Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Remember five months ago when Hammond thought he was unsackabl

1356789

Comments

  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,609
    edited March 2017
    felix said:

    IPSOS/Mori on the other hand say....Ratings of the party leaders show little change over the month, with the Prime Minister’s honeymoon showing no sign of ending.
    Anybody would think that TSE was pushing his own rather silly agenda here ... and getting nowhere. :)
    You're like a Trump supporter, I pointed out the facts, that her ratings had slide 4% but that she's still got a net positive rating.
  • Options
    BojabobBojabob Posts: 642
    Sean

    If they consider their job to be defeated they have indeed done it.
  • Options
    TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 40,299

    Maybe Ruth is the get-out, a sort of double act whereby Ruth campaigns at Westminster for a second referendum and May says not now.

    Risky. But a line.

    Ruth has certainly made her opinion on Westminster blocking a 2nd referendum very clear in the past, trouble is she's made her opinion clear on loads of things only to reverse ferret like an oiled mustelid.

    https://twitter.com/rosscolquhoun/status/841297117163474946
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,925
    Pulpstar said:

    If May was REALLY bold, she'd have just let the SNP get on with it.

    It's that kind of needless risk taking that cost Cameron his job one year after winning the general election?
  • Options
    Stark_DawningStark_Dawning Posts: 9,324
    Theresa and Phil drastically underestimated the vindictiveness and cunning of the Tory eurosceptic right - the likes of Redwood and Mogg couldn't give a fig about NI hikes, but they realized Phil wasn't a Brexit Ultra and leaped at the first opportunity to humiliate the man. Hammond is now a crumpled husk of a politician and will fall in step behind whatever plans they devise for the hardest of Brexits. Let that be a lesson.
  • Options
    AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670

    Alistair said:

    SeanT said:

    Alistair said:

    So will Mrs Sturgeon hold an unlawful referendum?

    It hasn't actually been ruled though has it?
    TMay was hardly gonna stand up and say "NO you stupid Scots can't ever have a referendum, yah boo McSucks."

    She will haver and hum, and keep saying Now is not quite the time, until Brexit is settled, for the good of all Brits, north and south, but Yes the Scots can then look at the alternatives in the clear light of a post-Brexit dawn, and when the Nats themselves have decided whether they want EU or EEA or EFTA, and are offering a clear choice.

    That position could be held until late 2019 at the earliest, maybe the early 2020s.

    She's got to realise how this will be reported/tweeted though right?
    It's being reported as: 'Now not the time' for independence vote

    Which coincides with Scottish opinion, doesn't it?......
    Of course

    https://twitter.com/Independent/status/842359876294737920
  • Options
    justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527

    The Tory lead of 13% becomes a lead of just 6% when all voters are included with Ipsos MORI


    https://www.ipsos-mori.com/researchpublications/researcharchive/3857/Satisfaction-with-Hammond-drops-as-does-economic-optimism.aspx

    Don't encourage Justin Short Straws...
    See my edit.
    Anything sub 10% is enough to get Justin excited about Labour's chances in 2020.
    Why should become excited by the prospects of a party for which I have no present intention of supporting and for which I have only voted once at a General Election since 1992?
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,175
    Pulpstar said:

    If May was REALLY bold, she'd have just let the SNP get on with it.

    Then undermine her Brexit negotiations, of course she can't until they are concluded.
  • Options
    felixfelix Posts: 15,125

    felix said:

    IPSOS/Mori on the other hand say....Ratings of the party leaders show little change over the month, with the Prime Minister’s honeymoon showing no sign of ending.
    Anybody would think that TSE was pushing his own rather silly agenda here ... and getting nowhere. :)
    You're like a Trump supporter, I pointed out the facts, that her ratings had slide 4% but that she's still got a net positive rating.
    That was such a quick edit - makes you seem rattled :)
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,791
    The budget:

    When it comes to the public’s views of the Budget overall, 38% say it was good for the country, and 42% bad. This is better than their views of last March’s budget (30% good, 53% bad), and a lot better than the reaction to the 2012 “omnishambles” budget (33% good, 53% bad).....

    https://www.ipsos-mori.com/researchpublications/researcharchive/3857/Satisfaction-with-Hammond-drops-as-does-economic-optimism.aspx
  • Options
    RecidivistRecidivist Posts: 4,679

    Cyclefree said:



    Europeans should be asking themselves some hard questions not behaving like Panglossian fools.

    For all dear old Blighty's faults our nearest equivalents - the BNP, or whatever they are these days are nowhere and Farage wouldn't touch Le Pen with a barge pole....
    Lol.

    http://www.lbc.co.uk/radio/presenters/nigel-farage/nigel-farage-meet-marine-le-pen-the-full-interview/
    Le Pen was on France24 this morning saying that Farage had shown the French the way to leave the EU. Farage has changed Britain, is changing the Tory Party and might well change the EU. I really wish he hadn't but I can't deny that he has.

  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,149
    Pulpstar said:

    If May was REALLY bold, she'd have just let the SNP get on with it.

    If she was REALLY REALLY bold she'd table legislation to repeal the Scotland Act and end devolution. Say that Brexit was a 'material change in circumstances' and it was better to make Westminster sovereign again.
  • Options
    logical_songlogical_song Posts: 9,728
    isam said:

    @JosiasJessop

    Oh and I don't know why you said "LOL" about me not reading the UKIP manifesto? I didn't read it! Why would I lie?!

