Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

What Americans are expecting the election result to be and when – politicalbetting.com

123457

Comments

  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,190
    Scott_xP said:

    @adamboultonTABB

    IMHO on balance 🇺🇸 electorate is more sexist than it is racist . Remarkable if
    @KamalaHarris overcomes both.

    Does Boulton have a serious point bearing in mind if Harris wins, women win it for her, or is he wishcasting?
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,247
    edited November 5
    Nigelb said:

    We have Florida election day vote breakdown by party affiliation now available
    👉 https://projects.votehub.com/pages/early-voting-tracker

    Republicans voting more than Dems in Florida on the day and early and on early votes more than Dems in North Carolina.

    Dems voting more than Republicans in Pennsylvania, at least on early votes on those charts
    https://projects.votehub.com/pages/early-voting-tracker
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 18,080

    KnightOut said:

    I'd say it's fairly common thinking amongst educated here that having fewer/no children is absolutely fine and would do a great service to the planet, so its not really a problem.

    This ignores the very serious social, political and economic consequences if it continues unchecked - which could ultimately lead to states falling apart into (and not excluding at the extremes) bankruptcy, disorder and anarchy.

    What you probably want is some sort of long-term population stabilisation.

    Yes, I'm quite concerned about the prospect of rapid population falls.

    I suspect that culturally and economically it's quite hard to hit on close to replacement level. There are feedbacks which will push away from stability.

    The idea of a world with a global fertility rate below 1.5 is quite depressing.
    It is so depressing. Children are the most incredible gift and the source of almost all joy in the world. There is an upside for the natural world from a lower human population, but it's hard to see a rapidly falling population as anything other than a tragedy.
    It really does depend on exactly *who* is having/raising the children. Or failing to have them.This is the uncomfortable truth.

    Our society has arguably been hyper-reproductive in the 'wrong' areas, and pretty barren amongst those whose offspring would, on balance, have the potential to make a more positive impact.

    I know this is a generalisation and I'd never argue for any forceful intervention of any kind, but it is the reality, however unpalatable.

    Genetics, background, culture, geography, money, time, intellect, consciousness, politics - all stuff that can make a difference.

    This is why it pisses me off when politicians say 'talent is evenly distributed but opportunity isn't '. What evidence is the first assertion based on? Has there been some big Trading Places-style experiment that we weren't told about.
    Getting a ‘high status male’ vibe..
    Let's reminisce about the times when the Right used to attack the Left for past eugenics support.

    The critical re-evaluation from Spiked can't be far away, surely?
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 42,205

    Andy_JS said:

    Haven't been on ChatGPT for about a year, so I thought I'd see if they've improved their factual information replies.

    They haven't.

    My question: "How many votes did the Conservatives poll in the Huntingdon constituency at the 1983 general election?"

    Answer: "In the 1983 UK general election, the Conservative Party candidate in the Huntingdon constituency, John Major, received 32,833 votes, winning with 54.2% of the vote. This was a strong performance in a safe Conservative seat, marking the beginning of a prominent political career for Major, who would later become Prime Minister."

    In fact he polled 34,254 votes at that election.

    Accuracy is for low status people.

    Quickly generating, big, thick documents is much more important.
    GPT: garbage produced textually
    The annoying thing is that LLM's such as Chat GPT et al *do* have lots of good uses. Used well, they can be invaluable in narrow areas.

    But the problems are that people use them poorly, and often in areas outside those narrow areas. Because they're trendy. And also because there's a heck of a lot of money being invested in the area, and the hype train is running as people want their money back.

    As ever, be cautious about hype. Sometimes hype is justified; most of the time... it isn't.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 22,599
    Nigelb said:

    This is the real Deep State that's being voted on.

    Neither candidate wants to talk about it, but the stakes today for the Supreme Court’s future are huge. A GOP win could cement this majority for another generation or two. A Dem win could protect theirs or shrink this majority. Divided gov’t means a R Senate could stymie Harris.
    https://x.com/sahilkapur/status/1853791927738536132

    Imagine a 6/3 - or possibly 7/2 - court, to the right of the current one.
    For the next couple of decades.

    At best, President Harris might make it 5/4 to the liberals - but with a likely GOP Senate doing the confirming,

    Would the Supreme Court possibly rule a future Supreme Court expansion illegal?
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 10,696

    theProle said:

    Phil said:

    Farage: "This is the sexy bit: Elon comes in and takes a knife to the [US] deep state. Just like when he bought Twitter he sacked 80 per cent of the staff.

    There are going to be mass lay-offs, whole departments closing and I’m hoping and praying that’s the blueprint for what we then do on our side of the pond.

    Because that’s what Reform UK believes in - that we’re over-bureaucratised and none of it works. This assault on the bureaucratic state is the thing that’s really exciting."

    Really? That's what Reform voters want? 80% of the state slashed and burned.

    The Red Wallers he's after???

    I very much doubt it.

    This is all very fascist obviously, but it’s also notable (to me) that Farage completely glosses over the reality that Musk sacked 80% of Twitter’s staff & as a result triggered an 84% drop in it’s revenue. He simply didn’t understand the product Twitter was selling.

    The idea that you can simply hack away 80% of government employees & not end up causing great swathes of harm to people in the real world is for the birds.
    I'm not sure that one followed from the other with Twitter. The drop in advertising revenue has more to do with his brand positioning than the reduction in headcount.

    It's worth remembering that before Musk bought it, Twitter was mostly making thumping losses, and it's business model looked pretty unsustainable. The jury is still out of Musk's version, but I think it's by no means impossible he'll end up making it wash it's face.
    Twitter had started making profit a few years before Musk took over. It took time to get there, but was looking sustainable.

    Then Musk took over.
    This isn't really true. It made money in only 2 years its entire existence before dropping again to unprofitability, and it was really just accounting trickery. It doubled its head count during COVID, which was ridiculous.

    Now, under Musk ownership, a fair criticism is, is the company being improved?

    The underlying problem Twitter has always had, it doesn't know its users, which makes advertising value on the platform far less attractive than Facebook. The genius of Meta is they know so much about every user on all its platforms and has tech to find out more / monetarise this. Twitter has very poor tech behind the scenes and has had limited product development way before Musk.
    https://www.businessofapps.com/data/twitter-statistics/ has numbers. You can see the revenue is healthy, until Musk took over. Profits were good in 2018 and 2019, but losses were bad in 2020. 2021 was then only a small loss.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,247
    edited November 5

    Farage: "This is the sexy bit: Elon comes in and takes a knife to the [US] deep state. Just like when he bought Twitter he sacked 80 per cent of the staff.

    There are going to be mass lay-offs, whole departments closing and I’m hoping and praying that’s the blueprint for what we then do on our side of the pond.

    Because that’s what Reform UK believes in - that we’re over-bureaucratised and none of it works. This assault on the bureaucratic state is the thing that’s really exciting."

    Really? That's what Reform voters want? 80% of the state slashed and burned.

    The Red Wallers he's after???

    I very much doubt it.

    Most Reform voters are either small businessmen, in the armed forces or white working class private sector workers. So I doubt they are that bothered about Farage promising to slash the civil service and public sector administrators as long as he doesn't also slash the numbers of police, soldiers and doctors and nurses
  • Pro_RataPro_Rata Posts: 5,255

    Nigelb said:

    Nigelb said:

    So what is the playlist tonight as we wait for results? I'll start off with Steely Dan - Haitian Divorce.

    Sorry, Donald, they have fallen out of love....

    Kamala Chameleon
    Then one for the pollsters: Springsteen - "The Ties that Bind"....
    Streets of Philadelphia, surely ?

    Where they'll be Dancin' in the Street.
    Green Day's American Idiot if it's Trump.
    The Lights Went out in Georgia
    If Harris wins, I Predict a Riot (in reality and the Kaiser Chiefs).
    Great song!
    According to Google maps there are Leodynisians in AL, ME, ND, UT, MA and NY but none in any swing states.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 81,440
    edited November 5

    theProle said:

    Phil said:

    Farage: "This is the sexy bit: Elon comes in and takes a knife to the [US] deep state. Just like when he bought Twitter he sacked 80 per cent of the staff.

    There are going to be mass lay-offs, whole departments closing and I’m hoping and praying that’s the blueprint for what we then do on our side of the pond.

    Because that’s what Reform UK believes in - that we’re over-bureaucratised and none of it works. This assault on the bureaucratic state is the thing that’s really exciting."

    Really? That's what Reform voters want? 80% of the state slashed and burned.

    The Red Wallers he's after???

    I very much doubt it.

    This is all very fascist obviously, but it’s also notable (to me) that Farage completely glosses over the reality that Musk sacked 80% of Twitter’s staff & as a result triggered an 84% drop in it’s revenue. He simply didn’t understand the product Twitter was selling.

    The idea that you can simply hack away 80% of government employees & not end up causing great swathes of harm to people in the real world is for the birds.
    I'm not sure that one followed from the other with Twitter. The drop in advertising revenue has more to do with his brand positioning than the reduction in headcount.

    It's worth remembering that before Musk bought it, Twitter was mostly making thumping losses, and it's business model looked pretty unsustainable. The jury is still out of Musk's version, but I think it's by no means impossible he'll end up making it wash it's face.
    Twitter had started making profit a few years before Musk took over. It took time to get there, but was looking sustainable.

    Then Musk took over.
    This isn't really true. It made money in only 2 years its entire existence before dropping again to unprofitability, and it was really just accounting trickery. It doubled its head count during COVID, which was ridiculous.

    Now, under Musk ownership, a fair criticism is, is the company being improved?

    The underlying problem Twitter has always had, it doesn't know its users, which makes advertising value on the platform far less attractive than Facebook. The genius of Meta is they know so much about every user on all its platforms and has tech to find out more / monetarise this. Twitter has very poor tech behind the scenes and has had limited product development way before Musk.
    https://www.businessofapps.com/data/twitter-statistics/ has numbers. You can see the revenue is healthy, until Musk took over. Profits were good in 2018 and 2019, but losses were bad in 2020. 2021 was then only a small loss.
    As I say, the 2 years of profit were accountancy trickery. Also remember 2020 / 21, loads of companies that were based upon online advertising did extremely well, because we were all stuck in our homes, everybody wanted to sell us shit while we doom scrolled. Since then all tech companies took a hit in 22 / 23, cut lots of staff and now starting to turn it around with the likes of LLMs.

    All tech companies massively over hired during COVID and had to cut back.

    Musk paid far too much for twitter, then a valid criticism is he overdid the cuts and also his behaviour has scared off advertisers. But the fundamentals of twitter haven't changed, very poor tech on the backend (lots of people Musk called in looked at the code and went WTF, this is a shit show, total rewrite required, and Musk said no can't do it) and no idea who their users are.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 77,878

    Nigelb said:

    This is the real Deep State that's being voted on.

    Neither candidate wants to talk about it, but the stakes today for the Supreme Court’s future are huge. A GOP win could cement this majority for another generation or two. A Dem win could protect theirs or shrink this majority. Divided gov’t means a R Senate could stymie Harris.
    https://x.com/sahilkapur/status/1853791927738536132

    Imagine a 6/3 - or possibly 7/2 - court, to the right of the current one.
    For the next couple of decades.

    At best, President Harris might make it 5/4 to the liberals - but with a likely GOP Senate doing the confirming,

    Would the Supreme Court possibly rule a future Supreme Court expansion illegal?
    First they'd need to decide whether or not they had jurisdiction on the matter. They might decide they don't ;)
  • DruttDrutt Posts: 1,121
    MASSIVE SAMPLE ALERT

    Dixville Notch, NH has declared Harris 3, Trump 3.
    It was 5-0 Biden and 4-2 Hilary.
  • maaarshmaaarsh Posts: 3,573
    Nigelb said:

    We have Florida election day vote breakdown by party affiliation now available
    👉 https://projects.votehub.com/pages/early-voting-tracker

    Data updates appear to be way behind this -

    https://joeisdone.github.io/florida/
  • PhilPhil Posts: 2,239

    Andy_JS said:

    Haven't been on ChatGPT for about a year, so I thought I'd see if they've improved their factual information replies.

    They haven't.

