politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The EURef might be more like the AV referendum and not the Indyref
A lot of people, myself included, have often drawn comparisons between the EU referendum and the Scottish independence referendum, but perhaps the better comparison is with the AV referendum of 2011.
The AV referendum was more a 1975 EEC referendum margin of victory, ie a landslide, the latest EU ref poll from NBC has it exactly tied ie even closer than Scotland. Ironically Farage backed Yes in AV ref and Cameron No
You know what, it's been a shitty week. Sorry if I've upset people, been rude to them or been unpleasant. I know I have been. It's not how I really am, honestly :-)
It's time to take a chill pill. And to think before posting stuff. I wish red wine did not give me hangovers. I'd have a few glasses now.
I'll try to be better.
Pax.
While I'm all for being reflective, not that you seem to have been notably unpleasant, I beseech you not to make the mistake of thinking about things before you post them - that way madness lies!
If Leave do win and then effectively take over the party then the Tories lose the centre ground and power. If remain win many 'Leavers won't accept the result and the tories could split and will lose power. Who knows what will happen but I'm not convinced the Tories will win in 2020 [or before] and given the current alternatives that is pretty piss poor for the country.
If Leave do win and then effectively take over the party then the Tories lose the centre ground and power. If remain win many 'Leavers won't accept the result and the tories could split and will lose power. Who knows what will happen but I'm not convinced the Tories will win in 2020 [or before] and given the current alternatives that is pretty piss poor for the country.
If it is Leave and Kipper Tory v Corbyn/Mcdonnell that would be a return to politics circa 1980-1983, neither would command the centre ground which would perhaps give a boost to the LDs who would have to ditch their pro EU stance in a post EU UK. If it is a close Remain then Hammond or May most likely succeed Cameron and should lead the largest party in 2020, though with significant seat losses thanks to a resurgent UKIP
If Leave do win and then effectively take over the party then the Tories lose the centre ground and power. If remain win many 'Leavers won't accept the result and the tories could split and will lose power. Who knows what will happen but I'm not convinced the Tories will win in 2020 [or before] and given the current alternatives that is pretty piss poor for the country.
It depends what you mean by the centre ground. All the likely candidates for succession from the Leave side seem to be fairly centrist socially ( with the exception of Patel and her views on capital punishment). Fiscally they are dry and they would carry with them the overwhelming majority of the Parliamentary party as there are very few real headbanger Europhiles on the back benches.
A Leave result would also remove a large portion of the UKIP support.
I can easily see a Tory party winning in 2020 off the back of a Leave victory.
'If Leave do win and then effectively take over the party then the Tories lose the centre ground and power. If remain win many 'Leavers won't accept the result and the tories could split and will lose power.'
Can't see a problem for the Tories in the event that Leave loses provided that Cameron is replaced by a Leave leader.
On topic, I don't think the EuroRef is much like the AVRef at its core, even if certain aspects have manifested the same way. Although even many Yessers in the AV were arguing on the basis it wasn't perfect but better than the alternative, it was still a battle against apathy more than dislike. While people did not rate the EU specifically as a prime concern, in general, there was a serious strain of dislike for it, whereas neither option stirred as much emotion regarding AV.
If Leave do win and then effectively take over the party then the Tories lose the centre ground and power. If remain win many 'Leavers won't accept the result and the tories could split and will lose power. Who knows what will happen but I'm not convinced the Tories will win in 2020 [or before] and given the current alternatives that is pretty piss poor for the country.
@felix Can't see a problem for the Tories in the event that Leave loses provided that Cameron is replaced by a Leave leader.
That seems wildly optimistic to me, in the vein of those who thought the Tories would remain civil during this campaign. The wrong type of leaver could cause significant problems, as some will be seeing this as the chance to ditch the Cameroon project, and others will want to maintain it in every way but for the Leaving part.
If Leave do win and then effectively take over the party then the Tories lose the centre ground and power. If remain win many 'Leavers won't accept the result and the tories could split and will lose power. Who knows what will happen but I'm not convinced the Tories will win in 2020 [or before] and given the current alternatives that is pretty piss poor for the country.
If it is Leave and Kipper Tory v Corbyn/Mcdonnell that would be a return to politics circa 1980-1983, neither would command the centre ground which would perhaps give a boost to the LDs who would have to ditch their pro EU stance in a post EU UK. If it is a close Remain then Hammond or May most likely succeed Cameron and should lead the largest party in 2020, though with significant seat losses thanks to a resurgent UKIP
'That seems wildly optimistic to me, in the vein of those who thought the Tories would remain civil during this campaign. The wrong type of leaver could cause significant problems, as some will be seeing this as the chance to ditch the Cameroon project, and others will want to maintain it in every way but for the Leaving part.'
During the past 12 months am not exactly sure what the Cameroon project is,other than bringing forward proposals and at the first sign of trouble ditching them.
A Leave leader would be a reminder to Junker & co that if they want to ram an EU army et al down our throats then we can play the EU game & have another referendum.
Stroke of genius by Remain to suspend campaigning for several days. The news stations and print media will be giving interview after interview to politicians who can make all sorts of claims. Meanwhile Leave are unable to start up the campaign for fear of being branded insensitive.
South Belfast was also contested after the murder of Robert Bradford and Abingdon after Airey Neave's death (although the latter was killed just before the 1979 election so no by-election was held).
I'm not sure the best response to an "attack on democracy" is effectively to suspend it. Of course Labour would easily retain the seat but there ought to be a contest so the new MP has a mandate rather than simply be gifted the seat.
Stroke of genius by Remain to suspend campaigning for several days. The news stations and print media will be giving interview after interview to politicians who can make all sorts of claims. Meanwhile Leave are unable to start up the campaign for fear of being branded insensitive.
Aren't most of the print media in favour of leaving?
If Leave do win and then effectively take over the party then the Tories lose the centre ground and power. If remain win many 'Leavers won't accept the result and the tories could split and will lose power. Who knows what will happen but I'm not convinced the Tories will win in 2020 [or before] and given the current alternatives that is pretty piss poor for the country.
