politicalbetting
Home› General

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register

Categories

Could the Conservatives Really Come Third? – politicalbetting.com

SystemSystem Posts: 12,162
edited June 16 in General
Could the Conservatives Really Come Third? – politicalbetting.com

Political earthquakes are infrequent, but they do happen.

Read the full story here

«134567…17

Comments

  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,153
    First! First! First!
  • eekeek Posts: 28,369
    edited June 7
    Posts to which the answer is Yes...

    I assume you mean most seats without Labour...

    I still think Reform 0 seats is a better bet (9/2)
  • DM_AndyDM_Andy Posts: 1,127
    Could? Yes. Will? I still don't believe it.
  • DumbosaurusDumbosaurus Posts: 795
    Reform is currently 5.25-7.25 on the spreads.

    That's a great sell with someone else's money.

    I'm hoping though we go crazy and it gets up to 20 or something so the risk of selling it is worth it with [b]my[/b] money.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,153
    FWIW, the 3-1 on the LibDems to come second doesn't appeal to me. That seems generous for a party which is hovering around the 10% mark.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,654
    If they work hard and don’t make any more unforced mistakes, but it won’t be easy.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,625
    kinabalu said:

    Just to say, I don't want a humungous Labour majority at the price of empowering Farage. I'll take the vanilla landslide.

    The realignment of British politics will take two stages:

    - Stage One: Destroy the Tories and give Labour a big majority with gains for the Lib Dems and Reform
    - Stage Two: Destroy the Labour Party and re-establish a Liberal vs right-wing two-party system
  • londonpubmanlondonpubman Posts: 3,639
    CON in absolutely desperate trouble now

    3rd or indeed 4th in terms of seats a real possibility
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,921
    edited June 7
    Now of course the Canadian Conservatives are heading back to power on current polls under Poilievre and Scottish Labour are set to win most seats in Scotland again and take lots of SNP seats. So even a massive landslide defeat does not prevent you winning again once the pendulum turns.

    Though under FPTP a split right won't win, hence the Canadian Conservatives had to merge with the Canadian Reform Party to form today's Conservative Party of Canada to have a chance of government again. Under PR centre right and populist right parties can stand separate candidates still and both win seats and come together again to try and form a government after the election, as they now do in Italy, Sweden, Israel, New Zealand, the Netherlands and Spain for example.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,153
    Dumbosaurus said:

    Reform is currently 5.25-7.25 on the spreads.

    That's a great sell with someone else's money.

    I'm hoping though we go crazy and it gets up to 20 or something so the risk of selling it is worth it with [b]my[/b] money.

    I think that's a buy, because it's very asymmetrical risk-reward. Yep, the median outcome is probably 1 or 2 seats. But the Conservatives keep tripping over their feet, then it's far from impossible that they and the Conservatives end up in the high teens, in which case 30, 40 or even 60 seats is possible. (See Canada 1993.)
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,405
    rcs1000 said:

    First! First! First!

    Mark 9:35
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,921
    williamglenn said:

    kinabalu said:

    Just to say, I don't want a humungous Labour majority at the price of empowering Farage. I'll take the vanilla landslide.

    The realignment of British politics will take two stages:

    - Stage One: Destroy the Tories and give Labour a big majority with gains for the Lib Dems and Reform
    - Stage Two: Destroy the Labour Party and re-establish a Liberal vs right-wing two-party system
    Unless Corbynites take over Labour again hard to see the LDs having any chance of being the main party of the centre left again
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,625
    Incidentally, did everyone know that Ed Davey was a hero?

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/ed-davey-the-night-i-pulled-a-woman-from-the-tracks-as-a-train-hurtled-towards-us-7534767.html

    Ed Davey: 'The night I pulled a woman from the tracks as a train hurtled towards us'
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,153
    williamglenn said:

    Incidentally, did everyone know that Ed Davey was a hero?

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/ed-davey-the-night-i-pulled-a-woman-from-the-tracks-as-a-train-hurtled-towards-us-7534767.html

    Ed Davey: 'The night I pulled a woman from the tracks as a train hurtled towards us'

    Who?
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,553
    The Tories certainly won't come third in terms of seats. Vote share is more of a possibility.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,153
    Alanbrooke said:

    rcs1000 said:

    First! First! First!

    Mark 9:35
    "Let he who is without sin cast the first bet"?
  • nico679nico679 Posts: 6,275
    Maybe tonight’s debate might have some fireworks and push D Day Gate off tomorrows front pages .

    Mordaunt might do well and help her own chances .

  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,153
    Andy_JS said:

    The Tories certainly won't come third in terms of seats. Vote share is more of a possibility.

    You can sell that at 1.4 on Betfair if you're certain.
  • PedestrianRockPedestrianRock Posts: 580
    rcs1000 said:

    FWIW, the 3-1 on the LibDems to come second doesn't appeal to me. That seems generous for a party which is hovering around the 10% mark.

    their vote is much more efficient though than REFUK
  • boulayboulay Posts: 5,486
    They can come third, however the way this election has gone so far anything could happen. The king dies and there’s a delay and the time and prominence of Rishi (obvs he will duck out of the wake but do the funeral) helps the Tories. A big row could blow up with Labour discipline between far left candidates getting high on the impending landslide so think they can say whatever they want.

    The manifestos could be analysed by political journalists between gossiping and someone might notice a fatal flaw.

    Taylor Swift might get jiggy with Ed Dave’s who smashes the youth vote.

    But otherwise likelihood is Tories recovering to a poor second and Labour romping home like Seabiscuit.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,553
    edited June 7
    rcs1000 said:

    Andy_JS said:

    The Tories certainly won't come third in terms of seats. Vote share is more of a possibility.

    You can sell that at 1.4 on Betfair if you're certain.
    I am pretty certain of it. Betfair punters proving they don't know what they're doing wrt particular market. They aren't going to go below 75 seats and that'll be enough for second place.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,625
    HYUFD said:

    williamglenn said:

    kinabalu said:

    Just to say, I don't want a humungous Labour majority at the price of empowering Farage. I'll take the vanilla landslide.

