Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » What would David do?

1235714

Comments

  • Options
    ChameleonChameleon Posts: 3,902

    "Take back control" is getting painfully repetitive.

    If it is bouncing round people's heads for the next 48 hours then it has done it's job.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,970
    DavidL said:

    These lies about Turkey from Leave are contemptible.

    It's great. Few other things demonstrate the lying hypocrisy of the EU better. It is EU and UK policy that they join but no one really means it. It's just a convenient lie for the stupid people. Who can believe anything these scum say about anything?

    Jesus. That's genuinely frightening.
  • Options
    NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,368
    Leadsom grinning as smugly as Osborne on a bad day.
  • Options
    john_zimsjohn_zims Posts: 3,399
    @Casino_Royale


    'Oh, Sadiq. What are you doing.'

    Making a pillock of himself,they should have stuck with Eagle.
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,205
    kle4 said:

    Honestly, immigration is such an open goal for Leave, I'm not sure how Remain are even supposed to get through these sections without damage. Just refuse to say anything for 15 minutes?

    I think the one point they can make is Non EU migration being just as high.
  • Options
    BenedictWhiteBenedictWhite Posts: 1,944

    Jonathan said:

    Just took herself, who was watching the debate, a cup of tea and caught sight of Ruth Davidson doing finger pointing and being very shouty. Total turn-off for me, cannot abide that sort of behaviour. As I left the room Herself was changing channels to watch something else.

    I am sure I have been told that Davidson was a good and engaging politician, a potential Conservative leader at Westminster. Well, you only get one chance to make a first impression and that was her's for me. Shouty, bossy, woman who likes to point fingers and cannot engage in reasonable debate - file under forget.

    British politics as we once knew it died during this campaign. We now have this reheated US tripe.
    I fear you are correct, Mr. Jonathon, though the illness as contracted a good ways back. God only knows what the next GE will be like.
    With regret, it died a long time ago. There is too much saying that your opponent wants to eat babies. (As I see it mostly from the left) rather than saying what you will do.
  • Options
    MortimerMortimer Posts: 13,956
    Barnesian said:

    Mortimer said:

    I'm really standing by the Turkey issue - until and unless the British government stop supporting Turkish entry, it says the British government want Turkey in the EU.

    A country has to adopt and enforce all the current EU rules before it can be admitted to the bloc. EU rules are divided into 35 policy areas and in 10 years Turkey only managed to adopt the rules on one: science and research. In most other areas it has not even made a start.
    Even more argument not to support their entry.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,048
    Pulpstar said:

    SeanT said:

    These lies about Turkey from Leave are contemptible.

    F*ck off, old bean. It is the EU's established policy that Turkey join. Again, it just is.

    It is a lie that Turkish membership is in any way imminent. It just is.

    With respect Southam this is a 40-70 year question at the minimum - so in the long term Turkey is relevant I think. Personally I'm not looking ahead 70 years as I might be dead but long term I think Turkey is joining.
    It's a long term issue, but do you really think people are worried about the things that will happen in 40-70years? If people thought Turkey was a long term issue they wouldn't give two shits - they think it is a short to medium term issue.
  • Options
    ChameleonChameleon Posts: 3,902
    kle4 said:

    Honestly, immigration is such an open goal for Leave, I'm not sure how Remain are even supposed to get through these sections without damage. Just refuse to say anything for 15 minutes?

    That approach may just have done better for them if they had done that.
  • Options
    Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 31,014
    kle4 said:

    Fenster said:

    Why haven't LEAVE used Dan Hannan on the big stage?

    He is a first class communicator.

    He's always seemed decent in the things i've seen him, but he's been pretty invisible. Now, maybe he's putting in the hard yards I'm not seeing, but it's odd.
    From what I have seen and read about Hannan he would find it very difficult to support the leave position on things like Turkey and the £350 million a week. I may be wrong but I have not heard him use either attack line and I suspect by mutual consent he has chosen not to be frontline because he couldn't honestly defend against those lines.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,001
    PM Boris is going to be a disaster, and not just for my next Tory leader betting :p
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,048
    Gods, Grady, she looks so so worried even with the sound off. She could be making great points, but I have to to make the effort, unfair as that is.
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,205
    Gisela is seriously good.
  • Options
    DavidLDavidL Posts: 51,387

    DavidL said:

    These lies about Turkey from Leave are contemptible.

