Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Boris backs Brexit but will it have an impact if he’s not g

135678

Comments

  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,317
    Speedy said:

    It seems that Boris made the right choice, every PB tory is chanting Boris for PM.

    Every PB Tory? I feel left out now :(
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,767
    edited February 2016

    Hence the possibility of a major row on the Leave side over Brexit terms. I do, indeed, have no idea. Neither does anyone else. And no-one can provide a definitive answer. The day after a Remain vote we will know exactly where we are. The day after a Leave vote we will have no clue at all.

    theres equally the possibility of a major row on the remain side.

    So what ?
  • SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    RobD said:

    Every PB Tory? I feel left out now :(
    Well almost.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 54,546
    edited February 2016
    rcs1000 said:

    The easiest, and simplest, option is for us to go "Full EFTA". That is, we'd rejoin EFTA, and with it all of its existing trade agreements - with the EU, Canada, etc.

    The next easiest would be for us to go the Swiss route, and negotiate bilateral treaties with the EU like Switzerland has done. This would be harder, as there there would be a lot of 'one on one' discussions with the EU, and it could take a long, long time.
    The EEA agreements list all the member states individually as contracting parties. Would our withdrawal from the EU necessarily annul the EEA agreement that we're already party to? It doesn't seem obvious that we could be expelled from the EEA if we wished to remain part of it on the same terms.
  • Hence the possibility of a major row on the Leave side over Brexit terms. I do, indeed, have no idea. Neither does anyone else. And no-one can provide a definitive answer. The day after a Remain vote we will know exactly where we are. The day after a Leave vote we will have no clue at all.

    Good. If everyone on the Leave side agreed with Farage or Galloway then I'd have no doubt and would be backing Remain wholeheartedly. The fact that moderate voices are going for Leave now gives me confidence that we could have a rational Leave rather than one based on hatred.
  • Yep, it seems a good part of the Tory Out side is focused on looking after the City and is not that concerned about limiting free movement of people. Boris is certainly in that camp, as are a few on here. They could probably get a Brexit deal done pretty quickly. Msybe it wouldn't even end up as a full Brexit. But my guess is that this would not meet with universal approval, to say the least, on the Out side.

    Yes, that is correct. If we do get a Leave result, the debate will switch to whether to go for an EEA-style deal or not. Much the same arguments will apply as we are currently seeing, and I expect it will be just as contentious.

    The difference is that it would probably be parliament which decides. It could get very messy, because I think a majority of MPs are (probably) likely to want the EEA route, but a lot of Leave voters would have thought they were voting for killing off free movement.
  • The EEA agreements list all the member states individually. Would our withdrawal from the EU necessarily annul the EEA agreement that we're already party to? It doesn't seem obvious that we could be expelled from the EEA if we wished to remain part of it on the same terms.
    On a technical basis are we listed as an EEA member in our own rights and not as part of the EU?
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 38,381

    Hence the possibility of a major row on the Leave side over Brexit terms. I do, indeed, have no idea. Neither does anyone else. And no-one can provide a definitive answer. The day after a Remain vote we will know exactly where we are. The day after a Leave vote we will have no clue at all.

    That's why we should hold a general election in the event of a Leave vote.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,600
    Speedy said:

    It seems that Boris made the right choice, every PB tory is chanting Boris for PM.

    Not all, Richard N certainly is not
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 59,098

    On a technical basis are we listed as an EEA member in our own rights and not as part of the EU?
    I don't believe so, no. But this is a grey area, and one that Richard Tyndall has been doing a lot of work on.
  • Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    Lawyers For Britain are pretty good right now

    http://www.lawyersforbritain.org/
    Cyclefree said:

    There have been loads of such reports already. They ping into my inbox on a daily basis.

  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 54,546
    edited February 2016

    On a technical basis are we listed as an EEA member in our own rights and not as part of the EU?
    There's some ambiguity as we were already part of the EC when the agreement was drafted - http://www.efta.int/media/documents/legal-texts/eea/the-eea-agreement/Main Text of the Agreement/EEAagreement.pdf

    Each new member upon joining the EU has it's own separate agreement to become part of the EEA.

  • On a technical basis are we listed as an EEA member in our own rights and not as part of the EU?