    The realignment of British politics will take two stages:

    - Stage One: Destroy the Tories and give Labour a big majority with gains for the Lib Dems and Reform
    - Stage Two: Destroy the Labour Party and re-establish a Liberal vs right-wing two-party system
    Unless Corbynites take over Labour again hard to see the LDs having any chance of being the main party of the centre left again
    You're thinking in terms of the previous divide. Perhaps think of it as Anglo-Saxon England (Lib Dems) vs Danelaw England (Reform).
  • MattWMattW Posts: 23,148
    rcs1000 said:

    williamglenn said:

    Incidentally, did everyone know that Ed Davey was a hero?

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/ed-davey-the-night-i-pulled-a-woman-from-the-tracks-as-a-train-hurtled-towards-us-7534767.html

    Ed Davey: 'The night I pulled a woman from the tracks as a train hurtled towards us'

    Who?
    It beats the Nick Cleggover narrative,

    "The 30th night I pulled a woman from ... something something something."
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,070
    rcs1000 said:

    First! First! First!

    That's exceedingly unlikely.
    It's not impossible they scrape second, I suppose.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,625
    rcs1000 said:

    williamglenn said:

    Incidentally, did everyone know that Ed Davey was a hero?

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/ed-davey-the-night-i-pulled-a-woman-from-the-tracks-as-a-train-hurtled-towards-us-7534767.html

    Ed Davey: 'The night I pulled a woman from the tracks as a train hurtled towards us'

    Who?
    Just some random woman.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 35,990
    Richi is lucky this hasn't happened to him. yet.

    @BidensWins

    BREAKING: President Biden just released this campaign ad slamming Donald Trump for knowing nothing about patriotism, service or sacrifice. Retweet so all Americans know how un-American Donald Trump really is.

    https://x.com/BidensWins/status/1799113515648897096
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,070
    williamglenn said:

    kinabalu said:

    Just to say, I don't want a humungous Labour majority at the price of empowering Farage. I'll take the vanilla landslide.

    The realignment of British politics will take two stages:

    - Stage One: Destroy the Tories and give Labour a big majority with gains for the Lib Dems and Reform
    - Stage Two: Destroy the Labour Party and re-establish a Liberal vs right-wing two-party system
    Stage 3, PR.
  • boulayboulay Posts: 5,486
    williamglenn said:

    Incidentally, did everyone know that Ed Davey was a hero?

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/ed-davey-the-night-i-pulled-a-woman-from-the-tracks-as-a-train-hurtled-towards-us-7534767.html

    Ed Davey: 'The night I pulled a woman from the tracks as a train hurtled towards us'

    Makes me think of this.


  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,153
    PedestrianRock said:

    rcs1000 said:

    FWIW, the 3-1 on the LibDems to come second doesn't appeal to me. That seems generous for a party which is hovering around the 10% mark.

    their vote is much more efficient though than REFUK
    Sure it is.

    But I think in the event of Con-Reform crossover, then it is far from impossible that Reform gets 50 seats, while the Conservatives get a dozen or less.
  • PedestrianRockPedestrianRock Posts: 580
    I have been betting and tipping on this market all week and emphatically agree. I was heavy on it (and the Lib Dems in the same market) initially as a trading bet but I’m contemplating holding them till the end more and more.

    On seat total, the Lib Dems (4.1) are better placed but REFUK (14.0) might still be better value.

    However I am less keen on the vote share bet just because REFUK ended up with about 100 fewer candidates in the end I think, which might hurt their chances a good chunk. Odds don’t look as appealing.

  • DM_AndyDM_Andy Posts: 1,127
    FPT:
    BatteryCorrectHorse said:



    Official Labour Party poster.

    Seems like it's not, it's a mockup done by Ben Golik
    https://x.com/bengolik/status/1799051343027728469
    An advertising mockup with the headline He left them on the beaches, with a silhouette of a small figure of Rishi Sunak running away.
  • MattWMattW Posts: 23,148
    rcs1000 said:

    First! First! First!

    Thank-you for the header.

    I wonder what level the Reform / Farage ceiling of vote share is at?

    (BTW just to make sure you are aware: I sent you a possible header for the weekend earlier via PM. Up to you whether to us it, but it is at least as brilliant as any by @TSE , without the puns.)
  • PedestrianRockPedestrianRock Posts: 580
    rcs1000 said:

    PedestrianRock said:

    rcs1000 said:

    FWIW, the 3-1 on the LibDems to come second doesn't appeal to me. That seems generous for a party which is hovering around the 10% mark.

    their vote is much more efficient though than REFUK
    Sure it is.

    But I think in the event of Con-Reform crossover, then it is far from impossible that Reform gets 50 seats, while the Conservatives get a dozen or less.
    That’s a good point. Crossover could catapult them ahead of the Lib Dem’s under the right circumstances.

    I’m heavily in on both and unsure whether to pivot to backing one horse or the other, or just to stay relatively evenly split.
  • SeaShantyIrish2SeaShantyIrish2 Posts: 17,559
    rcs1000 said:

    Alanbrooke said:

    rcs1000 said:

    First! First! First!

    Mark 9:35
    "Let he who is without sin cast the first bet"?
    Was this what Jesus said to the Roman soldiers dividing his garments by casting lots? (See Matthew 27:35)
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,625
    rcs1000 said:

    PedestrianRock said:

    rcs1000 said:

    FWIW, the 3-1 on the LibDems to come second doesn't appeal to me. That seems generous for a party which is hovering around the 10% mark.

    their vote is much more efficient though than REFUK
    Sure it is.

    But I think in the event of Con-Reform crossover, then it is far from impossible that Reform gets 50 seats, while the Conservatives get a dozen or less.
    Yes, vote efficiency isn't a linear function. Their vote might be incredibly inefficient up to around 15% but then suddenly you'll find that seats fall to them all over the place.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,153
    DM_Andy said:

    FPT:

    BatteryCorrectHorse said:



    Official Labour Party poster.