    It's great. Few other things demonstrate the lying hypocrisy of the EU better. It is EU and UK policy that they join but no one really means it. It's just a convenient lie for the stupid people. Who can believe anything these scum say about anything?

    Jesus. That's genuinely frightening.
    Good.
  • Options
    RodCrosbyRodCrosby Posts: 7,737
    Remain hopeless.

    O'Grady & Khan "It's the Tories, innit..."
  • Options
    Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,369
    Stuart losing this with Dimbleby
  • Options
    Barnesian said:

    Mortimer said:

    I'm really standing by the Turkey issue - until and unless the British government stop supporting Turkish entry, it says the British government want Turkey in the EU.

    A country has to adopt and enforce all the current EU rules before it can be admitted to the bloc. EU rules are divided into 35 policy areas and in 10 years Turkey only managed to adopt the rules on one: science and research. In most other areas it has not even made a start.
    Remember that applying to being able to join the Euro and it being fiddled to let Greece join?
  • Options
    numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 5,517
    edited June 2016
    Frances O'Grady is awful. Is every question going to lead to "But the Greedy Bankers!!!"?
  • Options
    DennisBetsDennisBets Posts: 244
    leave looking dodgy on home turf immigration.
  • Options
    BenedictWhiteBenedictWhite Posts: 1,944
    Fenster said:

    DavidL said:

    Mortimer said:

    Andrea is not performing as well this time as in the studio.

    Gisella, meanwhile, is knocking things out of the park.

    Gisella is totally wasted in the Labour Party. They don't appreciate her and she is a gem. I'd love to see her in a Gove government in charge of something like welfare. She has so much to offer.
    In the event of leave I would like to see a Leave cabinet of national unity... or similar.

    It should not be an opportunity for a stitch up.

    Before anyone panics about a certain person, I would only include MPs in that.

    On another note, why does Alistair Meeks seem to think it's nailed on for leave?

    There is only one poll that counts and all we are getting from the opinion polls is noise...
    Get Farage in the House of Lords and make him.Foreign Secretary LOL
    Er... I think I'll pass.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,429
    We already have a points-based system for non-EU immigration and levels are way above both forecast and the government's own targets
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    Take back control now getting groans...
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,001
    kle4 said:

    Pulpstar said:

    SeanT said:

    These lies about Turkey from Leave are contemptible.

    F*ck off, old bean. It is the EU's established policy that Turkey join. Again, it just is.

    It is a lie that Turkish membership is in any way imminent. It just is.

    With respect Southam this is a 40-70 year question at the minimum - so in the long term Turkey is relevant I think. Personally I'm not looking ahead 70 years as I might be dead but long term I think Turkey is joining.
    It's a long term issue, but do you really think people are worried about the things that will happen in 40-70years? If people thought Turkey was a long term issue they wouldn't give two shits - they think it is a short to medium term issue.
    This is a vote for the long term though, you need to think about your children ! (Or niblings)
  • Options
    NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,368
    O'Grady scoring a real hit there "have you promised a reduction in numbers?" - Gisela wriggling furiously.
  • Options
    Danny565Danny565 Posts: 8,091
    edited June 2016
    kle4 said:

    Honestly, immigration is such an open goal for Leave, I'm not sure how Remain are even supposed to get through these sections without damage. Just refuse to say anything for 15 minutes?

    I think their best tactic would be to say that the Leave side truthfully don't really want to bring down immigration -- remind Boris of when he said he's the most pro-immigration politician in Britain, and Gove saying that even Theresa May was too tough on immigration.

    If Remain could fight for a draw on immigration (by saying "immigration won't change regardless of how we vote"), then they could say that people may as well make their decision on other issues. But tractor stats about immigrants "putting more in than they take out" aren't going to work.
  • Options
    Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,369
    Andrea getting laughed at for yet another take back control
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,907
    They need to give the slogan a rest now.
  • Options
    Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 31,014

    Jonathan said:

    Traitor should not be used in this debate to describe anyone.