    No, we are signatories in our capacity as EU members. The EEA agreement is basically an agreement between the three EEA countries and the EU. We'd have to agree a new treaty with the 30 other countries to join as EEA members.
  • chestnut said:

    Would it be that hard to pull the EFTA agreements off the shelf, approach the same partners they have, strike the same/similar deals - except with the EU?

    With the EU, they'd have to have a rethink given their substantial profit from dealing with us.
    Joining efta eea means no substantive change to where we are now. This is no really bad thing, we pull out of all the eu Parliament suff, put Farage out of a job and send him on his way to the Big Brother House and Strictly Come Dancing, and stay in the single market and free movement of labour and continue to implement the EUs regulations.
    Efta even has its own court to rule over its members, based in Luxembourg.
  • Roger said:

    Ken Clark or Boris? Everyone loves a clown but unless people treat this referendum as a trip to the circus when it comes to trusting the judgement of the respective sides the amiable and always reasonable Ken will trump Boris every day of the week.


    Alistaire Meeks is right. The team line-ups look like Respected Public Figures V The Mavericks and the more high profile chancers like Boris that join the more oddball the Maverics seem.

    The Maastricht Rebels were a perfect template for this. All we remember is a man in a funny striped jacket and a strange short lady surrounded by some seriously odd grinning blokes. I daresay they were all serious but collectively they came across as a freak-show

    This isn't a reflection on the wit and wisdom of Boris it's just that most people see him as a joke. Joining a team with players seen as weird and even slightly sinister like Gove Farage IDS and Galloway makes them collectively look like Maastricht Rebels MK2

    Everyone of those "respected public figures" said we would go to hell in a handcart if we didn't join the Euro. Not one of them has a sliver of credibility yet sycophantic idiots like you believe every word they say.

    Meeks may well be a very intelligent man, but his sneering elitist attitude to anyone who disagrees with him is shows a crushingly dull spirit with no other outlook on life other than play it safe.

    Have any of you Remainers got anything positive to say about the EU or will you just spend the next few months insulting anyone who disagrees with you frighteningly intellectual superior beings?
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 59,098
    Cyclefree said:

    There have been loads of such reports already. They ping into my inbox on a daily basis.

    Most (all) compare Remain with Leave/EEA, though.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,600
    Roger said:

    Ken Clark or Boris? Everyone loves a clown but unless people treat this referendum as a trip to the circus when it comes to trusting the judgement of the respective sides the amiable and always reasonable Ken will trump Boris every day of the week.


    Alistaire Meeks is right. The team line-ups look like Respected Public Figures V The Mavericks and the more high profile chancers like Boris that join the more oddball the Maverics seem.

    The Maastricht Rebels were a perfect template for this. All we remember is a man in a funny striped jacket and a strange short lady surrounded by some seriously odd grinning blokes. I daresay they were all serious but collectively they came across as a freak-show

    This isn't a reflection on the wit and wisdom of Boris it's just that most people see him as a joke. Joining a team with players seen as weird and even slightly sinister like Gove Farage IDS and Galloway makes them collectively look like Maastricht Rebels MK2

    At the end of the day referendums are one on the issues not personalities, see Scotland
  • Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    Piffle, and you know it.
    Speedy said:

    It seems that Boris made the right choice, every PB tory is chanting Boris for PM.

  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,607

    Yes, but for the most part the deal has been well received by the City.

    What we really need is a heavyweight report by City lawyers on the effect on the City of the three options (Remain, Leave/EEA, Leave/Something else). I expect there will be some such reports over the next couple of months.
    What the City wants most of all is access to the single market. What they don't want is a load of stupid rules and taxes imposed by countries who either understand nothing about financial markets or are determined to harm the UK's one in the hope that they will get the benefit, without any ability for Britain to stop it. (Oh I forgot: they can ask for a discussion. Fantastic. I expect there will be cartwheels around the City at that.)

    That is what Cameron's brilliant negotiation has got them. The square root of f*** all.
  • theres equally the possibility of a major row on the remain side.

    So what ?

    I think a Remain vote provides more certainty, at least in the short term. Leavers seem more passionate and hence more likely to feel betrayed if the final Brexit terms are not to their liking. I guess we'll find out soon enough.

  • Cyclefree said:

    There have been loads of such reports already. They ping into my inbox on a daily basis.