    My question: "How many votes did the Conservatives poll in the Huntingdon constituency at the 1983 general election?"

    Answer: "In the 1983 UK general election, the Conservative Party candidate in the Huntingdon constituency, John Major, received 32,833 votes, winning with 54.2% of the vote. This was a strong performance in a safe Conservative seat, marking the beginning of a prominent political career for Major, who would later become Prime Minister."

    In fact he polled 34,254 votes at that election.

    Accuracy is for low status people.

    Quickly generating, big, thick documents is much more important.
    GPT: garbage produced textually
    The annoying thing is that LLM's such as Chat GPT et al *do* have lots of good uses. Used well, they can be invaluable in narrow areas.

    But the problems are that people use them poorly, and often in areas outside those narrow areas. Because they're trendy. And also because there's a heck of a lot of money being invested in the area, and the hype train is running as people want their money back.

    As ever, be cautious about hype. Sometimes hype is justified; most of the time... it isn't.
    According to Ed Zitron, Microsoft is using CoPilot as an analysis tool for employee assessment. I’m sure that’s doing wonders for staff morale.

    (see about 3/4 of the way down this entertaining rant on the “Growth Mindset” cult thinking that has taken over Microsoft management: https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-cult-of-microsoft/ )
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,158
    Drutt said:

    MASSIVE SAMPLE ALERT

    Dixville Notch, NH has declared Harris 3, Trump 3.
    It was 5-0 Biden and 4-2 Hilary.

    1 registered Republican voted for Harris.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,190
    HYUFD said:

    Farage: "This is the sexy bit: Elon comes in and takes a knife to the [US] deep state. Just like when he bought Twitter he sacked 80 per cent of the staff.

    There are going to be mass lay-offs, whole departments closing and I’m hoping and praying that’s the blueprint for what we then do on our side of the pond.

    Because that’s what Reform UK believes in - that we’re over-bureaucratised and none of it works. This assault on the bureaucratic state is the thing that’s really exciting."

    Really? That's what Reform voters want? 80% of the state slashed and burned.

    The Red Wallers he's after???

    I very much doubt it.

    Most Reform voters are either small businessmen, in the armed forces or white working class private sector workers. So I doubt they are that bothered about Farage promising to slash the civil service and public sector administrators as long as he doesn't also slash the numbers of police, soldiers and doctors and nurses
    I think we need a bucket load of citations to confirm that post.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 22,599

    theProle said:

    Phil said:

    Farage: "This is the sexy bit: Elon comes in and takes a knife to the [US] deep state. Just like when he bought Twitter he sacked 80 per cent of the staff.

    There are going to be mass lay-offs, whole departments closing and I’m hoping and praying that’s the blueprint for what we then do on our side of the pond.

    Because that’s what Reform UK believes in - that we’re over-bureaucratised and none of it works. This assault on the bureaucratic state is the thing that’s really exciting."

    Really? That's what Reform voters want? 80% of the state slashed and burned.

    The Red Wallers he's after???

    I very much doubt it.

    This is all very fascist obviously, but it’s also notable (to me) that Farage completely glosses over the reality that Musk sacked 80% of Twitter’s staff & as a result triggered an 84% drop in it’s revenue. He simply didn’t understand the product Twitter was selling.

    The idea that you can simply hack away 80% of government employees & not end up causing great swathes of harm to people in the real world is for the birds.
    I'm not sure that one followed from the other with Twitter. The drop in advertising revenue has more to do with his brand positioning than the reduction in headcount.

    It's worth remembering that before Musk bought it, Twitter was mostly making thumping losses, and it's business model looked pretty unsustainable. The jury is still out of Musk's version, but I think it's by no means impossible he'll end up making it wash it's face.
    Twitter had started making profit a few years before Musk took over. It took time to get there, but was looking sustainable.

    Then Musk took over.
    This isn't really true. It made money in only 2 years its entire existence before dropping again to unprofitability, and it was really just accounting trickery. It doubled its head count during COVID, which was ridiculous.

    Now, under Musk ownership, a fair criticism is, is the company being improved?

    The underlying problem Twitter has always had, it doesn't know its users, which makes advertising value on the platform far less attractive than Facebook. The genius of Meta is they know so much about every user on all its platforms and has tech to find out more / monetarise this. Twitter has very poor tech behind the scenes and has had limited product development way before Musk.
    https://www.businessofapps.com/data/twitter-statistics/ has numbers. You can see the revenue is healthy, until Musk took over. Profits were good in 2018 and 2019, but losses were bad in 2020. 2021 was then only a small loss.
    Did anything happen to the global economy that made 2020 really bad and 2021 still tough but not as bad as 2020?
  • Stark_DawningStark_Dawning Posts: 9,657
    HYUFD said:

    Farage: "This is the sexy bit: Elon comes in and takes a knife to the [US] deep state. Just like when he bought Twitter he sacked 80 per cent of the staff.

    There are going to be mass lay-offs, whole departments closing and I’m hoping and praying that’s the blueprint for what we then do on our side of the pond.

    Because that’s what Reform UK believes in - that we’re over-bureaucratised and none of it works. This assault on the bureaucratic state is the thing that’s really exciting."

    Really? That's what Reform voters want? 80% of the state slashed and burned.

    The Red Wallers he's after???

    I very much doubt it.

    Most Reform voters are either small businessmen, in the armed forces or white working class private sector workers. So I doubt they are that bothered about Farage promising to slash the civil service and public sector administrators as long as he doesn't also slash the numbers of police, soldiers and doctors and nurses
    Farage needs to start naming the specific jobs he intends to axe, so we can then make an informed assessment about the cuts he's proposing. Vague talk about the 'bureaucratic state' is just so much waffle.
  • FlatlanderFlatlander Posts: 4,596
    RobD said:

    eek said:

    RobD said:

    Andy_JS said:

    Haven't been on ChatGPT for about a year, so I thought I'd see if they've improved their factual information replies.

    They haven't.

    My question: "How many votes did the Conservatives poll in the Huntingdon constituency at the 1983 general election?"

    Answer: "In the 1983 UK general election, the Conservative Party candidate in the Huntingdon constituency, John Major, received 32,833 votes, winning with 54.2% of the vote. This was a strong performance in a safe Conservative seat, marking the beginning of a prominent political career for Major, who would later become Prime Minister."

    In fact he polled 34,254 votes at that election.

    Can you follow up to ask for the source of that incorrect number?
    It doesn't know the source of the incorrect number it's an hallucination..
    I was just curious how it would justify the number.
    I don't think LLM's do justification.

    You can't ask for sources. That's the whole problem.
  • TimTTimT Posts: 6,456

    Nigelb said:

    So what is the playlist tonight as we wait for results? I'll start off with Steely Dan - Haitian Divorce.

    Sorry, Donald, they have fallen out of love....

    Kamala Chameleon
    Then one for the pollsters: Springsteen - "The Ties that Bind"....
    Streets of Philadelphia, surely ?

    Where they'll be Dancin' in the Street.
    Green Day's American Idiot if it's Trump.
    The Revolution Will Not Be Televised (Gil Scott-Heron). An oldie but goodie, which had passed me by until I moved to the US. Not sure UK audiences will know this one
  • HYUFD said:

    Farage: "This is the sexy bit: Elon comes in and takes a knife to the [US] deep state. Just like when he bought Twitter he sacked 80 per cent of the staff.

    There are going to be mass lay-offs, whole departments closing and I’m hoping and praying that’s the blueprint for what we then do on our side of the pond.

    Because that’s what Reform UK believes in - that we’re over-bureaucratised and none of it works. This assault on the bureaucratic state is the thing that’s really exciting."

    Really? That's what Reform voters want? 80% of the state slashed and burned.

    The Red Wallers he's after???

    I very much doubt it.

    Most Reform voters are either small businessmen, in the armed forces or white working class private sector workers. So I doubt they are that bothered about Farage promising to slash the civil service and public sector administrators as long as he doesn't also slash the numbers of police, soldiers and doctors and nurses
    What about tall businesswomen?
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 41,798

    TimT said:

    Nigelb said:

    Nigelb said:

    So what is the playlist tonight as we wait for results? I'll start off with Steely Dan - Haitian Divorce.

    Sorry, Donald, they have fallen out of love....

    Kamala Chameleon
    Then one for the pollsters: Springsteen - "The Ties that Bind"....
    Streets of Philadelphia, surely ?

    Where they'll be Dancin' in the Street.
    Green Day's American Idiot if it's Trump.
    The Lights Went out in Georgia
    Or, for a Trump win, The Devil Went Down to Georgia
    Charlie Daniel's Band. A cracker of a song! Brillant!
    Daniels pretty Trumpy before he carked it.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,426
    edited November 5
    HYUFD said:

    Farage: "This is the sexy bit: Elon comes in and takes a knife to the [US] deep state. Just like when he bought Twitter he sacked 80 per cent of the staff.

    There are going to be mass lay-offs, whole departments closing and I’m hoping and praying that’s the blueprint for what we then do on our side of the pond.

    Because that’s what Reform UK believes in - that we’re over-bureaucratised and none of it works. This assault on the bureaucratic state is the thing that’s really exciting."

    Really? That's what Reform voters want? 80% of the state slashed and burned.

    The Red Wallers he's after???

    I very much doubt it.

    Most Reform voters are either small businessmen, in the armed forces or white working class private sector workers. So I doubt they are that bothered about Farage promising to slash the civil service and public sector administrators as long as he doesn't also slash the numbers of police, soldiers and doctors and nurses
    This is such an idiotic take because if you cut "public sector administrators" you end up paying doctors and police officers to do admin tasks.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 81,440
    edited November 5
    I have a slightly different take on Musk buying twitter. I don't really buy the free speech absolutism, same as the eco-warrior spin on EV cars.

    I think he saw a bloated company that never really made any money and thought he could low ball his way into buying it. At worst he gets a company that ticks along, but on the upside, data. Remember he was an early investor in OpenAI, so he is well aware of the power of data, LLMs, etc.

    But he screwed up over the amount he paid and then was forced to radical cost cutting. But at the same time, he has got sucked down into the twitter rabbit hole, which made things worse, in terms of keeping advertisers happy. And he is a weird dude, who when criticised he fires from the hip unwisely.

    It is worth pointing out, quietly he cut off every bodies elses access to twitter data, formed a spin off and recently set up a 100k GPU cluster....I think that was the original plan all along.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 41,798
    TimT said:

    Nigelb said:

    So what is the playlist tonight as we wait for results? I'll start off with Steely Dan - Haitian Divorce.

    Sorry, Donald, they have fallen out of love....

    Kamala Chameleon
    Then one for the pollsters: Springsteen - "The Ties that Bind"....
    Streets of Philadelphia, surely ?

    Where they'll be Dancin' in the Street.
    Green Day's American Idiot if it's Trump.
    The Revolution Will Not Be Televised (Gil Scott-Heron). An oldie but goodie, which had passed me by until I moved to the US. Not sure UK audiences will know this one
    We do, great song.
    Gil's old dad first black player for Celtic.
  • Northern_AlNorthern_Al Posts: 8,314
    edited November 5
    HYUFD said:

    Farage: "This is the sexy bit: Elon comes in and takes a knife to the [US] deep state. Just like when he bought Twitter he sacked 80 per cent of the staff.

    There are going to be mass lay-offs, whole departments closing and I’m hoping and praying that’s the blueprint for what we then do on our side of the pond.

    Because that’s what Reform UK believes in - that we’re over-bureaucratised and none of it works. This assault on the bureaucratic state is the thing that’s really exciting."

    Really? That's what Reform voters want? 80% of the state slashed and burned.

    The Red Wallers he's after???

    I very much doubt it.

    Most Reform voters are either small businessmen, in the armed forces or white working class private sector workers. So I doubt they are that bothered about Farage promising to slash the civil service and public sector administrators as long as he doesn't also slash the numbers of police, soldiers and doctors and nurses
    Deleted - beaten to it on tall businessmen.
  • TimTTimT Posts: 6,456
    edited November 5

    HYUFD said:

    Farage: "This is the sexy bit: Elon comes in and takes a knife to the [US] deep state. Just like when he bought Twitter he sacked 80 per cent of the staff.