    Agreed.

    Can we make an exception for the late Edward Heath though?
    TSE was more than happy enough to use it until recently.

    But out of respect for those Remainers I admire on here I have refrained from using the term in the last few weeks.
    #
    I prefer now to reflect how French TSE has become in his attitudes. I think he should be renamed from TSE to LSE.
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,146
    Leave losing the argument on immigration.

    Leadsom needs to be rebooted. She's turned into a robot spouting 'take back control'.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,048
    So far I think it's:

    Stuart
    Davidson
    Boris
    Leadsom
    Khan
    Dimbleby
    Audience
    Grady

    I did love Davidson picking up on the overuse of the 'mum and grandmum stuff'. Pet peeve of mine.

    But in terms of how it will play:

    Leave
    Leave
    Leave
    Leave
    Remain
  • Options
    KentRisingKentRising Posts: 2,850
    tlg86 said:

    kle4 said:

    Honestly, immigration is such an open goal for Leave, I'm not sure how Remain are even supposed to get through these sections without damage. Just refuse to say anything for 15 minutes?

    I think the one point they can make is Non EU migration being just as high.
    Yeah, but Leave's 'Aussie-style points system' would apply to both EU and non-EU, so would presumably reduce both if it is to reduce one.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,292

    Frances O'Grady is awful. Is every question going to lead to "But the Greedy Bankers!!!"?

    Sounds like that harry Enfield sketch of question time!!!
  • Options
    MonikerDiCanioMonikerDiCanio Posts: 5,792

    Leadsom grinning as smugly as Osborne on a bad day.

    She really gets your goat, doesn't she ? She's been a revelation.
  • Options
    john_zimsjohn_zims Posts: 3,399
    @numbertwelve

    'Francis O'Grady is awful. Is every question going to lead to "But the Greedy Bankers!!!"?'


    She thinks she's fighting the 2015 election.
  • Options
    MortimerMortimer Posts: 13,956
    Caroline Lucas is trying to help Leave, right?
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,048
    Shallow comment of the night permitted? Mishal Husain is very attractive.
  • Options
    DennisBetsDennisBets Posts: 244
    Vote remain and flog Osbourne, I can see the logic...
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,048
    edited June 2016

    Leave losing the argument on immigration.

    Not possible. Leave could not show up and Remain could spin a story worthy of shakespeare, and Immigration would be Leave's issue.

    Just turned the sound off during the break, Humza Yousuf looks really angry - was he?
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,907
    john_zims said:

    @numbertwelve

    'Francis O'Grady is awful. Is every question going to lead to "But the Greedy Bankers!!!"?'


    She thinks she's fighting the 2015 election.

    She's not there to appeal to you I guess. She definitely scored a point in that last bit.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,970
    DavidL said:

    DavidL said:

    These lies about Turkey from Leave are contemptible.

    It's great. Few other things demonstrate the lying hypocrisy of the EU better. It is EU and UK policy that they join but no one really means it. It's just a convenient lie for the stupid people. Who can believe anything these scum say about anything?

    Jesus. That's genuinely frightening.
    Good.

    Great - let's all lie because people are stupid.

  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,627

    Leave losing the argument on immigration.

    Leadsom needs to be rebooted. She's turned into a robot spouting 'take back control'.

    She's not performing as well as I thought she would today.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,429

    tlg86 said:

    kle4 said:

    Honestly, immigration is such an open goal for Leave, I'm not sure how Remain are even supposed to get through these sections without damage. Just refuse to say anything for 15 minutes?

    I think the one point they can make is Non EU migration being just as high.
    Yeah, but Leave's 'Aussie-style points system' would apply to both EU and non-EU, so would presumably reduce both if it is to reduce one.
    We already have it for non-EU
  • Options
    BenedictWhiteBenedictWhite Posts: 1,944

    DavidL said:

    Mortimer said:

    Andrea is not performing as well this time as in the studio.