    Maybe if you considered standing for the party you might have read the manifesto?
  • Options
    felix said:

    felix said:

    IPSOS/Mori on the other hand say....Ratings of the party leaders show little change over the month, with the Prime Minister’s honeymoon showing no sign of ending.
    Anybody would think that TSE was pushing his own rather silly agenda here ... and getting nowhere. :)
    You're like a Trump supporter, I pointed out the facts, that her ratings had slide 4% but that she's still got a net positive rating.
    That was such a quick edit - makes you seem rattled :)
    Rattled? I'm the epitome of calmness.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,002
    Anyone on Yorkhill in the first ?
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,013
    Mr. Gin, the terms of our departure from the EU will only be clear when negotiations have concluded...
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,791

    felix said:

    IPSOS/Mori on the other hand say....Ratings of the party leaders show little change over the month, with the Prime Minister’s honeymoon showing no sign of ending.
    Anybody would think that TSE was pushing his own rather silly agenda here ... and getting nowhere. :)
    You're like a Trump supporter, I pointed out the facts, that her ratings had slide 4% but that she's still got a net positive rating.
    Isn't it actually 2% - hence MOE?
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,002
    Bookies immediately cut Un De Sceaux into 7-4 just because Yorkhill wins the first. Arf.
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,149

    Mr. Gin, the terms of our departure from the EU will only be clear when negotiations have concluded...

    And there will be a fairly long period between that point and the exit agreement being ratified and coming into force.
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,013
    #IfTheresaWereREALLYBold

    She would've invaded Scotland with a sneak attack in the depths of winter.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,681

    Pulpstar said:

    If May was REALLY bold, she'd have just let the SNP get on with it.

    If she was REALLY REALLY bold she'd table legislation to repeal the Scotland Act and end devolution. Say that Brexit was a 'material change in circumstances' and it was better to make Westminster sovereign again.
    If May was REALLY REALLY REALLY bold she'd march up to Bannockburn at the head of an all English army and give the Scots a damn good thrashing, before executing the SNP and installing Gove as Governor.
  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    The most difficult point for Theresa May is that Nicola Sturgeon clearly does have a mandate for what she's asking for. In a week when the Westminster government has had to backtrack from breaking a manifesto commitment, the juxtaposition is at the very least unfortunate.
  • Options

    felix said:

    IPSOS/Mori on the other hand say....Ratings of the party leaders show little change over the month, with the Prime Minister’s honeymoon showing no sign of ending.
    Anybody would think that TSE was pushing his own rather silly agenda here ... and getting nowhere. :)
    You're like a Trump supporter, I pointed out the facts, that her ratings had slide 4% but that she's still got a net positive rating.
    Isn't it actually 2% - hence MOE?
    It is a 4% fall overall, 2% is just the swing. So no, not MOE.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,175

    The most difficult point for Theresa May is that Nicola Sturgeon clearly does have a mandate for what she's asking for. In a week when the Westminster government has had to backtrack from breaking a manifesto commitment, the juxtaposition is at the very least unfortunate.

    Not while the Brexit negotiations are ongoing she doesn't, as every Scottish poll shows
  • Options
    Now this is what you called rattled.

    https://twitter.com/MediaGuido/status/842371581284372481
  • Options
    Get on and hold your own referendum Nicola

    Report from the HOL that they would block referendum legislation at this time
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,791

    felix said:

    IPSOS/Mori on the other hand say....Ratings of the party leaders show little change over the month, with the Prime Minister’s honeymoon showing no sign of ending.
    Anybody would think that TSE was pushing his own rather silly agenda here ... and getting nowhere. :)
    You're like a Trump supporter, I pointed out the facts, that her ratings had slide 4% but that she's still got a net positive rating.
    Isn't it actually 2% - hence MOE?
    It is a 4% fall overall, 2% is just the swing. So no, not MOE.
    IPSOS Mori say 'essentially unchanged'.......
  • Options
    SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    GIN1138 said:

    Nicola's view:

    https://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842365797259456512

    ttps://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842365995704549376

    ttps://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842366199212191744

    ttps://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842366483049123840

    I’ve no idea what game Sturgeon is playing at, the terms of Brexit will not be known until the EU negotiations are completed, Sturgeon must know this.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,175
    edited March 2017

    Pulpstar said:

    If May was REALLY bold, she'd have just let the SNP get on with it.

    If she was REALLY REALLY bold she'd table legislation to repeal the Scotland Act and end devolution. Say that Brexit was a 'material change in circumstances' and it was better to make Westminster sovereign again.
    If May was REALLY REALLY REALLY bold she'd march up to Bannockburn at the head of an all English army and give the Scots a damn good thrashing, before executing the SNP and installing Gove as Governor.
    Though perhaps Juncker would then land an EU army at Pevensey while she was away and install Clegg as head of a puppet state! (Culloden would probably have been the better destination for May)
  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    HYUFD said:

    The most difficult point for Theresa May is that Nicola Sturgeon clearly does have a mandate for what she's asking for. In a week when the Westminster government has had to backtrack from breaking a manifesto commitment, the juxtaposition is at the very least unfortunate.

    Not while the Brexit negotiations are ongoing she doesn't, as every Scottish poll shows
    From the 2016 SNP manifesto:

    "We believe that the Scottish Parliament should have the right to hold another referendum if there is clear and sustained evidence that independence has become the preferred option of a majority of the Scottish people – or if there is a significant and material change in the
    circumstances that prevailed in 2014, such as Scotland being taken out of the EU against our will."
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,681
    HYUFD said:

    Pulpstar said:

    If May was REALLY bold, she'd have just let the SNP get on with it.