    There are going to be mass lay-offs, whole departments closing and I’m hoping and praying that’s the blueprint for what we then do on our side of the pond.

    Because that’s what Reform UK believes in - that we’re over-bureaucratised and none of it works. This assault on the bureaucratic state is the thing that’s really exciting."

    Really? That's what Reform voters want? 80% of the state slashed and burned.

    The Red Wallers he's after???

    I very much doubt it.

    Most Reform voters are either small businessmen, in the armed forces or white working class private sector workers. So I doubt they are that bothered about Farage promising to slash the civil service and public sector administrators as long as he doesn't also slash the numbers of police, soldiers and doctors and nurses
    This is such an idiotic take because if you cut "public sector administrators" you end up paying doctors and police officers to do admin tasks.
    But when you do that, guess what? Less admin is done vs more real work. Most admin is work for work’s sake, expanding to fill the space.

    For a real-life case, read Frederic Laloux’s Reinventing Organizations, and the Buurtzorg experience. He has other examples
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 42,205

    HYUFD said:

    Farage: "This is the sexy bit: Elon comes in and takes a knife to the [US] deep state. Just like when he bought Twitter he sacked 80 per cent of the staff.

    There are going to be mass lay-offs, whole departments closing and I’m hoping and praying that’s the blueprint for what we then do on our side of the pond.

    Because that’s what Reform UK believes in - that we’re over-bureaucratised and none of it works. This assault on the bureaucratic state is the thing that’s really exciting."

    Really? That's what Reform voters want? 80% of the state slashed and burned.

    The Red Wallers he's after???

    I very much doubt it.

    Most Reform voters are either small businessmen, in the armed forces or white working class private sector workers. So I doubt they are that bothered about Farage promising to slash the civil service and public sector administrators as long as he doesn't also slash the numbers of police, soldiers and doctors and nurses
    This is such an idiotic take because if you cut "public sector administrators" you end up paying doctors and police officers to do admin tasks.
    Because of an NHS cock-up, I was once in the same waiting room on consecutive days. On the first day, there were loads of 'plain clothes' NHS administrators (i.e. did not look like nurses) sitting around chatting, even though the waiting room was busy.

    The next day I saw the same faces, and the waiting room was just as busy, but the staff were far, far busier, with them bustling around doing stuff.

    I think many jobs are like that: periods of inaction then loads of stuff going on.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,426
    edited November 5
    TimT said:

    HYUFD said:

    Farage: "This is the sexy bit: Elon comes in and takes a knife to the [US] deep state. Just like when he bought Twitter he sacked 80 per cent of the staff.

    There are going to be mass lay-offs, whole departments closing and I’m hoping and praying that’s the blueprint for what we then do on our side of the pond.

    Because that’s what Reform UK believes in - that we’re over-bureaucratised and none of it works. This assault on the bureaucratic state is the thing that’s really exciting."

    Really? That's what Reform voters want? 80% of the state slashed and burned.

    The Red Wallers he's after???

    I very much doubt it.

    Most Reform voters are either small businessmen, in the armed forces or white working class private sector workers. So I doubt they are that bothered about Farage promising to slash the civil service and public sector administrators as long as he doesn't also slash the numbers of police, soldiers and doctors and nurses
    This is such an idiotic take because if you cut "public sector administrators" you end up paying doctors and police officers to do admin tasks.
    But when you do that, guess what? Less admin is done vs more real work. Most admin is work for work’s sake, expanding to fill the space.
    That's just not true at all. Management consultancy bollocks.
  • PhilPhil Posts: 2,239

    theProle said:

    Phil said:

    Farage: "This is the sexy bit: Elon comes in and takes a knife to the [US] deep state. Just like when he bought Twitter he sacked 80 per cent of the staff.

    There are going to be mass lay-offs, whole departments closing and I’m hoping and praying that’s the blueprint for what we then do on our side of the pond.

    Because that’s what Reform UK believes in - that we’re over-bureaucratised and none of it works. This assault on the bureaucratic state is the thing that’s really exciting."

    Really? That's what Reform voters want? 80% of the state slashed and burned.

    The Red Wallers he's after???

    I very much doubt it.

    This is all very fascist obviously, but it’s also notable (to me) that Farage completely glosses over the reality that Musk sacked 80% of Twitter’s staff & as a result triggered an 84% drop in it’s revenue. He simply didn’t understand the product Twitter was selling.

    The idea that you can simply hack away 80% of government employees & not end up causing great swathes of harm to people in the real world is for the birds.
    I'm not sure that one followed from the other with Twitter. The drop in advertising revenue has more to do with his brand positioning than the reduction in headcount.

    It's worth remembering that before Musk bought it, Twitter was mostly making thumping losses, and it's business model looked pretty unsustainable. The jury is still out of Musk's version, but I think it's by no means impossible he'll end up making it wash it's face.
    Twitter had started making profit a few years before Musk took over. It took time to get there, but was looking sustainable.

    Then Musk took over.
    This isn't really true. It made money in only 2 years its entire existence before dropping again to unprofitability, and it was really just accounting trickery. It doubled its head count during COVID, which was ridiculous.

    Now, under Musk ownership, a fair criticism is, is the company being improved?

    The underlying problem Twitter has always had, it doesn't know its users, which makes advertising value on the platform far less attractive than Facebook. The genius of Meta is they know so much about every user on all its platforms and has tech to find out more / monetarise this. Twitter has very poor tech behind the scenes and has had limited product development way before Musk.
    https://www.businessofapps.com/data/twitter-statistics/ has numbers. You can see the revenue is healthy, until Musk took over. Profits were good in 2018 and 2019, but losses were bad in 2020. 2021 was then only a small loss.
    As I say, the 2 years of profit were accountancy trickery. Also remember 2020 / 21, loads of companies that were based upon online advertising did extremely well, because we were all stuck in our homes, everybody wanted to sell us shit while we doom scrolled. Since then all tech companies took a hit in 22 / 23, cut lots of staff and now starting to turn it around with the likes of LLMs.

    All tech companies massively over hired during COVID and had to cut back.

    Musk paid far too much for twitter, then a valid criticism is he overdid the cuts and also his behaviour has scared off advertisers. But the fundamentals of twitter haven't changed, very poor tech on the backend (lots of people Musk called in looked at the code and went WTF, this is a shit show), no idea who their users are.
    It’s not just his behaviour - he destroyed the brand safety aspect that made advertisers feel safe advertising on Twitter. Since Twitter was such a small market they could easily drop it altogether.

    That’s a trust that’s hard to regain once lost.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 35,895
    Lines to vote in New Jersey. Apparently never happened before...
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 81,440
    edited November 5
    Phil said:

    theProle said:

    Phil said:

    Farage: "This is the sexy bit: Elon comes in and takes a knife to the [US] deep state. Just like when he bought Twitter he sacked 80 per cent of the staff.

    There are going to be mass lay-offs, whole departments closing and I’m hoping and praying that’s the blueprint for what we then do on our side of the pond.

    Because that’s what Reform UK believes in - that we’re over-bureaucratised and none of it works. This assault on the bureaucratic state is the thing that’s really exciting."

    Really? That's what Reform voters want? 80% of the state slashed and burned.

    The Red Wallers he's after???

    I very much doubt it.

    This is all very fascist obviously, but it’s also notable (to me) that Farage completely glosses over the reality that Musk sacked 80% of Twitter’s staff & as a result triggered an 84% drop in it’s revenue. He simply didn’t understand the product Twitter was selling.

    The idea that you can simply hack away 80% of government employees & not end up causing great swathes of harm to people in the real world is for the birds.
    I'm not sure that one followed from the other with Twitter. The drop in advertising revenue has more to do with his brand positioning than the reduction in headcount.

    It's worth remembering that before Musk bought it, Twitter was mostly making thumping losses, and it's business model looked pretty unsustainable. The jury is still out of Musk's version, but I think it's by no means impossible he'll end up making it wash it's face.
    Twitter had started making profit a few years before Musk took over. It took time to get there, but was looking sustainable.

    Then Musk took over.
    This isn't really true. It made money in only 2 years its entire existence before dropping again to unprofitability, and it was really just accounting trickery. It doubled its head count during COVID, which was ridiculous.

    Now, under Musk ownership, a fair criticism is, is the company being improved?

    The underlying problem Twitter has always had, it doesn't know its users, which makes advertising value on the platform far less attractive than Facebook. The genius of Meta is they know so much about every user on all its platforms and has tech to find out more / monetarise this. Twitter has very poor tech behind the scenes and has had limited product development way before Musk.
    https://www.businessofapps.com/data/twitter-statistics/ has numbers. You can see the revenue is healthy, until Musk took over. Profits were good in 2018 and 2019, but losses were bad in 2020. 2021 was then only a small loss.
    As I say, the 2 years of profit were accountancy trickery. Also remember 2020 / 21, loads of companies that were based upon online advertising did extremely well, because we were all stuck in our homes, everybody wanted to sell us shit while we doom scrolled. Since then all tech companies took a hit in 22 / 23, cut lots of staff and now starting to turn it around with the likes of LLMs.

    All tech companies massively over hired during COVID and had to cut back.

    Musk paid far too much for twitter, then a valid criticism is he overdid the cuts and also his behaviour has scared off advertisers. But the fundamentals of twitter haven't changed, very poor tech on the backend (lots of people Musk called in looked at the code and went WTF, this is a shit show), no idea who their users are.
    It’s not just his behaviour - he destroyed the brand safety aspect that made advertisers feel safe advertising on Twitter. Since Twitter was such a small market they could easily drop it altogether.

    That’s a trust that’s hard to regain once lost.
    Yes I think that is fair. Also as I said, twitter was never a premier place to advertise. Speak to anybody with a business, where / how do you advertise, Google PPC and Meta, because you can carefully target people (although it can be somewhat overstated how accurate it is). The value prop of advertising on twitter has never been that good.

    That is why Meta can have scandals and people still end up on wanting / needing to advertise on Facebook and Instagram. Their knowledge of users and their tech is just way better.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 54,314

    I have a slightly different take on Musk buying twitter. I don't really buy the free speech absolutism, same as the eco-warrior spin on EV cars.

    I think he saw a bloated company that never really made any money and thought he could low ball his way into buying it. At worst he gets a company that ticks along, but on the upside, data. Remember he was an early investor in OpenAI, so he is well aware of the power of data, LLMs, etc.

    But he screwed up over the amount he paid and then was forced to radical cost cutting. But at the same time, he has got sucked down into the twitter rabbit hole, which made things worse, in terms of keeping advertisers happy. And he is a weird dude, who when criticised he fires from the hip unwisely.

    It is worth pointing out, quietly he cut off every bodies elses access to twitter data, formed a spin off and recently set up a 100k GPU cluster....I think that was the original plan all along.

    Musk was on Rogan’s podcast yesterday. They spend half the time talking about politics and the other half talking about various forms of technology.

    Musk says that he primarily wanted a platform with freedom of speech, he didn’t see why he needed tens of thousands of content censors, hadn’t banked on organised advertising boycotts, admits he way overpaid but that it was worth it for the greater good of humanity!
  • Andy_CookeAndy_Cooke Posts: 4,993

    HYUFD said:

    Farage: "This is the sexy bit: Elon comes in and takes a knife to the [US] deep state. Just like when he bought Twitter he sacked 80 per cent of the staff.

    There are going to be mass lay-offs, whole departments closing and I’m hoping and praying that’s the blueprint for what we then do on our side of the pond.

    Because that’s what Reform UK believes in - that we’re over-bureaucratised and none of it works. This assault on the bureaucratic state is the thing that’s really exciting."

    Really? That's what Reform voters want? 80% of the state slashed and burned.

    The Red Wallers he's after???

    I very much doubt it.

    Most Reform voters are either small businessmen, in the armed forces or white working class private sector workers. So I doubt they are that bothered about Farage promising to slash the civil service and public sector administrators as long as he doesn't also slash the numbers of police, soldiers and doctors and nurses
    This is such an idiotic take because if you cut "public sector administrators" you end up paying doctors and police officers to do admin tasks.
    This is the frustration.