    Gisella, meanwhile, is knocking things out of the park.

    Gisella is totally wasted in the Labour Party. They don't appreciate her and she is a gem. I'd love to see her in a Gove government in charge of something like welfare. She has so much to offer.
    In the event of leave I would like to see a Leave cabinet of national unity... or similar.

    It should not be an opportunity for a stitch up.

    Before anyone panics about a certain person, I would only include MPs in that.

    On another note, why does Alistair Meeks seem to think it's nailed on for leave?

    There is only one poll that counts and all we are getting from the opinion polls is noise...
    I agree with Alistair after doing the maths - see previous thread for details.
    Ermm... I am not going to pick through 850 posts... But as far as I can tell it's close. The PM is bricking it as are Brussels (good, politicians should) but it isn't over. (Certainly not on Betfair you can 4.1 for the UK and 3 in England at the moment, so pile in if you want some)
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,920
    edited June 2016
    Gisela came unstuck on the "promise" to reduce immigration... Not sure why because all she had to do was say LEAVE is not standing on a manifesto and it will be for future governments, after we've left, to decide what level we need on a year by year and parliament and parliament basis.

    The point of taking back control is that you have control to set the level to whatever is deemed appropriate at the time.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,990

    Andrea getting laughed at for yet another take back control

    Remind you of long term economic plan? The relentless use of it made it stick.
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,205
    This is the crux for me. If Remain were promising to pretty much abolish the welfare state and the NHS I would consider voting to stay.
  • Options
    tysontyson Posts: 6,050
    SeanT said:

    Leadsom grinning as smugly as Osborne on a bad day.

    F*cks like you are the reason we are here. If you had allowed a vote on the EU Constitution we would have stalled EU integration, and we wouldn't be faced with this hideous binary decision.

    Do you now realise this?
    Charming

  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,627
    Diane James came bloody close to crossing the line there.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    I may not be an unbiased observer, but I think Leave are losing the immigration debate...
  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383
    Mortimer said:

    Caroline Lucas is trying to help Leave, right?

    She's good when she's not all shouty. When shouty, she's awful. What was that about building leisure centres?
  • Options
    maaarshmaaarsh Posts: 3,391

    DavidL said:

    DavidL said:

    These lies about Turkey from Leave are contemptible.

    It's great. Few other things demonstrate the lying hypocrisy of the EU better. It is EU and UK policy that they join but no one really means it. It's just a convenient lie for the stupid people. Who can believe anything these scum say about anything?

    Jesus. That's genuinely frightening.
    Good.

    Great - let's all lie because people are stupid.

    You clearly misunderstood his point.

    Best to stick to your 'I told you so routine' about the brexit recession which hasn't happened yet.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,001
    "hang her head in shame"

    House !
  • Options
    MortimerMortimer Posts: 13,956
    Tony Parsons has just connected with every person who wants to vote Leave but isn't quite sure.

    Good man.
  • Options
    Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 25,551

    DavidL said:

    DavidL said:

    These lies about Turkey from Leave are contemptible.

    It's great. Few other things demonstrate the lying hypocrisy of the EU better. It is EU and UK policy that they join but no one really means it. It's just a convenient lie for the stupid people. Who can believe anything these scum say about anything?

    Jesus. That's genuinely frightening.
    Good.

    Great - let's all lie because people are stupid.

    You've been in another Remain strategy meeting haven't you?
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,941

    kle4 said:

    Fenster said:

    Why haven't LEAVE used Dan Hannan on the big stage?

    He is a first class communicator.

    He's always seemed decent in the things i've seen him, but he's been pretty invisible. Now, maybe he's putting in the hard yards I'm not seeing, but it's odd.
    From what I have seen and read about Hannan he would find it very difficult to support the leave position on things like Turkey and the £350 million a week. I may be wrong but I have not heard him use either attack line and I suspect by mutual consent he has chosen not to be frontline because he couldn't honestly defend against those lines.
    He's not really an attack line chap, is he? I've only ever heard a positive vision of the UK outside the EU from him, any negativity being directed at the EU itself - its corrupt systems, unaccountable executive and expensive bureaucracy. Shame we've not seen more of him though, we need more positivity in politics. Hopefully we will make him redundant as an MEP and can get him on the green benches in the near future.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,970
    A few Leavers getting very aggressive. I hope they are calmer once they've won.
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,146
    kle4 said:

    Leave losing the argument on immigration.