If it is Leave and Kipper Tory v Corbyn/Mcdonnell that would be a return to politics circa 1980-1983, neither would command the centre ground which would perhaps give a boost to the LDs who would have to ditch their pro EU stance in a post EU UK. If it is a close Remain then Hammond or May most likely succeed Cameron and should lead the largest party in 2020, though with significant seat losses thanks to a resurgent UKIP
What resurgent UKIP ? There is a bye election next month in a Cornwall CC UKIP held seat , they have already lost it as they are not even standing a candidate . They are withering away .
There's an Old Holborn tweet that purports to show the killer standing behind a Britain First banner. Does look like him. Must say, I don't remember feeling so angry about what someone's done. I'm also glad Leave has people as articulate as Hannan, Gove etc and look forward to them being able to speak soon.
Question on the linking of aspects of the Leave campaign (particularly Farage's poster and comments about "violence is the next step") and the death of Jo Cox.
Presumably if it had not happened then few would disagree that it would be legitimate to publicly criticise the tone of the campaign and make inferences that such campaigning has the potential to stoke tensions and lead to unfortunate consequences.
Why then when the fears of what could occur actually crystallize into dreadful reality does such criticism suddenly cease to be legitimate?
I can easily see a Tory party winning in 2020 off the back of a Leave victory.
Unless, of course, the Remainers are correct in their prediction that Brexit fecks the UK economy. In which case things that politics used to be about such as inflation, unemployment and interest rates make a comeback, Leave get the blame and we get PM Corbyn.
'Stroke of genius by Remain to suspend campaigning for several days. The news stations and print media will be giving interview after interview to politicians who can make all sorts of claims. Meanwhile Leave are unable to start up the campaign for fear of being branded insensitive.'
On the other hand it keeps Carney, Osborne & project fear off the media and anyway half the country is switched off enjoying the football.
During the past 12 months am not exactly sure what the Cameroon project is,other than bringing forward proposals and at the first sign of trouble ditching them.
A Leave leader would be a reminder to Junker & co that if they want to ram an EU army et al down our throats then we can play the EU game & have another referendum.
Those two statements look entirely unconnected to me. One of the problems of the last 12 months was the Tories have a very small majority and a small group of dissenters could cause big trouble, not helped by Cameron and Osborne having a pretty crap year, tactically.
But that problem doesn't go away with a Leave leader. There may be some confusion over exactly what the Cameroon project is or was, but there were people implacably opposed to it nevertheless, and if a Leave leader doesn't play ball with people of the same ilk and do exactly what they want, then the government will be just as weak as it was before.
I genuinely hope whoever takes over proves competent, but it is a real worry that, given I do accept there will negative consequences to Leaving, we might well have an even crapper government.
There's an Old Holborn tweet that purports to show the killer standing behind a Britain First banner. Does look like him. Must say, I don't remember feeling so angry about what someone's done. I'm also glad Leave has people as articulate as Hannan, Gove etc and look forward to them being able to speak soon.
At the start of the referendum campaign, there was a large argument over which of the two shadow organisations should take on the mantle of the "official" leave campaign. The feeling was that the UKIP inspired campaign would concentrate too much on immigration and appeal to the base instincts of the electorate in a way that would be unfortunate for the debate and potentially bad for the Leave cause. And yet as the referendum reached its later stages all these early thoughts were out of the window as the official campaign decided that the route to victory was to effectively co-opt the campaign that they had earlier been so keen to disassociate with. They've made their bed they now have to lie in it.
If Leave do win and then effectively take over the party then the Tories lose the centre ground and power. If remain win many 'Leavers won't accept the result and the tories could split and will lose power. Who knows what will happen but I'm not convinced the Tories will win in 2020 [or before] and given the current alternatives that is pretty piss poor for the country.
If it is Leave and Kipper Tory v Corbyn/Mcdonnell that would be a return to politics circa 1980-1983, neither would command the centre ground which would perhaps give a boost to the LDs who would have to ditch their pro EU stance in a post EU UK. If it is a close Remain then Hammond or May most likely succeed Cameron and should lead the largest party in 2020, though with significant seat losses thanks to a resurgent UKIP
I actually think the biggest beneficiaries of a Leave vote would be the libdems.
I can easily see a Tory party winning in 2020 off the back of a Leave victory.
Unless, of course, the Remainers are correct in their prediction that Brexit fecks the UK economy. In which case things that politics used to be about such as inflation, unemployment and interest rates make a comeback, Leave get the blame and we get PM Corbyn.
No, if the actual remain forecasts are 100% correct there will actually be little pain. If the over exaggeration economic collapse are correct then you may be right.
If Leave do win and then effectively take over the party then the Tories lose the centre ground and power. If remain win many 'Leavers won't accept the result and the tories could split and will lose power. Who knows what will happen but I'm not convinced the Tories will win in 2020 [or before] and given the current alternatives that is pretty piss poor for the country.
If it is Leave and Kipper Tory v Corbyn/Mcdonnell that would be a return to politics circa 1980-1983, neither would command the centre ground which would perhaps give a boost to the LDs who would have to ditch their pro EU stance in a post EU UK. If it is a close Remain then Hammond or May most likely succeed Cameron and should lead the largest party in 2020, though with significant seat losses thanks to a resurgent UKIP
I actually think the biggest beneficiaries of a Leave vote would be the libdems.
It seems like the situation would be tailor made for a LD recovery, but the fact they are still invisible or even going backwards makes me think even with the most beneficial environment they will not manage it.
If Leave do win and then effectively take over the party then the Tories lose the centre ground and power. If remain win many 'Leavers won't accept the result and the tories could split and will lose power. Who knows what will happen but I'm not convinced the Tories will win in 2020 [or before] and given the current alternatives that is pretty piss poor for the country.
If it is Leave and Kipper Tory v Corbyn/Mcdonnell that would be a return to politics circa 1980-1983, neither would command the centre ground which would perhaps give a boost to the LDs who would have to ditch their pro EU stance in a post EU UK. If it is a close Remain then Hammond or May most likely succeed Cameron and should lead the largest party in 2020, though with significant seat losses thanks to a resurgent UKIP
I actually think the biggest beneficiaries of a Leave vote would be the libdems.
