politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » First post EU deal referendum poll has REMAIN with 15% lead
There is no recent Survation EU phone polling to compare it to so it is hard to judge the impact. We do know that phone polls have been showing much bigger leads for IN than online ones.
I'm spitballing ideas in my head for a thread, and could do with the thoughts of PBers.
Let us imagine Remain win, and wins big, say by 20%, it might not settle it for a generation if the EU don't hold up their end of the bargain.
We could see another referendum within five years?
Or am I talking bollocks?
Pretty certain it will settle it for 15 years. Ultimately Europe will face some amjor challenges, whether we are in the EU or not. "A generation" maybe not.
unless there was ever a possibility we joined the Euro
That is where the FO will try to take us next, if they win. Rely on it
Personally I cannot see Remain winning by more than 52%-48% and with 80% opposed to the Euro there is no chance we join that. For example I would join the No campaign if this was a referendum on the Euro but I am prepared to back the Remain campaign when the issue is membership of the EU as a whole
According to the Survation poll for The Mail on Sunday, 48 per cent of voters want to stay in the EU, with 33 in favour of leaving, and 19 per cent undecided. The first survey conducted since Mr Cameron’s marathon talks in Brussels on Thursday and Friday also found that 35 per cent believe he did well in the negotiations, against 30 per cent who say he did badly.
According to the Survation poll for The Mail on Sunday, 48 per cent of voters want to stay in the EU, with 33 in favour of leaving, and 19 per cent undecided. The first survey conducted since Mr Cameron’s marathon talks in Brussels on Thursday and Friday also found that 35 per cent believe he did well in the negotiations, against 30 per cent who say he did badly.
A curious headline - surely they've declared war on him by rebelling in the first place? I know it's all polite and 'he fought as hard as he could' at the moment, but though justified in sticking to principle, that's still them openly declaring he got a crap deal and is telling us it is good. Is there more in the actual text to support that interpretation in the headline?
I'm spitballing ideas in my head for a thread, and could do with the thoughts of PBers.
Let us imagine Remain win, and wins big, say by 20%, it might not settle it for a generation if the EU don't hold up their end of the bargain.
We could see another referendum within five years?
Or am I talking bollocks?
Not within five years - too tight a timescale for (1) the EU to renege, (2) a government to not just kick up stink but to schedule a new vote and (3) for that vote to happen. Court cases and the like take years to decide. It'd also depend where the U-turn was.
The biggest loophole is that the deal hasn't amended the treaties. I'd expect a government that was faced with the ECJ striking down the agreement as incompatible with the governing treaties (if it does), to first push for a full treaty revision before going nuclear.
According to the Survation poll for The Mail on Sunday, 48 per cent of voters want to stay in the EU, with 33 in favour of leaving, and 19 per cent undecided. The first survey conducted since Mr Cameron’s marathon talks in Brussels on Thursday and Friday also found that 35 per cent believe he did well in the negotiations, against 30 per cent who say he did badly.
According to the Survation poll for The Mail on Sunday, 48 per cent of voters want to stay in the EU, with 33 in favour of leaving, and 19 per cent undecided. The first survey conducted since Mr Cameron’s marathon talks in Brussels on Thursday and Friday also found that 35 per cent believe he did well in the negotiations, against 30 per cent who say he did badly.
First paragraph says 'Cameron ignites fresh civil war...' From which we can confidently conclude that Cameron has NOT ignited any civil war. Any media spouting usually means the opposite. Remarkably the PM has pointed out a home truth. Joining the EEA as an alternative to the EU and remaining in the single market will also entail free movement of workers. I won't waste my breath pointing out Norway again.
It seems more likely that allies in the camps of both sides will make the serious attacks, and then the Senior Tories will be asked if they agree, invited to join in as it were. So Farage will call Cameron an idiotic liar, and IDS will be asked what he thinks about that. Cameron will be asked if IDS is implicitly calling him an idiot liar as well given he agrees the deal is not a good one.
It will be interesting to see how well both try to sidestep the implied attacks without seeming to criticise each other
According to the Survation poll for The Mail on Sunday, 48 per cent of voters want to stay in the EU, with 33 in favour of leaving, and 19 per cent undecided. The first survey conducted since Mr Cameron’s marathon talks in Brussels on Thursday and Friday also found that 35 per cent believe he did well in the negotiations, against 30 per cent who say he did badly.