    Not possible.
    They had no answer to O'Grady's question on numbers.

    Then after Davidson said that we need a much more intelligent debate on immigration, Leadsom countered with, "That is nonsense." Awful from the Leave team.
  • Options
    ChameleonChameleon Posts: 3,902

    DavidL said:

    DavidL said:

    These lies about Turkey from Leave are contemptible.

    It's great. Few other things demonstrate the lying hypocrisy of the EU better. It is EU and UK policy that they join but no one really means it. It's just a convenient lie for the stupid people. Who can believe anything these scum say about anything?

    Jesus. That's genuinely frightening.
    Good.

    Great - let's all lie because people are stupid.

    You've been in another Remain strategy meeting haven't you?
    Titter
  • Options
    NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,368
    First Ruth, then the SNP guy - Scottish politicians significantly more aggressive than the English!
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @JeremyCliffe: I don't find Andrea Leadsom convincing. But I can see her going down well among Tory grassroots. #BBCDebate

    @PCollinsTimes: Some politicians have a brief spell of being over-rated. That's what this is. https://t.co/X0Gu3OL0v2
  • Options
    JonCisBackJonCisBack Posts: 911
    tyson said:

    This is the first program of any kind I have watched on this dreadful referendum. I'm going to give an objective view, if that is possible.

    Gisela Stuart- never heard of her- is the star of the show. Dimbleby is doing OK. Khan isn't too bad, And Boris has his usual appeal. The trade union women appears to be a bad pick. I like Ruth Davisdon a lot....so it is difficult for me to be objective, but she appears fine.

    Amazed you have not heard of Gisela Stuart - really surprised, She is an ex-German (don;t know the details!) and has some experience of working in or for the EU which has turned her to leave.

    Commands huge respect, and also for holding Birmingham Edgbaston repeatedly on small majorities but with no swing against her even in 2010
  • Options
    numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 5,517
    Sarah Wollaston seems to have had a damascene conversion on EVERY issue.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,001
    "Another Wolverhampton every year".

    That's a horrifying prospect to be honest.
  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383
    Mortimer said:

    Tony Parsons has just connected with every person who wants to vote Leave but isn't quite sure.

    Good man.

    He's excellent - decades as a WWC writer for the Mirror, he gets it.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @KateEMcCann: Perfect example of @RuthDavidsonMSP's ability to pick up on the mood, she made the Mum/Gran joke Twitter has picked up while still on stage
  • Options
    DavidLDavidL Posts: 51,387
    The truth is we have 4m here now from the subcontinent who we have not tried nearly hard enough to integrate because of deeply demented multicultural policies and that is going to generate significant immigration leave or remain until they want a Brit as a bride or husband. Not much we can do about that except encourage integration at every opportunity.

    But the unemployed of Europe is something we can do something about no matter how hard they want to work here.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,048
    Mortimer said:

    Barnesian said:

    Mortimer said:

    I'm really standing by the Turkey issue - until and unless the British government stop supporting Turkish entry, it says the British government want Turkey in the EU.

    A country has to adopt and enforce all the current EU rules before it can be admitted to the bloc. EU rules are divided into 35 policy areas and in 10 years Turkey only managed to adopt the rules on one: science and research. In most other areas it has not even made a start.
    Even more argument not to support their entry.
    Supporting entry once they meet those areas is not exactly rolling out the welcome mat. Granted, they get some leeway because they have us over a barrel, but that's another matter.
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,205

    Sarah Wollaston seems to have had a damascene conversion on EVERY issue.

    She learnt her lines very well.
  • Options
    welshowlwelshowl Posts: 4,460

    Jonathan said:

    Traitor should not be used in this debate to describe anyone.

    Agreed.

