politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The Great 2014 Euro Elections Polling Race
There next few hours will be quite a nervous time for the pollsters because not too long after 10pm their final surveys will be able to be compared with the actual results.
Hmm. I thought my comment had gone through, but a few minutes later it's still missing..
Anyway, I want UKIP to win, as this would give me a chance of winning the Ladbrokes competition.
FPT: Mr. Briskin, if Ricciardo had passed Hamilton this would've extended Rosberg's advantage, and I want Rosberg to take the title (backed him at 16/1 and 24/1).
Which is also why if UKIP finish well people would be wrong to call to ignore the pollsters underrating them for future GE polling. GEs having a much higher turnout rate than Euros will work for ICM and YouGov's methodology better.
Greens finish FIRST in Norwich City Council. 219 votes ahead of Labour.
I tipped the Greens to win Norwich South at 25/1 a couple of weeks ago, to widespread polite scepticism. You can still get them at that price with Paddy Power. It's a bargain.
Greens finish FIRST in Norwich City Council. 219 votes ahead of Labour.
I tipped the Greens to win Norwich South at 25/1 a couple of weeks ago, to widespread polite scepticism. You can still get them at that price with Paddy Power. It's a bargain.
I dont think there is any chance of a Green win in Norwich South in 2015. Losing the strong candidate from 2005 / 2010 hasnt helped but the inevitable increase in Labour votes simply makes the winning post too high. Elbowing the Lib Dems aside will be good enough.
That analysis runs counter to the fairy stories we are regularly peddled here at PB about the LD incumbency effect.
I think you'll find punters weren't voting on their LibDem MP's incumbency in the local/euro elections. That comes near year.
Apart from that gaping whole in your thinking that was a searing analysis.
But it was not my analysis Jack, it was John Curtice's analysis today:
- "on average Liberal Democrat support was down just as much – that is, by no less than 13 points – in Liberal Democrat MPs’ constituencies as elsewhere. In short, there was little consistent sign of the ability of Liberal Democrats’ personal popularity to stem the receding tide"
Curtice is usually a respected voice here at PB. Strange that you become so dismissive of him when he says something you do not agree with.
I'll allow you the benefit of the doubt and assume that your original comment wasn't about LibDem MP''s and their "fairy story" incumbency, which of course wasn't what Prof Curtice was referring too.
I have a very high regard for the esteemed Prof and very largely agree with him on most issues.
For the avoidance of any doubt Jack, here are John Curtice's exact words today:
... it was difficult to find a silver lining to the cloud hanging over the Liberal Democrats. Once the local elections were the party’s forte; now they have become an annual embarrassment.
The party argued – not for the first time – that it was often performing better in places where it already has a sitting MP and thus has a strong base of local support. Indeed, there was the occasional bright spot – the party actually did better than in the 2010 general election in Bradford East and Birmingham Yardley. But there were plenty of disappointments too, not least the fact that the party came second to the Conservatives in Vince Cable’s Twickenham constituency and lost control of Ed Davey’s Kingston backyard.
Consequently, on average Liberal Democrat support was down just as much – that is, by no less than 13 points – in Liberal Democrat MPs’ constituencies as elsewhere. In short, there was little consistent sign of the ability of Liberal Democrats’ personal popularity to stem the receding tide. And next year their own seats will be on the line.
According to Sunday Politics Wales turnout here in Wales was 32% increase of 1.5% on 2009 with the lowest turnout 27% in Merthyr aand highest 38% on Anglesey
Informed people are telling me that this could be a big night for Labour. It is on a knife-edge.
It can hardly be a very big night for Labour if it is on a knife edge - look how well the tories did when they were in opposition. If it's close it's no ringing endorsement of anyone.
Suzanne Evans @SuzanneEvans1 3m EU count well underway in Merton. Interesting only @ukip and @MertonLibDems counting agents here. Others as complacent as usual?
remind me someone, did the Lib Dems outperform on vote share in the locals compared to national polling? And what about UKIP? Actual local election vote share above or below national polling? And how did either do compared to last year?
remind me someone, did the Lib Dems outperform on vote share in the locals compared to national polling? And what about UKIP? Actual local election vote share above or below national polling? And how did either do compared to last year?