Good evening all. Can report that the Northern branch of my family have voted 9:1 Exit:Remain. Have agreed to promote single errant nephew to new status of 'Family Black Sheep'. Wills changed accordingly .
If Leave do win and then effectively take over the party then the Tories lose the centre ground and power. If remain win many 'Leavers won't accept the result and the tories could split and will lose power. Who knows what will happen but I'm not convinced the Tories will win in 2020 [or before] and given the current alternatives that is pretty piss poor for the country.
If it is Leave and Kipper Tory v Corbyn/Mcdonnell that would be a return to politics circa 1980-1983, neither would command the centre ground which would perhaps give a boost to the LDs who would have to ditch their pro EU stance in a post EU UK. If it is a close Remain then Hammond or May most likely succeed Cameron and should lead the largest party in 2020, though with significant seat losses thanks to a resurgent UKIP
I actually think the biggest beneficiaries of a Leave vote would be the libdems.
It seems like the situation would be tailor made for a LD recovery, but the fact they are still invisible or even going backwards makes me think even with the most beneficial environment they will not manage it.
'That seems wildly optimistic to me, in the vein of those who thought the Tories would remain civil during this campaign. The wrong type of leaver could cause significant problems, as some will be seeing this as the chance to ditch the Cameroon project, and others will want to maintain it in every way but for the Leaving part.'
During the past 12 months am not exactly sure what the Cameroon project is,other than bringing forward proposals and at the first sign of trouble ditching them.
A Leave leader would be a reminder to Junker & co that if they want to ram an EU army et al down our throats then we can play the EU game & have another referendum.
If we Remain in I don't want a Leave leader. There is a huge amount of shit coming our way as a country from the EU and I want a Remainder to be right there to take the full brunt of it as they deserve. After they are driven from office in 2020 we can think about getting someone worthy of leading a party again.
I can easily see a Tory party winning in 2020 off the back of a Leave victory.
Unless, of course, the Remainers are correct in their prediction that Brexit fecks the UK economy. In which case things that politics used to be about such as inflation, unemployment and interest rates make a comeback, Leave get the blame and we get PM Corbyn.
Which they aren't. The economic doom is being turned up to 11 because that's all Remain have.
I can easily see a Tory party winning in 2020 off the back of a Leave victory.
Unless, of course, the Remainers are correct in their prediction that Brexit fecks the UK economy. In which case things that politics used to be about such as inflation, unemployment and interest rates make a comeback, Leave get the blame and we get PM Corbyn.
It's quite ironic that commentators say that the economic arguments for Remain are not gaining traction and that people are more worried about immigration. If Leave wins immigration will not fall quickly because new legislation and systems will be needed but if the economy tanks Leave will get the blame but more likely the Tory government will get the blame and yes we might get Corbyn as PM. Be careful what you vote for!
I can easily see a Tory party winning in 2020 off the back of a Leave victory.
Unless, of course, the Remainers are correct in their prediction that Brexit fecks the UK economy. In which case things that politics used to be about such as inflation, unemployment and interest rates make a comeback, Leave get the blame and we get PM Corbyn.
Which they aren't. The economic doom is being turned up to 11 because that's all Remain have.
B*llocks. It's been turned up to 15 and the knobs broken off!
'That seems wildly optimistic to me, in the vein of those who thought the Tories would remain civil during this campaign. The wrong type of leaver could cause significant problems, as some will be seeing this as the chance to ditch the Cameroon project, and others will want to maintain it in every way but for the Leaving part.'
During the past 12 months am not exactly sure what the Cameroon project is,other than bringing forward proposals and at the first sign of trouble ditching them.
A Leave leader would be a reminder to Junker & co that if they want to ram an EU army et al down our throats then we can play the EU game & have another referendum.
If we Remain in I don't want a Leave leader. There is a huge amount of shit coming our way as a country from the EU and I want a Remainder to be right there to take the full brunt of it as they deserve. After they are driven from office in 2020 we can think about getting someone worthy of leading a party again.
I find it quite amusing that Remainers repeatedly say that they would like to put the EU referendum behind them and move on. No, they need to be held fully accountable for their decision.
If Leave do win and then effectively take over the party then the Tories lose the centre ground and power. If remain win many 'Leavers won't accept the result and the tories could split and will lose power. Who knows what will happen but I'm not convinced the Tories will win in 2020 [or before] and given the current alternatives that is pretty piss poor for the country.
If it is Leave and Kipper Tory v Corbyn/Mcdonnell that would be a return to politics circa 1980-1983, neither would command the centre ground which would perhaps give a boost to the LDs who would have to ditch their pro EU stance in a post EU UK. If it is a close Remain then Hammond or May most likely succeed Cameron and should lead the largest party in 2020, though with significant seat losses thanks to a resurgent UKIP
What resurgent UKIP ? There is a bye election next month in a Cornwall CC UKIP held seat , they have already lost it as they are not even standing a candidate . They are withering away .
If Leave win they are a pointless party. If Remain win then they will be reinvigorated - not least because there is a reasonable chance they will finally and permanently dump Farage.
Labour national campaign is shut down through until Monday. Limited local campaigning (leafleting basically) resumes Sunday afternoon.
TBH I think the Labour campaign is probably done. With tributes in the commons Monday afternoon they won't be doing anything, that only leaves the last 2 days. I argued our best strategy would be to not cause, Paignton, am appalled that it's taken the brutal murder of an MP by that "man" to bring it about
I can easily see a Tory party winning in 2020 off the back of a Leave victory.
Unless, of course, the Remainers are correct in their prediction that Brexit fecks the UK economy. In which case things that politics used to be about such as inflation, unemployment and interest rates make a comeback, Leave get the blame and we get PM Corbyn.