    Seems like it's not, it's a mockup done by Ben Golik
    https://x.com/bengolik/status/1799051343027728469
    An advertising mockup with the headline He left them on the beaches, with a silhouette of a small figure of Rishi Sunak running away.
    You know, I think a more effective advert would manage to combine small boats full of migrants landing on UK beaches and his skipping the D Day event.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,153
    MattW said:

    rcs1000 said:

    First! First! First!

    Thank-you for the header.

    I wonder what level the Reform / Farage ceiling of vote share is at?

    (BTW just to make sure you are aware: I sent you a possible header for the weekend earlier via PM. Up to you whether to us it, but it is at least as brilliant as any by @TSE , without the puns.)
    Ah, could you email it to me. It's my username at gmail.
  • nico679nico679 Posts: 6,275
    Sky News are reporting a poll conducted today .

    75% of over 65s thought it was somewhat or completely unacceptable that Sunak left early .

    Overall 65% polled said the same . Only 8% thought it acceptable .
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 10,061
    Afternoon all, back from an afternoon with the other Woolies. Safe to say he's arsed this up royally. A very angry Pa Woolie and big Sis woolie just utterly gobsmacked at what he'd done, cannot understand how, why or what on earth he thought he'd gain from it. She's not particularly news savvy but had heard this this morning (in contrast when I mentioned milkshake girl later on she said 'huh? Who? What?)
    What an utter prick of a man
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,553
    edited June 7
    Candidates in Starmer's seat, Holborn & St Pancras.

    "Brick, Nick the Incredible Flying - The Official Monster Raving Loony Party
    Clinton, Charlie - Liberal Democrats
    Feinstein, Andrew Josef - no description
    Islam, Wais - Independent
    Kumar, Senthil - Independent
    Malik, Mehreen - The Conservative Party Candidate
    Poynton, John Edmund - UK Independence Party
    Roberts, David - Reform UK
    Scripps, Tom - Socialist Equality Party
    Smith, Bobby Elmo - no description
    Stansell, David Robert - Green Party
    Starmer, Keir - Labour Party"

    https://www.camden.gov.uk/documents/d/guest/notice-of-poll-and-sits-of-ps-holborn-and-st-pancras-1
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,070
    It's not impossible that the seven dwarfs debate might decide the outcome of this.
    But Farage seems less likely to rhetorically destroy his opponents than vice versa.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,153
    MattW said:

    rcs1000 said:

    First! First! First!

    Thank-you for the header.

    I wonder what level the Reform / Farage ceiling of vote share is at?

    (BTW just to make sure you are aware: I sent you a possible header for the weekend earlier via PM. Up to you whether to us it, but it is at least as brilliant as any by @TSE , without the puns.)
    As far as ceiling goes: well I think the answer is that if the Conservative Party didn't exist, then half its voters would go to Reform, a quarter wouldn't vote, and most of the remaining quarter would go LibDem (with a few Labour thrown in there for good measure). Of course, the Conservative Party does exist, and some voters will never switch, so the current ceiling is probably about 25%.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,153
    Nigelb said:

    It's not impossible that the seven dwarfs debate might decide the outcome of this.
    But Farage seems less likely to rhetorically destroy his opponents than vice versa.

    I think a lot depends on if he has a couple of pints to calm his nerves before the debate...
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,553
    Confirmation of no Tory candidate in Rotherham.

    It was going to be Laila Cunningham (of Kensington and Bayswater) but she withdrew her nomination for some reason.

    https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https://www.rotherham.gov.uk/downloads/file/3885/statement-of-person-nominated-and-notice-of-poll-for-rotherham&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,153
    Andy_JS said:

    Confirmation of no Tory candidate in Rotherham.

    It was going to be Laila Cunningham (of Kensington and Bayswater) but she withdrew her nomination for some reason.

    https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https://www.rotherham.gov.uk/downloads/file/3885/statement-of-person-nominated-and-notice-of-poll-for-rotherham&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK

    Did the Conservatives find a candidate for Hemel Hempstead in the end?
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,083
    They could. They won't, but it may be closer than they like.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,070
    rcs1000 said:

    Nigelb said:

    It's not impossible that the seven dwarfs debate might decide the outcome of this.
    But Farage seems less likely to rhetorically destroy his opponents than vice versa.

    I think a lot depends on if he has a couple of pints to calm his nerves before the debate...
    ... or eight.
  • SeaShantyIrish2SeaShantyIrish2 Posts: 17,559
    So is there confirmation yet re: the full list of UK GE 2024 candidates?

    And if so, is it posted on web somewhere?
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,083
    7 candidates in my constituency, including 2 independent candidates. Fantastic stuff, last time we only had 4 total.

    No fringe parties unfortunately (unless one counts Green or Reform).
  • maaarshmaaarsh Posts: 3,590
    williamglenn said:

    rcs1000 said:

    PedestrianRock said:

    rcs1000 said:

    FWIW, the 3-1 on the LibDems to come second doesn't appeal to me. That seems generous for a party which is hovering around the 10% mark.

    their vote is much more efficient though than REFUK
    Sure it is.

    But I think in the event of Con-Reform crossover, then it is far from impossible that Reform gets 50 seats, while the Conservatives get a dozen or less.
    Yes, vote efficiency isn't a linear function. Their vote might be incredibly inefficient up to around 15% but then suddenly you'll find that seats fall to them all over the place.
    Playing around on some of the seat projection calculators, consolidating the entire Tory/Reform vote either way and Reform got slightly more seats overall - clearly predictive power of those models will be awful at such extremes but confirms the point - their vote is only inefficient until it hits a tipping point.
  • SeaShantyIrish2SeaShantyIrish2 Posts: 17,559
    wooliedyed said:

    Afternoon all, back from an afternoon with the other Woolies. Safe to say he's arsed this up royally. A very angry Pa Woolie and big Sis woolie just utterly gobsmacked at what he'd done, cannot understand how, why or what on earth he thought he'd gain from it. She's not particularly news savvy but had heard this this morning (in contrast when I mentioned milkshake girl later on she said 'huh? Who? What?)
    What an utter prick of a man

    Sunak did apologize, like you said he should. Does that cut any ice with you & yours?
  • eekeek Posts: 28,369
    rcs1000 said:

    Andy_JS said:

    Confirmation of no Tory candidate in Rotherham.