Labour was 2000 votes ahead of the Greens in Norwich this year- though a handful behind in Norwich South. In 2009 the Greens had a big lead there - but still came a poor 4th in 2010. I expect them to do no better in 2015.
On the Sunday Politics NE section today, Ian Mearns was talking up Labour's chances of winning 2 seats. The Conservative guest (soz, forgotten her name - PPC for Berwick) put Martin Callanan's chances of keeping his seat at 7 or 8 out of 10. The presenter literally laughed at the idea of the Lib Dems retaining their seat!
If we fall one vote short of a second seat, I'll be kicking myself!
Are there any indications of a differential turnout between locals and non-locals areas. Intuitively one assumes there are but does anyone have a view as to extent?
My impression is that turnout in the East Midlands in non-local areas was around 30%, i.e. a bit below the 38% for areas that also had locals. But that's second-hand info, don't rely on it.
remind me someone, did the Lib Dems outperform on vote share in the locals compared to national polling? And what about UKIP? Actual local election vote share above or below national polling? And how did either do compared to last year?
Re: polling LDs look to have had a good day, upper end of MoE for their national numbers. UKIP's numbers vary by pollster. YouGov look too low, Survation, ComRes within MoE.
remind me someone, did the Lib Dems outperform on vote share in the locals compared to national polling? And what about UKIP? Actual local election vote share above or below national polling? And how did either do compared to last year?
Re: polling LDs look to have had a good day, upper end of MoE for their national numbers. UKIP's numbers vary by pollster. YouGov look too low, Survation, ComRes within MoE.
My impression is that turnout in the East Midlands in non-local areas was around 30%, i.e. a bit below the 38% for areas that also had locals. But that's second-hand info, don't rely on it.
Thanks- that's less of a differential than I had imagined but a differential nonetheless. The turnout for local elections, which do matter (or at least matter much more than European elections) is atrocious isn't it.
Informed people are telling me that this could be a big night for Labour. It is on a knife-edge.
What is on a knife edge and what do you mean by "a big night"? Bear in mind that every opposition since 1984 has won the European elections, so Labour finishing top is no great shakes; indeed, it would be absolutely normal.
Turnout around here was a bit below 30% at the polling stations, add on postal votes and I would guess about 38% over all, and that is an area without locals. I also think that UKIP have taken about 33% of the vote in this area, maybe more.
#RUMOUR: Yorkshire and North-Lincs count says Greens rumoured to have overtaken Lib Dems as fourth largest party.
Not a surprise. Greens did tremendously well in Manchester for example.
Surprises me. I thought the Greens were a SE England party.
Nope. They do quite well in Scotland for example. And this year they seem to have benefited from disgruntled Lib Dems in several bits of northern England.
That analysis runs counter to the fairy stories we are regularly peddled here at PB about the LD incumbency effect.
I think you'll find punters weren't voting on their LibDem MP's incumbency in the local/euro elections. That comes near year.
Apart from that gaping whole in your thinking that was a searing analysis.
But it was not my analysis Jack, it was John Curtice's analysis today:
Curtice is usually a respected voice here at PB. Strange that you become so dismissive of him when he says something you do not agree with.
For the avoidance of any doubt Jack, here are John Curtice's exact words today:
... it was difficult to find a silver lining to the cloud hanging over the Liberal Democrats. Once the local elections were the party’s forte; now they have become an annual embarrassment.
The party argued – not for the first time – that it was often performing better in places where it already has a sitting MP and thus has a strong base of local support. Indeed, there was the occasional bright spot – the party actually did better than in the 2010 general election in Bradford East and Birmingham Yardley. But there were plenty of disappointments too, not least the fact that the party came second to the Conservatives in Vince Cable’s Twickenham constituency and lost control of Ed Davey’s Kingston backyard.
Consequently, on average Liberal Democrat support was down just as much – that is, by no less than 13 points – in Liberal Democrat MPs’ constituencies as elsewhere. In short, there was little consistent sign of the ability of Liberal Democrats’ personal popularity to stem the receding tide. And next year their own seats will be on the line.