It's quite ironic that commentators say that the economic arguments for Remain are not gaining traction and that people are more worried about immigration. If Leave wins immigration will not fall quickly because new legislation and systems will be needed but if the economy tanks Leave will get the blame but more likely the Tory government will get the blame and yes we might get Corbyn as PM. Be careful what you vote for!
If Leave do win and then effectively take over the party then the Tories lose the centre ground and power. If remain win many 'Leavers won't accept the result and the tories could split and will lose power. Who knows what will happen but I'm not convinced the Tories will win in 2020 [or before] and given the current alternatives that is pretty piss poor for the country.
If it is Leave and Kipper Tory v Corbyn/Mcdonnell that would be a return to politics circa 1980-1983, neither would command the centre ground which would perhaps give a boost to the LDs who would have to ditch their pro EU stance in a post EU UK. If it is a close Remain then Hammond or May most likely succeed Cameron and should lead the largest party in 2020, though with significant seat losses thanks to a resurgent UKIP
What resurgent UKIP ? There is a bye election next month in a Cornwall CC UKIP held seat , they have already lost it as they are not even standing a candidate . They are withering away .
If Leave win they are a pointless party. If Remain win then they will be reinvigorated - not least because there is a reasonable chance they will finally and permanently dump Farage.
So many reasons to vote Leave: end of Farage, rise of a decent Liberal party from the grave, escaping further EU integration and retaking control of our laws.
Jesus fucking Christ. The food here at the Praia art resort, in Calabria. Fucking amazing. Just.. Fucking amazing. Fuck.
I'm a bitter, jaded old travel hack used to luxuries but.... Fuck.
Enough of that bullshit! What I want to know is, are you still voting for Leave, or are you leaving us because you are really jelly where muscle would normally be?
I can easily see a Tory party winning in 2020 off the back of a Leave victory.
Unless, of course, the Remainers are correct in their prediction that Brexit fecks the UK economy. In which case things that politics used to be about such as inflation, unemployment and interest rates make a comeback, Leave get the blame and we get PM Corbyn.
It's quite ironic that commentators say that the economic arguments for Remain are not gaining traction and that people are more worried about immigration. If Leave wins immigration will not fall quickly because new legislation and systems will be needed but if the economy tanks Leave will get the blame but more likely the Tory government will get the blame and yes we might get Corbyn as PM. Be careful what you vote for!
Can we take a slightly longer view. Assume you're correct and we have a Corbyn-led administration. Let's further assume that he does a terrible job (if he does a good job, then - carry on, Comrade). What will happen in 2025?
Since 1948 we have quadrupled gdp per capita in this country. Even the most pessimistic of the IFS models talks about lower absolute growth upon Brexit. Not an actual sustained decline. I think most commentators expect market turmoil, and a likely recession. But we've had those before, under considerably worse circumstances (e.g. 1980/1).
If Leave do win and then effectively take over the party then the Tories lose the centre ground and power. If remain win many 'Leavers won't accept the result and the tories could split and will lose power. Who knows what will happen but I'm not convinced the Tories will win in 2020 [or before] and given the current alternatives that is pretty piss poor for the country.
If it is Leave and Kipper Tory v Corbyn/Mcdonnell that would be a return to politics circa 1980-1983, neither would command the centre ground which would perhaps give a boost to the LDs who would have to ditch their pro EU stance in a post EU UK. If it is a close Remain then Hammond or May most likely succeed Cameron and should lead the largest party in 2020, though with significant seat losses thanks to a resurgent UKIP
What resurgent UKIP ? There is a bye election next month in a Cornwall CC UKIP held seat , they have already lost it as they are not even standing a candidate . They are withering away .
If Leave win they are a pointless party. If Remain win then they will be reinvigorated - not least because there is a reasonable chance they will finally and permanently dump Farage.
So many reasons to vote Leave: end of Farage, rise of a decent Liberal party from the grave, escaping further EU integration and retaking control of our laws.
What's not to like?
I agree. A proper Liberal party stripped of its Europhilia and campaigning on the basis of civil liberties and accountable governance would be well worth voting for.
If Leave do win and then effectively take over the party then the Tories lose the centre ground and power. If remain win many 'Leavers won't accept the result and the tories could split and will lose power. Who knows what will happen but I'm not convinced the Tories will win in 2020 [or before] and given the current alternatives that is pretty piss poor for the country.
If it is Leave and Kipper Tory v Corbyn/Mcdonnell that would be a return to politics circa 1980-1983, neither would command the centre ground which would perhaps give a boost to the LDs who would have to ditch their pro EU stance in a post EU UK. If it is a close Remain then Hammond or May most likely succeed Cameron and should lead the largest party in 2020, though with significant seat losses thanks to a resurgent UKIP
What resurgent UKIP ? There is a bye election next month in a Cornwall CC UKIP held seat , they have already lost it as they are not even standing a candidate . They are withering away .
If Leave win they are a pointless party. If Remain win then they will be reinvigorated - not least because there is a reasonable chance they will finally and permanently dump Farage.
So many reasons to vote Leave: end of Farage, rise of a decent Liberal party from the grave, escaping further EU integration and retaking control of our laws.
What's not to like?
I agree. A proper Liberal party stripped of its Europhilia and campaigning on the basis of civil liberties and accountable governance would be well worth voting for.
Trust me, JP Morgan will have another bunch of analysts predicting a Remain win. Investment banks are experts at being on every side of the fence.
Thanks. To be ignored then.
Edit: although that answer does show why we should also ignore prophecies of armageddon
Could even be trying to guage market sentiment by planting rumours - not that such a large and reputable company would ever consider doing that in reallife.
Trust me, JP Morgan will have another bunch of analysts predicting a Remain win. Investment banks are experts at being on every side of the fence.
Thanks. To be ignored then.
Edit: although that answer does show why we should also ignore prophecies of armageddon
Could even be trying to guage market sentiment by planting rumours - not that such a large and reputable company would ever consider doing that in reallife.