    "Cut administration" is one thing, but it's involved and difficult - you have to carry out a process analysis and determine what is necessary administration, beneficial-but-not-essential administration, and unnecessary administration, and then determine the efficiency/inefficiency level and how to get rid of the unnecessary admin and how to streamline and make more efficient the necessary and beneficial admin. Which requires a lot of specific knowledge and is challenging.

    "Cut administrators" is something else entirely, is very popular as a quick and easy soundbite where all you need to do is find out the raw numbers involved, lament the number, and propose slashing them. Without affecting the actual amount or efficiency of the administration itself.

    Doing the former is very welcome, but very rarely is even attempted.
    Doing the latter is often thrown forwards and invariably results in reduced efficiency and overall output because you have highly paid specialists in their actual field of work being required to spend ever-increasing proportions of their time inexpertly attempting the administration (which is still un-streamlined and probably ever more inefficient) rather than doing their actual jobs.
  • IcarusIcarus Posts: 993

    HYUFD said:

    Farage: "This is the sexy bit: Elon comes in and takes a knife to the [US] deep state. Just like when he bought Twitter he sacked 80 per cent of the staff.

    There are going to be mass lay-offs, whole departments closing and I’m hoping and praying that’s the blueprint for what we then do on our side of the pond.

    Because that’s what Reform UK believes in - that we’re over-bureaucratised and none of it works. This assault on the bureaucratic state is the thing that’s really exciting."

    Really? That's what Reform voters want? 80% of the state slashed and burned.

    The Red Wallers he's after???

    I very much doubt it.

    Most Reform voters are either small businessmen, in the armed forces or white working class private sector workers. So I doubt they are that bothered about Farage promising to slash the civil service and public sector administrators as long as he doesn't also slash the numbers of police, soldiers and doctors and nurses
    What about tall businesswomen?
    and golfers.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 77,878

    HYUFD said:

    Farage: "This is the sexy bit: Elon comes in and takes a knife to the [US] deep state. Just like when he bought Twitter he sacked 80 per cent of the staff.

    There are going to be mass lay-offs, whole departments closing and I’m hoping and praying that’s the blueprint for what we then do on our side of the pond.

    Because that’s what Reform UK believes in - that we’re over-bureaucratised and none of it works. This assault on the bureaucratic state is the thing that’s really exciting."

    Really? That's what Reform voters want? 80% of the state slashed and burned.

    The Red Wallers he's after???

    I very much doubt it.

    Most Reform voters are either small businessmen, in the armed forces or white working class private sector workers. So I doubt they are that bothered about Farage promising to slash the civil service and public sector administrators as long as he doesn't also slash the numbers of police, soldiers and doctors and nurses
    This is such an idiotic take because if you cut "public sector administrators" you end up paying doctors and police officers to do admin tasks.
    I think there's a large saving for streamlining paperwork (Ok Laptop/work pad work) in the police for one. Officers and ex officers who phone in to the chat shows seem to have to do a ridiculous amount of paperwork for say a shoplifter. There must be ways to make processes like that more efficient.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,342
    For a Harris big win, how about "Tangled up in Blue"?
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 21,791
    Scott_xP said:

    Lines to vote in New Jersey. Apparently never happened before...

    Male or female? Somebody (@darkage?) mentioned NJ may fall in a Trump landslide. Are we talking Carmela Soprano or Christopher Moltisanti?
  • Sandpit said:

    I have a slightly different take on Musk buying twitter. I don't really buy the free speech absolutism, same as the eco-warrior spin on EV cars.

    I think he saw a bloated company that never really made any money and thought he could low ball his way into buying it. At worst he gets a company that ticks along, but on the upside, data. Remember he was an early investor in OpenAI, so he is well aware of the power of data, LLMs, etc.

    But he screwed up over the amount he paid and then was forced to radical cost cutting. But at the same time, he has got sucked down into the twitter rabbit hole, which made things worse, in terms of keeping advertisers happy. And he is a weird dude, who when criticised he fires from the hip unwisely.

    It is worth pointing out, quietly he cut off every bodies elses access to twitter data, formed a spin off and recently set up a 100k GPU cluster....I think that was the original plan all along.

    Musk was on Rogan’s podcast yesterday. They spend half the time talking about politics and the other half talking about various forms of technology.

    Musk says that he primarily wanted a platform with freedom of speech, he didn’t see why he needed tens of thousands of content censors, hadn’t banked on organised advertising boycotts, admits he way overpaid but that it was worth it for the greater good of humanity!
    Last paragraph. Full of it as usual. Does he want is self-driving car technology passed asap and believes he has backed the right party for that? Just a thought.
  • TimTTimT Posts: 6,456

    TimT said:

    HYUFD said:

    Farage: "This is the sexy bit: Elon comes in and takes a knife to the [US] deep state. Just like when he bought Twitter he sacked 80 per cent of the staff.

    There are going to be mass lay-offs, whole departments closing and I’m hoping and praying that’s the blueprint for what we then do on our side of the pond.

    Because that’s what Reform UK believes in - that we’re over-bureaucratised and none of it works. This assault on the bureaucratic state is the thing that’s really exciting."

    Really? That's what Reform voters want? 80% of the state slashed and burned.

    The Red Wallers he's after???

    I very much doubt it.

    Most Reform voters are either small businessmen, in the armed forces or white working class private sector workers. So I doubt they are that bothered about Farage promising to slash the civil service and public sector administrators as long as he doesn't also slash the numbers of police, soldiers and doctors and nurses
    This is such an idiotic take because if you cut "public sector administrators" you end up paying doctors and police officers to do admin tasks.
    But when you do that, guess what? Less admin is done vs more real work. Most admin is work for work’s sake, expanding to fill the space.
    That's just not true at all. Management consultancy bollocks.
    So, you have not read the reference.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 54,672
    Andy_JS said:

    Haven't been on ChatGPT for about a year, so I thought I'd see if they've improved their factual information replies.

    They haven't.

    My question: "How many votes did the Conservatives poll in the Huntingdon constituency at the 1983 general election?"

    Answer: "In the 1983 UK general election, the Conservative Party candidate in the Huntingdon constituency, John Major, received 32,833 votes, winning with 54.2% of the vote. This was a strong performance in a safe Conservative seat, marking the beginning of a prominent political career for Major, who would later become Prime Minister."

    In fact he polled 34,254 votes at that election.

    Claude 3.6’s answer:

    “Since this is a very specific historical electoral statistic from a single constituency, I should note that while I try to be accurate, I may hallucinate specific numbers like this. The Conservatives won Huntingdon in 1983 (with John Major as their candidate), but I don't want to state a specific vote total without being completely certain of the figure. I'd recommend checking official electoral records or the BBC's historical election database for the exact number.”

    Admirable self-awareness
  • numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 6,771
    viewcode said:

    Scott_xP said:

    Lines to vote in New Jersey. Apparently never happened before...

    Male or female? Somebody (@darkage?) mentioned NJ may fall in a Trump landslide. Are we talking Carmela Soprano or Christopher Moltisanti?
    LOL. Trump isn’t winning New Jersey.
  • PhilPhil Posts: 2,239
    Sandpit said:

    I have a slightly different take on Musk buying twitter. I don't really buy the free speech absolutism, same as the eco-warrior spin on EV cars.

    I think he saw a bloated company that never really made any money and thought he could low ball his way into buying it. At worst he gets a company that ticks along, but on the upside, data. Remember he was an early investor in OpenAI, so he is well aware of the power of data, LLMs, etc.

    But he screwed up over the amount he paid and then was forced to radical cost cutting. But at the same time, he has got sucked down into the twitter rabbit hole, which made things worse, in terms of keeping advertisers happy. And he is a weird dude, who when criticised he fires from the hip unwisely.

    It is worth pointing out, quietly he cut off every bodies elses access to twitter data, formed a spin off and recently set up a 100k GPU cluster....I think that was the original plan all along.

    Musk was on Rogan’s podcast yesterday. They spend half the time talking about politics and the other half talking about various forms of technology.

    Musk says that he primarily wanted a platform with freedom of speech, he didn’t see why he needed tens of thousands of content censors, hadn’t banked on organised advertising boycotts, admits he way overpaid but that it was worth it for the greater good of humanity!
    Yes, like I said: he didn’t understand what he had bought & clearly still doesn’t. So he’s trying to turn it into something he does understand instead. It might even work!
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,426
    edited November 5
    Pulpstar said:

    HYUFD said:

    Farage: "This is the sexy bit: Elon comes in and takes a knife to the [US] deep state. Just like when he bought Twitter he sacked 80 per cent of the staff.

    There are going to be mass lay-offs, whole departments closing and I’m hoping and praying that’s the blueprint for what we then do on our side of the pond.

    Because that’s what Reform UK believes in - that we’re over-bureaucratised and none of it works. This assault on the bureaucratic state is the thing that’s really exciting."

    Really? That's what Reform voters want? 80% of the state slashed and burned.

    The Red Wallers he's after???

    I very much doubt it.

    Most Reform voters are either small businessmen, in the armed forces or white working class private sector workers. So I doubt they are that bothered about Farage promising to slash the civil service and public sector administrators as long as he doesn't also slash the numbers of police, soldiers and doctors and nurses
    This is such an idiotic take because if you cut "public sector administrators" you end up paying doctors and police officers to do admin tasks.
    I think there's a large saving for streamlining paperwork (Ok Laptop/work pad work) in the police for one. Officers and ex officers who phone in to the chat shows seem to have to do a ridiculous amount of paperwork for say a shoplifter. There must be ways to make processes like that more efficient.
    I agree but streamlining processes is something entirely different to simply cutting vast swathes of "administrators" and then letting the doctors and nurses and police officers etc pick up the pieces.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 54,314
    My entry for the playlist - jazz cover of American Idiot, originally by Green Day, posted to Youtube on 20th Jan 2016 ;)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WhqokQ-BEpA
  • TimT said:

    Nigelb said:

    Nigelb said:

    So what is the playlist tonight as we wait for results? I'll start off with Steely Dan - Haitian Divorce.

    Sorry, Donald, they have fallen out of love....

    Kamala Chameleon
    Then one for the pollsters: Springsteen - "The Ties that Bind"....
    Streets of Philadelphia, surely ?

    Where they'll be Dancin' in the Street.
    Green Day's American Idiot if it's Trump.
    The Lights Went out in Georgia
    Or, for a Trump win, The Devil Went Down to Georgia
    Charlie Daniel's Band. A cracker of a song! Brillant!
    Daniels pretty Trumpy before he carked it.
    I believe he was.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 81,440
    edited November 5
    Sandpit said:

    I have a slightly different take on Musk buying twitter. I don't really buy the free speech absolutism, same as the eco-warrior spin on EV cars.

    I think he saw a bloated company that never really made any money and thought he could low ball his way into buying it. At worst he gets a company that ticks along, but on the upside, data. Remember he was an early investor in OpenAI, so he is well aware of the power of data, LLMs, etc.

    But he screwed up over the amount he paid and then was forced to radical cost cutting. But at the same time, he has got sucked down into the twitter rabbit hole, which made things worse, in terms of keeping advertisers happy. And he is a weird dude, who when criticised he fires from the hip unwisely.

    It is worth pointing out, quietly he cut off every bodies elses access to twitter data, formed a spin off and recently set up a 100k GPU cluster....I think that was the original plan all along.

    Musk was on Rogan’s podcast yesterday. They spend half the time talking about politics and the other half talking about various forms of technology.

    Musk says that he primarily wanted a platform with freedom of speech, he didn’t see why he needed tens of thousands of content censors, hadn’t banked on organised advertising boycotts, admits he way overpaid but that it was worth it for the greater good of humanity!
    As I say, I am not totally convinced by that.

    Look at every Musk play in the past, there is always another angle. Tesla, he has bought up so many of the prime locations for charging, such that between the charging tech and locations, everybody is now having to pay them for access...look at SpaceX / Starlink, he is getting himself a monopoly on internet for airlines.... And he got the government to basically provide a big chunk of capital in loans and subsides, for these endeavours.

    They are not the stated missions of the companies.