It appears you are being more than just aimlessly stupid today.
Your first post on this matter made the clear implication that LibDem MP's would not enjoy any "fairy story incumbency" as noted often on PB and that Prof Curtice supported this view.
He did not and how could he as it is axiomatic that none of the elections related to constituency MP's. What Prof Curtice did note was that in many council seats there was little or no difference between those with LibDem MP's or not and that next year would see if actual LibDem MP stickability was in play or not.
... it is the junior coalition partners Labour who are clearly bearing the brunt of the backlash for years of punishing cutbacks, with candidates losing seats nationwide.
High profile casualties in the Labour drubbing include Lord Mayor of Dublin Oisin Quinn and Lord Mayor of Cork Catherine Clancy.
That analysis runs counter to the fairy stories we are regularly peddled here at PB about the LD incumbency effect.
But it was not my analysis Jack, it was John Curtice's analysis today:
Curtice is usually a respected voice here at PB. Strange that you become so dismissive of him when he says something you do not agree with.
For the avoidance of any doubt, here are John Curtice's exact words today:
... it was difficult to find a silver lining to the cloud hanging over the Liberal Democrats. Once the local elections were the party’s forte; now they have become an annual embarrassment.
The party argued – not for the first time – that it was often performing better in places where it already has a sitting MP and thus has a strong base of local support. Indeed, there was the occasional bright spot – the party actually did better than in the 2010 general election in Bradford East and Birmingham Yardley. But there were plenty of disappointments too, not least the fact that the party came second to the Conservatives in Vince Cable’s Twickenham constituency and lost control of Ed Davey’s Kingston backyard.
Consequently, on average Liberal Democrat support was down just as much – that is, by no less than 13 points – in Liberal Democrat MPs’ constituencies as elsewhere. In short, there was little consistent sign of the ability of Liberal Democrats’ personal popularity to stem the receding tide. And next year their own seats will be on the line.
It appears you are being more than just aimlessly stupid today.
Your first post on this matter made the clear implication that LibDem MP's would not enjoy any "fairy story incumbency" as noted often on PB and that Prof Curtice supported this view.
He did not and how could he as it is axiomatic that none of the elections related to constituency MP's. What Prof Curtice did note was that in many council seats there was little or no difference between those with LibDem MP's or not and that next year would see if actual LibDem MP stickability was in play or not.
I agree.
John Curtice: - "Consequently, on average Liberal Democrat support was down just as much – that is, by no less than 13 points – in Liberal Democrat MPs’ constituencies as elsewhere. In short, there was little consistent sign of the ability of Liberal Democrats’ personal popularity to stem the receding tide. And next year their own seats will be on the line."
Looks crystal clear to me Jack. You must be reading a different article.
Turnout around here was a bit below 30% at the polling stations, add on postal votes and I would guess about 38% over all, and that is an area without locals. I also think that UKIP have taken about 33% of the vote in this area, maybe more.
FPT Carnyx - this for the reco on Caorunn gin - as my favourite at the mo is another Scottish gin, Hendricks, I shall look this one out! As it's Thai owners are doing great things with Old Poultney I have high expectations!
Turnout around here was a bit below 30% at the polling stations, add on postal votes and I would guess about 38% over all, and that is an area without locals. I also think that UKIP have taken about 33% of the vote in this area, maybe more.
Thomas the cat has just discovered Herself's newly planted and hidden emergency reserve catmint plant and he has levered off the wire net covering it. In a few minutes he will stoned out of his tiny feline mind, she will find out, there will be hell to pay and, of course, it will all be my fault. Off to do the ironing so that I can claim both innocence and ignorance.
UKIP - 29% Conservative - 24% Labour - 21% LibDem - 8% Other - 18%
If that is the case I will be a very happy man and Red Ed maybe out of a job, but I rather doubt it. If Labour does come third (and I rate the chances of that at no more than 9/1) it will only be by a fraction of a per cent.
I saw verifications on Thursday night at the count in Sutton and all I can say is UKIPmay be on for a much better night than anyone expects by quite a distance..