    If she was REALLY REALLY bold she'd table legislation to repeal the Scotland Act and end devolution. Say that Brexit was a 'material change in circumstances' and it was better to make Westminster sovereign again.
    If May was REALLY REALLY REALLY bold she'd march up to Bannockburn at the head of an all English army and give the Scots a damn good thrashing, before executing the SNP and installing Gove as Governor.
    Though perhaps Juncker would then land an EU army at Pevensey while she was away and install Clegg as head of a puppet state! (Culloden would probably have been the better destination for May)
    Lol.
  • Options
    david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,422

    Pulpstar said:


    Getting May to be seen to be blocking Sindy II is nigh on perfect for her.

    The minute Article 50 is declared, it will also be much easier for the Scottish government to drag the EU into the argument. From that point of view Nicola's timing is perfect.
    Dragging the EU into it would be a double-edged sword. They might make all sorts of unhelpful comments about deficits and currencies.

    Has to be remembered that for the EU, Scotland is pretty marginal. It'd add 1% to the Union's population. There might be some goodwill there - why wouldn't you be nice to someone who wants to join? - but the main game would still be Brussels-London.

    In fact, the speed with which the SNP changed their EU policy in (indirect) response to a policy change in London demonstrates the whole fallacy behind the independence argument: small countries are never properly independent because they bounce around in the wake of the large ones. The whole 'equality and respect' agenda is a delusional chimera; you can never have equality between a countries of 5m and 60m people where the level of development is roughly the same. Even independent, Scotland's policies would still be hugely influenced by what was decided in London.
  • Options

    HYUFD said:

    The most difficult point for Theresa May is that Nicola Sturgeon clearly does have a mandate for what she's asking for. In a week when the Westminster government has had to backtrack from breaking a manifesto commitment, the juxtaposition is at the very least unfortunate.

    Not while the Brexit negotiations are ongoing she doesn't, as every Scottish poll shows
    From the 2016 SNP manifesto:

    "We believe that the Scottish Parliament should have the right to hold another referendum if there is clear and sustained evidence that independence has become the preferred option of a majority of the Scottish people – or if there is a significant and material change in the
    circumstances that prevailed in 2014, such as Scotland being taken out of the EU against our will."
    That is their right but the legal process belongs to Westminster
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,149

    GIN1138 said:

    Nicola's view:

    https://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842365797259456512

    ttps://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842365995704549376

    ttps://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842366199212191744

    ttps://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842366483049123840

    I’ve no idea what game Sturgeon is playing at, the terms of Brexit will not be known until the EU negotiations are completed, Sturgeon must know this.
    And when will that be? Theresa May's timetable exactly fits Sturgeon's proposed dates. If those dates are unrealistic, it means the negotiations themselves are unrealistic.
  • Options
    RecidivistRecidivist Posts: 4,679

    Pulpstar said:

    If May was REALLY bold, she'd have just let the SNP get on with it.

    If she was REALLY REALLY bold she'd table legislation to repeal the Scotland Act and end devolution. Say that Brexit was a 'material change in circumstances' and it was better to make Westminster sovereign again.
    And if she was REALLY REALLY REALLY bold she'd announce England was pulling out of the UK and Scotland could stay on in the EU as the remnant. When the Scots see how great it is outside the EU they could have a referendum and join England again.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,791

    HYUFD said:

    The most difficult point for Theresa May is that Nicola Sturgeon clearly does have a mandate for what she's asking for. In a week when the Westminster government has had to backtrack from breaking a manifesto commitment, the juxtaposition is at the very least unfortunate.

    Not while the Brexit negotiations are ongoing she doesn't, as every Scottish poll shows
    clear and sustained evidence that independence has become the preferred option of a majority of the Scottish people "
    Where's the 'clear and sustained evidence'?
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,175

    HYUFD said:

    Pulpstar said:

    If May was REALLY bold, she'd have just let the SNP get on with it.

    If she was REALLY REALLY bold she'd table legislation to repeal the Scotland Act and end devolution. Say that Brexit was a 'material change in circumstances' and it was better to make Westminster sovereign again.
    If May was REALLY REALLY REALLY bold she'd march up to Bannockburn at the head of an all English army and give the Scots a damn good thrashing, before executing the SNP and installing Gove as Governor.
    Though perhaps Juncker would then land an EU army at Pevensey while she was away and install Clegg as head of a puppet state! (Culloden would probably have been the better destination for May)
    Lol.
    Thanks
  • Options
    felixfelix Posts: 15,125

    felix said:

    IPSOS/Mori on the other hand say....Ratings of the party leaders show little change over the month, with the Prime Minister’s honeymoon showing no sign of ending.
    Anybody would think that TSE was pushing his own rather silly agenda here ... and getting nowhere. :)
    You're like a Trump supporter, I pointed out the facts, that her ratings had slide 4% but that she's still got a net positive rating.
    Isn't it actually 2% - hence MOE?
    He's a 'mess in a dress' today posting too quickly - missing words - grammar so bad you can tell what sort of school he didn't go to...:)
  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340

    HYUFD said:

    The most difficult point for Theresa May is that Nicola Sturgeon clearly does have a mandate for what she's asking for. In a week when the Westminster government has had to backtrack from breaking a manifesto commitment, the juxtaposition is at the very least unfortunate.