Leave could still win then if it wins over the 19% who still don't know, the odds favour Remain but even now Remain is still under 50%
Imagine writing that sentence 12 months ago. The SC voters say terrorism is the most important issue, so they're likely to punish the candidate from the dynasty that 'kept America safe' and vote for the billionaire who's never held elected office.
So, what do we think they're promising Boris. Foreign Sec?
Bit harsh on Hammond given he like all those holding the Great Offices of State have sided with Cameron on this one. I assume he's a team player though.
According to the Survation poll for The Mail on Sunday, 48 per cent of voters want to stay in the EU, with 33 in favour of leaving, and 19 per cent undecided. The first survey conducted since Mr Cameron’s marathon talks in Brussels on Thursday and Friday also found that 35 per cent believe he did well in the negotiations, against 30 per cent who say he did badly.
Leave could still win then if it wins over the 19% who still don't know, the odds favour Remain but even now Remain is still under 50%
When has anyone won all the undecided. Split it in half and you get 57-42
Imagine writing that sentence 12 months ago. The SC voters say terrorism is the most important issue, so they're likely to punish the candidate from the dynasty that 'kept America safe' and vote for the billionaire who's never held elected office.
I recall a trilogy of books, the name of which escapes me, which involved a near future fleet of ships getting accidentally sent back in time to WW2 - the present day setting featured in essence a global war against Islamic extremism, and the standard operating procedure of the western powers had become to kill the enemy then sew them up in pigskins to further humiliate them, or something to that effect.
It also featured Prince Harry as a badass veteran SAS commando, meeting his young grandparents. It wasn't very good though.
First paragraph says 'Cameron ignites fresh civil war...' From which we can confidently conclude that Cameron has NOT ignited any civil war. Any media spouting usually means the opposite. Remarkably the PM has pointed out a home truth. Joining the EEA as an alternative to the EU and remaining in the single market will also entail free movement of workers. I won't waste my breath pointing out Norway again.
Yes please don't. You will be wrong again as you were on the last thread.
I thought everyone was saying the party wouldn't be split afterwards. Does Cameron actually want to destroy the Tory party?
Is a silly headline, here's what Cameron has said in the Sunday Times
When reports broke that Michael Gove, one of his closest friends in politics, would back Brexit, Cameron dismissed the news as “not a surprise”. But he now admits he was hurt by the move.
“Obviously I am sad about it because he is a close friend and a very close colleague,” he said, before adding that Gove “will remain both of those things”.
Asked if it might affect their friendship, he said: “I very much hope not.”
Cameron also vowed not to axe ministers who have defied him in his next reshuffle. “My thoughts are nowhere near reshuffles. What I can say is that no one will be at any disadvantage by choosing to campaign in a particular way,” he said.
“I want as many ministers and MPs to support the cause that I think is right but people have thought about these things very carefully and we are all going to respect each other and the choices we make, and no one will suffer disadvantage for a decision to go one way or the other way.”
This is possibly the best-written Out piece I have ever read. It is articles like this and Hannan that make me seriously think twice about how I'm going to vote.
First paragraph says 'Cameron ignites fresh civil war...' From which we can confidently conclude that Cameron has NOT ignited any civil war. Any media spouting usually means the opposite. Remarkably the PM has pointed out a home truth. Joining the EEA as an alternative to the EU and remaining in the single market will also entail free movement of workers. I won't waste my breath pointing out Norway again.
Yes please don't. You will be wrong again as you were on the last thread.
Can you clarify that any alternative allows the restriction of free movement. It is really important
I'm spitballing ideas in my head for a thread, and could do with the thoughts of PBers.
Let us imagine Remain win, and wins big, say by 20%, it might not settle it for a generation if the EU don't hold up their end of the bargain.
We could see another referendum within five years?
Or am I talking bollocks?
OK, let's think it thru.Let's assume the following:
1) Remain wins 2) the FrancoGerman-desired treaty change in 2017/8/whatever does not trigger the 2011 act 3) Cameron remains PM until 2019
Under these circs, no referendum 2 before 2020...but that's election year, so no.
Afterwards? You'd need somebody - Corbyn, Cameron's successor to invent a case for a referendum and get it thru the House. Possible, but you'd need another year, so that takes us up to mid 2021.
So it's *possible* to have a referendum 2 within 5 years, but it'd be tight.