Remain solves nothing as Leave will just be more enraged at having the death at the centre of their cultural grief reenacted. Leave solves nothing because the immigration focus takes EEA membership off the table. But many Leavers want EEA membership and defeated Remainders will row in behind them. But deep than that the polling suggests this is all largely driven by socio economic factors. What strikes me from the polling is ( A) none of those factors are going away. (B) most of those factors are bugger all to do with EU membership. So leaving or remaining won't resolve the issue. Too many variables to predict much in my view.
Taking a look back at the glorious days of AV, I'm curious if there have been converts either way since then, if people have abandoned AV for FPTP or vice versa, if the PR brigade have grown in strength, if AV+ has fans, whatever happened to PR squared, and so on. I'd rather hoped such talk would be back on the table for a constitutional convention, one of the good ideas Ed M had, but sadly not.
This was D Cameron earlier. "Where we see hatred, where we see division, where we see intolerance we must drive it out of our public life and politics."
Well, were I his mother I'd be asking for the money spent on his education back. And this is meant to be a star pupil at Oxford. Give me strength.
We must drive "division" out of our politics.
What the hell does the cretin think politics is? Division is the essence of it. How power is divided. How countries and classes are divided. The division between the rich and the poor. The division between labour and capital. The division between Labour and the Conservatives. The division between worker and owner. The division between town and country. The division between the property owner and the renter.
You can't drive it out. You have to manage it. There are, always have been and always will be competing interests in any group that numbers more than 1. You learn to manage those and sometimes, quite often, in fact, you have to choose.
This is just mush and drivel.
And as for hatred, sure hatred is not a nice emotion. But it can be quite a useful emotion. Hatred of the poverty in Victorian Britain was what drove some of those who worked hard to alleviate it. Unless someone incites violence they can hate away. I don't think much of people who shout "Tory scum" at people attending conferences but they're free to do it and I'd rather have that sort of abuse than seek to drive it out of public life.
As for intolerance, what does that even mean in this context? I'm pretty intolerant of those who seek to undermine free speech. Is that sort of intolerance meant to be driven out of public life?
As this Lib Dem (along with a small but significant minority) will be voting LEAVE, I'm not sure all the sad old stereotypes of LDs being Europhiles has anything other than trolling value.
It's also worth reminding some on here Nick Clegg might have supported AV but it has never been Lib Dem policy and I voted NO as did, I suspect, a number of LDs.
Back to more immediate matters, out walking with Mrs Stodge this evening and discussing the EU Referendum (she's a LEAVE supporter too which helps domestic harmony no end). It occurred to me that in trying to finally put an end to a question which has afflicted the Conservative Party for 30 years, David Cameron unwittingly raised a question which has bothered many in Britain for sixty years.
A referendum on the EU has been replaced by a referendum on immigration.
This was D Cameron earlier. "Where we see hatred, where we see division, where we see intolerance we must drive it out of our public life and politics."
Well, were I his mother I'd be asking for the money spent on his education back. And this is meant to be a star pupil at Oxford. Give me strength.
We must drive "division" out of our politics.
What the hell does the cretin think politics is? Division is the essence of it. How power is divided. How countries and classes are divided. The division between the rich and the poor. The division between labour and capital. The division between Labour and the Conservatives. The division between worker and owner. The division between town and country. The division between the property owner and the renter.
You can't drive it out. You have to manage it. There are, always have been and always will be competing interests in any group that numbers more than 1. You learn to manage those and sometimes, quite often, in fact, you have to choose.
This is just mush and drivel.
And as for hatred, sure hatred is not a nice emotion. But it can be quite a useful emotion. Hatred of the poverty in Victorian Britain was what drove some of those who worked hard to alleviate it. Unless someone incites violence they can hate away. I don't think much of people who shout "Tory scum" at people attending conferences but they're free to do it and I'd rather have that sort of abuse than seek to drive it out of public life.
As for intolerance, what does that even mean in this context? I'm pretty intolerant of those who seek to undermine free speech. Is that sort of intolerance meant to be driven out of public life?
While I broadly agree with you, it was just a bland platitude, not a statement of intent, I'm sure.
Remain solves nothing as Leave will just be more enraged at having the death at the centre of their cultural grief reenacted. Leave solves nothing because the immigration focus takes EEA membership off the table. But many Leavers want EEA membership and defeated Remainders will row in behind them. But deep than that the polling suggests this is all largely driven by socio economic factors. What strikes me from the polling is ( A) none of those factors are going away. (B) most of those factors are bugger all to do with EU membership. So leaving or remaining won't resolve the issue. Too many variables to predict much in my view.
Actually as has been pointed out the EEA option does allow us to control immigration even within the rules of free movement of people in ways that being in the EU does not.
Also presumably we can get our fishing back. In those circumstances we could see a reinvigoration of industry in our fishing ports. That would be good as that will also help with the balance of payments.
Remain solves nothing as Leave will just be more enraged at having the death at the centre of their cultural grief reenacted. Leave solves nothing because the immigration focus takes EEA membership off the table. But many Leavers want EEA membership and defeated Remainders will row in behind them. But deep than that the polling suggests this is all largely driven by socio economic factors. What strikes me from the polling is ( A) none of those factors are going away. (B) most of those factors are bugger all to do with EU membership. So leaving or remaining won't resolve the issue. Too many variables to predict much in my view.
We will get EEA-EFTA + emergency brake, which is what a clear majority of the country want:
This was D Cameron earlier. "Where we see hatred, where we see division, where we see intolerance we must drive it out of our public life and politics."
Well, were I his mother I'd be asking for the money spent on his education back. And this is meant to be a star pupil at Oxford. Give me strength.
We must drive "division" out of our politics.
What the hell does the cretin think politics is? Division is the essence of it. How power is divided. How countries and classes are divided. The division between the rich and the poor. The division between labour and capital. The division between Labour and the Conservatives. The division between worker and owner. The division between town and country. The division between the property owner and the renter.
You can't drive it out. You have to manage it. There are, always have been and always will be competing interests in any group that numbers more than 1. You learn to manage those and sometimes, quite often, in fact, you have to choose.
This is just mush and drivel.