    Not while the Brexit negotiations are ongoing she doesn't, as every Scottish poll shows
    clear and sustained evidence that independence has become the preferred option of a majority of the Scottish people "
    Where's the 'clear and sustained evidence'?

    "or if there is a significant and material change in the circumstances that prevailed in 2014, such as Scotland being taken out of the EU against our will."
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,849
    Not to mention the inappropriate comma usage.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,175
    edited March 2017

    HYUFD said:

    The most difficult point for Theresa May is that Nicola Sturgeon clearly does have a mandate for what she's asking for. In a week when the Westminster government has had to backtrack from breaking a manifesto commitment, the juxtaposition is at the very least unfortunate.

    Not while the Brexit negotiations are ongoing she doesn't, as every Scottish poll shows
    From the 2016 SNP manifesto:

    "We believe that the Scottish Parliament should have the right to hold another referendum if there is clear and sustained evidence that independence has become the preferred option of a majority of the Scottish people – or if there is a significant and material change in the
    circumstances that prevailed in 2014, such as Scotland being taken out of the EU against our will."
    Yes and most polls still show Scots opposed to independence and supportive of May taking the UK out of the EU now the referendum has been completed
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,791
    felix said:
    As Ruthie observed she's 'Gone the Full Trump'.....
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,149

    GIN1138 said:

    Nicola's view:

    https://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842365797259456512

    ttps://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842365995704549376

    ttps://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842366199212191744

    ttps://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842366483049123840

    I’ve no idea what game Sturgeon is playing at, the terms of Brexit will not be known until the EU negotiations are completed, Sturgeon must know this.
    And when will that be? Theresa May's timetable exactly fits Sturgeon's proposed dates. If those dates are unrealistic, it means the negotiations themselves are unrealistic.
    As I was saying:

    https://twitter.com/nicolasturgeon/status/842372721522675712
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,791

    HYUFD said:

    The most difficult point for Theresa May is that Nicola Sturgeon clearly does have a mandate for what she's asking for. In a week when the Westminster government has had to backtrack from breaking a manifesto commitment, the juxtaposition is at the very least unfortunate.

    Not while the Brexit negotiations are ongoing she doesn't, as every Scottish poll shows
    clear and sustained evidence that independence has become the preferred option of a majority of the Scottish people "
    Where's the 'clear and sustained evidence'?

    "or if there is a significant and material change in the circumstances that prevailed in 2014, such as Scotland being taken out of the EU against our will."
    But she's no longer proposing to "stay in"/rejoin the EU.....
  • Options

    GIN1138 said:

    Nicola's view:

    https://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842365797259456512

    ttps://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842365995704549376

    ttps://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842366199212191744

    ttps://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842366483049123840

    I’ve no idea what game Sturgeon is playing at, the terms of Brexit will not be known until the EU negotiations are completed, Sturgeon must know this.
    And when will that be? Theresa May's timetable exactly fits Sturgeon's proposed dates. If those dates are unrealistic, it means the negotiations themselves are unrealistic.
    As I was saying:

    https://twitter.com/nicolasturgeon/status/842372721522675712
    This will just go back and forward for months as everyone switches off.

    The second Scots referendum will not take place in Nicola's timetable. She needs to get back to her day job
  • Options
    TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 40,299
    "Stop blocking the Scottish people from having their say" - David Mundell

    Oops, sorry, that was 2013.

    http://tinyurl.com/h8q7wto

    Actually, Mundell may be a significant factor in Tory hesitation about a 2nd ref. Imagine having to depend on him as one of your big beasts?
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,298
    Nigelb said:

    Not to mention the inappropriate comma usage.
    Can't get the staff these days.
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 41,008

    isam said:

    @JosiasJessop

    Oh and I don't know why you said "LOL" about me not reading the UKIP manifesto? I didn't read it! Why would I lie?!

    Maybe if you considered standing for the party you might have read the manifesto?
    I had decided not to stand long before the manifesto came out
  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340

    HYUFD said:

    The most difficult point for Theresa May is that Nicola Sturgeon clearly does have a mandate for what she's asking for. In a week when the Westminster government has had to backtrack from breaking a manifesto commitment, the juxtaposition is at the very least unfortunate.

    Not while the Brexit negotiations are ongoing she doesn't, as every Scottish poll shows
    clear and sustained evidence that independence has become the preferred option of a majority of the Scottish people "
    Where's the 'clear and sustained evidence'?

    "or if there is a significant and material change in the circumstances that prevailed in 2014, such as Scotland being taken out of the EU against our will."
    But she's no longer proposing to "stay in"/rejoin the EU.....
    She's trying to salvage something from the wreckage. There's nothing in that wording which requires her to secure Scotland's re-entry into the EU (unsurprisingly, because it wouldn't be within an independent Scotland's powers to guarantee that).

    She has her mandate, however inconvenient that might be for the Westminster government.
  • Options

    "Stop blocking the Scottish people from having their say" - David Mundell

    Oops, sorry, that was 2013.

    http://tinyurl.com/h8q7wto

    Actually, Mundell may be a significant factor in Tory hesitation about a 2nd ref. Imagine having to depend on him as one of your big beasts?

    What do you say to the 93% Scots fishermen who want out and support Theresa May's stance
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,013
    Mr. Divvie, you recall there was a referendum held a year after that?