    Pretty much straight away setting up an AI sister company, and training LLMs, cutting off outside access to data, and now doubling down by setting up a 100k GPU compute cluster, says I have a different motive than (just) I want a free speech social network.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,342
    TimT said:

    Nigelb said:

    So what is the playlist tonight as we wait for results? I'll start off with Steely Dan - Haitian Divorce.

    Sorry, Donald, they have fallen out of love....

    Kamala Chameleon
    Then one for the pollsters: Springsteen - "The Ties that Bind"....
    Streets of Philadelphia, surely ?

    Where they'll be Dancin' in the Street.
    Green Day's American Idiot if it's Trump.
    The Revolution Will Not Be Televised (Gil Scott-Heron). An oldie but goodie, which had passed me by until I moved to the US. Not sure UK audiences will know this one
    I certainly do. Classic.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,077
    Pulpstar said:

    HYUFD said:

    Farage: "This is the sexy bit: Elon comes in and takes a knife to the [US] deep state. Just like when he bought Twitter he sacked 80 per cent of the staff.

    There are going to be mass lay-offs, whole departments closing and I’m hoping and praying that’s the blueprint for what we then do on our side of the pond.

    Because that’s what Reform UK believes in - that we’re over-bureaucratised and none of it works. This assault on the bureaucratic state is the thing that’s really exciting."

    Really? That's what Reform voters want? 80% of the state slashed and burned.

    The Red Wallers he's after???

    I very much doubt it.

    Most Reform voters are either small businessmen, in the armed forces or white working class private sector workers. So I doubt they are that bothered about Farage promising to slash the civil service and public sector administrators as long as he doesn't also slash the numbers of police, soldiers and doctors and nurses
    This is such an idiotic take because if you cut "public sector administrators" you end up paying doctors and police officers to do admin tasks.
    I think there's a large saving for streamlining paperwork (Ok Laptop/work pad work) in the police for one. Officers and ex officers who phone in to the chat shows seem to have to do a ridiculous amount of paperwork for say a shoplifter. There must be ways to make processes like that more efficient.
    There are a whole set of apps already available to simplify police paperwork - https://node4.co.uk/ have done a lot of work there for Cumbria and Durham Police.

    Whether other police forces are using the software is a different question but the work Node 4 did was designed to allow police officers to do all the paperwork there and then as quickly as possible.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 21,791
    @MarqueeMark @Renegade_pollster

    I was impressed by your analyses and have added them and you to a backstage discussion. If you want to add further data or argue perhaps there will be good and I'll write it up for the team later.
  • TimT said:

    Nigelb said:

    Nigelb said:

    So what is the playlist tonight as we wait for results? I'll start off with Steely Dan - Haitian Divorce.

    Sorry, Donald, they have fallen out of love....

    Kamala Chameleon
    Then one for the pollsters: Springsteen - "The Ties that Bind"....
    Streets of Philadelphia, surely ?

    Where they'll be Dancin' in the Street.
    Green Day's American Idiot if it's Trump.
    The Lights Went out in Georgia
    Or, for a Trump win, The Devil Went Down to Georgia
    Charlie Daniel's Band. A cracker of a song! Brillant!
    Daniels pretty Trumpy before he carked it.
    I believe he was.
    Johnny still whipped the Devil.
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,678

    HYUFD said:

    Farage: "This is the sexy bit: Elon comes in and takes a knife to the [US] deep state. Just like when he bought Twitter he sacked 80 per cent of the staff.

    There are going to be mass lay-offs, whole departments closing and I’m hoping and praying that’s the blueprint for what we then do on our side of the pond.

    Because that’s what Reform UK believes in - that we’re over-bureaucratised and none of it works. This assault on the bureaucratic state is the thing that’s really exciting."

    Really? That's what Reform voters want? 80% of the state slashed and burned.

    The Red Wallers he's after???

    I very much doubt it.

    Most Reform voters are either small businessmen, in the armed forces or white working class private sector workers. So I doubt they are that bothered about Farage promising to slash the civil service and public sector administrators as long as he doesn't also slash the numbers of police, soldiers and doctors and nurses
    This is such an idiotic take because if you cut "public sector administrators" you end up paying doctors and police officers to do admin tasks.
    Reform voters don't want things to work; they just want to punish those they think responsible for making things not work. If they thought things through in any detail they wouldn't be voting Reform in the first place.

    Which is why it's incumbent on the mainstream parties to actually bother with some political education about how the public sector *does* work, and why (for example) medical administrators are necessary.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,190
    edited November 5
    Listening to Shelagh Fogerty on LBC she had a guy called Dan, a Brit from New Jersey, who claims NJ is going red. Previously a woman called Gemma from Britain who voted for Harris in NY says that her friends are all voting Trump. They are suggesting a Trump landslide based on the economy.

    William Glenn and Darkage have called this.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,077
    edited November 5
    Sandpit said:

    I have a slightly different take on Musk buying twitter. I don't really buy the free speech absolutism, same as the eco-warrior spin on EV cars.

    I think he saw a bloated company that never really made any money and thought he could low ball his way into buying it. At worst he gets a company that ticks along, but on the upside, data. Remember he was an early investor in OpenAI, so he is well aware of the power of data, LLMs, etc.

    But he screwed up over the amount he paid and then was forced to radical cost cutting. But at the same time, he has got sucked down into the twitter rabbit hole, which made things worse, in terms of keeping advertisers happy. And he is a weird dude, who when criticised he fires from the hip unwisely.

    It is worth pointing out, quietly he cut off every bodies elses access to twitter data, formed a spin off and recently set up a 100k GPU cluster....I think that was the original plan all along.

    Musk was on Rogan’s podcast yesterday. They spend half the time talking about politics and the other half talking about various forms of technology.

    Musk says that he primarily wanted a platform with freedom of speech, he didn’t see why he needed tens of thousands of content censors, hadn’t banked on organised advertising boycotts, admits he way overpaid but that it was worth it for the greater good of humanity!
    If he doesn't understand the need for content censors he's not running it for the greater good of humanity...

    What's interesting at the moment is that having removed the content censors he's now removing the methods by which readers can restrict what they see with his half baked changes to account blocking..
  • LeonLeon Posts: 54,672
    PB has an IQ of 37 when it comes to AI
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 21,791
    To: @MarqueeMark
    From: @viewcode

    Sir, I note your insistence that women predominantly vote for KH, and men for DJT. Do you have a source for this pleased based on a survey or some recorded fact?
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,190
    Scott_xP said:

    Lines to vote in New Jersey. Apparently never happened before...

    Dan from NJ on LBC is predicting NJ goes red.
  • KnightOutKnightOut Posts: 134

    KnightOut said:

    I'd say it's fairly common thinking amongst educated here that having fewer/no children is absolutely fine and would do a great service to the planet, so its not really a problem.

    This ignores the very serious social, political and economic consequences if it continues unchecked - which could ultimately lead to states falling apart into (and not excluding at the extremes) bankruptcy, disorder and anarchy.

    What you probably want is some sort of long-term population stabilisation.

    Yes, I'm quite concerned about the prospect of rapid population falls.

    I suspect that culturally and economically it's quite hard to hit on close to replacement level. There are feedbacks which will push away from stability.

    The idea of a world with a global fertility rate below 1.5 is quite depressing.
    It is so depressing. Children are the most incredible gift and the source of almost all joy in the world. There is an upside for the natural world from a lower human population, but it's hard to see a rapidly falling population as anything other than a tragedy.
    It really does depend on exactly *who* is having/raising the children. Or failing to have them.This is the uncomfortable truth.

    Our society has arguably been hyper-reproductive in the 'wrong' areas, and pretty barren amongst those whose offspring would, on balance, have the potential to make a more positive impact.

    I know this is a generalisation and I'd never argue for any forceful intervention of any kind, but it is the reality, however unpalatable.

    Genetics, background, culture, geography, money, time, intellect, consciousness, politics - all stuff that can make a difference.

    This is why it pisses me off when politicians say 'talent is evenly distributed but opportunity isn't '. What evidence is the first assertion based on? Has there been some big Trading Places-style experiment that we weren't told about.
    Getting a ‘high status male’ vibe..
    Let's reminisce about the times when the Right used to attack the Left for past eugenics support.

    The critical re-evaluation from Spiked can't be far away, surely?

    Oh I'm dead against Eurgenics. Or indeed, as I said, any form of forced intervention. I feel exactly the same way about poverty and inequal starts in life and all manner of other things.

    And this is, fundamentally, what the Left just don't get about us LIbertarians: We are capable of noticing things and analysing stuff without jumping to the conclusion that they must be 'fixed', and that said fixing should be done by an all-powerful state.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 21,791

    Listening to Shelagh Fogerty on LBC she had a guy called Dan, a Brit from New Jersey, who claims NJ is going red. Previously a woman called Gemma from Britain who voted for Harris in NY says that her friends are all voting Trump. They are suggesting a Trump landslide based on the economy.

    William Glenn has called this.

    Damn
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 54,314
    eek said:

    Sandpit said:

    I have a slightly different take on Musk buying twitter. I don't really buy the free speech absolutism, same as the eco-warrior spin on EV cars.

    I think he saw a bloated company that never really made any money and thought he could low ball his way into buying it. At worst he gets a company that ticks along, but on the upside, data. Remember he was an early investor in OpenAI, so he is well aware of the power of data, LLMs, etc.

    But he screwed up over the amount he paid and then was forced to radical cost cutting. But at the same time, he has got sucked down into the twitter rabbit hole, which made things worse, in terms of keeping advertisers happy. And he is a weird dude, who when criticised he fires from the hip unwisely.

    It is worth pointing out, quietly he cut off every bodies elses access to twitter data, formed a spin off and recently set up a 100k GPU cluster....I think that was the original plan all along.

    Musk was on Rogan’s podcast yesterday. They spend half the time talking about politics and the other half talking about various forms of technology.

    Musk says that he primarily wanted a platform with freedom of speech, he didn’t see why he needed tens of thousands of content censors, hadn’t banked on organised advertising boycotts, admits he way overpaid but that it was worth it for the greater good of humanity!
    If he doesn't understand the need for content censors he's not running it for the greater good of humanity...
    He didn’t see the need for tens of thousands of them proactively deleting posts and banning people, no. Twitter’s staff numbers had doubled during the pandemic.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 21,791

    viewcode said:

    Scott_xP said:

    Lines to vote in New Jersey. Apparently never happened before...

    Male or female? Somebody (@darkage?) mentioned NJ may fall in a Trump landslide. Are we talking Carmela Soprano or Christopher Moltisanti?
    LOL. Trump isn’t winning New Jersey.
    "Labour isn't winning Canterbury"
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,301
    edited November 5
    Leon said:

    Andy_JS said:

    Haven't been on ChatGPT for about a year, so I thought I'd see if they've improved their factual information replies.

    They haven't.

    My question: "How many votes did the Conservatives poll in the Huntingdon constituency at the 1983 general election?"

    Answer: "In the 1983 UK general election, the Conservative Party candidate in the Huntingdon constituency, John Major, received 32,833 votes, winning with 54.2% of the vote. This was a strong performance in a safe Conservative seat, marking the beginning of a prominent political career for Major, who would later become Prime Minister."

    In fact he polled 34,254 votes at that election.

    Claude 3.6’s answer:

    “Since this is a very specific historical electoral statistic from a single constituency, I should note that while I try to be accurate, I may hallucinate specific numbers like this. The Conservatives won Huntingdon in 1983 (with John Major as their candidate), but I don't want to state a specific vote total without being completely certain of the figure. I'd recommend checking official electoral records or the BBC's historical election database for the exact number.”

    Admirable self-awareness
    Stop talking about AI, you know the rules.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 77,878
    viewcode said:

    Listening to Shelagh Fogerty on LBC she had a guy called Dan, a Brit from New Jersey, who claims NJ is going red. Previously a woman called Gemma from Britain who voted for Harris in NY says that her friends are all voting Trump. They are suggesting a Trump landslide based on the economy.

    William Glenn has called this.

    Damn
    Just imagine if New Jersey and Virginia went red with Iowa and Kansas blue.