And as for hatred, sure hatred is not a nice emotion. But it can be quite a useful emotion. Hatred of the poverty in Victorian Britain was what drove some of those who worked hard to alleviate it. Unless someone incites violence they can hate away. I don't think much of people who shout "Tory scum" at people attending conferences but they're free to do it and I'd rather have that sort of abuse than seek to drive it out of public life.
As for intolerance, what does that even mean in this context? I'm pretty intolerant of those who seek to undermine free speech. Is that sort of intolerance meant to be driven out of public life?
I would like to see either the Scottish/Welsh MMP system, or even better the Irish STV system, used for Westminster elections. But I don't agree that AV has "undoubted merits". If anything, it would tend to exaggerate the distortions of FPTP and freeze out fringe and maverick voices.
If Leave do win and then effectively take over the party then the Tories lose the centre ground and power. If remain win many 'Leavers won't accept the result and the tories could split and will lose power. Who knows what will happen but I'm not convinced the Tories will win in 2020 [or before] and given the current alternatives that is pretty piss poor for the country.
If it is Leave and Kipper Tory v Corbyn/Mcdonnell that would be a return to politics circa 1980-1983, neither would command the centre ground which would perhaps give a boost to the LDs who would have to ditch their pro EU stance in a post EU UK. If it is a close Remain then Hammond or May most likely succeed Cameron and should lead the largest party in 2020, though with significant seat losses thanks to a resurgent UKIP
What resurgent UKIP ? There is a bye election next month in a Cornwall CC UKIP held seat , they have already lost it as they are not even standing a candidate . They are withering away .
If Leave win they are a pointless party. If Remain win then they will be reinvigorated - not least because there is a reasonable chance they will finally and permanently dump Farage.
So many reasons to vote Leave: end of Farage, rise of a decent Liberal party from the grave, escaping further EU integration and retaking control of our laws.
What's not to like?
I agree. A proper Liberal party stripped of its Europhilia and campaigning on the basis of civil liberties and accountable governance would be well worth voting for.
I would vote for them.
I might too.
In all seriousness, and I really mean this, the more I think about it the more convinced I am that only a Leave vote can restore both our politics and strengthen the UK.
This was D Cameron earlier. "Where we see hatred, where we see division, where we see intolerance we must drive it out of our public life and politics."
Well, were I his mother I'd be asking for the money spent on his education back. And this is meant to be a star pupil at Oxford. Give me strength.
We must drive "division" out of our politics.
What the hell does the cretin think politics is? Division is the essence of it. How power is divided. How countries and classes are divided. The division between the rich and the poor. The division between labour and capital. The division between Labour and the Conservatives. The division between worker and owner. The division between town and country. The division between the property owner and the renter.
You can't drive it out. You have to manage it. There are, always have been and always will be competing interests in any group that numbers more than 1. You learn to manage those and sometimes, quite often, in fact, you have to choose.
This is just mush and drivel.
And as for hatred, sure hatred is not a nice emotion. But it can be quite a useful emotion. Hatred of the poverty in Victorian Britain was what drove some of those who worked hard to alleviate it. Unless someone incites violence they can hate away. I don't think much of people who shout "Tory scum" at people attending conferences but they're free to do it and I'd rather have that sort of abuse than seek to drive it out of public life.
As for intolerance, what does that even mean in this context? I'm pretty intolerant of those who seek to undermine free speech. Is that sort of intolerance meant to be driven out of public life?
I remarked earlier that I did not understand the 'division' part at all. As ever you put it better than me.
There's no evidence of an unusual intelligence in his remarks. I wouldn't have minded platitudes, but those sentiments don't even qualify as such. Vapid bilge springs to mind.
Question on the linking of aspects of the Leave campaign (particularly Farage's poster and comments about "violence is the next step") and the death of Jo Cox.
Presumably if it had not happened then few would disagree that it would be legitimate to publicly criticise the tone of the campaign and make inferences that such campaigning has the potential to stoke tensions and lead to unfortunate consequences.
Why then when the fears of what could occur actually crystallize into dreadful reality does such criticism suddenly cease to be legitimate?
I think it is distasteful to insinuate that Vote Leave want to murder their opponents, whether or not such a murder takes place.
As this Lib Dem (along with a small but significant minority) will be voting LEAVE, I'm not sure all the sad old stereotypes of LDs being Europhiles has anything other than trolling value.
It's also worth reminding some on here Nick Clegg might have supported AV but it has never been Lib Dem policy and I voted NO as did, I suspect, a number of LDs.
Back to more immediate matters, out walking with Mrs Stodge this evening and discussing the EU Referendum (she's a LEAVE supporter too which helps domestic harmony no end). It occurred to me that in trying to finally put an end to a question which has afflicted the Conservative Party for 30 years, David Cameron unwittingly raised a question which has bothered many in Britain for sixty years.
A referendum on the EU has been replaced by a referendum on immigration.
Well, actually it's a referendum on both.
I think people will tolerate and accept immigration if they think they have some say.
I don't think anyone apart from the avid Europhiles loves the EU, but like the ideas of:
1. Trade.
2. Stopping loons in Europe turning it into a protectionist superpower.
However for a lot of people we see the loss of sovereignty and opportunity too much of a cost when in reality we have been able to do little to slow the mad EU train.
This was D Cameron earlier. "Where we see hatred, where we see division, where we see intolerance we must drive it out of our public life and politics."
Well, were I his mother I'd be asking for the money spent on his education back. And this is meant to be a star pupil at Oxford. Give me strength.
We must drive "division" out of our politics.
What the hell does the cretin think politics is? Division is the essence of it. How power is divided. How countries and classes are divided. The division between the rich and the poor. The division between labour and capital. The division between Labour and the Conservatives. The division between worker and owner. The division between town and country. The division between the property owner and the renter.
You can't drive it out. You have to manage it. There are, always have been and always will be competing interests in any group that numbers more than 1. You learn to manage those and sometimes, quite often, in fact, you have to choose.
This is just mush and drivel.