    Can you point us to any?
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 98,353
    edited February 2016
    EPG said:

    They won.
    Then a decade later people got sick of them, and they went back to the way things were, apparently for ever
    The impact of their victory was much more long lasting than you apparently believe, and greatly informed the political and social developments of the decades to follow. That we did not remain a Republic, the most obvious development, does not discount that - it's not as though that was even the original goal of the civil war.
  • Will that include the companies controlled by the Government? Also the ones with very low corporation tax payments etc etc. In the current climate any major company considering entering the political sphere needs to ensure it has a squeaky clean image and a great record in paying tax and delivering customer service. People such as British Gas etc need to stay away.
    Go ahead ignore facts. Why am I not surprised at your twisting.
  • Sean_F said:

    That's why we should hold a general election in the event of a Leave vote.

    Yep, I agree with that. The Tory manifesto would be fascinating and could genuinely split the party.

  • SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    rcs1000 said:

    I don't believe so, no. But this is a grey area, and one that Richard Tyndall has been doing a lot of work on.
    One of the advantages for Leave is that they have a whole menu of options for post-Brexit, while Remain has only the substandard deal to offer.
    Leave offers a lot of options, so if you don't like one they have others on the table.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,767

    I think a Remain vote provides more certainty, at least in the short term. Leavers seem more passionate and hence more likely to feel betrayed if the final Brexit terms are not to their liking. I guess we'll find out soon enough.

    only in the short term.

    Remain has no more certainty over what it has just signed up to than leave, Paradoxically Leave probably offers more certainty in the medium to long term.
  • surbiton said:

    That depends on a lot what Kasich does.

    By the way, what is Trump's view on health care ? I know he has sound bites against Obamacare but what if "Universal care" is mentioned.

    What is Trump's position on Israel ? Same as every other US politician ?
    Trump supports healthcare, he doesn't like Obamacare because it favours the drug companies.

    Trump has promised to be neutral on Israel-Palestine, has rejected calls to make Jerusalem the capital of Israel and has also said the Israelis are partially to blame for the violence. So no, definitely not like every other US politician. He supports a traditional isolationist/America First realist foreign policy. Be interesting to see who he picks for his foreign policy team, been meeting General Mike Flynn a lot, would be a superb pick. Of course Trump has already cast aspersions on the official story regarding MH17 and Litvinenko, the official stories being obvious nonsense.

    Interesting despite Cruz mimicking Trump's rhetoric he has gone full on neocon in his foreign policy picks with Woolsey, Abrams and even suggesting John Bolton as Secretary of State! Scary stuff.

    Rubio will be easy to take down with him being a memeber of the gang of eight for amnesty. Plus of course the sinister financial backers behind him.

    https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/649237053121687552

    Looks plain sailing for Trump now anyway.
  • GIN1138 said:

    You don't think the Gove/Johnson partnership could be quite a powerful combination (Gove the brains, Johnson the "front man") then?
    Like Blair Brown then?
  • Cyclefree said:

    That is what Cameron's brilliant negotiation has got them. The square root of f*** all.

    So you keep saying, but the City doesn't seem to think so. (Nor does the Beeb, for that matter).

    In any case, that isn't even quite the point. The point is, would an EEA-style deal be better in that respect? (I'm 99% sure the answer is No, it would be worse, but IANAL). Or, alternatively, is there any other deal which would give the full access to the Single Market without the danger?
  • isamisam Posts: 41,138

    I think a Remain vote provides more certainty, at least in the short term. Leavers seem more passionate and hence more likely to feel betrayed if the final Brexit terms are not to their liking. I guess we'll find out soon enough.

    The hated Melanie Phillips put it quite well on Daily Politics earlier

    To paraphrase "Yes REMAIN offers more certainty, the certainty of servitude"
  • taffystaffys Posts: 9,753

    only in the short term.

    Remain has no more certainty over what it has just signed up to than leave, Paradoxically Leave probably offers more certainty in the medium to long term.
    Quite. the notion the EU is going to stay the same is a completely false one. They are bent on ever closer union.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Boiling down to the bold visionaries against the cautious managers.

    Boris for next PM whether the Remain or Leave wins.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 22,100

    Like Blair Brown then?
    Johnson is to the Tories what Prescott once was to New Labour.

