Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

How will the Tory betting look after tonight’s TV debate? – politicalbetting.com

12345679»

Comments

  • Options
    TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 40,232
    Leon said:

    Can someone - anyone - just say "the NHS is an OK health service but let's stop wanking on about it like it is Jesus, you craven craven idiots"

    Once someone says “the UK is an OK developed unitary state but let's stop wanking on about it like it is Jesus, you craven craven idiots" that’ll open the floodgates of measured realism.
  • Options
    CookieCookie Posts: 11,496
    Cookie said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    God, Boris was better than this bunch

    *help*

    On the other hand, Starmer is worse than several of them

    *yay*

    No and not really, just the one.
    Starmer is fairly shit. Sorry. But he is, and let us not forget this. He only got the job because so many more talented players fled the field during the Corbyn Terror

    Starmer would be worried by the working class female Mordaunt, he might struggle against BME woman Badenoch, or not (because she is such a wildcard). He would be certainly equalled by Sunak (and probably outfoxed on financial matters)

    He'd only be truly confident against Tugendhat (posh white inexperienced soldier, easy easy) or the ridiculous Truss
    Keir Starmer is working class, why are you so dishonest?
    I do try to be nice to you, but please stop putting words in my mouth. At no point did I deny that Starmer is Working Class (tho actually I would say he is lower middle class: like Mordaunt - I was using shorthand)

    Angela Rayner is authentic working class
    I misread your post, I will apologise.

    But Starmer is working class, he fits the definition based on upbringing.
    Apology accepted

    Thankyou

    For what is is worth, I agree with the consensus on here, both are lower middle class, borderline working class

    It is sad that Britain is still saddled with these near-Indian type caste definitions, but we are, for now

    And if it comes to a revolution, right now I am on the side of the communards. Enough of the fucking posh boys. Enough Camerons, Johnsons and Sunaks. I want someone from the barrios in Number 10. We've had enough Etonians for a generation
    Starmer is a lawyer. Middle Class.
    But I accept that Horse was talking about his upbringing.
    But my understanding was that Starmer's father owned a small toolmaking firm. That strikes me as a middle class ba0
    ...ckground? Though granted I do not know the finer details. And it doesn't matter hugely.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,457
    OnboardG1 said:

    Conservative voters

    Tugendhat 29%
    Sunak 28%
    Mordaunt 15%
    Badenoch 12%
    Truss 10%

    Mordaunt is out

    Tory party increasingly divorced from own voter base shocker.
    The Woke take here would be that the Tory party doesn't have a problem with women but voters at large do.
  • Options
    bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 7,714

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    God, Boris was better than this bunch

    *help*

    On the other hand, Starmer is worse than several of them

    *yay*

    No and not really, just the one.
    Starmer is fairly shit. Sorry. But he is, and let us not forget this. He only got the job because so many more talented players fled the field during the Corbyn Terror

    Starmer would be worried by the working class female Mordaunt, he might struggle against BME woman Badenoch, or not (because she is such a wildcard). He would be certainly equalled by Sunak (and probably outfoxed on financial matters)

    He'd only be truly confident against Tugendhat (posh white inexperienced soldier, easy easy) or the ridiculous Truss
    Keir Starmer is working class, why are you so dishonest?
    Starmer is clearly middle class. Do you mean he had a working class upbringing?
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,457
    Scott_xP said:

    Based on what you have seen tonight, do you think each of the following would be a good / bad PM?

    Tugendhat 61/31
    Sunak 51/45
    Mordaunt 44/49
    Badenoch 41/49
    Truss 29/65

    https://twitter.com/OpiniumResearch/status/1548040513315475456/photo/1

    That tells me not much in it between Sunak, Mordaunt and Badenoch. Tugendhat irrelevant because he's going out.

    So it's just dire for Truss.
  • Options
    GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 20,865
    My brother…

    “Kemi nervous and not ready. Only has one policy”
    “Tug annoys with his constant military references. But could be PM I suppose”.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,321
    So basically, the big gainer tonight was Tugendhat who might now not be eliminated in the next round?
  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,474
    New thread.
  • Options
    FrankBoothFrankBooth Posts: 9,052
    Rishi was pretty sharp but if he's so clever why didn't he take apart Truss's plan on refinancing the national debt - which I understand would cost more in the long run

    Tom was okay but for a military man he was a little too smooth.