Of course, if any of the assumptions are wrong, results will differ: DYOR
I thought everyone was saying the party wouldn't be split afterwards. Does Cameron actually want to destroy the Tory party?
Is a silly headline, here's what Cameron has said in the Sunday Times
When reports broke that Michael Gove, one of his closest friends in politics, would back Brexit, Cameron dismissed the news as “not a surprise”. But he now admits he was hurt by the move.
“Obviously I am sad about it because he is a close friend and a very close colleague,” he said, before adding that Gove “will remain both of those things”.
Asked if it might affect their friendship, he said: “I very much hope not.”
Cameron also vowed not to axe ministers who have defied him in his next reshuffle. “My thoughts are nowhere near reshuffles. What I can say is that no one will be at any disadvantage by choosing to campaign in a particular way,” he said.
“I want as many ministers and MPs to support the cause that I think is right but people have thought about these things very carefully and we are all going to respect each other and the choices we make, and no one will suffer disadvantage for a decision to go one way or the other way.”
First paragraph says 'Cameron ignites fresh civil war...' From which we can confidently conclude that Cameron has NOT ignited any civil war. Any media spouting usually means the opposite. Remarkably the PM has pointed out a home truth. Joining the EEA as an alternative to the EU and remaining in the single market will also entail free movement of workers. I won't waste my breath pointing out Norway again.
Yes please don't. You will be wrong again as you were on the last thread.
Can you clarify that any alternative allows the restriction of free movement. It is really important
Yes a simple free-trade deal rather than being a part of any 'bloc' would allow the restriction of free movement.
I'm spitballing ideas in my head for a thread, and could do with the thoughts of PBers.
Let us imagine Remain win, and wins big, say by 20%, it might not settle it for a generation if the EU don't hold up their end of the bargain.
We could see another referendum within five years?
Or am I talking bollocks?
Pretty certain it will settle it for 15 years. Ultimately Europe will face some amjor challenges, whether we are in the EU or not. "A generation" maybe not.
It won't settle it for a year if the EU - or the EZ - does something drastic, in the face of mounting crises. Which is quite likely. Schengen collapsed in a matter of months.
Realpolitk will take over, once the democratic politics are out of the way.
We are not in the EZ in the event it collapses. We are not in Schengen in the event it collapses.
Sunday Times front page: Cameron declares war on rebels
I thought everyone was saying the party wouldn't be split afterwards. Does Cameron actually want to destroy the Tory party?
Is a silly headline, here's what Cameron has said in the Sunday Times
When reports broke that Michael Gove, one of his closest friends in politics, would back Brexit, Cameron dismissed the news as “not a surprise”. But he now admits he was hurt by the move.
“Obviously I am sad about it because he is a close friend and a very close colleague,” he said, before adding that Gove “will remain both of those things”.
Asked if it might affect their friendship, he said: “I very much hope not.”
Cameron also vowed not to axe ministers who have defied him in his next reshuffle. “My thoughts are nowhere near reshuffles. What I can say is that no one will be at any disadvantage by choosing to campaign in a particular way,” he said.
“I want as many ministers and MPs to support the cause that I think is right but people have thought about these things very carefully and we are all going to respect each other and the choices we make, and no one will suffer disadvantage for a decision to go one way or the other way.”
As I don't have an insight into or care for the internal politicking of the Tory party, it seems to me to on the face of it reasonable if Cameron were to axe all those who campaign for Out from his Cabinet. I agree with their stance, but it is in effect saying Cameron is wrong about a fundamental issue for the country, even though they are being polite about it. He'd be entitled to sack them in those circumstances.
Now, that might not be a good idea as far as party unity goes, and in fact the opposite was stated to be the plan in the past few weeks - that is, Eurosceptics would be promoted, or at least retained - but I don't see why it would be a betrayal by Cameron either.
IIRC, in Iowa or NH, there was some legal reason given. They had a countdown to the numbers being released, then held back the headline figures until later.
According to the Survation poll for The Mail on Sunday, 48 per cent of voters want to stay in the EU, with 33 in favour of leaving, and 19 per cent undecided. The first survey conducted since Mr Cameron’s marathon talks in Brussels on Thursday and Friday also found that 35 per cent believe he did well in the negotiations, against 30 per cent who say he did badly.