  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,966
    edited February 2016
    So Boris and Gove, quite possibly the next PM and Chancellor come out for leave. I didn't think Tim Montgomery could look any more stupid but I once again underestimated the man. What a fool.
  • taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    Jonathan said:

    Johnson is to the Tories what Prescott once was to New Labour.

    I don;t think I've ever read a more ridiculous comparison.
  • Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    Seriously, you're citing the BBC?

    So you keep saying, but the City doesn't seem to think so. (Nor does the Beeb, for that matter).

    In any case, that isn't even quite the point. The point is, would an EEA-style deal be better in that respect? (I'm 99% sure the answer is No, it would be worse, but IANAL). Or, alternatively, is there any other deal which would give the full access to the Single Market without the danger?
  • tlg86 said:

    For once I agree with you. Do you think Gove has ambitions to be leader?
    I think that if Remain win we could see Gove as Chancellor, if he fancies it. Mmmm... I'm not sure if he would be any good. Not sure really who would make it as next chancellor.
  • Seriously, you're citing the BBC?

    Best I could find! (Well, apart from the Indy, and I drew the line at citing them!)
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 22,100
    taffys said:

    I don;t think I've ever read a more ridiculous comparison.
    A bit harsh on Prescott perhaps.
  • isam said:

    The hated Melanie Phillips put it quite well on Daily Politics earlier

    To paraphrase "Yes REMAIN offers more certainty, the certainty of servitude"

    Clearly Melanie has never lived in servitude.

  • So you keep saying, but the City doesn't seem to think so. (Nor does the Beeb, for that matter).

    In any case, that isn't even quite the point. The point is, would an EEA-style deal be better in that respect? (I'm 99% sure the answer is No, it would be worse, but IANAL). Or, alternatively, is there any other deal which would give the full access to the Single Market without the danger?
    How about a reciprocal agreement whereby they can trade with us? After all we import £3 billion a year from them than we export, so surely it would be in their interest, no?
  • chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341

    Joining efta eea means no substantive change to where we are now. This is no really bad thing, we pull out of all the eu Parliament suff, put Farage out of a job and send him on his way to the Big Brother House and Strictly Come Dancing, and stay in the single market and free movement of labour and continue to implement the EUs regulations.
    Efta even has its own court to rule over its members, based in Luxembourg.

    I'm not suggesting that we join EFTA; I'm suggesting we use their agreements as base documents and then seek to mirror their trade agreements in bi-lateral negotiations with their existing partners.

    With the EU we would do that but reject their social policy demands.I'm unconvinced that the EU would seek trade barriers as a price for removing EU social impositions, as they make a big profit from our existing arrangement.

  • Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    Melanie regularly gets the highest comment tallies and positive feedback on Times articles.

    She says the unsayable in the face of personal abuse let through by their moderaters.
    isam said:

    The hated Melanie Phillips put it quite well on Daily Politics earlier

    To paraphrase "Yes REMAIN offers more certainty, the certainty of servitude"
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,317

    Piffle, and you know it.

    Might have to make a new avatar to identify myself as PB Tory Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary. :p
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549

    Seriously, you're citing the BBC?

    Oh, dear ! The Tories are at each other already. Citing the BBC ? What has the world come to ?
  • mattmatt Posts: 3,789

    Clearly Melanie has never lived in servitude.

    She gives the impression of quite liking Palestinians to be kept in that state.
  • geoffwgeoffw Posts: 8,978
    "The alternative to remaining in a structurally unsafe building is, of course, walking out." – Dan Hannan.
    http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/02/what-britain-would-look-like-after-brexit/
  • WandererWanderer Posts: 3,838
    DavidL said:

    So Boris and Gove, quite possibly the next PM and Chancellor come out for leave. I didn't think Tim Montgomery could look any more stupid but I once again underestimated the man. What a fool.

    Yes, another weird misreading from him. Predicting what's going to happen is not his forte. (He must have one, mustn't he?)
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 23,983
    TGOHF said:

    Boiling down to the bold visionaries against the cautious managers.