    It was going to be Laila Cunningham (of Kensington and Bayswater) but she withdrew her nomination for some reason.

    https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https://www.rotherham.gov.uk/downloads/file/3885/statement-of-person-nominated-and-notice-of-poll-for-rotherham&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK

    Did the Conservatives find a candidate for Hemel Hempstead in the end?
    Yes the former Tory party council leader - Andrew Williams

    See https://x.com/tomorrowsmps/status/1799084840295489729

    In theory a safe Tory seat, in reality I suspect the Lib Dems could grab it..
  • Peter_the_PunterPeter_the_Punter Posts: 14,324
    @eek FPT

    Well thanks for the heads-up on the Reform Candidate in Tewkesbury. I've been watching out for that on two Sites but neither showed it. This is of some significance for me and other punters.

    A few days ago I put the LDs up as a bet at 7/1 but stressed this should be a lot shorter if Ref stood. It's now 5/1 with a couple of firms and 9/2 with Lads and if you are right (I'm sure you are) that is stonking value. As you shrewdly observed, the nice Labour lady is from Kent and looks no more than a token candidate who will one day be offered a more promising opportunity. The LD candidate assures me that 'Labour is nowhere' and the Yellow team is running them perilously close. This is all before Mr Sunak's half day out at the seaside.

    As always, DYOR, but this looks a good one to me.
  • MattWMattW Posts: 23,148
    rottenborough said:


    Oliver Pridmore
    @OliverPridmore

    NEW: The final list of general election candidates are being published and something rather strange has cropped up for Broxtowe.

    Dr John Doddy, a Conservative member of Nottinghamshire County Council, is running as an independent against his party's candidate - Darren Henry.

    https://x.com/OliverPridmore

    That looks like a can of worms.

    Whistle blowers at his Medical Centre by the looks of it, Darren Henry being the husband of the defenestrated-by-voters Police and Crime Commissioner. All sorts of possibilities and reasons for him standing, in addition to the normal ones.

    https://hickinglanemedicalcentre.co.uk/

  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,083
    Andy_JS said:

    Confirmation of no Tory candidate in Rotherham.

    It was going to be Laila Cunningham (of Kensington and Bayswater) but she withdrew her nomination for some reason.

    https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https://www.rotherham.gov.uk/downloads/file/3885/statement-of-person-nominated-and-notice-of-poll-for-rotherham&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK

    Inexcusable for a major party not to be able to find someone. It's not like you need to find someone who lives in the area to stand, and even at short notice getting 10 people to propose any old duffer you name should not be impossible.
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 10,061
    Do we know how many seats Reform made in the end? Crick said 520 to 590 region (85 to 90%)
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,070
    This is getting ridiculous.

    Clarence Thomas has YET AGAIN amended his financial disclosure form ONLY AFTER getting caught by ProPublica. Thomas must RESIGN.
    https://x.com/MuellerSheWrote/status/1799124842115113338
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,553
    edited June 7
    wooliedyed said:

    Do we know how many seats Reform made in the end? Crick said 520 to 590 region (85 to 90%)

    I've noticed two so far, in East Grinstead and Cheltenham.

    https://www.midsussex.gov.uk/media/uxintccw/east-grinstead-and-uckfield-sopn-nop.pdf
    https://www.cheltenham.gov.uk/info/17/elections_and_voting/1834/statement_of_persons_nominated_and_notice_of_poll_for_the_uk_parliamentary_election_july_2024
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,083
    maaarsh said:

    williamglenn said:

    rcs1000 said:

    PedestrianRock said:

    rcs1000 said:

    FWIW, the 3-1 on the LibDems to come second doesn't appeal to me. That seems generous for a party which is hovering around the 10% mark.

    their vote is much more efficient though than REFUK
    Sure it is.

    But I think in the event of Con-Reform crossover, then it is far from impossible that Reform gets 50 seats, while the Conservatives get a dozen or less.
    Yes, vote efficiency isn't a linear function. Their vote might be incredibly inefficient up to around 15% but then suddenly you'll find that seats fall to them all over the place.
    Playing around on some of the seat projection calculators, consolidating the entire Tory/Reform vote either way and Reform got slightly more seats overall - clearly predictive power of those models will be awful at such extremes but confirms the point - their vote is only inefficient until it hits a tipping point.
    UKIP always seemed to have the strategy of getting enough votes total even with little ground game that they reached the tipping point where they would suddenly get a whole bunch of seats, as contrasted with the Green strategy of hyper targeting certain areas to get a few MPs despite a low overall percentage.

    UKIP didn't quite make it, but Reform have a shot at breaking through in several places, even if dreams of replacing the Tories may not come to fruition.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,369
    edited June 7
    Peter_the_Punter said:

    @eek FPT

    Well thanks for the heads-up on the Reform Candidate in Tewkesbury. I've been watching out for that on two Sites but neither showed it. This is of some significance for me and other punters.

    A few days ago I put the LDs up as a bet at 7/1 but stressed this should be a lot shorter if Ref stood. It's now 5/1 with a couple of firms and 9/2 with Lads and if you are right (I'm sure you are) that is stonking value. As you shrewdly observed, the nice Labour lady is from Kent and looks no more than a token candidate who will one day be offered a more promising opportunity. The LD candidate assures me that 'Labour is nowhere' and the Yellow team is running them perilously close. This is all before Mr Sunak's half day out at the seaside.

    As always, DYOR, but this looks a good one to me.