    Anyway, seeing as most of the day has been spent faffing about (my thanks to Mr. Sandpit for his assistance) I'm off for a bit. Play nicely, children.
  • Options
    AnneJGPAnneJGP Posts: 2,869
    SeanT said:

    Alistair said:

    SeanT said:

    Alistair said:

    So will Mrs Sturgeon hold an unlawful referendum?

    It hasn't actually been ruled though has it?
    TMay was hardly gonna stand up and say "NO you stupid Scots can't ever have a referendum, yah boo McSucks."

    She will haver and hum, and keep saying Now is not quite the time, until Brexit is settled, for the good of all Brits, north and south, but Yes the Scots can then look at the alternatives in the clear light of a post-Brexit dawn, and when the Nats themselves have decided whether they want EU or EEA or EFTA, and are offering a clear choice.

    That position could be held until late 2019 at the earliest, maybe the early 2020s.

    She's got to realise how this will be reported/tweeted though right? It's going to be wall to wall "May blocks referendum" and then a larification will have to be issued and then it will be wall to wall "May u-turns and approves Referenedum"
    No, she will say "No referendum right now but of course Scotland has the right to choose its destiny when we have finished Brexiting"

    London and Edinburgh had to agree on the timing of indyref 1, this is no different.

    Either way, it's just journalism at the moment. I doubt it will move votes very much. Views are entrenched after indyref1, and most Scots don't want a vote before Brexit. So, despite much huffing and puffing, I reckon everyone will breathe a quiet sigh of relief (probably including Sturgeon, who reportedly fears she is likely to lose as things stand).

    We will Brexit. Then we will all think again. And now I must work.
    How about Mrs May encourages Ms Sturgeon to hold a full-electorate poll of opinion on the question so they will have a better guide than they already have?

    Good afternoon, everyone.
  • Options
    TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 40,299

    "Stop blocking the Scottish people from having their say" - David Mundell

    Oops, sorry, that was 2013.

    http://tinyurl.com/h8q7wto

    Actually, Mundell may be a significant factor in Tory hesitation about a 2nd ref. Imagine having to depend on him as one of your big beasts?

    What do you say to the 93% Scots fishermen who want out and support Theresa May's stance
    I'd say that they have a right for their views to be listened to and taken into account.
    Unlike yours.
  • Options

    "Stop blocking the Scottish people from having their say" - David Mundell

    Oops, sorry, that was 2013.

    http://tinyurl.com/h8q7wto

    Actually, Mundell may be a significant factor in Tory hesitation about a 2nd ref. Imagine having to depend on him as one of your big beasts?

    What do you say to the 93% Scots fishermen who want out and support Theresa May's stance
    I'd say that they have a right for their views to be listened to and taken into account.
    Unlike yours.
    Their views are my views - they are my family
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,925

    GIN1138 said:

    Nicola's view:

    https://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842365797259456512

    ttps://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842365995704549376

    ttps://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842366199212191744

    ttps://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842366483049123840

    I’ve no idea what game Sturgeon is playing at, the terms of Brexit will not be known until the EU negotiations are completed, Sturgeon must know this.
    And when will that be? Theresa May's timetable exactly fits Sturgeon's proposed dates. If those dates are unrealistic, it means the negotiations themselves are unrealistic.
    As I was saying:

    https://twitter.com/nicolasturgeon/status/842372721522675712
    We won't know the full "terms" until around two minutes past midnight, two years from whenever A50 is triggered.

    These things always go down to and beyond the last minute.
  • Options
    David_EvershedDavid_Evershed Posts: 6,506

    HYUFD said:

    The most difficult point for Theresa May is that Nicola Sturgeon clearly does have a mandate for what she's asking for. In a week when the Westminster government has had to backtrack from breaking a manifesto commitment, the juxtaposition is at the very least unfortunate.

    Not while the Brexit negotiations are ongoing she doesn't, as every Scottish poll shows
    clear and sustained evidence that independence has become the preferred option of a majority of the Scottish people "
    Where's the 'clear and sustained evidence'?

    "or if there is a significant and material change in the circumstances that prevailed in 2014, such as Scotland being taken out of the EU against our will."
    But she's no longer proposing to "stay in"/rejoin the EU.....
    She's trying to salvage something from the wreckage. There's nothing in that wording which requires her to secure Scotland's re-entry into the EU (unsurprisingly, because it wouldn't be within an independent Scotland's powers to guarantee that).

    She has her mandate, however inconvenient that might be for the Westminster government.
    Which man date is that?
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,002
    GIN1138 said:

    GIN1138 said:

    Nicola's view:

    https://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842365797259456512

    ttps://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842365995704549376

    ttps://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842366199212191744

    ttps://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842366483049123840

    I’ve no idea what game Sturgeon is playing at, the terms of Brexit will not be known until the EU negotiations are completed, Sturgeon must know this.
    And when will that be? Theresa May's timetable exactly fits Sturgeon's proposed dates. If those dates are unrealistic, it means the negotiations themselves are unrealistic.
    As I was saying:

    https://twitter.com/nicolasturgeon/status/842372721522675712
    We won't know the full "terms" until around two minutes past midnight, two years from whenever A50 is triggered.

    These things always go down to and beyond the last minute.
    Probably end up staying in !
  • Options
    GIN1138 said:

    GIN1138 said:

    Nicola's view:

    https://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842365797259456512

    ttps://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842365995704549376

    ttps://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842366199212191744

    ttps://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842366483049123840

    I’ve no idea what game Sturgeon is playing at, the terms of Brexit will not be known until the EU negotiations are completed, Sturgeon must know this.
    And when will that be? Theresa May's timetable exactly fits Sturgeon's proposed dates. If those dates are unrealistic, it means the negotiations themselves are unrealistic.
    As I was saying:

    https://twitter.com/nicolasturgeon/status/842372721522675712
    We won't know the full "terms" until around two minutes past midnight, two years from whenever A50 is triggered.