    There are two kinds of people in the world. There are those which, if you gave them a precious vase to carry across the room, would carefully manouvre the vase from one side of the room to the other. And there are those who will get flustered, impatient or bolshy, then drop, throw or kick the vase into a thousand pieces, and then blame it on you. I understand the importance of the latter, but I will usually side with the former.
  • Jonathan said:

    A bit harsh on Prescott perhaps.
    Prescott was New Labour’s token uneducated, ignorant pleb; don’t think that applies to Boris.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 98,353
    Say Remain win and Cameron has to give Boris a key Cabinet post so as not to appear petty, presumably we will be back to the Blair/Brown situation of the guys at the top pretending to make nice while all the while scheming against each other, a far cry from the mostly harmonious top team we've had (even considering the Coalition) for some time.

    At least with a Leave win they'll end up united again. Eventually.
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,607
    edited February 2016
    RobD said:

    What's wrong with giving the city an unfair advantage? Isn't it the same as a country lowering corporation tax, for instance?
    There is nothing wrong with having a British Prime Minister fighting for a British sector, a profitable one.

    The financial sector is not asking for an unfair advantage - or competition, as it is usually known - but not to made subject to eurozone rules when, er, we are not in the eurozone. What the other states want is to stop the city being competitive because it might show up their own failings.

    Also note in some cases what this stops is individual countries having stronger rules than those proposed by the EU. So even if you think that, say, your insurers should be subject to X and Y rules (and you want to do this because this gives the public reassurance) if the EU says that only X is permitted, then you cannot do this. In other words, the EU can sometimes stop national governments providing more protection for consumers.

    It's the absurdity of the one size fits all mentality and a desire to avoid any sort of competition. It's what happens when you get formulation of rules by bureaucrats who have no instinctive or any sort of understanding of free markets, competition or, indeed, the details of how this sector works at all. And what it also means is that if they make a mistake in regulation, they make it across the entire area. And if that mistake is a vital one the consequences are felt by everyone and are magnified. One size fits all regulation, when it goes wrong - and note that I say when, not if, because it will go wrong or be found wanting at some point - creates - or has the potential for creating - a systemic risk.


  • Prescott was New Labour’s token uneducated, ignorant pleb; don’t think that applies to Boris.
    That's a bit harsh on uneducated ignorant plebs...
  • taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    The fact is nobody really knows what the City would look like after Brexit. Losing the single market would be a big hit to euro denominated business, probably, but there could be offsetting benefits in less aggressively socialist, controlling regulation. And the euro business might come back.

    In the end, its a judgement call.
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    HYUFD said:

    At the end of the day referendums are one on the issues not personalities, see Scotland
    Support for Scottiah Independence started it's late surge in the Polling following Salmond's demolition job on Darling in the second debate.

    Who knows what might have been if Salmond hadn't been utter pish in the first debate.
  • Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    Oh, I lurve your burkha :heart:
    RobD said:

    Might have to make a new avatar to identify myself as PB Tory Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary. :p
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,317
    kle4 said:

    Say Remain win and Cameron has to give Boris a key Cabinet post so as not to appear petty, presumably we will be back to the Blair/Brown situation of the guys at the top pretending to make nice while all the while scheming against each other, a far cry from the mostly harmonious top team we've had (even considering the Coalition) for some time.

    At least with a Leave win they'll end up united again. Eventually.

    Except Cameron won't be around for much longer after the referendum, so it wouldn't be a long term situation.
  • mattmatt Posts: 3,789

    Can you point us to any?
    You'll find them on this websites: slaughter and May and hogan Lovells are quite interesting for examole. However, they don't give certainty as to next steps because they don't know what they will be. Instead there's a range of options and possibilities.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,317

    Oh, I lurve your burkha :heart:

    Thanks, it was taken against a black background. Probably not the wisest choice :p
  • To all those on PB who think the Tories are done for over the EU Ref..they could split..engage in bloody warfare..eat each others dead bodies on the battlefield..crap them out..eat them again.. crap them out... and still beat Corbyn in 2020

    Yet more Daily Doddy Drib....

    Actually no. Apologies. You are absolutely right here. Moreover I honestly don't think the Tories will split. There may or may not be bad blood. I don't know as I am not in the Tory party. But the attempts so far by the LEAVE Tories to try and maintain a decorous relationship makes me think that they may get through this okay so long as Cameron doesn't do anything else stupid like set the attack dogs on the LEAVE Tories.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    Speedy said:

    One of the advantages for Leave is that they have a whole menu of options for post-Brexit, while Remain has only the substandard deal to offer.
    Leave offers a lot of options, so if you don't like one they have others on the table.
    Yes. The EEA / EFTA / NAFTA / just USA / Commonwealth / Empire....... / link with Mars
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 98,353

    Clearly Melanie has never lived in servitude.