    I grabbed it at 5-1 because by the time I saw your post the 7/1 had gone to 9/2.

  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,921
    rcs1000 said:

    Andy_JS said:

    Confirmation of no Tory candidate in Rotherham.

    It was going to be Laila Cunningham (of Kensington and Bayswater) but she withdrew her nomination for some reason.

    https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https://www.rotherham.gov.uk/downloads/file/3885/statement-of-person-nominated-and-notice-of-poll-for-rotherham&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK

    Did the Conservatives find a candidate for Hemel Hempstead in the end?
    Not quite sure what happened there, Jaymey McIvor who was the candidate is an Epping Forest councillor
  • Peter_the_PunterPeter_the_Punter Posts: 14,324
    rcs1000 said:

    FWIW, the 3-1 on the LibDems to come second doesn't appeal to me. That seems generous for a party which is hovering around the 10% mark.

    You thought they were a sell on the spreads when they were on 36, Robert. I agreed with you, so I've got nothing to shout about, but I can't see this Tory collapse as anything but good news for the Yellow Peril.

    I'm on.
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 10,061
    SeaShantyIrish2 said:

    wooliedyed said:

    Afternoon all, back from an afternoon with the other Woolies. Safe to say he's arsed this up royally. A very angry Pa Woolie and big Sis woolie just utterly gobsmacked at what he'd done, cannot understand how, why or what on earth he thought he'd gain from it. She's not particularly news savvy but had heard this this morning (in contrast when I mentioned milkshake girl later on she said 'huh? Who? What?)
    What an utter prick of a man

    Sunak did apologize, like you said he should. Does that cut any ice with you & yours?
    I did not say he should apologise as far as I can recall? Not really though is the answer, it's no different to Brown rocking up at Mrs Duffy's door, damage done. I mean it's better than him saying 'yeah? And?' But its done now, and the more I think on it the more he clearly cannot be arsed. He needs to make way for someone who cares.
  • DM_AndyDM_Andy Posts: 1,127
    HYUFD said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Andy_JS said:

    Confirmation of no Tory candidate in Rotherham.

    It was going to be Laila Cunningham (of Kensington and Bayswater) but she withdrew her nomination for some reason.

    https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https://www.rotherham.gov.uk/downloads/file/3885/statement-of-person-nominated-and-notice-of-poll-for-rotherham&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK

    Did the Conservatives find a candidate for Hemel Hempstead in the end?
    Not quite sure what happened there, Jaymey McIvor who was the candidate is an Epping Forest councillor
    He got Russell-Moyled earlier today, lots of discussion in the previous thread. No-one knows what the allegation is.

  • maaarshmaaarsh Posts: 3,590
    wooliedyed said:

    SeaShantyIrish2 said:

    wooliedyed said:

    Afternoon all, back from an afternoon with the other Woolies. Safe to say he's arsed this up royally. A very angry Pa Woolie and big Sis woolie just utterly gobsmacked at what he'd done, cannot understand how, why or what on earth he thought he'd gain from it. She's not particularly news savvy but had heard this this morning (in contrast when I mentioned milkshake girl later on she said 'huh? Who? What?)
    What an utter prick of a man

    Sunak did apologize, like you said he should. Does that cut any ice with you & yours?
    I did not say he should apologise as far as I can recall? Not really though is the answer, it's no different to Brown rocking up at Mrs Duffy's door, damage done. I mean it's better than him saying 'yeah? And?' But its done now, and the more I think on it the more he clearly cannot be arsed. He needs to make way for someone who cares.
    Yep far too late now. He's supposed to be the leader of the party of the 'Somewheres' and he's outted himself as an extreme 'Anywhere'.
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,485
    Andy_JS said:

    Confirmation of no Tory candidate in Rotherham.

    It was going to be Laila Cunningham (of Kensington and Bayswater) but she withdrew her nomination for some reason.

    https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https://www.rotherham.gov.uk/downloads/file/3885/statement-of-person-nominated-and-notice-of-poll-for-rotherham&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK

    She preferred to spend June in west London rather than chasing a lost cause in Rotherham?
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,553
    edited June 7
    SeaShantyIrish2 said:

    So is there confirmation yet re: the full list of UK GE 2024 candidates?

    And if so, is it posted on web somewhere?

    There's no official list, it relies on amateurs and news organisations to compile a spreadsheet with all the candidates. At the last 4 or 5 elections I did it myself and it was quite popular, even with journalists. The Press Association is probably the closest to an official list.

    We probably won't get a full slate for a 48 hours because usually there are a few councils who can't be bothered to publish it as soon as they could do.
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 10,061
    HYUFD said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Andy_JS said:

    Confirmation of no Tory candidate in Rotherham.

    It was going to be Laila Cunningham (of Kensington and Bayswater) but she withdrew her nomination for some reason.

    https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https://www.rotherham.gov.uk/downloads/file/3885/statement-of-person-nominated-and-notice-of-poll-for-rotherham&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK

    Did the Conservatives find a candidate for Hemel Hempstead in the end?
    Not quite sure what happened there, Jaymey McIvor who was the candidate is an Epping Forest councillor
    An accusation was made with accompanying photograph I believe
  • eekeek Posts: 28,369
    eek said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Andy_JS said:

    Confirmation of no Tory candidate in Rotherham.

    It was going to be Laila Cunningham (of Kensington and Bayswater) but she withdrew her nomination for some reason.

    https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https://www.rotherham.gov.uk/downloads/file/3885/statement-of-person-nominated-and-notice-of-poll-for-rotherham&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK

    Did the Conservatives find a candidate for Hemel Hempstead in the end?
    Yes the former Tory party council leader - Andrew Williams

    See https://x.com/tomorrowsmps/status/1799084840295489729

    In theory a safe Tory seat, in reality I suspect the Lib Dems could grab it..
    to late to edit - I'm wrong this seat is like High Wycombe so heading Labour, it's the surrounding seats that will be heading Lib Dem..
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,153
    Nigelb said:

    This is getting ridiculous.