    Just hold that thought for one second.
  • SelebianSelebian Posts: 8,609

    TimT said:

    HYUFD said:

    Farage: "This is the sexy bit: Elon comes in and takes a knife to the [US] deep state. Just like when he bought Twitter he sacked 80 per cent of the staff.

    There are going to be mass lay-offs, whole departments closing and I’m hoping and praying that’s the blueprint for what we then do on our side of the pond.

    Because that’s what Reform UK believes in - that we’re over-bureaucratised and none of it works. This assault on the bureaucratic state is the thing that’s really exciting."

    Really? That's what Reform voters want? 80% of the state slashed and burned.

    The Red Wallers he's after???

    I very much doubt it.

    Most Reform voters are either small businessmen, in the armed forces or white working class private sector workers. So I doubt they are that bothered about Farage promising to slash the civil service and public sector administrators as long as he doesn't also slash the numbers of police, soldiers and doctors and nurses
    This is such an idiotic take because if you cut "public sector administrators" you end up paying doctors and police officers to do admin tasks.
    But when you do that, guess what? Less admin is done vs more real work. Most admin is work for work’s sake, expanding to fill the space.
    That's just not true at all. Management consultancy bollocks.
    Well, it can be.

    But the solution is to remove the excess process or change it to a more efficient/automated pathway and then consider whether you can reduce the admin head count.

    Simply firing administrators but not changing the processes means, as you said, that people who should be doing the other jobs end up doing the admin. Badly.

    Taking the NHS, because there's neither a single IT system nor a sensible way of systems talking to each other, administrators write up notes and email them (or post) to the GP and then another administrator then enters the information on the primary care record. You could save a lot of admin time with systems that can talk to each other and send and receive updates automatically (as well as reducing the scope for error and delay).

    Another example would be trying to book or change appointments - you call someone up who sits in front of some kind of online calendar/booking system and translates your voice commands into making a booking on that system. For most people it would be a hell of a lot more efficient to be able to do that online themselves (there could be a generic telephone booking service for those less able to use an online system).
  • eekeek Posts: 28,077
    Sandpit said:

    eek said:

    Sandpit said:

    I have a slightly different take on Musk buying twitter. I don't really buy the free speech absolutism, same as the eco-warrior spin on EV cars.

    I think he saw a bloated company that never really made any money and thought he could low ball his way into buying it. At worst he gets a company that ticks along, but on the upside, data. Remember he was an early investor in OpenAI, so he is well aware of the power of data, LLMs, etc.

    But he screwed up over the amount he paid and then was forced to radical cost cutting. But at the same time, he has got sucked down into the twitter rabbit hole, which made things worse, in terms of keeping advertisers happy. And he is a weird dude, who when criticised he fires from the hip unwisely.

    It is worth pointing out, quietly he cut off every bodies elses access to twitter data, formed a spin off and recently set up a 100k GPU cluster....I think that was the original plan all along.

    Musk was on Rogan’s podcast yesterday. They spend half the time talking about politics and the other half talking about various forms of technology.

    Musk says that he primarily wanted a platform with freedom of speech, he didn’t see why he needed tens of thousands of content censors, hadn’t banked on organised advertising boycotts, admits he way overpaid but that it was worth it for the greater good of humanity!
    If he doesn't understand the need for content censors he's not running it for the greater good of humanity...
    He didn’t see the need for tens of thousands of them proactively deleting posts and banning people, no. Twitter’s staff numbers had doubled during the pandemic.
    That's the problem with running a social media network - you need to employ a lot of people to moderate what dubious people want to post..
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,678
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    Stocky said:

    If Harris won Nevada, as Ralston predicts, then she can afford to lose Penn as long as she gains either Georgia or N Carolina.

    Bear in mind that Biden won 306 ECVs and Trump still dragged the process out into January, with violence on the streets. Harris does only need 270 ECVs to win but if she does land in the 270s, it'll get very ugly before it gets better - assuming that Trump doesn't manage to persuade Congress and/or the courts to fiddle the result for him (which is unlikely but certainly not impossible).
    Unless it is 268 each Congress has no power to intervene directly and in 2020 remember even most GOP Senators voted that Biden had won even if most GOP House Reps voted to challenge state results and say Trump had won.

    The courts cannot intervene either unless to stop the count but Trump would have to be ahead in that states count anyway at that point
    It's 269 for a tie. But leaving that aside:

    Congress has absolute discretion to count the votes, which also means validating the votes. It can throw out a state's votes if it considers those votes to be invalid - and it can use whatever argument it likes to come to such a determination. There is no obligation on Congress to produce a 538 total, or to 'find' votes in place of a set it doesn't like.

    The count in Congress has generally been entirely procedural but it isn't, necessarily: it's a functional part of the process and if there is dispute as to who the valid Electors are, or should be, or whether they have cast their votes correctly or not, Congress can choose not to count them.

    Now, I agree that it's unlikely that the GOP would have the votes to play such shenanigans and that Trump also actually lost the election. In reality, it'd take a Red Wave to give the Republicans the votes - and such a wave would almost certainly bring Trump victory via the normal route. Nonetheless, if he wants to play silly, it's an option.

    How the courts could intervene, and to do what, is pretty much unclear but US courts, and especially the Supreme Court, tend not to be shy about asserting their powers over pretty much everything else.
    No it can't, Congress needs 2/3 majorities in both Chambers to invalidate state votes.

    As I said in 2020 not even a majority of GOP Senators voted for that let alone a majority of Democratic Congressional representatives and Senators so it is not happening.

    As I also said the Courts have no constitutional power to do anything but stop the count, as they did in Florida in 2000 but if Harris is ahead in a state already when they do that it makes no difference anyway
    What's your source for the two-thirds provision? It's not in either the constitution or the Electoral Count Reform and Presidential Transition Improvement Act 2022, as far as I can see. I think the vote would operate under a straight plurality.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 27,575
    Andy_JS said:

    FPT

    Scott_xP said:

    Oh dear. How sad. Never mind.

    @Steven_Swinford
    Kemi Badenoch was left infuriated after The Times disclosed that she had appointed Robert Jenrick as her shadow justice secretary yesterday

    Badenoch had wanted to announce Jenrick’s appointment today so the appointments of Priti Patel as shadow foreign secretary and Mel Stride as shadow chancellor would take the headlines

    She must have leaked the news to someone in the first place.
    Jenrick would have known, of course, but so would all the others who were not offered the job, and it would not be hard to deduce from the Shadow Cabinet teamsheet with a blank space and no mention of their star striker.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,190
    Leon said:

    PB has an IQ of 37 when it comes to AI

    If we are all stuck on zero that still means you only have an IQ of 37.
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 17,069

    HYUFD said:

    Farage: "This is the sexy bit: Elon comes in and takes a knife to the [US] deep state. Just like when he bought Twitter he sacked 80 per cent of the staff.

    There are going to be mass lay-offs, whole departments closing and I’m hoping and praying that’s the blueprint for what we then do on our side of the pond.

    Because that’s what Reform UK believes in - that we’re over-bureaucratised and none of it works. This assault on the bureaucratic state is the thing that’s really exciting."

    Really? That's what Reform voters want? 80% of the state slashed and burned.

    The Red Wallers he's after???

    I very much doubt it.

    Most Reform voters are either small businessmen, in the armed forces or white working class private sector workers. So I doubt they are that bothered about Farage promising to slash the civil service and public sector administrators as long as he doesn't also slash the numbers of police, soldiers and doctors and nurses
    This is such an idiotic take because if you cut "public sector administrators" you end up paying doctors and police officers to do admin tasks.
    Because of an NHS cock-up, I was once in the same waiting room on consecutive days. On the first day, there were loads of 'plain clothes' NHS administrators (i.e. did not look like nurses) sitting around chatting, even though the waiting room was busy.

    The next day I saw the same faces, and the waiting room was just as busy, but the staff were far, far busier, with them bustling around doing stuff.

    I think many jobs are like that: periods of inaction then loads of stuff going on.
    It's the thing we saw during the plague; some of that fat in organisations is there to provide resilience when things get hectic. An insurance policy, in other words. Tempting to cut, but you regret its lack when it's not there.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 54,672

    Sandpit said:

    I have a slightly different take on Musk buying twitter. I don't really buy the free speech absolutism, same as the eco-warrior spin on EV cars.

    I think he saw a bloated company that never really made any money and thought he could low ball his way into buying it. At worst he gets a company that ticks along, but on the upside, data. Remember he was an early investor in OpenAI, so he is well aware of the power of data, LLMs, etc.

    But he screwed up over the amount he paid and then was forced to radical cost cutting. But at the same time, he has got sucked down into the twitter rabbit hole, which made things worse, in terms of keeping advertisers happy. And he is a weird dude, who when criticised he fires from the hip unwisely.

    It is worth pointing out, quietly he cut off every bodies elses access to twitter data, formed a spin off and recently set up a 100k GPU cluster....I think that was the original plan all along.

    Musk was on Rogan’s podcast yesterday. They spend half the time talking about politics and the other half talking about various forms of technology.

    Musk says that he primarily wanted a platform with freedom of speech, he didn’t see why he needed tens of thousands of content censors, hadn’t banked on organised advertising boycotts, admits he way overpaid but that it was worth it for the greater good of humanity!
    As I say, I am not totally convinced by that.

    Look at every Musk play in the past, there is always another angle. Tesla, he has bought up so many of the prime locations for charging, such that between the charging tech and locations, everybody is now having to pay them for access...look at SpaceX / Starlink, he is getting himself a monopoly on internet for airlines....

    They are not the stated missions of the companies.

    Pretty much straight away setting up an AI sister company, and training LLMs, cutting off outside access to data, and now doubling down by setting up a 100k GPU compute cluster, says I have a different motive than (just) I want a free speech social network.
    Or, it’s a bit of all seven. He ended up vastly overpaying for Twitter, he then further fucked it up with the rebrand however he hugely reduced costs. He realised it gave him a free speech megaphone with which to influence the world - but also annoy people - not good. And now he’s noticed he can harvest mega data for his Grok AI

    He’s an innovator and a twat and an entrepreneur. He makes terrible errors but he learns from those errors and can sometimes turn them to huge advantage

    He’s not a man to bet against, not lightly
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,247
    Pulpstar said:

    viewcode said:

    Listening to Shelagh Fogerty on LBC she had a guy called Dan, a Brit from New Jersey, who claims NJ is going red. Previously a woman called Gemma from Britain who voted for Harris in NY says that her friends are all voting Trump. They are suggesting a Trump landslide based on the economy.

    William Glenn has called this.

    Damn
    Just imagine if New Jersey and Virginia went red with Iowa and Kansas blue.

    Just hold that thought for one second.
    I think more likely is NJ and Virginia are much closer but narrow Harris wins still but Iowa and Kansas are also closer but Iowa goes for Harris and Kansas still goes Trump. So main impact is boost for Trump in popular vote as former 2 are more populous but boost for Harris in EC with Iowa
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 54,314
    edited November 5

    Listening to Shelagh Fogerty on LBC she had a guy called Dan, a Brit from New Jersey, who claims NJ is going red. Previously a woman called Gemma from Britain who voted for Harris in NY says that her friends are all voting Trump. They are suggesting a Trump landslide based on the economy.

    William Glenn and Darkage have called this.

    If NY and NJ are in play then it’s a Trump landslide. Can’t see it personally, still think it’s 50/50.

    Both sides on Twitter have mostly stopped screaming insults at each other, and are now very clearly working to get out their own vote.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 35,895
    @MikeDrucker

    when you accidentally write the most pro-Kamala tweet of the election

    https://x.com/MikeDrucker/status/1853792800006910221
  • viewcode said:

    viewcode said:

    Scott_xP said:

    Lines to vote in New Jersey. Apparently never happened before...

    Male or female? Somebody (@darkage?) mentioned NJ may fall in a Trump landslide. Are we talking Carmela Soprano or Christopher Moltisanti?
    LOL. Trump isn’t winning New Jersey.
    "Labour isn't winning Canterbury"
    LBC. Calls it everytime. It is time to throw in the towel.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 81,440
    edited November 5
    Leon said:

    Sandpit said:

    I have a slightly different take on Musk buying twitter. I don't really buy the free speech absolutism, same as the eco-warrior spin on EV cars.