I think we're all underestimating the other others. Last time around the English Democrats got almost 2%, Christian Voice got over 1% as did the Socialist Labour party and a couple of others (if memory serves). My guess is:
Evening all, popcorn and appletise at the ready in preparation for a night of "excitement". Will be interesting to see which pollsters have overegged the pudding. Can UKIP really rise from 17% NEV to around 30% in the Euros when the turnout in those parts of the country without locals on Thursday is likely to be lower and was in Scotland, Wales and rural areas where UKIP tends to be less attractive.
Good to see that the Hibbies would rather have some derby games next season than play in the top flight. Hearts, Rangers and Hibs - should be the better division!
Evening all, popcorn and appletise at the ready in preparation for a night of "excitement". Will be interesting to see which pollsters have overegged the pudding. Can UKIP really rise from 17% NEV to around 30% in the Euros when the turnout in those parts of the country without locals on Thursday is likely to be lower and was in Scotland, Wales and rural areas where UKIP tends to be less attractive.
CDU 35.9 SPD 27.2 Greens 10.8 Linke 7.5 AfD 6.8 FDP 3.1
there's no threshold anymore...so everybody will get seats..even parties at 1% as they use a big single constituency
When did they abolish the threshold? Very surprising as arguably the lack of a threshold was the Weimar electoral system's biggest fault. Does that apply to Bundestag elections as well?
Comments
Anyway, I want UKIP to win, as this would give me a chance of winning the Ladbrokes competition.
FPT: Mr. Briskin, if Ricciardo had passed Hamilton this would've extended Rosberg's advantage, and I want Rosberg to take the title (backed him at 16/1 and 24/1).
Here's my post-race analysis of the Monaco Grand Prix: http://enormo-haddock.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/monaco-post-race-analysis.html
Edited extra bit: if you back Mercedes to win the Constructors with Ladbrokes, £50 gets you a potential 17 pence profit.
For the avoidance of doubt, this is *not* a tip.
Which is also why if UKIP finish well people would be wrong to call to ignore the pollsters underrating them for future GE polling. GEs having a much higher turnout rate than Euros will work for ICM and YouGov's methodology better.
Will it just be one declaration for each region? Or will we get results for smaller areas as they become available?
People's Party 27,1(5 seats)
Social Democratcs 23,8 (5)
FPÖ 20,1 (4)
Greens 14,6 (3)
NEOS 8,3 (1)
turnout 45.5%
It would be +2 for FPO, + 1 for Greens and -1 for People's Party
I have a horrible feeling Labour will come third.
Result expected after midnight
I had UKIP higher, but can't recall the exact numbers, and the parties in the same order.
EU count well underway in Merton. Interesting only @ukip and @MertonLibDems counting agents here. Others as complacent as usual?
UKIP 1.33
Lab 3.35
Con 50
Betfair In-Play - Euros - Most Seats (121 026 pounds matched)
UKIP 1.28
Lab 3.1
Con 60
So far, 539 of the 949 seats have been filled. Fianna Fáil has won 127, followed by Sinn Féin on 104.
Both government parties are behind in the polls at present. Fine Gael has 100 seats and Labour 29.
Independents and others have won 128. The turnout nationally was 50.8%. Counting for the European Parliament began on Sunday morning.
Voters also went to the polls to elect two new TDs (Irish MPs) following the death of one and the resignation of another.
Fine Gael's Gabrielle McFadden won the seat in the Longford Westmeath by-election.
It was formerly held by her sister - the late Fine Gael TD Nicky McFadden - she died in March from Motor Neurone Disease.
The Dublin West by-election was won by Socialist Party candidate Ruth Coppinger - she replaced Independent Patrick McNulty.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-27564333
2013 locals: LD 13.9%, UKIP 19.9%
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0At91c3wX1Wu5dGZMVENacEVqMUI0bWZaQk13c041S3c&usp=sheets_web#gid=0
http://www7.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2013/06/29/final-vote-tally-from-last-months-locals-shows-ukip-in-second-place-in-seats-contested/
Labour was 2000 votes ahead of the Greens in Norwich this year- though a handful behind in Norwich South. In 2009 the Greens had a big lead there - but still came a poor 4th in 2010.
I expect them to do no better in 2015.
If we fall one vote short of a second seat, I'll be kicking myself!