    These things always go down to and beyond the last minute.
    And any transition period mutually agreed
  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383
    I know we've a few fans of Dave Rubin on here. His sit-down with David Horowitz is very interesting re the Left and why many liberal thinkers have abandoned it

    Horowitz was a card carrying Marxist and Black Panther supporter

    Part One

    https://youtu.be/2gvCi86XuUw
  • Options
    TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 40,299
    Fluffy shows more balls than Tessy!

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/842376117617086465
  • Options
    JasonJason Posts: 1,614
    Be interesting to see the next set of national polling figures. After a car crash week, if there's no dent in the Tory lead , or even only a few points, then they really are untouchable.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,298
    edited March 2017
    Jason said:

    Be interesting to see the next set of national polling figures. After a car crash week, if there's no dent in the Tory lead , or even only a few points, then they really are untouchable.

    Down thread....Tory lead 13%, lead up by 2%. Mirroring other recent polling that still shows very large Tory leads with no obvious changes pre / post budget.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,002
    edited March 2017
    Had a very small bet on Tobefair. An intriguing horse, has had 7 wins on the trot !
  • Options
    felixfelix Posts: 15,125

    HYUFD said:

    The most difficult point for Theresa May is that Nicola Sturgeon clearly does have a mandate for what she's asking for. In a week when the Westminster government has had to backtrack from breaking a manifesto commitment, the juxtaposition is at the very least unfortunate.

    Not while the Brexit negotiations are ongoing she doesn't, as every Scottish poll shows
    clear and sustained evidence that independence has become the preferred option of a majority of the Scottish people "
    Where's the 'clear and sustained evidence'?

    "or if there is a significant and material change in the circumstances that prevailed in 2014, such as Scotland being taken out of the EU against our will."
    But she's no longer proposing to "stay in"/rejoin the EU.....
    She's trying to salvage something from the wreckage. There's nothing in that wording which requires her to secure Scotland's re-entry into the EU (unsurprisingly, because it wouldn't be within an independent Scotland's powers to guarantee that).

    She has her mandate, however inconvenient that might be for the Westminster government.
    For some on here it's still all about Brexit..........
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,978
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    The most difficult point for Theresa May is that Nicola Sturgeon clearly does have a mandate for what she's asking for. In a week when the Westminster government has had to backtrack from breaking a manifesto commitment, the juxtaposition is at the very least unfortunate.

    Not while the Brexit negotiations are ongoing she doesn't, as every Scottish poll shows
    From the 2016 SNP manifesto:

    "We believe that the Scottish Parliament should have the right to hold another referendum if there is clear and sustained evidence that independence has become the preferred option of a majority of the Scottish people – or if there is a significant and material change in the
    circumstances that prevailed in 2014, such as Scotland being taken out of the EU against our will."
    Yes and most polls still show Scots opposed to independence and supportive of May taking the UK out of the EU now the referendum has been completed

    Of course - what suits Sturgeon more than anything is the continuance of politics not as normal in Scotland. She will get her referendum in 2021 and between now and then everything in Scotland will be seen through that prism. Sturgeon now has a window to build a narrative, and while the EU climb-down may be embarrassing in the short term it actually leaves the SNP with a far more defendable position longer term. And none of it removes the essential and unavoidable fact: despite the collapse in the oil price and the undoubted economic hardship independence will deliver in the short and medium term, around 45% of Scots currently want it to happen. Nicola now has a window to work on the few more she needs to get over the line. With hard Brexit looming and the English set to give the Tories a big majority at the next general election, she will be confident.

  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    felix said:

    HYUFD said:

    The most difficult point for Theresa May is that Nicola Sturgeon clearly does have a mandate for what she's asking for. In a week when the Westminster government has had to backtrack from breaking a manifesto commitment, the juxtaposition is at the very least unfortunate.

    Not while the Brexit negotiations are ongoing she doesn't, as every Scottish poll shows
    clear and sustained evidence that independence has become the preferred option of a majority of the Scottish people "
    Where's the 'clear and sustained evidence'?

    "or if there is a significant and material change in the circumstances that prevailed in 2014, such as Scotland being taken out of the EU against our will."
    But she's no longer proposing to "stay in"/rejoin the EU.....
    She's trying to salvage something from the wreckage. There's nothing in that wording which requires her to secure Scotland's re-entry into the EU (unsurprisingly, because it wouldn't be within an independent Scotland's powers to guarantee that).

    She has her mandate, however inconvenient that might be for the Westminster government.
    For some on here it's still all about Brexit..........
    It has to be said it's remarkable the number of Leavers who are struggling with the plain English of the SNP's manifesto statement on the subject of a second independence referendum. Democratic principles go out of the window if might make Brexit more complicated.
  • Options
    TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 40,299
    'Ok David, we've decided you're just the right chap to break it to your fellow haggis munchers. It'll be fine, honest.'

    https://twitter.com/BBCsarahsmith/status/842376388594274304
  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    The Dutch election result has been settled on Betfair.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,791
  • Options
    Footsie at all time high - pound rising and Toyota announced 240 million pound investment in it's UK plants despite Brexit
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    edited March 2017
    I regret to say that the May administration that began with potential is now looking lamer as each week passes.