    Can we make an exception for the late Edward Heath though?
    TSE was more than happy enough to use it until recently.

    But out of respect for those Remainers I admire on here I have refrained from using the term in the last few weeks.
    #
    I prefer now to reflect how French TSE has become in his attitudes. I think he should be renamed from TSE to LSE.
    Les aigles hurlants peut-etre?
  • Options
    tysontyson Posts: 6,050

    tyson said:

    This is the first program of any kind I have watched on this dreadful referendum. I'm going to give an objective view, if that is possible.

    Gisela Stuart- never heard of her- is the star of the show. Dimbleby is doing OK. Khan isn't too bad, And Boris has his usual appeal. The trade union women appears to be a bad pick. I like Ruth Davisdon a lot....so it is difficult for me to be objective, but she appears fine.

    Amazed you have not heard of Gisela Stuart - really surprised, She is an ex-German (don;t know the details!) and has some experience of working in or for the EU which has turned her to leave.

    Commands huge respect, and also for holding Birmingham Edgbaston repeatedly on small majorities but with no swing against her even in 2010

    It doesn't surprise me that Gisela is German.
    After watching the footie this afternoon, I am under no illusion that they are the master race.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,001

    Sarah Wollaston seems to have had a damascene conversion on EVERY issue.

    Obviously a complete careerist. I don't think she does Remain any favours, people see right through that crap.
  • Options
    BenedictWhiteBenedictWhite Posts: 1,944

    DavidL said:

    These lies about Turkey from Leave are contemptible.

    It's great. Few other things demonstrate the lying hypocrisy of the EU better. It is EU and UK policy that they join but no one really means it. It's just a convenient lie for the stupid people. Who can believe anything these scum say about anything?

    Jesus. That's genuinely frightening.
    It is. It is however a reflection of the fact that most people view most politicians as duplicitous B'Stards. It is how it is. It would help if they tried to sound a little less PR and a little more honest. They don't because the other duplicitous B'Stards shout foul and gaffe when they do.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,048

    First Ruth, then the SNP guy - Scottish politicians significantly more aggressive than the English!

    Referendum practice
  • Options
    AnneJGPAnneJGP Posts: 2,869
    SeanT said:

    Zingers from Farron and Wollaston - better than the main Remain speakers so far.

    Wollaston is a traitor.
    Nothing wrong with changing your mind.
  • Options
    ChameleonChameleon Posts: 3,902
    Got to go big on the European Army.
  • Options
    SeanT said:

    tyson said:

    SeanT said:

    Leadsom grinning as smugly as Osborne on a bad day.

    F*cks like you are the reason we are here. If you had allowed a vote on the EU Constitution we would have stalled EU integration, and we wouldn't be faced with this hideous binary decision.

    Do you now realise this?
    Charming

    But I'm entirely right. And you know it. And so does Nick.
    Sean. You are better than that.
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,205
    AnneJGP said:

    SeanT said:

    Zingers from Farron and Wollaston - better than the main Remain speakers so far.

    Wollaston is a traitor.
    Nothing wrong with changing your mind.
    Very true. I just don't think she has changed her mind.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @Peston: No hack here in spinroom can stand up UKIP's Diane James claim @Nigel_Farage apologised for THAT poster. He defended it on @pestononsunday
  • Options
    tyson said:

    tyson said:

    This is the first program of any kind I have watched on this dreadful referendum. I'm going to give an objective view, if that is possible.

    Gisela Stuart- never heard of her- is the star of the show. Dimbleby is doing OK. Khan isn't too bad, And Boris has his usual appeal. The trade union women appears to be a bad pick. I like Ruth Davisdon a lot....so it is difficult for me to be objective, but she appears fine.

    Amazed you have not heard of Gisela Stuart - really surprised, She is an ex-German (don;t know the details!) and has some experience of working in or for the EU which has turned her to leave.

    Commands huge respect, and also for holding Birmingham Edgbaston repeatedly on small majorities but with no swing against her even in 2010

    It doesn't surprise me that Gisela is German.
    After watching the footie this afternoon, I am under no illusion that they are the master race.
    What rubbish. They cant even play cricket to county standard.
  • Options
    Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    Pulpstar said:

    "Another Wolverhampton every year".