    Clarence Thomas has YET AGAIN amended his financial disclosure form ONLY AFTER getting caught by ProPublica. Thomas must RESIGN.
    https://x.com/MuellerSheWrote/status/1799124842115113338

    It's not a good look for someone who is the business of administering justice.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,083
    Nigelb said:

    This is getting ridiculous.

    Clarence Thomas has YET AGAIN amended his financial disclosure form ONLY AFTER getting caught by ProPublica. Thomas must RESIGN.
    https://x.com/MuellerSheWrote/status/1799124842115113338

    The man is quite clearly as corrupt as they come. And for reasons of politics and preserving the power of the Supreme Court from other branches of government, the rest of them will never do anything about it - holding people accountable is a very foreign concept now.

    If this is even half correct it would be ludicrous how forgiving of receiving 'gifts' they are - the problem of the appearance of impropriety being a problem only applies to lesser judges apparently.

  • PedestrianRockPedestrianRock Posts: 580
    edited June 7
    Having thought all week about how pivotal today would be, I’m now a little worried that Mordaunt will do very decently, and hurt my trading bets in the process. I really wish it was Sunak up there instead.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,553
    rcs1000 said:

    Andy_JS said:

    Confirmation of no Tory candidate in Rotherham.

    It was going to be Laila Cunningham (of Kensington and Bayswater) but she withdrew her nomination for some reason.

    https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https://www.rotherham.gov.uk/downloads/file/3885/statement-of-person-nominated-and-notice-of-poll-for-rotherham&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK

    Did the Conservatives find a candidate for Hemel Hempstead in the end?
    Not sure yet, the council hasn't published the SOPN.
  • CiceroCicero Posts: 3,078
    eek said:

    Peter_the_Punter said:

    @eek FPT

    Well thanks for the heads-up on the Reform Candidate in Tewkesbury. I've been watching out for that on two Sites but neither showed it. This is of some significance for me and other punters.

    A few days ago I put the LDs up as a bet at 7/1 but stressed this should be a lot shorter if Ref stood. It's now 5/1 with a couple of firms and 9/2 with Lads and if you are right (I'm sure you are) that is stonking value. As you shrewdly observed, the nice Labour lady is from Kent and looks no more than a token candidate who will one day be offered a more promising opportunity. The LD candidate assures me that 'Labour is nowhere' and the Yellow team is running them perilously close. This is all before Mr Sunak's half day out at the seaside.

    As always, DYOR, but this looks a good one to me.

    I grabbed it at 5-1 because by the time I saw your post the 7/1 had gone to 9/2.

    If the Lib Dems are winning Tewkesbury, they are clearly going to win Cheltenham and must be looking pretty good for South Cotswolds too. Labour will get Stroud and Forest of Dean. Gloucester is open (the Lib Dems won the locals, but it has been Labour in the past). Could the Tories really be reduced to only one seat in Gloucestershire? If so, then Surrey and several other Wessex counties are also in play.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,421
    I find the D-day stuff a bit overblown to be honest.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,153
    kle4 said:

    Nigelb said:

    This is getting ridiculous.

    Clarence Thomas has YET AGAIN amended his financial disclosure form ONLY AFTER getting caught by ProPublica. Thomas must RESIGN.
    https://x.com/MuellerSheWrote/status/1799124842115113338

    The man is quite clearly as corrupt as they come. And for reasons of politics and preserving the power of the Supreme Court from other branches of government, the rest of them will never do anything about it - holding people accountable is a very foreign concept now.

    If this is even half correct it would be ludicrous how forgiving of receiving 'gifts' they are - the problem of the appearance of impropriety being a problem only applies to lesser judges apparently.

    What is so sad is that American politics has become so polarized that half the country is willing to ignore this, because he's "their guy".
  • ToryJimToryJim Posts: 4,189
    the Conservative party has shelved efforts to pull together a letter from major big business chiefs backing the party in the run-up to the election, in the latest sign the campaign is struggling

    https://x.com/pickardje/status/1799125179307794593?s=46

    Heart of stone etc
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,553
    eek said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Andy_JS said:

    Confirmation of no Tory candidate in Rotherham.

    It was going to be Laila Cunningham (of Kensington and Bayswater) but she withdrew her nomination for some reason.

    https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https://www.rotherham.gov.uk/downloads/file/3885/statement-of-person-nominated-and-notice-of-poll-for-rotherham&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK

    Did the Conservatives find a candidate for Hemel Hempstead in the end?
    Yes the former Tory party council leader - Andrew Williams

    See https://x.com/tomorrowsmps/status/1799084840295489729

    In theory a safe Tory seat, in reality I suspect the Lib Dems could grab it..
    It would be a Labour win, not a LD. Labour held the seat from 1997 to 2005.
  • CleitophonCleitophon Posts: 480
    Why does Rishi put himself through this. I would just resign. It is tortuous to watch.....the conservatives stand humiliation and defeat must be soul crushing.


    All I can say is: brexit destroyed the right. I see reform as a defensive move for the populists after the ukippification of the conservatives failed. This is a retreat. And the current right will never come back after this. They just don't have the numbers. Being mainly Boomer OAPs the right is numerically in permanent decline. In 2029 and 2034 the situation will be much much worse for the right, and you can forget about brexiteers being able to stop anything.

    The future of the right looks like this. Term 1: ideological purists tear into each other in all out civil war. Term 2: some kind of stability appears and a new generation of centre right, progressive, pro eu millenials come in as juniors. Most of the current party will be gone. Term three: the millial generation take up leadership and begin to forge a new electoral basis. Term four: they win and get to lead the newly eu enrolled uk.

    Hari Seldon has spoken
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,553
    edited June 7
    Anabobazina said:

    Andy_JS said:

    Confirmation of no Tory candidate in Rotherham.