And as for hatred, sure hatred is not a nice emotion. But it can be quite a useful emotion. Hatred of the poverty in Victorian Britain was what drove some of those who worked hard to alleviate it. Unless someone incites violence they can hate away. I don't think much of people who shout "Tory scum" at people attending conferences but they're free to do it and I'd rather have that sort of abuse than seek to drive it out of public life.
As for intolerance, what does that even mean in this context? I'm pretty intolerant of those who seek to undermine free speech. Is that sort of intolerance meant to be driven out of public life?
I remarked earlier that I did not understand the 'division' part at all. As ever you put it better than me.
There's no evidence of an unusual intelligence in his remarks. I wouldn't have minded platitudes, but those sentiments don't even qualify as such. Vapid bilge springs to mind.
"division" was a whistle.
They don't care about enraging Leavers anymore. They are hoping to motivate the Remain base to turnout, and sway a couple of percent of the still undecided to swing it.
'Actually as has been pointed out the EEA option does allow us to control immigration even within the rules of free movement of people in ways that being in the EU does not.'
How apart from an emergency brake ?
'Also presumably we can get our fishing back. In those circumstances we could see a reinvigoration of industry in our fishing ports.'
Not sure about EEA, but apparently with EFTA we get back fishing, agriculture,no more European court and can negotiate our own non EU trade deals.
As this Lib Dem (along with a small but significant minority) will be voting LEAVE, I'm not sure all the sad old stereotypes of LDs being Europhiles has anything other than trolling value.
It's also worth reminding some on here Nick Clegg might have supported AV but it has never been Lib Dem policy and I voted NO as did, I suspect, a number of LDs.
Back to more immediate matters, out walking with Mrs Stodge this evening and discussing the EU Referendum (she's a LEAVE supporter too which helps domestic harmony no end). It occurred to me that in trying to finally put an end to a question which has afflicted the Conservative Party for 30 years, David Cameron unwittingly raised a question which has bothered many in Britain for sixty years.
A referendum on the EU has been replaced by a referendum on immigration.
Remain solves nothing as Leave will just be more enraged at having the death at the centre of their cultural grief reenacted. Leave solves nothing because the immigration focus takes EEA membership off the table. But many Leavers want EEA membership and defeated Remainders will row in behind them. But deep than that the polling suggests this is all largely driven by socio economic factors. What strikes me from the polling is ( A) none of those factors are going away. (B) most of those factors are bugger all to do with EU membership. So leaving or remaining won't resolve the issue. Too many variables to predict much in my view.
We will get EEA-EFTA + emergency brake, which is what a clear majority of the country want:
South Belfast was also contested after the murder of Robert Bradford and Abingdon after Airey Neave's death (although the latter was killed just before the 1979 election so no by-election was held).
I'm not sure the best response to an "attack on democracy" is effectively to suspend it. Of course Labour would easily retain the seat but there ought to be a contest so the new MP has a mandate rather than simply be gifted the seat.
The last uncontested by-election after an assassination was in North Down in 1922, after the murder of Sir Henry Wilson.
But both by-elections and uncontested elections were far more common then, in any case.
In that constituency alone, it was the third uncontested by-election in just 13 months!
Question on the linking of aspects of the Leave campaign (particularly Farage's poster and comments about "violence is the next step") and the death of Jo Cox.
Presumably if it had not happened then few would disagree that it would be legitimate to publicly criticise the tone of the campaign and make inferences that such campaigning has the potential to stoke tensions and lead to unfortunate consequences.
Why then when the fears of what could occur actually crystallize into dreadful reality does such criticism suddenly cease to be legitimate?
I think it is distasteful to insinuate that Vote Leave want to murder their opponents, whether or not such a murder takes place.
It's worse than that: they want to imply that it was Leave's campaign on immigration that led to the murder.
Ergo, implying Leave have responsibility for it, and should lose the referendum accordingly.
Comments
*retires to the saloon bar with palpitations*
[or before] and given the current alternatives that is pretty piss poor for the country.
A Leave result would also remove a large portion of the UKIP support.
I can easily see a Tory party winning in 2020 off the back of a Leave victory.
'If Leave do win and then effectively take over the party then the Tories lose the centre ground and power. If remain win many 'Leavers won't accept the result and the tories could split and will lose power.'
Can't see a problem for the Tories in the event that Leave loses provided that Cameron is replaced by a Leave leader.
Voted Yes to AV in 2011
Cambridge
Camden
Islington
Lambeth
Southwark
Oxford
Edinburgh Central
Glasgow Kelvin
Labrokes book on highest Remain in the EU vote
Edinburgh 9/4
Hackney 7/2
Southwark 5/1
Islington 6/1
Cambridge 7/1
Can't quite put my finger on what they have in common.
Not even bothering to say extremism on the headline:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-36560895
'That seems wildly optimistic to me, in the vein of those who thought the Tories would remain civil during this campaign. The wrong type of leaver could cause significant problems, as some will be seeing this as the chance to ditch the Cameroon project, and others will want to maintain it in every way but for the Leaving part.'
During the past 12 months am not exactly sure what the Cameroon project is,other than bringing forward proposals and at the first sign of trouble ditching them.
A Leave leader would be a reminder to Junker & co that if they want to ram an EU army et al down our throats then we can play the EU game & have another referendum.
I'm not sure the best response to an "attack on democracy" is effectively to suspend it. Of course Labour would easily retain the seat but there ought to be a contest so the new MP has a mandate rather than simply be gifted the seat.
Presumably if it had not happened then few would disagree that it would be legitimate to publicly criticise the tone of the campaign and make inferences that such campaigning has the potential to stoke tensions and lead to unfortunate consequences.
Why then when the fears of what could occur actually crystallize into dreadful reality does such criticism suddenly cease to be legitimate?
In which case things that politics used to be about such as inflation, unemployment and interest rates make a comeback, Leave get the blame and we get PM Corbyn.
'Stroke of genius by Remain to suspend campaigning for several days. The news stations and print media will be giving interview after interview to politicians who can make all sorts of claims. Meanwhile Leave are unable to start up the campaign for fear of being branded insensitive.'