    That's a horrifying prospect to be honest.

    Yes indeed, that will double my journey time from Stafford to London inside a decade, since it takes the train about 10 minutes to get to Wolverhampton.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,048
    Pulpstar said:

    Sarah Wollaston seems to have had a damascene conversion on EVERY issue.

    Obviously a complete careerist. I don't think she does Remain any favours, people see right through that crap.
    Wollaston is a careerist!?

    Well, if so she's picked the right moment. Except not, since a Leave leader is incoming this year or next.
  • Options
    Danny565Danny565 Posts: 8,091
    Scott_P said:

    @Peston: No hack here in spinroom can stand up UKIP's Diane James claim @Nigel_Farage apologised for THAT poster. He defended it on @pestononsunday

    Oh, is that what she said? I thought she was saying Humza Yousaf should apologise.
  • Options
    BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 8,006
    Mortimer said:

    Barnesian said:

    Mortimer said:

    I'm really standing by the Turkey issue - until and unless the British government stop supporting Turkish entry, it says the British government want Turkey in the EU.

    A country has to adopt and enforce all the current EU rules before it can be admitted to the bloc. EU rules are divided into 35 policy areas and in 10 years Turkey only managed to adopt the rules on one: science and research. In most other areas it has not even made a start.
    Even more argument not to support their entry.
    Quite. Turkey is moving away from EU conditions not towards them. There is no question Turkey joining the EU in our lifetime. It is a non-issue but promoted by the Leave side as a frightener.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,001
    DavidL said:

    The truth is we have 4m here now from the subcontinent who we have not tried nearly hard enough to integrate because of deeply demented multicultural policies and that is going to generate significant immigration leave or remain until they want a Brit as a bride or husband. Not much we can do about that except encourage integration at every opportunity.

    But the unemployed of Europe is something we can do something about no matter how hard they want to work here.

    @MarkSenior has made some very interesting points on non EU migration - the amount coming in compared to employment created was a staggering mismatch. And we should switch to a completely contributory benefits system if we vote to remain, as EU citizens will be fungible with British citizens.
  • Options
    NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,368
    SeanT said:

    Leadsom grinning as smugly as Osborne on a bad day.

    F*cks like you are the reason we are here. If you had allowed a vote on the EU Constitution we would have stalled EU integration, and we wouldn't be faced with this hideous binary decision.

    Do you now realise this?
    You actually like this referendum and wish we'd had it sooner? There speaks a torture porn author.
  • Options
    MortimerMortimer Posts: 13,956
    Wow, can't believe what Tyson just wrote. If someone from Leave had there would have been accusations from here to Thursday.

  • Options
    Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 31,014
    welshowl said:

    Jonathan said:

    Traitor should not be used in this debate to describe anyone.

    Agreed.

    Can we make an exception for the late Edward Heath though?
    TSE was more than happy enough to use it until recently.

    But out of respect for those Remainers I admire on here I have refrained from using the term in the last few weeks.
    #
    I prefer now to reflect how French TSE has become in his attitudes. I think he should be renamed from TSE to LSE.
    Les aigles hurlants peut-etre?
    Ta me old mucker. I speak French but had a momentary brainstorm and couldn't for the life of me think of the word for Eagle.
  • Options
    MortimerMortimer Posts: 13,956
    Laughing at Ruth's 'we make the EU work for us'
  • Options
    DavidLDavidL Posts: 51,387

    DavidL said:

    DavidL said:

    These lies about Turkey from Leave are contemptible.

    It's great. Few other things demonstrate the lying hypocrisy of the EU better. It is EU and UK policy that they join but no one really means it. It's just a convenient lie for the stupid people. Who can believe anything these scum say about anything?

    Jesus. That's genuinely frightening.
    Good.

    Great - let's all lie because people are stupid.