    I'm sure she hasn't, but since when has colorful expression been allowed to undermine a point?

    Edit: Wait, it always has. Although we then criticise people for blandness when they try to avoid it. Morton's Fork right there, end up being dismissed the same way but for different reasons.
  • Everyone of those "respected public figures" said we would go to hell in a handcart if we didn't join the Euro. Not one of them has a sliver of credibility yet sycophantic idiots like you believe every word they say.

    Meeks may well be a very intelligent man, but his sneering elitist attitude to anyone who disagrees with him is shows a crushingly dull spirit with no other outlook on life other than play it safe.

    Have any of you Remainers got anything positive to say about the EU or will you just spend the next few months insulting anyone who disagrees with you frighteningly intellectual superior beings?
    Positive parts of the EU:
    Free market and free trade across Europe.
    A British passport becomes a European passport and allows you to holiday, move, work or retire to any nation in Europe without going through a visa process first.
  • Best I could find! (Well, apart from the Indy, and I drew the line at citing them!)
    City is quoted to be satisfied in the Sunday Times. I have not noticed any howling complaints quoted anywhere.
    I think itssafe to say the mainstream press have lost any interest they have ever had in facts or issues now. They have what they want to sell papers. Boris v Dave. Well really its Boris v anyone they can imagine. You have to puty the poor public.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 98,353
    RobD said:

    Except Cameron won't be around for much longer after the referendum, so it wouldn't be a long term situation.
    That had been my assumption when I thought the referendum would be in late 2017, that he would announce he'd stand down in a year or something as time for a new leader etc, but with it being so early, I assumed that was at least partly so if he won, it would be far too early to talk about him going, even though the party would have torn itself to bits.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,966

    So you keep saying, but the City doesn't seem to think so. (Nor does the Beeb, for that matter).

    In any case, that isn't even quite the point. The point is, would an EEA-style deal be better in that respect? (I'm 99% sure the answer is No, it would be worse, but IANAL). Or, alternatively, is there any other deal which would give the full access to the Single Market without the danger?
    Absolutely nothing in Cameron's deal is of any substance but that doesn't really matter. It will be lost in the debate to come: are we better off in the EU or out of it?

    As I have repeatedly said this is a very complicated question and the answer is far from clear cut. I think the answer to your question is that it really won't make much difference. If the EZ begin to use their QMV it really won't matter whether we are in or out. We will be outvoted anyway.

    The question is whether there is more benefits to being out that offset the possible loss of influence from staying in. Both of these are "hopes" and uncertain so the answer is unclear but for me the compelling obligation is on Remain to show why things are going to be ok if we stay put.
  • kle4 said:

    I'm sure she hasn't, but since when has colorful expression been allowed to undermine a point?

    Edit: Wait, it always has. Although we then criticise people for blandness when they try to avoid it. Morton's Fork right there, end up being dismissed the same way but for different reasons.

    She can say anything she likes. And I am free to think that she is talking rubbish.

  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 30,516
    isam said:



    The hated Melanie Phillips put it quite well on Daily Politics earlier

    To paraphrase "Yes REMAIN offers more certainty, the certainty of servitude"

    It isn't certainty people will get, it's absolution from responsibility. No matter how bad it gets, some people just want it to be someone else's decision. If it all goes wrong they can moan about the EU in the queue to the re-education camp. 'Leave' means taking responsibility. People don't want to do that.
  • taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    edited February 2016
    The problem for a Brexit government is priorities.

    If we really do want an Australian points system for our immigration policy, then the trade deal we can cut with the EU will probably be a pretty poor one. If we can get one at all.

    Again, we could probably get some better ones elsewhere, so as with finance its swings and roundabouts.
  • WandererWanderer Posts: 3,838
    Sean_F said:

    That's why we should hold a general election in the event of a Leave vote.
    I agree with you on that. But the FTPA is still there.
  • He is entitled to think we ought to leave the eu without committing to tramping the country to argue so. All govt ministers still have their jobs to do as well. They will get plenty opportunity to display their otherwise loyalty in parliament as well.