On the other hand it keeps Carney, Osborne & project fear off the media and anyway half the country is switched off enjoying the football.
Massive call by JP Morgan if true.
There's another 6 days to go.
But that problem doesn't go away with a Leave leader. There may be some confusion over exactly what the Cameroon project is or was, but there were people implacably opposed to it nevertheless, and if a Leave leader doesn't play ball with people of the same ilk and do exactly what they want, then the government will be just as weak as it was before.
I genuinely hope whoever takes over proves competent, but it is a real worry that, given I do accept there will negative consequences to Leaving, we might well have an even crapper government.
And I trust JP Morgan's analysis on Brexit winning as much as I trust their forecasts of what would happen to them the UK economy, if we Leave.
But, nevertheless, it is interesting.
TBH I think the Labour campaign is probably done. With tributes in the commons Monday afternoon they won't be doing anything, that only leaves the last 2 days. I argued our best strategy would be to not cause, Paignton, am appalled that it's taken the brutal murder of an MP by that "man" to bring it about
What's not to like?
http://www.xe.com/currencycharts/?from=GBP&to=USD&view=12h
http://www.xe.com/currencycharts/?from=GBP&to=EUR&view=12h
NOT (At time of posting)
Where is @Scot_P when you need him to tell you the markets are going to hell in a hand cart?
Edit: although that answer does show why we should also ignore prophecies of armageddon
Has she ever expressed any empathy towards people who live in a semi in Watford ?
If not then why should they be concerned about her ?
Since 1948 we have quadrupled gdp per capita in this country. Even the most pessimistic of the IFS models talks about lower absolute growth upon Brexit. Not an actual sustained decline. I think most commentators expect market turmoil, and a likely recession. But we've had those before, under considerably worse circumstances (e.g. 1980/1).
'I actually think the biggest beneficiaries of a Leave vote would be the libdems.'
Too much baggage.
Biggest laugh I've had all day.
http://petitionmap.unboxedconsulting.com/?petition=123450&area=lon
Notice the difference between the 'trendy' Labour areas and the 'ethnic' Labour areas:
Hackney N 178
Hornsey 159
..
Barking 4
Hayes 0
Likewise outside London the difference between 'trendy' Labour and wwc Labour:
Bristol W 140
Brighton P 123
..
Redcar 0
Doncaster N 0
http://petitionmap.unboxedconsulting.com/?petition=123450&area=eng
Well, were I his mother I'd be asking for the money spent on his education back. And this is meant to be a star pupil at Oxford. Give me strength.
We must drive "division" out of our politics.
What the hell does the cretin think politics is? Division is the essence of it. How power is divided. How countries and classes are divided. The division between the rich and the poor. The division between labour and capital. The division between Labour and the Conservatives. The division between worker and owner. The division between town and country. The division between the property owner and the renter.
You can't drive it out. You have to manage it. There are, always have been and always will be competing interests in any group that numbers more than 1. You learn to manage those and sometimes, quite often, in fact, you have to choose.
This is just mush and drivel.
And as for hatred, sure hatred is not a nice emotion. But it can be quite a useful emotion. Hatred of the poverty in Victorian Britain was what drove some of those who worked hard to alleviate it. Unless someone incites violence they can hate away. I don't think much of people who shout "Tory scum" at people attending conferences but they're free to do it and I'd rather have that sort of abuse than seek to drive it out of public life.
As for intolerance, what does that even mean in this context? I'm pretty intolerant of those who seek to undermine free speech. Is that sort of intolerance meant to be driven out of public life?
As this Lib Dem (along with a small but significant minority) will be voting LEAVE, I'm not sure all the sad old stereotypes of LDs being Europhiles has anything other than trolling value.
It's also worth reminding some on here Nick Clegg might have supported AV but it has never been Lib Dem policy and I voted NO as did, I suspect, a number of LDs.
Back to more immediate matters, out walking with Mrs Stodge this evening and discussing the EU Referendum (she's a LEAVE supporter too which helps domestic harmony no end). It occurred to me that in trying to finally put an end to a question which has afflicted the Conservative Party for 30 years, David Cameron unwittingly raised a question which has bothered many in Britain for sixty years.
A referendum on the EU has been replaced by a referendum on immigration.
Also presumably we can get our fishing back. In those circumstances we could see a reinvigoration of industry in our fishing ports. That would be good as that will also help with the balance of payments.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/06/11/uk-voters-back-norway-style-brexit-poll-reveals/
I have heard exactly no one calling for a cancellation of the referendum, and I'm on a train to Cambridge.
Perhaps non-anecdote alert would have been a better title.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thoughtcrime
We must all think as we're told to and do as we're told to.
In all seriousness, and I really mean this, the more I think about it the more convinced I am that only a Leave vote can restore both our politics and strengthen the UK.
There's no evidence of an unusual intelligence in his remarks. I wouldn't have minded platitudes, but those sentiments don't even qualify as such. Vapid bilge springs to mind.
I think people will tolerate and accept immigration if they think they have some say.
I don't think anyone apart from the avid Europhiles loves the EU, but like the ideas of:
1. Trade.
2. Stopping loons in Europe turning it into a protectionist superpower.
However for a lot of people we see the loss of sovereignty and opportunity too much of a cost when in reality we have been able to do little to slow the mad EU train.
They don't care about enraging Leavers anymore. They are hoping to motivate the Remain base to turnout, and sway a couple of percent of the still undecided to swing it.
(Good evening, everyone)
'Actually as has been pointed out the EEA option does allow us to control immigration even within the rules of free movement of people in ways that being in the EU does not.'
How apart from an emergency brake ?
'Also presumably we can get our fishing back. In those circumstances we could see a reinvigoration of industry in our fishing ports.'
Not sure about EEA, but apparently with EFTA we get back fishing, agriculture,no more European court and can negotiate our own non EU trade deals.
But both by-elections and uncontested elections were far more common then, in any case.
In that constituency alone, it was the third uncontested by-election in just 13 months!
Ergo, implying Leave have responsibility for it, and should lose the referendum accordingly.