    We only need to do that whilst in the EU. It is how they do business. It stinks. Stop it. Vote leave.
  • Options
    DennisBetsDennisBets Posts: 244
    tlg86 said:

    This is the crux for me. If Remain were promising to pretty much abolish the welfare state and the NHS I would consider voting to stay.

    Donald Trump?
  • Options
    welshowlwelshowl Posts: 4,460

    tyson said:

    tyson said:

    This is the first program of any kind I have watched on this dreadful referendum. I'm going to give an objective view, if that is possible.

    Gisela Stuart- never heard of her- is the star of the show. Dimbleby is doing OK. Khan isn't too bad, And Boris has his usual appeal. The trade union women appears to be a bad pick. I like Ruth Davisdon a lot....so it is difficult for me to be objective, but she appears fine.

    Amazed you have not heard of Gisela Stuart - really surprised, She is an ex-German (don;t know the details!) and has some experience of working in or for the EU which has turned her to leave.

    Commands huge respect, and also for holding Birmingham Edgbaston repeatedly on small majorities but with no swing against her even in 2010

    It doesn't surprise me that Gisela is German.
    After watching the footie this afternoon, I am under no illusion that they are the master race.
    What rubbish. They cant even play cricket to county standard.
    Except Shane Warne whose mum is German!
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,048
    Davidson: We make the EU work for us

    Hahahaha. Another cracking gag from her.

    Honestly, it would be great for Remain if they could have tried that and made it stick. But even most Remainers won't believe it.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @NickyMorgan01: It's clear Vote Leave don't have a plan for the economy - and now it's getting clearer they don't have a plan for immigration #BBCDebate
  • Options
    GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,094
    Who would decide when to send the EU army to war?
  • Options
    MortimerMortimer Posts: 13,956
    Wow, didn't know that about eu gravy train pay...
  • Options
    john_zimsjohn_zims Posts: 3,399
    @Pulpstar

    numbertwelve

    Sarah Wollaston seems to have had a damascene conversion on EVERY issue.

    Obviously a complete careerist. I don't think she does Remain any favours, people see right through that crap.'


    The only thing Woolsaton cares about is herself.
  • Options
    NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,368
    Think the Leave side has now overused the Take back control meme - they're using it robotically in almost very round and the audience is starting to giggle.
  • Options
    KentRisingKentRising Posts: 2,850
    Barnesian said:

    Mortimer said:

    Barnesian said:

    Mortimer said:

    I'm really standing by the Turkey issue - until and unless the British government stop supporting Turkish entry, it says the British government want Turkey in the EU.

    A country has to adopt and enforce all the current EU rules before it can be admitted to the bloc. EU rules are divided into 35 policy areas and in 10 years Turkey only managed to adopt the rules on one: science and research. In most other areas it has not even made a start.
    Even more argument not to support their entry.
    Quite. Turkey is moving away from EU conditions not towards them. There is no question Turkey joining the EU in our lifetime. It is a non-issue but promoted by the Leave side as a frightener.
    I don't trust the EU to abide by any of its own guidelines . It could just as easily turn around next year and redefine the guidelines in a way that makes Turkey admissable.

    People don't trust the EU. Simple as that.


  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,205

    tlg86 said:

    This is the crux for me. If Remain were promising to pretty much abolish the welfare state and the NHS I would consider voting to stay.

    Donald Trump?
    Is that what he is promising? I didn't realise they had anything to abolish!
  • Options
    MortimerMortimer Posts: 13,956
    Barnesian said:

    Mortimer said:

    Barnesian said:

    Mortimer said:

    I'm really standing by the Turkey issue - until and unless the British government stop supporting Turkish entry, it says the British government want Turkey in the EU.

    A country has to adopt and enforce all the current EU rules before it can be admitted to the bloc. EU rules are divided into 35 policy areas and in 10 years Turkey only managed to adopt the rules on one: science and research. In most other areas it has not even made a start.
    Even more argument not to support their entry.
    Quite. Turkey is moving away from EU conditions not towards them. There is no question Turkey joining the EU in our lifetime. It is a non-issue but promoted by the Leave side as a frightener.
    Then why oh why won't DC come out against it?
This discussion has been closed.