Leave could still win then if it wins over the 19% who still don't know, the odds favour Remain but even now Remain is still under 50%
When has anyone won all the undecided. Split it in half and you get 57-42
Yes but undecideds can sometimes go one way or the other, even if not universally, this poll was taken entirely today after the deal was announced, Cameron has clearly got a bounce from the deal but there is a long way to go yet
I thought everyone was saying the party wouldn't be split afterwards. Does Cameron actually want to destroy the Tory party?
Is a silly headline, here's what Cameron has said in the Sunday Times
When reports broke that Michael Gove, one of his closest friends in politics, would back Brexit, Cameron dismissed the news as “not a surprise”. But he now admits he was hurt by the move.
“Obviously I am sad about it because he is a close friend and a very close colleague,” he said, before adding that Gove “will remain both of those things”.
Asked if it might affect their friendship, he said: “I very much hope not.”
Cameron also vowed not to axe ministers who have defied him in his next reshuffle. “My thoughts are nowhere near reshuffles. What I can say is that no one will be at any disadvantage by choosing to campaign in a particular way,” he said.
“I want as many ministers and MPs to support the cause that I think is right but people have thought about these things very carefully and we are all going to respect each other and the choices we make, and no one will suffer disadvantage for a decision to go one way or the other way.”
Wasn't Osborne saying to ministers "you can campaign to leave or you can have a career"? Someone should ask Cameron if he knew anything about that.
First paragraph says 'Cameron ignites fresh civil war...' From which we can confidently conclude that Cameron has NOT ignited any civil war. Any media spouting usually means the opposite. Remarkably the PM has pointed out a home truth. Joining the EEA as an alternative to the EU and remaining in the single market will also entail free movement of workers. I won't waste my breath pointing out Norway again.
Yes please don't. You will be wrong again as you were on the last thread.
Can you clarify that any alternative allows the restriction of free movement. It is really important
My comment didn't refer to free movement. That is a none issue for me as I have made clear at every stage of this debate. It referred to Flightpath's idiotic comments about Norway on the previous thread.
If Cameron doesn't sack Gove IDS and Grayling it'll show enormous weakness. We saw today the impossibility of their positions. "Are you saying the Prime Minister is being dishonest?" "Don't you believe him when he says this is a good deal for Britain" and it'll only get worse.
Think How Mourinho and Guardiola are destabilising United and City and it gives some idea of the shambles that'll be going on in government
As I don't have an insight into or care for the internal politicking of the Tory party, it seems to me to on the face of it reasonable if Cameron were to axe all those who campaign for Out from his Cabinet. I agree with their stance, but it is in effect saying Cameron is wrong about a fundamental issue for the country, even though they are being polite about it. He'd be entitled to sack them in those circumstances.
Now, that might not be a good idea as far as party unity goes, and in fact the opposite was stated to be the plan in the past few weeks - that is, Eurosceptics would be promoted, or at least retained - but I don't see why it would be a betrayal by Cameron either.
I recall a trilogy of books, the name of which escapes me, which involved a near future fleet of ships getting accidentally sent back in time to WW2 - the present day setting featured in essence a global war against Islamic extremism, and the standard operating procedure of the western powers had become to kill the enemy then sew them up in pigskins to further humiliate them, or something to that effect.
It also featured Prince Harry as a badass veteran SAS commando, meeting his young grandparents. It wasn't very good though.
Shades of "The Final Countdown" where the US carrier "Nimitz" goes back in time to just before Pearl Harbor.
Comments
Let us imagine Remain win, and wins big, say by 20%, it might not settle it for a generation if the EU don't hold up their end of the bargain.
We could see another referendum within five years?
Or am I talking bollocks?
Conor Burns MP declares for #Brexit. Conor was Margaret Thatcher's very close friend. #VoteLeave https://twitter.com/conorburns_mp/status/700974684595163136 …
REMAIN = Traitor Pig-Dogs!
Cameron declares war on rebels
https://twitter.com/suttonnick/status/701166029322457088/photo/1
That is where the FO will try to take us next, if they win. Rely on it
Cant see Trump not winning SC.
https://twitter.com/benrileysmith/status/701166442515972096
https://twitter.com/benrileysmith/status/701167068171923456
The biggest loophole is that the deal hasn't amended the treaties. I'd expect a government that was faced with the ECJ striking down the agreement as incompatible with the governing treaties (if it does), to first push for a full treaty revision before going nuclear.