    I think he saw a bloated company that never really made any money and thought he could low ball his way into buying it. At worst he gets a company that ticks along, but on the upside, data. Remember he was an early investor in OpenAI, so he is well aware of the power of data, LLMs, etc.

    But he screwed up over the amount he paid and then was forced to radical cost cutting. But at the same time, he has got sucked down into the twitter rabbit hole, which made things worse, in terms of keeping advertisers happy. And he is a weird dude, who when criticised he fires from the hip unwisely.

    It is worth pointing out, quietly he cut off every bodies elses access to twitter data, formed a spin off and recently set up a 100k GPU cluster....I think that was the original plan all along.

    Musk was on Rogan’s podcast yesterday. They spend half the time talking about politics and the other half talking about various forms of technology.

    Musk says that he primarily wanted a platform with freedom of speech, he didn’t see why he needed tens of thousands of content censors, hadn’t banked on organised advertising boycotts, admits he way overpaid but that it was worth it for the greater good of humanity!
    As I say, I am not totally convinced by that.

    Look at every Musk play in the past, there is always another angle. Tesla, he has bought up so many of the prime locations for charging, such that between the charging tech and locations, everybody is now having to pay them for access...look at SpaceX / Starlink, he is getting himself a monopoly on internet for airlines....

    They are not the stated missions of the companies.

    Pretty much straight away setting up an AI sister company, and training LLMs, cutting off outside access to data, and now doubling down by setting up a 100k GPU compute cluster, says I have a different motive than (just) I want a free speech social network.
    Or, it’s a bit of all seven. He ended up vastly overpaying for Twitter, he then further fucked it up with the rebrand however he hugely reduced costs. He realised it gave him a free speech megaphone with which to influence the world - but also annoy people - not good. And now he’s noticed he can harvest mega data for his Grok AI

    He’s an innovator and a twat and an entrepreneur. He makes terrible errors but he learns from those errors and can sometimes turn them to huge advantage

    He’s not a man to bet against, not lightly
    The harvest mega data / cut everybody else off / train LLMs, started from the get-go. They had the first version of Grok LLM out in a year, you don't just train those things overnight.
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,678
    Phil said:

    Farage: "This is the sexy bit: Elon comes in and takes a knife to the [US] deep state. Just like when he bought Twitter he sacked 80 per cent of the staff.

    There are going to be mass lay-offs, whole departments closing and I’m hoping and praying that’s the blueprint for what we then do on our side of the pond.

    Because that’s what Reform UK believes in - that we’re over-bureaucratised and none of it works. This assault on the bureaucratic state is the thing that’s really exciting."

    Really? That's what Reform voters want? 80% of the state slashed and burned.

    The Red Wallers he's after???

    I very much doubt it.

    This is all very fascist obviously, but it’s also notable (to me) that Farage completely glosses over the reality that Musk sacked 80% of Twitter’s staff & as a result triggered an 84% drop in it’s revenue. He simply didn’t understand the product Twitter was selling.

    The idea that you can simply hack away 80% of government employees & not end up causing great swathes of harm to people in the real world is for the birds.
    Well, that will be the interesting bit if Trump and Musk try to do it - and they may well.

    And if they do, that will provide a very high-profile case study for anyone like Farage who tries to do the same (or to advocate that it be done) elsewhere.
  • PhilPhil Posts: 2,239
    TimT said:

    HYUFD said:

    Farage: "This is the sexy bit: Elon comes in and takes a knife to the [US] deep state. Just like when he bought Twitter he sacked 80 per cent of the staff.

    There are going to be mass lay-offs, whole departments closing and I’m hoping and praying that’s the blueprint for what we then do on our side of the pond.

    Because that’s what Reform UK believes in - that we’re over-bureaucratised and none of it works. This assault on the bureaucratic state is the thing that’s really exciting."

    Really? That's what Reform voters want? 80% of the state slashed and burned.

    The Red Wallers he's after???

    I very much doubt it.

    Most Reform voters are either small businessmen, in the armed forces or white working class private sector workers. So I doubt they are that bothered about Farage promising to slash the civil service and public sector administrators as long as he doesn't also slash the numbers of police, soldiers and doctors and nurses
    This is such an idiotic take because if you cut "public sector administrators" you end up paying doctors and police officers to do admin tasks.
    But when you do that, guess what? Less admin is done vs more real work. Most admin is work for work’s sake, expanding to fill the space.

    For a real-life case, read Frederic Laloux’s Reinventing Organizations, and the Buurtzorg experience. He has other examples
    Admin work is real work. You can have too many administrators, just as you can have too many nurses, but this idea that admin work isn’t real work is just reactionary bullshit.

    Someone has to make sure the patients are going to come in at the right times, corral the support staff & do all the tracking that has to happen to make a service work. You can pay a consultant to do that work, compromising their healthcare output in the process. Or you can pay an administrator to do it, leaving the consultants to concentrate on doing the thing we actually pay them to do.

    I know which I would prefer.

    It’s notable that by comparison with European healthcare services, which generally now get better outcomes than the NHS (IIRC) the NHS has far fewer administrative staff. We need more admins & support staff (IT especially) in order to free up healthcare staff to do the thing we’re actually paying them to do: deliver healthcare.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 27,575
    HYUFD said:

    Farage: "This is the sexy bit: Elon comes in and takes a knife to the [US] deep state. Just like when he bought Twitter he sacked 80 per cent of the staff.

    There are going to be mass lay-offs, whole departments closing and I’m hoping and praying that’s the blueprint for what we then do on our side of the pond.

    Because that’s what Reform UK believes in - that we’re over-bureaucratised and none of it works. This assault on the bureaucratic state is the thing that’s really exciting."

    Really? That's what Reform voters want? 80% of the state slashed and burned.

    The Red Wallers he's after???

    I very much doubt it.

    Most Reform voters are either small businessmen, in the armed forces or white working class private sector workers. So I doubt they are that bothered about Farage promising to slash the civil service and public sector administrators as long as he doesn't also slash the numbers of police, soldiers and doctors and nurses
    Trouble is it is common knowledge on the right that the police have gone woke and the NHS is full of paper-pushers, so there is no reason to spare either.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,247

    HYUFD said:

    Farage: "This is the sexy bit: Elon comes in and takes a knife to the [US] deep state. Just like when he bought Twitter he sacked 80 per cent of the staff.

    There are going to be mass lay-offs, whole departments closing and I’m hoping and praying that’s the blueprint for what we then do on our side of the pond.

    Because that’s what Reform UK believes in - that we’re over-bureaucratised and none of it works. This assault on the bureaucratic state is the thing that’s really exciting."

    Really? That's what Reform voters want? 80% of the state slashed and burned.

    The Red Wallers he's after???

    I very much doubt it.

    Most Reform voters are either small businessmen, in the armed forces or white working class private sector workers. So I doubt they are that bothered about Farage promising to slash the civil service and public sector administrators as long as he doesn't also slash the numbers of police, soldiers and doctors and nurses
    This is such an idiotic take because if you cut "public sector administrators" you end up paying doctors and police officers to do admin tasks.
    I doubt most Reform voters care about that either
  • KnightOutKnightOut Posts: 134
    Andy_JS said:

    Phil said:

    Farage: "This is the sexy bit: Elon comes in and takes a knife to the [US] deep state. Just like when he bought Twitter he sacked 80 per cent of the staff.

    There are going to be mass lay-offs, whole departments closing and I’m hoping and praying that’s the blueprint for what we then do on our side of the pond.

    Because that’s what Reform UK believes in - that we’re over-bureaucratised and none of it works. This assault on the bureaucratic state is the thing that’s really exciting."

    Really? That's what Reform voters want? 80% of the state slashed and burned.

    The Red Wallers he's after???

    I very much doubt it.

    This is all very fascist obviously, but it’s also notable (to me) that Farage completely glosses over the reality that Musk sacked 80% of Twitter’s staff & as a result triggered an 84% drop in it’s revenue. He simply didn’t understand the product Twitter was selling.

    The idea that you can simply hack away 80% of government employees & not end up causing great swathes of harm to people in the real world is for the birds.
    All very fascist? I thought they were lovers of bureaucracy and the big state (provided it was putting their policies into action). The one thing they weren't was libertarian individualists like Musk.


    Another example of how the word 'fascist' has been debased and become essentially a synonym for 'people I dont' like'. Idiot shorthand for those who can't be bothered to think things through.

    Massively cutting the size of the state cannot, by definition, be fascistic because Fascism depends on a large and all-powerful state in order to enforce its fundamentally authoritarian ethos.

    And if we extend that logic, trimming the state would be seen as an admirable act of anti-Fascism. But logic is typically lost on the vacuous.
  • tpfkartpfkar Posts: 1,562

    Listening to Shelagh Fogerty on LBC she had a guy called Dan, a Brit from New Jersey, who claims NJ is going red. Previously a woman called Gemma from Britain who voted for Harris in NY says that her friends are all voting Trump. They are suggesting a Trump landslide based on the economy.

    William Glenn and Darkage have called this.

    If Gemma is from Britain, how did she vote in NY?
    You'll get very good odds on the likes of New Jersey going Republican. That doesn't mean it's hard to find Trump supporters there.
  • TimTTimT Posts: 6,456
    viewcode said:

    To: @MarqueeMark
    From: @viewcode

    Sir, I note your insistence that women predominantly vote for KH, and men for DJT. Do you have a source for this pleased based on a survey or some recorded fact?

    Latest NBC poll shows Harris winning women 57/41 and Trump winning men 58/40. All the polls are showing a big gender gap
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,426
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    Farage: "This is the sexy bit: Elon comes in and takes a knife to the [US] deep state. Just like when he bought Twitter he sacked 80 per cent of the staff.

    There are going to be mass lay-offs, whole departments closing and I’m hoping and praying that’s the blueprint for what we then do on our side of the pond.

    Because that’s what Reform UK believes in - that we’re over-bureaucratised and none of it works. This assault on the bureaucratic state is the thing that’s really exciting."

    Really? That's what Reform voters want? 80% of the state slashed and burned.

    The Red Wallers he's after???

    I very much doubt it.

    Most Reform voters are either small businessmen, in the armed forces or white working class private sector workers. So I doubt they are that bothered about Farage promising to slash the civil service and public sector administrators as long as he doesn't also slash the numbers of police, soldiers and doctors and nurses
    This is such an idiotic take because if you cut "public sector administrators" you end up paying doctors and police officers to do admin tasks.
    I doubt most Reform voters care about that either
    Only because dishonest politicians will lie to them about the answers being "easy" with no negative side effects.
  • LBC.I watched James O'Brien on mastermind once. He did not answer all the general knowledge questions correctly. I believed he knew it all. He does not.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 21,791

    viewcode said:

    viewcode said:

    Scott_xP said:

    Lines to vote in New Jersey. Apparently never happened before...

    Male or female? Somebody (@darkage?) mentioned NJ may fall in a Trump landslide. Are we talking Carmela Soprano or Christopher Moltisanti?
    LOL. Trump isn’t winning New Jersey.
    "Labour isn't winning Canterbury"
    LBC. Calls it everytime. It is time to throw in the towel.
    Is that sarcasm? Genuine question?
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 35,895
    @GayLaVie

    I have cautiously placed the emergency champagne in the refrigerator.

    https://x.com/GayLaVie/status/1853783816743145595
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 21,791
    TimT said:

    viewcode said:

    To: @MarqueeMark
    From: @viewcode

    Sir, I note your insistence that women predominantly vote for KH, and men for DJT. Do you have a source for this pleased based on a survey or some recorded fact?

    Latest NBC poll shows Harris winning women 57/41 and Trump winning men 58/40. All the polls are showing a big gender gap
    thank you
  • viewcode said:

    viewcode said:

    viewcode said:

    Scott_xP said:

    Lines to vote in New Jersey. Apparently never happened before...

