frontrunners neck and neck which makes things slightly more interesting.
I don't really understand why there would be more than one exit poll (of the 'vote count' variety). Surely the production of such a poll requires the granting of official access to the ballot papers, and if so why would the authorities want more than one of them? Or is it insurance against an outlier?
From the Guardian article I got the impression that the raw, actual, polling figures are the same, but each pollster has their own proprietary weightings and assumptions to transform the raw figures to a prediction.
The Guardian article says historically these predictions are accurate to within a percentage point or so, but given that the early-closing polling stations that provided the figures are in rural and small town areas, which is Le Pen's best territory, maybe her position is being slightly overstated?
For a French political novice can someone please clarify - Macron is a president with no political party for the parliament?
Sounds like a complete shambles in the making.
Firstly, there will be a legislative election in June. Macron will put forward a bloc, and other parties will need to decide how they approach it. Presumably, more than one will take a constructive line - it's silly to go into an election saying "we will block everything that the new President YOU have elected wants to do" (unless you're the hard right or hard left).
Secondly, the French legislature is relatively weak and party system relatively fluid. There have been cohabitations in the past and although it certainly weakens the President, they are not sidelined.
I suspect it will work quite well. The Republicans will go in saying "we'll help Macron reform the economy... put some lead in his pencil". The Socialists will go in saying "we'll help Macron while reining him back on labour market reform". The Greens will go in saying "we'll help Macron and inject environmental conscience etc". The FN and Commies will go in saying "FU, Macron". Macron's bloc will say, "well, if you want a Macron presidency, elect a Macron MP".
For a French political novice can someone please clarify - Macron is a president with no political party for the parliament?
Sounds like a complete shambles in the making.
Firstly, there will be a legislative election in June. Macron will put forward a bloc, and other parties will need to decide how they approach it. Presumably, more than one will take a constructive line - it's silly to go into an election saying "we will block everything that the new President YOU have elected wants to do" (unless you're the hard right or hard left).
Secondly, the French legislature is relatively weak and party system relatively fluid. There have been cohabitations in the past and although it certainly weakens the President, they are not sidelined.
I suspect it will work quite well. The Republicans will go in saying "we'll help Macron reform the economy... put some lead in his pencil". The Socialists will go in saying "we'll help Macron while reining him back on labour market reform". The Greens will go in saying "we'll help Macron and inject environmental conscience etc". The FN and Commies will go in saying "FU, Macron". Macron's bloc will say, "well, if you want a Macron presidency, elect a Macron MP".
I expect the LR will win the legislative elections
Mr. Putney, if Labour lose over 70 seats (almost exactly Cannae, for those keeping up), then Lib Dems only getting 10, a gain of 2 from last time and 1 from current standings, is not great.
There's an issue with vanilla and wordpress at the moment.
When I publish directly via the website it is fine, when I use the app it causes multiple vanilla forum discussions
Yes, looks like an integration bug between the two. Vanilla is seeing the 'create discussion' request multiple times, if it only happens when using Wordpress app then that's probably the source. More likely to see it fixed by logging the bug with Vanilla though, as they're your paid supplier. They can probably do something server side like restrict posting new threads to one a minute.
This is a victory for optimism over pessimism. Over inclusion over exclusion. For Europe and not against Europe.
I want Macron to crush the Racist.
And, as a socialist I want Angela Merkel to win for her brave decisions in 2015. She saved many, many people. Good for her.
Je suis avec toi, mon ami!!
Pas moi - L' Allemange Merkel elle est fini.Combien sont arrivés en Allemagne sont maintenant en France - avec AK47s. Seulement 20% sont venus de Syrie.
Interestingly, Betfair Sportsbook's odds on the Conservatives for Richmond Park have lengthened a bit, from 5/4 to 6/4. Seems a little counter-intuitive, but there we are.
Comments
https://www.betfair.com/exchange/politics/event/28010557/market?marketId=1.117179983
Sounds like a complete shambles in the making.
Can watch at www.france24.com/en/livefeed
In English
For PfP:
http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/2015guide/labour-defence/
I've come up with the worse pun in history.
Clearly multiple 'exit polls'.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=1Ydto3Iyzic
Does anyone have a link to a good results page (with maps, figures etc.)?
Cheers!
Well, petite merde. Would've preferred Fillon. What an arse. Refuses to go after I get a nice position on Juppe and Bayrou, then the incompetent weasel can't even knock out Le Pen.
Fillon can filloff.
Mr. Eagles, cooler, six weeks.
Vive Macron!!!!!!!!!
Qu'un sang impur
Abreuve nos sillons!
Mr. Dodrade, probably about who he isn't more than who he is.
@SquareRoot @MTimT and @foxinsoxuk all claimed firsts!
'Le Pen is mightier the Le Fraud' still tops the charts.
https://www.thelocal.fr/20170423/interactive-map-of-the-2017-french-presidential-election
https://www.lefigaro.fr/elections/resultats/#PR2017
If the last one, then he'll have a tough time of it moving forward (after he's won election, obviously)
When I publish directly via the website it is fine, when I use the app it causes multiple vanilla forum discussions
I want Macron to crush the Racist.
And, as a socialist I want Angela Merkel to win for her brave decisions in 2015. She saved many, many people. Good for her.
Northfield 5.9% maj 4/6
Edgbaston 6.6% maj 4/11
Erdington 14.8 maj 5/6
I'd say that Northfield was too long and Erdington too short.
Northfield is significantly more wwc than the other two.
Or that might be laying Corbyn to be next PM.
My guess is that the order in the first round would have been Trump, Clinton, Sanders, Cruz ... Unless a bunch of Dems deserted to Kasich, but why would they in Round 1?
Not impressed
[ The best google could do ]
All we now need is for Scotland to be in it.
Party 2015 Votes 2015 Seats Pred Votes Pred Seats
CON........ 37.8%.............. 331................. 46.8%.............. 410
LAB......... 31.2% ............ 232 ................ 24.9% ............. 161
LIB Dems 8.1% ............... 8 .................... 11.2% ............. 10
The Guardian article says historically these predictions are accurate to within a percentage point or so, but given that the early-closing polling stations that provided the figures are in rural and small town areas, which is Le Pen's best territory, maybe her position is being slightly overstated?
Secondly, the French legislature is relatively weak and party system relatively fluid. There have been cohabitations in the past and although it certainly weakens the President, they are not sidelined.
I suspect it will work quite well. The Republicans will go in saying "we'll help Macron reform the economy... put some lead in his pencil". The Socialists will go in saying "we'll help Macron while reining him back on labour market reform". The Greens will go in saying "we'll help Macron and inject environmental conscience etc". The FN and Commies will go in saying "FU, Macron". Macron's bloc will say, "well, if you want a Macron presidency, elect a Macron MP".
See: https://www.thelocal.fr/20170423/interactive-map-of-the-2017-french-presidential-election
Cheers for those stats, by the way.
https://twitter.com/iainmartin1/status/856213473998639104
SUPREME EFFORT. Looks like the populist right is about to get smashed. Bring on Round Two.
LET'S ALL MOVE TO FRANCE.
meet the CGT
Macron 23.64%
Le Pen 22.06%
Fillon 19.66%
Mélenchon 19.52%
Hamon 6.36%
Dupont-Aignan 4.82%