    BREXIT is being handled with all the aplomb of a "Spreadsheet Phil" budget, that itself unraveled quicker than a Paul Nuttall CV and to cap a week of sparkling ineptitude this afternoon the Prime Minister hands the SNP an electoral golden hand.

    How Mrs May must thank the gods that across the dispatch box she is faced with a LotO even more incompetent, and then some, than she has proven to be over these recent weeks.

    I can't help feeling that David Cameron has been exercising his chuckle muscles recently and who could blame him.

    As someone was wont to say :

    "Things can only get better ..."

  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,791
    I'm sure the Nats will be much heartened by this endorsement....

    https://twitter.com/D_Blanchflower/status/842379277660246016
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,002

    The Dutch election result has been settled on Betfair.

    The premium charge looms ever closer.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,978
    JackW said:

    I regret to say that the May administration that began with potential is now looking lamer as each week passes.

    BREXIT is being handled with all the aplomb of a "Spreadsheet Phil" budget, that itself unraveled quicker than a Paul Nuttall CV and to cap a week of sparkling ineptitude this afternoon the Prime Minister hands the SNP an electoral golden hand.

    How Mrs May must thank the gods that across the dispatch box she is faced with a LotO even more incompetent, and then some, than she has proven to be over these recent weeks.

    I can't help feeling that David Cameron has been exercising his chuckle muscles recently and who could blame him.

    As someone was wont to say :

    "Things can only get better ..."

    Yep - it looks to me like May is doing precisely what Sturgeon wants her to do. Four more years of politics not as normal north of the border. The terms of the next Scottish assembly election have already been framed - and in exactly the way that the SNP would hope. In fact, that will now become a de facto independence poll.

  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,298

    I'm sure the Nats will be much heartened by this endorsement....

    https://twitter.com/D_Blanchflower/status/842379277660246016

    What with 5 million unemployed and all that...
  • Options
    SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    edited March 2017
    Classic! Wasn’t Salmond a First Minister and party leader once upon a time, what happened?
  • Options
    Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 31,023

    GIN1138 said:

    Nicola's view:

    https://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842365797259456512

    ttps://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842365995704549376

    ttps://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842366199212191744

    ttps://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842366483049123840

    I’ve no idea what game Sturgeon is playing at, the terms of Brexit will not be known until the EU negotiations are completed, Sturgeon must know this.
    And when will that be? Theresa May's timetable exactly fits Sturgeon's proposed dates. If those dates are unrealistic, it means the negotiations themselves are unrealistic.
    As I was saying:

    https://twitter.com/nicolasturgeon/status/842372721522675712
    Why should she or the EU know the terms of Brexit when negotiations are still ongoing? Sturgeon is talking bollocks.
  • Options
    John_MJohn_M Posts: 7,503

    felix said:

    On a technical note - bank rate unchanged but one member voted for a rise - maybe a straw in the wind but it pushed the £ up more than half a cent against the $ and the € in minutes.

    I don't believe that is the first time a member has voted that way.
    Good afternoon all.

    It's actually only the first time since mid-2016, so hardly an epochal event.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,978

    I'm sure the Nats will be much heartened by this endorsement....

    https://twitter.com/D_Blanchflower/status/842379277660246016

    What a plonker.

  • Options

    JackW said:

    I regret to say that the May administration that began with potential is now looking lamer as each week passes.

    BREXIT is being handled with all the aplomb of a "Spreadsheet Phil" budget, that itself unraveled quicker than a Paul Nuttall CV and to cap a week of sparkling ineptitude this afternoon the Prime Minister hands the SNP an electoral golden hand.

    How Mrs May must thank the gods that across the dispatch box she is faced with a LotO even more incompetent, and then some, than she has proven to be over these recent weeks.

    I can't help feeling that David Cameron has been exercising his chuckle muscles recently and who could blame him.

    As someone was wont to say :

    "Things can only get better ..."

    Yep - it looks to me like May is doing precisely what Sturgeon wants her to do. Four more years of politics not as normal north of the border. The terms of the next Scottish assembly election have already been framed - and in exactly the way that the SNP would hope. In fact, that will now become a de facto independence poll.

    In 2021 after UK election in 2020. The debate will have driven everyone crackers by then
  • Options
    David_EvershedDavid_Evershed Posts: 6,506

    "Stop blocking the Scottish people from having their say" - David Mundell

    Oops, sorry, that was 2013.

    http://tinyurl.com/h8q7wto

    Actually, Mundell may be a significant factor in Tory hesitation about a 2nd ref. Imagine having to depend on him as one of your big beasts?

    What do you say to the 93% Scots fishermen who want out and support Theresa May's stance
    I'd say that they have a right for their views to be listened to and taken into account.
    Unlike yours.
    Their views are my views - they are my family
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBpYgpF1bqQ

    RIP Sister Sledge.
  • Options
    JasonJason Posts: 1,614
    edited March 2017

    Jason said:

    Be interesting to see the next set of national polling figures. After a car crash week, if there's no dent in the Tory lead , or even only a few points, then they really are untouchable.

    Down thread....Tory lead 13%, lead up by 2%. Mirroring other recent polling that still shows very large Tory leads with no obvious changes pre / post budget.
    I was thinking after the election expenses story and Hammond's U-turn. They've only really hit the fan the last couple of days. Can't believe there won't be some damage, even just short term. If there are convictions, that will change everything.
  • Options

    "Stop blocking the Scottish people from having their say" - David Mundell

    Oops, sorry, that was 2013.

    http://tinyurl.com/h8q7wto

    Actually, Mundell may be a significant factor in Tory hesitation about a 2nd ref. Imagine having to depend on him as one of your big beasts?