    It was going to be Laila Cunningham (of Kensington and Bayswater) but she withdrew her nomination for some reason.

    https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https://www.rotherham.gov.uk/downloads/file/3885/statement-of-person-nominated-and-notice-of-poll-for-rotherham&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK

    She preferred to spend June in west London rather than chasing a lost cause in Rotherham?
    Councillor for Lancaster Gate. I bet Conservative central office is furious with this situation.

    https://www.westminsterconservatives.com/people/laila-cunningham

    https://x.com/policylaila
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,153
    Peter_the_Punter said:

    rcs1000 said:

    FWIW, the 3-1 on the LibDems to come second doesn't appeal to me. That seems generous for a party which is hovering around the 10% mark.

    You thought they were a sell on the spreads when they were on 36, Robert. I agreed with you, so I've got nothing to shout about, but I can't see this Tory collapse as anything but good news for the Yellow Peril.

    I'm on.
    Oh yes: there's no doubt that the rise of Reform is manna from heaven for the LibDems. Ed Davey is a lucky general.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,083
    rcs1000 said:

    kle4 said:

    Nigelb said:

    This is getting ridiculous.

    Clarence Thomas has YET AGAIN amended his financial disclosure form ONLY AFTER getting caught by ProPublica. Thomas must RESIGN.
    https://x.com/MuellerSheWrote/status/1799124842115113338

    The man is quite clearly as corrupt as they come. And for reasons of politics and preserving the power of the Supreme Court from other branches of government, the rest of them will never do anything about it - holding people accountable is a very foreign concept now.

    If this is even half correct it would be ludicrous how forgiving of receiving 'gifts' they are - the problem of the appearance of impropriety being a problem only applies to lesser judges apparently.

    What is so sad is that American politics has become so polarized that half the country is willing to ignore this, because he's "their guy".
    And Supreme Court justice is such a powerful position, it's worth nearly any price to keep your guys and do anything it takes to keep any appointment of a new one under your own President. Decades of mostly reliable political backing on the court (yes, many cases will not split on party lines, but the big controversial ones often will).
  • ToryJimToryJim Posts: 4,189
    HYUFD said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Andy_JS said:

    Confirmation of no Tory candidate in Rotherham.

    It was going to be Laila Cunningham (of Kensington and Bayswater) but she withdrew her nomination for some reason.

    https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https://www.rotherham.gov.uk/downloads/file/3885/statement-of-person-nominated-and-notice-of-poll-for-rotherham&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK

    Did the Conservatives find a candidate for Hemel Hempstead in the end?
    Not quite sure what happened there, Jaymey McIvor who was the candidate is an Epping Forest councillor
    Last minute LRM style allegations to CCHQ who have suspended his membership and banned him from standing or campaigning in the General Election.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,553
    Tories described Rotherham as "unwinnable", but in fact it's number 40 on their target list out of 268.

    https://www.electionpolling.co.uk/battleground/targets/conservative
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,083
    ToryJim said:

    the Conservative party has shelved efforts to pull together a letter from major big business chiefs backing the party in the run-up to the election, in the latest sign the campaign is struggling

    https://x.com/pickardje/status/1799125179307794593?s=46

    Heart of stone etc

    On the plus side it avoids the standard situation of the letter unravelling after it is published when it is revealed some of the signatories are wrong 'uns, others did not agree to sign it, and its contents are picked apart.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,083
    edited June 7
    Andy_JS said:

    Tories described Rotherham as "unwinnable", but in fact it's number 40 on their target list out of 268.

    https://www.electionpolling.co.uk/battleground/targets/conservative

    Nothing inaccurate in their calling it unwinnable.

    But of course hundreds of seats are unwinnable but get candidates from the top parties anyway.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,070
    kle4 said:

    Nigelb said:

    This is getting ridiculous.

    Clarence Thomas has YET AGAIN amended his financial disclosure form ONLY AFTER getting caught by ProPublica. Thomas must RESIGN.
    https://x.com/MuellerSheWrote/status/1799124842115113338

    The man is quite clearly as corrupt as they come. And for reasons of politics and preserving the power of the Supreme Court from other branches of government, the rest of them will never do anything about it - holding people accountable is a very foreign concept now.

    If this is even half correct it would be ludicrous how forgiving of receiving 'gifts' they are - the problem of the appearance of impropriety being a problem only applies to lesser judges apparently.

    Yes, I posted that yesterday.
    I don't see how anyone can even begin to justify it.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,625
    Cleitophon said:

    Why does Rishi put himself through this. I would just resign. It is tortuous to watch.....the conservatives stand humiliation and defeat must be soul crushing.


    All I can say is: brexit destroyed the right. I see reform as a defensive move for the populists after the ukippification of the conservatives failed. This is a retreat. And the current right will never come back after this. They just don't have the numbers. Being mainly Boomer OAPs the right is numerically in permanent decline. In 2029 and 2034 the situation will be much much worse for the right, and you can forget about brexiteers being able to stop anything.

    The future of the right looks like this. Term 1: ideological purists tear into each other in all out civil war. Term 2: some kind of stability appears and a new generation of centre right, progressive, pro eu millenials come in as juniors. Most of the current party will be gone. Term three: the millial generation take up leadership and begin to forge a new electoral basis. Term four: they win and get to lead the newly eu enrolled uk.

    Hari Seldon has spoken

    Equating the EU with liberal progressivism is a very post-Brexit British way of thinking. There's nothing inherently progressive about the integration of European countries.
  • ToryJimToryJim Posts: 4,189
    Looks like Rishi could get quite literally binned, as the Count is standing in Richmond.

    https://x.com/countbinface/status/1799119807486316592?s=46
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,134
    williamglenn said:

    kinabalu said:

    Just to say, I don't want a humungous Labour majority at the price of empowering Farage. I'll take the vanilla landslide.