That would require a major economic meltdown and migration crisis on top, probably.
I'd say within 10 years, not 5 years. I certainly don't think you could call "a generation".
LEAVE = The Rebels
then:
REMAIN = The Galactic Empire
From which we can confidently conclude that Cameron has NOT ignited any civil war. Any media spouting usually means the opposite.
Remarkably the PM has pointed out a home truth. Joining the EEA as an alternative to the EU and remaining in the single market will also entail free movement of workers.
I won't waste my breath pointing out Norway again.
I think Dave will say, offer or do virtually anything to stop him declaring for Leave.
It will be interesting to see how well both try to sidestep the implied attacks without seeming to criticise each other
How on earth can you call the next hundred years?
https://mobile.twitter.com/CBSPolitics/status/701165931800748033
Remain = Remainders
http://edition.cnn.com/2016/02/20/politics/south-carolina-nevada-live-updates/index.html
I underestimated @LouiseMensch. She really has put her beliefs before loyalty to Cameron. I apologise to her https://twitter.com/LouiseMensch/status/701168376576614400 …
Louise Mensch ✔ @LouiseMensch
"Hey @david_cameron your bullshit "deal" is only temporary" says @JunckerEU helpfully (after one day) #Brexit https://twitter.com/Mina_Andreeva/status/700821002679357440 …
Louise Mensch ✔ @LouiseMensch
Hashtag #Refugees Hashtag #UKinEU no thanks to rapist males of fighting age bussed in from safe Turkey #Brexit https://twitter.com/EP_President/status/700365620391624705 …
Currently 52.2 - 47.7 ahead with 67.4% in
Most of the remaining from Clark county so would expect the gap to widen at the end.
http://edition.cnn.com/election/primaries/states/nv/Dem
Plus it keeps Boris out of the country a lot making leadership plotting much more difficult.
Plus it would be a bit hilarious having Boris as our representative to the world.
The latter meaning, presumably, cybernetics doing everything? (which might lead to the extinction?)
It also featured Prince Harry as a badass veteran SAS commando, meeting his young grandparents. It wasn't very good though.
When reports broke that Michael Gove, one of his closest friends in politics, would back Brexit, Cameron dismissed the news as “not a surprise”. But he now admits he was hurt by the move.
“Obviously I am sad about it because he is a close friend and a very close colleague,” he said, before adding that Gove “will remain both of those things”.
Asked if it might affect their friendship, he said: “I very much hope not.”
Cameron also vowed not to axe ministers who have defied him in his next reshuffle. “My thoughts are nowhere near reshuffles. What I can say is that no one will be at any disadvantage by choosing to campaign in a particular way,” he said.
“I want as many ministers and MPs to support the cause that I think is right but people have thought about these things very carefully and we are all going to respect each other and the choices we make, and no one will suffer disadvantage for a decision to go one way or the other way.”
This is possibly the best-written Out piece I have ever read. It is articles like this and Hannan that make me seriously think twice about how I'm going to vote.
Now, would he do it by accident is a fair(er) question, even if one thinks the answer is a resounding no.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/live-south-carolina-gop-primary-exit-poll-analysis/story?id=37077219
Survation phone poll for MoS carried out today
REMAIN 48%
LEAVE 33%
DK 19%
1) Remain wins
2) the FrancoGerman-desired treaty change in 2017/8/whatever does not trigger the 2011 act
3) Cameron remains PM until 2019
Under these circs, no referendum 2 before 2020...but that's election year, so no.
Afterwards? You'd need somebody - Corbyn, Cameron's successor to invent a case for a referendum and get it thru the House. Possible, but you'd need another year, so that takes us up to mid 2021.
So it's *possible* to have a referendum 2 within 5 years, but it'd be tight.
Of course, if any of the assumptions are wrong, results will differ: DYOR
In da panic, dey tryta pull da plug.
Now, that might not be a good idea as far as party unity goes, and in fact the opposite was stated to be the plan in the past few weeks - that is, Eurosceptics would be promoted, or at least retained - but I don't see why it would be a betrayal by Cameron either.
35% of those polled by Survation for today's MoS #EYRef phone survey say they think Cameron did well. 30% say badly
Maybe the same. Maybe not. Dunno.
Think How Mourinho and Guardiola are destabilising United and City and it gives some idea of the shambles that'll be going on in government