    What Boris has not done other than a generality is suggest where we ought to go, how we sensibly get there and define just what the end term difference will really be.
    The Sunday Times Business quotes the city as being releived ar the outcome of the negotiations and satisfied with the safeguards and that 50 of the FTSE100 leaders will be writing an official letter of support for continued membership.
    David Smith the Sunday Times Economics Editor confirms that immigration has a net economic benefit and that net migration from the EU is lower than other migration and that of the (larger) remainder a significant part is students here to study.
    If they are basing that optimism on what they have been told by Cameron then they are going to be sadly disappointed when realty sets in. There is no protection for the city. None at all.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @afneil: Now read BoGo's embargoed column on Brexit for tomorrow's Telegraph. Not a patch on Gove's exegesis.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,317
    Wanderer said:

    I agree with you on that. But the FTPA is still there.
    A crappy piece of legislation.
  • Positive parts of the EU:
    Free market and free trade across Europe.
    A British passport becomes a European passport and allows you to holiday, move, work or retire to any nation in Europe without going through a visa process first.
    Free market and free trade will not end, as we run a £3 billion trade deficit with them, unless of course they are so spiteful they shoot themselves in the foot,

    I don't care one bit about visas, as they would need one to come here so as IDS was correct in saying, we would be safer.

    I'll take on all comers tonight, any more Remainers come up with what they see as a positive?
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 23,983
    kle4 said:

    Say Remain win and Cameron has to give Boris a key Cabinet post...

    If Remain win, Cameron won't have to do anything. As Bush II said, "I have political capital. I intend to spend it.".

    Or, as Pat Robertson said: "you don’t strike the king unless you kill him"
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 98,353
    edited February 2016

    She can say anything she likes. And I am free to think that she is talking rubbish.

    Of course you are. I wouldn't term my objection to the EU as she did there either. But her point was clearly metaphorical, and her being in actual servitude has nothing to do with whether her point was rubbish. Presumably I am free to think that as well.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 59,098
    Wanderer said:

    I agree with you on that. But the FTPA is still there.
    The FTPA can be repealed by a simple act of parliament.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,600
    Alistair said:

    Support for Scottiah Independence started it's late surge in the Polling following Salmond's demolition job on Darling in the second debate.

    Who knows what might have been if Salmond hadn't been utter pish in the first debate.
    The result was 55-45, exactly the same as ICM was polling in the summer, well before the debates!
  • With its 25% immigrant population.
    Focus on us staying in the single market and common standards and free movement of labour and people. Focus on Norways 15% immigrant population.
    Focus on being in the EEA is not much different to being in the EU.
    Why is it only I am offering a coherent option for us out of the EU.
    Excuse me? I have been advocating the Norway option for bloody years on here.

    Stealing my bloody clothes!! Hrumpph.
  • Wanderer said:

    I agree with you on that. But the FTPA is still there.
    ...and is trivial to get around.

  • Scott_P said:

    @afneil: Now read BoGo's embargoed column on Brexit for tomorrow's Telegraph. Not a patch on Gove's exegesis.

    Well he probably knocked up before lunch this morning...
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 30,516
    surbiton said:

    Yes. The EEA / EFTA / NAFTA / just USA / Commonwealth / Empire....... / link with Mars
    You'd never imagine from the puddles on the floor being left by Remainers here that we weren't even in this ridiculous organisation until 1973.
  • Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,822
    edited February 2016
    DavidL said:

    As I have repeatedly said this is a very complicated question and the answer is far from clear cut. I think the answer to your question is that it really won't make much difference. If the EZ begin to use their QMV it really won't matter whether we are in or out. We will be outvoted anyway.

    I agree it's complex, but in the large view: having zero votes in QMV makes us more likely to be outvoted than having one vote in QMV, and having institutional protection in the treaties (beefed up by the renegotiation) is better than having no protection - in an EEA-style deal there would not be even a nominal requirement not to discriminate against us. So it seems to me pretty much 100% clear that the EEA route cannot possibly be better, and very probably would be worse, in this respect.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,317
    Scott_P said:

    @afneil: Now read BoGo's embargoed column on Brexit for tomorrow's Telegraph. Not a patch on Gove's exegesis.