    Penny a bit disappointing. Has she fallen into the trap of playing it safe? Simplify the tax system. How?

    Kemi quite interesting but lacks experience

    Liz didn't speak too badly but she's terribly wooden. I struggle to see her as PM.
  • Options
    kinabalukinabalu Posts: 39,310
    This tv debate: Rishi Blair best, Maggie Truss worst, but the main thing coming over to me is that all 5 would be absolutely fabulous PMs compared to the previous bloke.

    How on earth did the Cons ever think it was ok to foist him on the country? They'll be hoping that question doesn't occur to too many of the electorate.
  • Options
    MattWMattW Posts: 18,654
    Carnyx said:

    MattW said:

    Carnyx said:

    MaxPB said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    MaxPB said:

    What?
    image

    That's a completely idiotic soundbite. One of the innovations is X-ray Tomography which is the basis of CT scanning. It's demonstrably false.
    Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Coherent Light Emission, transistors...
    NMR is at least an American innovation, so not in that list of 180. Though as CHB points out, the NHS uses the web and it's absolutely number one on the list.
    Eh?? Georg Radda waves a very firm hand.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Radda
    Presumably MRI Scanning was on that list?

    Sir Peter Mansfield shared a Nobel Prize for that. Based at University of Nottingham. Used in the NHS.

    Even if we are just talking COVID, and ignoring the most AZ vaccine, there is the innovative use of mass data from the NHS for a number of innovations, that use of mass data itself, the viral sequencing programme, the ability to do more rapid research than almost anywhere, the discovery of dexamethasone as a treatment to ease the symptoms for people on ventilators, and plenty more.

    Has PM taken an innovative hallucinogen?
    Quite so. I'm baffled.
    I see that even my spelling is innovative.
  • Options
    kinabalu said:

    This tv debate: Rishi Blair best, Maggie Truss worst, but the main thing coming over to me is that all 5 would be absolutely fabulous PMs compared to the previous bloke.

    How on earth did the Cons ever think it was ok to foist him on the country? They'll be hoping that question doesn't occur to too many of the electorate.

    As a Conservative member I completely agree with you. I voted for Jeremy Hunt last time but I didn't think Boris would be quite as bad as he turned out.
  • Options
    StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 7,081

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    God, Boris was better than this bunch

    *help*

    On the other hand, Starmer is worse than several of them

    *yay*

    No and not really, just the one.
    Starmer is fairly shit. Sorry. But he is, and let us not forget this. He only got the job because so many more talented players fled the field during the Corbyn Terror

    Starmer would be worried by the working class female Mordaunt, he might struggle against BME woman Badenoch, or not (because she is such a wildcard). He would be certainly equalled by Sunak (and probably outfoxed on financial matters)

    He'd only be truly confident against Tugendhat (posh white inexperienced soldier, easy easy) or the ridiculous Truss
    Keir Starmer is working class, why are youso dishonest?
    Each to his station in life, right? No opportunity to improve yourself through talent and hard work?

    Starmer is not working class. He may have been born into the lower middle class/skilled working class but he has absolutely succeeded in life and by any standards in upper middle class

  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,758
    OnboardG1 said:

    MaxPB said:

    What?
    image

    That's a completely idiotic soundbite. One of the innovations is X-ray Tomography which is the basis of CT scanning. It's demonstrably false.
    Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Coherent Light Emission, transistors...
    Monoclonal antibodies.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,758
    Toms said:

    About Kemi's tooth:

    It's a FEATURE like a flying buttress, gargoyle, or topiary hedge.

    None of which you’d really want in your mouth.
  • Options
    GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,082

    OnboardG1 said:

    Conservative voters

    Tugendhat 29%
    Sunak 28%
    Mordaunt 15%
    Badenoch 12%
    Truss 10%

    Mordaunt is out

    Tory party increasingly divorced from own voter base shocker.
    The Woke take here would be that the Tory party doesn't have a problem with women but voters at large do.
    What is woke about that?
  • Options
    FarooqFarooq Posts: 10,775

    MikeL said:

    In all honesty, Sunak is the most credible PM by miles.

    How on earth do you get to that?
    Probably by not being a fucking lunatic like you
This discussion has been closed.