    Male or female? Somebody (@darkage?) mentioned NJ may fall in a Trump landslide. Are we talking Carmela Soprano or Christopher Moltisanti?
    LOL. Trump isn’t winning New Jersey.
    "Labour isn't winning Canterbury"
    LBC. Calls it everytime. It is time to throw in the towel.
    Is that sarcasm? Genuine question?
    Sarcasm. Brian Hays was good. I do not like the current crop of presenters there now.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 41,947
    Stocky said:

    The Rest Is Politics Livestream: America Decides, 8pm, YouTube clashes with Bake Off so what the fuck are you going to do @kinabalu eh?

    It's tough but not that tough. Bake Off.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 27,575
    MP mugged by gang who snatched mobile phone
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1dpeyqk4x4o

    Chris Webb MP, Labour, Blackpool South.
  • DriverDriver Posts: 4,782
    eek said:

    Sandpit said:

    eek said:

    Sandpit said:

    I have a slightly different take on Musk buying twitter. I don't really buy the free speech absolutism, same as the eco-warrior spin on EV cars.

    I think he saw a bloated company that never really made any money and thought he could low ball his way into buying it. At worst he gets a company that ticks along, but on the upside, data. Remember he was an early investor in OpenAI, so he is well aware of the power of data, LLMs, etc.

    But he screwed up over the amount he paid and then was forced to radical cost cutting. But at the same time, he has got sucked down into the twitter rabbit hole, which made things worse, in terms of keeping advertisers happy. And he is a weird dude, who when criticised he fires from the hip unwisely.

    It is worth pointing out, quietly he cut off every bodies elses access to twitter data, formed a spin off and recently set up a 100k GPU cluster....I think that was the original plan all along.

    Musk was on Rogan’s podcast yesterday. They spend half the time talking about politics and the other half talking about various forms of technology.

    Musk says that he primarily wanted a platform with freedom of speech, he didn’t see why he needed tens of thousands of content censors, hadn’t banked on organised advertising boycotts, admits he way overpaid but that it was worth it for the greater good of humanity!
    If he doesn't understand the need for content censors he's not running it for the greater good of humanity...
    He didn’t see the need for tens of thousands of them proactively deleting posts and banning people, no. Twitter’s staff numbers had doubled during the pandemic.
    That's the problem with running a social media network - you need to employ a lot of people to moderate what dubious people want to post..
    The trouble is how to do that without doing it in a politically-biased way, as pre-Musk Twitter did.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,247
    edited November 5
    HYUFD said:

    Pulpstar said:

    viewcode said:

    Listening to Shelagh Fogerty on LBC she had a guy called Dan, a Brit from New Jersey, who claims NJ is going red. Previously a woman called Gemma from Britain who voted for Harris in NY says that her friends are all voting Trump. They are suggesting a Trump landslide based on the economy.

    William Glenn has called this.

    Damn
    Just imagine if New Jersey and Virginia went red with Iowa and Kansas blue.

    Just hold that thought for one second.
    I think more likely is NJ and Virginia are much closer but narrow Harris wins still but Iowa and Kansas are also closer but Iowa goes for Harris and Kansas still goes Trump. So main impact is boost for Trump in popular vote as former 2 are more populous but boost for Harris in EC with Iowa
    Based on early votes and mail ins Democrats ahead 59% to 21% for GOP in NJ and 50% to 38% for the GOP in Virginia.

    Dems tied 39% each with GOP in Iowa but GOP ahead in Kansas 52% to 33%.

    Republicans also ahead on early votes in Nevada, Arizona, Georgia and by 1% in NC. Democrats ahead on early votes in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin with Michigan tied.

    Though the Research Michigan poll had fewer 2020 Biden voters voting Trump than 2020 Trump voters voting Harris with Harris leading with Independents in Michigan (whereas in Pennsylvania more 2020 Biden voters are voting Trump than 2020 Trump voters voting Harris albeit Harris still had a 1% lead there overall)

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-elections/early-vote

    https://researchco.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Tables_USStates_04Nov2024.pdf
  • viewcode said:

    viewcode said:

    viewcode said:

    Scott_xP said:

    Lines to vote in New Jersey. Apparently never happened before...

    Male or female? Somebody (@darkage?) mentioned NJ may fall in a Trump landslide. Are we talking Carmela Soprano or Christopher Moltisanti?
    LOL. Trump isn’t winning New Jersey.
    "Labour isn't winning Canterbury"
    LBC. Calls it everytime. It is time to throw in the towel.
    Is that sarcasm? Genuine question?
    Sarcasm. Brian Hays was good. I do not like the current crop of presenters there now.
    Brian Haynes.
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 18,080
    The turnout in US Presidential elections hasn't been above 70% since 1900 (73.7%). The highest turnout was 82.6% in 1876. The turnout last time was the highest since 1900 at 66.6%

    I don't see any bets on turnout percentage, but if it's up on last time then the bets on a high vote tally for both candidates look pretty good. Harris is 4/7 to receive 80+ million votes, and Trump is 4/6.

    Last time Biden received 81 million votes and Trump 74 million. Do your own research...
  • LeonLeon Posts: 54,672

    Leon said:

    Andy_JS said:

    Haven't been on ChatGPT for about a year, so I thought I'd see if they've improved their factual information replies.

    They haven't.

    My question: "How many votes did the Conservatives poll in the Huntingdon constituency at the 1983 general election?"

    Answer: "In the 1983 UK general election, the Conservative Party candidate in the Huntingdon constituency, John Major, received 32,833 votes, winning with 54.2% of the vote. This was a strong performance in a safe Conservative seat, marking the beginning of a prominent political career for Major, who would later become Prime Minister."

    In fact he polled 34,254 votes at that election.

    Claude 3.6’s answer:

    “Since this is a very specific historical electoral statistic from a single constituency, I should note that while I try to be accurate, I may hallucinate specific numbers like this. The Conservatives won Huntingdon in 1983 (with John Major as their candidate), but I don't want to state a specific vote total without being completely certain of the figure. I'd recommend checking official electoral records or the BBC's historical election database for the exact number.”

    Admirable self-awareness
    Stop talking about AI, you know the rules.
    PB will be left sadly uneducated, but fair enough in this instance

    Here’s a photo of Gyeong-ju



    I love and hate Korea all at the same time. It has really annoying rules - no booze without food! - enforced by quite odd people, but at the right moment it enchants. It is, in other words, PB turned into a nation, with a similarly ageing population
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,270
    edited November 5

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    The no booze without food thing does get really old very quickly, in Korea

    Also it’s near impossible to buy Tabasco in central Seoul

    These tiny things begin to grate

    What's the point in being rich if you can't order both - then not touch the food?
    I’ve found a really cool little Taiwanese sort-of izakaya and I’m having Taiwanese food ordered from a special ipad and using my iPhone to translate with photos

    It’s all tremendous fun and Korea is brilliant
    Never been yet. It's on the list.

    Although it look like Mauritania first...
    Be careful. It is one of the dodgier places in North Africa to travel to. A few friends have worked there and do not have a good opinion of the place.
    Why is that? Know nothing about the place
    Its a poor country where Islamic extremists are rife. Western contractors heading to the rigs were/are taken to the hotels and told to stay in their rooms with the lights off as Extremists drive up and down outside the hotels at night looking for occupied rooms so they can kidnap foreigners. The nearest consular help is in Senegal and the same applies to hospital treatment (if you want to survive).
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 54,314

    Phil said:

    Farage: "This is the sexy bit: Elon comes in and takes a knife to the [US] deep state. Just like when he bought Twitter he sacked 80 per cent of the staff.

    There are going to be mass lay-offs, whole departments closing and I’m hoping and praying that’s the blueprint for what we then do on our side of the pond.

    Because that’s what Reform UK believes in - that we’re over-bureaucratised and none of it works. This assault on the bureaucratic state is the thing that’s really exciting."

    Really? That's what Reform voters want? 80% of the state slashed and burned.

    The Red Wallers he's after???

    I very much doubt it.

    This is all very fascist obviously, but it’s also notable (to me) that Farage completely glosses over the reality that Musk sacked 80% of Twitter’s staff & as a result triggered an 84% drop in it’s revenue. He simply didn’t understand the product Twitter was selling.

    The idea that you can simply hack away 80% of government employees & not end up causing great swathes of harm to people in the real world is for the birds.
    Well, that will be the interesting bit if Trump and Musk try to do it - and they may well.

    And if they do, that will provide a very high-profile case study for anyone like Farage who tries to do the same (or to advocate that it be done) elsewhere.
    I’d suggest that the British State is considerably more efficient than the American Federal government, which currently has a budget north of $6trn despite a lot of devolution. So much of the US is in hock to vested interests and lobbyists, in a way that isn’t the case almost anywhere else. See discussions about American healthcare ad nauseam on here.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 49,586

    TimT said:

    HYUFD said:

    Farage: "This is the sexy bit: Elon comes in and takes a knife to the [US] deep state. Just like when he bought Twitter he sacked 80 per cent of the staff.

    There are going to be mass lay-offs, whole departments closing and I’m hoping and praying that’s the blueprint for what we then do on our side of the pond.

    Because that’s what Reform UK believes in - that we’re over-bureaucratised and none of it works. This assault on the bureaucratic state is the thing that’s really exciting."

    Really? That's what Reform voters want? 80% of the state slashed and burned.

    The Red Wallers he's after???

    I very much doubt it.

    Most Reform voters are either small businessmen, in the armed forces or white working class private sector workers. So I doubt they are that bothered about Farage promising to slash the civil service and public sector administrators as long as he doesn't also slash the numbers of police, soldiers and doctors and nurses
    This is such an idiotic take because if you cut "public sector administrators" you end up paying doctors and police officers to do admin tasks.
    But when you do that, guess what? Less admin is done vs more real work. Most admin is work for work’s sake, expanding to fill the space.
    That's just not true at all. Management consultancy bollocks.
    Nope - at CitiGroup, for example, pre 2008 they had floors of people who went to meetings to write PowerPoints to present at other meetings to….

    In 2008, a manager was shouting, can anyone tell me out exposure to Lehmans ? Literally. One bloke put his hand up - a contractor from my company. The rest knew nothing..

    After 2008, they were firing by the floor…

    All organisations go through this. They accumulate bullshit like dust.
  • HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    Farage: "This is the sexy bit: Elon comes in and takes a knife to the [US] deep state. Just like when he bought Twitter he sacked 80 per cent of the staff.

    There are going to be mass lay-offs, whole departments closing and I’m hoping and praying that’s the blueprint for what we then do on our side of the pond.

    Because that’s what Reform UK believes in - that we’re over-bureaucratised and none of it works. This assault on the bureaucratic state is the thing that’s really exciting."

    Really? That's what Reform voters want? 80% of the state slashed and burned.

    The Red Wallers he's after???

    I very much doubt it.

    Most Reform voters are either small businessmen, in the armed forces or white working class private sector workers. So I doubt they are that bothered about Farage promising to slash the civil service and public sector administrators as long as he doesn't also slash the numbers of police, soldiers and doctors and nurses
    This is such an idiotic take because if you cut "public sector administrators" you end up paying doctors and police officers to do admin tasks.
    I doubt most Reform voters care about that either
    They do care about Weatherspoons.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 27,575

    viewcode said:

    viewcode said:

    viewcode said:

    Scott_xP said:

    Lines to vote in New Jersey. Apparently never happened before...

    Male or female? Somebody (@darkage?) mentioned NJ may fall in a Trump landslide. Are we talking Carmela Soprano or Christopher Moltisanti?
    LOL. Trump isn’t winning New Jersey.
    "Labour isn't winning Canterbury"
    LBC. Calls it everytime. It is time to throw in the towel.
    Is that sarcasm? Genuine question?
    Sarcasm. Brian Hays was good. I do not like the current crop of presenters there now.
    Brian Haynes.
    Brian Hayes.
  • StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 8,095

    Super interesting video (first 20 mins)

    The Hidden Crisis in the UK Economy
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7po69QCHVs

    Which is backed up experience of this guy building a company

    From ROUGH School to $800 Million CEO?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbXmojTTzEk

    It's going to have to wait it's turn whilst we deal with the unhidden ones.
    The last 2 weeks have been good for him

    On 19 October the Telegraph described him as ceo of a $500m startup.

    (But it’s all paper money anyway)
Sign In or Register to comment.