    BoGo? His new nickname thanks to his recent announcement? :D
  • WandererWanderer Posts: 3,838
    rcs1000 said:

    The FTPA can be repealed by a simple act of parliament.
    Of course, but not in a hurry if the Lords object and not at all if a Commons majority is lacking (which it might be).
  • kle4 said:

    Of course you are. I wouldn't term my objection to the EU as she did there either. But her point was clearly metaphorical, and her being in actual servitude has nothing to do with whether her point was rubbish. Presumably I am free to think that as well.

    No, you're not, damn you :-D

  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,767
    rcs1000 said:

    The FTPA can be repealed by a simple act of parliament.
    OK Robert I'm joining you. after two days the EUref has proved to be lttle more than mindless guff on the threads.

    Can we talk about the impending August implosion of capital markets instead ?
  • Free market and free trade will not end, as we run a £3 billion trade deficit with them, unless of course they are so spiteful they shoot themselves in the foot,

    I don't care one bit about visas, as they would need one to come here so as IDS was correct in saying, we would be safer.

    I'll take on all comers tonight, any more Remainers come up with what they see as a positive?
    I would guess on the second part not that much would change. It is in the interest of both EU and Britain to allow European passport holders to holiday, move and work in different countries. And UK Business would lobby incredibly hard to ensure that the access to cheap labour from Eastern Europe coming to live in the UK and in Europe itself remains.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 30,516

    Well he probably knocked up before lunch this morning...
    I'd imagine it's not meant to be particularly good.
  • RogerRoger Posts: 20,320
    HYUFD said:

    At the end of the day referendums are one on the issues not personalities, see Scotland
    I think that's right if the choice is relatively straightforward like the Scottish one. This is far more complex and under these circumstances voters will by and large be influenced by who is making the argument. Rather like a general election.
  • If they are basing that optimism on what they have been told by Cameron then they are going to be sadly disappointed when realty sets in. There is no protection for the city. None at all.
    They have read the agreement. Countries outside the eurzone can regulate their own financial institutions. Its easy to spout all sorts of conjecture when tou start 'If...'
  • WandererWanderer Posts: 3,838

    ...and is trivial to get around.

    If you mean the auto-no-confidence-suicide-manoeuvre I don't think that's a goer.
  • RobD said:

    Maybe it's just me, but I hope that ministers haven't been deciding which way to lean based on how it would impact their leadership prospects. Country first and all that.

    "No, the country comes first!" - Liz Kendall, 2015.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 98,353
    viewcode said:

    If Remain win, Cameron won't have to do anything. As Bush II said, "I have political capital. I intend to spend it.".

    Or, as Pat Robertson said: "you don’t strike the king unless you kill him"
    Ok. Say he wins and does give Boris a key Cabinet post then. Granted, while the early politeness and talk of retaining/promoting Leavers should Remain win are just statements of intent, given how divided the party is on the issue, it seems at least probable that will remain the strategy in a futile attempt to keep a lid on division.

    Cameron isn't coming out of this stronger if Remain wins - too many Leavers will be too bitter to have that happen. Yes, that is just a guess, but the intensity of many people in Leave, and the intensity of their rubbishing of the deal Cameron made and how he presented it, will surely ensure that enough will remain(ha) pissed off enough in great enough numbers that they will need to be mollified.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    My condolences. Nairobi is awful.

    Though the Stanley is very nice.
    What? Has to be the Muthaiga in Nairobi

    https://www.mcc.co.ke/Home.aspx
  • If Leave wins, my money would be on Boris as PM and Gove as Foreign Secretary. Perhaps Patel as Home Secretary. Maybe even Andrea Leadsom as Chancellor.

    You'd need Leavers doing the biggest jobs during the renegotiation.

    There would be a reconciliation reshuffle, with Remainers being brought into the cabinet too, but Osborne and May would be toast.

    Gove is the man I'd want batting for Britain in the exit negotiations.

    He would be superb.
  • Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    He's getting ruthless :smiley:
    RobD said:
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 83,160
    edited February 2016
    Well as the first full day of the campaign draws to a close, I see we have had a day arguing over the substantial key issues.

    Cameron - Look at those dodgy f##kers on Team Leave

    IDS - If we remain, ISIS is going to come and blow us all up

    Boris - Huzzzzahhh
This discussion has been closed.