    The realignment of British politics will take two stages:

    - Stage One: Destroy the Tories and give Labour a big majority with gains for the Lib Dems and Reform
    - Stage Two: Destroy the Labour Party and re-establish a Liberal vs right-wing two-party system
    So Rishi is right with his warning then. Back to square one
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,553
    edited June 7
    Former Labour MP for Kensington Emma Dent Coad is standing again as an independent.

    https://www.rbkc.gov.uk/sites/default/files/media/documents/SoPN Kensington and Bayswater Constituency.pdf

    "Kensington & Bayswater - 10 candidates

    ADAM, Mona - Green Party
    BUCHAN, Felicity - The Conservative Party Candidate
    BURCA, Marc Francis - Reform UK
    DENT COAD, Emma - Independent
    HOUNGBO, William - Liberal Democrat
    O`MAHONY, Una Marie - Party of Women
    PHILLIPS, Roger David - Christian People's Alliance
    POWELL, Joe - Labour Party
    PRINCE ANKIT LOVE, Emperor of India - no description
    STEVENS, John Christopher Courtenay - Rejoin EU"
  • Peter_the_PunterPeter_the_Punter Posts: 14,324
    Nigelb said:

    Clearing out an embarrassingly large mound of paper in my office today, around 2/3rds of the way down, I came across an old copy of Computer Weekly, which I must have deliberately saved at the time.

    The date, 12-18 May 2009.
    The front page" "Bankruptcy, prosecution, disrupted livelihoods.
    Postmasters** tell their story."

    CW comment:
    "The company insists the IT system has been exonerated and fully tested, but we would contend that does not mean local problems are impossible.
    The Post Office has a responsibility to fully investigate users' concerns, and the postmasters' complaints may have left* a question mark over whether it does this. There is also the question of whether the Post Office has allowed the postmasters to pay for mistakes produced by the technology...."

    (*That 'may have" sounds like in-house lawyer speak.)

    If a pleb like me twigged to it, it's impossible that directors were not aware of the likelihood of a problem.

    (**Lee Castleton
    Jo Hamilton
    Noel Thomas
    Amar Bajaj
    Alan Bates
    Alan Brown
    Julie Ford)

    The testimony of Alice Perkins removed any doubt I previously had about this, Nigel.

    They knew alright.
  • AramintaMoonbeamQCAramintaMoonbeamQC Posts: 3,855
    FPT: Ex Tory Georgina Hill standing against Anne Marie Trevelyan as an Ind in North Northumberland, should hive off a few unhappy Con voters. If Reform stand a candidate, it could be Goodnight Berwick.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,083
    edited June 7
    Nigelb said:

    kle4 said:

    Nigelb said:

    This is getting ridiculous.

    Clarence Thomas has YET AGAIN amended his financial disclosure form ONLY AFTER getting caught by ProPublica. Thomas must RESIGN.
    https://x.com/MuellerSheWrote/status/1799124842115113338

    The man is quite clearly as corrupt as they come. And for reasons of politics and preserving the power of the Supreme Court from other branches of government, the rest of them will never do anything about it - holding people accountable is a very foreign concept now.

    If this is even half correct it would be ludicrous how forgiving of receiving 'gifts' they are - the problem of the appearance of impropriety being a problem only applies to lesser judges apparently.

    Yes, I posted that yesterday.
    I don't see how anyone can even begin to justify it.
    Watch Chief Justice Roberts manage it.

    I think when the first set of allegations came out it forced the Court to belatedly adopt some guidance, but the response dripped of institutional entitlement that no one has the right to criticise the Court or seek to do anything to it no matter how egregious the conduct might become.

    From the outside it feels like a very unequal branch of government.
  • BatteryCorrectHorseBatteryCorrectHorse Posts: 3,647
    A heckler interrupts Rishi Sunak during a live TV interview to raise concerns about GP staffing

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/1799129716743630892
  • AlsoLeiAlsoLei Posts: 1,457
    edited June 7
    FPT:
    Chris said:

    Just a thought.

    People have been struggling to understand several things about the D-Day affair - how Sunak could have been mad enough to leave early, why that time and date for recording the interview were suggested by the Tories, and why it was so far in advance of transmission.

    It is conceivable that there was going to be an attempt by senior party figures to take control of the direction of the campaign, and that Sunak was desperate to pre-empt that by recording the interview before it could happen? Perhaps in the same way as in 1990 Thatcher rushed out and told the press she was fighting on, before her colleagues could stop her?

    Consider Moonrabbit's point about the awkward position the party finds itself in after Sunak told so many lies in the debate. The D-Day interview won't be broadcast for a week, and seems to have been centred on the tax lie - which means that every senior Tory must now continue repeating it at least until the air date.

    So it seems likely that the decision to do the interview was an attempt to strong-arm the party into backing his strategy. And if that's the case, it'll mean that he binned the D-Day commemoration to shore up his own position within the party.

    As you say, it's his version of Thatcher's "we fight on; we fight to win!". Is there a Ken Clarke waiting in the wings to make him back down?
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,153
    Andy_JS said:

    Former Labour MP for Kensington Emma Dent Coad is standing again as an independent.

    https://www.rbkc.gov.uk/sites/default/files/media/documents/SoPN Kensington and Bayswater Constituency.pdf

    "Kensington & Bayswater - 10 candidates

    ADAM, Mona - Green Party
    BUCHAN, Felicity - The Conservative Party Candidate
    BURCA, Marc Francis - Reform UK
    DENT COAD, Emma - Independent
    HOUNGBO, William - Liberal Democrat
    O`MAHONY, Una Marie - Party of Women
    PHILLIPS, Roger David - Christian People's Alliance
    POWELL, Joe - Labour Party
    PRINCE ANKIT LOVE, Emperor of India - no description
    STEVENS, John Christopher Courtenay - Rejoin EU"

    I'd be staggered if she retained her deposit.
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,663
    Luckyguy1983 said:

    I find the D-day stuff a bit overblown to be honest.

    Well me too in some ways, but we are not the demographic that cares intensely about such matters... the demographic that does is (was) largely the one the Tories had not lost. So I see why it is such a big deal.
This discussion has been closed.