#RUMOUR: Yorkshire and North-Lincs count says Greens rumoured to have overtaken Lib Dems as fourth largest party.
LDs look to have had a good day, upper end of MoE for their national numbers. UKIP's numbers vary by pollster. YouGov look too low, Survation, ComRes within MoE.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_next_United_Kingdom_general_election#2014
I put the last month of polling on these euros into a graph.
It appears you are being more than just aimlessly stupid today.
Your first post on this matter made the clear implication that LibDem MP's would not enjoy any "fairy story incumbency" as noted often on PB and that Prof Curtice supported this view.
He did not and how could he as it is axiomatic that none of the elections related to constituency MP's. What Prof Curtice did note was that in many council seats there was little or no difference between those with LibDem MP's or not and that next year would see if actual LibDem MP stickability was in play or not.
I agree.
I used to go to Wentworth to watch the Picadilly World Match Play many many years ago.
A touch of schadenfreude - it's headed for 90 here today, so seeing them all bundled up at Wentworth brings back some chilly memories :-)
... it is the junior coalition partners Labour who are clearly bearing the brunt of the backlash for years of punishing cutbacks, with candidates losing seats nationwide.
High profile casualties in the Labour drubbing include Lord Mayor of Dublin Oisin Quinn and Lord Mayor of Cork Catherine Clancy.
http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/elections/sinn-fein-on-course-to-triple-seats-30303213.html
A warning there for the Lib Dems there: junior coalition partners are usually the ones who get squished, not the main coalition party.
http://www.chelmsford.gov.uk/european-elections
Your first post on this matter made the clear implication that LibDem MP's would not enjoy any "fairy story incumbency" as noted often on PB and that Prof Curtice supported this view.
He did not and how could he as it is axiomatic that none of the elections related to constituency MP's. What Prof Curtice did note was that in many council seats there was little or no difference between those with LibDem MP's or not and that next year would see if actual LibDem MP stickability was in play or not.
I agree.
John Curtice: - "Consequently, on average Liberal Democrat support was down just as much – that is, by no less than 13 points – in Liberal Democrat MPs’ constituencies as elsewhere. In short, there was little consistent sign of the ability of Liberal Democrats’ personal popularity to stem the receding tide. And next year their own seats will be on the line."
Looks crystal clear to me Jack. You must be reading a different article.
twitter.com/SuzanneEvans1/status/470594865034952704
In case anyone is interested.
It is crystal clear.
I agree with Prof Curtice.
You agree with something Prof Curtice didn't say.
http://brandirectory.com/league_tables/table/top-50-football-club-brands-2014
P.S. Nice new avatar, by the way.
UKIP - 29%
Conservative - 24%
Labour - 21%
LibDem - 8%
Other - 18%
I think he would marginally prefer Lab to UKIP - to avoid a UKIP publicity spike which would put Newark at risk.
Obviously he won't want Lab to be too far ahead but something like Lab 27, UKIP 26, Con 23 would be OK.
UKIP 31%
Labour 29%
Tory. 24%
Greens 7%
Other. 9%
HillmanMinx Joined December 2013 Visits 30
Points -12 Posts 25
Reactions 0 Off Topic 0 Spam 12
I meant Lib Dems on 7%, Greens and others on 9%
ÖVP 27.4%
SPÖ 23.8%
FPÖ 19.5%
Greens 15.1%
NEOS 7.9%
CDU 35.9
SPD 27.2
Greens 10.8
Linke 7.5
AfD 6.8
FDP 3.1
there's no threshold anymore...so everybody will get seats..even parties at 1% as they use a big single constituency
UKIP 26
Lab 24
Con 21
Green 8
LD 7
Others 14
http://www.gwydir.demon.co.uk/uklocalgov/makeup.htm
UKIP 27
Labour 25
Con 23
Green 10
Lib Dem 8
LD 8,863
Lab 6,822
UKIP 4,142
Con 4,103
Green 950
Changes since 2010 locals:
LD -3.39%
Lab +1.63%
UKIP +16.16%
Con -14.00%
Green -3.35%
16% is a very low share for the Tories in a seat they currently hold at Westminster.