    What do you say to the 93% Scots fishermen who want out and support Theresa May's stance
    I'd say that they have a right for their views to be listened to and taken into account.
    Unlike yours.
    Their views are my views - they are my family
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBpYgpF1bqQ

    RIP Sister Sledge.
    Impressed
  • Options
    Carolus_RexCarolus_Rex Posts: 1,414
    Pulpstar said:

    The Dutch election result has been settled on Betfair.

    The premium charge looms ever closer.
    Can someone explain the premium charge in language an idiot can understand? I tried reading up on it the other day and it made my head hurt.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,791
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,298
    edited March 2017
    Jason said:

    Jason said:

    Be interesting to see the next set of national polling figures. After a car crash week, if there's no dent in the Tory lead , or even only a few points, then they really are untouchable.

    Down thread....Tory lead 13%, lead up by 2%. Mirroring other recent polling that still shows very large Tory leads with no obvious changes pre / post budget.
    I was thinking after the election expenses story and Hamond's U-turn. They've only really hit the fan the last couple of days. Can't believe there won't be some damage, even just short term. If there are convictions, that will change everything.
    If the NIC thing was going to hit the polls it would have post-budget. The election expenses fines, I doubt it, they will be lost in the noise of SIndy, France shooting, kid walking in on her dad giving an interview to BBC...if there are criminal trials thats a different kettle of fish...

    The government is dead lucky that Corbyn Labour party is so bad. As I said at the time, with the NI changes, 1% more NI vs Labour's 50p tax rate + a 20% wealth tax, most people are going to shrug go, mutter about lying politicians breaking manifesto promises and go for the 1% more in NI.

    It wasn't the public polling that caused the U-Turn, it was the government's own MPs and possibility they could rebel in a separate bill.
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,149

    GIN1138 said:

    Nicola's view:

    https://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842365797259456512

    ttps://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842365995704549376

    ttps://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842366199212191744

    ttps://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842366483049123840

    I’ve no idea what game Sturgeon is playing at, the terms of Brexit will not be known until the EU negotiations are completed, Sturgeon must know this.
    And when will that be? Theresa May's timetable exactly fits Sturgeon's proposed dates. If those dates are unrealistic, it means the negotiations themselves are unrealistic.
    As I was saying:

    https://twitter.com/nicolasturgeon/status/842372721522675712
    Why should she or the EU know the terms of Brexit when negotiations are still ongoing? Sturgeon is talking bollocks.
    That's the point. If negotiations are still ongoing, it means the timetable will have to be extended.
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,951
    She's not telling "Scotland" anything.

    She's telling the SNP that they had their referendum not 30 months ago, the UK is about to enter a difficult period of negotiation with the EU, and that Nicola and friends should spend a few years doing the day job of using the powers they have to make a better Scotland.
  • Options
    SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,713

    Classic! Wasn’t Salmond a First Minister and party leader once upon a time, what happened?
    RUE THE DAY.

    A PB Classic is trotted out.
  • Options

    GIN1138 said:

    Nicola's view:

    https://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842365797259456512

    ttps://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842365995704549376

    ttps://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842366199212191744

    ttps://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/842366483049123840

    I’ve no idea what game Sturgeon is playing at, the terms of Brexit will not be known until the EU negotiations are completed, Sturgeon must know this.
    And when will that be? Theresa May's timetable exactly fits Sturgeon's proposed dates. If those dates are unrealistic, it means the negotiations themselves are unrealistic.
    As I was saying:

    https://twitter.com/nicolasturgeon/status/842372721522675712
    Why should she or the EU know the terms of Brexit when negotiations are still ongoing? Sturgeon is talking bollocks.
    That's the point. If negotiations are still ongoing, it means the timetable will have to be extended.
    And transistion agreement is possible extending the time to x.
  • Options
    AnneJGPAnneJGP Posts: 2,869

    felix said:

    HYUFD said:

    The most difficult point for Theresa May is that Nicola Sturgeon clearly does have a mandate for what she's asking for. In a week when the Westminster government has had to backtrack from breaking a manifesto commitment, the juxtaposition is at the very least unfortunate.

    Not while the Brexit negotiations are ongoing she doesn't, as every Scottish poll shows
    clear and sustained evidence that independence has become the preferred option of a majority of the Scottish people "
    Where's the 'clear and sustained evidence'?

    "or if there is a significant and material change in the circumstances that prevailed in 2014, such as Scotland being taken out of the EU against our will."
    But she's no longer proposing to "stay in"/rejoin the EU.....
    She's trying to salvage something from the wreckage. There's nothing in that wording which requires her to secure Scotland's re-entry into the EU (unsurprisingly, because it wouldn't be within an independent Scotland's powers to guarantee that).

    She has her mandate, however inconvenient that might be for the Westminster government.
    For some on here it's still all about Brexit..........
    It has to be said it's remarkable the number of Leavers who are struggling with the plain English of the SNP's manifesto statement on the subject of a second independence referendum. Democratic principles go out of the window if might make Brexit more complicated.
    I'm a Leaver. I wish the SNP would declare UDI and get it over with. Let the Scots fight it out amongst themselves after that. It is, as we are told so many times, nothing to do with us.
This discussion has been closed.